The Health of the Nation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Health of the Nation The Health of the Nation The Health of the Nation.indd 1 27/11/2014 10:52 The Health of the Nation.indd 2 27/11/2014 10:52 The Health of the Nation NHS in Peril David Owen Methuen The Health of the Nation.indd 3 27/11/2014 10:52 Published by Methuen & Co Methuen & Co 35 Hospital Fields Road York YO10 4DZ www.methuen.co.uk First published 2014 1 Copyright © David Owen, 2014 David Owen has asserted his rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988 to be identified as the author of this work. All rights reserved Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher of this book Typeset by SX Composing DTP, Rayleigh, Essex Printed by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY ISBN: 978-0-413-77772-0 Ebook ISBN: 978-0-413-77773-7 A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library The Health of the Nation.indd 4 27/11/2014 10:52 To Tessa, Sylvan, Cai and Elizabeth, in the hope and expectation that the NHS will serve them as well as it has served my generation since 1948 The Health of the Nation.indd 5 27/11/2014 10:52 The Health of the Nation.indd 6 27/11/2014 10:52 Contents Acknowledgements ix Introduction xi Action Sheet xxxi Chapter 1 The Hung Parliament of 2010 1 Chapter 2 Fatally Flawed NHS Legislation 19 Chapter 3 A People’s Commission 56 Chapter 4 NHS Marketisation – EU and US 114 Chapter 5 SOS: Save Our Surgeries 161 Chapter 6 A One-nation NHS 196 Annexes: A: National Health Service (Amended Duties and Powers) Bill [HL] 261 B: National Health Service (Amended Duties and Powers) Bill (‘the Efford Bill’) 268 C: Response to the Efford Bill by Allyson Pollock et al. 287 D: Translated text of German Constitutional Court Ruling, paras 395–7 296 E: Charter 2010: Two Extracts 299 The Health of the Nation.indd 7 27/11/2014 10:52 The Health of the Nation.indd 8 27/11/2014 10:52 Acknowledgements I have been fortunate to be able to draw extensively from two published reports: firstly Nicholas Timmins,Never Again? The Story of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 – A Study in Coalition Government and Policy Making (Institute for Government, 2012), and secondly Olivia O’Sullivan and Elizabeth Woodcraft (eds), Report of the Lewisham People’s Commission, available online at www.savelewishamhospital.com/peoples-commission- report. I have also taken a long quote about the People’s March from Jarrow in the summer of 2014 from the Staggers blog. I have deliberately used on many occasions fairly long quotes from speeches, articles and letters of other people because I wanted to convey a sense that the reinstatement of the NHS is a people’s demand. Many people have helped me, too numerous to mention, since I first began as a medical student in 1956 and as an MP in 1966; to all of them I owe a huge debt. This book, however, could never have been completed without the support of Peter Tummons at my publisher Methuen, Jonathan Wadman, my editor, and Maggie Smart, who has worked with me since 1977. To them I owe a special debt of gratitude. ix The Health of the Nation.indd 9 27/11/2014 10:52 The Health of the Nation.indd 10 27/11/2014 10:52 Introduction The major consequence of the 2012 Health and Social Care Act has been how it views health care in England as a business rather than a service. The key political challenge today for many people in England is how to persuade politicians that they are wrong to believe that health should be viewed in this way, and to explain how we can sensibly reinstate the fundamentals of the NHS that are being dismantled in England, fundamentals that elsewhere in the United Kingdom remain intact and widely supported, as we saw during the Scottish referendum. Along with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have retained an undoubtedly recognisable NHS, albeit in slightly different forms. Only in England does the threat exist that the NHS will be unrecognisable by 2020 if the 2012 legislation is not repealed in substance after the May 2015 general election. But this has profound implications for the UK. The underlying reasons that make the original concept of the NHS worth fighting for are clear, but not often stated, perhaps because they go to the ethical and moral basis of xi The Health of the Nation.indd 11 27/11/2014 10:52 David Owen the way many UK citizens wish to live their lives. There is a natural reserve which makes many people reluctant to talk about these values in a political setting. But at the next election we must drop that reserve and fight not just an ideological battle but a struggle for the heart. Politics is not solely about power; it is also about people and how to make power serve the people. In 1952 the founder of the NHS wrote these words, which sum up the timeless moral case for the reinstatement of a recognisable NHS in England: ‘Society becomes more wholesome, more serene and spiritually healthier if it knows that its citizens have at the back of their consciousness the knowledge that not only themselves but also their fellows have access when ill, to the best that medical skill can provide.’1 ‘Wholesome’ is a wonderful word and so is ‘serene’. To live without the fear of being unable to afford medical care is a blessing, but one which has only been with us since 1948 in the UK. The market does not have to penetrate every nook and cranny of our day-to-day life. In the nineteenth century the philosopher Thomas Carlyle warned of the marketisation that was starting to feed through into all parts of society: We have profoundly forgotten everywhere that cash- payment is not the sole relation of human beings; we think nothing of doubting, that it absolves and liquidates all engagements of man. ‘My starving workers?’ answers the rich mill-owner. ‘Did I not hire them fairly in the market? 1 Aneurin Bevan, In Place of Fear (Heinemann, 1952). xii The Health of the Nation.indd 12 27/11/2014 10:52 The Health of the Nation Did I not pay them, to the last sixpence, the sum covenanted for? What have I to do with them more? 2 The social history of the NHS makes clear that it would be ‘an error to regard the NHS as a spontaneous creation’. The cumbersome National Health Insurance (NHI) administration established in 1911 supplied minimum financial relief during sickness and a ‘panel doctor’ service for the low paid on the basis of weekly deductions of income for the so-called health stamp.3 But many were not covered by this insurance. There was nothing for those excluded other than the charity of the doctor or a hospital. The Dawson report of 1920 pointed the way but many slum dwellers had totally inadequate healthcare, if any, and lived in conditions of Dickensian squalor. The Second World War brought the Emergency Medical Service, the Beveridge report and the 1944 White Paper outlining the provisions of the projected NHS: a resolve emerged in wartime within the British people that when peace came there would be a different and better system of healthcare for everyone. In 2014, the political writer David Marquand wrote about the profound dangers to the NHS of what amounts ‘to a transition from a managed market to an unmanaged one’.4 What is more complicated about this market and more important ‘has to do with the mentality and rhetoric of the marketisers and with the social vision they encapsulate’. At the heart of all marketisation and commercialisation of the NHS lies the ‘totemic term 2 Thomas Carlyle, Past and Present (Chapman & Hall, 1843). 3 Charles Webster, The National Health Service: A Political History (Oxford University Press, 1998). 4 David Marquand, Mammon’s Kingdom: An Essay on Britain, Now (Allen Lane, 2014). xiii The Health of the Nation.indd 13 27/11/2014 10:52 David Owen “choice”: free choice by unconnected individuals, satisfying individual wants through market competition’. Healthcare, whether public or private, in a very real sense is infinite: money can be – and in many countries is – poured into healthcare by those who can afford it. Money for the NHS is a public choice, but it is all relative to what we choose to spend on education, housing, welfare, defence, all legitimate demands. Healthcare, if publicly provided, inevitably has to be constrained. That rationing process within the NHS is flexible, professional and democratically accountable. It is decided by Parliament through the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Secretary of State for Health and Cabinet. By democratic choice it is not done by a market or by insurance premiums. Voters could have chosen a different system – they exist in many parts of the world – but no major political party has ever felt brave or foolish enough to put that choice to them. It was not, as this book will show, a choice put to the electorate in 2010 by either the Conservatives or Liberal Democrats. The unknowing nature of choice when applied to health- care dramatically demonstrates the problem that many politicians and journalists have when they come to make quick appreciations, half-decisions and slick prescriptions for the NHS.
Recommended publications
  • Who's Progressive Now?
    Who’s progressive now? Greg Clark MP Jeremy Hunt MP Who’s progressive now? Greg Clark MP Jeremy Hunt MP 1 Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Peter Franklin, Joanna Garner, Adam Smith and David O’Leary for their help in preparing this booklet. 2 Chapter 1: Progressive politics Introduction – whatever happened to the ‘Progressive Consensus’? During the last five years, Gordon Brown and his retinue of younger advisers have been on a quest – to define a political project that will in turn define his premiership. It has proved to be an arid task. Smith Institute seminars in 11 Downing Street have cast around in vain for a purpose that could be described coherently, let alone one that could be said to define the Brown vision. In the end, the task has been abandoned. Three events in the space of three weeks signalled the emptiness of Labour’s intellectual larder. First - the new Prime Minister’s barren conference speech in Brighton in September revealed that the preceding groundwork of seminars, symposia and speeches had offered up nothing usable. Next, the cancellation of the expected election, which was explained as allowing the Prime Minister another two years to set out his vision, was in fact a recognition that there was no vision to set out that would survive the scrutiny of an election campaign. Then came the intellectual surrender of the following week, in which Conservative reforms to inheritance tax set the agenda for what was, in effect, the first Budget of the Brown premiership. With no new idea that did not come from the Opposition, Alistair Darling’s statement signalled the end of the new regime’s ambition to forge an agenda of its own.
    [Show full text]
  • RIDDLE, MYSTERY and ENIGMA[1]
    ADVANCE INFORMATION SHEET / HAUS PUBLISHING RIDDLE, MYSTERY, AND ENIGMA Two Hundred Years of British-Russian Relations DAVID OWEN £20 18 October 2021 History ISBN 978-1-913368-39-5 Hardback | Royal, 234x153mm | 304 pp • Former Foreign Secretary David Owen has written widely on diplomatic history and geopolitics. Henry Kissinger described his book on the diplomatic prelude to the First World War, The Hidden Perspective, as ‘essential reading for contemporary statesmen’. • The book comes at a time when relations between Putin’s Russia and Britain are at a historic low, after the Salisbury poisoning and as Russia seeks to reassert its power on the world stage. • Exploring military, geopolitical, and diplomatic history, Riddle, Mystery, and Enigma is the first full account of the historical relationship between Britain and Russia. Britain’s relationship with the giant on the edge of the continent, Russia, are surprisingly under explored. In a panorama spanning two hundred years, former foreign secretary David Owen reveals how relations between the two countries have ebbed and flowed – and why they have seemingly reached a new low in recent years. When the two countries formed a cautiously pragmatic alliance with the French and fought alongside one another at Navarino in 1827 – a battle that ultimately swung the balance of the Greek War of Independence – it was overwhelmingly the work of one man: the prime minister, George Canning. His death shortly before the battle brought about a volte-face that would see the countries fight on opposing sides in the Crimea and marked a freeze in relations as the countries jostled for power during the decades of the Great Game.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Alan Campbell Interviewed by Jane Barder 19/1/96 Typed by Jeremy Wiltshire 10/6/96
    Contents of interview Entry to Foreign Office, 1946. p 2 Service under Lord Killearn, Singapore; marriage, 1947-48. pp 2-4 Private Secretary to PUS William Strang, 1950-53. pp 5-6 Head of Chancery, Rome, 1952-55: Trieste problem; pp 6-8 Communist threat. Head of Chancery, Peking, 1955-57: role of Head of Chancery; pp 8-12 relations with Chinese; recognition problem; anti-British demonstrations at time of Suez; schooling of children. Imperial Defence College, 1958. pp 12-13 News Department, 1958-60; comments on Selwyn Lloyd, pp 13-17 Hoyer-Millar, Macmillan and aftermath of Suez. Counsellor and Head of Chancery, New York (UN), 1961-65; pp 17-23 death of Hammarskjold; anti-Imperialist feeling; Lord Caradon (political appointees to diplomatic posts). Comments on Alec Douglas-Home. p 23 Western European Department at FO, 1965-67. pp 23-24 Counsellor and Head of Chancery, Paris, 1967-69; appointment pp 24-25 to post; EEC. Ambassador to Addis Ababa, 1969-72; Haile Selassie; Idi Amin; pp 25-28 growth of sedition in Ethiopia. Deputy Under-Secretary, FO, 1974-76; effective “Political pp 28-32 Director”; foreign policy talks with other EEC members; commercial competition with EEC states; co-ordination of EEC foreign policy. Concluding comments on: international civil servants; women pp 32-35 in diplomatic service; merger of CRO and FO; spending cuts in late 1970’s; David Owen as Foreign Secretary. 1 Sir Alan Campbell Interviewed by Jane Barder 19/1/96 Typed by Jeremy Wiltshire 10/6/96 An interview between Sir Alan Campbell and Jane Barder, at his flat in London.
    [Show full text]
  • The Passage of the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill
    Concepts of Representation and The Passage of The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill Dr Sarah Childs First Draft for Journal of Legislative Studies Middlesex University White Hart Lane London N17 8HR 07950-933371 [email protected] Abstract The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill was introduced to the Commons in October 2001, gaining Royal Assent in February 2002. The Bill followed the decrease in the numbers of women elected in the 2001 General Election. It permits political parties to introduce positive action in the selection of candidates. The Bill received cross party support and had an easy passage through both Houses of Parliament. This article examines the arguments employed by MPs and Peers in support of the legislation, informed by feminist concepts of representation. Arguments associated with the claim that women have a different political style received little support. There was greater discussion of arguments based on symbolic representation and substantive representation, although many MPs were reluctant to make the strong claim that women’s substantive representation is dependent upon women’s presence. However, the most widely supported argument in favour of the Bill was the justice argument, namely, that women are currently being denied equal opportunities in the parties’ selection processes. Introduction1 The 2001 General Election saw 118 (17.9%) women MPs returned to the House of Commons. This was the first time in over twenty years that the numbers of women MPs had decreased (Lovenduski 2001). Yet it was not unexpected. Unlike 1997 when the Labour Party had implemented all women shortlists (AWS), no political party adopted positive discrimination measures for 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Groups, Governance and the Development of UK Al- Cohol Policy: an Adversarial Policy Communities Ap- Proach
    ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Groups, governance and the development of UK al- cohol policy: an adversarial policy communities ap- proach https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40473/ Version: Full Version Citation: Barrett, Gareth Paul (2020) Groups, governance and the de- velopment of UK alcohol policy: an adversarial policy communities ap- proach. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email Groups, governance and the development of UK alcohol policy: An Adversarial Policy Communities Approach Gareth Paul Barrett A thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Politics Birkbeck, University of London January 2020 1 Declaration of Work I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the University of London is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. 2 Abstract The governance of UK alcohol policy looks like a textbook case of decision-making by a closed community of policymakers and industry insiders, but this thesis challenges this view. Drawing on Jordan and Richardson’s policy communities approach and Dudley and Richardson’s later work on adversarial policy communities, it examines the complex development of UK alcohol policy using archival sources, government and pressure group reports, news releases and historic media coverage going back over a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health the Vision and the Challenge
    THE ROCK CARLING FELLOWSHIP 1997 Public Health The vision and the challenge THE ROCK CARLING FELLOWSHIP 1997 PUBLIC HEALTH The vision and the challenge The pursuit of public health can have no finality... The problems of public health are changing rapidly with increasing medical knowledge and changes in social and economic conditions, the age distribution of the population and the outlook of the people. Sixth Annual Report of the Department of Health for Scotland 1934 Walter W Holland CBE, FRCP, FFPHM LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science London AND Susie Stewart DL, MA, HON MFPHM Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow Glasgow Published by The Nuffield Trust 59 New Cavendish Street, London WIM 7RD ISBN 1-902089-10-3 © Nuffield Trust 1998 Publications Committee Sir Derek Mitchell, KCB, cvo Professor John Ledingham, DM, FRCP John Wyn Owen, CB Designed by Benjamin Rowntree Reports Limited PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY BIDDLES & CO The Rock Carling Fellowship commemorates the late Sir Ernest Rock Carling for many years a governing Trustee and Chairman of the Medical Advisory Committee of the Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust. It was stipulated that each holder of the Fellowship will seek to review in a monograph the state of knowledge and activity in one of the fields in which Sir Ernest had been particularly interested, and which is within the purposes of the Trust. The arrangements provide that the monograph will be introduced by a public lecture given at a recognised Medical Teaching Centre in the United
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Milburn Interviewed the Real Reason for the Misery of Work
    PovertyJournal of the Child Poverty Action Group • Issue 147 • Winter 2014 Alan Milburn interviewed The real reason for the misery of work assessments How can we reduce child poverty without improving its prevention? Policy publications and CPAG briefings and reports from CPAG consultation responses The following reports can all be downloaded from Read these and more consultation responses and www.cpag.org.uk/policy-reports briefings at www.cpag.org.uk/briefings-responses Independent Review of JSA Sanctions: CPAG’s Let’s All Have Lunch! , September 2013 response , January 2014 Childcare and Maternal Employment in Submission to the Work and Pensions Committee London , September 2013 Inquiry into Housing Costs Support , October 2013 The Cost of a Child in 2013 , August 2013 Submission to the ‘Tax-free Childcare’ Will Universal Credit Work? Consultation , October 2013 Written by CPAG for the TUC, May 2013 Localisation of the Social Fund: countdown to The Double Lockout: how low-income families change , March 2013 will be locked out of fair living standards, January CPAG’s Response to the Child Poverty 2013 Measurement Consultation , February 2013 Ending Child Poverty by 2020 Judicial Review: proposals for reform. CPAG’s Progress made and lessons learned response to the Ministry of Justice consultation, Edited by Lindsay Judge January 2013 96 pages 978 1 906076 82 5 2012 £10.00 CPAG Briefing on Welfare Benefits Uprating Bill, Young People’s Thoughts on Child Poverty January 2013 Policy , December 2012 CPAG Briefing for Autumn Statement 2012, December 2012 We Can Work It Out: parental employment in London , November 2012 Food Poverty in London , October 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Hertford College News
    Hertford College News Issue 24, 2013 Bridge Centenary Special David Stuart: Improved vaccine The importance of being an intern 50723 Aug 13Issue24 v3.indd 1 07/08/2013 12:28 Contents 3 Principal’s Column: Sustaining openness 4 Development News: Bridge Centenary Celebrations 5 Development News: From the Members’ and Development Office 5 Economics Fellowship Fundraising: Update 6 Alumni Events 8 College News: Hertford at a glance 10 Hertford Matters: The long path towards an improved vaccine 12 Bridge Centenary: Sermons in stones 13 Bridge Centenary: Notes from the architect 14 Bridge Centenary: Bridge memories 16 Hertford Matters: The importance of being an intern 14 18 Student Showcase 6 20 Dates For Your Diary Hertford College News is published by the Members’ and Development Office for members and friends of the College. The opinions expressed are those of the writers and not necessarily the official views of Hertford College. 10 Editors: Anna Baskerville and Emma Pritchard Layout & design: Anna Baskerville 8 Cover photo: Phil Kelly Produced by: Members’ and Development Office Hertford College Oxford OX1 3BW T: +44 (0) 1865 279428 E: [email protected] W: www.hertford.ox.ac.uk Hertford College is a registered charity: number 1137527 12 SATURDAY 28TH SEPTEMBER 2013 Bridge Centenary Party Food, Drink and Live Music! For more information please visit www.hertford.ox.ac.uk/bridge100 Contents 2 50723 Aug 13Issue24 v3.indd 2 07/08/2013 12:28 The essence of innovation is serendipity. It is the chance encounter, remark or challenge that triggers the innovative connection between Sustaining openness previously unconnected ideas to produce a new thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Eu Social Market and Social Policy
    EU SOCIAL MARKET AND SOCIAL POLICY The SMF at twenty -one Rt Hon Lord Owen CH Copyright © Social Market Foundation, 2010 EU SOCIAL MARKET AND SOCIAL POLICY The SMF at twenty -one Rt Hon Lord Owen CH FIRST PUBLISHED BY The Social Market Foundation, March 2010 11 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QB Copyright © The Social Market Foundation, 2010 The moral right of the authors has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. THE SOCIAL MARKET FOUNDATION The Foundation’s main activity is to commission and publish original papers by independent academic and other experts on key topics in the economic and social fields, with a view to stimulating public discussion on the performance of markets and the social framework within which they operate. The Foundation is a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee. It is independent of any political party or group and is financed by the sale of publications and by voluntary donations from individuals, organisations and companies. The views expressed in publications are those of the authors and do not represent a corporate opinion of the Foundation. CHAIRMAN David Lipsey (Lord Lipsey of Tooting Bec) DIRECTOR Ian Mulheirn MEMB ERS OF THE BOARD Viscount (Tom) Chandos Gavyn Davies Daniel Franklin Martin Ivens Graham Mather Brian Pomeroy ABOUT THE AUTHOR RT HON LORD OWEN CH David Owen was a Member of Parliament for 26 years from 1966-92.
    [Show full text]
  • Credit Where It's Due How to Revive Bank Lending to British Small And
    November 2011 Credit WWWhereWhere IIIt’sIt’s DDDueDueueue How to revive bank lending to British Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Will Hutton and Kenneth Peasnell The Big Innovation Centre is an initiative of The Work Foundation and Lancaster University. Launched in September 2011, it brings together a range of companies, trusts, universities and public bodies to research and propose practical reforms with the ambition of making the UK a global open innovation hub as part of the urgent task of rebalancing and growing the UK economy, and with the vision of building a world-class innovation and investment ecosystem by 2025. For further details please visit www.biginnovationcentre.com Introduction and Summary The short-run objective: to increase the probability that funds released into the banking system by quantitative easing more directly influence both the risk appetite of banks for lending to small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), along with their capability to lend rather than being hoarded, used to refinance investment banking activities, or simply disappearing out of the country into overseas lending. The longer-run opportunity: to create an enduring mechanism that will encourage banks to increase lending to the kinds of innovative SMEs that are under-nourished by the current banking system but essential if the UK is to grow and rebalance its economy (Hutton and Nightingale, 2011). The proposal: for the Treasury to create Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) that will purchase high-quality SME debt originated by individual banks, and for the SPV to issue tranches of debt in turn, in the form of asset-backed securities (ABSs) with decreasing orders of claim on its portfolio of assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report
    R YouGov/ Sunday Times Survey Results YouGov Sample Size: 1755 Fieldwork: 10th - 11th April 2008 For detailed results, click here % Headline Voting Intention [Excluding Don't Knows and Wouldn't Votes] Con 44 Lab 28 Lib Dem 17 Other 11 Do you think Gordon Brown is doing well or badly as prime minister? Very well 2 Fairly well 26 Fairly badly 37 Very badly 28 Don’t know 7 Do you think David Cameron is doing well or badly as Conservative leader? Very well 7 Fairly well 44 Fairly badly 27 Very badly 11 Don’t know 11 Do you think Nick Clegg is doing well or badly as leader of the Liberal Democrats? Very well 1 Fairly well 25 Fairly badly 24 Very badly 11 Don’t know 38 Do you think house prices in your area will rise or fall over the next 12 months? Rise by more than 10% 2 Rise by less than 10% 10 TOTAL RISE 12 Stay about the same 28 Fall by less than 10% 41 Fall by more than 10% 13 TOTAL FALL 54 Don’t know 6 Over the next 12 months do you think Britain's economy will... Grow at a faster rate than over the past 12 months 1 Grow at about the same rate 5 Grow more slowly 35 Not grow at all 28 Go into recession 26 Don't know 6 1 © 2008 YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved www.yougov.com R % YouGov How much do you trust Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling to lead Britain through the present financial crisis? Trust a lot 4 Trust to some extent 25 Do not trust much 30 Do not trust at all 36 Don’t know 6 Thinking about Prime Minister Gordon Brown which of the following qualities do you think he has? [Please tick all that apply.] Sticks to what he believes
    [Show full text]