DOCSLIB.ORG

The Presbyterian Quarterly Author/Title Index, 1887 – 1904* Compiled by Wayne Sparkman, Director of the PCA Historical Center, St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Presbyterian Quarterly Author/Title Index, 1887 – 1904* Compiled by Wayne Sparkman, Director of the PCA Historical Center, St The Presbyterian Quarterly Author/Title Index, 1887 – 1904* Compiled by Wayne Sparkman, Director of the PCA Historical Center, St. Louis, MO. [*The July and October, 1903 issues were unavailable for inclusion in this index] Alexander, Henry Carrington [1835-1894] Optimism and Pessimism, 3.1 (January 1889) 17-28 and 3.2 (April 1889) 179-197. Side-Lights on the Correlation between Thoughts and Words, 8.3 (July 1894) 353-391. The Doctrine of Inspiration, 5.2 (April 1891) 190-208. The Doctrine of Inspiration as Affected by the Essential Relation Between Thought and Language, 7.2 (April 1893) 157-186. The General Doctrine of Inspiration, 4.1 (January 1890) 36-47. Alexander, Joseph H. [St. Charles, MO] Who Was Melchizedek?, 1.3 (January 1888) 454-476. Alexander, William Addison, D.D. [1857-1909] A Fifty Years’ Pastorate, 8.2 (April 1894) 276-284. Latter-Day Judaism, 11.4 (October 1897) 503-522. The Comings of Our Lord, 12.2 (April 1898) 187-214. The General Assembly – New Orleans – 1898, 12.4 (October 1898) 571-608. The Reunion of Christendom, 15.4 (October 1901) 487-499. Alexander, William McFadden [1861-1944] Professor Johnson’s History of the Southern Presbyterian Church, 8.4.598-607. The Southern General Assembly, 1897, 11.3 (July 1897) 382-398. Anderson, Neal Larkin [1865-1931] The Montgomery Conference on Race Problems at the South, 14.4 (October 1900) 565-573. The Recoil of Evolution’s Assault Upon Teleology – A Review of the “Argument to Design,” 13.2 (April 1899) 268- 280. Anderson, Robert Campbell, Jr. [1864-1955] Calming Life’s Storms [Homiletic Note on Jonah 1:12], 17.3 (January 1904) 424-426. Anderson, William Madison [1862-1924] Some Hints on Pastoral Visiting, 16.1 (July 1902) 100-103. Anonymous An Episode in Immersionist History, 10.3 (July 1896) 387-390. Home Missions in Our Seminaries, 10.1 (January 1896) 98-101. Mormonism and Citizenship, 17.3 (January 1904) 415-417. Our Book of Praise, 10.1 (January 1896) 101-102. Prayer Meetings, 3.2 (April 1889) 261-267, by “A Vieuzx” Thanksgiving for Reverses [Homiletic Note on Romans 5:3], 17.3 (January 1904) 422-424. The Cumberland General Assembly, 6.3 (July 1892) 447-448. The Federal Synod of the Reformed Churches, 5.3 (July 1891) 448-451. The Life and Theology of Jonathan Edwards, 15.2 (April 1901) 222-237. The Northern General Assembly, 5.3 (July 1891) 430-448. The Northern General Assembly, 6.3 (July 1892) 439-447. The Northern General Assembly – Winona – 1898, 12.4 (October 1898) 609-617. The Proposed Union of Churches, 17.4 (April 1904) 568-572. The University Consolidation Movement, 17.4 (April 1904) 564-568. 2 Armstrong, George D. [1813-1899] Creation as a Doctrine of Science, 1.1 (July 1887) 106-128. Darwin and Darwinism, 3.3 (July 1889) 334-351. Providence as a Doctrine of Science, 7.2 (April 1893) 206-222. Scientific Study of Prayer, 6.2 (April 1892) 227-245. The Deluge, 5.2 (April 1891) 209-228. The Pentateuchal Story of Creation, 2.3 (October 1888) 345-368. The Word of God vs. “The Bible of Modern Scientific Theology,” 2.1 (April 1888) 39-58. Armstrong, James D. Organic Union: The Property Question, 3.1 (January 1889) 86-106. Baird, Samuel John, D.D. [1817-1893] The Fatherhood of God, 5.3 (July 1891) 350-362. The Origin of the Visible Church, 6.2 (April 1892) 264-270. Barbour, Lewis Green, D.D. [1829-1907] Anselm, 9.3 (July 1895) 397-425. Macbeth and the Bible, 14.1 (January 1900) 102-115. Puzzling Questions, 15.4 (October 1901) 558-570. St. John’s Argument from Miracles, 5.1 (January 1891) 1-32. The Dualism of Truth, 17.3 (January 1904) 325-338 The General Assembly of 1888 [Southern], 2.2 (July 1888) 286-306. [see also Barbour’s note of correction in 2.3 (October 1888) 480. Barksdale, Thomas E. Exclusion of the Bible from the Public Schools, 2.2 (July 1888) 313-315. Barret, Thomas Carr [1841-1916] The Office of Ruling Elder, 10.1 (January 1896) 63-72. Baskette, G.H. [Nashville, Tenn.] Presbyterian Loyalty, 10.1 (January 1896) 91-93. Beall, Benjamin Leander [1827-1913] Voluntary and Missionary Societies, 4.1 (January 1890) 56-73. Bean, William Smith [1849-1920] A Plea for Biblical Theology, 3.4 (October 1889)598-605. Body, Soul and Spirit, 13.2 (April 1899) 244-252. George Eliot, 7.2 (April 1893) 242-249. Beattie, Francis Robert, Ph.D., D.D. [1848-1906] Christian Apologetics, 4.3 (July 1890) 337-369. General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in Canada, 7.4 (October 1893) 607-611. Genesis of the Westminster Assembly, 13.2 (April 1899) 189-205. Primeval Man, 9.3 (July 1895) 351-371. Some Salient Features of Presbyterian Doctrine, 13.4 (October 1899) 653-684. The Egyptian Book of the Dead, 16.1 (July 1902) 30-44. The Inauguration of Dr. Briggs, 5.2 (April 1891) 270-283. The Place and Use of the Bible in the Public Schools of the United States, 17.4 (April 1904) 512-537. The Toronto Council of the Alliance of the Reformed Churches Holding the Presbyterian System, 7.1 (January 1893) 108-120. Beauchamp, J.H. [Lexington, Ky.] The Communion Wine Question, 7.1 (January 1893) 102-108. Author – Title Index to The Presbyterian Quarterly, 1887 – 1904. © PCA Historical Center, 2003. All Rights Reserved. 3 Benn, Robert Lee, D.D. [1868-1939] Doctrine and Life, 16.2 (October 1902) 218-224. Bishop, George F., D.D. [Orange, N.J.] The Creed-Principle in Religion, 15.1 (January 1901) 64-75. Bishop, William Frost [1853-1913] “In” versus “Into”, 8.3 (July 1894) 434-439. “In the Name of God, Amen,” 13.2 (April 1899) 339-344. Bissell, Edwin Cone Illogical Methods in Biblical Criticism, 7.4 (October 1893) 485-504. Bitzer, George Leese [1860-1934] Prof. Johnson’s “The New Testament Law for the Church’s Effort at Propagandism,” 9.4 (October 1895) 607-612. Blackburn, George Andrew [1861-1918] The Tithe System – Its Practical Working, 4.2 (April 1890) 295-300. Blakeslee, Erastus [21 Bromfield Street, Boston, Mass.] The Bible Study Union Lessons, 11.4 (October 1897) 538-549. Bowen, Edwin W. [Ashland, Va.] Lanier as Poet, 13.3 (July 1899) 414-426. Brantly, Erskine [1850-1936] Young People’s Societies and Our Church, 9.3 (July 1895) 426-447. Bristol, Frank M. [Metropolitan M.E. Church, Washington, D.C.] Dante, the Poet, the Politician, the Protestant, 16.1 (July 1902) 68-76. Bryan, William Swan Plumer [1856-1925] Some Recent Contributions to the Philosophy of Religion, 10.2 (April 1896) 157-170. The General Presbyterian Council, 6.1 (January 1892) 118-132. The Proposed Revision of the Standards of Westminster, 3.4 (October 1889) 589-598. The Trial of Professor Smith, 7.2 (April 1893) 250-298. Bryson, John Henry, D.D. [1831-1897] The Scotch-Irish and Their Influence, 5.3 (July 1891) 380-407. Caldwell, Charles Turner [1865-1965] The Immutability of God [Homiletic Note on Malachi 3:6], 16.2 (October 1902) 263-264. Caldwell, John Williamson, Jr. [1872-1946] The Baptism of Christ, 17.3 (January 1904) 384-390. Campbell, William Addison, D.D. [1829 – 1896] Peace Conference, 6.2 (April 1892) 281-284. The Power of the People in the Government of the Church, 8.3 (July 1894) 404-415. Cannon, J.F., D.D. [1851-1920] A Point of Comparison Between the Old Theology and the New, 14.2 (April 1900) 224-233. Babel and Its Lessons, 10.2 (April 1896) 131-137. Evangelism, Again, 2.3 (October 1888) 462-465. “The Mind of the Master,” by Ian Maclaren, 11.2 (April 1897) 190-200. Author – Title Index to The Presbyterian Quarterly, 1887 – 1904. © PCA Historical Center, 2003. All Rights Reserved. 4 Carr, Archibald Fairley [1868-1958] Theology of the Future, 14.2 (April 1900) 165-172. Carter, John Pym, D.D. [Washington, D.C.] Inspiration of the Scriptures, 5.4 (October 1891) 525-535. Caven, William, D.D., LL.D. [Toronto, Canada] The Jesuits in Canada, 4.3 (July 1890) 443-448. The Teaching of the Theological Class-Room in Relation to the Spiritual Life of the Student, 14.1 (January 1900) 1-16. Cecil, Russell [1853-1925] Love Like the Sun [Homiletic Note on Judges 5:31], 16.2 (October 1902) 251-256. The General Assembly [Southern] of 1902, 16.2 (October 1902) 225-239. Chaney, James McDonald, D.D. [1831-1909] The Woman Question, 17.3 (January 1904) 391-403. Clark, William Crawford [1849-1927] Church and State, 14.1 (January 1900) 116-117. Paradise, 15.4 (October 1901) 585-589. Presbytery vs. Episcopacy, 1.3 (January 1888) 491-506. Rationalism in the Treatment of the Bible, 14.1 (January 1900) 118-119. The Claims of the Home Mission Work on Our Young Ministers, 10.2 (April 1896) 236-240. The Endowment of Colleges for Women, 15.1 (January 1901) 137-142. Cox, William M. [Baldwyn, Miss.] The Social and Civil State of Woman, 9.4 (October 1895) 584-606. Crawford, Clarence K., D.D. The Inspiration of the Old Testament, 17.3 (January 1904) 370-383. Currell, W.S., Ph.D. [Davidson College, N.C.] Robert Browning, 6.1 (January 1892) 101-112. Robert Browning, The Poet, 6.3 (July 1892) 410-421. Shakspere—Bacon Redivivus, 3.1 (January 1889) 118-130. Curry, Albert Bruce [1852-1939] Civil Government [Homiletic Note on Romans 13:1], 17.4 (April 1904) 580-587. The Centennial Celebration in Philadelphia, 2.2 (July 1888) 309-313.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fall 2012 Florida State Law Magazine
    FLORIDA STATE LAW Inside Our First Seminole Chief Justice Annual Report Alumni Recognitions ALUMNI MAGAZINE FALL 2012 Message from the Dean Jobs, Alumni, Students and Admissions Players in the Jobs Market Admissions and Rankings This summer, the Wall Street The national press has highlighted the related phenomena Journal reported that we are the of the tight legal job market and rising student indebtedness. nation’s 25th best law school when it More prospective applicants are asking if a law degree is worth comes to placing our new graduates the cost, and law school applications are down significantly. in jobs that require law degrees. Just Ours have fallen by approximately 30% over the past two years. this month, Law School Transparency Moreover, our “yield” rate has gone down, meaning that fewer ranked us the nation’s 26th best law students are accepting our offers of admission. Our research school in terms of overall placement makes clear: prime competitor schools can offer far more score, and Florida’s best. Our web generous scholarship packages. To attract the top students, page includes more detailed information on our placement we must limit our enrollment and increase scholarship awards. outcomes. In short, we rank very high nationally in terms We are working with our university administration to limit of the number of students successfully placed. Although our our enrollment, which of course has financial implications average starting salary of $58,650 is less than those at the na- both for the law school and for the central university. It is tion’s most elite private law schools, so is our average student also imperative to increase our endowment in a way that will indebtedness, which is $73,113.
    [Show full text]
  • Reform of the Elected Judiciary in Boss Tweed’S New York
    File: 3 Lerner - Corrected from Soft Proofs.doc Created on: 10/1/2007 11:25:00 PM Last Printed: 10/7/2007 6:34:00 PM 2007] 109 FROM POPULAR CONTROL TO INDEPENDENCE: REFORM OF THE ELECTED JUDICIARY IN BOSS TWEED’S NEW YORK Renée Lettow Lerner* INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................... 111 I. THE CONSTITUTION OF 1846: POPULAR CONTROL...................... 114 II. “THE THREAT OF HOPELESS BARBARISM”: PROBLEMS WITH THE NEW YORK JUDICIARY AND LEGAL SYSTEM AFTER THE CIVIL WAR .................................................. 116 A. Judicial Elections............................................................ 118 B. Abuse of Injunctive Powers............................................. 122 C. Patronage Problems: Referees and Receivers................ 123 D. Abuse of Criminal Justice ............................................... 126 III. THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1867-68: JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE............................................................. 130 A. Participation of the Bar at the Convention..................... 131 B. Natural Law Theories: The Law as an Apolitical Science ................................... 133 C. Backlash Against the Populist Constitution of 1846....... 134 D. Desire to Lengthen Judicial Tenure................................ 138 E. Ratification of the Judiciary Article................................ 143 IV. THE BAR’S REFORM EFFORTS AFTER THE CONVENTION ............ 144 A. Railroad Scandals and the Times’ Crusade.................... 144 B. Founding
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 74 Issue 3 April 2021 Article 5 4-2021 Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Christian R. Burset, Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority, 74 Vanderbilt Law Review 621 (2021) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol74/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset* The prohibition against advisory opinions is fundamental to our understanding of federal judicial power, but we have misunderstood its origins. Discussions of the doctrine begin not with a constitutional text or even a court case, but a letter in which the Jay Court rejected President Washington’s request for legal advice. Courts and scholars have offered a variety of explanations for the Jay Court’s behavior. But they all depict the earliest Justices as responding to uniquely American concerns about advisory opinions. This Article offers a different explanation. Drawing on previously untapped archival sources, it shows that judges throughout the anglophone world—not only in the United States but also in England and British India— became opposed to advisory opinions in the second half of the eighteenth century. The death of advisory opinions was a global phenomenon, rooted in a period of anxiety about common-law authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Attainder
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Winter 2016 Bills of Attainder Matthew Steilen University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Steilen, Bills of Attainder, 53 Hous. L. Rev. 767 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/123 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE BILLS OF ATTAINDER Matthew Steilen* ABSTRACT What are bills of attainder? The traditional view is that bills of attainder are legislation that punishes an individual without judicial process. The Bill of Attainder Clause in Article I, Section 9 prohibits the Congress from passing such bills. But what about the President? The traditional view would seem to rule out application of the Clause to the President (acting without Congress) and to executive agencies, since neither passes bills. This Article aims to bring historical evidence to bear on the question of the scope of the Bill of Attainder Clause. The argument of the Article is that bills of attainder are best understood as a summary form of legal process, rather than a legislative act. This argument is based on a detailed historical reconstruction of English and early American practices, beginning with a study of the medieval Parliament rolls, year books, and other late medieval English texts, and early modern parliamentary diaries and journals covering the attainders of Elizabeth Barton under Henry VIII and Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, under Charles I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Providence Island Company on 28Th September 1629 Letters Of
    The Providence Island Company On 28th September 1629 letters of marque were issued for an expedition to be mounted to St Catalina, an island in the Caribbean (later to be renamed Providence Island). Subscriptions were invited from Lord Saye's circle of powerful political and business friends, who were opposed to the arbitrary rule of the king, for twenty shares at £200 per head. In the summer of 1630 the first meeting of shareholders was held in Brooke House, Holborn, London (held there to avoid the plague in the country). On 4th December a patent was sealed granting the formal incorporation of the splendidly named company of 'The Governor and Company of Adventurers of the City of Westminster for the Plantation of the Islands of Providence, Henrietta and adjacent islands laying upon the coast of America'; known as 'The Providence Island Company'. The total cost of the Patent and fees was £60. The name Providence had great significance at that time; the Adventurers (men who advanced venture capital) believed they were responding to divine will in founding the settlement. They were casting themselves on God's providence. The project could only succeed with God's approval.4 St Catalina, as the Spanish called the island, was situated in the south-west corner of the Caribbean, off the coast of Nicaragua; it is six miles long by four wide and was considered, in the seventeenth century, to be the choicest of the Caribbean islands. It had an equable climate, was fertile and salubrious; with plenty of water. It was easily fortified and there were no venomous creatures.
    [Show full text]
  • I the Committee of Safety
    .· (~. ll II Ii ) ' THE COMMITTEE OF SAFETY. 11 "A thesis submitted to the ,, faculty of the Graduate School of the University of • Minnesota by Etheleen Frances ;emp in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ii degree of Master of Arts, May 5, 1911. 1;1 I Ii II Ii 11 ' :S I:BLI OGRAPHY. l. Source Material 1. Journals of the House of Lords, vol. V and VI. Journals of the House of Commons, vol. II and III. These contain the greater portion of the material on the Committee of Safety. 2. Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts. London, 1874 etc. These volumes contain here and there a com­ munication to or from the Committee of Safety but have much less material that might be expected. References found:- 4th Report p 262. 5th Report pp. 48, 54, 56, 63, 65, 69, 80, 107, 114. 7th Report pp. 550-588. 10th Report App. 6 pp. 87-88. 13th Report App. 1 p. 104. 3. Calendar of State Papers. Domestic 1641-1644 London, 1887-8 lla.ny order for military supplies are given in the State Papers but not in full. 4. Rushworth,John, Historical collections, 8 vol. London, 1682-1701. Compilation of declarations and proclamations. Vol. 3 and 7 contain material on the Committee. They contain valuable proclamations of the King which cannot be found elsewhere. 5. Somers, Lord. Tracts, 13 vol. London, 1809-1815. Has several remonstrances of value. ){) 1 ~ ( ' ,.... 6. Whitacre. Diary Add. M S S 31, 116, fol. Had notes from first six months of the Committee period especially.
    [Show full text]
  • The Surprising History of the Preponderance Standard of Civil Proof, 67 Fla
    Florida Law Review Volume 67 | Issue 5 Article 2 March 2016 The urS prising History of the Preponderance Standard of Civil Proof John Leubsdorf Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Evidence Commons Recommended Citation John Leubsdorf, The Surprising History of the Preponderance Standard of Civil Proof, 67 Fla. L. Rev. 1569 (2016). Available at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol67/iss5/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Law Review by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Leubsdorf: The Surprising History of the Preponderance Standard of Civil Pro THE SURPRISING HISTORY OF THE PREPONDERANCE STANDARD OF CIVIL PROOF John Leubsdorf * Abstract Although much has been written on the history of the requirement of proof of crimes beyond a reasonable doubt, this is the first study to probe the history of its civil counterpart, proof by a preponderance of the evidence. It turns out that the criminal standard did not diverge from a preexisting civil standard, but vice versa. Only in the late eighteenth century, after lawyers and judges began speaking of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, did references to the preponderance standard begin to appear. Moreover, U.S. judges did not start to instruct juries about the preponderance standard until the mid-nineteenth century, and English judges not until after that. The article explores these developments and their causes with the help of published trial transcripts and newspaper reports that have only recently become accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION This volume publishes the papers and correspondence of the Hotham family during the civil wars and interregnum. The head of the family and first baronet, Sir John Hotham, is well known in the national narrative because of his critical role in denying the king entry to Hull on 23 April 1642. This episode ignited much contemporary controversy, raising the stakes in a pamphlet war between the king and his parliamentary opponents, and making armed conflict far more likely. It has attracted considerable attention from constitutional historians who have debated its legal ramifications, while political and military historians have recognized that the king’s failure to seize the large arms magazine at Hull badly undermined the royalist war effort. Yet, despite their national importance in 1642, the Hotham family’s papers have only rarely been utilized by academics. Late twentieth-century historians such as J.T. Cliffe, Barbara English, and Peter Roebuck drew upon the collection to inform their work on the wider theme of Yorkshire gentry landowners,1 but few others have been to Hull to access the archive. This also reflects a relative neglect of northern England in civil war historiography. There has been no biography of either of the Hothams, and their most recent family histories date from as long ago as the First World War. 2 This is unfortunate, because Sir John Hotham and his eldest son were extremely colourful and enigmatic figures, whose letters reveal much about the cultural attitudes of the English gentry in the 1640s. This volume seeks to redress this imbalance and restore the centrality of the Hotham family to the parliamentary cause.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BROUGHTON PLOTTERS, (The Providence !Island Company and Saybrook)
    BUSINESS AND TREASON: THE BROUGHTON PLOTTERS, (The Providence !Island Company and Saybrook) Nicholas J. Allen My deare wife, I am verylye persuaded God will bring some heavye affliction upon this lande, and that speedylye ... if the Lord seeth it will be good for us, he will provide shelter and a hiding place for us and others. ' John Winthrop, Governor of Saybrook, 1635 (in a letter to his wife dated 1629). Introduction Visitors to Broughton Castle, after viewing the rooms used by generations of the Fiennes family for living and socialising, make their way to, or if guided are shewn, the Council Chamber which is at the back and very top of the house. There they will very likely be told, or read in the guide book, that this room is where William Fiennes, eighth Lord Saye and Sele, his son Nathaniel and a group of like-minded men such as Lord Brooke, John Hampden, John Pym, Oliver St John, Lord Warwick and Sir Harry Vane planned their opposition to King Charles' government. The visitor will, very likely, be also told that they used a business venture in the Caribbean, namely the Providence Island Company, as a cover for these political meetings. So why did a group of powerful peers, landed gentry, politicians and businessmen meet, over what seems to be many years, plotting some form of opposition to the King's government — an exceedingly dangerous pastime. The number of men involved and the many meeting places used must have created some major problems of security, and not necessarily stemming from just the participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabbath-Recreations-CPJ51.Pdf
    5 The Confessional Presbyterian 2009 A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice Table of Contents 2. Editorial Articles 3. The Westminster Assembly & the Judicial Law: A Chronological Compilation and Analysis. Part One: Chronology By Chris Coldwell 56. The Westminster Assembly & the Judicial Law: A Chronological Compilation and Analysis. Part Two: Analysis By Matthew Winzer 89. John Calvin on the Doctrine of Divine Revelation By W. Gary Crampton. Th.D. 115. Samuel Rutherford’s Contribution to Covenant Theology in Scotland By D. Patrick Ramsey 127. Presbyterian Quintessence: The Five ‘Heads’ of Church Government By Frank J. Smith, Ph.D., D.D. 161. Johannes Megapolensis: Pioneer Reformed Missionary to the Mohawks By Wes Bredenhof 170. An Answer to the Challenge of Preaching the Old Testament: An Historical & Theological Examination of the Redemptive-Historical Approach By Rev. Anthony T. Selvaggio, J.D., M. Div. 185. The Deacon: A Divine Right Office with Divine Uses By C. N. Willborn 199. Francis Turretin and Barthianism: The Covenant of Works in Historical Perspective By James J. Cassidy 214. Pictures of Jesus and the Sovereignty of Divine Revelation: Recent Literature and a Defense of the Confessional Reformed View By David VanDrunen 229. The Sabbath Day and Recreations on the Sabbath: An Examination of the Sabbath and the Biblical Basis for the “No Recreation” Clause in Westminster Confession of Faith 21.8 and Westminster Larger Catechism 117 By Lane Keister 239. “So Great a Love”—James Durham on Christ and His Church in the Song of Solomon By Donald John MacLean The Confessional Presbyteri an, P. O.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln University Herald
    jt Lincoln University Herald. ~ 0 VOL.XIX. LINCOLNUNIVERSIW, PA., DECEMBER,I~I+JANUARY, 1915. No. I. d - Before going to Philadelphia, Dr. Boulden was pastor of churches in West Chester, Pa. ; r in Newark and Milton, Del. e In a private letter, he says: “My success has L, been due to my training in Lincoln University, and I have red,edicated my life to the church of my choice, the Union American M. E., and to my people.’’ -- New Buildings Needed. 1 To meet the demands of the finies and the > growth in numbers of the student body, two additional buildings are greatly needed on the c campus. A Science EIall, with modern equip- f ment, is needed to meet the needs of the Y growing number of students in this depart- V ment and the increased requirements of the 1 medical schools. The present development of the Scientific Department makes the present 1 facilities entirely inadequate. A combined Y. M. C. A. Building and t .Gymnasium has long been needed to supply r a centre for the social and religious activities t of the students, and to provide the means for , healthful exercise and physical recreation, t especially during the winter months. Lincoln , University looks to her generous friends to S Bishop P. A: Boulden, D. D. s~~pplythese needs and to provide the means 1 for further expansion and usefulness. Speaking of the recent election of Rev. P. , A. Boulden, D. D., to the Bishopric of the -- Union American M. E. Church, a Philadclphia Campus Items. paper says: “Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Law Judicial Office, Sovereignty, and the Church Of
    1 Common Law Judicial Office, Sovereignty, and the Church of England in Restoration England, 1660-1688 David Kearns Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of Sydney A thesis submitted to fulfil requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2019 2 This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. David Kearns 29/06/2019 3 Authorship Attribution Statement This thesis contains material published in David Kearns, ‘Sovereignty and Common Law Judicial Office in Taylor’s Case (1675)’, Law and History Review, 37:2 (2019), 397-429, and material to be published in David Kearns and Ryan Walter, ‘Office, Political Theory, and the Political Theorist’, The Historical Journal (forthcoming). The research for these articles was undertaken as part of the research for this thesis. I am the sole author of the first article and sole author of section I of the co-authored article, and it is the research underpinning section I that appears in the thesis. David Kearns 29/06/2019 As supervisor for the candidature upon which this thesis is based, I can confirm that the authorship attribution statements above are correct. Andrew Fitzmaurice 29/06/2019 4 Acknowledgements Many debts have been incurred in the writing of this thesis, and these acknowledgements must necessarily be a poor repayment for the assistance that has made it possible.
    [Show full text]