The Italian Fascism 293
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Nicolodi: The Italian Fascism 293 En Amérique Latine,les musiques›nationales‹obéissaient àdes sollicitations idéologi- quesfortdifférenciées pendantles années trente.Les Bachianas Brasileiras de Villa-Lôbos, allianceconstruiteentre le folklore brésilien et le ›retouràBach‹,furentécrites en parallè- le avecses pièces de propagande pour la dictaturepopuliste de GetúlioVargas26.Aumême moment,Silvestre Revueltas, militantdelaLigadeEscritoresyArtistasRevolucionarios composait,enmarge desmanifestationspubliquesanti-fascistesetdesolidaritéinterna- tionale, despiècescomme Janitzio, Sensemayá ou HomenajeaFedericoGarcíaLorca,dans lesquelles lesréférencesàdes éléments populaires locaux soutiennentundiscours musical quisynthétiselaquête identitaire en dehors desstéréotypes ›nationalistes‹ et l’exigence deslangagesmusicauxavancés de sontemps.27 Fiamma Nicolodi (Florence) The ItalianFascism I. Afterhis ascent to power in 1922,BenitoMussolinitookchargeofthe variousmusical trends of that time:Verismo (Francesco Cilea, UmbertoGiordano, Pietro Mascagni,Ric- cardo Zandonai), Futurismo(FrancescoBalilla Pratella,Luigi Russolo,SilvioMix,Franco Casavola)and theso-called Generazionedel 1880 (FrancoAlfano, AlfredoCasella,Gian FrancescoMalipiero, Ildebrando Pizzetti,OttorinoRespighi).The management of music wasled by Mussoliniwithabsoluteindifferencetowards onetrend or another. Duringthe firstyears,the primeministerwas in effect notworried about specific issues of styleorcon- tents. Insteadheconcentratedonobtainingthe assent of themostprestigious musicians (composersand performers), with an ›instrumental‹ idea of artfor politicalpurposes,anidea that supposedly wouldcontributetostrengthening theimage of fascisminItaly andabroad.1 Mussolini’sstatementsof1923, afew months afterhis ascent to power,showvagueness andnationalistic faith(inheritedfromthe past), butatthe same time aimatreassuringin- 26 Cf.entre autres, Heitor Villa-Lôbos, Amúsicanacionalistanogoverno GetulioVargas,Rio de Janeiro 1937;Simon Wright, Villa-Lobos,OxfordetNew York 1992. 27 Cf.entre autres, SilvestreRevueltas, SilvestreRevueltas porélmismo,México1989; JulioEstrada,»La obra política de SilvestreRevueltas«, inédit,1998; PeterGarland, In search of SilvestreRevueltas,Santa Fe 1991;CoriúnAharonián,Mariano Etkin, GracielaParaskevaídis,»SilvestreRevueltas«, Dossier, dans: Lulú 2, BuenosAires 1991,p.32–53. 1 Renzo De Felice, Mussolini il duce, Torino1974, p. 107; Giovanni Belardelli, »Ilfascismoel’orga- nizzazione dellacultura«, in: Guerre efascismo1914–1943,ed. by Giovanni Sabbatucci andVittorio Vidotto (= Storia d’Italia 4),Bari1997, p. 457. 294 Symposien A: Neue Musik in totalitären Staaten, 1930 bis 1989/90 tellectualsand artistsonthe basisthatthe regimewould notadopt a»Stateart«.2 Since 1925 thetotalitarianswing of fascismgainsstrength, andasfar as thearts areconcerned, in 1928 theDuceexplainshis intentiontosafeguard »the diversity of temperaments andof artists« andnot to aimatapatentlypoliticized artistic production.Suchstatementsmarked asignificant differencebetween thefascist dictatorship andthe Soviet or Nazi dictatorship andwould prove to be awinning strategy in gainingthe supportofpeoplesuchasintellec- tualsorartists who, sincethe beginning, appear to be amongthe leastsubmissive. On theother hand,oppositefactionsshowedthe twocontrasting aspectsthatalwaysexis- tedinthe culture of fascism(thetraditionalist, theembodimentofwhich wasthe bossRo- bertoFarinacci,and themodernist,led by theministerGiuseppeBottai). Theseaspects clashed on more than oneoccasionlooking foranofficiallegitimation, that however was nevertobegranted. Thecaseofthe Manifesto of 1932 is emblematic.Ten subscribersbelonging to different politicallines –distinguished composers, such as Pizzetti,Respighi, Zandonai,the presi- dentofthe SindacatoNazionale Fascista Musicisti(National FascistUnion of Musicians), thedirectorofthe ConservatoriodiFirenze,the critic of Il popolod’Italia,anewspaper foundedbyMussolini–intendedtosupport fascistmusic characterized by ›Italic‹ melody and›melodrama‹,against thosewho letthemselvesbeinfluenced by foreignexperiences (»objectivism«,»expressionism«, »atonaland pluritonalhonkings«, as thedocumentscorn- fullyspecified). Thetargets of this controversy were,asitiswellknown,Casella andMali- piero, themostdedicated to thecause of Europeanmodernism.3 Theintelligentsia (Luigi Pirandello,Massimo Bontempelli,etc.) supportedthe twoattacked composers, butthiscon- troversy didnot actuallyleave anyvictims on thebattlefield:the regimedid nottakesides, suggestingthatall theopponents were vaguelyright. As amatteroffact, theproject of a›new‹ art–asexpressed by theDucein1926–capable of harmonizingtradition andmodernity,was intentionallyambiguous,sothateveryone couldunderstandand fulfillittheir ownway.4 Thestrategyoftryingtokeepinwithbothsides –adopted also in thepracticeofpro- motions, patronage, audiences, inevitable photographic portraitsofthe Duce inscribed to musiciansbelonging to oppositefactions, personallyhandled by Mussoliniand by his office –turned outtobeone more effectivetooltogratify andbindmusicians,critics and performers to power in awell-calculated game of flattery andcorruption. Whereas in 1927 2 Benito Mussolini, »Allamostradel ›Novecento‹«, 26th March1923, in: Operaomnia,vol.19, ed.by Edoardo andDuilioSusmel,Firenze 1956,p.187–188:»Dichiaro cheèlungi da me l’ideadiincoraggiare qualchecosache possa assomigliare all’artedistato.L’arterientra nella sferadell’individuo. Lo statoha un solo dovere:quellodinon sabotarla, di farcondizioniumane agli artisti, di incoraggiarlidal puntodi vistaartistico enazionale.« (»Ideclarethatfar from me is theideaofencouraging somethingresembling aState art. Artbelongs in theindividualsphere. TheState hasonlyone duty:not to sabotage art, to make humanconditionsfor artists, to encouragethemfromthe artistic andnationalstandpoint.«) 3 The Manifesto waspublished on 17 December 1932 in thenewspapers Corriere dellasera, Il popolod’Ita- lia and La Stampa;the othersignatories were:Alberto Gasco, Riccardo Pick-Mangiagalli, GennaroNapoli andGuido Zuffellato.For an analysis of the Manifesto,see:FiammaNicolodi, Musica emusicisti nelven- tennio fascista,Fiesole andFirenze 1984,p.140–149. 4 Mussolini, Operaomnia,vol.22, 1957,p.230. Nicolodi: The Italian Fascism 295 Mascagni,asamemberofthe older generation,was chosen to represent Italianmusic in Vienna, on theoccasionofthe celebrations forthe centenaryofBeethoven’s death, for theyounger Alfano theDucearrangedinthe same year,inhis ownresidence, thepreview performanceofthe 2ndQuartet. Themimetic attitude of Mussolini, amateurviolinistand manneredmusic connoisseur àlapage,personallywriting (orrevising) theprograms of theconcerts he wasgoing to at- tend,welcoming patronages andfunding at festivals, ensnared notonlymostItalian musi- cians, criticsand musicologists, butalsomanyforeigners. Edward J. Dent,president of the InternationalSociety of ContemporaryMusic,after the1928Siena festivalofthe Society addressed aletterofthanks to Mussolini,inwhich he declaredtobeoverwhelmed by the »new imprint[…] impressed by Your Excellencyonthe life of this wonderfulNation«.5 Igor Stravinskij, whowas wellknown as aconservativecomposer,was received by theDuceon several occasions andgavehim gifts, describedMussolinias»thesaviour of Italyand […] of Europe«.6 ThecriticWilli Reich,advocateofthe ›Schönbergkreis‹ (aswellasthe only translator into German of Mussolini’s Scrittiediscorsi), reportedfromanaudiencegranted to himin1934–where he presented theDucewithhis avant-garde revue 23 –the »erstaun- licheFachkenntnisse« of the»gütigenund liebenswürdigenMenschenMussolini«7. To reducethismattertoessentials, it is notwrong anyway to divide fascistmusical policy roughly into twodecades:the firstmoretolerantofmodernistic choicesand exchanges with foreigncountries,orevenencouraging them;the second characterized by conformism, andbydemagogic andpatentlyautarchic positions. Significant of thefirst yearswas thepretentiousstatement of 20th-century faithgrant- ed by Mussolinionthe occasionofthe firstevent devoted to contemporaryItalian instru- mental music, under thepatronage of theprime ministerand funded by him: theExhibit of 20th-century MusicinItaly (Bologna, 1927). Anothereffective watershedbetween the twosides of thefascist period is theirregularityofthe measures endorsing music, promul- gatedinthe firstdecade, measures,moreover,scarcelyinnovativewithrespect to thepre- viousdecade,ifcomparedtothe largeamountoflegislative measures of thefollowing decade,meant to regulateand putunder thecontrol of theState both musicalinstitutions andmusical life. When theInspectorateofthe Theatrewas establishedin1935(from 1937,HeadOffice forTheatre andMusic at theMinistryofPopularCulture)somepreviouslypassedinitia- 5 Letter of Edward J. Dent to Mussolini15September 1928:»In thecharming andpeacefulenviron- ment,where ourmeeting took place, in theatmosphereofliberalityand balancethatconstantlysur- roundedus, not only didwefeelthe poetry andbeautytraditional of theItalian spirit,but thenew imprint, too,impressed by Your Excellency on thelifeofthiswonderful Nation« (Roma, Archivio Cen- traledello Stato, PCM 1934 –193614.2.1955). 6 This statementwas grantedtothe critic AlbertoGasco,onthe occasionofanaudienceatPalazzo Venezia; see AlbertoGasco,»Strawinsky eilFascismo«,in: Da CimarosaaStrawinsky,Roma1939, p. 142; forthe giftsoffered to theDuce(such as thesecondvolume of Chroniques de ma vie,agolden medaland thescore of Duoconcertant) andmoregenerallyfor thecomposer’s attachment