Fort Augustus – Skye Project

Route Options (Section 2) Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

June 2017 REF: LT91

Rev

Prepared Checked Approved Date of

By By By Issue

ASH AC JT 04.04.2017

ASH AC JT 26.06.2017

CONTENTS

GLOSSARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Purpose of Document 3 2. THE PROPOSALS 3 2.1 The Existing Overhead Line 3 2.2 Project Overview 3 2.3 Proposals Overview 3 3. DESCRIPTION OF ROUTES 6 3.1 Corridor and Identification of Sections 6 3.2 Identification of Route Options 6 4. METHODOLOGY 7 4.1 Study Area 7 4.2 Issues Scoped Out of Assessment and Baseline Scenario Assumptions 7 4.3 Landscape Character Effects Methodology 7 4.4 Visual Effects Methodology 7 5. LANDSCAPE BASELINE 8 5.1 Introduction 8 5.2 Baseline Conditions 8 6. VISUAL AMENITY BASELINE 10 6.1 Introduction 10 6.2 Baseline 10 7. LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT 12 7.1 Introduction 12 7.2 Route Option 2A 12 7.3 Route Option 2B 14 8. REFERENCES 18

Appendices

Appendix 1: Landscape Character Assessment Methodology

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment (Route Options 2A and 2B)

Appendix 3: Visual Assessment Methodology

Appendix 4A: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2A)

Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B)

Figures

Figure 1: Landscape Designations

Figure 2: Landscape Character

Figure 3: Visual Effects (Route Option 2A)

Figure 4: Visual Effects (Route Option 2B)

GLOSSARY

Term Definition

Alignment A centre line of an overhead line OHL, along with location of key angle structures.

Amenity The natural environment, cultural heritage, landscape and visual quality. Also includes the impact of SHE Transmission’s works on communities, such as the effects of noise and disturbance from construction activities.

Conductor A metallic wire strung from structure to structure, to carry electric current.

Consultation The dynamic process of dialogue between individuals or groups, based on a genuine exchange of views and, normally, with the objective of influencing decisions, policies or programmes of action.

Corridor A linear area which allows a continuous connection between the defined connection points. The corridor may vary in width along its length; in unconstrained areas it may be many kilometres wide.

Environmental Impact A formal process set down in The Electricity Works (EIA) (Scotland) Assessment (EIA) Regulations 2000 (as amended in 2017) used to systematically identify, predict and assess the likely significant environmental impacts of a proposed project or development.

Gardens and Designed The Inventory of Gardens and Designed Landscapes lists those gardens or Landscapes (GDLs) designed landscapes which are considered by a panel of experts to be of national importance.

Habitat Term most accurately meaning the place in which a species lives, but also used to describe plant communities or agglomerations of plant communities.

Kilovolt (kV) One thousand volts.

Micrositing The process of positioning individual structures to avoid localised environmental or technical constraints.

Mitigation Term used to indicate avoidance, remediation or alleviation of adverse impacts.

National Scenic Area A national level designation applied to those landscapes considered to be of (NSA) exceptional scenic value.

Overhead line (OHL) An electric line installed above ground, usually supported by lattice steel towers or poles.

Plantation Woodland Woodland of any age that obviously originated from planting.

Riparian Woodland Natural home for plants and animals occurring in a thin strip of land bordering a stream or river.

Route A linear area of approximately 1 km width (although this may be narrower/wider in specific locations in response to identified pinch points / constraints), which provides a continuous connection between defined connection points.

Routeing The work undertaken which leads to the selection of a proposed alignment, capable of being taken forward into the consenting process under Section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989.

Semi-natural Woodland Woodland that does not obviously originate from planting. The distribution of species will generally reflect the variations in the site and the soil. Planted trees must account for less than 30% of the canopy composition

Span The section of overhead line between two structures.

Special Landscape Area Landscapes designated by The Highland Council which are considered to be of (SLA) regional/local importance for their scenic qualities.

1

Term Definition

Stakeholders Organisations and individuals who can affect or are affected by SHE Transmission works.

Study Area The area within which the LVIA study takes place.

Terminal Structure A structure (tower or pole) required where the line terminates either at a substation or at the beginning and end of an underground cable section.

The National Grid The electricity transmission network in Great Britain.

Volts The international unit of electric potential and electromotive force.

Wayleave A voluntary agreement entered into between a landowner upon whose land an overhead line is to be constructed and SHE Transmission

Wild Land Area (WLA) Those areas comprising the greatest and most extensive areas of wild characteristics within Scotland.

2

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose of Document

This Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) has been prepared by ASH design+assessment Limited (ASH) on behalf of Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission plc (SHE Transmission plc). The report assesses Route Options 2A and 2B, included within the Fort Augustus to Skye Project: Environmental Route Options Report (November 2016). The Environmental Route Options Report concluded that, “…on balance it is considered that there would be a slight preference for Route Option 2B from a landscape and visual perspective as it would result in the removal of the existing 132 kV OHL which is routed adjacent to a major tourist route through a sensitive and dramatic landscape.”

Following stakeholder feedback on the Fort Augustus to Skye Project: Consultation Document (September 2016), and given the sensitivity of this section of the project, it was decided that further environmental and engineering studies would be undertaken to identify a preferred route and acceptable alignment.

As a result, a more detailed comparative LVIA has been undertaken for these two routes with the aim being to assist with the decision making process. However it should be noted that this does not consider engineering and cost-based considerations, nor other environmental topics. 2. THE PROPOSALS

2.1 The Existing Overhead Line

The existing 132 kV overhead line (OHL) from Fort Augustus to Dunvegan on the Isle of Skye is the sole connection from the grid to Skye and the Western Isles. The existing transmission infrastructure is made up of three distinct sections, which were constructed at different times over the last 65 years in response to changing needs. This comprises the following:

1. Fort Augustus Tee to Quoich – a single 132 kV circuit of steel lattice towers, strung with a single circuit and constructed in the mid 1950’s to connect the Quoich hydroelectric power station to the grid; 2. Quoich to Broadford – a double 132 kV circuit of steel lattice towers, strung with a single circuit only and constructed between 1979 and 1980; and 3. Broadford to Dunvegan – a single 132 kV circuit of trident wood pole, strung with a single circuit and constructed in 1989. This network is currently at capacity and, as a result of an increase in renewable energy projects requesting access to the electricity network, there is a requirement to increase the capacity to Skye. This will also improve the resilience of the transmission network between Fort Augustus and Skye.

2.2 Project Overview This Report concentrates on the section of the project between Broadford and Sligachan, referred to in the Consultation Document as Section 2.

To facilitate this connection requirement within Section 2 the following would be required:

 Construction of a replacement, single circuit 132 kV OHL using a H pole from the existing Broadford Substation to the existing Dunvegan Substation (outwith Section 2); and  Installation of additional equipment and minor works on the 33 kV network at the existing Broadford Substation.

The existing 132 kV trident wood pole OHL between Broadford Substation and Dunvegan Substation would be removed after completion of the works.

2.3 Proposals Overview

The proposed trident H pole would have a nominal height of approximately 16 m (including insulators and support). The spacing between poles would vary depending on topography and altitude. The distance between

3

poles would be determined after a detailed line survey, but would be approximately 100 m apart. A photograph showing a typical trident H pole configuration is shown in Plate 2.1 below.

Plate 2.1: H Pole Configuration

Between Dunvegan and Broadford substations, the existing single circuit 132 kV OHL consists of a single wooden pole with a “trident” head, between approximately 12 – 16 m in height. This would be replaced by a higher capacity trident H pole (approximately 16 m in height). During construction, the existing OHL and its replacement would run in tandem but on energisation of the new OHL, the existing OHL would be dismantled and removed.

2.3.1 Construction Activities

Key tasks during construction of the project would relate to:

 Improvements to the public road network;  Establishment of suitable laydown areas for materials and installation of temporary track solutions (e.g. Trackway), as necessary;  Upgrades to existing tracks and potentially new tracks (see 2.3.3) where required;  Delivery of structures and materials to site;  Assembly and erection of wood pole structures and stays;  Stringing of conductors using hauling ropes and winches; and  Dismantling of existing infrastructure between Broadford and Dunvegan.

4

Installation of the wood poles would involve the following tasks:

 Excavation of a suitable area for the wood poles, and backfilling after installation of the pole (backfilling would generally be carried out the same day as excavation so that no open excavations are left overnight). The exact area would depend on the ground conditions at each pole;  In some pole locations, it may be necessary to add imported hardcore backfill around the pole foundations to provide additional stability in areas where the natural sub soils have poor compaction qualities;  Conductors would be installed on the wood poles using full tension stringing to prevent the conductor coming into contact with the ground; and  Remedial works would be carried out to reinstate the immediate vicinity of the structures, and any ground disturbed, to pre-existing condition. This would be undertaken using excavated material.

2.3.2 Forestry Removal

Construction of the project would require the removal of some sections of commercial forest, which would be undertaken in consultation with the Forestry Commission Scotland (FCS) and affected landowners.

After felling, any timber removed that is commercially viable would be sold and the remaining forest material would be dealt with in a way that delivers the best practicable environmental outcome and is compliant with waste regulations.

An operational corridor with a maximum width of 80m i.e. 40m either side from the centre of the proposed line would be required to enable the safe operation and maintenance of the OHL. This will vary depending on the type of woodland (based on species present) in proximity to the OHL. In areas of native woodland it is usually possible to provide a narrower corridor due to a reduced risk of trees falling on the OHL.

2.3.3 Access during Construction

Vehicle access is required to each pole location during construction to allow excavation and creation of foundations and pole installation. Existing tracks would be used where possible. Preference will be given to lower impact access solutions including the use of low pressure tracked personnel vehicles and Trackway in boggy / soft ground areas to reduce any damage to, and compaction of, the ground. These journeys would be kept to a minimum to minimise disruption to habitats along the route. However, temporary stone tracks may be necessary in some areas depending on existing access conditions, terrain and altitude.

The transportation of wood poles by helicopter will be considered where practicable. This delivery method has the potential to minimise the overall construction programme, limit the amount of traffic on the local road network during the construction phase of work and minimise damage to habitats.

Permanent access tracks would only be required in more remote areas where access during construction requires a higher specification track, and where long term maintenance needs require permanent access. This will be kept to a minimum.

2.3.4 Programme

It is anticipated that construction of the project overall would take place over a 36 month period, following the granting of consents, although detailed programming of the works would be the responsibility of the Contractor in agreement with SHE Transmission plc.

Every effort would be made to minimise disturbance to landowners and local residents during construction by providing regular updates on works and restrictions via the site manager, community liaison manager and corporate affairs team.

5

3. DESCRIPTION OF ROUTES

3.1 Corridor and Identification of Sections

Prior to the appraisal of route options, a Corridor was identified within which the identification and assessment of route options could be completed. Due to the length of the project, it was necessary to break down the Corridor into six sections to more easily describe, identify and assess route options. These comprised:

 Section 1 – Dunvegan to Sligachan;  Section 2 – Sligachan to Broadford;  Section 3 – Broadford to Kyle Rhea;  Section 4 – Kyle Rhea to Loch Quoich / Loch Cluanie;  Section 5 – Loch Quoich / Loch Cluanie to Invergarry / Glen Moriston; and  Section 6 – Invergarry / Glen Moriston to Fort Augustus.

3.2 Identification of Route Options

Within each of the sections listed above, indicative route options have been defined with 1 km widths to allow for subsequent identification of alignments during Stage 3 of the project.

This Report concentrates on Section 2 only and the routes associated with this section are described below (see also Figures 1 to 4).

3.2.1 Section 2 – Sligachan to Broadford (North to South Description)

Route 2A – Following the route of the existing wood pole overhead line, skirting the edge of The Cuillins. The route generally follows the A87, apart from at Am Muall and Creag Strollemus where it is routed to the south of these hills.

Route 2B – This route option would avoid Sligachan by crossing Glen Varragill in an easterly direction, crossing moorland to the north of Ben Lee before heading south to Peinachorrain and Loch Sligachan. A subsea cable crossing of Loch Sligachan would be required before the H pole line would take a generally south eastern route from Sconser to Moll, following a route influenced by landform. A further subsea cable crossing of Loch Ainort would be required, before the H pole line would re-join Route Option 2A at either Luib or Ard Dorch. This sub- option is referred to as sub-option AD in this study.

6

4. METHODOLOGY

4.1 Study Area

The study area for the LVIA is based on an offset of 3km from the route centreline. After the initial route options appraisal and bearing in mind the nature of the development, it was decided that this would encompass the area within which any significant effects upon landscape character and visual amenity could occur.

Due to the alignment not being known at this stage a Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) diagram has not been run in this instance. As a result this comparative route assessment is based on the assumption that the alignment will follow the centreline of the Corridor and assumed intervisibilty has been based upon site-based observation rather than desk-based mapping.

Using the same study area for both the landscape and visual assessments allows for the evaluation of the relationship between the Development and the wider landscape and visual resource of the study area and the potential resultant effects.

4.2 Issues Scoped Out of Assessment and Baseline Scenario Assumptions

Effects arising from the process of decommissioning are considered to be of a generally reduced nature and duration to those arising from the construction process and therefore have not been considered separately in this report.

There are no other overhead line developments currently proposed within the study area, and as such a separate assessment of cumulative landscape and visual effects has been scoped out of this study.

Existing overhead lines within the study area are considered as part of the baseline scenario.

4.3 Landscape Character Effects Methodology

The evaluation of landscape sensitivity, magnitude and landscape assessment is based on guidance from the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment: Third Edition (GLVIA3). Landscape Character Methodology and Criteria are detailed in Appendix 1.

4.4 Visual Effects Methodology

The evaluation of potential effects on visual amenity is also based on guidance from GLVIA3. Visual Effects Methodology and Criteria are detailed in Appendix 3.

7

5. LANDSCAPE BASELINE

5.1 Introduction

Effects upon landscape character may arise through the introduction of new components which can have a direct or indirect effect upon established landscape patterns and features. These interactions can have a negative or a positive effect on landscape character. For instance, the scale and form of new development can prove inappropriate and intrusive in the context of existing landform, settlement and planting structure. Development may also result in the loss or fragmentation of important and distinctive landscape components. Alternatively, elements introduced may replace features seen as discordant with the existing landscape pattern and they may enhance or extend rare and valuable landscape components.

5.2 Baseline Conditions

5.2.1 Desk-based Review of Constraints

A desk-based exercise was initially undertaken to establish potential landscape constraints within the two Route Options assessed. This section provides a review of landscape baseline information considered (see also Figures 1 and 2). Special qualities of all landscape designations and protected landscapes are described in Appendix 2.

5.2.2 Designated and Protected Landscapes

National Scenic Areas (NSAs)

National Scenic Area (NSA) is a national level designation applied to those landscapes considered to be of exceptional scenic value. NSAs are considered to represent Scotland’s finest landscapes that must be conserved as part of the country’s natural heritage. The special qualities which are considered to contribute to the value of each NSA are described in the SNH publication ‘The Special Qualities of the National Scenic Areas’ (SNH, 2010).

There is one NSA within the study area; the Cuillin Hills NSA, as illustrated in Figure 1 and described in Appendix 2.

Other Nationally Important Landscapes

Wild Land Areas (WLAs)

Wild Land Areas (WLAs) have been defined by SNH as those areas comprising the greatest and most extensive areas of wild characteristics within Scotland. Although not a statutory designation, these are given protection within the Planning System through Scottish Planning Policy (SPP).

There is one WLA within the study area; the Cuillin WLA, as illustrated in Figure 1 and described in Appendix 2. The wild land characteristics of both route options is summarised within the Landscape Character descriptions within Appendix 2, and the potential effects on wild land has fed into the landscape character assessment for each option.

Inventory Gardens and Designed Landscapes (GDLs)

The Inventory of Gardens and Designed Landscapes lists those gardens or designed landscapes (GDLs) which are considered by a panel of experts to be of national importance. Whilst not a statutory designation, inclusion on the Inventory is a material planning consideration.

On the periphery of the study area there is one GDL; Raasay House as illustrated on Figure 1. However, since this is not within the study area it has not been considered further in this assessment.

Regional / Local Level Designations

Local Authorities have the ability to designate landscapes considered to be of regional/local importance for their scenic qualities within the Local Development Plan system. Such landscapes identified by Highland Council are referred to as Special Landscape Areas (SLAs) and are described in the publication “Assessment of Highland Special Landscape Areas” (Horner + Maclennan, 2011) along with identification of their Special Qualities.

8

Within the study area there is one SLA; Trotternish and Tianaviaig SLA as detailed in Appendix 2 and illustrated on Figure 1.

5.2.3 Landscape Character

Landscape Context

The north part of the study area marks a transition between gentle moorland hills and stark, steep mountains. These comprise the very dramatic and rugged ridgelines of the Cuillins in the southern part of the study area with more simple structured steep conical peaks to the north including Marsco and Glamaig. Deep, sweeping, heather-clad glens and corries separate the mountains, contrasting with the dramatic summits of crags and scree-slopes where the grey of stone predominates. Access and habitation is mostly limited to the narrow coastal edge of this section with a strong impression of wildness within its mountainous interior.

Landscape Character Types

The study area is comprised of 7 Landscape Character Types (LCTs), as outlined in the Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment (LUC, 1996), from the SNH suite of landscape character assessment documents. Distribution of these LCTs is shown in Figure 2.

In order to identify potential effects to landscape character an appraisal of landscape sensitivity has been undertaken of each LCT within the study area. A detailed description of the key characteristics and sensitivity, magnitude and assessment of landscape effects is included in Appendix 2.

9

6. VISUAL AMENITY BASELINE

6.1 Introduction

Visual effects can include the potential change in existing views obtained from properties, settlements, routes and other outdoor locations.

6.2 Baseline

6.2.1 Settlements

Broadford, to the far east of the study area, has been scoped out of the assessment as large coniferous plantations to the west and south of the village would screen likely views of the development options under review. There are no other major villages within the study area. Settlement instead consists of scattered crofting townships and linear communities along the coastal fringes and main glens such as the string of small townships along the eastern shoreline between Camustianavaig and Peinachorrain; as well as Sligachan, Sconser, Moll, Luib, Ard Dorch, Dunan, and Strollamus.

6.2.2 Potential Visual Receptors

Visual receptors within the study area comprise three different types:

 Views from built properties including residential areas and places of work;  Views from routes including roads and recreational routes; and  Views from other outdoor locations where the view is considered of recreational importance.

Views from Buildings

As described above, settlement is spread throughout the study area, primarily around the coastline and within the main glens. As a rural area, properties are frequently orientated to take advantage of the view with many obtaining open coastal or loch views or views across or along glens.

Views from Routes

Roads

There are two A roads and one B road within the study area:

 The A87: a main trunk road running from the Skye Bridge and Broadford following the narrow north- east coastline and glens of Skye to Portree. This route provides valued views along this section of the Cuillins and adjoining sea-lochs and deep glens;  The A863: a route from Sligachan to Dunvegan along the western coast providing open views towards the Cuillins from its southern end; and  The B883; a single track road which runs from just south of Portree on the A87 along the eastern coast down to the crofting settlements of The Braes; terminating at Peinachorrain on Loch Sligaghan.

Notable unclassified routes within the study area comprise:

 Sconser-Moll: an elevated single track road leading from Sconser via Moll to the head of Loch Ainort with dramatic and extensive views obtained towards Raasay, Scalpay, the Cuillins and Loch Ainort.

Recreational Routes

The mountainous and coastal landscape of the study area is popular with walkers, hikers and climbers and there are many upland walking routes throughout its length including a number of Core Paths. The majority of these are routes through the Cuillins, largely converging on Sligachan. More extreme routes to mountain summits and ridges come off these paths. All of these routes are used for recreational pursuits where the appreciation of the view across lochs, down valleys and elevated from mountain-sides and summits is of particular importance.

10

Views from Recreational Viewpoints (Outdoor Locations)

There are a number of other locations throughout the study area recognised as important recreational viewpoints. These include the summits of the Cuillins; roadside vantage points at and around Sligachan, Peinachorrain, Sconser, Luib and overlooking the head of Loch Ainort, on Raasay; and also Skye Golf Club at Sconser.

11

7. LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT

7.1 Introduction

This section provides a summary of the potential landscape and visual effects identified for Route Options 2A and 2B. A detailed review of potential effects is presented in Appendices 2 and 4A/4B and this section should be read in conjunction with these appendices, as well as Figures 1 to 4 which illustrate potential landscape and visual baseline constraints and assessment of effects.

7.2 Route Option 2A

This Route Option follows the alignment of the existing 132 kV wood pole OHL. This is a sparsely populated area but one with high visitor numbers as the A87 winds its way around the base of the Cuillins and Lochs Sligachan and Ainort. Sligachan is an important tourist hub. Photographs are provided in Plate 7.1 for reference purposes. Access during construction would be facilitated by the proximity of the A87, although traffic management measures would need to be put in place. It is anticipated that there would be no requirement for new, permanent access tracks within this Route Option.

Landscape and Visual Context

The majority of this route follows the A87 and skirts the edge of the Cuillin Hills NSA and Cuillins WLA. This is a sensitive and dramatic landscape, although views of the existing 132 kV OHL and lower voltage distribution infrastructure are common when travelling through this landscape along the A87. Existing infrastructure is often routed in parallel to each other and there are areas along this section whereby finding a new alignment for a new H pole would be challenging. The potential landscape and visual effects of a new OHL would however be offset somewhat by the removal of the existing line, assuming that a sensitive alignment is achieved.

7.2.1 Route Option 2A Landscape Effects

The detailed Landscape Effects Table for Route Options 2A and 2B may be found in Appendix 2. As can be seen in Appendix 2, there are no significant beneficial or adverse landscape effects predicted as arising from Route Option 2A. This is due to the fact that the new OHL would be replacing the existing OHL along a similar route and would only be slightly larger than the existing and although there would be adverse effects arising, these would range from Minor to Minor-Moderate and therefore would not be significant.

7.2.2 Route Option 2A Visual Effects

The detailed Visual Effects Table for Route Option 2A may be found in Appendix 4a. As can be seen from Appendix 4a, Figure 3 and Summary Table 7.1, there are no significant beneficial visual effects predicted as arising from Route Option 2A. Significant adverse construction and operational effects would also be few in number and Moderate in level. This is due to the fact that the new OHL would be replacing the existing OHL along a similar route and would only be slightly larger than the existing. These Moderate adverse effects would only occur where the proposed new OHL runs very close to the A87 up Gleann Torra-mhichaig before crossing the road twice at the head of Loch Ainort. At these locations the difference between the old and new OHL would be very noticeable due to the close proximity and due to elevated, silhouetted views down Loch Ainort when viewed from these locations. Table 7.1 summarises those receptors that could receive potential significant effects on visual amenity as a result of Route Option 2A.

12

Plate 7.1: Route Option 2A Photographs

Photo Locations: 1; View looking north east over Sligachan Camp Site. 2; View looking north east along A87 on south shore of Loch Sligachan. 3; View looking south on A87 between Loch Sligachan and Loch Ainort. 4; View from minor road at head of Loch Ainort.

Table 7.1: Summary Table of Significant Visual Effects – Route Option 2A

ID Visual Level of Effect during Construction and Operation Receptor Adverse Effect Beneficial Effect

Moderate Moderate Major Moderate Moderate Major – Major – Major

R1E A87 Loch √ Ainort

R1F A87 Loch √ Ainort to Sconser

O1 Lay-By, A87 √ above Loch Ainort

13

7.3 Route Option 2B

This Route Option would depart from Route Option 1A at Glen Varragill, to the north of Sligachan. It would be routed towards Peinachorrain whereupon it would cross Loch Sligachan by subsea cable close to the existing subsea distribution cable crossing. From a landing point near the ferry terminal to Raasay, the route travels in a south easterly direction where by a further subsea cable crossing of Loch Ainort would be required. The route would then re-join Route Option 2A either at Luib or Ard Dorch (sub-option AD). Photographs are provided in Plate 7.2 for reference purposes.

In contrast to Route Option 2A, parts of this route option are remote and would require temporary access during construction, making use of helicopters, temporary track solutions and low pressure tracked vehicles to minimise potential landscape and visual effects arising from construction vehicles and machinery. There are also sections of arduous terrain (e.g. Meall Buidhe, Meall a’ Mhaoil and Am Meall) that would be likely to require stronger supports and shorter span lengths.

No new, permanent access tracks are anticipated within this route option however this would be confirmed following detailed design.

Landscape and Visual Context

This route would result in the removal of the existing OHL which is routed along a major tourist route and dramatic landscape which is recognised by its designation as a NSA (see Figure 1).

Plate 7.2: Route Option 2B Photographs

Photo Locations: 1; View from Sligachan Ferry Port toward Peinachorrain. 2; View over Isle of Skye Golf Club, Sconser. 3; View looking south east from minor road to Moll showing Quarry. 4; View looking north west from minor road to Moll, toward Peinachorrain

14

7.3.1 Landscape Effects

The detailed Landscape Effects Table for Route Option 2B may be found in Appendix 2 and significant effects arising from Route Option 2B are summarised in Table 7.2. There are three significant beneficial landscape effects predicted as arising from Route Option 2B during construction and operation, at the level of Moderate. These beneficial effects arise due to the removal of the existing OHL from areas of high landscape sensitivity associated with the Cuillin Hills and the rounded hills which lie below them.

However there would also be significant adverse effects, at the level of Moderate, in the Rugged Massif and Linear Crofting LCTs along the coastal strip which Route Option 2B largely hugs; in many cases areas where no OHL currently exists.

Table 7.2: Summary Table of Significant Landscape Effects – Route Option 2B

ID Landscape Level of Effect during Construction and Operation Receptor Adverse Effect Beneficial Effect

Moderate Moderate Major Moderate Moderate Major – Major – Major

- Cuillin Hills NSA/ √ Cuillin WLA

LCT1 Angular Mountain √ Range

LCT3 Rugged Massif √

LCT4 Rounded Hills √

LCT6 Linear Crofting √

7.3.2 Route Option 2B Visual Effects

The detailed Visual Effects Table for Route Option 2B may be found in Appendix 4B. As can be seen from Appendix 4B, and Summary Table 7.3, there are seven significant beneficial visual effects predicted as arising from Route Option 2B during construction and operation, mostly at the level of Moderate-Major. These arise due to the removal of the existing OHL within the views of sensitive receptors in buildings and outdoor locations at Sligachan; and within the views of road users on the A87, notably at the heads of Loch Ainort and Loch Sligachan. In addition, if the Ard Dorch (AD) sub-route was selected, two additional significant benefits would accrue to sensitive residential receptors at Luib and road users on the A87 at the same location.

Four significant adverse construction and operational effects are predicted to occur at sensitive residential receptors at Peinachorrain and Moll and the Isle of Skye Golf Course where the proposed OHL would be a new feature in the view. Such effects are predicted to be Moderate or Moderate-Major in level.

If sub-route AD was chosen, a significant moderate adverse effect would arise on the A87 at Ard Dorch where the new OHL would rise from underground cable above the road. However there would also be a significant moderate adverse visual effect in views in Luib if the route via Luib was alternatively selected.

15

Table 7.3: Summary Table of Significant Visual Effects – Route Option 2B

ID Visual Level of Effect during Construction and Operation Receptor Adverse Effect Beneficial Effect

Moderate Moderate Major Moderate Moderate Major – Major – Major

B3b Luib √

B3b Luib √ (AD)

B6b Moll √

B10 Sligachan Hotel √ and Camp Site

B11 Sligachan Lodge √ & Bunk House

B12a Peinachorrain √ (Localised)

O1 Lay-by, A87 √ above Loch Ainort

O2 Isle of Skye Golf √ Course

O3 Sligachan √ Parking Area / Picnic Area / Vantage Point

R1c A87 Ard Dorch √ (AD)

R1d A87 Luib √ (AD)

R1e A87 Loch Ainort √

R1f A87 Loch Ainort √ to Sconser

R1h A87 West of √ Sconser

16

7.3.3 Conclusion and Recommendations

The conclusions of the Environmental Route Option Report referred to in Section 1.1 of this report have been largely borne out by this more detailed LVIA of Route Options 2A and 2B.

On balance it is concluded therefore that there is a preference in landscape terms for Route Option 2B as the benefits accruing from this route to the sensitive landscape of the Cuillin Hills NSA and the Cuillins WLA in our opinion outweigh the disbenefits accruing to the less sensitive coastal hills and the character of a linear coastal crofting settlement.

In visual terms, whilst a small number of significant adverse effects will result, on balance it is considered that there would be a preference for Route Option 2B as it would result in the removal of the existing 132 kV OHL which is routed adjacent to a major tourist route and through several small settlements.

In the light of the detailed findings of the landscape and visual assessments therefore this recommendation supports the Environmental Route Options Report of a preference from a landscape and visual perspective for Route Option 2B combined with the Ard Dorch (AD) sub-route.

17

8. REFERENCES

Horner + Maclennan, 2011, Assessment of Highland Special Landscape Areas. The Highland Council

Landscape Institute, 2013, Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment: Third Edition (GLVIA3)

Stanton, C. 1996. Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 71

Scottish Natural Heritage (2010).The special qualities of the National Scenic Areas . Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No.374

Websites Used

Bing Mapping aerial photography - https://www.bing.com/maps/

Munro Magic - http://www.munromagic.com/

SNHi Site Link - http://www.snh.gov.uk/publications-data-and-research/snhi-information-service/

Walk Highlands - http://www.walkhighlands.co.uk/

18 APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1: LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

APPENDIX 1: LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

In order to identify potential effects to landscape character an appraisal of landscape sensitivity has been undertaken. The assessment has considered landscape character types (LCTs) within the study area, identified in the Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment (SNH, 1996).

Assessment Guidance

The assessment has been prepared with reference to the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (Third Edition), 2013, published by the Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (GLVIA3) and Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland (SNH / The Countryside Agency).

Professional Judgement

GLVIA3 places a strong emphasis on the importance of professional judgement in identifying and defining the significance of landscape effects. As part of this assessment, professional judgement has been used in combination with structured methods and criteria to evaluate landscape value, sensitivity, and magnitude and significance of effect.

Key Stages of Assessment

The GLVIA3 methodology is based on an appreciation of the existing landscape and the capacity of its key components to accept the proposed change; an understanding of the potential effects which could occur and how these could affect the key landscape components; and the potential to mitigate adverse effects. There are five key stages to the assessment:  Establishment of the baseline;  Appreciation of the Development;  Identification of key landscape receptors;  Identification of potential effects; and  Assessment of effect significance.

Establishment of the Baseline

Landscape character is a composite of physical, biological and cultural elements. Landform, hydrology, vegetation, land use pattern, cultural and historic features and associations combine to create a common 'sense of place' and identity which can be used to categorise the landscape into definable units (character areas). The level of detail and size of unit can be varied to reflect the scale of definition required. It can be applied at national, regional and local levels.

Establishment of the baseline conditions has been undertaken through combination of desk study and site appraisal. The following specific tasks have been undertaken:  A review of the relevant development plans and supplementary planning guidance;  Site appraisal and identification of Local Character Types (LCTs) and description of key landscape components or receptors;  Identification and review of any landscape designations within the study area;  Site appraisal and description of key landscape components or receptors; and

Appendix 1: Landscape Character Assessment Methodology Page 1

 Consideration of landscape value and sensitivity to change.

Relative Landscape Value

The relative value of the landscape is an important consideration in informing later judgement of the significance of effects. Value concerns the perceived importance of the landscape, when considered as a whole and within the context of the study area. Landscape value is established through consideration of the following factors:  Presence of landscape designations, other inventory or registered landscapes / landscape features or identified planning constraints;  The scenic quality of the landscape;  Perceptual aspects, such as wildness or tranquility;  Conservation interests such as cultural heritage features or associations, or if the landscape supports notable habitats or species;  Recreational value; and  Rarity either in the national or local context or if it is considered to be a particularly important example of a specific landscape type.

It should be noted that absence of a designation does not necessarily mean that a landscape or component is not highly valued as factors such as accessibility and local scarcity can render areas of nationally unremarkable quality, highly valuable as a local resource. Criteria for the allocation of perceived landscape value are outlined below:

High  The landscape is closely associated with features of international or national importance which are rare within the wider context;  The landscape is of high scenic quality and forms a key part of an important designated landscape or planning constraint; and/or  The landscape is an example of a scarce resource within the local context and is of considerable local importance for its, scenic quality, recreational opportunities or cultural heritage associations.

Medium  The landscape is associated with features of national or regional importance which are relatively common within the wider context;  The landscape forms part of a designated landscape or is associated with other features of importance but is not rare or distinctive within the local context; and/or  The landscape is one of a number within the local context appreciated for its scenic quality, recreational opportunities or cultural heritage associations.

Low  The landscape characteristics are common within the local and regional context and the landscape is not associated with any particular features or attributes considered to be important; and/or

Appendix 1: Landscape Character Assessment Methodology Page 2

 The landscape is of poor scenic quality and is not appreciated for any recreational or cultural associations.

Appreciation of the Proposed Development

Appreciation of the proposed development involves the accumulation of an appropriate knowledge of the proposal, its nature, scale and location within the baseline landscape, and any peripheral or ancillary features proposed. Analysis of the proposed activities and changes which would take place leads to an understanding of the potential effects that may occur on the landscape resource.

Identification of Key Landscape Receptors

The identification of landscape receptors is the first step in the analysis of the potential for significant landscape effects to take place. Landscape receptors comprise key characteristics or individual features which contribute to the value of the landscape and have the potential to be affected by the proposed development. Landscape receptors are identified through analysis of baseline characteristics when considered in relation to the effects which might result from a development of the type proposed.

Landscape Sensitivity

Landscape sensitivity considers the nature of the landscape and its ability to accommodate development of the type proposed without compromising its key characteristics and components. There are two aspects which are considered when establishing the landscape sensitivity:  Value: The baseline value of the landscape and the contributory value of individual landscape receptors to the landscape as a whole; and  Susceptibility to change: The ability of landscape receptors to accommodate development of the type proposed without changing the intrinsic qualities of the landscape as a whole.

Landscape sensitivity has been evaluated with reference to the subject areas above and using a three- point scale as follows:  High - A highly valued landscape of particularly distinctive character susceptible to relatively small changes of the type proposed;  Medium - A reasonably valued landscape with a composition and characteristics tolerant of some degree of change of the type proposed; and  Low - A relatively unimportant landscape which is potentially tolerant of a large degree of change of the type proposed.

Identification of Potential Effects

The second step in the assessment process involves the identification of potential effects which may occur as a result of the interaction of the effects of the proposed development with the identified landscape receptors. The assessment takes into account direct effects upon existing landscape elements, features and key characteristics and also indirect effects which may occur secondarily to changes affecting another landscape component or LCT.

Appendix 1: Landscape Character Assessment Methodology Page 3

Magnitude of Change

Magnitude of change concerns the degree to which the proposed development would alter the existing characteristics of the landscape and can be either a positive or a negative change. The appraisal of magnitude involves consideration of the nature and scale of the change which would occur in relation to each identified potential effect and also the duration and potential reversibility of the effect. These changes are then combined to evaluate a magnitude rating for the LCT as a whole.

Positive (+) or negative (-) magnitude of change is categorised on a four point scale as follows:  High - Notable change in landscape characteristics over an extensive area ranging to a very intensive change over a more limited area;  Medium - Perceptible change in landscape characteristics over an extensive area ranging to notable change in a localised area;  Low - Virtually imperceptible change in landscape characteristics over an extensive area or perceptible change in a localised area; and  Negligible - No discernible change in any landscape characteristics or components.

Assessment of Effect Significance

Evaluation of the predicted significance of effect has been carried out through analysis of the anticipated magnitude of change in relation to the identified landscape sensitivity and using a degree of professional judgement. The assessment takes into account identified effects upon existing landscape receptors and assesses the extent to which these would be lost or modified, in the context of their importance in determining the existing baseline character.

The prominence of the scheme components in the landscape will vary according to the prevailing weather conditions. The assessment has been carried out, as is best practice, by assuming the 'worst case' scenario i.e. on a clear, bright day in winter, when neither foreground deciduous foliage nor haze can interfere with the clarity of the view obtained.

Effect significance has been evaluated using a four point scale and using the following criteria to describe either positive or negative effects:  Major - The proposals would be at considerable variance with the landform, scale and pattern of the landscape and may become an influential feature, resulting in considerable alteration to scenic quality and large scale change to the intrinsic landscape character of the area;  Moderate - The proposals would be inconsistent with the landform, scale and pattern of the landscape and may become locally influential and/or result in a noticeable alteration to scenic quality and a degree of change to the intrinsic landscape character of the area;  Minor - The proposals would not quite fit with the scale, landform or local pattern of the landscape and may become locally influential but would result in an inappreciable alteration to scenic quality or change to the intrinsic landscape character of the area; and  Negligible - The proposals would result in a virtually imperceptible change in the existing landscape character of the area.

Appendix 1: Landscape Character Assessment Methodology Page 4

The above criteria and levels of impact represent points on a continuum. Where required, interim ratings, such as Minor-Moderate, have been used to indicate the anticipated level of impact.

For the purposes of the assessment effects with a rating of Moderate or above are considered to be significant.

Appendix 1: Landscape Character Assessment Methodology Page 5

APPENDIX 2: LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT (ROUTE OPTIONS 2A AND 2B)

APPENDIX 2: LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT (ROUTE OPTIONS 2A and 2B)

A) Landscape Designations

OHL= Overhead Line

Important note: The study area for the LVIA is based on an offset of 3km from the route centreline. After the initial route options appraisal and bearing in mind the nature of the development, it was decided that this would encompass the area within which any significant effects upon landscape character and visual amenity could occur.

Due to the alignment not being known at this stage a Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) diagram has not been run in this instance. As a result this comparative route assessment is based on the assumption that the alignment will follow the centreline of the Corridor and assumed intervisibilty has been based upon site-based observation rather than desk-based mapping.

Trotternish and Tianavaig Special Landscape Area (SLA) Reference Horner + Maclennan (2011) Assessment of Highland Special Landscape Areas; Report to The Documents Highland Council in partnership with Scottish Natural Heritage Stanton, C (1996) Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 71. Description An upland SLA of nationally recognised dramatic and rugged mountains including the Cuillins and Blabheinn with a foreground of rounded hills and U-shaped glens. Special Qualities N.B. Only the most southerly end of this north-south linear SLA features in the study area in “The Braes” area adjacent to Tianavaig Bay north of Peinachorrain. Consequently only those qualities which are manifested in this area are reviewed here.

Dynamic Landslip Character  One of the most spectacular landscapes in Britain, resulting from a distinct land slip topography that results in a dramatic assemblage of rock outcrops, cliffs and pinnacle features.  From the ridge crest, a succession of basalt lava layers create to the east, a steep escarpment dramatically accentuated by a sequence of gigantic rotational landslips.

Ridgeline Spine and Coastal Fringe  The Trotternish Ridge, the longest continuous ridge in Skye, forms the backbone of the island’s northern peninsula, and dramatically defines and separates the landscape characters to its west and east. The ridge is somewhat lower than that of the Cuillins but is still grand in scale and accessible in a wider range of weather conditions.  The elevated spine of the Trotternish ridge and its associated moorland core results in a narrow coastal fringe where settlements and communication routes are concentrated. Consequently, these have a close relationship with the Minch and the Sound of Raasay from elevated locations above the coastal cliffs, at lower levels overlooking the more intimate smaller bay at Tianavaig.

Landscape Value and A landscape valued for scenic quality and dramatic geomorphological characteristics. The simple Susceptibility structure of the landscape is considered highly susceptible to linear and vertical elements of the type proposed; however there is existing linear infrastructure running along its periphery in places (roads and some OHLs) locally reducing its susceptibility to change in these areas. ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPE EFFECTS Landscape Receptors The principal aspects of this landscape which may be affected by the proposed development comprise:  Elevated spinal ridge;  Dramatic coastal cliff landscape;  More intimate bay at Tianavaig; and

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment Page 1

 Settlements and infrastructure routes on edge/ along coast.

Landscape This is a locally valued landscape of simple but dramatic landscape structure considered highly Sensitivity susceptible to linear and vertical elements of the type proposed; however there is existing linear infrastructure running along its periphery in places (roads and OHLs) locally reducing its susceptibility to change in these areas. Landscape sensitivity is therefore considered to be Medium- High. Potential Effects Potential indirect effects which may result to this landscape comprise:  Removal of existing OHL.  Introduction of replacement OHL. Magnitude of Route Option 2A: The proposals will replace a similar existing OHL on opposite side of Loch Change Sligachan, and change will be indirect. Overall the magnitude of change on this Designation is considered to be Negligible due to distance and topographic screening. Route Option 2B: The existing OHL on opposite side of Loch Sligachan will be removed and a replacement OHL constructed running largely along the coastal edge, before running inland, with indirect change limited by topographic screening to The Braes area within the SLA. Overall the magnitude of change will be indirect Low (-) during construction and operation. Effect Significance Route Option 2A: The predicted negligible magnitude of change on a landscape of medium-high sensitivity is considered likely to lead to indirect Negligible landscape effects during construction and operation, which would not be significant. Route Option 2B: The predicted low (-) magnitude of change on a landscape of medium-high sensitivity is considered likely to lead to indirect Minor landscape effects during construction and operation, which would not be significant.

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment Page 2

The Cuillin Hills National Scenic Area (NSA) and Cuillin Wild Land Area (WLA) (N.B. Since these two areas are more or less contiguous within the study area and since wild land qualities are a constituent part of the character of the NSA, they have been considered together for the purposes of this study.) Reference Scottish Natural Heritage (2010).The special qualities of the National Scenic Areas. Scottish Natural Documents Heritage Commissioned Report No.374. Stanton, C (1996) Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 71. Description An upland NSA of nationally recognised dramatic and rugged mountains including the Cuillins and Blabheinn with a foreground of rounded hills and U-shaped glens. Special Qualities  Magnificent mountain scenery;  The contrast and complement of the Black and Red Cuillin;  The surrounding wild landscape, a fitting foil for the mountains;  Iconic images of crofting townships with dramatic backdrops;  The Cuillin Ridge, a landmark throughout the north west;  The ever-changing weather;  A place of inspiration; and

 The most challenging mountains in Scotland.

Landscape Value and A landscape valued for scenic quality and remote, wild characteristics. The simple structure of the Susceptibility landscape is considered highly susceptible to linear and vertical elements of the type proposed; however there is existing linear infrastructure running along its periphery in places (roads and OHLs) locally reducing its susceptibility to change in these areas. ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPE EFFECTS Landscape Receptors The principal aspects of this landscape which may be affected by the proposed development comprise:  Sense of wildness and remoteness;  Sense of simplicity of form and uninterrupted skyline;  Largely uninhabited interior; and  Settlements and infrastructure routes on edge/ along coast. Landscape This is a highly valued landscape of simple landscape structure considered highly susceptible to Sensitivity linear and vertical elements of the type proposed; however there is existing linear infrastructure running through it or along its periphery in places (roads and OHLs) locally reducing its susceptibility to change in these areas. Landscape sensitivity is therefore considered to be generally High, but locally Medium-High. Potential Effects Potential direct and indirect effects which may result to this landscape comprise:  Removal of existing OHL.  Introduction of replacement OHL. Magnitude of Route Option 2A: The proposals will replace a similar existing OHL, and change will be both direct Change and indirect, overall the magnitude of change on this Designation is considered to be Low (-) Route Option 2B: The existing OHL will be removed and a replacement OHL constructed running largely along the coastal edge, with direct change limited to Sconser, Luib and Dunan areas. Overall the magnitude of change will be direct (limited) but mostly indirect Low-Medium (+) during construction and operation. Effect Significance Route Option 2A: The predicted low (-) magnitude of change on a landscape of locally medium-high sensitivity is considered likely to lead to an indirect and direct Minor-Moderate Adverse landscape effect during construction and operation, which would not be significant. Route Option 2B: The predicted low-medium (+) magnitude of change on a landscape of locally medium-high sensitivity is considered likely to lead to indirect and direct Moderate Beneficial landscape effects during construction and operation, which would be significant.

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment Page 3

B) Landscape Character Types (LCTs)

LCT 1: ANGULAR MOUNTAIN RANGE Reference Stanton, C (1996) Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. Documents 71. Description An upland LCT of nationally recognised dramatic and rugged mountains including the Cuillins and Blabheinn. Key Characteristics  High mountain range with an angular and erect profile forming a jagged skyline;  Sense of openness, wildness and grandeur;  Prominence in distant views from other areas;  Dominant exposure of hard, coarse and dark rock;  Vast corries and deep, U shaped valleys; and

 Lack of habitation leading to a perception of remoteness and wildness. Landscape Value and Distinct landscape in the national context and highly valued for scenic quality, wildness and Susceptibility recreational opportunities as indicated by its inclusion within The Cuillin Hills NSA and Cuillins WLA. Large in scale and therefore theoretically able to accommodate this type of development but in practice any development is likely to form a visual detraction and affect the wild and dramatic character. ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPE EFFECTS Landscape Receptors The principal aspects of this landscape which may be affected by the proposed development comprise:  High scenic quality and sense of openness, wildness and grandeur. Landscape This is a highly valued landscape of distinctive qualities which despite its scale has high susceptibility Sensitivity to change of the type proposed. Landscape sensitivity is therefore considered to be High. Potential Effects Potential indirect effects which may result to this landscape comprise:  Introduction outwith this designated landscape of slightly larger replacement OHL.  Removal of existing OHL. Magnitude of Route Option 2A: The proposals will replace a similar existing OHL, and change will be indirect, Change overall the magnitude of change on this LCT is considered to be Negligible-Low (-). Route Option 2B: The existing OHL will be removed, and a replacement OHL constructed a considerable distance away along the coastal edge; overall the magnitude of change will be indirect and Minor (+) during construction and operation. Effect Significance Route Option 2A: The predicted negligible-low(-) magnitude of change on a landscape of high sensitivity is considered likely to lead to an indirect Minor Adverse landscape effect during construction and operation, which would not be significant. Route Option 2B: The predicted minor (+) magnitude of change on a landscape of high sensitivity is considered likely to lead to an indirect Moderate Beneficial landscape effect during construction and operation, which would be significant and beneficial.

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment Page 4

LCT 2: SMOOTH STEPPED MOORLAND Reference Stanton, C (1996) Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. Documents 71. Description This comprises a gently undulating and open LCT, with large areas characterised by stepped landform, with an emphasis on horizontal planes of skyline and midground horizons, and lack of visual focal points. Key Characteristics  Gently undulating landform with occasional lochans with some areas portraying a distinctive stepped landform and repetition of open moorland and ridges;  Heather moorland and improved grassland, grazed by sheep and deer, with areas of scrub woodland along watercourses and coniferous woodland plantations;  Sparsely settled with occasional settlements confined to coasts or valleys;  Evidence of past settlements, such as ruined buildings, ridge and furrow marks, peat cuttings;  Simple visual composition with few focal points and dominance of rolling skyline;  Sense of exposure and restfulness within this open landscape where long range views are experienced and there is a strong awareness of changing weather;  Difficulty perceiving scale and distance related to lack of features to scale against; and

 Infrastructure routes including overhead lines provide visual foci cutting through the landscape. Landscape Value and An LCT valued for open and exposed character with parts included within the Cuillin WLA, The Cuillin Susceptibility Hills NSA, and Trotternish and Tianavaig SLA. The perceived remoteness experienced within this LCT is sensitive to change of the type proposed, but edges of the LCT, or areas relating to other linear features, such as roads or forest edges and the grain of the landform, are likely to be less susceptible to this type of proposal. ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPE EFFECTS Landscape Receptors The principal aspects of this landscape which may be affected by the proposed development comprise:  Open, exposed character;  Simple visual composition; and  Existing infrastructure. Landscape This is a valued landscape with an open, exposed character containing linear features, such as roads, Sensitivity forest edges and OHLs rendering it less susceptible to this type of proposal. Landscape sensitivity is therefore considered to be Medium. Potential Effects Potential direct and indirect effects which may result to this landscape comprise:  Removal of existing OHL; and  Introduction of slightly larger replacement OHL. Magnitude of Route Option 2A: The proposals will replace a similar existing OHL, and change will be indirect, Change overall the magnitude of change on this LCT is considered to be Negligible-Low (-). Route Option 2B: The existing OHL will be removed to the south, and a replacement OHL constructed running along the edge of this LCTs interface with LCT3 (Rugged Massif) at the northern end of the route; overall the magnitude of change will be direct and indirect Minor-Moderate (-) during construction and operation. Effect Significance Route 2A: The predicted negligible-low(-) magnitude of change on a landscape of medium sensitivity is considered likely to lead to an indirect Minor Adverse landscape effects during construction and operation, which would not be significant. Route Option 2B: The predicted minor-moderate (-) magnitude of change on a landscape of medium sensitivity is considered likely to lead to an indirect and direct Minor-Moderate Adverse landscape effects during construction and operation, which would be not be significant.

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment Page 5

LCT 3: RUGGED MASSIF Reference Stanton, C (1996) Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. Documents 71. Description A LCT of large broad based hill ranges and U-shaped valleys. Key Characteristics  Large hills with broad bases and gentle slopes, creating undulating skylines;  Lack of individual peaks and consequent difficulty perceiving size of hills;  Hill ranges separated by U-shaped valleys;  Sense of exposure and limited presence of habitation; and

 Mottled textures and varied ground conditions including pockets of wet ground and deep peat. Landscape Value and A highly valued LCT with parts included within the Cuillin Hills NSA, and Cuillin WLA. Its exposed Susceptibility sense of place and large-scale landscape features are generally highly sensitive to the introduction of this type of development; however there is existing linear infrastructure running through it or along its periphery in places (roads and OHLs) locally reducing its susceptibility to change in these areas. ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPE EFFECTS Landscape Receptors The principal aspects of this landscape which may be affected by the proposed development comprise:  Sense of exposure and limited presence of habitation; and  Existing infrastructure. Landscape This is a highly valued landscape of large hills separated by U-shaped valleys containing some linear Sensitivity infrastructure features, such as roads, forest edges and OHLs rendering it less susceptible to this type of proposal. Landscape sensitivity is therefore considered to be Medium. Potential Effects Potential direct and indirect effects which may result to this landscape comprise:  Removal of existing OHL; and  Introduction of replacement OHL. Magnitude of Route Option 2A: The proposals will replace a similar existing OHL, and change will be both direct Change and indirect, overall the magnitude of change on this LCT is considered to be Low (-). Route Option 2B: The existing OHL will be removed and a replacement OHL constructed running along the edge of this LCTs interface with LCT2 (Smooth Stepped Moorland) west of the Braes at the northern end of the route; through the centre in the Moll area; and along the periphery at Luib/ Ard Dorch. Overall the magnitude of change will be direct and indirect Moderate (-) during construction and operation. Effect Significance Route Option 2A: The predicted low(-) magnitude of change on a landscape of medium sensitivity is considered likely to lead to an indirect and direct Minor-Moderate Adverse landscape effect during construction and operation, which would not be significant. Route Option 2B: The predicted moderate (-) magnitude of change on a landscape of medium sensitivity is considered likely to lead to an indirect and direct Moderate Adverse landscape effect during construction and operation, which would be significant.

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment Page 6

LCT 4: ROUNDED HILLS Reference Stanton, C (1996) Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. Documents 71. Description An LCT of rounded hills and U-shaped valleys. Key Characteristics  Groups of rounded, smooth hills with deep crevices;  Pink colours of exposed granite;  Sense of simplicity of form and uninterrupted skyline, creating “slow ‘relaxed’ visual movement”; and

 Largely uninhabited interior, with some settlements and infrastructure routes on edge or along coast. Landscape Value and A landscape valued for scenic quality and wild characteristics and included with The Cuillin Hills NSA Susceptibility and Cuillin WLA. The simple structure of the landscape is considered highly susceptible to linear and vertical elements of the type proposed; however there is existing linear infrastructure running through it or along its periphery in places (roads and OHLs) locally reducing its susceptibility to change in these areas. ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPE EFFECTS Landscape Receptors The principal aspects of this landscape which may be affected by the proposed development comprise:  Sense of simplicity of form and uninterrupted skyline;  Largely uninhabited interior;  Settlements and infrastructure routes on edge/ along coast. Landscape This is a highly valued landscape of simple landscape structure considered highly susceptible to Sensitivity linear and vertical elements of the type proposed; however there is existing linear infrastructure running through it or along its periphery in places (roads and OHLs) locally reducing its susceptibility to change in these areas. Landscape sensitivity is therefore considered to be Medium-High. Potential Effects Potential direct and indirect effects which may result to this landscape comprise:  Removal of existing OHL; and  Introduction of replacement OHL. Magnitude of Route Option 2A: The proposals will replace a similar existing OHL, and change will be both direct Change and indirect, overall the magnitude of change on this LCT is considered to be Low (-) Route Option 2B: The existing OHL will be removed and a replacement OHL constructed running largely along the coastal edge, with direct change limited to Sconser area. Overall the magnitude of change will be direct (limited) but mostly indirect Low-Medium (+) during construction and operation. Effect Significance Route Option 2A: The predicted low(-) magnitude of change on a landscape of medium-high sensitivity is considered likely to lead to an indirect and direct Minor-Moderate Adverse landscape effect during construction and operation, which would not be significant. Route Option 2B: The predicted low-medium (+) magnitude of change on a landscape of medium- high sensitivity is considered likely to lead to indirect and direct Moderate Beneficial landscape effects during construction and operation, which would be significant.

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment Page 7

LCT 5: ROCKY MOORLAND AND ROCKY UNDULATING PLATEAU Reference Stanton, C (1996) Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. Documents 71. Description A combination of the sub-types Rocky Moorland and Rocky Undulating Plateau, this comprises an open LCT of undulating landform and rocky outcrops with lochans. Key Characteristics  Undulating landform and rocky outcrops with lochans,  Quiet, rugged, remote character and sense of openness; and

 Attention drawn to foreground features and there are no focal points and landscape patterns can appear random and undifferentiated. Landscape Value and This open and remote LCT is valued for scenic quality and areas overlap with the parts of The Cuillin Susceptibility Hills NSA. However, its remote landscape character and sense of openness, although sensitive to the introduction of new elements, particularly infrastructure routes, is already compromised in some locations by existing roads and OHLs. ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPE EFFECTS Landscape Receptors The principal aspects of this landscape which may be affected by the proposed development comprise:  Quiet, rugged, remote character and sense of openness. Landscape This is a valued landscape of simple landscape structure due to its remote landscape character and Sensitivity sense of openness; although sensitive to the introduction of new elements, it is already compromised in some locations by existing roads and OHLs. Landscape sensitivity in the study area is therefore considered to be Medium. Potential Effects Potential direct and indirect effects which may result to this landscape comprise:  Removal of existing OHL; and  Introduction of replacement OHL. Magnitude of Route Option 2A: The proposals will replace a similar existing OHL, with limited direct change and Change more widespread indirect change, overall the magnitude of change on this LCT is considered to be Low (-). Route Option 2B: The existing OHL will be removed and a replacement OHL constructed, with a minor element of direct change at its intersection with Route Option 1A. Overall the magnitude of change will be direct (limited) but mostly indirect Low (+) during construction and operation. Effect Significance Route Option 2A: The predicted low(-) magnitude of change on a landscape of medium sensitivity is considered likely to lead to an indirect and direct Minor-Moderate Adverse landscape effect during construction and operation, which would not be significant. Route Option 2B: The predicted low (+) magnitude of change on a landscape of medium sensitivity is considered likely to lead to indirect and direct Minor-Moderate Beneficial landscape effect during construction and operation, which would not be significant.

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment Page 8

LCT 6: LINEAR CROFTING Reference Stanton, C (1996) Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. Documents 71. Description A distinctive LCT with simple, balanced, and repetitive visual patterns created by parallel linearity of roads, buildings, landform and crofting field layouts. Key Characteristics  Historic sense of place relating to crofting character of buildings and landuse;  Repetitive, linear pattern of development, created by arrangement of buildings, field boundaries and landform;  Sense of linear visual movement along access roads, towards the coast, with no distinct settlement focus / centre;  Simple visual composition of elements in horizontal bands, most notable in views from opposite shore / slope;  Visual balance created by linear settlement pattern and parallel linear crofting; and  Visual patterns emphasised in certain weather conditions (e.g. low cloud and low light). Landscape Value and A distinct LCT valued for scenic quality and cultural heritage value. Existing infrastructure lessens Susceptibility sensitivity to this type of proposal with potential to accommodate in some areas. Careful routing of proposal would be required as landscape patterns and visual composition sensitive to change if not sited appropriately. ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPE EFFECTS Landscape Receptors The principal aspects of this landscape which may be affected by the proposed development comprise:  Simple visual composition of elements in horizontal bands, most notable in views from opposite shore / slope;  Visual balance created by linear settlement pattern and parallel linear crofting. Landscape This is a valued landscape due to its distinctive features and cultural heritage associations; however Sensitivity OHLs already feature. Landscape sensitivity in the study area is therefore considered to be Medium.

Potential Effects Potential indirect effects which may result to this landscape comprise:  Removal of existing OHL; and  Introduction of replacement OHL. Magnitude of Route Option 2A: The proposals will replace a similar existing OHL, on the opposite side of Loch Change Sligachan, along a similar route. Overall the magnitude of change on this LCT is therefore considered to be Low (-). Route Option 2B: The existing OHL will be removed and a replacement OHL constructed on a new alignment, with some potential for limited direct change and more widespread indirect change. Overall the magnitude of change on this LCT is therefore considered to be Medium (-). Effect Significance Route Option 2A: The predicted low magnitude of change on a landscape of medium sensitivity is considered likely to lead to direct and indirect Minor adverse landscape effects during construction and operation, which would not be significant. Route Option 2B: The predicted medium magnitude of change on a landscape of medium sensitivity is considered likely to lead to direct and indirect Moderate adverse landscape effects during construction and operation, which would be significant.

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment Page 9

LCT 7: CONIFEROUS WOODLAND PLANTATION Reference Stanton, C (1996) Skye and Lochalsh Landscape Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. Documents 71. Description An LCT dominated by coniferous plantation and other forestry related landscape features. Key Characteristics  Coniferous forest plantation masking underlying landform;  Forest related landscape features including plough lines, forest access tracks, overhead line wayleave corridors, harvesting and fencing;  Notable presence of human activity within changing landscape;  Views mostly enclosed and contained by tree cover;  Sense of monotony, control, repetition and uniformity of geometric shapes, colours and textures; and

 Uniform and repetitive textures, colours and patterns. Landscape Value and Landscape of low value potentially tolerant of a large degree of change of the type proposed. Susceptibility ASSESSMENT OF LANDSCAPE EFFECTS Landscape Receptors The principal aspects of this landscape which may be affected by the proposed development comprise:  Clearance shapes resulting from wayleave felling; and  Access track routes and resulting division of space. Landscape Landscape sensitivity in the study area is considered to be Low. Sensitivity

Potential Effects Potential indirect effects which may result to this landscape comprise:  Removal of existing OHL; and  Introduction of replacement OHL. Magnitude of Route Option 2A: The proposals will replace a similar existing OHL, along a similar route, with Change limited or no direct change (depending on alignment south of Sconser and near Broadford Sub- Station) and also limited indirect change due to topographic and tree screening. Overall the magnitude of change on this LCT is therefore considered to be Negligible. Route Option 2B: The proposals will replace a similar existing OHL with a new OHL along a different route to the existing, with limited direct change (depending on exact alignment south of Sconser, Moll and in Glen Varragill) and indirect change due to topographic and tree screening, and distance. Overall the magnitude of change on this LCT is therefore considered to be Low (-). Effect Significance Route Option 2A: The predicted negligible magnitude of change on a landscape of low sensitivity is considered likely to lead to indirect Negligible landscape effects during construction and operation, which would not be significant. Route Option 2B: The predicted low magnitude of change on a landscape of low sensitivity is considered likely to lead to indirect Minor adverse landscape effects during construction and operation, which would not be significant.

Appendix 2: Landscape Character Assessment Page 10

APPENDIX 3: VISUAL EFFECTS METHODOLOGY

APPENDIX 3: VISUAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Assessment Guidance

The assessment has been prepared with reference to the ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, 3rd Edition, 2013) (GLVIA3).

Professional Judgement

GLVIA3 places a strong emphasis on the importance of professional judgement in identifying and defining the significance of visual effects. As part of this assessment, professional judgement has been used in combination with structured methods and criteria to evaluate sensitivity, magnitude and significance of effect. The assessment has been undertaken and verified by Chartered Landscape Architects to provide a robust and consistent approach.

Key Stages of Assessment

GLVIA3 suggests that visual effects are assessed from a clear understanding of the proposed development and any mitigation measures which are being adopted. Familiarity with the site and the extent, nature and expectation of existing views is also a key factor in establishing the visual sensitivity in terms of the proposed development. The guidelines require evaluation of magnitude of change to views experienced by sensitive receptors, comprising individuals living, working, travelling and carrying out other activities within the landscape, and subsequent evaluation of effect significance.

There are four key stages to the assessment:

 Establishment of the baseline;

 Appreciation of the Development;

 Analysis of visual receptors and potential effects; and

 Assessment of effect significance.

Establishment of the Baseline

Establishment of the baseline conditions has been undertaken through combination of desk study and site appraisal. The following specific tasks have been undertaken:

 A review of the relevant development plans;

 Identification of sensitive visual receptors; and

 Field survey to establish the nature and context of individual visual receptors and the key elements and qualities of the existing view.

Receptors

For there to be a visual effect there is the need for a viewer. Those experiencing views are referred to as visual receptors. Locations where such receptors may experience potentially significant

Appendix 3: Visual Assessment Methodology Page 1

effects such as residential and other buildings vehicular and railway routes, and pedestrian routeways and popular vantage points have been included in the assessment.

Such potentially significantly affected receptors have been identified through targeted field survey.

Appreciation of the Development Proposed

Appreciation of the proposed development involves the accumulation of a thorough knowledge of the proposal, its nature, scale and location within the baseline landscape, and any peripheral or ancillary features proposed. The consideration of any mitigation in the vicinity is also important in the understanding of potential longer term effects.

Analysis of Visual Receptors and Potential Effects

Preparation of the visual baseline is followed by the systematic identification of likely significant effects on the potential visual receptors. This is a two-fold process, giving consideration to how effects may arise from aspects of the proposed development, and how these changes affect the existing baseline view.

Locations of potential visual receptors within the study area were visited and key information on the nature, composition and characteristics of the existing view experienced recorded. Consideration is given to the likely perceived value of a particular view to the viewer, taking into account the nature of the receptor and the potential activity they may be involved in, and factors such as elevation, extent and key features or attractions which may feature in the view.

Visual Receptor Sensitivity

The evaluation of visual sensitivity considers both the perceived value of the existing view to the receptor, and the susceptibility of the visual receptor to change. Consideration is therefore given to the following;

 the susceptibility of the receptor to change, which is a combination of the nature of the receptor and the potential activity they may be involved in;

 the perceived value of a particular view to the viewer, which takes into account visual context, including key features and attractors / detractors which may feature in the existing view and affect the value of that view to the receptor; and

 the aspect and direction of change in respect of the most valued views from the receptor location including the relative elevation compared to the changed element of the view.

In this assessment sensitivity is ranked as follows (adapted from GLVIA3 methodology):-

High Sensitivity

 Receptors in Dwellings where the changes form part of a valued view and;

 Receptors on Footpaths, tracks and vantage points where the changes form part of a valued view.

Appendix 3: Visual Assessment Methodology Page 2

Medium Sensitivity

 Receptors in Dwellings where the changes form a part of a less valued view;

 Receptors on Footpaths, tracks and vantage points where the changes form a part of a less valued view;

 Receptors on Roads where the changes form part of a valued view;

 Receptors in Farm buildings not used as dwellings and Industrial buildings where the changes form part of a valued view.

Low Sensitivity

 Receptors in Dwellings where the changes form a part of a unvalued view;

 Receptors on Footpaths, tracks and vantage points where the changes form a part of a unvalued view; and

 Receptors on Roads where the changed landscape is a less valued element in the view.

GLVIA3 recommends that the criteria used to assess the magnitude of change are set out as reference points along a continuum and it is suggested that magnitude is assessed as high, medium and low on this continuum. It is important to remember that references to high, medium and low magnitude are only reference points along this continuum. In the assessment of visual effect the magnitude of change is considered in terms of the type of change taking place in a view from a receptor and the degree of change which will take place in that view.

Magnitude of change, which can be either positive or negative, is measured on the following scale, (adapted from GLVIA3 methodology):-

 High Magnitude: where the development causes a significant change in the existing view;

 Medium Magnitude: where the development will cause a noticeable change in the existing view;

 Low Magnitude: where the development will cause a perceptible change in the existing view; and

 Negligible: where the development will cause no discernible change in the existing view.

Assessment of Effect Significance

The level of effect identified concerns the importance of changes resulting from the proposed development. Evaluation of the visual effect is based on consideration of the magnitude of change in relation to visual sensitivity, taking into account proposed mitigation measures, and is established using professional judgement. The assessment takes into account likely changes to the visual composition, including the extent to which new features would distract or screen existing elements in the view or disrupt the scale, structure or focus of the existing view.

The prominence of the scheme components in the view will vary according to the prevailing weather conditions. The assessment has been carried out, as is good practice, by assuming the

Appendix 3: Visual Assessment Methodology Page 3

'worst case' scenario i.e. on a clear, bright day in winter, when neither foreground deciduous foliage nor haze can interfere with the clarity of the view obtained.

Effect significance has been evaluated using a four point scale and using the following criteria. Please note that effects cab be either adverse (negative) or beneficial (positive). For clarity in the criteria below, positive criteria are indicated in brackets and italicised.

 Major - The proposed development would become a prominent and very detracting (positive) feature and/ or would result in a very noticeable deterioration (improvement) to an existing highly valued and well composed view;

 Moderate - The proposed development would introduce some detracting (positive)features to an existing highly valued and well composed view, and would be prominent (less prominent) within a pleasing or less well composed view, and/or would result in a noticeable deterioration (improvement) to the view;

 Minor - The proposed development would form a perceptible but not detracting (positive) feature within a pleasing or valued view or would be a more prominent (less prominent) feature within a poorly composed view of limited value, resulting in a small deterioration (improvement) to the existing view; and

 Negligible - The proposed development would form a barely perceptible feature within the existing view and/or would not result in any discernible deterioration (or improvement) to the view.

The above criteria and levels of impact represent points on a continuum. Where required, interim ratings, such as Minor-Moderate, have been used to indicate the anticipated level of impact.

For the purposes of this assessment, effects of Moderate, Moderate-Major or Major are considered to be significant.

Appendix 3: Visual Assessment Methodology Page 4

APPENDIX 4A: VISUAL EFFECTS TABLES – ROUTE OPTION 2A

APPENDIX 4A: VISUAL EFFECTS TABLES; ROUTE OPTION 2A N.B. OHL = OVERHEAD LINE

Important Note: The study area for the LVIA is based on an offset of 3km from the route centreline. After the initial route options appraisal and bearing in mind the nature of the development, it was decided that this would encompass the area within which any significant effects upon landscape character and visual amenity could occur. Due to the alignment not being known at this stage a Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) diagram has not been run in this instance. As a result this comparative route assessment is based on the assumption that the alignment will follow the centreline of the Corridor and assumed intervisibilty has been based upon site-based observation rather than desk-based mapping.

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL

Operational Operational Construction (m) Construction

RECEPTORS IN BUILDING LOCATIONS

Strollamus N.E. facing across road Existing trident wood towards Scalpay. pole OHL to be replaced Small linear Hillside to rear is with slightly larger Medium- B1 settlement of 1 & 8 cluttered with existing wood pole OHL along a 100-150 Low Low Minor Minor Low 1.5 storey detached OHLs, reducing similar alignment. houses and cottages sensitivity. Would blend into existing OHL clutter. Rear views.

Dunan N.E. facing, towards Existing trident wood Scalpay. Steeply rising pole OHL to be replaced Small linear hillside and foreground with slightly larger B2 4 Low 100-150 Low Low Minor Minor settlement of 1 & trees largely screen wood pole OHL along a 1.5 storey detached views of existing OHLs similar alignment. Rear/ houses and cottages higher up slope and to uphill views. and outbuildings rear.

Ard Dorch N.E. facing, towards Limited or no view of Small linear Scalpay. 33kV OHL on proposed Route 2A settlement of 1.5 uphill side of road. OHL. 1000- B3a storey detached 6 Low Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible 2000 houses. All but one set down low in landscape, below road on loch side. Appendix 4A: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2A) Page 1

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

Luib W-E facing across Strath Existing trident wood Larger nucleated Mor and north facing, pole OHL to be replaced settlement of 1 & 1.5 overlooking Loch with slightly larger storey detached Ainort. Two existing wood pole OHL along a Medium- Minor- B3b houses and cottages 18 OHLs run through Medium similar alignment. 50-200 Low Minor High Moderate clustered along sides valley. Mostly front views. of Strath Mor as it emerges at bay overlooking Loch Ainort.

Sconser (south end) Views over Narrows of Existing trident wood Two 1.5 storey Raasay. Existing OHLs pole OHL to be replaced 200 B4 houses and Club 2 and Quarry feature in Medium with slightly larger Low Low Minor Minor

House (Skye G.C.) views to rear and wood pole OHL along a oblique views to east. similar alignment. Mostly rear views.

Quarry Elevated north-west Existing trident wood facing views up the pole OHL to be replaced Offices and Narrows of Raasay with slightly larger 200-300 B5 Outbuildings 1 Low wood pole OHL along a Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

similar alignment. Mostly side/ oblique relatively distant views.

Front views across Luib No view of proposed Moll na Moll to Scalpay. Fish Route 2A OHL. B6a Fish Farm Base 1 farm in foreground. Low Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible 2000

Appendix 4A: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2A) Page 2

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

Moll Front views across Luib No view of proposed B6b 2-storey House; !- 2 na Moll to Scalpay. Fish Low Route 2A OHL. Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible storey croft farm in foreground. 2000

Sconser (east end) Low-level front-facing On south side of road, northerly views across existing OHL removed Sconser Lodge (2 Narrows of Raasay. and replaced with storey hotel) Some trees to slightly larger OHL Sconser Lodge rear.Views of existing alongside existing 33kv Medium- B7 (2storey self - 4 OHLs to rear, across OHL retained. 50-100 Low Low Minor Minor Low catering) road. Limited side views One 1-storey house of apparatus relating to One 1.5 storey house existing crossing from Situated below and 1.5 storey house. to the north of the road.

Sconser (central) Mostly north west Existing OHL removed -Fish Farm shore slightly elevated views and replaced with base over Loch Sligachan. slightly larger OHL high B8 -Ferry Terminal 22 Existing OHL high up on Low up on slope to rear. 500 Low Low Minor Minor -1 &1.5 storey slope to rear. detached houses and cottages

Sconser (west end) Mostly north west Existing OHL removed slightly elevated views and replaced with -1 &1.5 storey over Loch Sligachan. slightly larger OHL up B9 8 Low 300- 500 Low Low Minor Minor detached houses, Existing OHL high up on slope to rear. cottages slope to rear. and outbuildings

Appendix 4A: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2A) Page 3

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

Sligachan Hotel and Hotel in hollow in Existing OHL removed Camp Site landscape behind and and replaced with to south of road. Camp slightly larger OHL as it Site on loch (north) side crosses glen. of roasd but also set Low- B10 2 500-750 Low Low Minor Minor low in landscape. In Medium both cases, side-on views obtained down glen featuring OHL as it crosses glen and rises up on both sides.

Sligachan Lodge and Lodge has open, Oblique but elevated Bunkhouse elevated front north- view of existing OHL facing views across being removed and 2 storey detached head of glen; with OHL replaced with slightly house, self- catering. crossing glen before Medium- larger OHL as it crosses Minor- Minor- B11 2 750 Low Low rising up other side. High glen. Moderate Moderate 1-storey detached Views from bunk-house timber building, self- are screened/ filtered catering to rear of by foreground lodge the above. and surrounding trees.

Peinachorrain Relatively distant view Existing trident wood Linear settlement of existing OHL and pole OHL to be replaced featuring 1, 1.5, and 33kv OHL on opposite with slightly larger 2-storey houses/ side of Loch at Sconser. wood pole OHL along a crofts and 33kv crosses loch by similar alignment on B12 1 Low 1000 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible outbuildings below marine cable then rises opposite side of loch. road on south side up slope through village.

Appendix 4A: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2A) Page 4

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

RECEPTORS AT OUTDOOR SITES

Lay-By, A87 above Elevated north-easterly Existing trident wood Loch Ainort views down length of pole OHL to be replaced Loch Ainort. Also large with slightly larger waterfall to south. wood pole OHL along a O1 1 Trident OHL and 33kv High similar alignment. 500 Low Low Moderate Moderate OHL run across northerly field of view; partly skylined across mid-ground morainic ridge at head of Loch.

Isle of Skye Towards Raasay. Trident OHL removed O2 Golf Course 1 Quarry and OHL feature Medium and replaced with 200-300 Low Low Minor Minor in inland views. slightly larger OHL to rear. Slightly elevated views Sligachan Parking across the head of the Trident OHL removed Area/ Picnic Area/ glen. OHL features in and replaced with Minor- Minor- 03 1 High 500 Low Low Vantage Point mid-ground as it crosses slightly larger OHL Moderate Moderate glen and rises up other side.

RECEPTORS ON ROUTEWAYS

N.E. facing across road Existing trident wood A87 Strollamus towards Scalpay. pole OHL to be replaced Hillside to rear is with slightly larger Medium- R1a 1 cluttered with existing wood pole OHL along a 100-150 Low Low Minor Minor Low OHLs, reducing similar alignment. sensitivity. Would blend into existing OHL clutter.

Appendix 4A: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2A) Page 5

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

A87 Dunan N.E. facing, towards Existing trident wood Scalpay. Steeply rising pole OHL to be replaced R1b 1 hillside and foreground Low with slightly larger 100-150 Low Low Minor Minor trees largely screen wood pole OHL along a views of existing OHLs similar alignment. Uphill higher up slope. views.

A87 Ard Dorch N.E. facing, towards Limited or no view of 1000- R1c 1 Scalpay. 33kV OHL on Low proposed Route 2A Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible uphill side of road. OHL. 2000

A87 Luib Village views and across Existing trident wood Loch Ainort. Two OHLs pole OHL to be replaced Minor- Minor- R1d 1 feature in view. Medium with slightly larger 50-200 Low Low Moderate Moderate wood pole OHL along a similar alignment.

A87 Loch Ainort Views to Cuillins, rising Existing trident wood above head of Loch pole OHL to be replaced Ainort, dominating. Two with slightly larger OHLs running across wood pole OHL along a foreground/ mid- similar alignment. ground view creating Medium- R1e 1 very obvious visual 0- 100 Low Low Moderate Moderate High clutter especially where it crosses road. This prominence reduces sensitivity to change of type proposed.

Appendix 4A: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2A) Page 6

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

A87 Loch Ainort to Trident OHL and 33kV Existing trident wood Sconser OHL run in parallel pole OHL to be replaced alongside road; very with slightly larger prominent especially at wood pole OHL along a road crossing point similar alignment. Medium- R1f 1 above Loch Ainort and 0-200 Low Low Moderate Moderate High here and elsewhere skylined. This prominence reduces sensitivity to change of type proposed.

A87 by Cable North-facing views Existing trident wood Crossing, Sconser across mouth of Loch pole OHL to be replaced Sligachan; foreground with slightly larger views of 2no. existing wood pole OHL along a R1g 1 33kv OHLs and warning Low similar alignment. 50-100 Low Low Minor Minor signs very prominent;reduces sensitivity to similar additional

A87 West of Sconser Across and along Loch Existing trident wood Sligachan; OHLs feature pole OHL to be replaced prominently in skyline with slightly larger to west facing traffic wood pole OHL along a R1h 1 especially and dominate High similar alignment. 50-300 Low Low Minor Minor foreground of loch to east-facing traffic especially where it crosses road.

Appendix 4A: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2A) Page 7

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

A87 Sligachan /Allt OHL runs parallel to Existing trident wood Dubh road but high up slope pole OHL to be replaced Low- R1i 1 to east with slightly larger 500 Low Low Minor Minor Medium wood pole OHL along a similar alignment.

A87 Glen Varragill OHL emerges from Existing trident wood conifer woodland to pole OHL to be replaced Low- Low- Minor- Minor- R1j 1 east then crosses A87 Medium with slightly larger 0-500 Medium Medium Moderate Moderate before running up side wood pole OHL along a of Glen opposite. similar alignment.

Raasay Ferry Passes close to existing Existing trident wood 33kv OHL/ Marine Cable pole OHL to be replaced R2 1 Med-Low 50 + Low Low Minor Minor installation on shore. with slightly larger wood pole OHL along a similar alignment.

B883 The Braes Relatively distant view Existing trident wood of existing 33kv OHL on pole OHL to be replaced opposite side of Loch at with slightly larger R3 1 Low 1000 Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Sconser. For majority of wood pole OHL along a the road, no view of similar alignment. existing OHL

Appendix 4A: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2A) Page 8

APPENDIX 4B: VISUAL EFFECTS TABLES – ROUTE OPTION 2B

APPENDIX 4B: ROUTE OPTION 2B; VISUAL EFFECTS TABLE N.B. OHL = OVERHEAD LINE

Important Notes; a) From Moll, Route Option 2B runs southwards by a marine cable to Luib; and between Luib and Strollamus Route Option 2B is the same as Route Option 2A. However, there is an alternative sub-route between Moll, Ard Dorch (AD) and Dunan and alternative effects arising as a result of this sub-route are referred to below using the Route Option 2B suffix (AD). See also Figure 4 b) The study area for the LVIA is based on an offset of 3km from the route centreline. After the initial route options appraisal and bearing in mind the nature of the development, it was decided that this would encompass the area within which any significant effects upon landscape character and visual amenity could occur. Due to the alignment not being known at this stage a Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) diagram has not been run in this instance. As a result this comparative route assessment is based on the assumption that the alignment will follow the centreline of the Corridor and assumed intervisibilty has been based upon site-based observation rather than desk-based mapping.

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

RECEPTORS IN BUILDING LOCATIONS

Strollamus N.E. facing across road Existing trident wood towards Scalpay. pole OHL to be replaced Small linear Hillside to rear is with slightly larger Medium- B1 settlement of 1 & 8 cluttered with existing wood pole OHL along a 100-150 Low Low Minor Minor Low 1.5 storey OHLs, reducing similar alignment. detached houses sensitivity. Would blend into and cottages existing OHL clutter. Rear views.

Dunan N.E. facing, towards Existing trident wood Scalpay. Steeply rising pole OHL to be replaced Small linear hillside and foreground with slightly larger B2 settlement of 1 & 4 trees largely screen Low wood pole OHL along a 100-150 Low Low Minor Minor 1.5 storey views of existing OHLs similar alignment. Rear/ detached houses higher up slope and to uphill views. and cottages and rear. outbuildings

Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 1

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

Ard Dorch Small linear N.E. facing, towards Limited or no view of settlement of 1.5 Scalpay. 33kV OHL on proposed Route 2A storey detached uphill side of road. OHL. 1000- B3a houses. All but 6 Low Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible 2000 one set down low in landscape, below road on loch side.

Ard Dorch N.E. facing, towards Limited or no view of Small linear Scalpay. 33kV OHL on proposed Route 2B (AD) settlement of 1.5 uphill side of road. OHL on account of storey detached location/ local houses. All but topography/ one set down low orientation. New OHL B3a in landscape, would terminate at 6 Low 50-100 Low Low Minor Minor (AD) below road on location where new loch side. apparatus would be installed for marine cable crossing of Loch Ainort; but this would be to the north and west of the settlement.

Existing trident wood Luib W-E facing across Strath pole OHL to be replaced Larger nucleated Mor and north facing, with slightly larger settlement of 1 & overlooking Loch wood pole OHL along a 1.5 storey Ainort. Two existing similar alignment. New detached houses OHLs run through OHL would terminate at B3b 18 Medium 50-200 Medium Medium Moderate Moderate and cottages valley. location where new clustered along apparatus would be sides of Strath installed for marine Mor as it emerges cable crossing of Loch at bay overlooking Ainort. Mostly front Loch Ainort. views. Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 2

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

Luib W-E facing across Strath Existing trident wood Larger nucleated Mor and north facing, pole OHL to be settlement of 1 & overlooking Loch removed. Mostly front 1.5 storey Ainort. Two existing views. B3b detached houses OHLs run through Medium Medium Moderate Moderate 18 Medium 50-200 (AD) and cottages valley. (+) (+) Beneficial Beneficial clustered along sides of Strath Mor as it emerges at bay overlooking Loch Ainort.

Sconser (south Views over Narrows of Existing trident wood end) Raasay. Existing OHLs pole OHL to be replaced Two 1.5 storey and Quarry feature in with slightly larger houses and Club views to rear and wood pole OHL along a 100-200 Low- Low- Minor- Minor- B4 3 Medium House (Skye G.C.) oblique views to east. similar alignment to Medium Medium Moderate Moderate rear but would cross road to south and likely to be slightly closer . Mostly rear views.

Quarry Elevated north-west Existing trident wood facing views up the pole OHL to be replaced Offices and Narrows of Raasay with slightly larger 50-100 Minor- Minor- B5 Outbuildings 1 Low wood pole OHL along a Medium Medium Moderate Moderate new alignment immediately to south and west. Mostly side/ oblique views.

Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 3

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

Front views across Luib Rear views of new Moll na Moll to Scalpay. Fish trident wood-pole OHL Minor- Minor- B6a Fish Farm Base 1 farm in foreground. Low rising uphill to rear. Medium Medium Moderate Moderate 300+

Moll Front views across Luib Rear views of new

2-storey House; 1- na Moll to Scalpay. Fish trident wood-pole OHL B6b 2 Medium Medium Medium Moderate Moderate storey croft farm in foreground. rising uphill to rear. 300+ Opposite to most important views.

Sconser (east end) Low-level front-facing On south side of road, northerly views across existing OHL removed Sconser Lodge (2 Narrows of Raasay. and replaced with storey hotel) Some trees to rear. slightly larger OHL Sconser House Views of existing OHLs alongside existing 33kv (2storey self - to rear, across road. OHL retained. New OHL B7 catering) 4 Limited side views of Medium would terminate at 500-100 Low Low Minor Minor One 1-storey apparatus relating to location where new house existing crossing from apparatus would be One 1.5 storey 1.5 storey house. installed for marine house cable crossing of Loch Situated below Sligachan. Limited side / and to the north rear views. of the road.

Sconser (central) Mostly north west Existing OHL upslope to -Fish Farm shore slightly elevated views rear removed. Minor- Minor- base over Loch Sligachan. B8 22 Medium 500-1000 Low (+) Low (+) Moderate Moderate -Ferry Terminal Existing OHL high up on Beneficial Beneficial -1 &1.5 storey slope to rear. detached houses and cottages

Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 4

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

Sconser (west Mostly north west Existing OHL upslope to end) slightly elevated views rear removed. over Loch Sligachan. Minor Minor B9 8 Low 300- 500 Low (+) Low (+) -1 &1.5 storey Existing OHL high up on Beneficial Beneficial detached houses, slope to rear. cottages and outbuildings

Sligachan Hotel Hotel in hollow in Existing OHL running and Camp Site landscape behind and across head of Loch to south of road. Camp Sligachan to front and Site on loch (north) side below removed. of road but also set low Moderate- Low- Medium- Moderate B10 2 in landscape. In both 500-750 High (+) Major Medium High (+) Beneficial cases, side-on views Beneficial obtained down glen featuring OHL as it crosses glen and rises up on both sides.

Sligachan Lodge Lodge has open, Existing OHL running and Bunkhouse elevated front north- across head of Loch facing views across Sligachan to front and 2 storey detached head of glen; with OHL below removed. View Low- Minor- house, self- crossing glen before Medium- slightly obscured by Medium Moderate B11 2 750 Medium Moderate catering. rising up other side. High foreground ridge. (+) Beneficial (+) Beneficial Views from bunk-house 1-storey detached are screened/ filtered timber building, by foreground lodge self-catering to and surrounding trees. rear of the above.

Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 5

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

Peinachorrain Elevated, open, south- Assumed new OHL Linear settlement facing views across Loch would run parallel to featuring 1, 1.5, Sligaghan to Sconser, existing 33kV OHL and 2-storey Moll and Raasay. 33kV through village and up houses/ crofts and OHL rises up through hill. Side-on views from Locally Locally Locally Locally Medium- B12a outbuildings 20 middle of settlement adjacent crofts. 10-100m+ Medium- Medium- Moderate- Moderate- High below road on before running upslope High High Major Major south side and parallel to road.

Peinachorrain Elevated, open, south- Linear settlement facing views across Loch featuring 1, 1.5, Sligaghan to Sconser, Assumed new OHL and 2-storey Moll and Raasay. 33kV would run parallel to Generally Generally houses/ crofts and OHL rises up through Medium- existing 33kV OHL Generally Generally B12b 20 10-100m+ Minor- Minor- outbuildings middle of settlement High through village and up Low Low Moderate Moderate below road on before running upslope hill. Side-on views from south side and parallel to road. adjacent crofts.

RECEPTORS AT OUTDOOR SITES

Elevated north-easterly Lay-By, A87 views down length of Existing trident wood above Loch Ainort Loch Ainort. Also large pole OHL removed; waterfall to south. existing 33kv OHL Low- Minor- Trident OHL and 33kv remains. Moderate O1 1 High 500 Low (+) Medium Moderate OHL run across Beneficial (+) Beneficial northerly field of view; partly skylined across mid-ground morainic ridge at head of Loch.

Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 6

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

Isle of Skye Towards Raasay. Trident OHL removed Golf Course Quarry and OHL feature and replaced with O2 1 in inland views. Medium slightly larger OHL 50+ Medium Medium Moderate Moderate featuring in inland views to south and east .

Sligachan Parking Slightly elevated views Trident OHL removed Area/ Picnic Area/ across the head of the from view as it crosses Vantage Point glen. OHL features in Glen although existing Moderate- Moderate- 03 1 mid-ground together High 33kV OHL remains. 500 Medium Medium Major Major with 33kv OHL as they Beneficial Beneficial cross glen and rise up other side.

Car Park/ Picnic South across Loch Assumed new OHL Area, Sligachan towards would run to run Peinachorrain Sconser.33kV OHL parallel to existing 33kV features prominently in OHL through village and Medium- Medium- Minor- Minor- 04 1 Medium 600 mid ground from the up hill. Side-on views Low Low Moderate Moderate point where it rises up from adjacent crofts. through the middle of the settlement upslope and parallel to road.

RECEPTORS ON ROUTEWAYS

A87 Strollamus N.E. facing across road Existing trident wood towards Scalpay. pole OHL to be replaced Hillside to rear is Medium- with slightly larger R1a 1 100-150 Low Low Minor Minor cluttered with existing Low wood pole OHL along a OHLs, reducing similar alignment. sensitivity. Would blend into existing OHL clutter. Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 7

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

A87 Dunan N.E. facing, towards Existing trident wood Scalpay. Steeply rising pole OHL to be replaced R1b 1 hillside and foreground Low with slightly larger 100-150 Low Low Minor Minor trees largely screen wood pole OHL along a views of existing OHLs similar alignment. Uphill higher up slope. views.

A87 Ard Dorch N.E. facing, towards Limited or no view of 1000- R1c 1 Scalpay. 33kV OHL on Low proposed Route 2A Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible uphill side of road. OHL. 2000

A87 Ard Dorch N.E. facing, towards Marine cable would Scalpay. 33kV OHL on continue under road uphill side of road. before emerging at a location above the road where it would rise R1c 1 Medium again onto OHL in Medium Medium Moderate Moderate (AD) combination with existing 33kv OHL. Also distant view of new OHL rising up Maol Ban on other side.

A87 Luib Village views and across Existing trident wood Loch Ainort. Two OHLs pole OHL to be replaced Minor- Minor- R1d 1 feature in view. Medium with slightly larger 50-200 Low Low Moderate Moderate wood pole OHL along a similar alignment.

Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 8

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

A87 Luib Village views and across Existing trident wood Moderate- Moderate- R1d 1 Loch Ainort. Two OHLs Medium pole OHL to be 50-200 High (+) High(+) Major Major (AD) feature in view. removed. Mostly front Beneficial Beneficial views.

A87 Loch Ainort Views to Cuillins, rising Existing trident wood above head of Loch pole OHL to be removed Ainort, dominating. Two leaving 33kV OHL. OHLs running across foreground/ mid- ground view creating Medium- Medium- Moderate- Moderate- Medium- R1e 1 very obvious visual 0- 100 High High Major Major High clutter especially where Beneficial Beneficial Beneficial Beneficial it crosses road. This prominence reduces sensitivity to change of type proposed.

A87 Loch Ainort Trident OHL and 33kV Existing trident wood to Sconser OHL run in parallel pole OHL to be removed alongside road; very leaving 33kV OHL. prominent especially at road crossing point Medium- Medium- Moderate- Moderate- Medium- R1f 1 above Loch Ainort and 0-200 High High Major Major High here and elsewhere (+) (+) Beneficial Beneficial skylined. This prominence reduces sensitivity to change of type proposed.

Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 9

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

A87 by Cable North-facing views On south side of road, Crossing, Sconser across mouth of Loch existing OHL removed Sligachan; foreground and replaced with views of 2no. existing slightly larger OHL 33kv OHLs and warning alongside existing 33kv signs very OHL retained. New OHL prominent;reduces would terminate at Minor- Minor- R1g 1 sensitivity to similar Low location where new 50-100 Medium Medium Moderate Moderate additional apparatus would be installed for marine cable crossing of Loch Sligachan. New OHL visible on opposite side of Loch, rising up slope. Limited side / rear views.

A87 West of Across and along Loch Existing trident wood Sconser Sligachan; OHLs feature pole OHL upslope to be prominently in skyline removed leaving 33kV to west facing traffic OHL. Especially Medium- Medium- Moderate- Moderate- especially and dominate beneficial at head of R1h 1 Medium 50-300 High High Major Major foreground of loch to Loch Sligachan where (+) (+) Beneficial Beneficial east-facing traffic OHL currently skylined especially where it as it crosses road and crosses road. then runs across the head of Loch Sligaghan.

A87 Sligachan OHL runs parallel to Existing trident wood /Allt Dubh road but high up slope pole OHL to be replaced Low- Minor Minor R1i 1 to east with slightly larger 500 Low Low Medium Beneficial Beneficial wood pole OHL along a similar alignment.

Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 10

Magnitude Effect

Approx.

Number of Sensitivity of Distance Name /Location / Receptor the Receptor Angle and Nature of to Closest Ref Nature of Main View Type/ Context Locations to Proposed Change Section

(approx.) OHL of OHL Operational

(m) Operational

Construction Construction

A87 Glen Varragill OHL emerges from Existing trident wood (Where 2B joins conifer woodland to pole OHL to be replaced 1A) east then crosses A87 with slightly larger Low- Low- Minor- Minor- R1j 1 before running up side Medium wood pole OHL along a 0-500 Medium Medium Moderate Moderate of Glen opposite. similar alignment. 33kv OHLs which radiate from this point remain.

Raasay Ferry Passes close to existing Existing OHL, visible to 33kv OHL/ Marine Cable south, removed and installation on shore. replaced with slightly larger OHL alongside existing 33kv OHL retained. New OHL on south bank would Minor- Minor- R2 1 Med-Low 50-100 Medium Medium terminate at location Moderate Moderate where new apparatus would be installed for marine cable crossing of Loch Sligachan near to existing. New OHL also visible on opposite side of Loch, rising up slope. Moorland views to New OHL likely to run B883 The Braes west; coastal views to in parallel to existing east.Views feature 33kV OHL up and over existing 33kV OHL rising the hillside; opposite to up hillslope from Loch most valued (coastal) Minor- Minor- R3 1 crossing. Low views; before 50m+ Medium Medium Moderate Moderate disappearing out of site uphill and becoming screened by foreground topography as it turns west at the Braes.

Appendix 4B: Visual Effects Tables (Route Option 2B) Page 11

FIGURES