Alger Hiss at Yalta a Reassessment of Hiss’S Arguments Against Including Any of the Soviet Republics As Initial UN Members

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alger Hiss at Yalta a Reassessment of Hiss’S Arguments Against Including Any of the Soviet Republics As Initial UN Members Alger Hiss at Yalta A Reassessment of Hiss’s Arguments against Including Any of the Soviet Republics as Initial UN Members ✣ Henry D. Fetter The decades-long controversy over whether State Department official Alger Hiss was a Soviet agent, and the nature and extent of his activities if he was, has largely been fought with documents—“immutable evidences,” as U.S. At- torney Thomas F. Murphy labeled them in his summation at the close of Hiss’s second trial for perjury—from the “Pumpkin Papers” at the contro- versy’s initiation to the Venona decryptions of Soviet intelligence documents that clinched the case for Hiss’s guilt in the eyes of most historians.1 Amid that flood of documentation, one item continues to hold an intriguing place in the debate, a short memorandum Hiss prepared during the Yalta conference entitled “Arguments against Inclusion of Any of the Soviet Republics among the Initial Members [of the United Nations]” (hereinafter referred to as the Hiss Memorandum).2 Hiss, at the request of Secretary of State Edward R. Stettinius, Jr., was participating in his capacity as acting director of the State Department Office of Special Political Affairs. His remit was to lend his ex- pertise to the conference’s deliberations on the proposed postwar international organization, about which key questions of structure and operation remained unresolved. 1. U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, “United States v. Alger Hiss,” Transcript of Record (hereinafter cited as “Hiss Transcript”), pp. 4672–4673. That the controversy continues, how- ever, is attested by a recent argument for Hiss’s innocence. Joan Brady, Alger Hiss Framed: A New Look at the Case That Made Nixon Famous (New York: Arcade Publishing, 2016). For Hiss’s guilt, see Har- vey Klehr, “The Agony of Alger,” The New Criterion, Vol. 36, No. 1 (September 2017), pp. 64–68 (reviewing Brady’s book). 2. United States Delegation Memorandum, Attachment 1, “Arguments against Inclusion of Any of the Soviet Republics among the Initial Members,” in U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States: The Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945 (hereinafter referred to as FRUS, Malta and Yalta), pp. 746–747. In a footnote to the memorandum, the editors of the volume state, “author not indicated but presumably Hiss” (p. 746 n. 2). When the volume was published in 1955, Hiss confirmed that he was the author. “Hiss Identifies Yalta Notation,” The New York Times,17March 1955, p. 79. Journal of Cold War Studies Vol. 22, No. 1, Winter 2020, pp. 46–88, https://doi.org/10.1162/jcws_a_00925 © 2020 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 46 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/jcws_a_00925 by guest on 30 September 2021 Alger Hiss at Yalta As the composition of the U.S. delegation to the upcoming Big Three conference at Yalta was being determined in late December 1944 and early January 1945, Stettinius suggested to President Franklin D. Roosevelt that “we might want someone who had been a keener student” than Stettinius himself “of the technical angles of the international organization.” Hiss, who had served as secretary of the Dumbarton Oaks “conversations” among the United States, the Soviet Union, Great Britain, and China on that subject in the summer of 1944, was designated to fill the role.3 Hiss later described his activities at Yalta: I was primarily responsible for the United Nations topics which were rather nu- merous and of considerable importance. The most important objective was to obtain agreement on voting procedure in the Security Council. Other topics were fixing the date and place of the United Nations Conference and deter- mining the governments to be invited. The determination of nations to be invited was of particular importance to us as we wanted all of the Latin Ameri- can countries to be invited; the Russians on the other hand wanted only nations actually at war with the Axis.”4 The subject matter of the Hiss Memorandum lies squarely within the range of issues on which Stettinius had expressed the need for the assistance that Hiss was assigned to provide. The memorandum is dated 8 February 1945, the day after the fourth Yalta conference plenary session, during which Soviet Foreign Minister Vy- acheslav Molotov had demanded membership in the contemplated postwar international organization for “three or at least two of the Soviet Republics as original members” (specifically, the Ukrainian, Belorussian, and Lithua- nian republics).5 The memorandum has been characterized by, among many others, Roosevelt’s Yalta interpreter Charles E. Bohlen as a “closely reasoned argument against admitting the Soviet republics.”6 3. Edward R. Stettinius, Jr., Calendar Notes, 30 December 1944, in Box 243, Edward Reilly Stettinius Jr. Papers, 1918–1949, Accession MSS 2723, Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library, Charlottesville, Virginia (hereinafter referred to as “Stettinius Papers”); and Edward R. Stettinius, Jr., Summary of Conversation, 1 January 1945, in Box 236, “Telephone Summaries and Transcripts 1–6 January 1945 (Hyde file, Telephone Summaries etc.),” Stettinius Papers. 4. Alger Hiss, “Memorandum of Duties in the Department of State 1944 until January 15, 1947” [prepared for his lawyers], ca. September 1948, cited in Allen Weinstein, Perjury: The Hiss–Chambers Case, rev. ed. (New York: Random House, 1997), p. 313. All references to Weinstein’s Perjury are to the revised (1997) edition. 5. Charles E. Bohlen, Minutes of Fourth Plenary Session, 7 February 1945, in FRUS, Malta and Yalta, p. 712. 6. Charles E. Bohlen, Witness to History 1929–1969 (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1973), p. 194. 47 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/jcws_a_00925 by guest on 30 September 2021 Fetter My aim in this article is not to assess the nature and extent of Hiss’s role at Yalta or the claims that have been made by former Soviet intelligence officers that Hiss undermined U.S. interests by disclosing confidential information about U.S. positions and objectives to Soviet officials during the conference.7 My goal here is more limited: to explore whether the memorandum is evi- dence that Hiss was not a Soviet agent (at least at the time of the conference) or whether it is no more than a “puzzling anomaly,” as one proponent of Hiss’s guilt has characterized it.8 The exploration involves consideration of the emer- gence of the Soviet republics issue at the Dumbarton Oaks “conversations” in August- September 1944, along with U.S. State Department and presidential preparations for Yalta, the decision to include Hiss in the U.S. delegation at Yalta, and the way the deliberations on—and resolution of—that issue at Yalta became entangled with issues concerning voting procedure in the UN Secu- rity Council (the veto question) and the right of countries, principally in Latin America, to become founding members of the UN despite their failure to have embraced the United Nations Declaration prior to the Yalta conference. The article then analyzes the text of the memorandum more closely than it has been examined before and considers whether the circumstances of its preparation, as well as its contents, are consistent with the evidence that Hiss was still a Soviet agent at the time of the Yalta conference.9 When the mem- orandum was released to the public in 1955 as part of the overall collection of Yalta papers, Hiss claimed that it expressed both “his personal convictions” and the official policy of the State Department.10 My analysis here does not contend, as some have alleged, that Hiss was responsible for the U.S. decision to support initial UN membership for the Ukrainian and Byelorussian Soviet Republics. However, it does consider the extent to which arguments put forth in the memorandum diverged from the position of the State Department and thereby raise the possibility that Hiss took advantage of the opportunity he enjoyed as a trusted and expert adviser to promotee a case that was at odds with U.S. interests. 7. As noted (but discounted) in S. M. Plokhy, Yalta: The Price of Peace (New York: Viking, 2010), p. 357. 8. Christina Shelton, Alger Hiss: Why He Chose Treason (New York: Threshold Editions, 2012), p. 149. 9. For Hiss’s alleged espionage activities on behalf of the Soviet Union at the time of Yalta, see John Earl Haynes, Harvey Klehr, and Alexander Vassiliev, Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), pp. 18–27; Allen Weinstein and Alexander Vassiliev, The Haunted Wood (New York: Random House, 1999), pp. 267–269; and Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, The Sword and the Shield (New York: Basic Books, 2001), pp. 132–134. 10. “Hiss Confirms His Yalta Memo,” NewYorkHeraldTribune, 18 March 1955, p. 6; and “Hiss Identifies Yalta Notation,” p. 79. 48 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/jcws_a_00925 by guest on 30 September 2021 Alger Hiss at Yalta The Hiss Memorandum in the Hiss Debate The question of the admission of several Soviet republics, in addition to the Soviet Union itself, to “initial membership” in the UN has played so long a part in the Hiss controversy that it may even be said to belong to the “prehis- tory” of the Hiss case. As early as July 1945, American Affairs, a journal with a limited circulation, published an article by Isaac Don Levine, a confidant of Whittaker Chambers, claiming that, during the Yalta conference, Premier Stalin found an occasion, at the termination of a session, to chat with President Roosevelt when all the other American delegates, with the exception of one had left the room.
Recommended publications
  • The American Experience with Diplomacy and Military Restraint I
    PART I: THE AmERICAN EXPERIENCE WITH DIPLOMACY AND MILITARY RESTRAINT i. Orphaned Diplomats: The American Struggle to Match Diplomacy with Power Jeremi Suri E. Gordon Fox Professor of History and Director, European Union Center of Excellence, University of Wisconsin, Madison Benjamin Franklin spent the American Revolution in Paris. He had helped to draft the Declaration of Independence in the summer of 1776, one of the most radical documents of the eighteenth century—sparking rebellion on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Serving as a representative for the Continental Congress in France during the next decade, Franklin became a celebrity. He was the enlightened idealist from the frontier, the man of principled action who enthralled onlookers in the rigid European class societies of the 1770s and ’80s. Franklin embodied the American critique of Old World society, economy, and diplomacy. He was one of many American revolutionaries to take aim at the degenerate world of powdered wigs, fancy uniforms, and silver-service dinners where the great men of Europe decided the fate of distant societies. Franklin was a representative of the enduring American urge to replace the diplomacy of aristocrats with the openness and freedom of democrats.1 Despite his radical criticisms of aristocracy, Franklin was also a prominent participant in Parisian salons. To the consternation of John Adams and John Jay, he dined most evenings with the most conservative elements of French high society. Unlike Adams, he did not refuse to dress the part. For all his frontiers- man claims, Franklin relished high-society silver-service meals, especially if generous portions of wine were available for the guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean G. Acheson Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 4/27/1964 Administrative Information
    Dean G. Acheson Oral History Interview – JFK #1, 4/27/1964 Administrative Information Creator: Dean G(ooderham) Acheson Interviewer: Lucius D. Battle Date of Interview: April 27, 1964 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 34 pp. Biographical Note Acheson, Secretary of State under President Harry S. Truman, talks about foreign policy matters during the John F. Kennedy administration and his advice and activities during that time. He also reads the text of several letters he wrote to JFK. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed February 15, 1965, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form. Direct your questions concerning copyright to the reference staff. Transcript of Oral History Interview These electronic documents were created from transcripts available in the research room of the John F.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo Article Roundtable Review, Vol. X, No. 24
    2009 h-diplo H-Diplo Article Roundtable Roundtable Editors: Thomas Maddux and Diane Labrosse Roundtable Web Editor: George Fujii Review Introduction by Thomas Maddux www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables Reviewers: Bruce Craig, Ronald Radosh, Katherine A.S. Volume X, No. 24 (2009) Sibley, G. Edward White 17 July 2009 Response by John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr Journal of Cold War Studies 11.3 (Summer 2009) Special Issue: Soviet Espoinage in the United States during the Stalin Era (with articles by John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr; Eduard Mark; Gregg Herken; Steven T. Usdin; Max Holland; and John F. Fox, Jr.) http://www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/jcws/11/3 Stable URL: http://www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables/PDF/Roundtable-X-24.pdf Contents Introduction by Thomas Maddux, California State University, Northridge.............................. 2 Review by Bruce Craig, University of Prince Edward Island ..................................................... 8 Review by Ronald Radosh, Emeritus, City University of New York ........................................ 16 Review by Katherine A.S. Sibley, St. Josephs University ......................................................... 18 Review by G. Edward White, University of Virginia School of Law ........................................ 23 Author’s Response by John Earl Haynes, Library of Congress, and Harvey Klehr, Emory University ................................................................................................................................ 27 Copyright © 2009 H-Net: Humanities and Social Sciences Online. H-Net permits the redistribution and reprinting of this work for non-profit, educational purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author(s), web location, date of publication, H-Diplo, and H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online. For other uses, contact the H-Diplo editorial staff at [email protected]. H-Diplo Roundtable Reviews, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • In a Rather Emotional State?' the Labour Party and British Intervention in Greece, 1944-5
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE 'In a rather emotional state?' The Labour party and British intervention in Greece, 1944-5 AUTHORS Thorpe, Andrew JOURNAL The English Historical Review DEPOSITED IN ORE 12 February 2008 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10036/18097 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication 1 ‘IN A RATHER EMOTIONAL STATE’? THE LABOUR PARTY AND BRITISH INTERVENTION IN GREECE, 1944-45* Professor Andrew Thorpe Department of History University of Exeter Exeter EX4 4RJ Tel: 01392-264396 Fax: 01392-263305 Email: [email protected] 2 ‘IN A RATHER EMOTIONAL STATE’? THE LABOUR PARTY AND BRITISH INTERVENTION IN GREECE, 1944-45 As the Second World War drew towards a close, the leader of the Labour party, Clement Attlee, was well aware of the meagre and mediocre nature of his party’s representation in the House of Lords. With the Labour leader in the Lords, Lord Addison, he hatched a plan whereby a number of worthy Labour veterans from the Commons would be elevated to the upper house in the 1945 New Years Honours List. The plan, however, was derailed at the last moment. On 19 December Attlee wrote to tell Addison that ‘it is wiser to wait a bit. We don’t want by-elections at the present time with our people in a rather emotional state on Greece – the Com[munist]s so active’.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Perspectives on the World's Search for Stable Democracy
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 1 (1992) Issue 2 "Winds of Change" Symposium Article 2 October 1992 Introduction: Perspectives on the World's Search for Stable Democracy Rodney A. Smolla Darlene P. Bradberry Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Comparative Politics Commons Repository Citation Rodney A. Smolla and Darlene P. Bradberry, Introduction: Perspectives on the World's Search for Stable Democracy, 1 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 177 (1992), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ wmborj/vol1/iss2/2 Copyright c 1992 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj WILLIAM AND MARY BILL OF RIGHTS JOURNAL VOLUME 1 FALL 1992 ISSUE 2 WINDS OF CHANGE: PERSPECTIVES ON THE WORLD'S SEARCH FOR STABLE DEMOCRACY by Rodney A. Smolla* and Darlene P. Bradberry** I. In November 1992, the German government summoned the citizens of Germany to stage a march through Berlin in a massive demonstration of the nation's commitment to tolerance and human rights. The march was scheduled to coincide with the anniversary of two events in German history, one monstrous and one triumphant: the commencement in 1938 of the Nazi Kristallnacht pogrom against Jews, and the 1989 fall of the )erlin Wall. The march should have been a celebration of peace and hope, a signal to the world that the reunited Germany was dedicated to equality, the rule of law, and protection of human dignity. Indeed the German government and the vast majority of the German people are so dedicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Yalta, a Tripartite Negotiation to Form the Post-War World Order: Planning for the Conference, the Big Three’S Strategies
    YALTA, A TRIPARTITE NEGOTIATION TO FORM THE POST-WAR WORLD ORDER: PLANNING FOR THE CONFERENCE, THE BIG THREE’S STRATEGIES Matthew M. Grossberg Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History, Indiana University August 2015 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Master’s Thesis Committee ______________________________ Kevin Cramer, Ph. D., Chair ______________________________ Michael Snodgrass, Ph. D. ______________________________ Monroe Little, Ph. D. ii ©2015 Matthew M. Grossberg iii Acknowledgements This work would not have been possible without the participation and assistance of so many of the History Department at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Their contributions are greatly appreciated and sincerely acknowledged. However, I would like to express my deepest appreciation to the following: Dr. Anita Morgan, Dr. Nancy Robertson, and Dr. Eric Lindseth who rekindled my love of history and provided me the push I needed to embark on this project. Dr. Elizabeth Monroe and Dr. Robert Barrows for being confidants I could always turn to when this project became overwhelming. Special recognition goes to my committee Dr. Monroe Little and Dr. Michael Snodgrass. Both men provided me assistance upon and beyond the call of duty. Dr. Snodgrass patiently worked with me throughout my time at IUPUI, helping my writing progress immensely. Dr. Little came in at the last minute, saving me from a fate worse than death, another six months of grad school. Most importantly, all credit is due Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey D. Sachs
    2018 John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey D. Sachs Table of Contents World Happiness Report 2018 Editors: John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard, and Jeffrey D. Sachs Associate Editors: Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, Haifang Huang and Shun Wang 1 Happiness and Migration: An Overview . 3 John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey D. Sachs 2 International Migration and World Happiness . 13 John F. Helliwell, Haifang Huang, Shun Wang and Hugh Shiplett 3 Do International Migrants Increase Their Happiness and That of Their Families by Migrating? . 45 Martijn Hendriks, Martijn J. Burger, Julie Ray and Neli Esipova 4 Rural-Urban Migration and Happiness in China . 67 John Knight and Ramani Gunatilaka 5 Happiness and International Migration in Latin America . 89 Carol Graham and Milena Nikolova 6 Happiness in Latin America Has Social Foundations . 115 Mariano Rojas 7 America’s Health Crisis and the Easterlin Paradox . 146 Jeffrey D. Sachs Annex: Migrant Acceptance Index: Do Migrants Have Better Lives in Countries That Accept Them? . 160 Neli Esipova, Julie Ray, John Fleming and Anita Pugliese The World Happiness Report was written by a group of independent experts acting in their personal capacities. Any views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization, agency or programme of the United Nations. 2 Chapter 1 3 Happiness and Migration: An Overview John F. Helliwell, Vancouver School of Economics at the University of British Columbia, and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Richard Layard, Wellbeing Programme, Centre for Economic Performance, at the London School of Economics and Political Science Jeffrey D. Sachs, Director, SDSN, and Director, Center for Sustainable Development, Columbia University The authors are grateful to the Ernesto Illy Foundation and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research for research support, and to Gallup for data access and assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC)
    Cold War PS MB 10/27/03 8:28 PM Page 146 House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) Excerpt from “One Hundred Things You Should Know About Communism in the U.S.A.” Reprinted from Thirty Years of Treason: Excerpts From Hearings Before the House Committee on Un-American Activities, 1938–1968, published in 1971 “[Question:] Why ne Hundred Things You Should Know About Commu- shouldn’t I turn “O nism in the U.S.A.” was the first in a series of pam- Communist? [Answer:] phlets put out by the House Un-American Activities Commit- You know what the United tee (HUAC) to educate the American public about communism in the United States. In May 1938, U.S. represen- States is like today. If you tative Martin Dies (1900–1972) of Texas managed to get his fa- want it exactly the vorite House committee, HUAC, funded. It had been inactive opposite, you should turn since 1930. The HUAC was charged with investigation of sub- Communist. But before versive activities that posed a threat to the U.S. government. you do, remember you will lose your independence, With the HUAC revived, Dies claimed to have gath- ered knowledge that communists were in labor unions, gov- your property, and your ernment agencies, and African American groups. Without freedom of mind. You will ever knowing why they were charged, many individuals lost gain only a risky their jobs. In 1940, Congress passed the Alien Registration membership in a Act, known as the Smith Act. The act made it illegal for an conspiracy which is individual to be a member of any organization that support- ruthless, godless, and ed a violent overthrow of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Europe
    LETTER TO EUROPE by Philip H Gordon In an open letter, Washington’s top Europe-watcher proposes a “new deal” to help drag transatlantic relations out of their postwar low. The future of the west is at stake EAR FRIENDS.How did it come to this? I icans and Europeans on a range of issues. The end of cannot remember a time when the gulf the cold war, the rise of US military, political and eco- between Europeans and Americans was nomic power during the 1990s, and Europe’s preoc- so wide. For the past couple of years, I cupation with the challenges of integration and Dhave argued that the Iraq crisis was a sort of “perfect enlargement, have combined to accentuate these dif- storm” unlikely to be repeated, and that many of the ferences. But we have had different strategic perspec- recent tensions resulted from the personalities and tives—and fights about strategy—for years, and that shortcomings of key actors on both sides. The never prevented us from working together towards transatlantic alliance has overcome many crises common goals. And despite the provocations from before, and given our common interests and values ideologues on both sides, this surely remains possible and the enormous challenges we face, I have been today. Leaders still have options, and decisions to confident that we could also overcome this latest spat. make. They shape their environment as much as they Now I just don’t know any more. After a series of are shaped by it. The right choices could help put the increasingly depressing trips to Europe, even my world’s main liberal democracies back in the same optimism is being tested.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dulles Brothers, Harry Dexter White, Alger Hiss, and the Fate of the Private Pre-War International Banking System ダレ ス兄弟、ハリー·デクスター·ホワイト、アルジャー·ヒス 戦前の民 間国際金融制度の運命
    Volume 12 | Issue 16 | Number 3 | Article ID 4109 | Apr 20, 2014 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Dulles Brothers, Harry Dexter White, Alger Hiss, and the Fate of the Private Pre-War International Banking System ダレ ス兄弟、ハリー·デクスター·ホワイト、アルジャー·ヒス 戦前の民 間国際金融制度の運命 Peter Dale Scott administration… was able to act almost at will as he was shielded German translation is available from any unpleasant consequences.3 The election of Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1952 had permanent consequences for U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. major oil companies, which The 1952 Republican campaign, for which John before the election were facing criminal Foster Dulles was partly responsible, charges for their cartel arrangements, instead successfully attacked Truman’s supposed were freed to continue their activities, until “In weakness in dealing with the alleged treason of two of his civil servants, Treasury assistant some of the faraway countries where it did secretary Harry Dexter White, and State business.… Exxon’s sway over local politics and Department official Alger Hiss. In fact neither security was greater than that of the United White nor Hiss was ever convicted of treason; States embassy.”1 Parallel to this was a radical nor were they ever proven to have committed escalation in 1953 of CIA covert operations. it. But both men’s careers had been ruined by Major plots to overthrow the governments of the sensational charges brought against them Iran and Guatemala, both of which had been in 1948 by a freshman congressman, Richard turned down by Truman and his Secretary of Nixon, in the House Un-American Activities State, Dean Acheson, now proceeded, Committee (HUAC).
    [Show full text]
  • Just Before Bretton Woods: the Atlantic City Conference, June 1944
    JUST BEFORE BRETTON WOODS: THE ATLANTIC CITY CONFERENCE, JUNE 1944 Just Before Bretton Woods: The Atlantic City Conference, June 1944 Edited by Kurt Schuler and Gabrielle Canning CENTER FOR FINANCIAL STABILITY NEW YORK Copyright 2019 by Kurt Schuler and Gabrielle Canning. All rights reserved. Until 2030, no part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form without written permission from the authors. Send requests to Kurt Schuler, <[email protected]>. Starting in 2030, the authors permit anyone to reproduce the electronic edition of the book and the online companion files, provided that there is no alteration to the original content and that distribution to readers is free. The authors continue to reserve all other rights, including the rights to the print edition and translation rights. E-book and print editions published 2019 by the Center for Financial Stability, 1120 Avenue of the Americas, 4th floor, New York, NY 10036 Cover by Laneen Wells, Sublation Studio; front cover design inspired by the Claridge Hotel, Atlantic City Online companion files to this book are available at the Web site of the Center for Financial Stability, <www.centerforfinancialstability.org> Cataloging data will be available from the Library of Congress ISBN 978-1-941801-04-8 (e-book), 978-1-941801-05-5 (hardcover) The Center for Financial Stability (CFS) is a private, nonprofit institution focusing on global finance and markets. Its research is nonpartisan. This publication reflects the judgments of the authors. It does not necessarily represent the views of members of the Center’s Advisory Board or Trustees, or their affiliated organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Alger Hiss, One­ Time Trusted Adviser to Presiden
    The Weather lent ~ On. the Inside Cloudy aDd colde,r "i01 Iowa Wins, 12·9 o·("a ional licht rain to­ l e~s .• ' p ~e 4 day. Partly cloudy and (old~r tonl,hL aturdaY • Ghost of ~urde r Inc, 5Sl0n . • • Paqe 5 It' ('rally fair. Hlc"h Wela,., 35- ~ O: 10"', 15-25. Hleb Meat Strike Postponed , • Paqe 6 e al W~(' day. 46; low, 20. Eat 1868 ·- AP Leased Wire. AP Wuephoto. UP Leased Wire - Five Cents Iowa City. Iowa. Friday. Mench 23. 1951 - Vol. 85. No. 143 Hiss Begins • 5-Year Term y I t - aster NEW YORK - Alger Hiss, one­ time trusted adviser to Presiden. Roosevelt, was whisked off to jail Thursday to begin serving a five-year perjury sentence. Hiss, protesting his innocence .... mittee to the end, surrendered to a U.S. marshal at 10:40 a.m. to begin a five~year prison lerm. He was con- Charged with (story of JIls;' rise and faU on pax-e 2) Contempt; vicled o[ perjury in saying he never gave secret government in­ Freed on Sa il formation to Whittaker Ch<lmbe;·~. a Communist courier, and did not Cfr.m lb. Win ",vi ... ) see CohambCrs alter Jan. I, 1937. WASHINGTON - J.ke (Gr ..Y His onJ.y words were that he Thumb) Guzik, pudlY "pay-m. t­ had "nothing to add" to previous er" ot the notorlou Chicago Ca­ professions of innocence. He dis- I pone syndicate, refused to answ~r played no particular emotio.1, qu tions (or enate crime invest­ though he did smile jl time or two.
    [Show full text]