DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—Senate S7418

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record—Senate S7418 S7418 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE June 11, 2007 same as the Senator who is expressed The bill we begin debate on today— amendment before any additional on page 24 of Roll Call, saying we have the Renewable Fuels, Consumer Pro- amendments are offered on this bill. to overcome the 15-vote deficit, it tection Energy Efficiency Act of 2007— I hope my colleagues will vote in won’t happen. We have about maxed takes several major steps toward re- favor of the motion to proceed. In fact, out at 80 percent. ducing our dependence on foreign oil, I hope we can proceed to the bill imme- The letter I am going to send to the promoting renewable energy that we diately and not have to use the 30 President will say a number of things. produce right here in America, and pro- hours. That will allow time for more Among other things, it will say: tecting our environment from global amendments. A strong spirit of bipartisanship has held warming. This bill is a substitute to f together the coalition of Democrats and Re- H.R. 6. This bill is a bipartisan bill. publicans who negotiated the compromise A number of my chairmen came to RECOGNITION OF THE MINORITY and has sustained the Senate through 2 full me and said: We have this great legisla- LEADER weeks of debate on the bill. Unfortunately, tion in my committee; can we bring it that bipartisanship was largely absent in a The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- crucial vote last Thursday. forward? I said: No, we have to have an pore. The minority leader is recog- energy bill; our initial energy bill has nized. Then I will go on to state to the to be bipartisan. So the Energy Com- f President the percentages I just out- mittee, under the direction of Senators lined. BINGAMAN and DOMENICI, came up with IMMIGRATION I further say in the letter to the a good package. That is part of what President: Mr. MCCONNELL. Mr. President, just we are going to be debating in the Sen- a brief word about the immigration We appreciate the efforts of you and other ate. Republicans who have worked with us to get bill. We could have been wrapping it up the bill this far. But we believe it will take Then, in the Commerce Committee, tonight. stronger leadership by you to ensure that op- Senator STEVENS and Senator INOUYE As I indicated to my good friend, the ponents of the bill do not block the path to also came up with an extremely impor- majority leader, on Thursday after- final passage. Simply put, we need many tant piece of legislation dealing with noon, I thought there was every reason more than seven Republicans to vote for clo- CAFE standards, which is making cars to believe we could have finished the ture and final passage of the bill. more efficient. That is going to be in immigration bill by tonight. Instead, This letter will be signed by Senators the bill to be brought to the floor. we ended up having another cloture REID, DURBIN, SCHUMER, and MURRAY, Senator BOXER and Senator INHOFE vote—in my view, a day or two pre- the Democratic leadership team. also worked together to come up with mature—taking Friday off, and today I want to get the bill done. The over- another piece of legislation that we spending our time on a meaningless whelming majority of the Democratic have put in this one bill. Their part of resolution giving the President advice caucus has already voted for cloture. this bill is also excellent and deals with about whom the Attorney General The American people are certainly green buildings and making the mas- ought to be. looking to Congress for leadership. We sive fleet of Federal cars more energy Having said that, I appreciate the hope President Bush and his Repub- efficient. It is a good piece of legisla- comments of the majority leader that lican allies in Congress will find a way tion, and it is a bipartisan bill. he would like to finish the immigra- There will be people wanting to put to work with us to deliver this bill to tion bill. There is a substantial number tax measures on this, but I think we the immigrants, businesses, and all of Republican Senators who believe should wait until the tax committee— other Americans who deserve it. this bill would be an improvement over If we see new cooperation and a clear Senators BAUCUS and GRASSLEY—does the current situation, over the status way forward from the Republican cau- that. This is a bill which we should try quo, and so I hope we will be able to cus, I will do everything possible to re- to protect the bipartisan aspect of. It chart a path to get us back on track at address the immigration issue after the really is quite a good bill, and if we are some point and hopefully complete, on debate on the Energy bill is completed. able to pass it, we will save 4 million a bipartisan basis, what could well be And it is difficult for me to even say barrels of oil every day. That is pretty the most important domestic achieve- this because I really wanted to move good. ment of this Congress. next to the Defense authorization bill. This bill will set new energy effi- I am pleased to hear the majority If we can work out something, when we ciency standards for lighting, appli- leader say there is a possibility that we finish this Energy bill, to complete im- ances, and water use. This bill alone could get back to this measure and migration, I want to do that. will save 1⁄2 trillion gallons of water wrap it up. That certainly is my hope, Finally, Mr. President, on energy, we every year. For a place like Nevada, and I will look forward to working with will turn our focus this week to one of where we get 4 inches of rain every him toward that end. the great remaining challenges of our year in Las Vegas, that is a lot of I yield the floor. time: our national energy policy. water. In 1931, Thomas Alva Edison had a This is a bill which protects con- f meeting with Henry Ford, whose cars sumers by punishing companies that RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME were driving up consumer demand for price gouge and manipulate supply for gasoline. This is what Edison told their profits. It is a bill which invests The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- Ford: in carbon capture and storage, and it pore. Under the previous order, the leadership time is reserved. I’d put my money on the sun and solar en- directs the President and his Cabinet ergy. What a source of power! I hope we don’t to improve diplomatic relations with f have to wait until oil and coal run out before our energy partners in order to give us MORNING BUSINESS we tackle that. more leverage in the global energy Here it is, 76 years later—76 years market. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- later—and we haven’t tackled our ad- Altogether, this bill will save Amer- pore. Under the previous order, there diction to oil, and it has grown into a ican consumers tens of billions of dol- will be a period for the transaction of three-pronged crisis: threatening our lars every year, cut our oil consump- morning business until 3:30 p.m., with economy, threatening our Nation’s se- tion, reduce our dependence on foreign Senators permitted to speak for up to curity, and threatening our environ- energy, and, by the way, might just 10 minutes each, with the time equally ment. save the planet while we are at it. divided and controlled between the two Today, we will use 21 million barrels It is a good, important bill, a bipar- leaders or their designees. of oil and tomorrow the same. How tisan bill, and as I have indicated, The Senator from North Dakota. much is 21 million barrels of oil? It is many of my colleagues will be tempted f a ditch 10 feet deep and 200 football to offer tax amendments. I ask that fields long or a ditch 10 feet deep and 11 they wait until the Finance Committee ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALES miles long. Every day, we use that oil— has had an opportunity to make rec- Mr. CONRAD. Mr. President, I rise every day. ommendations on an energy tax today to discuss the issues surrounding VerDate Mar 15 2010 21:51 Mar 13, 2014 Jkt 081600 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\2007SENATE\S11JN7.REC S11JN7 mmaher on DSKCGSP4G1 with SOCIALSECURITY June 11, 2007 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S7419 the removal of eight U.S. attorneys sons for their dismissal. Here we have The reasons given for their firings have not last year. Attorney General Gonzales them. been consistent with my experience. has claimed that he had no involve- David Iglesias, New Mexico—there And that: ment in the firing of the U.S. attor- was a probe of Democrats not com- I had very positive encounters with these neys. In fact, this is his statement. He pleted quickly enough. We had promi- folks. said: nent Republicans complaining that he Comey was effusive in his praise of several of the fired prosecutors. I was not involved in seeing any memos, had not reached conclusion on a probe was not involved in any discussions about of Democrats quickly enough.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2007 No. 47 Senate The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was appoint the Honorable MARK L. PRYOR, a After all, this was a President who called to order by the Honorable MARK Senator from the State of Arkansas, to per- won two elections by the barest of mar- L. PRYOR, a Senator from the State of form the duties of the Chair. gins, first by the Supreme Court. Yet Arkansas. ROBERT C. BYRD, after 9/11, instead of uniting the coun- President pro tempore. try, he has chosen to push the envelope PRAYER Mr. PRYOR thereupon assumed the of his authority. On everything from The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- chair as Acting President pro tempore. the runup to the war in Iraq, to the fered the following prayer: f plan to destroy Social Security, to the Let us pray: RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY use of warrantless wiretapping, this ad- Lord, You have promised to work for LEADER ministration has governed without the good of those who love You. Work compromise. in the lives of our lawmakers, The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- The political purge of U.S. attorneys strengthening them for every problem, pore. The majority leader is recog- is only the latest example of this Presi- trial, and temptation they face. Open nized. dent’s unhealthy disregard for checks their eyes to see Your hand at work f and balances.
    [Show full text]
  • Depoliticizing the Interim Appointments of US Attorneys
    LIVE AND LEARN: DEPOLITICIZING THE INTERIM APPOINTMENTS OF U.S. ATTORNEYS t Laurie L. Levenson The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.' I. INTRODUCTION U.S. Attorneys play a special role in our federal criminal justice system. As the representatives of the federal government, they have the responsibility of enforcing federal laws in their respective districts.2 3 Although U.S. Attorneys serve "at the pleasure of the President," the4 goal is to have a fair and impartial prosecutor administering the laws. The recent firing of eight U.S. Attorneys has called into question at- tempts to politicize the role of this vital Office. By attempting to give the Attorney General the power to make indefinite interim appointments, I Professor of Law, William M. Rains Fellow & Director, Center for Ethical Advocacy, Loyola Law School. Thank you to John McKay, a man of true integrity, for inviting me to participate in the Symposium at Seattle University School of Law. His courage, as well as that of his fellow U.S. Attorneys, Paul Carlton, David Iglesias, Bill Cummins III, and Carol Lam, should serve as an inspi- ration for others dedicated to public service. I also wish to extend my gratitude to the editors of the Seattle University Law Review and to my wonderful research assistants, Emil Petrossian, Lindsay Meurs, William Smyth, and Mary Gordon.
    [Show full text]
  • Unofficial Transcript
    1 RPTS JOHNSON DCMN BURRELL COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, WASHINGTON, D.C. UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT INTERVIEW OF: KARL C. ROVE Tuesday, July 7, 2009 Washington, D.C. The interview in the above matter was held at 2138 Conference Room, Rayburn House Office Building, commencing at 9:00 a.m. 2 Appearances: For COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: ADAM B. SCHIFF, MAJORITY MEMBER J. RANDY FORBES, MINORITY MEMBER ELLIOT MINCBERG, MAJORITY CHIEF COUNSEL - INVESTIGATIONS AND OVERSIGHT ERIC TAMARKIN, MAJORITY COUNSEL SAM BRODERICK-SOKOL, MAJORITY OVERSIGHT COUNSEL PHIL TAHTAKRAN, LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR FOR CONGRESSMAN SCHIFF DANIEL M. FLORES, CHIEF MINORITY COUNSEL, SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW RICHARD ALAN HERTLING, REPUBLICAN DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF/POLICY DIRECTOR CRYSTAL ROBERTS JEZIERSKI, REPUBLICAN CHIEF OVERSIGHT COUNSEL ZACHARY N. SOMERS, MINORITY COUNSEL WILL HUPMAN, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT FOR CONGRESSMAN FORBES 3 For MR. ROVE: ROBERT D. LUSKIN, ESQ. KATIE BIBER, ESQ. Patton Boggs LLP Attorneys at Law 2550 M Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20037-1350 For FORMER PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY: EMMET T. FLOOD, ESQ. Attorney at Law Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 For WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL'S OFFICE: JASON GREEN, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL CHRIS WEIDEMAN, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL BLAKE ROBERTS, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL For JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: 4 JOHN R. TYLER, CIVIL DIVISION 5 Mr. Schiff. We are here this morning for a transcribed interview of former White House official Karl Rove, pursuant to the March 4th, 2009 Agreement of Accommodation between the House Judiciary Committee and the former Bush administration. Mr. Rove, please state your full name and address for the record.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecutor Fired So Ex-Rove Aide Could Get His Job ~Ttaclimenb:Cummins Letter Re Griffin.Pdf
    Page 1 of 2 Sampson, Kyle From: Sampson, Kyle Sent: Wednesday, February 07,2007 10:26 AM To: 'Sara Taylor' Subject: RE: USAT - Prosecutor fired so ex-Rove aide could get his job ~ttaclimenb:Cummins letter re Griffin.pdf I was thinking of a different approach, to wit: we are working to get Cummins to submit a letter (or op-ed) that says (1) everyone knew that I'd been looking since 2004 to leave the office for the private sector, (2) when I was contacted about moving on I agreed that it made sense, and (3) Tim Griffin is an outstanding U.S. Attorney who - did tremendous work in the office as an AUSA (see the Cummins letter to Griffin dated August 13,2002,see attached), who has more prosecution experience that I have now, and who should be supported for confirmation by Sen. Pryor and Sen. Lincoln. From: Sara Taylor [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 07,2007 10:09 AM To: Sampson, Kyle Subject: FW: USAT - Prosecutor fired so ex-Rove aide could get his job I normally don't like attacking our friends, but since Bud Cummins is talking to everyone - why don't we tell the deal on him? Frdm: White House News Update [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 6:38 AM To: Soper, Steven W. Subject: USAT - Prosecutor fired so ex-Rove aide could get his job Prosecutor fired so ex-Rove aide could get his job By Kevin Johnson, USA TODAY WASHINGTON - The Justice Department acknowledged Tuesday that it fired the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Removal of Nine U.S
    U.S. Department of Justice An Investigation into the Removal of Nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006 U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Office of Professional Responsibility September 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 I. Methodology of the Investigation ....................................................... 2 II. Organization of this Report ............................................................... 4 CHAPTER TWO BACKGROUND.................................................................. 7 I. U.S. Attorneys .................................................................................. 7 II. Selection of U.S. Attorneys................................................................ 8 III. Department Evaluation and Interaction with U.S. Attorneys ............. 9 IV. Backgrounds of Department Officials.............................................. 10 A. Alberto Gonzales ................................................................... 11 B. Kyle Sampson ....................................................................... 11 C. Monica Goodling ................................................................... 11 D. Paul McNulty ........................................................................ 12 E. Michael Elston ...................................................................... 12 F. David Margolis ...................................................................... 13 G. William Mercer .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sarnpson, Kyle
    Page 1 of I Sarnpson, Kyle From: Scott-Finan, Nancy Sent: Thursday, February 08,20071 :25 PM To: Sarnpson, Kyle; Goodling, Monica; Elston, Michael (ODAG); Moschella, William; Hertling, Richard; Seidel, Rebecca; Scolinos, Tasia Cc: Cabral, Catalina; Long, Linda E; Green, Saralene E Subject: FW:Letter to Gonzales 2.8.07 Attachments: Docurnent.pdf Senator Schurner's press secretary just ernailed me this SchurnerlReidlDurbinlMurrayletter with regard to CurnrninslGriffin. WASHINGTON, DC 20510 February 8,2007 The Honorable Alberto R. Gem-ales Attorney General of the United States U .S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Dear Attorney Gend Gonzales: As you know, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing this week to examine the growing politicization of the hiring and firing of United States Attorneys, our nation's top federal prosecutors. Unfortunately, the hearing only served to intensify, rather than assuage, our concerns, particdarly given the circumstances surrounding the ouster of Bud Curnnins, who was the U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of Arkansas until lasf December. When you testified before the Committee on January 18,2007, .you slated uncquivacally that you'5wauld never, ever make a change in a U.5. ASorney position far political reasons." In a stuukqg admission, however, Deputy Agarney Gene- McNulty, in his own testimony on February 6', acknowledgedbt Mr. Cutnmins was pushed out for no mason other thqta install - without Senate conairmation - Tim (irifin, a former aide to Karl Rove;) At the time, Mr. Griffin had minimal fe?deral porntian experience, but was highly skilled in opposition research and paraisan attacks for the Republican National Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Duke Law Scholarship Repository Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys Sara Sun Beale* The reputation and credibility of the Department of Justice were badly tarnished during the Bush administration. This article focuses on concerns regarding the role of partisan politics.1 Critics charge that during the Bush administration improper partisan political considerations pervasively influenced a wide range of decisions including the selection of immigration judges, summer interns and line attorneys; the assignment of career attorneys to particular details; the evaluation of the performance of United States Attorneys; and the decision whether and when to file charges in cases with political ramifications. The Inspector General’s lengthy and highly critical reports have substantiated some of these charges.2 The first two Inspector General (IG) Reports found that the Department improperly used political criteria in hiring and assigning some immigration judges, interns, and career prosecutors.3 The third report * Charles L.B. Lowndes Professor, Duke Law School, Durham, N.C. I would like to acknowledge the outstanding research assistance provided by Michael Devlin, Meghan Ferguson, Amy Taylor, and Molly Brownfield, and the helpful comments of Norman Abrams, Albert Alschuler, Rachel Barkow, Anthony Barkow, Candace Carroll, Colm Connolly, Ronald Goldstock, Bruce Green, Lisa Kern Griffin, James Jacobs, Susan Klein, Daniel Richman, and Adam Safwat. Of course any errors are my own. 1 Other serious concerns about the Department have been raised, particularly in connection with its role in the war on terror. For example, the Department has been the subject of intense criticism for legal analysis that led to the authorization of brutal interrogation techniques for detainees.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Department of Justice Politicizing the Hiring and Firing of U.S
    S. HRG. 110–61 PRESERVING PROSECUTORIAL INDEPENDENCE: IS THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE POLITICIZING THE HIRING AND FIRING OF U.S. ATTORNEYS? HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION FEBRUARY 6, 2007 Serial No. J–110–10 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 35–798 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:41 Jun 19, 2007 Jkt 035798 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\35798.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JON KYL, Arizona RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JOHN CORNYN, Texas BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island TOM COBURN, Oklahoma BRUCE A. COHEN, Chief Counsel and Staff Director MICHAEL O’NEILL, Republican Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:41 Jun 19, 2007 Jkt 035798 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\35798.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Feingold, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardball Vs. Beanball: Identifying Fundamentally Antidemocratic Tactics
    COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW ONLINE VOL. 119 APRIL 2, 2019 PAGES 85–122 HARDBALL VS. BEANBALL: IDENTIFYING FUNDAMENTALLY ANTIDEMOCRATIC TACTICS Jed Handelsman Shugerman * The “constitutional hardball” metaphor used by legal scholars and political scientists illuminates an important phenomenon in American politics, but it obscures a crisis in American democracy. In baseball, hardball encompasses legitimate tactics: pitching inside to brush a batter back but not injure, hard slides, hard tags. Baseball fans celebrate hardball. Many of the constitutional hardball maneuvers previously identified by scholars have been legitimate, if aggressive, constitutional political moves. But the label “hardball” has been interpreted too broadly to include illegitimate, fundamentally undemocratic tactics. I suggest a different baseball metaphor for such tactics: beanball, pitches meant to injure and knock out the opposing player, against the basic rules of the game. In this Reply to Fishkin, Pozen, and Bernstein, I first address Bernstein’s examples of President Barack Obama and Democrats engaging in hardball. I note that Fishkin and Pozen’s “asymmetry” thesis acknowledged clearly that Democrats play hardball, even if not as aggressively as Republicans have. I discuss government shutdowns, birtherism, debt ceiling threats, abuses of the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the contrasting manipulations leading to the Iraq War versus the Iran nuclear deal. This Reply then identifies examples of Republicans’ fundamentally antidemocratic beanball: voter ID laws and other voting restrictions, extreme gerrymandering, marginalizing racial minorities, and abusing the DOJ. Beanball’s destructive politics reflect racial status anxiety, paranoia, and a panic over dispossession and the loss of historical privilege. * Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Investigation of the US Attorney Firings in 2006
    School of Economic, Political and Policy Studies Haphazard, Systematic, or Both? An Empirical Investigation of the US Attorney Firings in 2006 UT Dallas Author(s): Banks Miller Rights: ©2018 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved. Citation: Miller, Banks and Brett Curry, "Haphazard, Systematic, or Both? An Empirical Investigation of the US Attorney Firings in 2006," Journal of Law and Courts 6, no. 2 (Fall 2018): 379-403. This document is being made freely available by the Eugene McDermott Library of the University of Texas at Dallas with permission of the copyright owner. All rights are reserved under United States copyright law unless specified otherwise. Haphazard, Systematic, or Both? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE US ATTORNEY FIRINGS IN 2006 BANKS MILLER, University of Texas at Dallas BRETT CURRY, Georgia Southern University ABSTRACT In 2006, the Bush administration directed nine US attorneys to resign. This decision was a partial cause of the attorney general’s departure from the administration, and it prompted investigations and congressional hearings. Seen as largely ad hoc, we argue that theory predicts a more systematic decision-making process. We investigate this empirically and find, consistent with literature on principal-agent theories and bureau- cracy, that performance on easily monitored metrics and adverse-selection concerns predict the firings. We explore the implications of these findings for efforts to centralize decision-making in the Department of Justice and to exert political control over US attorneys. As the federal government’s principal litigators, US attorneys (USAs) occupy a central role in the justice system.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Wreck at the Justice Department: an Eyewitness Account
    Train Wreck at the Justice Department: An Eyewitness Account John McKay † In a series of early morning phone calls on December 7, 2006, seven United States Attorneys were ordered to resign. Despite initial denials, it would later be revealed that two other U.S. Attorneys had also been ordered to submit their resignations, bringing the total number to nine. Each was given no explanation for the dismissal and most were led to believe that they alone were being dismissed, raising the specter of unstated wrongdoing and encouraging silent departures. Those dis- missed uniformly cited the maxim that they “served at the pleasure of the President” and most sought to avoid publicly disputing the Justice De- partment or the White House. So what happened? Why were the nine dismissed? Were political considerations allowed to trump the proud heritage of non-partisan, inde- pendent prosecutions in a Justice Department widely trusted as the guardian of civil rights? Did the White House or senior Justice Depart- ment officials direct the removal of U.S. Attorneys for failing to satisfy local partisans or to retaliate for certain public corruption prosecutions? Have officials lied to cover up wrongdoing and to avoid criminal prose- cution? Can the damage to the Justice Department be undone, restoring the role of federal prosecutors as disdainful of politics and devoted to accountability, fairness, and the firm execution of the nation’s laws? These questions were the subject of a public forum on May 9, 2007, sponsored by Seattle University School of Law, and serve in part as the basis for this Article by one of the participants of the forum (and a fired U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S7419
    June 11, 2007 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S7419 the removal of eight U.S. attorneys sons for their dismissal. Here we have The reasons given for their firings have not last year. Attorney General Gonzales them. been consistent with my experience. has claimed that he had no involve- David Iglesias, New Mexico—there And that: ment in the firing of the U.S. attor- was a probe of Democrats not com- I had very positive encounters with these neys. In fact, this is his statement. He pleted quickly enough. We had promi- folks. said: nent Republicans complaining that he Comey was effusive in his praise of several of the fired prosecutors. I was not involved in seeing any memos, had not reached conclusion on a probe was not involved in any discussions about of Democrats quickly enough. Comey was the Deputy Attorney what was going on. That’s basically what I Carol Lamm, in California—she se- General, and he described Paul knew as the Attorney General. cured the conviction of a Republican Charlton of Arizona as ‘‘ one of the That is really a stunning claim. His Congressman, also had indicted the No. best.’’ He said he had a very positive own Chief of Staff, Kyle Sampson, ad- 3 official at the CIA, and was inves- view of David Iglesias of New Mexico, mitted the Attorney General misled tigating a Republican Congressman. and called Daniel Ogden of Las Vegas the country. He is not alone. Kyle Daniel Ogden, Nevada—investigated ‘‘straight as a Nevada highway and a Sampson, former Chief of Staff to the a Republican Governor and former Re- fired-up guy.’’ Attorney General, said: publican Congressman.
    [Show full text]