DOCSLIB.ORG

RTC Master Plan Final Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RTC Master Plan Final Environmental Assessment James J. Rowley Training Center Master Plan Environmental Assessment Laurel, Maryland Prepared for: United States Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security By: AECOM Project Number: GS-11P-12-MK-C-0012 August 2012 Revised and Approved September 2012 This page intentionally left blank. JAMES J. ROWLEY TRAINING CENTER MASTER PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Responsible Agency: U.S. Secret Service Abstract: The U.S. Secret Service (USSS) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) for the James J. Rowley Training Center (RTC) Master Plan 2012 Update, located in Prince George’s County, Maryland. The project includes the construction of new facilities, the renovation of existing facilities, the consolidation of facilities into precincts, infrastructure expansion, and security upgrades. This EA considers the environmental effects of implementing a No Action (No Build) Alternative and an Action Alternative. For information concerning this document contact: Mr. Alan Harwood, AICP Vice President AECOM 675 North Washington Street Suite 300 Alexandria, VA 22314 (703)739-4747 Email: [email protected] This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Location ................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action ...................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Project Background ........................................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Public and Agency Involvement ........................................................................................ 1-5 1.6 Issues and Impact Topics .................................................................................................. 1-6 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Proposed Action Alternative .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 No Action Alternative ......................................................................................................... 2-4 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Land Use and Planning Policies ........................................................................................ 3-1 3.3 Roadways and Traffic Patterns ......................................................................................... 3-7 3.4 Parking ............................................................................................................................ 3-10 3.5 Topography, Drainage, and Soils .................................................................................... 3-11 3.6 Water Resources ............................................................................................................ 3-15 3.7 Vegetation ....................................................................................................................... 3-19 3.8 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................. 3-23 3.9 Noise ............................................................................................................................... 3-24 3.10 Utilities ............................................................................................................................. 3-26 3.11 Stormwater Management ................................................................................................ 3-28 3.12 Sustainability ................................................................................................................... 3-29 3.13 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................................... 3-31 3.14 Coastal Zone Management ............................................................................................. 3-32 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 4.1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Land Use and Planning Policies Impacts .......................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Roadway and Traffic Pattern Impacts ............................................................................... 4-4 4.4 Parking Impacts ................................................................................................................ 4-8 4.5 Topography, Drainage, and Soil Impacts .......................................................................... 4-9 4.6 Water Resources Impacts ............................................................................................... 4-10 4.7 Vegetation Impacts ......................................................................................................... 4-16 4.8 Wildlife Impacts ............................................................................................................... 4-19 4.9 Noise Impacts ................................................................................................................. 4-20 4.10 Utilities Impacts ............................................................................................................... 4-21 4.11 Stormwater Management Impacts .................................................................................. 4-23 4.12 Sustainability Impacts...................................................................................................... 4-25 4.13 Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................................... 4-26 4.14 Coastal Zone Management ............................................................................................. 4-27 4.15 Cumulative Impacts ......................................................................................................... 4-29 5.0 APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................... 5-1 A Notification List .................................................................................................................. 5-4 B References ........................................................................................................................ 5-4 C List of Preparers ................................................................................................................ 5-6 D List of Acronyms and Abreviations .................................................................................... 5-7 E Scoping Letters ................................................................................................................. 5-9 Figures 1-1 Project Location ...........................................................................................................1-2 2-1 Proposed Master Plan Precincts ................................................................................. 2-5 2-2 Circulation ....................................................................................................................2-6 3-1 RTC Soil Types, Locations, and Existing Development ............................................ 3-13 3-2 Wetlands within the RTC and Existing Development ................................................ 3-17 3-3 Forest Stands at RTC Campus and Existing Development ....................................... 3-21 4-1 Wetlands Impacts ......................................................................................................4- 13 4-2 Existing/Removed Trees ........................................................................................... 4-17 Tables 3-1 LOS at Intersections in RTC Vicinity (Existing Conditions) ................................................ 3-7 4-1 LOS at Intersections in RTC Vicinity under Existing Conditions, No Action Alternative (Future No-Build), and Proposed Action Alternative ..................................................................... 4-5 4-2 Coastal Zone Management Policies ................................................................................ 4-28 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED This page intentionally left blank. RTC MASTER PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Purpose and Need 1.1 Introduction The James J. Rowley Training Center (RTC), located in Prince George’s County, Maryland, is owned and operated by the U.S. Secret Service (USSS). The mission of the RTC is to develop, administer, and coordinate all training programs related to the protective, investigative, and administrative activities of the agency. The USSS proposes to update its Master Plan dating from 1996 for the RTC to allow for gradual expansion and program improvements over the next 10 to 15 years. The goal of the James J. Rowley Training Center Master Plan, 2012 Update (2012 RTC Master Plan) is the creation of a world-class campus that efficiently utilizes the extensive land holdings of the RTC. The objectives are to provide tactical training facilities, classroom and conference instruction space, recreational facilities, and inter-campus transportation facilities,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dimensions Healthcare System Request for Proposals the State Of
    Dimensions Healthcare System Request for Proposals The State of Maryland and Prince George’s County have each enacted legislative policies that encourage the participation of locally- based and minority-owned businesses. I. DEFINITIONS 1.1 “Contractor” means the Offeror selected and contracted in accordance with sections 5.5 and 5.7 of this RFP to perform the work specified in Part IV of this RFP. 1.2 “Contract Manager” means the staff representative of the Oversight Committee designated in section 4.8 of this RFP who will oversee, on behalf of the Oversight Committee, the Project and the Contractor’s activities. 1.3 “Offeror” means an entity that submits a timely proposal in response to and in accordance with the terms of this RFP. 1.4 “Oversight Committee” or “Committee” means the committee created pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the State of Maryland and Prince George’s County described in section 2.2 of this RFP, to support and enhance the medical services provided by the health care facilities managed by Dimensions Healthcare System. 1.5 “Project” means the services described in Part IV of this RFP. 1.6 “Project Manager” means the individual representative of the Contractor designated in its proposal, pursuant to subsection 5.1.2 of this RFP, as responsible for management of the Project and the services described in Part IV of this RFP, and who serves as the primary point of contact for the Contractor regarding all tasks related to the engagement. 1.7 “Project Coordinator” means the representative or representatives of Dimensions Healthcare System identified in section 4.8 of this RFP who are responsible for on-site, day-to-day project coordination with the Contractor.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents January 8, 2020
    BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS TABLE OF CONTENTS JANUARY 8, 2020 LOCATION: STATE HOUSE, 100 STATE CIRCLE, GOVERNOR’S RECEPTION ROOM, ANNAPOLIS Section Overall Item page no. page no. SECRETARY’S AGENDA 1 Agriculture 1 2 Board of Public Works PAAR 2 3-4 3 Board of Public Works Wetlands 15-17 24 5 Board of Public Works Advisory 5 6 Office of the Attorney General 6 7-9 7 Housing & Community Dev’t 18-20 28 10 Environment 15 11 16 MD Stadium Authority 22 34 12-13 St. Mary’s College 17 14 Board of Public Works Regulations 21 21 Natural Resources 32 23 Supplemental: Record Correction 36 APPENDIX EMERGENCY REPORTS A1 App1 37 General Services A3 App4 40 A2 Human Services App2 38 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES/REAL PROPERTY SUPPLEMENT 1-3 Rural Legacy DNR1 41 4 MD Environmental Trust DNR8 48 5 Timber Sales DNR9 49 6-8 Program Open Space Local Share DNR10 50 9 Program Open Space State Share DNR13 53 UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND SUPPLEMENT 1 USM1 54 G.O. Bonds 8 USM15 68 2-3 University of MD, College Park USM3 56 4 USM8 61 University of MD Eastern Shore 7 USM13 66 5 University of MD, Baltimore USM11 64 6 USM12 65 Salisbury University 11 USM20 73 9-10 University of MD, Baltimore County USM16 69 12 Bowie State University USM22 75 PAGE TWO BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS TABLE OF CONTENTS JANUARY 8, 2020 Section Overall Item page no. page no. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1-4 MD Aviation Administration MDOT1 78 5-6 MD Port Administration MDOT8 85 7-8 MDOT15 92 MD Transit Administration 13-16 MDOT29 106 9-10 MDOT20 97 Motor Vehicle Administration 17-19 MDOT34 111 11-12 MDOT25 102 20 State Highway Administration MDOT41 118 23 MDOT49 126 21-22 The Secretary’s Office MDOT42 119 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES 1-10 OSP1 133 Capital Grants & Loans 43-53 OSP70 202 11-13 OSP13 149 Construction 54 OSP81 213 14-21 OSP18 150 28-29 OSP49 181 55-59 OSP82 214 Services 80 OSP130 262 82 OSP138 270 83 OSP141 273 22-25 OSP33 165 40-42 OSP64 196 60-66 Information Technology OSP91 223 78 OSP127 259 79 OSP129 261 26-27 OSP44 176 39 Maintenance OSP62 194 67-69 OSP111 243 30 OSP53 185 G.O.
    [Show full text]
  • News and Notes Prince George's County J § 'W
    News and Notes Prince George's County J § 'W . CO , Historical Society ! = = 3 e 'MaritlU' February 1997 Our 45th Year Volume XXV Number 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1997 President - Jane Eagen Directors 1997-1999 Past Presidents Vice President - Eugene Roberts, Jr. Mildred Ridgeley Gray John Giannetti Secretary - Sarah Bourne Melinda Alter Paul T. Lanham Treasurer - John Bourne Katherine Clagett Warren Rhoads Historian - Frederick DeMarr Directors 1996-1998 W.C. (Bud) Button Editor - Sharon Howe Sweeting Julie Bright Joyce MacDonald John Mitchell William Uber Illustration by Fred H. Greenberg from Washington Itself by E. J. Applewhite, 1986 JOIN US on SATURDAY, MARCH 8 at 2:00 pm at the Glenn Dale Community Center Mr David J. Danelski, Supreme Court Historian, will speak on Sons of Maryland on the United States Supreme Court: Thomas Johnson, Samuel Chase, Gabriel Duvall, Roger Brooke Taney and Thurgood Marshall. Mr. Danelski has researched, taught and written extensively about the United States Supreme Count. He will share little know stories and attempt to undo some popular misconceptions about these men. We have invited the members of the Duvall Society to join us for this celebration of Gabriel Duvall. The reception following the program will be at Marietta, home of Gabriel Duvall. FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK Happy New Year. You will notice on the cover the new/old Board of Directors of the Historical Society and an announcement of the meeting on Saturday, March 8 (2:00 pm, Glenn Dale Community Center) on "Sons of Maryland on the United States Supreme Court." This issue begins with the continuation of a column called Meet the Meet the Board Board written by Secretary Sarah Bourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowie State MARC Station Area
    A Technical Assistance Panel Report Bowie State MARC Station Area Sponsored by: Bowie State MARC Station Development Board and Prince George’s County Planning Department The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission October 17-18, 2011 1 Bowie State MARC Station Area Prince George’s County, MD October 17-18, 2011 A Technical Assistance Panel Report ULI Washington 4909 Cordell Avenue 2nd Floor Bethesda, MD 20814 (240) 497-1919 Fax: (240) 497-1818 www.washington.uli.org 2 About ULI Washington A District Council of the Urban Land Institute ULI Washington is a district council of ULI–the Urban Land Institute, a nonprofit education and research organization supported by its members. Founded in 1936, the Institute today has over 30,000 members worldwide representing the entire spectrum of land use planning and real estate development disciplines, working in private enterprise and public service. As the preeminent, multidisciplinary real estate forum, ULI facilitates the open exchange of ideas, information, and experience among local, national, and international industry leaders and policy makers dedicated to creating better communities. ULI’s mission is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. ULI Washington carries out the ULI mission locally by sharing best practices, building consensus, and advancing solutions through its educational programs and community outreach initiatives. About the Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) Program The objective of ULI Washington’s Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) program is to provide expert, multidisciplinary advice on land use and real estate issues facing public agencies and nonprofit organizations in the Washington Metropolitan area.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the James J
    Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the James J. Rowley Training Center Master Plan, 2017 Update November 2017 Prepared for Department of Homeland Security/ United States Secret Service JAMES J. ROWLEY TRAINING CENTER MASTER PLAN, 2017 UPDATE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Responsible Agency: U.S. Secret Service Abstract: The U.S. Secret Service (USSS) has prepared this Supplemental Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the James J. Rowley Training Center (RTC) Master Plan 2017 Update, located in Prince George’s County, Maryland. The project includes the construction of new facilities, the renovation of existing facilities, the consolidation of facilities into precincts, infrastructure expansion, and security upgrades. This SEA considers the environmental effects of implementing a No Action (No Build) Alternative and an Action Alternative. For information concerning this document contact: Communications Center, SAF Attn: Thomas Franklin 245 Murray Lane, SW, Bldg. T-5 Washington, DC 20223 [email protected] Supplemental EA for the James J. Rowley Training Center Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Purpose and Need for the Action
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit, Commission
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT, COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 1138 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June P, 1971 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 671 Company for Permanent Authority ) to Operate Route X Between ) Docket No. 226 Laurel , Maryland and Washington, ) D. C. By Application No. 671, filed on December 17, 1970, WMA Transit Company (WMA) sought to amend its WMATC Certificate- of Public Convenience and Necessity No. 8 to add authority to operate between Laurel, Maryland and Washington, D. C. WMA proposed to operate one round trip each day over the following route: From Lau rel to Farra ut S oars Commencing at Cherry Lane and U. S. Highway Route I (Laurel Shopping Center), thence via U.S. Highway Route 1, Maryland State- Route 198, Irving Street, Maryland State Route 197 (Bowie-Laurel Road), Briar- croft Lane, Briarwood Road,.Contee Road, Maryland State Route 197, cut-off to southbound Baltimore- Washington Parkway, Baltimore Washington Parkway, Kenilworth Avenue, cut-off to East Capitol Street, East Capitol Street Bridge, C Street, N.E.; North Carolina Avenue, N.E.; Constitution Avenue, N.E.; 3rd Street, N.W.; C Street, S.W.; 6th Street, S.W.; D Street, S.W.; thru S,W. Bus Terminal, D Street, S'.W.; lath Street, S.W.; Independence Avenue, S.W.; 14th Street, S.W.; H Street, N.W.; Connecticut Avenue, N.W., to Terminal Stand south of Farragut Square. From_Farragut Square to Laurel Commencing at Terminal Stand on Connecticut Avenue south of Farragut Square, thence via Eye Street, N.W.; 14th Street, N.W.; Independence Avenue, S.W.;, 12th Street; S.W.; D Street, S.W.; thru S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor and City Council of Laurel Department of Economic and Community Development
    MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8103 Sandy Spring Road Laurel, Maryland 20707 (301) 725-5300 Web: http://www.cityoflaurel.org E-mail: [email protected] DATE October 4, 2018 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 AMENDED TECHNICAL STAFF REPORT TO: City of Laurel Planning Commission FROM: Christian L. Pulley, Director CASE: Patuxent Greens Golf Course- Final Site & Landscape Plan GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: ADC Builders Inc. 6290 Montrose Road Rockville, MD 20852 OWNER: Cohen Siegel Investors 6290 Montrose Road Rockville, MD 20852 LOCATION: 14415 Greenview Drive Laurel, MD 20708 ZONE: Planned Unit Development Existing (PUD-E) REQUESTED ACTION: Final Site and Landscape Plan Approval PREVIOUS ACTION: First Annexation 1981 PUD Amendment September 12, 1983 (Resolution No. 16-83) PUD Amendment September 10, 1984 (Resolution No. 12-84) Map Amendment (No. 330) October 22, 1984 (Resolution No. 14-84) Map Amendment (No. 502) June 4, 1990 (Ordinance No. 934) Departure of Approved PUD Plan, December 11, 2017 (17-17-PC) Map Amendment No. 880 (17-16-PC), Ordinance No. 1924, January 22, 2018 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Applicant is seeking Final Site and Landscape Plan approval to re-develop the Patuxent Greens Golf Course, located at 14415 Greenview Drive, Laurel, MD 20708 into a residential community. The subject property consists of 191.71 acres of land and is located on the eastern corner of Greenview Drive and Clubhouse Boulevard. The property is approximately one-tenth of a mile southeast from the intersection of Laurel Bowie Road (Maryland Route 197) and Clubhouse Boulevard. The proposed project is to subdivide land into 222 townhouses and 167 single-family homes for 1 389 residential development units (36.67 acres).
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Master Plan for Redevelopment of Old Town Bowie
    0ili r I I I i iii Master Plan for Redevelopn1ent of I Old To vn Bo vie j j I I I I I I I I City of Bowie I and the Old Town Bowie Steering Committee Ii Thomas Point Associates Inc The Faux Group Inc lOT Associates Inc II D FeinDesign KELLERCo I i aUitrl Seprember 1999 Table of Contents Section No Title Page No Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 1 2 Existing Conditions 2 1 Overview 2 1 2 2 Design and Infrastructure 2 3 2 3 Traffic and Transportation 2 20 2 4 Conclusions 2 22 3 Market Analysis 3 1 Demographic and Economic Conditions 31 3 2 Existing Market Conditons 39 JM 3 3 Analysis of Tourism 317 3 4 Projections 322 3 5 Conclusions 327 4Ii 4 Plan Overview 4 1 Vision 41 4 2 Recommendations 41 4 3 Zoning and Development Regulatory Tools 43 4 Parking Improvements 412 4 5 Traffic Improvements 415 4 6 Development Opportunities 418 4 7 Conclusions 430 5 Implementation Financing and Financial Feasibility 5 1 Costs Priorities and Responsibilities 51 5 2 Funding and Phasing 53 5 3 Implementation Tools 53 54 Cost Benefit Analysis 59 5 5 Retail Leasing Strategy 5 16 5 6 Marketing Plan 520 5 7 Conclusions 525 6 Conclusions 61 Executive Summary Executive Summary Old Town Bowie Redevelopment Plan In February 1999 the City ofBowie retained a team of consultants in design transportation and economics to prepare this master plan for Old Town Bowie the historic village center ofthe City ililIl The consultants held public meetings and discussions with business leaders and residents their in order to structure conclusions and recommendations Residents spoke
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary July, 2016
    Facilities Master Plan Executive Summary July, 2016 Bowie State University Facilities Master Plan 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION SNAPSHOT IN TIME This Facilities Master Plan (the “Plan”) addresses the accomplishments, needs and aspirations of Bowie State University (BSU) at a time when the University is poised to continue its track towards first rate facilities, accommodating BSU’s program offerings and the aspirations of its students. The Plan acknowledges the fiscal realities of 2016 capital planning while keeping the needs of the institution as paramount, within the long range vision. The Plan embraces the University’s pride in its history, programs, and campus and lays out a roadmap for development which, if fully implemented, will provide the facilities necessary to satisfy the needs of a modern, comprehensive university. Major drivers influencing this plan include the following: • Academics • Costs and Economics • Quality of Life • Legacy Major considerations included the following: • Institutional objectives and values • The student experience • The campus and campus environment PURPOSE The Plan was undertaken to establish a framework for the physical growth and change that can be anticipated for Bowie State University over the next ten years. It establishes projected enrollment growth and space needs. Several capital projects are identified and others are suggested. For each major project the master plan will need to be followed by programming, design and construction. The master plan does not attempt to design projects but it does provide a campus development plan which suggests locations for specific projects and organizes them within the boundaries of the current campus. METHODOLOGY The team has: • Used existing information to create the base site plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowie State University Facilities Master Plan 2020-2030 Executive Summary January 2021
    BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY FACILITIES MASTER PLAN 2020-2030 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JANUARY 2021 BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY University System of Maryland Board of Regents Linda R. Gooden, Chair Barry P. Gossett, Vice-Chair Gary L. Attman, Treasurer Michelle A. Gourdine, M.D., Secretary William T. Wood, Assistant Treasurer Robert D. Rauch, Assistant Secretary Joseph Bartenfelder ex officio Ellen Fish Geoff J. Gonella James Holzapfel D’Ana Johnson Isiah Leggett Sam Malhotra Meredith M. Mears Robert R. Neall Louis Pope Kelly M. Schulz, ex officio Aaliyah Edwards, Student Regent Bowie State University Administration Dr. Aminta H. Breaux, President Dr. Carl Goodman, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Karen Johnson Shaheed, Esq., Executive Vice President and General Counsel Kimetta Hairston, Special Assistant to the President for Strategic Engagement Anthony P. Savia, Vice President for Administration and Finance Dr. Brian O. Clemmons, Vice President for Enrollment Management Marivic Weiss, Interim Vice President for Information Technology Brent Swinton, Vice President for Institutional Advancement Dr. Demetrius Johnson, Vice President for Student Affairs Clyde Doughty, Jr., Vice President for Intercollegiate Athletics and Recreation Cassandra Robinson, Director of University Relations and Marketing HORD COPLAN MACHT, INC. - ARCHITECTURE, CAMPUS PLANNING Consultants: Facilities Planning Associates – Facilities Planning Carroll Engineering, Inc. – Civil Engineering Gipe Associates, Inc. – Mechanical Electrical Engineering speXsys, Inc. – Special
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 5, 2015 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 8 P.M
    AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 5, 2015 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 8 p.m. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. QUORUM IV. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS/AMENDMENTS V. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION VI. PRESENTATIONS VII. CITY BOARDS AND COMMITTEES A. Appointments/Reappointments/Swearing-in Documents: 20150105 - MEMO FOR COMM. APPOINT.PDF VIII. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS IX. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT X. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of October 20 Meeting Minutes Documents: 20150105 - OCTOBER 20 MEETING MINUTES.PDF B. Approval of November 3 Meeting Minutes Documents: 20150105 - NOVEMBER 3 MEETING MINUTES.PDF C. Approval of November 17 Meeting Minutes Documents: 20150105 - NOVEMBER 17 MEETING MINUTES.PDF D. Approval of December 1 Meeting Minutes Documents: 20150105 - DECEMBER 1 MEETING MINUTES.PDF E. Approval of Resolution R-1-15 Approving Variance Application BV-5-14, a Request by Deborah M. and John W. Rice for a Variance of Three Feet From the Minimum Eight Foot Side Yard Setback Prescribed by the Prince George's County Zoning Ordinance to Validate an 11 Foot by 14 Foot Wood Deck on the South Side of the Existing Dwelling and to Permit the Construction of an 11 Foot by 14 Foot Sunroom Over the Existing Deck at 3127 Belair Drive Documents: 20150105 - RESOLUTION R-1-15.PDF F. Approval of Resolution R-2-15 Adopting a Climate Action Plan for the City Documents: 20150105 - RESOLUTION R-2-15.PDF G. Approval of Resolution R-4-15 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Annexation Agreement With Bowie Veterinary Properties, LLC Establishing the Terms and Conditions Governing the Proposed Annexation of Approximately 1.21419 Acres of Land Owned by Bowie Veterinary Properties, LLC, Located on the West Side of Maryland Route 197, North of Millstream Drive, Into the Corporate Limits of the City of Bowie Documents: 20150105 - RESOLUTION R-4-15.PDF H.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Position Statements
    L L ~.. /~-= i Cit' l of~BO',' frie I..,:)\i\ I,. ".'.--- 1. 4."7^' v. I . f)'1 ",- \"'~; '\" 2614,);./,hcnhiH Dri\{' 0'\ \ ';>19,'.lf;'.,, 1.,' ;;.;../ j\:;.~<.L~ ;;;,{ -~~ / .....,~,.,;;;/Bnwit. 1\iar~land 207! 5 I~ S' j..J..Y M~~" January 31, 2006 The Honorable Thomas E. Demoga, Chairman Prince George' s County Council County Administration Building Upper Marlboro, Maryland 20772 RE: Bowie and Vicinity Adopted Master Plan and Endorsed SMA Dear Chairman Demoga: The Bowie City Council has considered the specific amendments that are advertised for public hearing in CR- I- 2006. Consistent with past City positions, the Council wishes to offer the following comments: Amendment # 1 - The City opposes rezoning of the Autotech property from the C- S- C zone to the C- M zone. The proposed rezoning would be the only C- M zoning in the Bowie Mainstreet area and would allow intensification of the existing auto repair use and the possible introduction of incompatible redevelopment on the site. Any rezoning should await the findings of the recommended Sector Plan for the Bowie Mainstreet area. Amendment #4 - The City supports downzoning the MD 3/ US 301 median properties to the lowest density possible. We applaud your efforts in this regard. The City Council also wishes to indicate our opposition to Amendment # 21, which proposes rezoning of property in the US 30l/MD 214 median area from the R- A zone to the I- I zone. Amendment # 6 - The City opposes rezoning ofthe Chesley-Gibraltar property from the R-A zone to the C- S- C zone. We request that you honor our Preliminary Master Plan recommendation by retaining existing zoning and returning the property to the Rural Tier.
    [Show full text]