Pdf (Accessed March 25, 2013)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Towards an African Inculturation Biblical Pneumatology: a Response to the Rise of Neo- Pentecostalism in Tanzanian Christianity Faith Lugazia Luther Seminary
Luther Seminary Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary Doctor of Philosophy Theses Student Theses 2010 Towards an African Inculturation Biblical Pneumatology: A Response to the Rise of Neo- Pentecostalism in Tanzanian Christianity Faith Lugazia Luther Seminary Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/phd_theses Part of the Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the New Religious Movements Commons Recommended Citation Lugazia, Faith, "Towards an African Inculturation Biblical Pneumatology: A Response to the Rise of Neo-Pentecostalism in Tanzanian Christianity" (2010). Doctor of Philosophy Theses. Paper 15. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctor of Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TOWARDS AN AFRICAN INCULTURATION BIBLICAL PNEUMATOLOGY: A RESPONSE TO THE RISE OF NEO-PENTECOSTALISM IN TANZANIAN CHRISTIANITY by FAITH LUGAZIA A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Luther Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 2010 LUTHER SEMINARY LIBRARY 2375 Como Avenue 8 t P*ul, MN 65108-144? © 2010 by Faith Lugazia All rights reserved LUTHER SEMINARY ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA PH.D. THESIS Title of Thesis: Towards An African Inculturation of Biblical Pneumatology: A Response to the Rise of Neo-Pentecostalism in Tanzanian Christianity. Author: Faith Kokubelwa Lugazia Thesis committee: L . jA JL a- ABSTRACT Towards an African Inculturation Biblical Pneumatology: A Response to the Rise ofNeo- Pentecostalism in Tanzanian Christianity By Faith Lugazia In this dissertation, 1 seek to lay the groundwork for developing an African inculturation of biblical pneumatology relevant to the Tanzanian context. -
Lutherans Respond to Pentecostalism
TLC 4 TLC THEOLOgy in thE LifE OF thE Church Vol. 4 The spread and influence of diverse expressions of Pentecostalism through out the world, especially in Africa, is posing significant challenges to Lutheran as well as other churches. At a seminar of the Lutheran World Federation in South Africa, theologians discussed how they are responding to these challenges. Articles in this book highlight how some Lutheran convictions to Respond Pentecostalism Lutherans and understandings can counter, balance or expand upon Pentecostal beliefs and practices. Contributors include: J. Kwabena Asamoah-Gyadu, Ghana; Ibrahim Bitrus, Nigeria; Musawenkosi Biyela, South Africa; Samuel Dawai, Cameroon; Hans-Peter Grosshans, Germany; Guillermo Hansen, Argentina/USA; Paul John Isaak, Namibia/Switzerland; Rogate Mshana, Tanzania/Switzerland; Sarojini Nadar, South Africa; Cheryl S. Pero, USA; Gertrud Tönsing, South Africa; and Galana Babusa Yako, Kenya. Lutherans Respond The editor, Karen L. Bloomquist, directs the Department for Theology and Studies, LWF, Geneva, Switzerland. to Pentecostalism LWF The Lutheran World Federation – A Communion of Churches ISBN (Europe) 978-3-905676-68-6 DTS-Studies-201002-text.indd 10 02/03/2011 15:55:18 PM Lutherans Respond to Pentecostalism edited by Karen L. Bloomquist on behalf of the Lutheran World Federation— A Communion of Churches Lutheran University Press Minneapolis, Minnesota Previous volumes in the Theology in the Life of the Church series Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.), Being the Church in the Midst of Empire. Trinitarian Reflections Simone Sinn (ed.), Deepening Faith, Hope and Love in Relations with Neighbors of Other Faiths Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.), Identity, Survival, Witness. Reconfiguring Theological Agendas Lutherans Respond to Pentecostalism Theology in the Life of the Church, vol. -
Healing Powers by God Two More Than 2,000 Persons Are Seated In,The Massive Tent Where Evangelist A
THE WQRLD-WIDE SALVATlQN-HEAL,!NG REVIVAL VOICE 0):THE NOVEMBER 1951 PRICE I , .I 15 CENTS i I I , 1 SIGNS == WONDERS == MIR'ACLES BLESS MULTITUDES---BAFFLE UNBELIEF I MIRACLE OF CLUB FOOT AND SkO NEWSPAPER VERIFIES M I MIRACLE ENABLES KENTUCKY ARM LEG AMAZES COM- ING AWAY BRACE AFT AND SPEAK MUNITY-(See "After" Pidure . (See page 2) (See page 74) and Testimony page 3) MAN HEALED OF BLINDNESS, DEAFNESS AND SKIN DISEASE IN TANNENBAUM CANADIAN NEWSPAPERS REPORT MIRACLES MEETING I had been blind since the age of 11 years. IN A. C. ’VALDEZ, JR. CAMPAIGN I am 34 years old. I had been treated as a (The arricle ag4earing below was taken verbatim from the VICTORIA TIMES and is but one of a number blind man, and my records are at the Uni- of friendiy articks abpem‘ng in that publication. This article was accombanied by the bhoto oy our cover show- versity of Minnesota Hospital, where I was ing the man casting uway his leg brace. The words gf the headline shown below are exactly as the newspafler operated on in 1940. The Blind Association is published them. However, none of our Evangelists lay claim io the ,term “Healer,” since Christ the only of Minnesota handled my case. I received Healer.) a blind pension. On the 24th of July, I was given the “blind News and Candy stand (vending stand) at the Hibbing Post Office. , Brother Tannenbaum prayed for me, and God instantly opened my eyes, and they are getting better all the time. I also was deaf MIRACLE ON QUADRA ST.? in my left ear, and that is also healed. -
The Prosperity Gospel of Coronavirus Response Paul A. Djupe, Denison
The Prosperity Gospel of Coronavirus Response Paul A. Djupe, Denison University Ryan P. Burge, Eastern Illinois University Abstract The sweep of the coronavirus pandemic across the world and United States offers an almost unparalleled opportunity to study how social systems cope with the threat and opportunities for collective action. In this paper we draw on survey data collected as the US flailed in response and before a general consensus among executive office-holders developed in the following weeks. In particular, we assess how holding prosperity gospel views strongly shaped perceptions of the virus and state responses to the virus. Research on the prosperity gospel is slowly expanding, and this paper helps to highlight some missing dimensions. At a time when concerted action for the social good could be uniting the country, prosperity gospel beliefs systematically undermine that possibility by augmenting threat, raising outgroup anxiety, and decreasing social trust. [129 words] Paper Submitted to Politics & Religion April 16, 2020 [6255 total words] “Satan and a virus will not stop us” –Rev. Tony Spell (qtd. in Seipel 2020) At the time of writing, the coronavirus is sweeping the world with over one million cases and tens of thousands dead; the United States tops both counts. In the face of the pandemic, some congregations are still meeting in person (or think they should be) with an apparent devil-may-care attitude. In this paper, we ask what drives reactions to the coronavirus, with a focus on one rapidly growing religious belief system – the Prosperity Gospel. This belief system is particularly well tuned to trigger a strong reaction to the societal response to the spread of the coronavirus. -
Reappropriating Luther's Two Kingdoms by CRAIG L
Reappropriating Luther's Two Kingdoms by CRAIG L. NESSAN n the Lutheran tradition the usual villain lurking behind apparent Ifailures to oppose political tyranny has been Martin Luther's teach ing on the "two kingdoms." The failure of the German Lutheran churches adequately to resist the Nazi regime and the quietism of the Lutheran church in the United States in relationship to political questions are but two examples of the apparent insufficiency of Luther s two kingdoms teaching. Moreover, questions can be raised about the adequacy of this political ethic for Luther himself, espe cially in light of his stance during the rebellion of the peasants and his writings against the Jews. Is it possible to re-appropriate Luther's two kingdoms teaching as a viable political ethic for the church in its ministry and mission at the beginning of the twenty-first cen tury?1 Walter Altmann has sketched four models that in various ways dis tort the relationship of church and state.2 First, there can be a sepa ration of church and state with a demonization of politics. This oc curs especially in theologies that focus on salvation as an escape from this evil world. Second, there can be separation of church and state whereby politics is understood to be autonomous from religious in fluence. This approach usually functions with a very positive esti mation of the political order as an instrument of God's creative and ordering power. Altmann cites not only Nazi Germany but also the prevailing view in the United States as examples of this model. -
ABSTRACT God's Faith-Healing Entrepreneur: Oral Roberts
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
Amos Yong Complete Curriculum Vitae
Y o n g C V | 1 AMOS YONG COMPLETE CURRICULUM VITAE Table of Contents PERSONAL & PROFESSIONAL DATA ..................................................................................... 2 Education ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Academic & Administrative Positions & Other Employment .................................................................... 3 Visiting Professorships & Fellowships ....................................................................................................... 3 Memberships & Certifications ................................................................................................................... 3 PUBLICATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 4 Monographs/Books – and Reviews Thereof.............................................................................................. 4 Edited Volumes – and Reviews Thereof .................................................................................................. 11 Co-edited Book Series .............................................................................................................................. 16 Missiological Engagements: Church, Theology and Culture in Global Contexts (IVP Academic) – with Scott W. Sunquist and John R. Franke ................................................................................................ -
The Lord's Prayer in Luther's Catechism
Word & World Volume 22, Number 1 Winter 2002 The Lord’s Prayer in Luther’s Catechism JAMES ARNE NESTINGEN S COMMONLY AS IT APPEARS IN PERSONAL DEVOTION AND THE LITURGICAL life of the church, the Lord’s Prayer draws surprisingly little theological atten- tion. Children raised in the Christian faith often learn it as the first full paragraph of their speech; if new Christians don’t get a full treatment in adult instruction, they quickly come to know the prayer as generations have, by saying it with the congregation in services or with those standing with them at the close of a meeting. Yet for all the prominence of the prayer, full theological treatments are not nearly as common as might be expected. I. RECENT SCHOLARSHIP This has not always been the case. The World War II generation of German theologians, perhaps just because of their experience, produced some classic stud- ies, most all of them published in English translations. Joachim Jeremias and Ernst Lohmeyer did full dress New Testament studies, Jeremias setting it in the context of first-century prayer, Lohmeyer paying particularly close attention to the escha- tology.1 Helmut Thielicke published a classic set of sermons on the Lord’s Prayer 1Joachim Jeremias, “The Lord’s Prayer in Light of Recent Research,” in The Prayers of Jesus, trans. John Reu- mann (London: SCM, 1967) 82-107; Ernest Lohmeyer, “Our Father”; An Introduction to the Lord’s Prayer, trans. John Bowden (New York: Harper & Row, 1965). Luther’s explanations of the Lord’s Prayer are not concerned primarily with cor- rect doctrine. -
The 'Evangelical' Heart of Pietist Anthony William Boehm
Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - Portland Seminary Portland Seminary 2016 The ‘Evangelical’ Heart of Pietist Anthony William Boehm Daniel L. Brunner George Fox University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes Part of the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Brunner, Daniel L., "The ‘Evangelical’ Heart of Pietist Anthony William Boehm" (2016). Faculty Publications - Portland Seminary. 109. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes/109 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Portland Seminary at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications - Portland Seminary by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Heart Religion: Evangelical Piety in England & Ireland, 1690–1850 John Coffey The ‘Evangelical’ Heart of Pietist Anthony William Boehm Daniel L. Brunner DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724155.003.0004 Abstract and Keywords German Lutheran Pietism, as represented by Philipp J. Spener and August H. Francke’s institutions at Halle, is one noteworthy outworking of the ‘spiritual’ revival during the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. The foremost proponent of Halle Pietism in England was Anthony William Boehm (1673–1722), whose literary activity became significant in English religious life. This chapter evaluates the ‘evangelical’ nature of Boehm’s Pietist voice in the ‘tunnel period’ between the Restoration and the Evangelical Revival. Using the lens of David Bebbington’s quadrilateral—conversionism, activism, biblicism, and crucicentrism—the article explore the similarities and dissimilarities between Pietism and evangelicalism at the nexus of Boehm’s publications. -
Liberation and Prosperity Theologies Geoffrey Grogan, Glasgow
LIBERATION AND PROSPERITY THEOLOGIES GEOFFREY GROGAN, GLASGOW Introduction The title of this paper may seem strange. On the face of it, Liberation Theology and Prosperity Theology may seem to have little in common, even to be diametrically opposed to each other. A little thought, however, will enable us to see that the very fact of their stark contrast makes them suitable subjects for joint treatment. It is only where two entities have something in common that we may helpfully contrast them. If I were to be asked to contrast the Forth Bridge and three o'clock I would find the task difficult, if not impossible, for they have so little in common. Experience shows that often opposites have a meeting point. In practice, Fascist and Marxist totalitarianism may be equally unpleasant to live under. The effects of cold and heat on the body have some similarities. Because both subjects are large, and each type of theology has a number of varieties and off-shoots, I propose to limit the scope of the paper. We will concentrate on the central objective features of each of the two theologies. For example, we will say more about Prosperity Theology's concept of God's purpose than its understanding of faith. We will consider first the nature of each type of theology, and then seek their theological and philosophical connections. We will then endeavour to provide a biblical critique, first of all looking at elements the two have in common and then treating each separately. Finally we will indicate our conclusions on the basis of this study. -
Benefitting from Luther's Small Catechism
MAJT 28 (2017): 67-76 BENEFITTING FROM LUTHER’S SMALL CATECHISM … AS A CALVINIST by Daniel R. Hyde1 MARTIN LUTHER (1483–1546) was a hero. His contemporaries depicted him as everything from the angel of Revelation 14, an apostle, Daniel redivivus, Ezekiel’s good shepherd, one of three Mary’s at the tomb of a resurrected Christendom, prophets like Elijah, Enoch, Isaiah, and Jeremiah, and even Hercules Germanicus complete with lion pelt clothing and a club beating medieval theologians to death. 2 When Heinrich Bullinger (1504–1575) rejected the claim that Luther was an apostle, this led many of Luther’s followers to respond with lengthy refutations in sermons and writings that he in fact was an apostle.3 Perhaps this is to be expected of Luther’s fellow “Lutherans” (anachronistically speaking). What is not so expected is how Protestants of the “Reformed” or “Calvinist” kind (again, another anachronism) spoke of him in heroic terms. As early as 1520, Ulrich Zwingli (1484–1531) called Luther a contemporary Elijah.4 As well, after Luther died, the tendency for the Reformed was to focus their criticism on Luther’s so-called followers while leaving “the Big Man” alone. An example of this occurred one year after the Book of Concord was published (1580), when Christopher Grandmundt published a refutation of Lutheran “ubiquitist” theologians such as Jakob Andreae (1528–1590). Grandmundt said Andreae took extreme statements Luther uttered in the heat of controversy in order to buttress the Gnesio (“true”) Lutheran position. In contrast, Grandmundt said Luther merely exhibited his weakness in these utterances; it was his followers who were in serious error. -
The Formula of Concord As a Model for Discourse in the Church
21st Conference of the International Lutheran Council Berlin, Germany August 27 – September 2, 2005 The Formula of Concord as a Model for Discourse in the Church Robert Kolb The appellation „Formula of Concord“ has designated the last of the symbolic or confessional writings of the Lutheran church almost from the time of its composition. This document was indeed a formulation aimed at bringing harmony to strife-ridden churches in the search for a proper expression of the faith that Luther had proclaimed and his colleagues and followers had confessed as a liberating message for both church and society fifty years earlier. This document is a formula, a written document that gives not even the slightest hint that it should be conveyed to human ears instead of human eyes. The Augsburg Confession had been written to be read: to the emperor, to the estates of the German nation, to the waiting crowds outside the hall of the diet in Augsburg. The Apology of the Augsburg Confession, it is quite clear from recent research,1 followed the oral form of judicial argument as Melanchthon presented his case for the Lutheran confession to a mythically yet neutral emperor; the Apology was created at the yet not carefully defined border between oral and written cultures. The Large Catechism reads like the sermons from which it was composed, and the Small Catechism reminds every reader that it was written to be recited and repeated aloud. The Formula of Concord as a „Binding Summary“ of Christian Teaching In contrast, the „Formula of Concord“ is written for readers, a carefully- crafted formulation for the theologians and educated lay people of German Lutheran churches to ponder and study.