Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Drug Resistance Mechanisms, and Therapy of Infections with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Drug Resistance Mechanisms, and Therapy of Infections with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Drug Resistance Mechanisms, and Therapy of Infections with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Barbara A. Brown-Elliott,a Kevin A. Nash,b and Richard J. Wallace, Jr.a Department of Microbiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA,a and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Saban Research Institute of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, and Department of Pathology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USAb Downloaded from INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................546 PRINCIPLES OF ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING ...............................................................................................546 Definitions................................................................................................................................................547 Evaluation and Interpretation ............................................................................................................................547 Laboratory qualifications ..............................................................................................................................547 Clinical significance of isolates.........................................................................................................................547 Limitations .............................................................................................................................................547 http://cmr.asm.org/ Methods for Susceptibility Testing of Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria ...................................................................................548 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns ..................................................................................................................548 Broth microdilution method...........................................................................................................................549 Agar disk elution.......................................................................................................................................549 Agar disk diffusion .....................................................................................................................................549 Etest ...................................................................................................................................................550 Methods for Susceptibility Testing of Slowly Growing Mycobacteria ....................................................................................550 Mycobacterium avium complex ........................................................................................................................550 Mycobacterium kansasii ................................................................................................................................550 Mycobacterium marinum...............................................................................................................................551 on September 25, 2014 by WALAEUS LIBRARY/BIN 299 Miscellaneous slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria ........................................................................................551 Fastidious slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria.............................................................................................551 ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY AND MECHANISMS OF DRUG RESISTANCE...................................................................................551 Inhibition of Mycobacterial Cell Wall Synthesis ..........................................................................................................551 Carbapenems and cephalosporins ....................................................................................................................551 Ethambutol............................................................................................................................................553 Isoniazid ...............................................................................................................................................553 Glycopeptides .........................................................................................................................................553 Inhibition of Protein Synthesis............................................................................................................................553 Aminoglycosides ......................................................................................................................................554 Tetracyclines and glycylcyclines .......................................................................................................................554 Macrolides and ketolides ..............................................................................................................................555 Oxazolidinones ........................................................................................................................................556 Inhibition of Nucleic Acid Synthesis .....................................................................................................................556 Fluoroquinolones......................................................................................................................................556 Rifamycins .............................................................................................................................................556 Trimethoprim and sulfonamides ......................................................................................................................557 TREATMENT OF NONTUBERCULOUS MYCOBACTERIAL INFECTIONS ....................................................................................557 Pulmonary ...............................................................................................................................................557 Mycobacterium avium complex ........................................................................................................................557 (i) Presentation of disease ...........................................................................................................................558 (ii) Cystic fibrosis ....................................................................................................................................559 (iii) MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis ..............................................................................................................560 Mycobacterium abscessus ..............................................................................................................................560 Mycobacterium chelonae...............................................................................................................................560 Mycobacterium fortuitum ..............................................................................................................................561 Mycobacterium immunogenum and hypersensitivity pneumonitis ....................................................................................561 Mycobacterium mucogenicum .........................................................................................................................561 Mycobacterium malmoense ............................................................................................................................561 Mycobacterium simiae..................................................................................................................................561 Mycobacterium szulgai..................................................................................................................................561 (continued) Address correspondence to Barbara A. Brown-Elliott, [email protected]. Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. doi:10.1128/CMR.05030-11 July 2012 Volume 25 Number 3 Clinical Microbiology Reviews p. 545–582 cmr.asm.org 545 Brown-Elliott et al. Mycobacterium terrae complex ........................................................................................................................561 Mycobacterium xenopi .................................................................................................................................562 Mycobacterium kansasii ................................................................................................................................562 Miscellaneous species .................................................................................................................................562 Surgery ...................................................................................................................................................562 Disseminated Disease ....................................................................................................................................563 Mycobacterium avium complex ........................................................................................................................563 Mycobacterium chelonae...............................................................................................................................563 Mycobacterium fortuitum ..............................................................................................................................563
Recommended publications
  • Rifalazil | Medchemexpress
    Inhibitors Product Data Sheet Rifalazil • Agonists Cat. No.: HY-105099 CAS No.: 129791-92-0 Molecular Formula: C₅₁H₆₄N₄O₁₃ • Molecular Weight: 941.07 Screening Libraries Target: DNA/RNA Synthesis; Bacterial Pathway: Cell Cycle/DNA Damage; Anti-infection Storage: 4°C, sealed storage, away from moisture * In solvent : -80°C, 6 months; -20°C, 1 month (sealed storage, away from moisture) SOLVENT & SOLUBILITY In Vitro DMSO : 8.33 mg/mL (8.85 mM; Need ultrasonic) Mass Solvent 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg Concentration Preparing 1 mM 1.0626 mL 5.3131 mL 10.6262 mL Stock Solutions 5 mM 0.2125 mL 1.0626 mL 2.1252 mL 10 mM --- --- --- Please refer to the solubility information to select the appropriate solvent. In Vivo 1. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 40% PEG300 >> 5% Tween-80 >> 45% saline Solubility: ≥ 2.2 mg/mL (2.34 mM); Clear solution 2. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in saline) Solubility: ≥ 2.2 mg/mL (2.34 mM); Clear solution BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY Description Rifalazil (KRM-1648; ABI-1648), a rifamycin derivative, inhibits the bacterial DNA-dependent RNA polymerase and kills bacterial cells by blocking off the β-subunit in RNA polymerase[1]. Rifalazil (KRM-1648; ABI-1648) is an antibiotic, exhibits high potency against mycobacteria, gram-positive bacteria, Helicobacter pylori, C. pneumoniae and C. trachomatis with MIC values from 0.00025 to 0.0025 μg/ml[3]. Rifalazil (KRM-1648; ABI-1648) has the potential for the treatment of Chlamydia infection, Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD), and tuberculosis (TB)[2].
    [Show full text]
  • EMA/CVMP/158366/2019 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use
    Ref. Ares(2019)6843167 - 05/11/2019 31 October 2019 EMA/CVMP/158366/2019 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use Advice on implementing measures under Article 37(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 on veterinary medicinal products – Criteria for the designation of antimicrobials to be reserved for treatment of certain infections in humans Official address Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 ● 1083 HS Amsterdam ● The Netherlands Address for visits and deliveries Refer to www.ema.europa.eu/how-to-find-us Send us a question Go to www.ema.europa.eu/contact Telephone +31 (0)88 781 6000 An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2019. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Introduction On 6 February 2019, the European Commission sent a request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for a report on the criteria for the designation of antimicrobials to be reserved for the treatment of certain infections in humans in order to preserve the efficacy of those antimicrobials. The Agency was requested to provide a report by 31 October 2019 containing recommendations to the Commission as to which criteria should be used to determine those antimicrobials to be reserved for treatment of certain infections in humans (this is also referred to as ‘criteria for designating antimicrobials for human use’, ‘restricting antimicrobials to human use’, or ‘reserved for human use only’). The Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) formed an expert group to prepare the scientific report. The group was composed of seven experts selected from the European network of experts, on the basis of recommendations from the national competent authorities, one expert nominated from European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), one expert nominated by European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), one expert with expertise on human infectious diseases, and two Agency staff members with expertise on development of antimicrobial resistance .
    [Show full text]
  • Mycobacterium Arupense Among the Isolates of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria from Human, Animal and Environmental Samples
    Veterinarni Medicina, 55, 2010 (8): 369–376 Original Paper Mycobacterium arupense among the isolates of non-tuberculous mycobacteria from human, animal and environmental samples M. Slany1, J. Svobodova2, A. Ettlova3, I. Slana1, V. Mrlik1, I. Pavlik1 1Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic 2Regional Institute of Public Health, Brno, Czech Republic 3BioPlus, s.r.o., Brno, Czech Republic ABSTRACT: Mycobacterium arupense is a non-tuberculous, potentially pathogenic species rarely isolated from humans. The aim of the study was to ascertain the spectrum of non-tuberculous mycobacteria within 271 sequenced mycobacterial isolates not belonging to M. tuberculosis and M. avium complexes. Isolates were collected between 2004 and 2009 in the Czech Republic and were examined within the framework of ecological studies carried out in animal populations infected with mycobacteria. A total of thirty-three mycobacterial species were identified. This report describes the isolation of M. arupense from the sputum of three human patients and seven different animal and environmental samples collected in the last six years in the Czech Republic: one isolate from leftover refrigerated organic dog food, two isolates from urine and clay collected from an okapi (Okapia johnstoni) and antelope bongo (Tragelaphus eurycerus) enclosure in a zoological garden, one isolate from the soil in an eagle’s nest (Haliaeetus albicilla) band two isolates from two common vole (Microtus arvalis) livers from one cattle farm. All isolates were identified by biochemical tests, morphology and 16S rDNA sequencing. Also, retrospective screening for M. arupense occurrence within the collected isolates is presented. Keywords: 16S rDNA sequencing; non-tuberculous mycobacteria; ecology Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiq- According to the commonly used Runyon clas- uitous in the environment and are responsible for sification scheme, NTM are categorized by growth several diseases in humans and/or animals known rate and pigmentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Anew Drug Design Strategy in the Liht of Molecular Hybridization Concept
    www.ijcrt.org © 2020 IJCRT | Volume 8, Issue 12 December 2020 | ISSN: 2320-2882 “Drug Design strategy and chemical process maximization in the light of Molecular Hybridization Concept.” Subhasis Basu, Ph D Registration No: VB 1198 of 2018-2019. Department Of Chemistry, Visva-Bharati University A Draft Thesis is submitted for the partial fulfilment of PhD in Chemistry Thesis/Degree proceeding. DECLARATION I Certify that a. The Work contained in this thesis is original and has been done by me under the guidance of my supervisor. b. The work has not been submitted to any other Institute for any degree or diploma. c. I have followed the guidelines provided by the Institute in preparing the thesis. d. I have conformed to the norms and guidelines given in the Ethical Code of Conduct of the Institute. e. Whenever I have used materials (data, theoretical analysis, figures and text) from other sources, I have given due credit to them by citing them in the text of the thesis and giving their details in the references. Further, I have taken permission from the copyright owners of the sources, whenever necessary. IJCRT2012039 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 284 www.ijcrt.org © 2020 IJCRT | Volume 8, Issue 12 December 2020 | ISSN: 2320-2882 f. Whenever I have quoted written materials from other sources I have put them under quotation marks and given due credit to the sources by citing them and giving required details in the references. (Subhasis Basu) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This preface is to extend an appreciation to all those individuals who with their generous co- operation guided us in every aspect to make this design and drawing successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Tariff Schedule 2
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. ABACAVIR 136470-78-5 ACIDUM LIDADRONICUM 63132-38-7 ABAFUNGIN 129639-79-8 ACIDUM SALCAPROZICUM 183990-46-7 ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACIDUM SALCLOBUZICUM 387825-03-8 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ACIFRAN 72420-38-3 ABAPERIDONUM 183849-43-6 ACIPIMOX 51037-30-0 ABARELIX 183552-38-7 ACITAZANOLAST 114607-46-4 ABATACEPTUM 332348-12-6 ACITEMATE 101197-99-3 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ACITRETIN 55079-83-9 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ACIVICIN 42228-92-2 ABETIMUSUM 167362-48-3 ACLANTATE 39633-62-0 ABIRATERONE 154229-19-3 ACLARUBICIN 57576-44-0 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ACLATONIUM NAPADISILATE 55077-30-0 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ACODAZOLE 79152-85-5 ABRINEURINUM 178535-93-8 ACOLBIFENUM 182167-02-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ACONIAZIDE 13410-86-1 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ACOTIAMIDUM 185106-16-5 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,097,607 B2 Cabana Et Al
    USO08097607B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,097,607 B2 Cabana et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jan. 17, 2012 (54) LOW DOSE RIFALAZIL COMPOSITIONS Emori et al., “Evaluation of in Vivo Therapeutic Efficacy of a New Benzoxazinorifamycin, KRM-1648, in SCID Mouse Model for Dis (76) Inventors: Bernard E. Cabana, Montgomery seminated Mycobacterium avium Complex Infection.” International Village, MD (US); Arthur F. Michaelis, Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 10(1):59 (1998). Devon, PA (US); Gary P. Magnant, Fujii et al., “In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Activities of KRM Topsfield, MA (US); Chalom B. 1648 and KRM-1657, New Rifamycin Derivatives.” Antimicrobial Sayada, Luxembourg (LU) Agents and Chemotherapy 38: 1118, (1994). Gidoh et al., “Bactericidal Action at Low Doses of a New Rifamycin (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this Derivative, 3'-hydroxy-5'-(4-isobutyl-1-piperazinyl) patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Benzoxazinorifamycin (KRM-1648) on Mycobacterium leprae U.S.C. 154(b) by 447 days. Inoculated into Ffootpads of Nude Mice.” Leprosy Review 63(4):319 This patent is Subject to a terminal dis (1992). claimer. Heep et al., “Detection of Rifabutin Resistance and Association of rpoB Mutation S with Resistance to Four Rifamycin Derivatives in Helicobacter pylori.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious (21) Appl. No.: 10/668,792 Diseases 21:143 (2002). Hirara et al., “In Vitro and in Vivo Activities of the (22) Filed: Sep. 23, 2003 Benezoxazinorifamycin KRM-1648 Against Mycobacterium tuber (65) Prior Publication Data culosis,” Antimocrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 39 (10):2295 (1995). US 2004/O15784.0 A1 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Communication
    BRIEF COMMUNICATION http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946201860006 Nontuberculous mycobacteria in milk from positive cows in the intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin test: implications for human tuberculosis infections Carmen Alicia Daza Bolaños1, Marília Masello Junqueira Franco1, Antonio Francisco Souza Filho2, Cássia Yumi Ikuta2, Edith Mariela Burbano-Rosero3, José Soares Ferreira Neto2, Marcos Bryan Heinemann2, Rodrigo Garcia Motta4, Carolina Lechinski de Paula1, Amanda Bonalume Cordeiro de Morais1, Simony Trevizan Guerra1, Ana Carolina Alves1, Fernando José Paganini Listoni1, Márcio Garcia Ribeiro1 ABSTRACT Although the tuberculin test represents the main in vivo diagnostic method used in the control and eradication of bovine tuberculosis, few studies have focused on the identification of mycobacteria in the milk from cows positive to the tuberculin test. The aim of this study was to identify Mycobacterium species in milk samples from cows positive to the comparative intradermal test. Milk samples from 142 cows positive to the comparative intradermal test carried out in 4,766 animals were aseptically collected, cultivated on Lowenstein-Jensen and Stonebrink media and incubated for up to 90 days. Colonies compatible with mycobacteria were stained by Ziehl-Neelsen to detect acid-fast bacilli, while to confirm the Mycobacterium genus, conventional PCR was performed. Fourteen mycobacterial strains were isolated from 12 cows (8.4%). The hsp65 gene sequencing identified M. engbaekii (n=5), M. arupense 1Universidade Estadual Paulista,
    [Show full text]
  • View of Results 1SGN the Overall Results of the Two Methods Are Summarized in M
    BMC Microbiology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Reliable identification of mycobacterial species by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis (PRA)-hsp65 in a reference laboratory and elaboration of a sequence-based extended algorithm of PRA-hsp65 patterns Erica Chimara1, Lucilaine Ferrazoli1, Suely Yoko Misuka Ueky1, Maria Conceição Martins1, Alan Mitchel Durham2, Robert D Arbeit3 and Sylvia Cardoso Leão*4 Address: 1Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 3Tufts University School of Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Boston, Massachusetts, USA and 4Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Email: Erica Chimara - [email protected]; Lucilaine Ferrazoli - [email protected]; Suely Yoko Misuka Ueky - [email protected]; Maria Conceição Martins - [email protected]; Alan Mitchel Durham - [email protected]; Robert D Arbeit - [email protected]; Sylvia Cardoso Leão* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 20 March 2008 Received: 17 October 2007 Accepted: 20 March 2008 BMC Microbiology 2008, 8:48 doi:10.1186/1471-2180-8-48 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/8/48 © 2008 Chimara et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) based on phenotypic tests is time-consuming, labor-intensive, expensive and often provides erroneous or inconclusive results.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions of Antimicrobial Drugs: a Systematic Review on Oxazolidinones, Rifamycines, Macrolides, Fluoroquinolones, and Beta-Lactams
    Pharmaceutics 2011, 3, 865-913; doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics3040865 OPEN ACCESS Pharmaceutics ISSN 1999-4923 www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmaceutics Review Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions of Antimicrobial Drugs: A Systematic Review on Oxazolidinones, Rifamycines, Macrolides, Fluoroquinolones, and Beta-Lactams Mathieu S. Bolhuis *, Prashant N. Panday, Arianna D. Pranger, Jos G. W. Kosterink and Jan-Willem C. Alffenaar Department of Hospital and Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; E-Mails: [email protected] (P.N.P.); [email protected] (A.D.P.); [email protected] (J.G.W.K.); [email protected] (J.-W.C.A.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-50-361-4071; Fax: +31-50-361-4078 Received: 15 October 2011; in revised form: 26 October 2011 / Accepted: 9 November 2011 / Published: 18 November 2011 Abstract: Like any other drug, antimicrobial drugs are prone to pharmacokinetic drug interactions. These drug interactions are a major concern in clinical practice as they may have an effect on efficacy and toxicity. This article provides an overview of all published pharmacokinetic studies on drug interactions of the commonly prescribed antimicrobial drugs oxazolidinones, rifamycines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactams, focusing on systematic research. We describe drug-food and drug-drug interaction studies in humans, affecting antimicrobial drugs as well as concomitantly administered drugs. Since knowledge about mechanisms is of paramount importance for adequate management of drug interactions, the most plausible underlying mechanism of the drug interaction is provided when available.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotics Targets, Mechanisms and Resistance 1St
    Edited by Claudio O. Gualerzi, Letizia Brandi, Attilio Fabbretti, and Cynthia L. Pon Antibiotics Related Titles Phoenix, D.A., Dennison, S., and Harris, F. Arya, D.P. (ed.) Antimicrobial Peptides Aminoglycoside Antibiotics From Chemical Biologyto Drug Discovery 2013 Print ISBN: 978-3-527-33263-2, also available in 2007 electronic formats Print ISBN: 978-0-471-74302-6, also available in electronic formats Skold,¨ O. Antibiotics and Antibiotic Tolmasky, M. and Bonomo, R. (eds.) Resistance Enzyme-Mediated Resistance to Antibiotics 2011 Print ISBN: 978-0-470-43850-3, also available in 2007 electronic formats Print ISBN: 978-1-555-81303-1 Selzer, P.M. (ed.) Antiparasitic and Antibacterial Drug Discovery From Molecular Targets to Drug Candidates 2009 Print ISBN: 978-3-527-32327-2, also available in electronic formats Edited by Claudio O. Gualerzi, Letizia Brandi, Attilio Fabbretti, and Cynthia L. Pon Antibiotics Targets, Mechanisms and Resistance The Editors All books published by Wiley-VCH are carefully produced. Nevertheless, authors, editors, and publisher do not warrant the Claudio O. Gualerzi information contained in these books, Laboratory of Genetics including this book, to be free of errors. Department of Biosciences and Readers are advised to keep in mind that Biotechnology statements, data, illustrations, procedural University of Camerino details or other items may inadvertently be 62032 Camerino inaccurate. Italy Letizia Brandi Library of Congress Card No.: applied for Laboratory of Genetics Department of Biosciences and British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Biotechnology Data University of Camerino A catalogue record for this book is available 62032 Camerino from the British Library. Italy Bibliographic information published by the Attilio Fabbretti Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Laboratory of Genetics The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Department of Biosciences and lists this publication in the Deutsche Biotechnology Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic University of Camerino data are available on the Internet at 62032 Camerino <http://dnb.d-nb.de>.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequency and Clinical Implications of the Isolation of Rare Nontuberculous Mycobacteria
    Kim et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2015) 15:9 DOI 10.1186/s12879-014-0741-7 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Frequency and clinical implications of the isolation of rare nontuberculous mycobacteria Junghyun Kim1, Moon-Woo Seong2, Eui-Chong Kim2, Sung Koo Han1 and Jae-Joon Yim1* Abstract Background: To date, more than 125 species of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) have been identified. In this study, we investigated the frequency and clinical implication of the rarely isolated NTM from respiratory specimens. Methods: Patients with NTM isolated from their respiratory specimens between July 1, 2010 and June 31, 2012 were screened for inclusion. Rare NTM were defined as those NTM not falling within the group of eight NTM species commonly identified at our institution: Mycobacterium avium, M. intracellulare, M. abscessus, M. massiliense, M. fortuitum, M. kansasii, M. gordonae, and M. peregrinum. Clinical, radiographic and microbiological data from patients with rare NTM were reviewed and analyzed. Results: During the study period, 73 rare NTM were isolated from the respiratory specimens of 68 patients. Among these, M. conceptionense was the most common (nine patients, 12.3%). The median age of the 68 patients with rare NTM was 68 years, while 39 of the patients were male. Rare NTM were isolated only once in majority of patient (64 patients, 94.1%). Among the four patients from whom rare NTM were isolated two or more times, only two showed radiographic aggravation caused by rare NTM during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Most of the rarely identified NTM species were isolated from respiratory specimens only once per patient, without concomitant clinical aggravation.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria: Epidemiological Pattern in a Reference Laboratory and Risk Factors Associated with Pulmonary Disease
    Epidemiol. Infect. (2017), 145, 515–522. © Cambridge University Press 2016 doi:10.1017/S0950268816002521 Non-tuberculous mycobacteria: epidemiological pattern in a reference laboratory and risk factors associated with pulmonary disease J. MENCARINI1,C.CRESCI2, M. T. SIMONETTI3,C.TRUPPA1, G. CAMICIOTTOLI2,4,M.L.FRILLI4,P.G.ROGASI5,S.VELOCI1, 2,4 3,6,7 1,5 M. PISTOLESI ,G.M.ROSSOLINI ,A.BARTOLONI AND F. BARTALESI5* 1 Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy 2 Pneumology Unit, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy 3 Tuscany Regional Reference Centre for Mycobacteria, Microbiology and Virology Unit, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy 4 Section of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy 5 Unit of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy 6 Section of Microbiology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy 7 Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy Received 8 April 2016; Final revision 7 October 2016; Accepted 9 October 2016; first published online 2 November 2016 SUMMARY The diseases caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), in both AIDS and non-AIDS populations, are increasingly recognized worldwide. Although the American Thoracic Society published the guidelines for diagnosis of NTM pulmonary disease (NTM-PD), the diagnosis is still difficult. In the first part of the study, we collected data on NTM isolates in the Mycobacteriology Laboratory of Careggi Hospital (Florence, Italy) and analysed the epidemiological data of NTM isolates. Then, to analyse the risk factors associated to NTM-PD, we studied the presence of ATS/IDSA criteria for NTM-PD in patients who had at least one positive respiratory sample for NTM and were admitted to the Infectious Disease Unit and the Section of Respiratory Medicine.
    [Show full text]