D5.6 RMI Implementation Status Quo and Needs in EU-28

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

D5.6 RMI Implementation Status Quo and Needs in EU-28 Deliverable D5.6 Report on RMI implementation status quo and needs in EU-28 Project: Mineral Intelligence Capacity Analysis Acronym: MICA Grant Agreement: 689468 Funding Scheme: Horizon 2020 Webpage: www.mica-project.eu Work Package: Work Package 5 Work Package Leader: Blažena Hamadová Deliverable Title: Report on RMI implementation status quo and needs in EU-28 Deliverable Number: D5.6 Deliverable Leader: MinPol Involved beneficiaries: Dissemination level: PU Public Version: Final Status: Submitted Year: 2018 Blažena Hamadová, Angelika Brechelmacher, Diego Murguía, Gün- Authors: ter Tiess, Utkarsh Akhouri, Saurabh Thakur Reviewed by: Approved by: Erika (Machacek) Faigen, Kisser Thorsøe This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and inno- vation programme under Grant Agreement No. 689648. 1 Deliverable D5.6 Notice The contents of this document are the copyright of the MICA consortium and shall not be copied in whole, in part, or otherwise reproduced (whether by photographic, reprographic or any other method), and the contents thereof shall not be divulged to any other person or organisation with- out prior written permission. Such consent is hereby automatically given to all members who have entered into the MICA Consortium Agreement, dated 19th October 2015, and to the European Commission to use and disseminate this information. This information and content of this report is the sole responsibility of the MICA consortium members and does not necessarily represent the views expressed by the European Commission or its services. Whilst the information contained in the documents and webpages of the project is believed to be accurate, the author(s) or any other participant in the MICA consortium makes no warranty of any kind with regard to this material. 2 Deliverable D5.6 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... 3 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................ 5 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................ 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 8 DELIVERABLE REPORT .................................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 12 1.1 Framing the Issue .......................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 12 2 Country reports of EU-28 Member States ...................................................................................... 17 2.1 Austria ............................................................................................................................................. 17 2.2 Belgium ............................................................................................................................................ 19 2.3 Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................................ 19 2.4 Croatia ............................................................................................................................................ 21 2.5 Cyprus ............................................................................................................................................. 24 2.6 Czech Republic .............................................................................................................................. 24 2.7 Denmark ......................................................................................................................................... 26 2.8 Estonia ............................................................................................................................................. 28 2.9 Finland ............................................................................................................................................. 31 2.10 France .............................................................................................................................................. 33 2.11 Germany ......................................................................................................................................... 35 2.12 Greece ............................................................................................................................................. 36 2.13 Hungary ........................................................................................................................................... 39 2.14 Ireland .............................................................................................................................................. 39 2.15 Italy ................................................................................................................................................... 41 2.16 Latvia ................................................................................................................................................ 43 2.17 Lithuania .......................................................................................................................................... 44 2.18 Luxembourg ................................................................................................................................... 48 2.19 Malta ................................................................................................................................................ 48 2.20 Netherlands .................................................................................................................................... 51 2.21 Poland .............................................................................................................................................. 53 2.22 Portugal ........................................................................................................................................... 55 2.23 Romania .......................................................................................................................................... 56 3 Deliverable D5.6 2.24 Slovakia ............................................................................................................................................ 58 2.25 Slovenia ........................................................................................................................................... 59 2.26 Spain ................................................................................................................................................. 63 2.27 Sweden ............................................................................................................................................ 65 2.28 United Kingdom ............................................................................................................................ 66 3 RMI-MATRIX status of EU-28 ............................................................................................................ 70 4 Analysis of the RMI-MATRIX status (EU-28) .................................................................................. 77 4.1 Wider context ............................................................................................................................... 77 4.2 MFA vs MCA approach ............................................................................................................... 78 4.3 Back cast/Forecast/foresight of mining policies ...................................................................... 82 4.4 MIA/MDoPI/LUP ........................................................................................................................... 82 4.5 Circular Economy ......................................................................................................................... 84 4.6 Mining vs. mineral policies .......................................................................................................... 85 5 Conclusions and recommendations ................................................................................................... 87 6 References ............................................................................................................................................... 88 4 Deliverable D5.6 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BMWFW Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy CEC Circular Economy concept COMES Committee on Strategic Metals (in French Comité pour les métaux stratégiques) CRIRSCO Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards for Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. DMC Domestic Material Consumption DGD Digital geological database DGEG The Directorate-General of Energy and Geology (in Portuguese Direção-Geral de En- ergia e Geologia) DG JRC Directorate-General Joint Research Centre (European Commission) EIA Environmental impact assessment EMD Exploration and Mining Division of the Department of Communications, Climate Ac- tion
Recommended publications
  • EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROCESSES Where Is Croatia?
    157 Dragomir Vojnić* UDK 338.22 (497.5):339.923 Izvorni znanstveni rad EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROCESSES Where is Croatia? Paper prepared for the International conference on “Russia and the CIS in recent European integration processes” Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of International Economic and Political Studies Moscow, October 17-18, 2002 The fact that by admission of Slovenia the borders of the European Union almost reached Zagreb, repeatedly provoked a discussion about the reasons of lagging behind of Croatia. The author observes the basic reasons (beside the imposed war) in political atmosphere which was unacceptable for international community. Such atmosphere resulted in big mistakes of the entire (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and economic policy (tycoon privatization and the wrong stabilization level). Unacceptable political atmosphere is also shown by the fact that Croatian and Slovenian economists commonly prepared the starting bases of transition. Slovenia consistently implemented this concept, while Croatia completely ignored it. The second wave of democratization (at the beginning of century) created political atmosphere more acceptable for international community and more adequate for economic development. Beside certain progress in economic sphere especially expressed are shifts in direction of somewhat faster integration into the European Union. In this sense the author was also encouraged by the President of the European Commission Romano Prodi at the XIII th World Congress of economists in Lisbon, September 9 to 13, 2002. * D. Vojnić, prof. dr. sc., znanstveni savjetnik Ekonomskog instituta, Zagreb (u mirovini) D. VOJNI∆: European Integration Processes 158 EKONOMSKI PREGLED, 54 (1-2) 157-172 (2003) Some general causes of lagging behind of Croatia Comparing achievements of European countries in transition (within environment of globalization trends and integration processes and looking for position of Croatia) one question has been repeatedly imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Croatia in 2011
    2011 Minerals Yearbook CROATIA U.S. Department of the Interior September 2013 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF CROATIA By Harold R. Newman Petroleum extraction and refining were the major economic tone of the Mining Act, which is designed to give control over activities of Croatia’s mineral industry. Mineral resources mineral reserves back to the state (International Law Office, included bauxite, clays, coal, gypsum, mica, natural asphalt, 2011). petroleum, and salt. The country remained reliant on mineral commodity imports for its industrial needs. Most of the output Minerals in the National Economy of industrial minerals was consumed by the domestic market. In 2011, mineral resources and mineral production were not The Government was continuing with the process for entering significant to Croatia’s national economy. Croatia had a trade the European Union (EU) in 2013. deficit in mining and quarrying goods (a category that included The Energy and Mining Directorate (EMD) is the mineral fuels) in 2011; exports were valued at about 851 million Government agency responsible for governmental activities kuna (HRK) ($143 million1), and imports were valued at related to the energy and mining sectors. The Directorate’s HRK15.5 billion ($2.6 billion). Exports of petroleum and natural responsibilities include drafting laws and regulations related gas were valued at HRK618 million ($104 million), and imports to the energy and mining sectors and planning, proposing, of natural gas and petroleum were valued at HRK14.3 billion developing, and implementing energy and mining policies, ($2.4 billion) (Croatian Bureau of Statistics, 2011). including the Government’s energy development strategy Croatia’s main trading partner was the EU, and the main (Energy and Mining Directorate, 2011a).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Croatia in 2010
    2010 Minerals Yearbook CROATIA U.S. Department of the Interior October 2012 U.S. Geological Survey 2010 Minerals Yearbook CROATIA U.S. Department of the Interior October 2012 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF CROATIA By Mark Brininstool Croatia produced a limited number of mineral commodities, produced in Croatia for which output was reported to have none of which were produced in a quantity that was significant increased. Production of lime decreased by 47% compared with on a world scale. In 2010, Croatia’s gross domestic product that of 2009; sulfur production, by 32%; crushed and brown (GDP) decreased by 1.2% compared with the GDP in 2009. In stone, by 25%; gypsum and anhydrite, by 21%; and silica sand, 2009 (the latest year for which data were available), Croatia by 13%. Production of carbon black was temporarily halted imported about $2.3 billion1 worth of mining and quarrying by Petrokemija d.d. owing to a lack of consumer demand products and exported only about $334 million. Imports of (Petrokemija d.d., 2011, p. 10). crude oil and natural gas accounted for about $2.1 billion of the imports. Crude oil made up about 8.3% of the value of Structure of the Mineral Industry all Croatian imports and was the most important imported product in terms of value; natural gas made up about 2.1% of Table 2 is a list of the major mineral industry facilities in all Croatian imports and was the third most valuable imported Croatia. product. For the foreseeable future, Croatia will most likely remain a modest producer of mineral commodities and continue References Cited to be heavily dependent on imports of mineral fuels (Croatian Bureau of Statistics, 2010, p.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Rijeka Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Department of English Translation from Croatian Into English Tran
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the University of Rijeka UNIVERSITY OF RIJEKA FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH Filip Brdar TRANSLATION FROM CROATIAN INTO ENGLISH TRANSLATION AND ANALYSIS OF TEXTS OF DIFFERENT GENRES Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the B.A. in English Language and Literature and German Language and Literature at the University of Rijeka Supervisor: Nikola Tutek M.A. September 2015 ABSTRACT This B.A. thesis, of the undergraduate study of the English Language and Literature, is focused on the field of translation. The aim of this thesis and accompanying research is to choose three serious, relevant, scientific and academic articles in Croatian, translate and analyse them in English. The thesis is structured in the following way: after a brief introduction there is an article, i.e. a source text in Croatian, followed by the translation and an analysis of the translation. The purpose of the analyses is to explain the process of translating and to reveal different types of problems and challenges which were encountered. After the third translation analysis there is a conclusion, where the entire thesis is summed up and assessed. A bibliography, i.e. the sources, is included at the very end of the B.A. thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SOURCE TEXT 1…………………………………………………………………2 1.1. TRANSLATION OF SOURCE TEXT 1…………………………………...................8 1.2. TRANSLATION ANALYSIS ……………………………………………………….14 2. SOURCE TEXT 2………………………………………………………………...16 2.1. TRANSLATION OF SOURCE TEXT 2……………………………………………..22 2.2 TRANSLATION ANALYSIS…………………………………………………………28 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Opvscvla 29.Indb 3 21.8.2006 11:56:38 FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET SVEUČILIŠTA U ZAGREBU FACULTY of PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY of ZAGREB
    OPVSCVLA ARCHÆOLOGICA 2005 OPVSC. ARCHÆOL. VOL. 29 STR. / PAGES 1–374 ZAGREB 2005. III Opvscvla 29.indb 3 21.8.2006 11:56:38 FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET SVEUČILIŠTA U ZAGREBU FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB RADOVI ARHEOLOŠKOG ZAVODA PAPERS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY UDK 902-904 ISSN 0473-0992 IV Opvscvla 29.indb 4 21.8.2006 11:56:39 SADRŽAJ CONTENTS Stašo FORENBAHER & Timothy KAISER PALAGRUŽA I ŠIRENJE ZEMLJORADNJE NA JADRANU PALAGRUŽA AND THE SPREAD OF FARMING IN THE ADRIATIC Izvorni znanstveni članak / Original scientific paper _________________________ 7 Jacqueline BALEN KOSTOLAČKI HORIZONT NA VUČEDOLU THE KOSTOLAC HORIZON AT VUČEDOL Izvorni znanstveni članak / Original scientific paper ________________________ 25 Domagoj PERKIĆ & Daria LOŽNJAK DIZDAR KASNOBRONČANODOBNA OSTAVA SIČA/LUČICA THE SIČA/LUČICA LATE BRONZE AGE HOARD Izvorni znanstveni članak / Original scientific paper ________________________ 41 Tomislav BILIĆ PLOVIDBA PO GEOGRAFSKOJ ŠIRINI NA MEDITERANU LATITUDE SAILING ON THE MEDITERRANEAN Izvorni znanstveni članak / Original scientific paper _______________________121 Marija MARIĆ JOŠ JEDAN PRILOG LOCIRANJU ANTIČKOGA KULTNOG MJESTA U SELU PRILUKA KRAJ LIVNA I POKUŠAJ REKONSTRUKCIJE SPOMENIKA ANOTHER CONTRIBUTION TO THE LOCATION OF AN ANCIENT CULTIC SITE IN THE VILLAGE OF PRILUKA NEAR LIVNO AND ATTEMPTS TO RECONSTRUCT THE MONUMENT Izvorni znanstveni članak / Original scientific paper _______________________159 Marko SINOBAD STAROSNA DOB ŽENA U VRIJEME UDAJE: PRIMJER ANTIČKE SALONE AGES OF WOMEN AT THE TIME OF MARRIAGE: THE EXAMPLE OF ANCIENT SALONA Izvorni znanstveni članak / Original scientific paper _______________________173 Kristina GLICKSMAN INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL TRADE IN THE ROMAN PROVINCE OF DALMATIA Izvorni znanstveni članak / Original scientific paper _______________________189 Marija ŠIŠA-VIVEK, Tino LELEKOVIĆ & Hrvoje KALAFATIĆ OSTAVA RIMSKOG NOVCA I SREBRNOG POSUĐA IZ PETRIJANCA HOARD OF ROMAN COINS AND SILVER DISHWARE FROM PETRIJANEC Izvorni znanstveni članak / Original scientific paper _______________________231 OPVSC.
    [Show full text]
  • ZAGORAA Cultural/Historical Guide to the Zagora (Inland) Region of Split
    A cultural/historical guide to the Zagora (inland) region of Split-Dalmatia County ZAGORA THE DALMATIAN ZAGORA (INLAND) Joško Belamarić THE DALMATIAN ZAGORA (INLAND) A cultural/historical guide to the Zagora (inland) region of Split-Dalmatia County 4 Zagora 14 Klis Zagora 24 Cetinska krajina 58 Biokovo, Imotski, Vrgorac 3 Zagora THE DALMATIAN ZAGORA (INLAND) A cultural/historical guide to the Zagora (inland) region of Split-Dalmatia County Here, from Klis onwards, on the ridge of the Dinara mountain chain, the angst of inland Dalmatia’s course wastelands has for centuries been sundered from the broad seas that lead to a wider world. The experience of saying one’s goodbyes to the thin line of Dalmatia that has strung itself under the mountain’s crest, that viewed from the sea looks like Atlas’ brothers, is repeated, not without poetic chills, by dozens of travel writers. To define the cultural denominators of Zagora, the Dalmatian inland, is today a difficult task, as the anthropological fabric of the wider Dalmatian hinterland is still too often perceived through the utopian aspect of the Renaissance ideal, the cynicism of the Enlightenment, or the exaggeration of Romanticism and the 18th century national revival. After the fall of medieval feudalism, life here has started from scratch so many times - later observers have the impression that the local customs draw their roots from some untroubled prehistoric source in which the silence of the karst on the plateau towards Promina, behind Biokovo, the gurgling of the living waters of the Zrmanja, Krka, Čikola and Cetina Ri- vers, the quivering of grain on Petrovo, Hrvatac and Vrgorac Fields, on 4 Zagora the fat lands along Strmica and Sinj, create the ide- al framework for the pleasant countenance, joyous heart and sincere morality of the local population of which many have written, each from their own point of view: from abbot Fortis and Ivan Lovrić during the Baroque period, Dinko Šimunović and Ivan Raos not so long ago to Ivan Aralica and, in his own way, Miljenko Jergović today.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical & Allied Products in Croatia
    CHEMICAL & ALLIED PRODUCTS IN CROATIA Report prepared for the Embassy of India in Zagreb by Rahela Jurković, PhD Zagreb, September 2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ........................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ................................................................................. 4 2. Basic information and data regarding the sector ............................. 10 3. Main national strategies concerning the sector ................................ 15 3.1. Industrial Strategy od the Republic of Croatia ........................... 15 3.2. Smart Specialisation Strategy ................................................. 17 4. Associations and research institutions supporting the sector ............. 20 5. Business opportunities for Indian companies .................................. 24 6. List of useful contacts .................................................................. 37 Literature....................................................................................... 38 2 Executive summary The sector of chemical and allied products has a long tradition in Croatia, started at the turn of 19th and 20th centuries. Two Nobel laureates in chemistry were of Croatian origin: Lavoslav Ružička (1887 – 1976) and Vladimir Prelog (1906 – 1998). The chemical and allied products’ Croatian industry today is concentrated around larger towns, especially Zagreb, the capital city. Besides long history and tradition, the sector is characterised by highly skilled workforce, high-quality
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ECONOMIC, SOCIAL and ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE contents IntrodUction INA Group at a glance 2 INA in the community 2 Key financial and operating data 4 Letter from the President of the Management Board 6 Overview of the environment 8 OUR BUsinesses Exploration and Production 12 Refining and marketing 22 Retail 29 FINANCIAL AND OPERATING PERFORMANCE Management discussion and analysis 34 Key Group operating data 50 SUstainaBiltY Sustainability in numbers 54 Letter from Tvrtko Perković, Corporate Centre Business 60 Function Executive Director Introduction and overview 63 Memberships, external initiatives and public policies 64 Report Parameters and Materiality 65 SD & HSE PERFORMANCE IN 2014 68 IMPRESSUM CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INA - Industrija nafte d.d., Avenija V. Holjevca 10, Corporate governance 116 p.p. 555, 10002 Zagreb Management Board 118 Executive Directors 120 PUBLISHED BY: Corporate and shareholders information 122 INA - Industrija nafte d.d., Quality management 123 IR Department, SD & HSE Expected development 127 Sector FOR THE PUBLISHER: Ivan Kolar, Angelika Brnada EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: Martina FINANCIAL STATEMENS AND Bandula, Ivanka Lebinec AUDITOR’S REPORT FOR 2014 Merzel PHOTOGRAPHY: Ferdo INA-Industrija nafte, d.d. - Independent auditors report 143 Buva, Ina's archive Consolidated and unconsolidated financial statements for year 2014 146 DESIGN AND LAYOUT: Stela Notes to the financial statements 160 Blažok, Zrinka Belošić 03 INA awards INA Group at A glance NA is a medium-sized European oil and gas company. With 12,503 oil products on the domestic and international markets. INA operates employees and Group EBITDA of HRK 2,580 million INA has a leading Croatia’s two refineries located in Rijeka and Sisak.
    [Show full text]
  • Uatuc-Info-No-8.Pdf
    uatucUnion of Autonomous Trade Unions of Croatia infoN o . 8 N o v / D e c 2 0 0 9 ISSN 1847-2079 Dear readers, In this ISSUE After eighteen months of hard negotiations and consultations the new Labour Code was finally adopted and came into force with the first day of the new year. Despite some improvements, the results are very lim- ited as the Government decided to content with the minimum, even failing to accept well-argued trade union proposals aimed to minimise possibilities of misuse of certain provisions of the law. 2 New Labour Code - only minimal After the turmoil in the Government, and the resignation of the Vice EU standards for Croatian workers Prime Minister and Minister of Economy Labour and Entrepreneurship Mr Damir PolanËec, former Chief Director of the Croatian Employers’ Association Mr –uro PopijaË was appointed new Minister of Economy, Labour and Entrepreneurship on 19 November. Trade unions did not welcome PopijaË’s appointment, taking the position that portfolio which beside economy also includes labour issues should be given to the person acceptable for both social partners. UATUC renewed its 4 Social Democrat Ivo JosipoviÊ old initiative to dissociate the labour portfolio from economy and form elected new President of Croatia a separate Ministry of Labour, however without success. The opposition Social Democrat Mr Ivo JosipoviÊ has won presiden- tial elections in Croatia by a wide margin, basing his campaign on the programme called “New Justice” and uncompromising fight against corruption, stressing his belief that “citizens of Croatia want to live in a country in which work is rewarded and criminal punished, in the country of social security and equal chances”.
    [Show full text]
  • Export Competitiveness of the Croatian Food Industry
    ARGUMENTA OECONOMICA No 2 (41) 2018 PL ISSN 1233-5835 ∗ Goran Buturac*, Željko Lovrinčević*, Davor Mikulić* EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS OF THE CROATIAN FOOD INDUSTRY The main aim of the paper is to assess the international competitiveness of the Croatian food industry by deploying the Constant Market Share (CMS) analysis. The CMS model is able to quantify the export performance of the food industry compared to the rest of the world and individual foreign markets (the EU 27, new member states). The analysis revealed rather disappointing results in terms of the competitive position of the Croatian food industry in the period after 2010. The CMS was able to decompose change in the market share based on the geographic and product component and competitiveness effect, and the results confirmed the hypothesis that the loss in competitiveness of the Croatian food industry is the most important factor which determined the decreasing share of Croatian companies in world trade. The impact of the product mix of exported food products was neutral while its geographical effect was also negative. A regional reorientation of exports to more dynamic markets is an option which could boost the exports of the Croatian food industry. Keywords: Croatian food industry, export competitiveness, CMS analysis, the EU JEL Classifications: F 10, C 60 DOI: 10.15611/aoe.2018.2.06 1. INTRODUCTION The promotion of the competitiveness of the European Union (EU) in global markets is recognized as an integral part of the EU’s 2020 strategy (European Commission, 2010). In a globalized economy, openness and international trade are crucial elements of development strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • TILURIUM Roman Military Camp Exhibition Guide
    TILURIUM Roman Military Camp Exhibition Guide TRILJ REGIONAL MUSEUM Research publications of the Trilj Regional Museum Trilj, 2020 Publisher Reviewer Trilj Regional Museum Prof. Mirjana Sanader, PhD For the publisher: Proofreaders Sanja Budić Leto Katja Tresić-Pavičić Editors Translation Sanja Budić Leto, Danica Šantić TILURIUM Angela Tabak, Domagoj Tončinić Graphic design Roman Military Camp Ana Luketin Fahrenwald, Authors of the Nikola Križanac exhibition and guidebook Exhibition Guide Angela Tabak, Print Domagoj Tončinić, Kerschoffset, Zagreb Danijela Petričević Print run Authors of photographs 700 copies Zoran Alajbeg (Figures 2.1, 2.2, 5-23, 25-30, The publication of the 32, 33, 36-40, 43, 45, 49, 50), guidebook was financially Ante Verzotti supported by the Croatian (Figures 47, 48), Ministry of Culture,Town Archives of research of Trilj and Split-Dalmatia projects Roman Military County. Encampments in Croatia - Tilurium (Figures 2, 2.3, 2.5), The presented results which Angela Tabak (Figure 3) have emerged from the research project, Roman Military Camps in Croatia, were carried out with a support of the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia. PREFACE Trilj Regional Museum was founded in 1996 by the Town of Trilj with the goal of preserving local archaeological, ethnographic, cultural and historical material and immaterial heritage as well as presenting it locally and globally. In 2006, the Museum opened its doors to visitors, offering them numerous events: workshops, lectures and presentations, periodical exhibitions and various museum manifestations. The permanent exhibition Tilurium - Roman military camp was set up in 2009 and it represents the first ten years of research of Roman military camp Tilurium in the village Gardun near Trilj.
    [Show full text]
  • A New GIS Procedure for the Reconstruction of the Landscape in Classical Antiquity (Territory of Today Croatia)”
    Begović V., Schrunk I., Kereković D. (2011). The project “A new GIS procedure for the reconstruction of the landscape in classical antiquity (territory of today Croatia)”. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). The Future with GIS. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 82-93. THE PROJECT "A NEW GIS PROCEDURE FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE LANDSCAPE IN CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY (territory of today Croatia)" Vlasta Begović Institute of Archaeology Gajeva 32, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia Ivančica Schrunk University of St. Thomas St. Paul, Minnesota 55105, USA Davorin Kereković GIS Forum Ilica 191 e, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia Abstract In the course of the ongoing research project “Archaeological Topography of Croatia in Classical Antiquity” the application of a new GIS procedure made it possible to make reconstructions of some Roman sites and past landscapes (landscape in classical antiquity) on the territory of today Croatia. The GIS approach to the study of changes in historical landscapes indicated that the greatest transformation of the landscape occurred in the Roman period. Territorial creativity was high in the Roman time, when a completely new landscape identity appeared after the 2nd/1st century BC in Dalmatia and Histria, and after the 1st century AD in Pannonia. The new markers in the landscape consisted of: 1) Military camps; 2) Cities – colonies and settlements; 3) Roman villas; 4) A network of roads and aqueducts. Agro-forestry landscapes were unbalanced even in prehistory, with clearing of forests and expansion of agriculture. However, the most noticeable changes came in the Roman period with new exploitation of the land and the intensive planting of new cash crops - grape (vineyards) and olive trees in Dalmatia and Histria, and wheat and other cereals in Pannonia.
    [Show full text]