DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A) NFS Form 10-900 OMBNo. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service L-- National Register of Historic Places NAT. RFGIS Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property ____ historic name Chain Bridge Road School____________________________________________________ other names _______________________________________________________ 2. Location street & number 2820 Chain Bridge Road not for publication city or town Washington, DC __ D vicinity state District of Columbia code DC county code 001 zip code 20016 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this 0"nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentatibn standards for registering properties in the National Registered-Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property Srneets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally GJstatewide D locally. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments). , / Si^nalfire©of certifying officialnitle t)at^ / ^ /3>3yG ^JC?L^ State or Federal agency and bureau "*"" In my opinion, the property D meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments). Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby, certify that this property is: Date of Action ^entered in the National Register. D See continuation sheet. D determined eligible for the National Register. D See continuation sheet. D Determined not eligible for the National Register. D removed from the National Register. D other (explain): ___________ Chain Bridge Road School Washington, D.C. Name of Property County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count) ^ private IE1 building(s) Contributing Noncontributing D public-local D district buildings D public-State D site sites D public-Federal D structure structures D object objects Total Name of related multiple property listing number of contributing resources previously (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) listed in the National Register 0 Public School Buildings of Washington, D.C.: 1864-1960 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) EDUCATION/School NOT IN USE/Vacant 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Colonial Revival foundation masonry walls stucco roof Standing seam metal other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets) Chain Bridge Road School Washington, D.C. Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Area of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for (Enter categories from instructions) National Register listing) Architecture, Education, [3 A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our History. D B Property associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ^ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, Period of Significance or represents a significant and distinguishable entity 1923-41 Whose components lack individual distinction. D D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Significant Dates Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply) 1923 Property is: D A Owned by a religious institution or used for religious Significant Person purposes. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) D B removed from its original location. D C a birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation D D a cemetery. D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. D F a commemorative property. Architect/Builder D G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance Albert Harris, Municipal Architect within the past 50 years. Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets) Previous documentation on files (NPS): Primary location of additional data: D preliminary determination of individual listing (36 Kl State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested D Other State agency D previously listed in the National Register D Federal agency D previously determined eligible by the National Register D Local government D designated a National Historic Landmark D University [H recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey D Other #_______________________ Name of repository: D recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # Chain Bridge Road School Washington, D.C. Name of Property County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 21,780 square feet UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) 1 8 3 1 8 248 4 3 1 0 799 1 | | | 1 1 | | , , , , Zone Easting Northing Zone EJlisting Northing 1 | I | I | 1 1 1 D See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet) 11. Form Prepared By name/title Laura Trieschmann, Architectural Historian Organization EHT Traceries______________ date 02/22/02 -th street & number 1121 5m Street, NW telephone 393-1199 city or town Washington, D.C.___ state zip code 20001 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps X A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property©s location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs X Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional Items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner ____ _______ _______ ___ (Complete this item at the request of SHPO or FPO) name H. Gabriel Murphy, Trustee, et al______________________________ street & number 2762 Chain Bridge Road telephone city or town Washington, D.C.______ state zip code 20016 Paperwork Reduction Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et. seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places —— Chain Bridge Road School Continuationf\ A- A- Sheet« _ j. Name of Property Washington, D.C. Section 7 Page _1_ County and State Description Summary: The Chain Bridge Road School is a two-story masonry structure, set in the rural landscape of northwest Washington, D.C. The building was constructed in 1923 and designed in a Colonial Revival style. It is a rectangular block set upon a solid masonry foundation and clad in stucco. A shallow-pitched hipped roof, clad in standing seam metal, covers the building. A narrow bedmolding of wood and a boxed cornice of metal mark the deep overhang of the roof. A single interior brick chimney projects from the northern slope of the roof and a metal exhaust hood pierces the southern slope. + General Description: Site: The Chain Bridge Road School is located at 2820 Chain Bridge Road in northwest Washington, D.C. (Square 1425, Lot 814). The present school is sited on property originally improved by an 1865 school building,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Civil War Defenses of Washington
    I 29.58/3: C 49/PT.2/DRAFT Clemson Universi* 3 1604 016 848 964 A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington PUBLIC DEPOSITORY ITEM OCT 1 7 2006 FEDERAL CLfctvioON PUBl CATIOH PAP>" A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part II United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/historicresource02nati A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part II Table Contents Chapter I: Silenced Guns Chapter II: The "Fort-Capped Hills" Chapter III: The Fort Park System Bibliography Appendices* Appendices are under separate cover Chapter I Silenced Guns Civil Defenses of Washington Historic Resource Study Page 2 DRAFT Chapter I - June 1998 Abandonment of the Fortifications Following Confederate General Jubal A. Early's Raid on Washington, DC, the threat to the nation's capital diminished considerably. Many units formerly stationed at one of the forts in the Defenses of Wash- ington found themselves in the field, most likely in the Army of the Potomac, and possibly converted from artillery to infantry. No additional Confederate invasions or attacks on the Defenses of Washington oc- curred. 1 After the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia's surrender at Appomattox, VA, on April 9, 1 865, the Defenses ofWashington performed its last military function of the Civil War. In the midst of Washington's exuberant celebrations, "The chain of forts around the city, and batteries of field artillery between, made a ring of cannons around the city which were fired in rotation for several hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Dummy Spreads
    Washington’s Civil War Defenses hen Dickinson visited Forts Ward and Barnard in 1918, they were already sixty-year-old ruins, but visible. Today, Washington’s Civil War forts are almost Wone hundred and fifty years old and when extant, barely visible. The earthwork forts, whose trenches Dickinson captured in his Fort Barnard drawing, are far softer mounds today, almost indistinguishable from their surrounding landscape, and in the case of Fort Barnard, nothing remains at all. It became a public park and playground at the intersection of today’s South Pollard Street and Walter Reed Drive in Arlington. Fort Ward, on the other hand, became a City of Alexandria historic site, and as a result, is the only fort with exten- sive reconstruction and a museum with interpretive programs. Arlington’s Fort Whipple The Union army’s defeat at the Battle of Bull Barnard’s report described Fort Barnard as was the only fortification location to become a permanent military establishment—today’s Run (Manassas) in July 1861, demonstrated the occupying a commanding position. “It covers the Fort Myer. urgent need for a well-trained army and far greater head of ravines, in which large bodies of troops can On April 12, 1861, the Civil War began with the battle of Fort Sumter. President fortification for the capital city. Major (later Major be collected and concealed in a favorable position Lincoln immediately issued orders for the fortification of Washington, which was virtually Brevet General) John Gross Barnard of the Army for making flank attacks upon an enemy’s columns Corps of Engineers assumed leadership of the city’s assaulting our lines between it and Fort Craig, or defenseless and surrounded by hostile Virginia and Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War Defenses of Washington
    A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F.
    [Show full text]
  • MAPS FINDING AID Albert H. Small Washingtoniana Collection Contents
    Page 1 of 15 MAPS FINDING AID Albert H. Small Washingtoniana Collection Contents: 17th Century, page 2 18th Century, page 2 19th Century, Pre-Civil War, page 3 19th Century, Civil War, page 6 19th Century, Post-Civil War, page 7 20th Century, page 12 21st Century, page 15 THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MUSEUM & THE TEXTILE MUSEUM | 701 21st NW | Washington, DC 20052 | 202-994-5200 | museum.gwu.edu Page 2 of 15 17th CENTURY 1606 Virginia (modern reproduction). Captain John Smith’s map engraved by William Hole. Date of original map: 1606. Reproduced by the Library of Congress. AS 977. 1651 Historical Maps of Maryland (modern reproductions). Four historical reproduction maps of Maryland and Virginia reprinted from Atlas of Maryland, 1608-1908. Original maps date to 1651,1671, 1678, and 1752. AS 974. 1671 Noua Terrae-Mariae, Tabula. Date: 1671. This map appeared in John Ogilby’s Atlas America. It is the second edition of a 1635 map. AS 707. 1673 The Herman Map of Virginia and Maryland, 1673 (facsimile from the original at Brown University, published 1967). Original title, Virginia and Maryland, Original publisher Augustin Herrman. AS 853. 18th CENTURY 1750 Pas Kaart van de Zee Kusten van Virginia. Published by Johannis van Keveen in the Netherlands. Date: ca. 1750. AS 805. 1765 A Map of North America, 1765. Published by L. Delarochette, London. Hand colored engraving – outline showing North America, Mexico, Central America, and parts of Canada. AS 948. 1766 A Plan of My Farm on Little Hunting Creek & Potomac River, G.W., 1766. Modern digital copy of a map drawn by George Washington of one of his farms at Mount Vernon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices
    A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory Fort Marcy
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2015 Fort Marcy George Washington Memorial Parkway Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Fort Marcy George Washington Memorial Parkway Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI) is an evaluated inventory of all significant landscapes in units of the national park system in which the National Park Service has, or plans to acquire any enforceable legal interest. Landscapes documented through the CLI are those that individually meet criteria set forth in the National Register of Historic Places such as historic sites, historic designed landscapes, and historic vernacular landscapes or those that are contributing elements of properties that meet the criteria. In addition, landscapes that are managed as cultural resources because of law, policy, or decisions reached through the park planning process even though they do not meet the National Register criteria, are also included in the CLI. The CLI serves three major purposes. First, it provides the means to describe cultural landscapes on an individual or collective basis at the park, regional, or service-wide level. Secondly, it provides a platform to share information about cultural landscapes across programmatic areas and concerns and to integrate related data about these resources into park management. Thirdly, it provides an analytical tool to judge accomplishment and accountability. The legislative, regulatory, and policy direction for conducting the CLI include: ional Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC 470h-2(a)(1)).
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War Defenses of Washington
    A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I -- ---------------- A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification # 1 Prepared by CEHP, ·Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland ror sale by the Superintendent of Documelll •• U.S. Governmenl Printing Office !tHernel: bookslorc.gpo.gov Phone: loll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-180n Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: SlOP SSOP. Washington. DC 20402·0001 ISBN 0-16-072708-1 A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I Table of Contents Chapter I. An Introduction to the Civil War Defenses of Washington Chapter II. Pre-Civil War Defenses Chapter III. The Land and the Owners Chapter IV. The Civil War Years Chapter V. The Fortification System Chapter VI. Maintenance of the Defenses Chapter VII. Jubal Early's Raid/ The Battle of Fort Stevens Selected Photographs and Illustrations Appendices ·to * Appendices are under separate cover ----- Chapter I An Introduction to the Civil War Defenses of Washington -------- Civil War Defenses of Washington Historic Resources Study Pan I-I CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION TO THE CIVil WAR DEFENSES OF WASHINGTON The Historic Resources Study of the Civil War Defenses of Washington was completed for the Capitol Region of the National Park Service to serve a variety of purposes. 1. To provide a narrative overview and analytical history of the parks. 2. To comprehensively document the history of the Civil War Defenses of Washington and its features. 3. To provide a historical framework for future preservation efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Seg3at Enebasm Ss -Aaehes .1 Et Q
    Pert Namsmeld esasieta of two redeabe sad fue iW~h views are m r eatertor battery. connected a eptmdn pgesate, * by ride trench. tere Firsw ball Ra. and the rebe11:0ese r a of Iwssws >a, w'6 t te. Ise--medesta he to.o wso h of Elver road. about a mile a good state prservatin, The stream s ms w had a and oud be seen from the dome of the Capttol Lanks the The 1is known Fert U tg. wed on Is the t 'i.e. gool part at mo wm .3G amttt~ hat ftaa Tenteytowa. .nd was named after The New York tesk e northern side. The plae was kneen the sesetb aid, of the Brentweed a bet Ge.e. C Nigw.il a o the "ap ta. A p thI athem as-et pee- th-wele -en eeengtd by Qhe Sen- tweaty-fret poesemion as read, flub na.es Joseph n. V. Mansfeld. who died at Munon's hill and its gMes .pon thb "orvli" befen the war, pad the old east of it ereasse New Tes. the snemb yeo m es bbu g.4nrx. IL. wp II. U12. of wounds re- Q-taker where the Queen's Cabiel As,e pr.te nd irmue are daing withdrawal of the eafederatse. septemsber ! eolonial-looking mansion at the feet of the a b i.moi. sywe euidmus -d -esa te d i. .'&.iadaa. This gallant ofMeer did send, about two and half iles south of ths mateped1dwJ s Ptee'.1......branes Pethe.. , . meat and A debbm 1i841.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Civil War Maps in the National Archives
    AGUIDETO CIVIL WAR MAPS ~IN~ THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 1986 Cover: Map of the Battlefield of Antietam, prepared by Lieut. Wm. H. Willcox (RG 77: G 443, vol. 9, p. 10). ISBN 0-911333-36-3 PUBLISHED FOR THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION BY THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES TRUST FUND BOARD Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A Guide to Civil War maps in the National Archives. Includes index. 1. United States-History-Civil War, 1861-1865- Maps-Bibliography-Catalogs. 2. United States. National Archives-Catalogs. I. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Z1242.G85 1986 [468.9) 016.911'73 86-5132 ISBN 0-911333-36-3 FOREWORD The National Archives and Records Administration is responsible for administering the per­ manently valuable records of the Federal Government. These archival holdings, now amounting to more than 1.3 million cubic feet, date from the days of the Continental Congress and include the basic records of the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of the Federal Government. The Presidential libraries of Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Gerald R. Ford contain the papers of those Presidents and many of their associates in office. NARA is also responsible for the presidential papers of Richard M. Nixon, which are stored in the Washington, D.C., area, and of Jimmy Carter, which are stored in Atlanta, Ga. These research resources document significant events in our Nation's history, but most of them are preserved for their continuing practical use in the ordinary processes of government and for the research use of scholars, students, and other individual researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sketch of the Natural History of the District of Columbia Together With
    (OdU Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington No. f A SKETCH OF THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TOGETHER WITH AN INDEXED EDITION OF THE U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S 1917 MAP OF WASHINGTON AND VICINITY BY W. L. McATEE WASHINGTON, D. C. MAY, 1918 Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington No. I A SKETCH OF THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TOGETHER WITH AN INDEXED EDITION OF THE U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY'S 1917 MAP OF WASHINGTON AND VICINITY 22096 BY W. L. McATEE WASHINGTON, D. C. MAY, 1918 « ' ' < . • . • • • • • • „• • • * ** I * * • • • • € «•• « • • • Press of H. L. & J. B. McQUEEN, Inc. Washington, D. C. CONTENTS. PAGE Historical sketch 5 Introduction 5 Botany 14 Insects 24 Other invertebrates 42 Fishes 43 Batrachians and reptiles 44 Birds 46 Mammals 52 Early History of Man in the District 54 Distribution of life in the District of Columbia region . 57 The Piedmont Plateau and Coastal Plain as faunal and floral provinces 57 Magnolia bogs near Washington, D, C, and their relation to the pine barrens 74 Other types of collecting grounds in the District of Columbia region 90 Index to the U. S. Geological Survey's 1917 Map of Wash- ington and vicinity 110 Introduction 110 Bibliography 112 List of maps used 115 Index 119 MAPS The Piedmont Plateau and the Coastal Plain in the vicinity of the District of Columbia. Page 61, also in pocket inside back cover. Washington and Vicinity. U. S. Geological Survey, 1917. Quartered and with index ruling. In pocket inside back cover. [3 HISTORICAL SKETCH.
    [Show full text]
  • Section II Fort Ward Park and Museum Area Management Plan Acknowledgements
    Fort Ward Park and Museum Area Management Plan ALEXA F N D O Y R T I A I C V I A SeT i C ion i R G I N I The City of Alexandria, Virginia October 2014 FINAL DRAFT Section ii Fort Ward Park and MuSeuM area ManageMent Plan Acknowledgements City Council William D. Euille, Mayor Allison Silberberg, Vice Mayor John T. Chapman Timothy B. Lovain Redella S. “Del” Pepper Paul C. Smedberg Justin Wilson Ad Hoc Fort Ward Park and Museum Area Stakeholder Advisory Group (FWAG or SAG) Roster as of 1/2014 Member Group Ripley Forbes Park and Recreation Commission Linda Ries (resigned 2014) Park and Recreation Commission Robert Moir Park and Recreation Commission Charles (Chuck) Ziegler Historic Alexandria Resources Commission Ellen Stanton Historic Alexandria Resources Commission Janice Magnuson Historic Alexandria Resources Commission Ryan Sloan (replaced by Susan Gitlin 2014) Environmental Policy Commission Adrienne Washington Fort Ward/Seminary African American Descendants Society Lena Rainey Oakland Baptist Church Frances Terrell Seminary Civic Association Sharon Annear Seminary Hill Association, Inc. James Walpole (resigned May 2014) Citizen at Large Richard Brune Citizen at Large Vacant Citizen Living within One Mile Radius Prepared by: Lardner/Klein Landscape Architects, P.C. Heritage Strategies, Inc. John Milner Associates, Inc. Barbara Franco Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities Park Planning, Design and Capital Development Staff In coordination with: Office of Historic Alexandria Transportation & Environmental Services b Final draFt October 2014 Fort Ward Park and MuSeuM area ManageMent Plan Section ii Table of Contents Sectioni i Acknowledgements City Council Ad Hoc Fort Ward Park and Museum Area Stakeholder Advisory Group (FWAG or SAG) Roster as of 1/2014 1.
    [Show full text]