Foreign” Victims of Taiwan's 1947 February 28 Incident and Their

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foreign” Victims of Taiwan's 1947 February 28 Incident and Their Special Sessions -State Violence and Trauma “In the Shadow of Empires: “Foreign” Victims of Taiwan’s 1947 February 28 Incident and their Journey toward Justice and Reconciliation” Yoshihisa Amae1 [Japan, Chang Jung Christian University Associate Professor ] 1 The author is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of Taiwan Studies at Chang Jung Christian University. Email: [email protected] 1 Introduction The February 28 Incident of 1947 (hereafter simply “2/28”) had long been taboo in Taiwan under martial law. However, following the lifting of martial law in 1987, it has gradually gained publicity. In 1995, President Lee Teng-hui offered an apology to the victims and their families for their losses, and his government made measures to bring justice to the victims, including reparation and restoration of the victims’ reputation. The literature on 2/28 is vast, especially in the Chinese language. Few, but important, works exist in the English and Japanese literature as well (Kerr 1965; Lai, Myers, and Wei 1991; He 2003). Yet almost all of them focus on the victimhood of the native Taiwanese and the brutality of the Chinese perpetrators. Little is mentioned of the foreign victims, namely the Japanese, Okinawans, and Koreans. This is understandable for their existence has been unknown until quite recently (in 2015 Aoyama Esaki became the first foreign victim to be recognized by the Taiwanese government) and the numbers are small. As of August 2020, there are only three foreigners (two Japanese and one Korean) who have been officially recognized as “victims” and consequently received reparations from the Taiwanese government. Three other families from Okinawa had applied for reparations but their attempt has been so far unsuccessful. A study by an Okinawan scholar suggests that the number of Okinawan victims may be as large as thirty people (Matayoshi 2018: 348). There were also Korean victims: three men killed and one woman injured. Moreover, among the 1,461 names in the latest lists of possible 2/28 victims released by the Memorial Foundation of 228 between October 2018 and February 2020, eight of them have Japanese names (The Memorial Foundation of 228 2020). These numbers are very small compared to the numbers of alleged Taiwanese dead, which varies from several hundreds to a hundred thousand.2 While the number of deaths, together with other figures such as the duration of the incident and the percentage of casualties among the total population, does speak of the magnitude of the political tragedy, human lives cannot be reduced to sheer numbers: every single life matters. Each victim—mostly men in the case of 2/28—is somebody’s son, father, husband and friend. Their absence has left a lasting impact in those people’s lives. This impact can be larger for the remaining family if the person was the head of the household and the breadwinner, and larger for aliens than nationals due to the former’s precarious social and political status. Having said that, I believe tragedies cannot be 2 It is widely believed that 18,000 to 28,000 people perished in the 2/28 Incident as a consequence of the government crackdown. This figure was presented by the task force set up by the government to investigate the truth of the 2/28 Incident in 1992. However, in more recent research, scholars suggest the number of dead was much smaller. They estimate the number to be between 1,304 and 1,512 (Tang 2017). 2 compared. The pain and trauma caused by any tragedy is purely subjective and it is not the purpose of this paper to make any generalization on suffering. The main purpose of the paper is twofold. First, it attempts to investigate the foreign victims of 2/28: Who are they? How did they get involved? How did the families suffer from the loss of a family member? How did they deal with the trauma? I will try to narrate their personal stories. Such narratives are important, not just as history, but in terms of taking the discussion on 2/28 beyond the hitherto dualism that fixates on native Taiwanese as victims and Mainlanders as perpetrators. I hope to show that among the so called “poor victims” there is a subtle hierarchy. For example, often times in the discussion on 2/28 victims, a great focus is given to the social and political elite, and not to ordinary citizens.3 Victims with a Mainland Chinese background are often overlooked, if not ignored, simply because they are equated with the state apparatus and its agents that exercised violence. And foreigners are neglected. The foreign victims of 2/28 are thus arguably marginalized within the narratives of 2/28. Unlike the native Taiwanese victims, who eventually had their voices heard due to the backing of the native Democratic Progressive Party, foreign victims remained voiceless and endured a subaltern-like status, even after political liberalization in the 1990s. Their marginality is most evident in the politics of remembering: non-ROC citizens were, until 2016, excluded from seeking retributive justice. The irony of this practice is that while the state apparatus and the violence it exercised did not discriminate, the government (a democratic one!) and the justice it is reattributing are. The second purpose of this paper is to contemplate the “Japanese factor” in the 2/28 Incident: that is to think of the suffering that Japanese imperialism had inflicted on the parties concerned, including those foreign subjects (Japanese, Okinawans, and Koreans) who were killed. One should be reminded, however, that less than two years prior to 2/28, they weren’t “foreign” to their Taiwanese counterparts; they were all subjects of the Japanese empire and one nation, in which Okinawans were seen as the elder brother, Koreans as the younger brother, and Taiwanese as the youngest brother (Matayoshi 2018: 111).4 Okinawans and Koreans were present in Taiwan as a result of political annexation and national integration orchestrated by the Japanese empire. Differently put, their presence, which was magnified through the tragic event of 2/28, reveals the issue that had long been submerged in face of the brutal state violence and the drama that unfolded in the confrontation between the native Taiwanese and the Mainlanders and the ensuing political and national trauma. To be sure, the Japanese state and its agents were not present in the Incident: the Japanese authorities in Taiwan surrendered to the Chinese Nationalists (KMT) on October 25, 1945, and by April 1946, most Japanese nationals had been 3 A good example of this is a work by Lee (1990). 4 The Yamato race or naichijin, extending this metaphor, is the father and mother figure. Japan annexed Okinawa in 1879, acquired Taiwan as a colony in 1895 as the result of its victory against Qing China, and annexed Korea in 1910 by imperial Japan. 3 repatriated to their homeland. Yet their influence lasted beyond their physical presence. Between the lines of the 2/28 narratives, be it the “pro-Chinese” or “pro-Taiwanese,” appear traces of Japanese imperialism, such as the KMT accusation that Taiwanese people being “poisoned with (or enslaved by) the Japanese education” or the fact that Japanese language was used by the Taiwanese rioters to distinguish themselves from the “enemy.”5 In sum, the presence of foreign 2/28 victims not only reminds one of the past Japanese imperial ambitions, but also invokes their colonial responsibility, which is often neglected in the dominant postwar narrative of Japan being a peace-loving nation. A Genealogy of Foreign 2/28 victims It is unknown to the Taiwanese that one of the first victims of 2/28 was a Japanese, Kimura Toshio, a staff of the Committee of Overseas Japanese6 who was shot dead in front of the Taiwan Provincial Administrative Executive Office on February 28 during the mass protest over police violence against an illicit cigarette vendor on the previous night. It is unclear as to why Kimura took the risk of being there. It may have been that he was on a mission to gather information on the situation, or he may have been at the site out of pure curiosity. What we know is that nobody had imagined that the security guards would have opened fire on peaceful protesters, killing several and wounding many (Kerr 1966: 256). The government wasted no time in offering an apology to the victim’s family and the Japanese community, as well as compensating 200,000 Old Taiwan dollars for the loss (Kawahara 1997: 44). However, that was not the case for several other Japanese nationals killed, arrested, or who remain missing in 2/28. There appear to be two other Japanese nationals involved in the 2/28 Incident, according to the official report sent by Chen Yi to Chiang Kai-shek on March 13, 1947: Horiuchi Kinjyo and Uesaki Torazaburo. Their names appear in the appendix of the report, together with 18 Taiwanese, including people like Chen Xin and Lin Mao-sheng (Institute of Modern History Academia Sinica 1992: 177). The report does not confirm their death but other materials confirmed that all the people on the list were later executed as “rebels.” According to the information given on the list, Horiuchi and Uesaki were both labelled as “underground agents” and accused of assisting the rebellion and the killing of Chinese Mainlanders (waishengren). Little is known about Uesaki’s whereabouts. However, materials remain regarding Horiuchi. 5 At times, the suspicious ones were asked to sing Kimigayo, the Japanese anthem. 6 This was a semi-official agency consisting of staffs of the former Office of the Governor-in-General to manage the affairs of the near 8,000 Japanese bureaucrats, engineers, and academics and their families who were retained by the KMT government (Wu 2005).
Recommended publications
  • Writing Taiwan History: Interpreting the Past in the Global Present
    EATS III Paris, 2006 Writing Taiwan History: Interpreting the Past in the Global Present Ann Heylen Research Unit on Taiwanese Culture and Literature, Ruhr University Bochum [email protected] Do not cite, work in progress Introduction Concurrent with nation building is the construction of a national history to assure national cohesion. Hence, the collective memory is elevated to the standard of national myth and most often expressed in the master narrative. I may refer here to Michael Robinson’s observation that “the state constructs and maintains a ‘master narrative’ of nation which acts as an official ‘story of the nation’. This master narrative legitimates the existence of the state and nation internally; it is also projected externally, to legitimate a nations’ existence in the world community”.1 But in as much as memory is selective, so also is the state-sanctioned official narrative, and it has become commonplace that changes in the political order enhance and result in ideologically motivated re-writing of that history in spite of its claims at objectivity and truth. The study of the contemporary formation of Taiwan history and its historiography is no exception. In fact, the current activity in rewriting the history is compounded by an additional element, and one which is crucial to understanding the complexity of the issue. What makes Taiwanese historiography as a separate entity interesting, intriguing and complex is that the master-narrative is treated as a part of and embedded in Chinese history, and at the same time conditioned by the transition from a perceived to a real pressure from a larger nation, China, that lays claim on its territory, ethnicity, and past.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Autonomy: Constructing a Place for Ethnic Minorities in Taiwan’S Emerging Civic Society
    Indigenous Autonomy: Constructing a Place for Ethnic Minorities in Taiwan’s Emerging Civic Society Scott Simon, professeur agrégé Département de sociologie et anthropologie Université d’Ottawa, Canada Chercheur invité Institut d’Asie Orientale, ÉNS-LSH Lyon, France Paper prepared for the Fifth European Association of Taiwan Studies (EATS) Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, 18-20 April, 2008. Please do not cite or quote without the written permission of the author. E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract: For more than two decades, indigenous autonomy has been one of the main demands of Taiwan’s indigenous rights movement. Indigenous autonomy was incorporated into Chen Shui-bian’s campaign promises in 1999, and subsequently adopted as a policy goal in the 2000 DPP White Paper on Indigenous Policy. In 2005, the passage of the Basic Law on Indigenous Peoples made it seem as if this goal could soon be fulfilled. The Taroko Nation, recognized by the ROC in 2004, initially seemed poised to create Taiwan’s first indigenous autonomous region. Those goals, however, have been slowed down by the emergence of communities and individuals in their defined territory who refuse Taroko identity and have launched a competing drive for recognition as the Sediq Nation. Some Taroko people also resist the project of autonomy on the grounds that it merely empowers a small elite and does nothing to address their more immediate economic problems. These counter movements suggest that more is at stake in “autonomy” than indigenous rights. This paper thus looks at the creation of indigenous autonomy as part of an emerging civic society for an independent Taiwan.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Statue Politics World War II Comfort Women Memorials in the United States
    Park Statue Politics World War II Comfort Women Memorials in the United States THOMAS J. WARD & WILLIAM D. LAY i Park Statue Politics World War II Comfort Women Memorials in the United States THOMAS J. WARD AND WILLIAM D. LAY ii E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, England 2019 ISBN 978-1-910814-50-5 This book is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You are free to: • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission. Please contact [email protected] for any such enquiries, including for licensing and translation requests. Other than the terms noted above, there are no restrictions placed on the use and dissemination of this book for student learning materials/scholarly use. Production: Michael Tang Cover Image: Ki Young via Shutterstock A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. iii E-IR Open Access Series Editor: Stephen McGlinchey Books Editor: Cameran Clayton Editorial Assistants: Xolisile Ntuli and Shelly Mahajan E-IR Open Access is a series of scholarly books presented in a format that preferences brevity and accessibility while retaining academic conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering the Grandmothers: the International Movement to Commemorate the Survivors of Militarized Sexual Abuse in the Asia-Pacific War
    Volume 17 | Issue 4 | Number 1 | Article ID 5248 | Feb 15, 2019 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Remembering the Grandmothers: The International Movement to Commemorate the Survivors of Militarized Sexual Abuse in the Asia-Pacific War Vera Mackie, Sharon Crozier-De Rosa It is over seventy years since the issue of systematized sexual abuse in the Asia-Pacific War came to light in interrogations leading up The Australian War Memorial to the post-Second World War Military Tribunals. There was also widespreadThe Australian War Memorial was established vernacular knowledge of the system in the at the end of the First World War as a ‘shrine, a world-class museum, and an extensive early postwar period in Japan and its former 2 occupied territories. The movement for redress archive’. Its mission is to ‘assist Australians to for the survivors of this system gainedremember, interpret and understand the Australian experience of war and its enduring momentum in East and Southeast Asia in the 3 1970s. By the 1990s this had become a global impact on Australian society’. The holdings include ‘relics, official and private records, art, movement, making connections with other photographs, film, and sound’. The physical international movements and political archive is augmented by an extensive on-line campaigns on the issue of militarized sexual archive of digitized materials.4 From the end of violence. These movements have culminated in the First World War to the present, the advances in international law, where Memorial has been the official repository for militarized sexual violence has been addressed the documentation of Australia’s involvement in in ad hoc Military Tribunals on the former military conflicts and peacekeeping operations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presbyterian Church in Taiwan and the Advocacy of Local Autonomy
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 92 January, 1999 The Presbyterian Church in Taiwan and the Advocacy of Local Autonomy by Christine Louise Lin Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series edited by Victor H. Mair. The purpose of the series is to make available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including Romanized Modern Standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino-Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. The only style-sheet we honor is that of consistency. Where possible, we prefer the usages of the Journal of Asian Studies. Sinographs (hanzi, also called tetragraphs [fangkuaizi]) and other unusual symbols should be kept to an absolute minimum. Sino-Platonic Papers emphasizes substance over form.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of the Name Rectification Movement of Taiwan Indigenous People: Through Whose Historical Lens?
    LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS 13.3:523-568, 2012 2012-0-013-003-000320-1 Representations of the Name Rectification Movement of Taiwan Indigenous People: Through Whose Historical Lens? Sheng-hsiu Chiu1,2 and Wen-yu Chiang1 National Taiwan University1 Huafan University2 Within the theoretical and methodological framework based on the conceptual metaphor theory, the discourse-historical approach, and corpus linguistics, this article examines the various representations of Taiwan indigenous people’s name rectification movement in three major broadsheet newspapers, the United Daily News, the Liberty Times, and the Apple Daily in Taiwan. Using two-tier analysis, which incorporates the discourse-historical approach into the conceptual metaphor theory, we demonstrate that JOURNEY and CONFLICT metaphors, the two pre- dominant types identified in news coverage, are portrayed in divergent ways in different news media. By analyzing the cognitive characteristics of conceptual meta- phors in combination with other discursive/rhetorical strategies, we demonstrate that political orientations and underlying ideologies are ingrained in the corpora news reports, and the ways in which the newspapers’ publishers delineate the indigenous issue echo the different positions they take toward national identity. We hence posit that ‘Taiwan indigenous people as the positive Self’ construction is a pseudo-positive Self construction, which is merely a camouflage for the media’s real stance on viewing indigenous people as the Other. We argue that all of the representations of the name rectification movement in three different newspapers in Taiwan are based on intention, inextricably intertwined with the newspapers’ ideological stance of national identity, and are viewed through the historical lens of the Han people.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Nuances of Waishengren History and Agency
    China Perspectives 2010/3 | 2010 Taiwan: The Consolidation of a Democratic and Distinct Society Understanding the Nuances of Waishengren History and Agency Dominic Meng-Hsuan et Mau-Kuei Chang Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/5310 DOI : 10.4000/chinaperspectives.5310 ISSN : 1996-4617 Éditeur Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Édition imprimée Date de publication : 15 septembre 2010 ISSN : 2070-3449 Référence électronique Dominic Meng-Hsuan et Mau-Kuei Chang, « Understanding the Nuances of Waishengren », China Perspectives [En ligne], 2010/3 | 2010, mis en ligne le 01 septembre 2013, consulté le 28 octobre 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/5310 ; DOI : 10.4000/chinaperspectives.5310 © All rights reserved Special Feature s e v Understanding the Nuances i a t c n i e of Waishengren h p s c r History and Agency e p DOMINIC MENG-HSUAN YANG AND MAU-KUEI CHANG In the late 1940s and early 50s, the world witnessed a massive wave of political migrants out of Mainland China as a result of the Chinese civil war. Those who sought refuge in Taiwan with the KMT came to be known as the “mainlanders” or “ waishengren .” This paper will provide an overview of the research on waishengren in the past few decades, outlining various approaches and highlighting specific political and social context that gave rise to these approaches. Finally, it will propose a new research agenda based on a perspective of migration studies and historical/sociological analysis. The new approach argues for the importance of both history and agency in the study of waishengren in Taiwan.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Rights in Taiwan: the Feminist Factor, Democratization, and the Quest for Global Citizenship
    UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Previously Published Works Title Constructing rights in Taiwan: the feminist factor, democratization, and the quest for global citizenship Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4pf7n8g3 Journal PACIFIC REVIEW, 34(5) ISSN 0951-2748 Author Brysk, Alison Publication Date 2021-09-03 DOI 10.1080/09512748.2020.1784985 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE PACIFIC REVIEW https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1784985 Constructing rights in Taiwan: the feminist factor, democratization, and the quest for global citizenship Alison Brysk Department of Global Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA ABSTRACT In an era of worldwide rights regression, beleaguered Taiwan remains Asia’s most democratic, gender equitable, and liberal internationalist nation. What accounts for this seemingly exceptional record—and how does the feminist factor contribute to the construction of rights? Bridging constructivist and feminist scholarship, this essay argues that gender equity is a force multiplier for democratization as it empowers civil society and fosters legitimacy at home and abroad. In a three-level game, states at the margin of the inter- national system may benefit from rights reform that expands the national interest and delivers material and reputational rewards. The case of Taiwan illustrates the dynamics of the double transition to liberal democracy and a liberal gender regime and its projection to world politics. The rewards of rights for Taiwan suggest a wider range of options even in small states facing regional challenges—and greater attention to the feminist factor in world politics. KEYWORDS human rights; Taiwan; gender; democratization; transnationalism In an era of worldwide rights regression, Taiwan remains Asia’s most demo- cratic, gender equitable, and liberal internationalist nation.
    [Show full text]
  • From Persuasion to Coercion: Beijing's Approach to Taiwan and Taiwan's Response
    FROM PERSUASION TO COERCION: BEIJING’S APPROACH TO TAIWAN AND TAIWAN’S RESPONSE RICHARD BUSH NOVEMBER 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY high. The “just right” option is a mix of intimidation, pressure, and cooptation, which is what China has Beijing’s goal concerning Taiwan is decidedly done in response to President Tsai’s election. The risks revisionist. It wishes to end the island’s separate are lower and over time Taiwan’s will to resist might political existence and incorporate it into the People’s falter. Indeed, division and mistrust in Taiwan’s politics Republic of China under terms similar to those sap its ability to cope with an increasingly clever and employed for Hong Kong — known as one country, aggressive China. two systems (1C2S) — and so place limits on Taiwan’s sovereignty and democracy. INTRODUCTION That formula was unacceptable to Taiwan’s Of all the targets of the People’s Republic of China’s authoritarian leaders when it was first developed in (PRC) external policy, Taiwan is unique. From its the late 1980s. Once Taiwan made the transition to beginning in 1949, the PRC regime has claimed the democracy in the early 1990s, the public rejected island as part of China’s sovereign territory.1 Control of it as well. Democracy also opened the door to the Taiwan was important because it had been part of the minority on Taiwan who wanted de jure independence last imperial dynasty, and it was there that Chiang Kai- and total separation from China, a source of great shek and his Kuomintang (KMT)-led Republic of China concern in Beijing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grandmother and the Girl
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 1-1-2016 The Grandmother and the Girl Vera C. Mackie University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Mackie, Vera C., "The Grandmother and the Girl" (2016). Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers. 2760. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/2760 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] The Grandmother and the Girl Abstract I opened the white box and took out the figurine of a girl, a miniature chair, and a little pedestal with an inscription in Japanese, English and Korean. I assembled the diorama, placing the girl on the low pedestal, with the empty chair beside her. Without context, this act might have seemed like child's play - like placing a doll in a doll's house. Keywords girl, grandmother Disciplines Arts and Humanities | Law Publication Details V. Mackie 2016 The Grandmother and the Girl Australian Women's History Network http://www.auswhn.org.au/blog/grandmother-and-girl/ This creative work is available at Research Online: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/2760 The Grandmother and the Girl | Australian Women's History NetworkAustralian Women's History N... http://www.auswhn.org.au/blog/grandmother-and-girl/ AUSTRALIAN WOMEN'S HISTORY NETWORK The Grandmother and the Girl Vera Mackie explores women’s experiences of militarised sexual abuse during the Asia-Pacific War, and the survivors’ campaign for acknowledgement by the Japanese government in the eighth post in the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence series.
    [Show full text]
  • Topical Section: Taiwan As Epistemic Challenger Introduction: Taiwan As
    International Journal of Taiwan Studies 4 (2021) 211-217 Topical Section: Taiwan as Epistemic Challenger ∵ Introduction: Taiwan as Epistemic Challenger Chih-Jou Jay Chen Director and Professor, Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan [email protected] Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao Professor and Adjunct Research Fellow, Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan [email protected] Abstract Four articles are included in this topical section on ‘Taiwan as Epistemic Challenger’. Two of the four contributions were originally presented at the 3rd World Congress of Taiwan Studies held on 6–8 September 2018 at Academia Sinica in Taipei. The main theme of this Congress was ‘Taiwan in the Globalized World: The Relevance of Taiwan Studies to the Social Sciences and Humanities’. The other two contributions were accepted through a call for papers. The topical section aims to demonstrate that Taiwanese scholars and foreign researchers of Taiwanese society can transcend the competitive disadvantage of studying a single country and make Taiwan visible in international scholarship. The findings of relevant Taiwan studies research can instead modify the epistemic assumptions and methodology in different disciplines of the social sciences and humanities. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2021 | doi:10.1163/24688800-20211251Downloaded from Brill.com07/31/2021 11:34:57PM via Academia Sinica 212 chen and hsiao Keywords Taiwan – global history – civil society – identities – knowledge production The topical section on ‘Taiwan as Epistemic Challenger’ of this issue contains four articles from different research perspectives to address how Taiwan chal- lenges epistemic fundamentals or the assumptions of their respective disci- plines. They show what makes Taiwan an especially valuable subject of study for the international scholarly community, apart from its unique geopolitical status.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan Studies:” the Evolution and the Transformations of a Multi- Disciplinary Sub-Field, 1600 CE to 2013CE
    1 Studying “Taiwan Studies:” The Evolution and the Transformations of a Multi- Disciplinary Sub-field, 1600 CE to 2013CE Murray A. Rubinstein, Professor Emeritus, Baruch /CUNY Visiting Professor, Columbia University Introduction 1 In this essay I give you a grand and sweeping overview of Taiwan Studies. I discuss the evolution of our field/subfield and show how it developed within --and as witness to --the larger development of Taiwan as a political, diplomatic, economic, cultural and religious entity. My essay is broken down into a four different sections and conclusion. Section I. focuses upon what I term Proto-Taiwan studies. This means, those books about Taiwan that were produced those long periods in Taiwan’s history—and the study of Taiwan , from the coming of the Dutch VOC merchants and missionaries to the conquest and development of the island by the Zhengs and the Qing to the creation of the Treaty Port culture to the Japanese colonization, to the coming of the ROC military men, bureaucrats and mainland business elites, to entry of the American MAG and AID representatives with their aid and technological assistance All this was a prelude to the modern, post-1959 period, that began with the arrival of the Fulbright/Foundation for Scholarly Exchange researchers and college instructors who augured era when a distinctive field of research and scholarly presentation that would be later called “Taiwan Studies” began to evolve. 2 In Section II., I examine the first period in the development of modern Taiwan Studies. This period began in the late 1957s, with the arrival of a number of American anthropologists to the island.
    [Show full text]