Molecular Phylogenetics and Historical Biogeography of the Tribe Chiococceae (Rubiaceae) Sushil Kumar Paudyal Old Dominion University
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Spring 2015 Molecular Phylogenetics and Historical Biogeography of the Tribe Chiococceae (Rubiaceae) Sushil Kumar Paudyal Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, Botany Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Paudyal, Sushil K.. "Molecular Phylogenetics and Historical Biogeography of the Tribe Chiococceae (Rubiaceae)" (2015). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/v377-hr74 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/72 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE TRIBE CHIOCOCCEAE (RUBIACEAE) by Sushil Kumar Paudyal B.Sc. December 1996, Tribhuvan University, Nepal M.Sc. August 2000, Tribhuvan University, Nepal A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY May 2015 LyttonT Musselman (Director) Rebecca D. Bray (Member) Piero G. Delprete (Member) Tatyana A. Lobova (Member) ABSTRACT MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE CHIOCOCCEAE (RUBIACEAE) Sushil Kumar Paudyal Old Dominion University, 2015 Director: Dr. Lytton J. Musselman Chiococceae are a monophyletic assemblage of morphologically very diverse groups of plants ranging in habit from subshrubs to shrubs to tall trees exhibiting an astonishing variation in shapes and sizes of corolla, and kinds of fruits and seeds. They are primarily distributed in the Neotropics but also occur in the West Pacific islands; thus exhibiting amphi-Pacific tropical disjunction. This study addresses the phylogenetic relationships and biogeography of the Chiococceae using molecular DNA sequence data, and presents novel data on the tribal and generic delimitations, intergeneric relationships, and the origin and dispersal of this group. In the most recent tribal delimitations within subfamily Cinchonoideae, Strumpfia, a monotypic genus with historically uncertain tribal affiliation, is included in tribe Chiococceae despite distinctly differing morphologically from the rest of the genera in Chiococceae. Based on intertribal genetic divergences in the subfamily Cinchonoideae, analyzed in this study, coupled with morphological and palynological data, is transferred to a new monotypic tribe Strumpfieae; concurrently tribe Chiococceae is re-delimited to include 29 genera. This study presents the most comprehensive molecular phylogeny, to date, of the Chiococceae that includes 126 species and 27 genera and enables better understanding of taxonomic affinities and evolutionary relationships within the tribe. Based on the phylogenies generated by analyzing molecular sequence data of two nuclear (ETS, ITS) and two chloroplast(petD, trnL-F) regions using Bayesian inference and maximum parsimony frameworks, a total of nine new taxonomic changes are proposed- generic recognition for five new genera, and synonymization and new combinations for three genera (Ceuthocarpus, Morierina, and Phyllacanthus) and two species ofChiococca (C. plowmanii and C. naiguatensis). Historical events of origin, diversification and disjunction in Chiococceae were inferred with the help of molecular dating analysis using BEAST and ancestral area reconstruction using S-DIVA and BBM. Results indicate that tribe Chiococceae originated in Mexico in the Eocene and through subsequent dispersal, vicariance, and extinction events dispersed to the current distribution in the Neotropics. Multiple dispersal events to the Caribbean and back to Mexico and Central America are inferred. Two Mid-Miocene long-distance dispersal events from the Greater Antilles, one to the New Caledonia and another to other islands of the West Pacific, resulted in the amphi- Pacific tropical disjunction in the Chiococceae. This dissertation is dedicated to three great souls, who left for eternity during my PhD program, and without whose blessings I would not have been what I am today- Indramani Paudyal, my father; John B. Tyson, sponsor and my High School Headmaster; and Timothy J. Motley, my PhD Advisor. May their souls rest in peace. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A great many people have shared their time and expertise to assist me during this project and I heartily thank them all. I am greatly indebted to the late Tim Motley, my major advisor, not only for his assistance, training and mentorship, but also for believing in me and giving me the opportunity of a lifetime. I am grateful to Lytton Musselman for his guidance over the years; more importantly for accepting to be my advisor upon untimely demise of Tim Motley. Piero Delprete provided great mentorship and I cannot thank him enough for invaluable support while writing my dissertation. I am thankful to Rebecca Bray and Tatyana Lobova for serving on my committee, and being there for me during my low times, encouraging me and boosting my morale. I thank Wayne Hynes, Chair, and other Biological Sciences faculty, staff and students who have provided assistance and have been part of my graduate life. Qing-Feng Wang, Jay Bolin, Mohammad Al-Zein, Marcus Jones, and Suman Neupane have been instrumental at various stages of my graduate program. I thank fellow coworkers- David Ingersoll, Hunter Shanks, Kenny Parker, Peter Schafran, Tim Hammer, Tony Mathews, and Rachel Jabaily for their assistance and camaraderie. I am also grateful for the assistance of curators of various herbaria and the staff of ODU Inter library loan services. I gratefully acknowledge the financial support from ODU in the form of University fellowships and Graduate assistantships, the Marshall scholarship, Nick Savage scholarship, and the Stiffler endowment, without which this work would not have been possible. I also take this opportunity to thank all my friends, colleagues, and family that have always supported me. Finally, I thank my wife Samjhana and daughter Shreya for their patience and putting up with me. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................. ix LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................ x Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ I SPECIFIC A IM S................................................................................................. 6 2. TRIBAL POSITION OF STRUMPFIA AND RE-DELIMITATION OF THE TRIBE CHIOCOCCEAE............................................................................................. 7 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 7 MATERIALS AND METHODS........................................................................ 10 TAXON SAMPLING................................................................................ 10 SEQUENCING.......................................................................................... 10 PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES.............................................................. 11 RESULTS............................................................................................................ 12 DISCUSSION...................................................................................................... 19 TAXONOMIC TREATMENT................................................................. 21 3. PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE TRIBE CHIOCOCCEAE AND NEW GENERIC DELIMITATIONS............................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 23 TAXONOMIC HISTORY OF CHIOCOCCEAE................................... 24 MATERIALS AND METHODS......................................................................... 30 TAXON SAMPLING................................................................................ 30 SEQUENCING.......................................................................................... 30 PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES.............................................................. 31 RESULTS............................................................................................................ 34 SEQUENCES AND DATASETS............................................................ 34 PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES.............................................................. 36 INCONSISTENCIES AMONG TREES FROM DIFFERENT ANALYSES................................................................................................ 38 DISCUSSION...................................................................................................... 39 GENERAL TOPOLOGY OF THE PHYLOGENY............................... 40 NAMING AND DELIMITATING THE TRIBE.................................... 41 THE COUTAPORTLA-LORENCEA CLADE......................................... 42 THE EXOSTEMA -SOLENANDRA-COUTAREA -HINTONI A CLADE......................................................................................................