3.4 Biological Resources
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ELDORADO–IVANPAH TRANSMISSION PROJECT 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 1 3.4 Biological Resources 2 3 This section describes the environmental setting, regulatory setting, and potential impacts of the construction and 4 operation of the proposed project and alternatives with respect to biological resources. Information in this section is 5 largely based on the Eldorado–Ivanpah Transmission Project Biological Technical Report (EPG 2009) and the 6 Proponent’s Environmental Assessment (PEA) dated May 28, 2009, as prepared by Southern California Edison 7 (SCE, hereafter referred to as the applicant). Details on locations of the EITP facilities, rights-of-way (ROWs), extra 8 workspaces, and staging areas can be found in Chapter 2. Chapter 2 also provides a detailed description of 9 construction, operation, and maintenance techniques used for the proposed project and alternatives to the proposed 10 project. Comments received from the general public and resource agencies during the scoping process are evaluated 11 and addressed as well in Section 3.4.3, ―Impact Analysis.‖ 12 13 3.4.1 Environmental Setting 14 15 The EITP is located within the Eldorado and Ivanpah valleys in southern Clark County, Nevada, and in southeastern 16 California. The project would cross public and privately owned lands (see Section 3.9, ―Land Use, Agricultural 17 Resources, and Special Management Areas‖). Most of the lands that would be crossed by the transmission line in 18 California are administered by the BLM. Small segments would cross private parcels at Nipton, California, and in the 19 vicinity of the Mountain Pass Substation. Similarly, the EITP in Nevada is predominantly situated on BLM lands, but 20 private lands would be crossed near the Eldorado Substation and possibly at Primm, Nevada. 21 22 Environmental analysis for biological resources is confined by the natural geographic boundaries of the region in 23 which the EITP is sited. The region is comprised of alternating valleys and abrupt mountain ranges with gently 24 sloping aprons of sediment debris spread along the slopes. The mountains drain to interior closed basins with playa 25 lakes in the valley bottoms. Specifically, environmental analysis incorporates the drainage footprint of the Eldorado, 26 Ivanpah, Roach, and Jean playa lake beds that are present in the Eldorado, Ivanpah, and Jean valleys (see Figure 27 3.8-2 in Section 3.8, ―Hydrology and Water Quality‖). These playas are typically high in evaporated salts, and plant 28 communities are usually composed of salt-tolerant species. The analysis also incorporates the seven mountain 29 ranges that surround the proposed project area. These ranges are typically rugged and characterized by cliffs, 30 ledges, and formations with small pockets and crevices. Historic abandoned mines are located in some of the 31 mountain ranges (EPG 2009). The Clark Mountains bound the far western edge of the proposed project, while the 32 Spring Mountains are to the north of the existing transmission line just above Primm, Nevada. At the eastern edge of 33 the Ivanpah Valley in Nevada, the transmission line passes between Sheep Mountain to the north and the north end 34 of the Lucy Gray Mountains, then passes through the northern McCullough Mountains. The telecommunication line 35 alternatives pass to the west of the Highland Ranges, and, further south, between the McCullough and New York 36 mountains. 37 38 The entire EITP is within the Mojave Desert biome. A generally accepted elevation range for the Mojave Desert is 39 from -479 feet in Death Valley, California, to 4,500 feet along the northern edge of the biome, and up to 5,500 feet in 40 the mountains. Elevations within the EITP corridor vary from approximately 1,800 feet at the Eldorado Substation to 41 5,305 feet at the Mountain Pass Substation. Annual precipitation for the Mojave Desert typically ranges from 2.5 to 42 7.5 inches, and is predominantly associated with winter rains, which occur from mid-December through early March. 43 44 3.4.1.1 Existing Conditions 45 46 Survey Methodology and Coverage 47 Information on biological resources within the EITP was gathered through field surveys and desktop analyses. Field 48 surveys were conducted by the applicant. As the third-party contractor charged with identifying and assessing project 49 impacts, Ecology and Environment, Inc., independently conducted desktop analyses by reviewing current regional 50 literature and accessing agency internet biological databases and resources, such as the California Natural Diversity APRIL 2010 3.4-1 DRAFT EIR/EIS ELDORADO–IVANPAH TRANSMISSION PROJECT 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 1 Database (CNDDB), the Nevada Natural Heritage Program (NNHP) database, and California Department of Fish and 2 Game (CDFG), Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, National Park Service (NPS), U.S. Fish and Wildlife 3 Service (USFWS), and BLM internet resources. Regional review was defined by the natural geographic boundaries in 4 which the proposed project area is present, as described in Section 3.4.1, above. 5 6 Field surveys were conducted in 2008 and 2009 for most of the project areas and in buffer zones of varying width 7 around existing and proposed project facilities. New access and spur roads as identified by the applicant will be 8 surveyed during spring 2010. Reconnaissance surveys were performed along the entire existing transmission line 9 route from the Eldorado Substation west to the proposed Ivanpah Substation site (proposed transmission line route), 10 and from the proposed Ivanpah Substation site west to the Mountain Pass Substation. The following were also 11 surveyed: 12 13 Transmission Line Alternative Routes A and B near the Eldorado Substation, and Alternatives C and D and 14 Subalternative E near Primm, Nevada; 15 The Nipton 33-kV/Earth 12-kV line from the Mountain Pass Substation south to an existing AT&T microwave 16 site; 17 The proposed fiber optic route along the existing Eldorado–Lugo transmission line from the Eldorado 18 Substation south to Nipton; and 19 The Nipton 33-kV line between Nipton and the point where the Nipton 33-kV line crosses I-15. 20 21 During field surveys, biological resources were assessed within a 250-foot-wide corridor along the transmission lines. 22 The purpose of reconnaissance surveys was to identify vegetation communities and wildlife present, to conduct 23 preliminary searches for sensitive plant and wildlife species in suitable habitats within the project limits (including 24 nests for raptors), and to identify areas that required additional protocol-level surveys for sensitive species. Protocol 25 surveys provide specific location information on sensitive species occurrences within project limits. Focused surveys 26 conducted included USFWS protocol-level presence/absence surveys (including zones of influence) for the Mojave 27 population of desert tortoise and surveys for rare plants and invasive/noxious weed species. 28 29 Protocol-level surveys for desert tortoise were conducted in spring 2008 and 2009 along the proposed transmission 30 line route between the Eldorado Substation and the Mountain Pass Substation, all transmission alternative routes, 31 the proposed telecommunications lines and all alternatives, and the proposed microwave tower site near the town of 32 Nipton. Because of the more limited potential impacts associated with placement of the fiber optic communications 33 line along existing transmission and distribution lines (Eldorado–Lugo 500-kV and Nipton 33-kV, respectively), 34 protocol surveys were not performed for the entire telecommunication route but focused on areas of ground 35 disturbance associated with cable pulling and tensioning sites, tower retrofit construction areas, and other 36 construction areas. Tower pads and spur roads associated with the existing Eldorado–Lugo transmission line (route 37 for the proposed fiber optic line, Path 2, Sections 1 and 2) were surveyed. Access roads along the Eldorado–Lugo 38 line were not surveyed. The USFWS service has agreed that data collected for the 100-foot-buffered tower sites and 39 the spur roads on the Eldorado–Lugo transmission route can be used for estimating desert tortoise densities along 40 these access roads (Burroughs 2009). The applicant plans to complete additional desert tortoise surveys in spring 41 2010. For the proposed transmission line route and alternatives, biologists surveyed a 200-foot ROW, plus five zone- 42 of-influence transects on each side. Results of the 2008 desert tortoise surveys are provided in the Desert Tortoise 43 Survey Report (Karl 2009), an appendix to the Eldorado-Ivanpah Transmission Project Biological Technical Report 44 (EPG 2009). Results of the 2009 desert tortoise surveys are provided in the DRAFT Desert Tortoise Survey Report 45 (Karl 2010), in Appendix B-2 of this document. 46 47 A rare plant and invasive/noxious weed survey was conducted by first developing target species lists after consulting 48 lists of federally and state-listed species and similar species lists maintained by the California Native Plant Society 49 (CNPS), the CNDDB, the NNHP, the Nevada Native Plant Society (NNPS), and the California and Nevada offices of 50 the BLM. Field surveys for rare plants were conducted along the proposed route and in most project areas; however, APRIL 2010 3.4-2 DRAFT EIR/EIS ELDORADO–IVANPAH TRANSMISSION PROJECT 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 1 some areas were not covered, including some alternative routes and existing substation facilities. Additionally, the 2 Ivanpah Dry Lake playa and disturbed ground areas and paved roads and parking lots near Primm, Nevada, were 3 not surveyed. Additional surveys for rare plants will be completed by the applicant in spring 2010. An invasive/ 4 noxious weed survey was performed along the proposed project route from the existing Eldorado Substation to the 5 proposed Ivanpah Substation site, extending west along the fiber optic communications route to the Mountain Pass 6 Substation. 7 8 Survey results for both reconnaissance and protocol-level surveys are provided in the Eldorado–Ivanpah 9 Transmission Project Biological Technical Report (EPG 2009).