The Internal Challenge to Malaysia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Singapore, July 2006
Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Singapore, July 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: SINGAPORE July 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Singapore (English-language name). Also, in other official languages: Republik Singapura (Malay), Xinjiapo Gongheguo― 新加坡共和国 (Chinese), and Cingkappãr Kudiyarasu (Tamil) சி க யரச. Short Form: Singapore. Click to Enlarge Image Term for Citizen(s): Singaporean(s). Capital: Singapore. Major Cities: Singapore is a city-state. The city of Singapore is located on the south-central coast of the island of Singapore, but urbanization has taken over most of the territory of the island. Date of Independence: August 31, 1963, from Britain; August 9, 1965, from the Federation of Malaysia. National Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1); Lunar New Year (movable date in January or February); Hari Raya Haji (Feast of the Sacrifice, movable date in February); Good Friday (movable date in March or April); Labour Day (May 1); Vesak Day (June 2); National Day or Independence Day (August 9); Deepavali (movable date in November); Hari Raya Puasa (end of Ramadan, movable date according to the Islamic lunar calendar); and Christmas (December 25). Flag: Two equal horizontal bands of red (top) and white; a vertical white crescent (closed portion toward the hoist side), partially enclosing five white-point stars arranged in a circle, positioned near the hoist side of the red band. The red band symbolizes universal brotherhood and the equality of men; the white band, purity and virtue. The crescent moon represents Click to Enlarge Image a young nation on the rise, while the five stars stand for the ideals of democracy, peace, progress, justice, and equality. -
Singapore's Chinese-Speaking and Their Perspectives on Merger
Chinese Southern Diaspora Studies, Volume 5, 2011-12 南方華裔研究雜志, 第五卷, 2011-12 “Flesh and Bone Reunite as One Body”: Singapore’s Chinese- speaking and their Perspectives on Merger ©2012 Thum Ping Tjin* Abstract Singapore’s Chinese speakers played the determining role in Singapore’s merger with the Federation. Yet the historiography is silent on their perspectives, values, and assumptions. Using contemporary Chinese- language sources, this article argues that in approaching merger, the Chinese were chiefly concerned with livelihoods, education, and citizenship rights; saw themselves as deserving of an equal place in Malaya; conceived of a new, distinctive, multiethnic Malayan identity; and rejected communist ideology. Meanwhile, the leaders of UMNO were intent on preserving their electoral dominance and the special position of Malays in the Federation. Finally, the leaders of the PAP were desperate to retain power and needed the Federation to remove their political opponents. The interaction of these three factors explains the shape, structure, and timing of merger. This article also sheds light on the ambiguity inherent in the transfer of power and the difficulties of national identity formation in a multiethnic state. Keywords: Chinese-language politics in Singapore; History of Malaya; the merger of Singapore and the Federation of Malaya; Decolonisation Introduction Singapore’s merger with the Federation of Malaya is one of the most pivotal events in the country’s history. This process was determined by the ballot box – two general elections, two by-elections, and a referendum on merger in four years. The centrality of the vote to this process meant that Singapore’s Chinese-speaking1 residents, as the vast majority of the colony’s residents, played the determining role. -
The War on Terrorism and the Internal Security Act of Singapore
Damien Cheong ____________________________________________________________ Selling Security: The War on Terrorism and the Internal Security Act of Singapore DAMIEN CHEONG Abstract The Internal Security Act (ISA) of Singapore has been transformed from a se- curity law into an effective political instrument of the Singapore government. Although the government's use of the ISA for political purposes elicited negative reactions from the public, it was not prepared to abolish, or make amendments to the Act. In the wake of September 11 and the international campaign against terrorism, the opportunity to (re)legitimize the government's use of the ISA emerged. This paper argues that despite the ISA's seeming importance in the fight against terrorism, the absence of explicit definitions of national security threats, either in the Act itself, or in accompanying legislation, renders the ISA susceptible to political misuse. Keywords: Internal Security Act, War on Terrorism. People's Action Party, Jemaah Islamiyah. Introduction In 2001/2002, the Singapore government arrested and detained several Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) operatives under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for engaging in terrorist activities. It was alleged that the detained operatives were planning to attack local and foreign targets in Singa- pore. The arrests outraged human rights groups, as the operation was reminiscent of the government's crackdown on several alleged Marxist conspirators in1987. Human rights advocates were concerned that the current detainees would be dissuaded from seeking legal counsel and subjected to ill treatment during their period of incarceration (Tang 1989: 4-7; Frank et al. 1991: 5-99). Despite these protests, many Singaporeans expressed their strong support for the government's actions. -
Pola Politik Kaum Dalam Pilihan Raya Umum Malaysia Ke-13: Kajian Kes Negeri Selangor
GEOGRAFIA OnlineTM Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 11 issue 9 (99 - 111) 99 © 2015, ISSN 2180-2491 Pola politik kaum dalam Pilihan Raya Umum Malaysia Ke-13: Kajian kes Negeri Selangor Junaidi Awang Besar1, Muhammad Hazim Abdul Ghani1, Mohd Fuad Mat Jali1, Novel Lyndon1 1Pusat Pengajian Sosial, Pembangunan dan Persekitaran, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor Correspondence: Junaidi Awang Besar (email: [email protected]) Abstrak Pada Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 Barisan Nasional (BN) gagal mendapat majoriti 2/3 kerusi Parlimen, namun masih menguasai kerusi Parlimen dengan majoriti mudah. Terdapat beberapa buah negeri terus dikuasai oleh parti-parti dalam PR, iaitu Selangor, Pulau Pinang dan Kelantan. Keputusan PRU Ke-13 juga menunjukkan bahawa parti-parti dalam PR menguasai majoriti kerusi Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) Selangor sebanyak 44 kerusi berbanding BN hanya 12 kerusi. Menggunakan data yang diperolehi daripada laporan Keputusan PRU Ke-12 dan PRU Ke-13, artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis pola kaum dalam pengundian pada PRU Ke-13 di negeri Selangor. Hasil kajian menunjukkan pengundi di kawasan bandar cenderung menyokong PR berbanding pengundi di luar bandar yang terus setia bersama BN. Majoriti (87 peratus) pengundi kaum Cina dan 57 peratus pengundi India menyokong PR berbanding 63 peratus pengundi Melayu yang lebih mempercayai BN/UMNO. Analisis ini berguna kepada parti- parti politik untuk menghadapi PRU Ke-14 akan datang. Katakunci: kaum, parti politik, pengundi, Pilihan Raya Umum, pola pengundian, politik th Patterns of ethnic politics in Malaysia’s 13 General Election: A case study of Selangor Abstract Ethnic politics may produce particular dynamics in shaping the process and outcome of a general election. -
Case Study Women in Politics: Reflections from Malaysia
International IDEA, 2002, Women in Parliament, Stockholm (http://www.idea.int). This is an English translation of Wan Azizah, “Perempuan dalam Politik: Refleksi dari Malaysia,” in International IDEA, 2002, Perempuan di Parlemen: Bukan Sekedar Jumlah, Stockholm: International IDEA, pp. 191-202. (This translation may vary slightly from the original text. If there are discrepancies in the meaning, the original Bahasa-Indonesia version is the definitive text). Case Study Women in Politics: Reflections from Malaysia Wan Azizah Women constitute half of humanity, and it follows that any decision-making, whether at the personal, family, societal or public levels, should be mindful of and involve the participation of women in the making of those decisions. Women’s political, social and economic rights are an integral and inseparable part of their human rights. Democracy is an inclusive process, and therefore in a functioning democracy, the points of view of different interest groups must be taken into account in formulating any decision. The interest and opinions of men, women and minorities must be part of that decision-making process. Yet far from being included in the decision-making process, women find themselves under-represented in political institutions. Numerous challenges confront women entering politics. Among them are lack of party support, family support and the "masculine model" of political life. Many feel that Malaysian society is still male dominated, and men are threatened by the idea of women holding senior posts. In the political sphere this is compounded by the high premium placed on political power. This makes some men even less willing to share power with women. -
The North Kalimantan Communist Party and the People's Republic Of
The Developing Economies, XLIII-4 (December 2005): 489–513 THE NORTH KALIMANTAN COMMUNIST PARTY AND THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FUJIO HARA First version received January 2005; final version accepted July 2005 In this article, the author offers a detailed analysis of the history of the North Kalimantan Communist Party (NKCP), a political organization whose foundation date itself has been thus far ambiguous, relying mainly on the party’s own documents. The relation- ships between the Brunei Uprising and the armed struggle in Sarawak are also referred to. Though the Brunei Uprising of 1962 waged by the Partai Rakyat Brunei (People’s Party of Brunei) was soon followed by armed struggle in Sarawak, their relations have so far not been adequately analyzed. The author also examines the decisive roles played by Wen Ming Chyuan, Chairman of the NKCP, and the People’s Republic of China, which supported the NKCP for the entire period following its inauguration. INTRODUCTION PRELIMINARY study of the North Kalimantan Communist Party (NKCP, here- after referred to as “the Party”), an illegal leftist political party based in A Sarawak, was published by this author in 2000 (Hara 2000). However, the study did not rely on the official documents of the Party itself, but instead relied mainly on information provided by third parties such as the Renmin ribao of China and the Zhen xian bao, the newspaper that was the weekly organ of the now defunct Barisan Sosialis of Singapore. Though these were closely connected with the NKCP, many problems still remained unresolved. In this study the author attempts to construct a more precise party history relying mainly on the party’s own information and docu- ments provided by former members during the author’s visit to Sibu in August 2001.1 –––––––––––––––––––––––––– This paper is an outcome of research funded by the Pache Research Subsidy I-A of Nanzan University for the academic year 2000. -
One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan
One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R. -
Asian-Parliaments.Pdf
Asian Parliaments Bangladesh Government type: parliamentary democracy unicameral National Parliament or Jatiya Sangsad; 300 seats elected by popular vote from single territorial constituencies (the constitutional amendment reserving 30 seats for women over and above the 300 regular parliament seats expired in May 2001); members serve fiveyear terms elections: last held 1 October 2001 (next to be held no later than January 2007) Bhutan Government type: monarchy; special treaty relationship with India unicameral National Assembly or Tshogdu (150 seats; 105 elected from village constituencies, 10 represent religious bodies, and 35 are designated by the monarch to represent government and other secular interests; members serve threeyear terms) elections: local elections last held August 2005 (next to be held in 2008) Burma Government type: military junta (leader not elected) Unicameral People's Assembly or Pyithu Hluttaw (485 seats; members elected by popular vote to serve fouryear terms) elections: last held 27 May 1990, but Assembly never allowed by junta to convene Cambodia Government type: multiparty democracy under a constitutional monarchy established in September 1993 Bicameral, consists of the National Assembly (123 seats; members elected by popular vote to serve fiveyear terms) and the Senate (61 seats; 2 members appointed by the monarch, 2 elected by the National Assembly, and 57 elected by parliamentarians and commune councils; members serve fiveyear terms) elections: National Assembly last held 27 July 2003 (next to be -
In This Issue: 63Rd Merdeka Approaching Sabah State Still in Search of a Malaysian Elections Identity
Aug 2020 No. 6 advisoryIMAN Research In this issue: 63rd Merdeka Approaching Sabah State Still in Search of A Malaysian Elections Identity Photo credit: Deva Darshan Based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, IMAN Research (legally registered as PanjiAlam Centre Sdn Bhd) is a think tank which focuses on security and socio-political matters. IMAN Research is spearheaded by experts with extensive local and international experience in the areas of management consultancy, social policy development, community resilience and engagement, particularly in the area of security, electoral reform, participatory urban redevelopment and psycho-social intervention within communities in conflict. We concentrate in the domains of peace and security, ethnic relations and religious harmony. We aim to deliver sound policy solutions along with implementable action plans with measurable outcomes. To date, we have worked with Malaysian and foreign governments as well as the private sectors and international bodies, such as Google, UNICEF, UNDP and USAID, on issues ranging from security, elections to civil society empowerment. www.imanresearch.com editorial letter We are entering an exciting month, September: Sabah will hold state elections on September In this issue: 26, 2020, and Sabahans and Malaysians are looking at the elections with great eagerness. Last month itself saw Musa Aman, the former 63rd Merdeka: Sabah Chief Minister, disputing the dissolution Still in Search of A of state legislative assembly by the incumbent 1 Chief Minister and subsequently filing a Malaysian Identity lawsuit against the state’s Governor, TYT Juhar Mahiruddin, and to his shock, failed. In fact, this year itself saw Malaysians reeling Approaching Sabah State from so many political upheavals, even during the MCO when Covid 19 hit the whole world, 2 Elections that we are fed up. -
DEWAN RAKYAT Standing Orders of the DEWAN RAKYAT
PARLIMEN MALAYSIA Peraturan-peraturan Majlis Mesyuarat DEWAN RAKYAT Standing Orders of the DEWAN RAKYAT PARLIMEN MALAYSIA Peraturan-peraturan Majlis Mesyuarat DEWAN RAKYAT Standing Orders of the DEWAN RAKYAT PARLIAMENT OF MALAYSIA Standing Orders of the DEWAN RAKYAT Fourteenth Publication June, 2018 DICETAK OLEH PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BERHAD KUALA LUMPUR, 2018 www.printnasional.com.my email: [email protected] Tel.: 03-92366895 Faks: 03-92224773 165 STANDING ORDERS OF THE DEWAN RAKYAT These Standing Orders are made by the Dewan Rakyat in pursuance of Article 62(1) of the Federal Constitution. 166 TABLE OF CONTENTS PUBLIC BUSINESS Standing Page Order 1. Proceedings of First Meetings of the House 175 after a General Election 2. Seating of Members 176 3. Election of a Yang di-Pertua 177 4. Procedure for election of Yang di-Pertua 177 4A. Leader of the House and Leader of the 179 Opposition 5. The Oath 180 6. Election of Timbalan Yang di-Pertua 181 7. Tuan Yang di-Pertua 181 8. Official Language 183 9. Duties of the Setiausaha 183 10. Official Reports 184 11. Sessions and Meetings 185 12. Sittings 186 13. Quorum 186 14. Order of Business 188 14A. Order of Business Special Chamber 190 15. Arrangement of Public Business 190 16. Special Chamber 190 17. Motion on Government Matter of Administration 192 18. Motion for Definite Matter of Urgent 193 Public Importance 19. Petitions 194 20. Papers 196 21. Questions 197 22. Notice of Questions 198 23. Contents of Questions 199 167 Standing Page Order 24. Manner of asking and answering questions 202 24A. -
Federal-State Relations Under the Pakatan Harapan Government
FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONS UNDER THE PAKATAN HARAPAN GOVERNMENT Tricia Yeoh TRENDS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA ISSN 0219-3213 TRS12/20s ISSUE ISBN 978-9-814951-13-5 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace 12 Singapore 119614 http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg 9 7 8 9 8 1 4 9 5 1 1 3 5 2020 TRENDS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA 20-J07166 01 Trends_2020-12.indd 1 5/10/20 2:25 PM The ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute (formerly Institute of Southeast Asian Studies) is an autonomous organization established in 1968. It is a regional centre dedicated to the study of socio-political, security, and economic trends and developments in Southeast Asia and its wider geostrategic and economic environment. The Institute’s research programmes are grouped under Regional Economic Studies (RES), Regional Strategic and Political Studies (RSPS), and Regional Social and Cultural Studies (RSCS). The Institute is also home to the ASEAN Studies Centre (ASC), the Singapore APEC Study Centre and the Temasek History Research Centre (THRC). ISEAS Publishing, an established academic press, has issued more than 2,000 books and journals. It is the largest scholarly publisher of research about Southeast Asia from within the region. ISEAS Publishing works with many other academic and trade publishers and distributors to disseminate important research and analyses from and about Southeast Asia to the rest of the world. 20-J07166 01 Trends_2020-12.indd 2 5/10/20 2:25 PM FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONS UNDER THE PAKATAN HARAPAN GOVERNMENT Tricia Yeoh ISSUE 12 2020 20-J07166 01 Trends_2020-12.indd 3 5/10/20 2:25 PM Published by: ISEAS Publishing 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119614 [email protected] http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg © 2020 ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore All rights reserved. -
235 Malaysias Coming Election
MALAYSIA’S COMING ELECTION: BEYOND COMMUNALISM? Asia Report N°235 – 1 October 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. MALAYSIA’S COMMUNAL POLITICS ...................................................................... 2 A. THE 1969 RIOTS .......................................................................................................................... 3 B. POLITICAL GAME CHANGERS ....................................................................................................... 4 1. Expanding middle class ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Competition over Islam ................................................................................................................ 5 3. Manipulation of Sino-Malay tensions .......................................................................................... 6 4. Reformasi and the growth of civil society ................................................................................... 7 III. THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 8 IV. THE BERSIH MOVEMENT ......................................................................................... 10 V. THE ISSUES ...................................................................................................................