Pain Management & Spine Surgery Procedures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pain Management & Spine Surgery Procedures OrthoNet PPA Code List Pain Management and Spine Surgery Procedures AND Effective 01/01/17 Major Joint and Foot/ Lower Extremity Procedures (Blue Medicare HMO PPO) CATEGORY PROCCODE PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION Pain Management & Spine Surgery Procedures Spinal Fusion 22510 Perq cervicothoracic inject Spinal Fusion 22511 Perq lumbosacral injection Spinal Fusion 22512 Vertebroplasty addl inject Spinal Fusion 22513 Perq vertebral augmentation Spinal Fusion 22514 Perq vertebral augmentation Spinal Fusion 22515 Perq vertebral augmentation Spinal Fusion 22532 LAT THORAX SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22533 LAT LUMBAR SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22534 LAT THOR/LUMB ADDL SEG Spinal Fusion 22548 NECK SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22551 NECK SPINE FUSE&REMOV BEL C2 Spinal Fusion 22552 ADDL NECK SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22554 NECK SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22556 THORAX SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22558 LUMBAR SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22585 ADDITIONAL SPINAL FUSION Spinal Fusion 22586 Prescrl fuse w/ instr l5/s1 Spinal Fusion 22590 SPINE & SKULL SPINAL FUSION Spinal Fusion 22595 NECK SPINAL FUSION Spinal Fusion 22600 NECK SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22610 THORAX SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22612 LUMBAR SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22614 SPINE FUSION, EXTRA SEGMENT Spinal Fusion 22630 LUMBAR SPINE FUSION Spinal Fusion 22632 SPINE FUSION, EXTRA SEGMENT Spinal Fusion 22633 LUMBAR SPINE FUSION COMBINED Spinal Fusion 22634 SPINE FUSION EXTRA SEGMENT Spinal Fusion 22800 FUSION OF SPINE Spinal Fusion 22802 FUSION OF SPINE Spinal Fusion 22804 FUSION OF SPINE Spinal Fusion 22808 FUSION OF SPINE Spinal Fusion 22810 FUSION OF SPINE Spinal Fusion 22812 FUSION OF SPINE Spinal Fusion 22818 KYPHECTOMY, 1-2 SEGMENTS Spinal Fusion 22819 KYPHECTOMY, 3 OR MORE Spinal Fusion 22830 EXPLORATION OF SPINAL FUSION Spinal Fusion 22840 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22841 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22842 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22843 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22844 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22845 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22846 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE OrthoNet PPA Code List Pain Management and Spine Surgery Procedures AND Effective 01/01/17 Major Joint and Foot/ Lower Extremity Procedures (Blue Medicare HMO PPO) CATEGORY PROCCODE PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION Spinal Fusion 22847 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22848 INSERT PELV FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22849 REINSERT SPINAL FIXATION Spinal Fusion 22850 REMOVE SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22852 REMOVE SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22855 REMOVE SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22856 CERV ARTIFIC DISKECTOMY Spinal Fusion 22857 LUMBAR ARTIF DISKECTOMY Spinal Fusion 22858 Second level cer diskectomy Spinal Fusion 22861 REVISE CERV ARTIFIC DISC Spinal Fusion 22862 REVISE LUMBAR ARTIF DISC Spinal Fusion 22864 REMOVE CERV ARTIF DISC Spinal Fusion 22865 REMOVE LUMB ARTIF DISC Spinal Fusion 22899 SPINE SURGERY PROCEDURE Pain Pump 62350 IMPLANT SPINAL CANAL CATH Pain Pump 62351 IMPLANT SPINAL CANAL CATH Pain Pump 62360 INSERT SPINE INFUSION DEVICE Pain Pump 62361 IMPLANT SPINE INFUSION PUMP Pain Pump 62362 IMPLANT SPINE INFUSION PUMP Decompression Surgery 63001 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63003 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63005 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63011 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63012 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63015 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63016 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63017 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63020 NECK SPINE DISK SURGERY Decompression Surgery 63030 LOW BACK DISK SURGERY Decompression Surgery 63035 SPINAL DISK SURGERY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63040 LAMINOTOMY, SINGLE CERVICAL Decompression Surgery 63042 LAMINOTOMY, SINGLE LUMBAR Decompression Surgery 63043 LAMINOTOMY, ADDL CERVICAL Decompression Surgery 63044 LAMINOTOMY, ADDL LUMBAR Decompression Surgery 63045 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63046 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63047 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63048 REMOVE SPINAL LAMINA ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63050 CERVICAL LAMINOPLASTY Decompression Surgery 63051 C-LAMINOPLASTY W/GRAFT/PLATE Decompression Surgery 63055 DECOMPRESS SPINAL CORD Decompression Surgery 63056 DECOMPRESS SPINAL CORD Decompression Surgery 63057 DECOMPRESS SPINE CORD ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63064 DECOMPRESS SPINAL CORD OrthoNet PPA Code List Pain Management and Spine Surgery Procedures AND Effective 01/01/17 Major Joint and Foot/ Lower Extremity Procedures (Blue Medicare HMO PPO) CATEGORY PROCCODE PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION Decompression Surgery 63066 DECOMPRESS SPINE CORD ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63075 NECK SPINE DISK SURGERY Decompression Surgery 63076 NECK SPINE DISK SURGERY Decompression Surgery 63077 SPINE DISK SURGERY, THORAX Decompression Surgery 63078 SPINE DISK SURGERY, THORAX Decompression Surgery 63081 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63082 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63085 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63086 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63087 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63088 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63090 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63091 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63101 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63102 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63103 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63170 INCISE SPINAL CORD TRACT(S) Decompression Surgery 63172 DRAINAGE OF SPINAL CYST Decompression Surgery 63173 DRAINAGE OF SPINAL CYST Decompression Surgery 63180 REVISE SPINAL CORD LIGAMENTS Decompression Surgery 63182 REVISE SPINAL CORD LIGAMENTS Decompression Surgery 63185 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN/NERVES Decompression Surgery 63190 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN/NERVES Decompression Surgery 63191 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN/NERVES Decompression Surgery 63194 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63195 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63196 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63197 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63198 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63199 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63200 RELEASE OF SPINAL CORD Decompression Surgery 63250 REVISE SPINAL CORD VESSELS Decompression Surgery 63251 REVISE SPINAL CORD VESSELS Decompression Surgery 63252 REVISE SPINAL CORD VESSELS Decompression Surgery 63265 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63266 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63267 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63268 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63270 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63271 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63272 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63273 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63275 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63276 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR OrthoNet PPA Code List Pain Management and Spine Surgery Procedures AND Effective 01/01/17 Major Joint and Foot/ Lower Extremity Procedures (Blue Medicare HMO PPO) CATEGORY PROCCODE PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION Decompression Surgery 63277 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63278 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63280 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63281 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63282 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63283 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63285 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63286 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63287 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63290 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63295 REPAIR OF LAMINECTOMY DEFECT Decompression Surgery 63300 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63301 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63302 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63303 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63304 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63305 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63306 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63307 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63308 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Spinal Cord Stimulator 63650 IMPLANT NEUROELECTRODES Spinal Cord Stimulator 63655 IMPLANT NEUROELECTRODES Spinal Cord Stimulator 63661 REMOVE SPINE ELTRD PERQ ARAY Spinal Cord Stimulator 63662 REMOVE SPINE ELTRD PLATE Spinal Cord Stimulator 63663 REVISE SPINE ELTRD PERQ ARAY Spinal Cord Stimulator 63664 REVISE SPINE ELTRD PLATE Spinal Cord Stimulator 63685 IMPLANT NEURORECEIVER Spinal Cord Stimulator 63688 REVISE/REMOVE NEURORECEIVER Spinal Fusion 0195T ARTHROD PRESAC INTERBODY Spinal Fusion 0196T ARTHROD PRESAC INTERBODY EAC Spinal Fusion 0309T Prescrl fuse w/ instr l4/l5 Spinal Fusion 0375T Total disc arthrp ant appr Spinal Fusion 22853 INSJ BIOMCHN DEV INTERVERTEBRAL DSC SPC W/ARTHRD Spinal Fusion 22854 INSJ BIOMCHN DEV VRT CORPECTOMY DEFECT W/ARTHRD Spinal Fusion 22859 INSJ BIOMCHN DEV NTRVRT DISC SPACE W/O ARTHRD Spinal Fusion 22867 INSJ STABLJ DEV W/DCMPRN LUMBAR SINGLE LEVEL Spinal Fusion 22868 INSJ STABLJ DEV W/DCMPRN LUMBAR SECOND LEVEL Spinal Fusion 22869 INSJ STABLJ DEV W/O DCMPRN LUMBAR SINGLE LEVEL Spinal Fusion 22870 INSJ STABLJ DEV W/O DCMPRN LUMBAR SECOND LEVEL Pain Pump 62324 NJX DX/THER SBST INTRLMNR CRV/THRC W/O
Recommended publications
  • Anterior Reconstruction Techniques for Cervical Spine Deformity
    Neurospine 2020;17(3):534-542. Neurospine https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040380.190 pISSN 2586-6583 eISSN 2586-6591 Review Article Anterior Reconstruction Techniques Corresponding Author for Cervical Spine Deformity Samuel K. Cho 1,2 1 1 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7511-2486 Murray Echt , Christopher Mikhail , Steven J. Girdler , Samuel K. Cho 1Department of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn 2 Department of Neurological Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 425 NY, USA West 59th Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY, USA E-mail: [email protected] Cervical spine deformity is an uncommon yet severely debilitating condition marked by its heterogeneity. Anterior reconstruction techniques represent a familiar approach with a range Received: June 24, 2020 of invasiveness and correction potential—including global or focal realignment in the sagit- Revised: August 5, 2020 tal and coronal planes. Meticulous preoperative planning is required to improve or prevent Accepted: August 17, 2020 neurologic deterioration and obtain satisfactory global spinal harmony. The ability to per- form anterior only reconstruction requires mobility of the opposite column to achieve cor- rection, unless a combined approach is planned. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has limited focal correction, but when applied over multiple levels there is a cumulative ef- fect with a correction of approximately 6° per level. Partial or complete corpectomy has the ability to correct sagittal deformity as well as decompress the spinal canal when there is an- terior compression behind the vertebral body.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Spine Coding Basics
    2019 Spine Coding Basics Presenter: Kerri Larson, CPC Directory of Coding and Audit Services 2019 Spine Surgery 01 Spine Surgery Terminology & Anatomy 02 Spine Procedures 03 Case Study 04 Diagnosis 05 Q & A Spine Surgery Terminology & Anatomy Spine Surgery Terminology & Anatomy Term Definition Arthrodesis Fusion, or permanent joining, of a joint, or point of union of two musculoskeletal structures, such as two bones Surgical procedure that replaces missing bone with material from the patient's own body, or from an artificial, synthetic, or Bone grafting natural substitute Corpectomy Surgical excision of the main body of a vertebra, one of the interlocking bones of the back. Cerebrospinal The protective body fluid present in the dura, the membrane covering the brain and spinal cord fluid or CSF Decompression A procedure to remove pressure on a structure. Diskectomy, Surgical removal of all or a part of an intervertebral disc. discectomy Dura Outermost of the three layers that surround the brain and spinal cord. Electrode array Device that contains multiple plates or electrodes. Electronic pulse A device that produces low voltage electrical pulses, with a regular or intermittent waveform, that creates a mild tingling or generator or massaging sensation that stimulates the nerve pathways neurostimulator Spine Surgery Terminology & Anatomy Term Definition The space that surrounds the dura, which is the outermost layer of membrane that surrounds the spinal canal. The epidural space houses the Epidural space spinal nerve roots, blood and lymphatic vessels, and fatty tissues . Present inside the skull but outside the dura mater, which is the thick, outermost membrane covering the brain or within the spine but outside Extradural the dural sac enclosing the spinal cord, nerve roots and spinal fluid.
    [Show full text]
  • Two-Level Cervical Corpectomy—Long-Term Follow-Up Reveals the High Rate of Material Failure in Patients, Who Received an Anterior Approach Only
    Neurosurgical Review (2019) 42:511–518 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-0993-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Two-level cervical corpectomy—long-term follow-up reveals the high rate of material failure in patients, who received an anterior approach only Simon Heinrich Bayerl1 & Florian Pöhlmann1 & Tobias Finger1 & Vincent Prinz1 & Peter Vajkoczy 1 Received: 25 August 2017 /Revised: 20 November 2017 /Accepted: 5 December 2017 /Published online: 18 June 2018 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract In contrast to a one-level cervical corpectomy, a multilevel corpectomy without posterior fusion is accompanied by a high material failure rate. So far, the adequate surgical technique for patients, who receive a two-level corpectomy, remains to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term clinical outcome of patients with cervical myelopathy, who underwent a two-level corpectomy. Outcome parameters of 21 patients, who received a two-level cervical corpectomy, were retrospectively analyzed concerning reoperations and outcome scores (VAS, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Nurick scale, mod- ified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (mJOAS), Short Form 36-item Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36)). The failure rate was determined using postoperative radiographs. The choice over the surgical procedures was exercised by every surgeon individually. Therefore, a distinction between two groups was possible: (1) anterior group (ANT group) with a two-level corpectomy and a cervical plate, (2) anterior/posterior group (A/P group) with two-level corpectomy, cervical plate, and addi- tional posterior fusion. Both groups benefitted from surgery concerning pain, disability, and myelopathy. While all patients of the A/P group showed no postoperative instability, one third of the patients of the ANT group exhibited instability and clinical deterioration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Structural Allograft Biomechanical Guidelines
    8 The Need for Structural Allograft Biomechanical Guidelines Satoshi Kawaguchi, MD Robert A. Hart, MD Abstract Because of their osteoconductive properties, structural bone allografts retain a theoretic advantage in biologic performance compared with artifi cial interbody fusion devices and endoprostheses. Current regulations have addressed the risks of disease transmission and tissue contamination, but comparatively few guidelines exist regarding donor eligibility and bone processing issues with a potential effect on the mechanical integrity of structural allograft bone. The lack of guidelines appears to have led to variation among allograft providers in terms of processing and donor screening regarding issues with recognized mechanical effects. Given the relative lack of data on which to base reasonable screening standards, a basic biomechanical evaluation was performed on one source of structural bone allograft, the femoral ring. Of the tested parameters, the minimum and maximum cortical wall thicknesses of femoral ring allograft were most strongly correlated with the axial compressive load to failure of the graft, suggesting that cortical wall thickness may be a useful screening tool for compressive resistance expected from fresh cortical bone allograft. Development of further biomechanical and clinical data to direct standard development appears warranted. Instr Course Lect 2015;64:87–93. Surgical implantation of structural al- form with limited anatomic modifi - by the US FDA as well as through vol- lograft bone continues to increase de- cations, modern tissue processing in- untary participation with the American spite advances in modern alternatives cludes preparations of amalgams of Association of Tissue Banks (AATB). to allograft, including spine interbody allograft bone tissue of specifi c shapes Guidelines for allograft bone products fusion devices and peripheral joint en- and sizes to suit specifi c surgical needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions
    Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions Spine Surgery Procedure Codes CPT CODES DESCRIPTION Allograft, morselized, or placement of osteopromotive material, for spine surgery only (List separately in addition 20930 to code for primary procedure) 20931 Allograft, structural, for spine surgery only (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); local (eg, ribs, spinous process, or laminar 20936 fragments) obtained from same incision (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); morselized (through separate skin or fascial 20937 incision) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); structural, bicortical or tricortical (through separate 20938 skin or fascial incision) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) 20974 Electrical stimulation to aid bone healing; noninvasive (nonoperative) Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22206 body subtraction); thoracic Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22207 body subtraction); lumbar Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22208 body subtraction); each additional vertebral segment (List separately in addition to code for
    [Show full text]
  • Differences Between Subtotal Corpectomy and Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Spinal Cord (2010) 48, 214–220 & 2010 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/10 $32.00 www.nature.com/sc ORIGINAL ARTICLE Differences between subtotal corpectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy S Shibuya1, S Komatsubara1, S Oka2, Y Kanda1, N Arima1 and T Yamamoto1 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan and 2Oka Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinic, Kagawa, Japan Objective: This study aimed to obtain guidelines for choosing between subtotal corpectomy (SC) and laminoplasty (LP) by analysing the surgical outcomes, radiological changes and problems associated with each surgical modality. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of two interventional case series. Setting: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kagawa University, Japan. Methods: Subjects comprised 34 patients who underwent SC and 49 patients who underwent LP. SC was performed by high-speed drilling to remove vertebral bodies. Autologous strut bone grafting was used. LP was performed as an expansive open-door LP. The level of decompression was from C3 to C7. Clinical evaluations included recovery rate (RR), frequency of C5 root palsy after surgery, re-operation and axial pain. Radiographic assessments included sagittal cervical alignment and bone union. Results: Comparisons between the two groups showed no significant differences in age at surgery, preoperative factors, RR and frequency of C5 palsy. Progression of kyphotic changes, operation time and volumes of blood loss and blood transfusion were significantly greater in the SC (two- or three- level) group. Six patients in the SC group required additional surgery because of pseudoarthrosis, and four patients underwent re-operation because of adjacent level disc degeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of a Spine Registry Rate Among Smokers Undergoing
    No Difference in Functional Outcome but Higher Revision Rate Among Smokers Undergoing Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Analysis of a Spine Registry Lee Wen-Shen, Maksim Lai Wern Sheng, William Yeo, Tan Seang Beng, Yue Wai Mun, Guo Chang Ming and Mohammad Mashfiqul Arafin Siddiqui Int J Spine Surg published online 29 December 2020 http://ijssurgery.com/content/early/2020/12/17/7140 This information is current as of October 2, 2021. Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://ijssurgery.com/alerts The International Journal of Spine Surgery 2397 Waterbury Circle, Suite 1, Aurora, IL 60504, Phone: +1-630-375-1432 © 2020 ISASS. All RightsDownloaded Reserved. from http://ijssurgery.com/ by guest on October 2, 2021 International Journal of Spine Surgery, Vol. 00, No. 00, 0000, pp. 000–000 https://doi.org/10.14444/7140 ÓInternational Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery No Difference in Functional Outcome but Higher Revision Rate Among Smokers Undergoing Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Analysis of a Spine Registry LEE WEN-SHEN, MBBS (HONS),1,2 MAKSIM LAI WERN SHENG, MBBS,1 WILLIAM YEO,3 TAN SEANG BENG, MBBS, FRCS,1 YUE WAI MUN, MBBS, FRCS,1 GUO CHANG MING, MBBS, FRCS,1 MOHAMMAD MASHFIQUL ARAFIN SIDDIQUI, MBBS, FRCS1 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 2Department of Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, 3Statistics and Clinical Research, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore ABSTRACT Background: Smoking is a known predictor of negative outcomes in spinal surgery. However, its effect on the functional outcomes and revision rates after ADR is not well-documented.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Health Spine and Joint Code List
    Priority Health Joint Services Code List Category CPT® Code CPT® Code Description Joint Services 23000 Removal of subdeltoid calcareous deposits, open Joint Services 23020 Capsular contracture release (eg, Sever type procedure) Joint Services 23120 Claviculectomy; partial Joint Services 23130 Acromioplasty or acromionectomy, partial, with or without coracoacromial ligament release Joint Services 23410 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; acute Joint Services 23412 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open;chronic Joint Services 23415 Coracoacromial ligament release, with or without acromioplasty Joint Services 23420 Reconstruction of complete shoulder (rotator) cuff avulsion, chronic (includes acromioplasty) Joint Services 23430 Tenodesis of long tendon of biceps Joint Services 23440 Resection or transplantation of long tendon of biceps Joint Services 23450 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior; Putti-Platt procedure or Magnuson type operation Joint Services 23455 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior;with labral repair (eg, Bankart procedure) Joint Services 23460 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type; with bone block Joint Services 23462 Capsulorrhaphy, anterior, any type;with coracoid process transfer Joint Services 23465 Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, posterior, with or without bone block Joint Services 23466 Capsulorrhaphy, glenohumeral joint, any type multi-directional instability Joint Services 23470 ARTHROPLASTY, GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; HEMIARTHROPLASTY ARTHROPLASTY, GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; TOTAL SHOULDER [GLENOID
    [Show full text]
  • Musculoskeletal Surgical Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization (Effective 11.1.2020)
    Musculoskeletal Surgical Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization (Effective 11.1.2020) Procedure Code Description ACL Repair 27407 Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; cruciate ACL Repair 27409 Repair, primary, torn ligament and/or capsule, knee; collateral and cruciate ligaments ACL Repair 29888 Arthroscopically aided anterior cruciate ligament repair/augmentation or reconstruction Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23130 Acromioplasty Or Acromionectomy, Partial, With Or Without Coracoacromial Ligament Release Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23410 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; acute Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23412 Repair of ruptured musculotendinous cuff (eg, rotator cuff) open; chronic Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23415 Coracoacromial Ligament Release, With Or Without Acromioplasty Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 23420 Reconstruction of complete shoulder (rotator) cuff avulsion, chronic (includes acromioplasty) Arthroscopy, Shoulder, Surgical; Decompression Of Subacromial Space With Partial Acromioplasty, With Coracoacromial Ligament (Ie, Arch) Release, When Performed (List Separately In Addition Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 29826 To Code For Primary Procedure) Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair 29827 Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; with rotator cuff repair Allograft for Spinal Fusion [BMP] 20930 Allograft, morselized, or placement of osteopromotive material, for spine surgery only Ankle Fusion 27870 Arthrodesis, ankle, open Ankle Fusion
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Anatonly of the Anterior Cervical Spine: the Disc Space, Vertebral Artery, and Associated Bony Structures
    Surgical AnatonlY of the Anterior Cervical Spine: The Disc Space, Vertebral Artery, and Associated Bony Structures T. Glenn Pait, M.D., James A. Killefer, M.D., Kenan I. Arnautovic, M.D. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (TGP, KIA), and Department of Neurosurgery (jAK), West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the relationships between the neurovascular structures and surrounding bone, which are hidden from the surgeon by soft tissue, and to aid in avoiding nerve root and vertebral artery injury in anterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Using six cadaveric spines, we measured important landmarks on the anterior surface of the spine, the bony housing protecting the neurovascular structures in the lateral disc space, and the changes that occur during the discectomy with interbody distraction of the vertebral bodies. The measurements included the distance between the medial borders of the longus colli muscle at the level of each interspace; the width and height of each disc space at the midline; the width and height of the costal process; the distances between the cranial tip of the uncinate process (UP) and the vertebral body (VB) above and from the tip of the UP to the vertebral artery; the anteroposterior diameter or the extent of the disc spaces in the midline; the height at the midpoint of the distracted disc space; the UP-VB distance in distraction; and the width of the visible nerve root. RESULTS: The distance between the medial borders of the longus colli muscles increased in a rostral to caudal direction. The height of the UP was shortest at C4-C5 and greatest at C5-C6; the width was narrowest at C4-C5 and widest at C6-C7.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrective Ulnar Osteotomy/-Ectomy
    Post-operative Information: Corrective ulnar osteotomy/-ectomy Your pet has had a growth abnormality of the ulna (bone of forearm) corrected with either a high ulnar osteotomy or a low ulnar ostectomy or both. These procedures are used to correct developmental abnormalities of the elbow and/or the wrist (which often are both present to some degree). The key to success with these procedures is that the remaining bone growth will continue after surgery and slowly bring the elbow and/or the wrist back into alignment. Long term joint stiffness and degenerative joint disease (i.e. “arthritis”) may be a complication of these growth abnormalities that may need to be managed. ACTIVITY RESTRICTION x 6 weeks . Please keep your pet in a comfortable, safe indoor location without free access to stairs for the next 24 hours as he/she recovers from anesthesia and surgery. Your pet may be groggy for the first few days. He or she may whine or appear more anxious than usual; this may indicate pain/discomfort or side-effects of the medications. Please call your veterinarian for assistance with medication adjustments or return for exam and additional pain medications as needed. Confine your pet to one level/section of the house on carpeted floors. Use baby gaits, etc. to prevent access to slick floors or stairs. Do not allow jumping on/off furniture. Confine to a small area/room/crate when unattended. Please do not allow any playing, running or jumping. For dogs, use a short leash when going outside to urinate/defecate. Your pet will feel like using the leg normally before the bone is healed.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Analysis Plan
    ~ GILEAU STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PLAN Study Title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety ofTenofovir Alafenamide (fAF) versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (fDF)-containing Regimens in Subjects with Chmnic HBV Infection and Stage 2 or Greater Chronic Kidney Disease Who Have Received a Liver Transplant Name of Test Drug: Tenofovir Alafenamide (fAF) Study Number: GS-US-320-3912 Protocol Version (Date): Amendment 2 (28 March 2017) Analysis Type: Week 24 Analysis Plan Version: Version 1.0 Analysis Plan Date: 19 March 2018 ..._ ...... Analysis Plan Author(s): PD______ CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION TAF GS-US-320-3912 Statistical Analysis Plan – Week 24 Analysis Version 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................................................2 LIST OF IN-TEXT TABLES........................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................................................................5 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................8 1.1. Study Objectives ......................................................................................................................................8 1.2. Study Design ............................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]