Download a Copy of This Report As a PDF from Our Website

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download a Copy of This Report As a PDF from Our Website Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Swift, Hannah J. and Mahmood, Lynsey and Abrams, Dominic (2016) Prejudice and unlawful behaviour: Exploring levers for change. Equality and Human Rights Commission, 213 pp. DOI Link to record in KAR http://kar.kent.ac.uk/61917/ Document Version Publisher pdf Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Equality and Human Rights Commission Research report 101 Prejudice and unlawful behaviour: Exploring levers for change Dominic Abrams, Hannah J. Swift and Lynsey Mahmood Centre for the Study of Group Process, University of Kent © 2016 Equality and Human Rights Commission First published: July 2016 ISBN 978-1-84206-677-5 Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series The Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series publishes research carried out for the Commission by commissioned researchers. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. The Commission is publishing the report as a contribution to discussion and debate. Please contact the Research Team for further information about other Commission research reports, or visit our website. Post: Research Team Equality and Human Rights Commission Arndale House The Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0161 829 8500 Website: www.equalityhumanrights.com You can download a copy of this report as a PDF from our website: www.equalityhumanrights.com If you require this publication in an alternative format, please contact the Communications Team to discuss your needs at: [email protected] Prejudice and unlawful behaviour Contents Tables and figures ...................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... 8 Executive summary .................................................................................................... 9 The nature of prejudiced attitudes and unlawful behaviour ................................... 10 The extent and prevalence of unlawful behaviour ................................................ 17 Preventing and responding to unlawful behaviour ................................................ 17 Suggestions for policy and research ..................................................................... 19 1 | Introduction ......................................................................................................... 21 1.1 Scope of the report ...................................................................................... 21 1.2 Structure of the report ................................................................................. 23 2 | How the research was conducted ....................................................................... 24 2.1 Search strategy ........................................................................................... 24 2.2 Inclusion criteria .......................................................................................... 26 2.3 Assessing the quality of the evaluation of interventions .............................. 26 3| The nature of prejudice ........................................................................................ 28 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 28 3.2 Defining and characterising prejudice ......................................................... 29 3.3 Theory-based implications for intervention .................................................. 39 4 | Disability .............................................................................................................. 45 4.1 Summary ..................................................................................................... 45 4.2 Expressions of prejudiced attitudes ............................................................. 46 4.3 Experiences of discrimination, identity-based harassment and violence .... 51 4.4 Settings ....................................................................................................... 53 4.5 The link between attitudes and behaviours ................................................. 55 Equality and Human Rights Commission · www.equalityhumanrights.com 2 Published: July 2016 Prejudice and unlawful behaviour 4.6 What works? ............................................................................................... 55 4.7 Intersectionalities ........................................................................................ 57 5 | Race .................................................................................................................... 60 5.1 Summary ..................................................................................................... 60 5.2 Expressions of prejudiced attitudes ............................................................. 61 5.3 Experiences of discrimination...................................................................... 63 5.4 Settings ....................................................................................................... 65 5.5 The link between attitudes and behaviours ................................................. 67 5.6 What works? ............................................................................................... 68 5.7 Intersectionalities ........................................................................................ 69 6 | Religion or belief.................................................................................................. 71 6.1 Summary ..................................................................................................... 71 6.2 Expressions of prejudice ............................................................................. 72 6.3 Experiences of discrimination...................................................................... 73 6.4 Settings ....................................................................................................... 77 6.5 The link between attitudes and behaviours ................................................. 78 6.6 What works? ............................................................................................... 79 6.7 Intersectionalities ........................................................................................ 81 7 | Age ...................................................................................................................... 83 7.1 Summary ..................................................................................................... 83 7.2 Expressions of prejudice ............................................................................. 84 7.3 Experiences of discrimination...................................................................... 85 7.4 Settings ....................................................................................................... 86 7.5 The link between attitudes and behaviours ................................................. 88 7.6 What works? ............................................................................................... 88 7.7 Intersectionalities ........................................................................................ 89 8 | Sex ...................................................................................................................... 91 8.1 Summary ..................................................................................................... 91 8.2 Expressions of prejudice ............................................................................. 92 8.3 Experiences of discrimination...................................................................... 94 8.4 Settings ....................................................................................................... 95 Equality and Human Rights Commission · www.equalityhumanrights.com 3 Published: July 2016 Prejudice and unlawful behaviour 8.5 The link between attitudes and behaviours ................................................. 97 8.6 What works? ............................................................................................... 97 8.7 Intersectionalities ........................................................................................ 99 9 | Sexual orientation.............................................................................................. 100 9.1 Summary ................................................................................................... 100 9.2 Expressions of
Recommended publications
  • 37 Association for University Regional Campuses of Ohio AURCO Journal
    37 Association for University Regional Campuses of Ohio Developing Allophilia through Service Learning: A Case Study of Nursing Students at a University’s Regional Campus Karen M. Brown Miami Middletown Allophilia, the love for others who differ from oneself, developed among students who took service-learning courses working with elders with dementia and/or physical limitations. At the beginning of the course, students expressed negative emotions including apprehension, fear, and dread. While working with the elders, students exhibited all of the components of the allophilia framework: affection, engagement, kinship, comfort, enthusiasm, and creativity. By the end of the course, students communicated positive emotions such as empathy, meaningful, and “life- changing.” Moreover, students’ self-evaluations showed high levels of learning as a result of the service-learning approach used. This article discusses the course approach, planning, and design. Additionally, the author conveys the evidence of allophilia and its impact on students and their learning. Finally, the article explores potential future research and implications for professional practice in diverse career paths. Foundationally, caring for all persons is an imperative in many professions, including nursing (Watson, 2009). However, many college students feel intolerance toward others due to such factors as differing race, ethnicity, gender, religion, and age (Alvosed, Long, & Voller, 2009). As a result, educators must incorporate professional values such as caring and compassion into the teaching-learning experience to engender and develop these ideals (Cook & Cullen, 2003). The end result may erase prejudice and stigma while producing professionals who exhibit a genuine love for others: allophilia. Allophilia literally translates to “love of other” (Pittinsky, 2009; Pittinsky, Bacon, & Gary, 2007; Pittinsky, Rosenthal, & Montoya, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Linda R. Tropp
    Linda R. Tropp Curriculum Vitae October 2013 Department of Psychology e-mail: [email protected] Tobin Hall, 135 Hicks Way office: Tobin Hall, room 637 University of Massachusetts, Amherst phone: (413) 577-0934 Amherst, MA 01003 fax: (413) 545-0996 EDUCATION 1996 – 2000 Ph.D. Social Psychology University of California, Santa Cruz 1994 – 1996 M.Sc. Social Psychology University of California, Santa Cruz 1988 – 1992 B.A. Psychology and Spanish Wellesley College Wellesley College Latin Honors: Magna Cum Laude; Phi Beta Kappa; Sigma Xi; Departmental Honors in Psychology; Spanish National Honor Society 1991 History and Language Studies Universidad de Córdoba, Spain ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2012 – present Professor of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Amherst 2006 – 2012 Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Amherst 2000 – 2006 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Boston College 1999 Instructor – Social Psychology, San Jose State University 1999 Instructor – Research Methods, California State University, Monterey Bay 1998 Instructor – Intergroup Relations, University of California, Santa Cruz 1994 – 1997 Teaching Assistant, University of California, Santa Cruz OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2013 – present. Research Advisor, Equal Justice Society, a national legal organization focused on restoring constitutional safeguards against discrimination, using a three-pronged approach combining legal advocacy, outreach and coalition building, and education through effective messaging and communication strategies 2011 – present
    [Show full text]
  • Microaggressions: Clarification, Evidence, and Impact
    PPSXXX10.1177/1745691619827499WilliamsMicroaggressions 827499research-article2019 ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Perspectives on Psychological Science 2020, Vol. 15(1) 3 –26 Microaggressions: Clarification, © The Author(s) 2019 Article reuse guidelines: Evidence, and Impact sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619827499 10.1177/1745691619827499 www.psychologicalscience.org/PPS Monnica T. Williams School of Psychology, University of Ottawa Abstract In a 2017 article in Perspectives on Psychological Science, Scott Lilienfeld critiqued the conceptual basis for microaggressions as well as the scientific rigor of scholarship on the topic. The current article provides a response that systematically analyzes the arguments and representations made in Lilienfeld’s critique with regard to the concept of microaggressions and the state of the related research. I show that, in contrast to the claim that the concept of microaggressions is vague and inconsistent, the term is well defined and can be decisively linked to individual prejudice in offenders and mental-health outcomes in targets. I explain how the concept of microaggressions is connected to pathological stereotypes, power structures, structural racism, and multiple forms of racial prejudice. Also described are recent research advances that address some of Lilienfeld’s original critiques. Further, this article highlights potentially problematic attitudes, assumptions, and approaches embedded in Lilienfeld’s analysis that are common to the field of psychology as a whole. It is important for all academics to acknowledge and question their own biases and perspectives when conducting scientific research. Keywords microaggressions, racism, validity, ethnic differences, diversity, education Although it is no longer socially acceptable to be openly defined microaggressions as “black-white racial interac- racist in America (e.g., Nadal, 2018), racism continues tions [that] are characterized by white put-downs, done to be part of the fabric of American life.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reports 2016 - 2018
    CONGRESSO XVII - CHILE NATIONAL REPORTS 2016 - 2018 EDITED BY JAMES DOUET TICCIH National Reports 2016-2018 National Reports on Industrial Heritage Presented on the Occasion of the XVII International TICCIH Congress Santiago de Chile, Chile Industrial Heritage: Understanding the Past, Making the Future Sustainable 13 and 14 September 2018 Edited by James Douet THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE CONSERVATION OF INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE TICCIH Congress 2018 National Reports The International Committee for the Conservation of the Indus- trial Heritage is the world organization for industrial heritage. Its goals are to promote international cooperation in preserving, conserving, investigating, documenting, researching, interpreting, and advancing education of the industrial heritage. Editor: James Douet, TICCIH Bulletin editor: [email protected] TICCIH President: Professor Patrick Martin, Professor of Archae- ology Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA: [email protected] Secretary: Stephen Hughes: [email protected] Congress Director: Jaime Migone Rettig [email protected] http://ticcih.org/ Design and layout: Daniel Schneider, Distributed free to members and congress participants September 2018 Opinions expressed are the authors’ and do not necessarily re- flect those of TICCIH. Photographs are by the authors unless stated otherwise. The copyright of all pictures and drawings in this book belongs to the authors. No part of this publication may be reproduced for any other purposes without authorization or permission
    [Show full text]
  • Predictors of Racial Prejudice : a Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Religion and Political Orientation
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Dissertations and Theses @ UNI Student Work 2015 Predictors of racial prejudice : a meta-analysis of the influence of religion and political orientation Kristin Ann Broussard University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2015 Kristin Ann Broussard Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Broussard, Kristin Ann, "Predictors of racial prejudice : a meta-analysis of the influence of eligionr and political orientation" (2015). Dissertations and Theses @ UNI. 162. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/162 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses @ UNI by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright by KRISTIN ANN BROUSSARD 2015 All Rights Reserved PREDICTORS OF RACIAL PREJUDICE: A META-ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF RELIGION AND POLITICAL ORIENTATION An Abstract of a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Kristin Ann Broussard University of Northern Iowa July 2015 ABSTRACT The effects of religion and political orientation on racial prejudice are frequently studied yet, to date, no research has compared these effects using meta-analysis. One theory of prejudice that may help to predict outcomes is sociocultural theory (Ashmore & Del Boca, 1981), which posits that social identities provide norms and values that promote cultural stereotypes. Strong social identities such as religion or political orientation may differentially promote outgroup stereotyping and prejudice.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Scientists As Champions of Diversity to Transform the Geosciences
    Journal of Geoscience Education ISSN: 1089-9995 (Print) 2158-1428 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujge20 Developing scientists as champions of diversity to transform the geosciences Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Eric Kaufman, Oriana Calagna, LaToya Myles, Carolyn Brinkworth, Denise R. Simmons & P. Grady Dixon To cite this article: Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Eric Kaufman, Oriana Calagna, LaToya Myles, Carolyn Brinkworth, Denise R. Simmons & P. Grady Dixon (2019): Developing scientists as champions of diversity to transform the geosciences, Journal of Geoscience Education, DOI: 10.1080/10899995.2019.1618692 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1618692 View supplementary material Published online: 13 Jun 2019. Submit your article to this journal View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ujge20 Running Head: DEVELOPING SCIENTISTS AS CHAMPIONS OF DIVERSITY 1 Title: Developing Scientists as Champions of Diversity to Transform the Geosciences 2 3 Authors: 4 Kathleen Quardokus Fisher1, Eric Kaufman2, Oriana Calagna3, LaToya Myles4, Carolyn 5 Brinkworth5, Denise R. Simmons6, and P. Grady Dixon7 6 1. Corresponding Author, Department of Earth and Environment and STEM Transformation 7 Institute, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, AHC5-395, Miami FL, 8 33199. [email protected] 9 2. Department of Agricultural, Leadership, and Community Education, Virginia Tech 10 3. Department of Earth and Environment and STEM Transformation Institute, Florida 11 International University 12 4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Air Resources Laboratory, 13 Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division 14 5. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR), Office of UCAR President 15 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Care Count in Scotland
    MAKING CARE COUNT IN SCOTLAND INVESTING FOR A JUST, CARING AND GREEN RECOVERY JULY 2020 “Some may get back to whatever normal looks like – for others though, the shadow of Covid- 19 will be hanging over our heads for a long time. That may be through continued isolation or it may be through deeper poverty or poorer physical and mental health.” Lynn Williams, unpaid carer1 This briefing explores the link between the under-valuing of care work in Scotland and a growing gendered poverty crisis. It is part of a series of papers written to inform public debate in Scotland, Britain and Globally. It outlines how women provide most paid and unpaid care in Scotland and examines the context for those with different types of caring responsibilities. The paper amplifies the voices of people providing care, while reviewing the evidence and priorities of those working to support them. It details emerging evidence on the impact of the coronavirus crisis and makes a series of recommendations for the Scottish Parliament to better value and invest in care. Protecting people providing care from poverty, and valuing their contribution, must be at the heart of a Just, Caring and Green Recovery in Scotland. 1 KEY MESSAGES ● We have one simple ask of governments across Britain: act now to end poverty for carers, paid and unpaid, by investing in care, and creating the care jobs that will power a Just, Caring and Green Recovery. ● Care, Covid and women: The coronavirus crisis has placed yet more pressure onto households and women who were already at breaking point after years in which the costs and responsibility for care have shifted from government and business to households – especially those in poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Black Male Beast in Postclassical American Cinema: ‘Forging’ Stereoytpes and Discovering Black Masculinities
    THE MYTH OF THE BLACK MALE BEAST IN POSTCLASSICAL AMERICAN CINEMA: ‘FORGING’ STEREOYTPES AND DISCOVERING BLACK MASCULINITIES BY MARTIN LUTHER PATRICK A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of M.Phil Department of American and Canadian Studies The University of Birmingham September 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Full name (surname first): Patrick, Martin Luther School/Department: Historical Studies/American and Canadian Studies Full title of thesis/dissertation: The myth of the Black male beast in postclassical American Cinema: ‘Forging’ stereotypes and discovering Black masculinities Degree: M.Phil. Date of submission: September 2009 Date of award of degree : December 2009 Abstract : The thesis examines how postclassical American film invent s Black male characters. It uses Levi-St rauss and B arthes’ methods of analyzing myth and critiques heg emonic authorship throug h Jung ’s work on archetypes in the collective unconscious and the ‘shadow’. Using Othello as a prototype character, I examine how he became an archetype that manifests two perceptions of B lack characters in the collective unconscious.
    [Show full text]
  • House File 784 Information Packet House of Representatives
    Representative John Thompson (DFL) District 67A House File 784 Information Packet House of Representatives Government Finance and Election Committee Chairman Michael Nelson 1 Table of Contents Representative Thompson Committee Statement ............................................................... 3 The world and nation await Minnesota’s response to systemic racism and injustice. ........ 4 Minnesota A Leader in Human Relations Policies.............................................................. 4 House File 784 does two things ........................................................................................... 6 The appropriation will be allocated in the following manner: ............................................ 6 House Research Information Related to HF784 .................................................................. 8 State of Minnesota and Others Research Reports Related to HF784 ................................ 13 MN ranked second-worst state in the U.S. for Blacks to live ........................................... 13 2 Representative Thompson Committee Statement Chairman Nelson and Members of the Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to present House File 784. The companion bill is Senate File 800. House File 784 does two things: 1. The bill targets state appropriations ($357M) in the African American and African Immigrant community to stabilize and expand their capacity to address socioeconomic disparities created by the poor administrative application and enforcement of Minnesota’s primary equal opportunity
    [Show full text]
  • Trustees' Report & Accounts April 2015–March 2016
    Trustees’ Report and Accounts april 2015 – march 20 16 Front Page Image: Brain scan illustrating the work of Neuroscientist and RSE Fellow Professor Richard Morris CBE. Image © Dr Mark Bastin ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH Trustees’ Report & Accounts 2015 –2016 Contents Council of the RSE 2015 –16 2 Trustees’ Annual Report Highlights of the year 3 Activity report 4 Financial review 14 Structure, governance and management 15 Policies 17 Future plans 18 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Council of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 20 Accounts Group statement of financial activities 22 (incorporating the income and expenditure account) Group balance sheet 23 RSE balance sheet 24 RSE statement of financial activities 25 (incorporating the income and expenditure account) Group cash flow statement 26 Notes to the financial statements 27 Legal and Administrative Information 52 1 ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH Trustees’ Report & Accounts 2015 –2016 The Royal Society of Edinburgh is registered in Scotland as Scottish Charity No. SC000470 The Trustees are the Council Members elected during the financial year (1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016) Council President Dame Jocelyn BELL BURNELL DBE Vice-Presidents Professor T S DURRANI OBE Professor N E HAITES OBE Mr I C RITCHIE CBE Sir David WALLACE CBE Professor J W WALLACE CBE General Secretary Professor A ALEXANDER OBE* Treasurer Mr G R WILSON CB* Fellowship Secretary Professor J M C CONNELL Councillors Professor D A CANTRELL CBE Professor R J CORMACK Professor B E CRAWFORD OBE Sir Muir RUSSELL KCB Professor Dame Joan
    [Show full text]
  • Are Allies Who We Think They Are?: a Comparative Analysis
    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Faculty Publications Psychology Department 2018 Are Allies Who We Think They Are?: A Comparative Analysis Joan Ostrove Macalester College Kendrick Brown Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/psycfacpub Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Ostrove, Joan and Brown, Kendrick, "Are Allies Who We Think They Are?: A Comparative Analysis" (2018). Faculty Publications. 4. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/psycfacpub/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychology Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Received: 6 March 2017 | Revised: 28 December 2017 | Accepted: 15 January 2018 DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12502 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Are allies who we think they are?: A comparative analysis Joan M. Ostrove1 | Kendrick T. Brown2 1Macalester College Abstract 2University of Redlands Although dominant group allies have been increasingly studied by social psychologists interested in Correspondence positive intergroup relations and the promotion of social justice, most of the existing research Joan M. Ostrove, Psychology Department, focuses on self-identified allies or dominant group individuals who are engaging in social justice Macalester College, Saint Paul, MN 55105. activities. Little comparative work has examined white allies who were specifically identified as such Email: [email protected] by people of color. Two studies assessed qualities associated with affirming attitudes (low prejudice, high internal motivation to respond without prejudice, allophilia, and awareness of privilege) and informed action (activism) expected to be distinctively characteristic of allies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Mid Year Population Estimates
    2016 Mid-year Population Estimates Aberdeen City May 2017 RESEARCH AND INFORMATION RESEARCH AND INFORMATION Briefing Paper (May 2017) 2016 Mid-year Population Estimates: Aberdeen City This briefing paper describes the 2016 mid-year population estimates (MYEs) for Aberdeen City. MYEs are population estimates produced annually by National Records of Scotland (NRS) for Scotland and its administrative areas. The 2016 MYEs were published by NRS on 27 April 2017 and give an estimate of the population on 30th June 2016. The 2016 MYEs build on previous estimates, which are updated to account for population change (births, deaths, migration and other change) during the period between 1st July 2015 and 30th June 2016. This paper gives an overview of the population of Aberdeen City at 30th June 2016, including its age and sex structure. It also looks at time series data to give an overview of population trends and changes over time. A brief summary of population projections is also included. Comparisons with other local authorities and Scotland are presented where appropriate. Population estimates can be used for a variety of purposes including resource allocation and planning of services. For more information on this paper, please contact: Research and Information Team Office of Chief Executive Aberdeen City Council Old Town House, Broad Street 1st Floor, Room 1-3 Aberdeen, AB10 1FY 03000 200 291 [email protected] Previous briefing papers have included the following topics: Household projections (2014 based) Population projections (2014 based) Life expectancy and healthy life expectancy in Aberdeen City It is intended that these papers will be used by Council services and, where appropriate, our Community Planning partners to assist policy development and wider service delivery.
    [Show full text]