DOCSLIB.ORG

August 2011 Stream Assessment Presentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
August 2011 Stream Assessment Presentation County-wide Stream Assessment August 2011 Outline Ø Arlington Watershed Management Overview Ø Stream inventory objectives and methods Ø Results and Prioritization Ø Next Steps Arlington Watershed Facts •2009 Census: 209,300 people •26.5 square miles •7,898 persons/square mile •42% impervious cover •334 miles of storm sewers •28.5 miles of perennial streams •Potomac River watershed •42% impervious cover •334 miles of storm sewers •28.5 miles of perennial streams Arlington’s Stormwater Challenges Ø Impacts and limits from existing land use and historic drainage decisions Ø Aging infrastructure Ø System capacity Ø Degraded water quality and stream corridors Ø Tightening state and federal regulations Ø Climate change Arlington’s Stormwater Strategy Ø Implement urban housekeeping ‘best practices’ (e.g., street sweeping, catch basin cleaning, pollution prevention, etc.) Ø Reduce flood risks Ø Maintain stormwater infrastructure Ø Require on-site stormwater controls for development Ø Implement watershed retrofits Ø Restore stream corridors Ø Outreach and education Ø Monitoring Stormwater Master Plan Update Ø Stormwater Master Plan (1996) and Watershed Management Plan (2001) will be updated and combined into a comprehensive Master Plan. l Storm Sewer Capacity Analysis to analyze the County's current storm sewer system. l County-wide stream inventory to assess stream conditions and prioritize stream restoration projects. l Watershed retrofit plans to identify locations where stormwater treatment facilities can be added to help slow down and filter stormwater runoff. Objectives and Methods Stream Inventory Objectives Ø Determine stream conditions to prioritize stream restoration projects for County’s Stormwater Master Plan update Ø Evaluate condition of storm and sanitary sewer infrastructure in stream valleys Ø Characterize in-stream habitat and riparian buffer condition as secondary prioritization tool Ø Also a complementary element to Natural Resources Management Plan, which includes several recommendations for protection and management of stream corridors Stream Inventory Approach Ø 23.5 miles assessed by County consultant, Vanasse, Hangen, Brustlin (VHB) Inc. Ø Channel Evolution Model (CEM) applied to determine reach state, accounting for partial and full stabilization with concrete, rip-rap, etc. Ø U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Unified Stream Methodology Stream Assessment Reach (SAR) approach applied to establish stream reaches and characterize in-stream habitat and riparian buffer condition Ø Stormwater outfall and sanitary sewer/water infrastructure conditions evaluated using the Center for Watershed Protection’s Unified Stream Assessment methodology Ø Other data collected include Rosgen stream classification, flow regime (e.g., perennial, ephemeral, etc.), and Cowardin wetland classification. Streams Not Included Ø Prior assessment: l Donaldson Run Tributary B (upcoming restoration) l Little Pimmit Run Ø Streams not assessed: l Washington Golf and Country Club (private property with no current relationship with property owner, unlike ANCC) l Arlington Cemetery/Ft Myer (federal ownership) l Donaldson Run Tributary A (previously restored) l Four Mile Run below Shirlington Road (Flood control project under study/restoration design by US Army Corps of Engineers as well as City/County consultant) Channel Evolution Model Ø Uses several field indicators to describe physical conditions and departure from an equilibrium or balanced condition l Active and abandoned floodplain features l Headcutting/downcutting l Vertical and concave streambanks l Bank slumping l Meander-bend migration l Streambed aggradation Ø Each of these indicators helps to define existing conditions and predict future channel change Undermined trees Artificial hardening Floodplain Floodplain ‘DISCONNECTION’ Straightened channel Stage 2/3 Tributary A, Segment A2, February 2004 Floodplain Curvature/meander pattern Step pool slope control Floodplain ‘CONNECTION’ Stage 1/5 Tributary A, Segment A2, November 2009 Infrastructure Condition Ø Stormwater outfall infrastructure – focus on physical pipe condition and downslope erosion Ø Utility infrastructure – focus on extent of pipe exposure/undermining and surrounding stream conditions (mostly sanitary sewer) Ø Ranking system from 1 (good) to 5 (severe) Results and Prioritization Channel Evolution Model Stage County-wide 1/5 0.2 0.8 2.3 2.5 1% 3% 1/2 9% 10% 2 3.8 2/3 16% 2.6 11% 3 3/4 5.7 4 6.6 23% 27% 4/5 Miles of stream per category 9.2 miles (34%) of stream in actively degrading channel condition 3.7 miles (40%) with some form of stabilization 10.4 miles (43%) in transition to equilibrium - can take decades Streams in Stages 2 and 3… Ø Continue to erode their banks and beds, sending sediment downstream to smother aquatic habitat and degrade water quality Ø Damage infrastructure, including sanitary sewers and trails Ø Are not safe for park users Ø Undermine trees near the stream Sediment and Nutrients Unrestored Donaldson Run Restored Donaldson Run Tributary with visibly higher Tributary with visibly lower sediment content sediment content Priority Watersheds by Channel Condition These watersheds have the most length of channel in CEM stages 2 and 3 and the least amount of stabilization measures in place for these reaches Donaldson Run Windy Run Four Mile Run Upper Mainstem 2 Palisades Gulf Branch Pimmit Run Priority Watersheds by Channel Condition Windy Run Example Channel Evolution Model Stage 0 0% 0 63 0 1/5 0% 1% 0% 1/2 2 1,408 1,370 2/3 25% 24% 3 0 3/4 0% 4 4/5 2,863 50% Linear feet of stream per category 4,233 linear feet (74%) of stream in actively degrading channel condition Only 254 linear feet (6%) with some form of stabilization 1,408 linear feet (25%) in transition to equilibrium - can take decades Stormwater Outfall Conditions County-wide 4 5 15 20 3 5% 27 4% 6% n=412 2 63 15% 1 287 70% 35 stormwater outfalls with severity score 4 or 5 Stream Valley Sanitary Sewer Conditions County-wide 5 5 5% 4 8 3 8% 10 n=107 9% 2 13 12% 1 71 66% 13 sanitary sewer lines with severity score 4 or 5 Data provided to DES Water/Sewer/Streets for evaluation In-stream Habitat Conditions Riparian Buffer Conditions County-wide County-wide Optimal 8,240 6% Poor Poor 22,546 33,453 18% Optimal 27% 38,205 30% Suboptimal 35,223 28% Marginal 33,921 27% Marginal Suboptimal 48,657 30,902 39% 25% 66% of reaches in marginal or 45% of reaches in marginal or poor category poor category Qualitative evaluation of physical Qualitative evaluation of buffer habitat elements to support composition (emphasis on canopy aquatic organisms trees) and width Prioritization Focus on Actively Degrading Streams and Significant Infrastructure Problems Prioritization at watershed scale Reaches in most actively degrading CEM categories (2, 2/3, and 3) without stabilization Outfalls in worst condition (4 and 5) Utilities in worst condition (4 and 5) Priority Watersheds by Channel & Infrastructure Condition Gulf Branch Windy Run Donaldson Run Pimmit Run Palisades Next Steps Ø Evaluate priority watersheds to establish discrete stream restoration projects Ø Criteria will include reach and infrastructure conditions and proximity to other priority reaches Ø Look at inter-relationships with Natural Resources Management Plan features and recommendations Ø Refine ‘physical restoration access’ score Ø Determine which priority reaches on County-owned land or under County drainage easement Ø More detailed field assessment for up to one mile of discrete projects Ø Establish project budgets and schedules for priority projects Ø Update stream GIS layer Questions/Need More Information? Jason Papacosma 703 228 3613 [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SPRINGS of ARLINGTON Celebrating the Restoration of the Historical Donaldson Spring at Potomac Overlook Regional Park, May 1, 1988
    SPRINGS OF ARLINGTON Celebrating the restoration of the historical Donaldson Spring at Potomac Overlook Regional Park, May 1, 1988. By Eleanor Lee Templeman What a lovely word, not only to name the most beautiful season, but to indicate water rising, or springing, from the earth! There is a certain magic in water flowing from the depths of dry soil. The surrounding dampness encourages the growth of ferns and wild flowers. Water is essential for the life of man, flora and fauna. The world's great deserts would have remained uninhabited without the oasis. From prehistoric times, springs have played an important role in the lives of humans. The Donaldson Spring in Potomac Overlook Regional Park was the site of an Indian hunting and fishing camp. There is evidence that it was also their burial ground. Pioneer families chose their home sites adjacent to springs, and many constructed stone springhouses over them. Here in the cool water were stored milk, butter and other perishables. Each spring has its individual tradition. The one which we honor today symbolizes the linking of two of the earliest local families, the Donaldsons and the Marceys, who intermarried as was the custom in rural communities. Throughout Virginia, all the most important plantation homes were estab­ lished adjacent to this important water supply. The abundance of springs on the hillside above the Potomac at Mount Vernon decided the house location and supplied water to the estate from the settlement of the first of the Washington family in the 1700s until a very recent date. Mount Vernon's former Director, Cecil Wall, since his retirement a few years ago, comes weekly to a flowing spring in the woods to fill his jug with the pure sweet water, refusing to drink from the municipal supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Mackintosh Park History Program National Park Service
    GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY Barry Mackintosh Park History Program National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, DC 1996 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 I. THE MOUNT VERNON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY • • • 7 II. THE CAPPER-CRAMTON ACT 21 III. EXPANDING THE PARKWAY, 1931-1952 • 33 IV. EXPANDING THE PARKWAY, 1952-1970 57 V. THE UNFINISHED PARKWAY. 87 VI. ARLINGTON HOUSE .•• . • 117 VII. THEODORE ROOSEVELT ISLAND . • 133 VIII. OTHER ADDITIONS AND SUBTRACTIONS • . • • . 147 Fort Hunt •.. • • . • • . • • . 147 Jones Point . • • . • • . • . • • . • • . • • • . 150 Dyke Marsh and Daingerfield Island . • • • . • • . • 153 Arlington Memorial Bridge, Memorial Drive, and Columbia Island • . • • • • • • . • • • • . • . • 164 The Nevius Tract • • . • . • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • 176 Merrywood and the Riverfront Above Chain Bridge • • • . 184 Fort Marcy . • • • • . • • • • . • • . • • • . 187 The Langley Tract and Turkey Run Farm • • • • . • • • 188 Glen Echo Park and Clara Barton National Historic site • 190 GWMP Loses Ground • • • . • • • • .. • . • • . • • • 197 INTRODUCTION The George Washington Memorial Parkway is among the most complex and unusual units of the national park system. The GWMP encompasses some 7,428 acres in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. For reasons that will later be explained, a small part of this acreage is not administered by its superintendent, and a greater amount of land formerly within GWMP now lies within another national park unit. Some of the GWMP acreage the superintendent administers is commonly known by other names, like Great Falls Park in Virginia and Glen Echo Park in Maryland. While most national park units may be characterized as predominantly natural, historical, or recreational, GWMP comprises such a diverse array of natural, historic, and recreational resources that it defies any such categorization. Further complicating matters, GWMP's superintendent also administers four other areas classed as discrete national park units-Arlington House, The Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Overview, Lyndon
    Description NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR RIVERBEND 189 PARK Lyndon Baines Johnson Memorial R Great ive 495 r Falls Ro ad d R B Grove on the Potomac was established r s ic ll k a ya F r d Ro 190 ad Great Falls Park C&O CANAL by Congress on December 28, NATIONAL American Legion MARYLAND HISTORICAL Memorial Bridge PARK Exit 40 1973, through Public Law 93-211. C a Naval Surface Warfare Center b in Foundation Document Overview 495 (Carderock Division) Jo Washington, D.C. h Maryland n The memorial is intended to honor 738 P C M k a a thur B w O r cAr oule Clara Barton National Historic Site l d Exit 41 vard y d er o D ck President Lyndon B. Johnson and o G Clar m a Bar e ton Lyndon Baines Johnson Memorial Grove on the Potomac i o Parkw n rg a io e y ROCK n to Glen Echo Park w D n Exit 43 recognize his achievements in r i Pik CREEK v e n e u R 193 Turkey Run Park PARK District of Columbia y Parkway e preserving the nation’s environment, k Headquarters r u Exit 44 T l d a i R n 193 M.D. n o as well as his love of the land. It was l m VA. u 738 r o R a C F d a e D 495 privately funded and planned, but 123 Claude Moore Colonial Farm 123 267 was dedicated to the public as a unit Exit 45 t mi Run Little Pim G Falls Fort Marcy e Chain Bridge o of the National Park Service, serving rg WASHINGTON, e W anc 123 Exit 46 Br h a as a place where people can enjoy the 267 lf s u h D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor Analysis for the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail in Northern Virginia
    Corridor Analysis For The Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail In Northern Virginia June 2011 Acknowledgements The Northern Virginia Regional Commission (NVRC) wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to this report: Don Briggs, Superintendent of the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail for the National Park Service; Liz Cronauer, Fairfax County Park Authority; Mike DePue, Prince William Park Authority; Bill Ference, City of Leesburg Park Director; Yon Lambert, City of Alexandria Department of Transportation; Ursula Lemanski, Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program for the National Park Service; Mark Novak, Loudoun County Park Authority; Patti Pakkala, Prince William County Park Authority; Kate Rudacille, Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority; Jennifer Wampler, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation; and Greg Weiler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The report is an NVRC staff product, supported with funds provided through a cooperative agreement with the National Capital Region National Park Service. Any assessments, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report represent the results of the NVRC staff’s technical investigation and do not represent policy positions of the Northern Virginia Regional Commission unless so stated in an adopted resolution of said Commission. The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the jurisdictions, the National Park Service, or any of its sub agencies. Funding for this report was through a cooperative agreement with The National Park Service Report prepared by: Debbie Spiliotopoulos, Senior Environmental Planner Northern Virginia Regional Commission with assistance from Samantha Kinzer, Environmental Planner The Northern Virginia Regional Commission 3060 Williams Drive, Suite 510 Fairfax, VA 22031 703.642.0700 www.novaregion.org Page 2 Northern Virginia Regional Commission As of May 2011 Chairman Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Access Points Within 50 Miles of Capitol Hill
    Public Access Points within 50 Miles of Capitol Hill Public Access Point Boat Ramp Fishing Swimming Restrooms Hiking/Trekking Location 2900 Virginia Ave NW, Thompson's Boat Center X X X X Washington, DC 20037 3244 K St NW, Washington, DC Georgetown Waterfront Park X X 20007 George Washington Memorial Theodore Roosevelt Island X X X Pkwy N, Arlington, VA 22209 West Basin Dr SW, Washington, West Potomac Park X X DC 20024 Capital Crescent Trail, Washington Canoe Club X Washington, DC 20007 600 Water St SW, Washington, DC Ganglplank Marina X X X X 20024 George Washington Memorial Columbia Island Marina X X X Parkway, Arlington, VA 22202 99 Potomac Ave. SE. Washington, Diamond Teague Park X X DC 20003 335 Water Street Washington, DC The Yards Park X 20003 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE, Anacostia Boat House X Washington, DC 20003 700-1000 Water St SW, Washington Marina X X X X Washington, DC 20024 Anacostia Park, Section E Anacostia Marina X X X Washington, DC 20003 2001-2099 1st St SW, Washington, Buzzard's Point Marina X X X DC 20003 2038-2068 2nd St SW, James Creek Marina X X X Washington, DC 20593 Anacostia Dr, Washington, DC Anacostia Park X X X 20019 Heritage Island Trail, Washington, Heritage Island X DC 20002 Kingman Island Trail, Washington, Kingman Island X DC 20002 Mt Vernon Trail, Arlington, VA Gravelly Point X X 22202 George Washington Memorial Roaches Run X X X X Pkwy, Arlington, VA 22202 1550 Anacostia Ave NE, Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens/Park X X X Washington, DC 20019 Capital Crescent Trail, Jack's Boat House X X Washington, DC 20007 Daingerfield Island X X X X 1 Marina Dr, Alexandria, VA 22314 67-101 Dale St, Alexandria, VA Four Mile Run Park/Trail X X X 22305 4601 Annapolis Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington County, Virginia (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 1 OF 1 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ARLINGTON COUNTY, 515520 UNINCORPORATED AREAS PRELIMINARY 9/18/2020 REVISED: TBD FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 51013CV000B Version Number 2.6.4.6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 13 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 13 2.2 Floodways 17 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 18 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 19 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 19 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 19 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 21 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 21 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 22 SECTION 3.0 – INSURANCE APPLICATIONS 22 3.1 National Flood Insurance Program Insurance Zones 22 SECTION 4.0 – AREA STUDIED 22 4.1 Basin Description 22 4.2 Principal Flood Problems 23 4.3 Non-Levee Flood Protection Measures 24 4.4 Levees 24 SECTION 5.0 – ENGINEERING METHODS 27 5.1 Hydrologic Analyses 27 5.2 Hydraulic Analyses 32 5.3 Coastal Analyses 37 5.3.1 Total Stillwater Elevations 38 5.3.2 Waves 38 5.3.3 Coastal Erosion 38 5.3.4 Wave Hazard Analyses 38 5.4 Alluvial Fan Analyses 39 SECTION 6.0 – MAPPING METHODS 39 6.1 Vertical and Horizontal Control 39 6.2 Base Map 40 6.3 Floodplain and Floodway Delineation 41 6.4 Coastal Flood Hazard Mapping 51 6.5 FIRM
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Corridor Analysis of the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail in Northern Virginia
    2015 Corridor Analysis Of the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail in Northern Virginia 0 http://www.novaregion.org/index.aspx?nid=299 Acknowledgements The Northern Virginia Regional Commission (NVRC) thanks the following individuals for their contributions to this report: • Donald Briggs, Superintendent of the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail for the National Park Service; • Ursula Lemanski, Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program for the National Park Service; • Mark Novak, Loudoun County Park Authority; • Debbie Andrews of Prince William County Department of Parks and Recreation; and • Members of the Potomac Heritage Trail Association. The report is an NVRC staff product, supported with funds provided by a cooperative agreement with the National Capital Region National Park Service (Grant Cooperative Agreement P14AC01704). Any assessments, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report represent the results of the NVRC staff’s technical investigation and do not represent policy positions of the Northern Virginia Regional Commission unless so stated in an adopted resolution of said Commission. The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the jurisdictions, the National Park Service, or any of its sub agencies. Report prepared by: Corey Miles, Senior Environmental Planner Northern Virginia Regional Commission Debbie Spiliotopoulos, Senior Environmental Planner Northern Virginia Regional Commission Figure 1 Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail Corridor 1 http://www.novaregion.org/index.aspx?nid=299 The Northern Virginia Regional Commission 2015 Commissioners Listed by Jurisdiction (As of December 2015) Commissioners are appointed by and from the governing bodies of NVRC’s member localities on a population-based representation formula.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover the Potomac Gorge
    Discover the Potomac Gorge: A National Treasure n the outskirts of Washington, D.C., O the Potomac River passes through a landscape of surprising beauty and ecological significance. Here, over many millennia, an unusual combination of natural forces has produced a unique corridor known as the Potomac Gorge. This 15-mile river stretch is one of the country’s most biologically diverse areas, home to more than 1,400 plant species. Scientists have identified at least 30 distinct natural vegetation communities, several of which are globally rare and imperiled. The Gorge also supports a rich array of animal life, from rare invertebrates to the bald eagle and fish like the American shad. g g n n In total, the Potomac Gorge provides habitat to i i m m e e l l F F more than 200 rare plant species and natural . P P y y r r communities, making it one of the most important a a G G © © natural areas in the eastern United States. The heart of the Potomac Gorge is also known as Mather Gorge, named This riverside prairie at Great Falls, Virginia, results from periodic river flooding, after Stephen T. Mather, first director of the National Park Service. a natural disturbance that creates and sustains rare habitats. g g g n n n i i i e n m m m e r y e e e l l l a e l F F F P C . y e P P P e L y y y v f r r r r f a a a a e G G H G J © © © © © Flowering dogwood, a native forest understory species in our Specially adapted to withstand river The Potomac Gorge is home to Clinging precariously to the cliff’s edge, Brightly colored in its immature form, a reptile known as the region, is being decimated by an introduced fungal disease.
    [Show full text]
  • 46 Pola Negri in 1927
    Courtesy LofC, Prints & Photo Div, LC-DIG-ggbain-37938 Pola Negri in 1927 46 ARLINGTON HISTORICAL MAGAZINE Pola Negri Slept Here? Unraveling the Mystery of a Screen Siren's Stay in Arlington BY JENNIFER SALE CRANE With Arlington having few Hollywood connections to boast of, save For­ rest Tucker, Warren Beatty, Shirley MacLaine, and Sandra Bullock, the story about a modest stone bungalow nestled in the Gulf Branch stream valley off of Military Road is curious indeed. According to a long-held local legend, silent film star Pola Negri once stayed there. Local accounts have varied- some say the house was rented by Negri as her "Virginia hideaway," others think it was built as Negri and Rudolph Valen­ tino's love nest, and played host to Hollywood-style pool parties. The cozy bungalow at 3608 N. Military Road, 1 with quite a few additions and alterations, is now home to the Gulf Branch Nature Center, established in 1966 and operated by Arlington County Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources. The swimming pool, filled in and planted with a garden, can still be identified by the exposed segments of its curved concrete walls. The Nature Center's connection to the early Hollywood star was investi­ gated in the 1970s by ComeliaB. Rose, Jr., a founding member of the Arlington Historical Society. Rose's documentation leaves a few questions unanswered. But despite the lack of unequivocal primary source evidence, the story of Pola egri and the Gulf Branch Nature Center has become an important part of the oral tradition of Arlington County.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia
    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Management Plan Background…
    ARLINGTON COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE INVENTORY AND NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN BACKGROUND… PUBLIC SPACES MASTER PLAN (2005) “CREATE A NATURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY AND TO DEVELOP A MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION” • Bring together various plans & practices to protect the County’s natural resources. • Develop a classification system of the various types of natural resources. • Define lines of authority & responsibilities among various agencies. • Create an additional GIS Layer to identify significant natural resources. NATURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE INVENTORY: LAYING THE GROUNDWORK…2005-2008 ARLINGTON’S FIRST COMPREHENSIVE NATURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY…. Partnership development… PROJECT ELEMENTS: WATER RESOURCES GEOLOGY NATIVE FLORA TREE RESOURCES INVASIVE PLANTS URBAN WILDLIFE GIS WATER RESOURCES… SPRINGS AND SEEPS STREAM MAPPING WETLANDS CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS GEOLOGICAL FEATURES… SCENIC WATERFALLS OUTCROPS HIGH VALUE EXPOSURES HISTORIC QUARRIES NATIVE FLORA… LOCALLY-RARE PLANTS NATIVE FLORA STATE-RARE PLANTS SPECIMEN PREPARATION NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITIES & TREE RESOURCES… CHAMPION TREES SIGNIFICANT TREES FOREST TYPES PLANT COMMUNITIES INVASIVE PLANTS… 500 acres of parkland mapped… GOOSEBERRY FIVE-LEAVED AKEBIA ENGLISH IVY “Invasive plants represent the greatest current threat to the natural succession of local native forests in Arlington County” URBAN WILDLIFE: LEPIDOPTERA AVIFAUNA AMPHIBIANS ODONATA REPTILES MAMMALS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) … Mapping Examples: Native Plant Communities Donaldson Run Park
    [Show full text]
  • Mills and Mill Sites in Fairfax County, Virginia and Washington, Dc
    Grist Mills of Fairfax County and Washington, DC MILLS AND MILL SITES IN FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA AND WASHINGTON, DC Marjorie Lundegard Friends of Colvin Run Mill August 10, 2009 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Most of the research for this catalogue of mills of Fairfax County was obtained from the owners, staff members, or neighbors of these mills. I want to thank all these persons who helped in the assembling of the history of these mills. Resource information was also acquired from: the library at the National Park at Great Falls, Virginia; the book, COLVIN RUN MILL, by Ross D. Nether ton; brochures from the Fairfax County Park Authority; and from the staff and Friends of Peirce Mill in the District of Columbia. Significant information on the mill sites in Fairfax County was obtained from the Historic American Building Survey (HABS/HAER) reports that were made in 1936 and are available from the Library of Congress. I want to give special thanks to my husband, Robert Lundegard, who encouraged me to complete this survey. He also did the word processing to assemble the reports and pictures in book form. He designed the attractive cover page and many other features of the book. It is hoped that you will receive as much enjoyment from the reading of the booklet as I had in preparing it for publication. 0 Grist Mills of Fairfax County and Washington, DC Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 0 GRIST MILLS of FAIRFAX COUNTY and WASHINGTON, DC .............................................................
    [Show full text]