Book Reviews

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Book Reviews BOOK REVIEWS The Many Legalities of Early Aneica. Edited by CHRISTOPHER L. TOMLINS and BRUCE H. MANN. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press for the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture, Williamsburg, Va., 2001. ix, 4 6 6p. Genealogical charts, tables, notes, index. Cloth, $59.95; paper, $22.50.) More than three decades ago, David H. Flaherty and the University of North Carolina Press published Essays in the History of EarlyAneri can Law (1969). His work was designed to demonstrate the current state of legal history, to identify areas worthy of investigation, and to encourage legal and nonlegal historians alike to accept the challenge of looking more closely at early American law and its institutions. Flaherty's effort stimulated a variety of works offering fresh looks at law, legal institutions, and the early bar. Nonetheless, fifteen years later, Stanley N. Katz ("The Problem of a Colonial Legal History," in Jack P. Greene and J. R. Pole, eds., ColonialBritish America: Essays in the New History of the Early Modern Era, 1984) complained that colonial legal history had failed to establish a critical interpretive presence for itself. Katz maintained that, as of 1984, no legal-historical perspective had surfaced to shape a general interpretation of the early American experience. Now, nearly two decades after Katz's lament, Christopher Tomlins, Bruce Mann, and the University of North Carolina Press have issued still another threefold challenge. They ask us to consider articles on the cutting edge of the "new legal history," to deliberate on the implications of these articles for our own work and that of others, and to produce even more provocative and stimulating studies linking the law and concepts of legality to social, political, and economic developments. Tomlins, Mann, and their contributors do not limit themselves to an examination of law and legal institutions. They have a broader vision, one that encompasses both concepts and practices of legality. That is, they are concerned with what constituted legality in the minds of early Americans and how individuals set about to work out their lifestyles in terms of those concepts. By definition, legal history in this broader sense guarantees that more than formal law and legal institutions will be embraced. It permits authors to probe informal institutions and practices that often shaped early lives every bit as fundamentally as the more recognized and acknowledged ones. Unfortunately, it also tempts them to lose sight of the law and legal institutions in their preoccupation with nonlegal institutions and forces. THE PENNSYLVANIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Vol. CXXVI, No. 3 (July 2002) BOOK REVIEWS Like most collections of essays, the result here is uneven both in style and worth. Each reader will find his or her own most compelling essay. And, without question, there is something for everyone, organized in four sections: "Atlantic Crossings" (four essays), "Intercultural Encounters" (three essays), "Rules of Law: Legal Relations as Social Relations" (four essays), and "Rules of Law: Legal Regimes and Their Social Effects" (five essays). The editors provide useful introductions to and surmaries of each section. Sixteen contributors join Tornlins and Mann in sharing their perspectives on "the many legalities of Early America." They include James Muldoon, Mary Sarah Bilder, David Caspar, David Konig, Katherine Hermes, James Brooks, Ann Marie Plane, Christine Daniels, Linda Sturtz, John Kolp, Terri Snyder, Holly Brewer, Cornelia Hughes Dayton, William Offhtt Jr., Richard Bushman, and A. G. Roeber. The brevity of this review precludes describing or assessing each article, but within the scope of the book one finds treatments of the full plurality and complexity of early American society. Topics include English and Spanish as well as Native American societies. They include men and women, free and unfree, adults and children, rich and poor. They also move beyond older legal history by confronting many of the most popular issues of current historiography-family, gender, race, ethnicity, patriarchy, and depen- dence. In their desire to exhibit the newest legal studies, to demonstrate the relevance of these essays to others working in the field of early history, and to stimulate scholarly thought on legal history in fresh terms, Tomlins, Mann, and their con- tributors succeed. They illustrate how the ideas of legality can be employed to explore the many ways in which the peoples of early America arranged their lives and determined their relationships with each other. The majority of essays stress accommodation and practicality in the formations of early "legalities." Still, if the new legal history is more all-encompassing, more sophisticated, and more nuanced-- and shown not to be the exclusive purview of lawyers and legal historians-it is also more peripheral than central to many of the authors. Several essays hardly engage the law or legal institutions at all. Doubtless the next generation's "new legoalhistory" will address this shortcoming. University of Northern Colorado G. S. RowE "The Tyranny of Printers":Newspaper Politics in the Early Republic. ByJEFFREY L. PASLEY. (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2001. xvii, 517p. Illustrations, appendixes, notes, bibliography, index. $37.50.) Jefferson had it wrong. We were not "all Republicans"; we were not "all Federalists." At best, Jefferson's olive branch was held out only to political elites 2002 BOOK REVIEWS 501 across a narrow span of shared gentility and aristocratic status. For the humble newspapermen of little status and fewer means who created the "newspaper-based party" (p. 17), orchestrated the "revolution of 1800," and stood at the vanguard of nineteenth-century democracy, the frontline battle between aristocratic Federalists and ordinary Republicans, and all that these divisions implied, was continuing and in earnest. In this comprehensive book, Jeffrey Pasley presents an intelligent, engaging "analytical narrative" (p. 22) of printer-editors, primarily focusing on Republican editors who, after all, were much more responsible than their Federalist counterparts for the advancement of partisan political newspapers. He does so generally by employing something numerically less rigorous but quafitatively more satisfying than Namierist collective biography to achieve his argument. (His personal website, www.pasleybrothers.com/newspol, provides easily accessible biographic vignettes of many of the printer-editors from 1776 to the mid-nineteenth century.) Pasley begins by tracing the role of printer-editors from their colonial origins, when they were only slowly drawn into political conflict, through the Revolution, when they "were more conduits for Revolutionary rhetoric than initiators of it" (p. 37). He arrives at the real start of his story in the 1790s when newspapermen launched the fight "to secure the right of American citizens to peacefully change their government and to implement the democratic promise of the early days of the American Revolution" (p. 46). Oddly, the banal John Fenno, who brought his editorship to the service of Alexander Hamilton's Federalists, seems slightly favored in the first episode of printer-editor partisan initiative in contrast to the more intelligent Philip Freneau, whom Pasley exposes as more the "hireling" in the politics ofjJefferson and Madison. Ambiguities of many kinds receded, Pasley rightly argues, when Benjamin Franklin Bache, with "great courage" (p. 79), advanced the partisan press in the Philadelphia Aurora, a paper that finally succeeded in addressing an "imagined partisan community of readers" (p. 96) willing to support the Republican cause. Pasley sentimentalizes Bache's democratic martyrdom, however, by creating a fictional aristocratic inheritance for Bache, claiming extravagantly that he even "lost caste by siding with the Republicans" (p. 89). Bache was raised for industry and artisanship, did not inherit any of his grandfathers property aside from his printing house and tools, and had no aristocratic cachet worth mentioning. He learned very early on that public ideology and private accomplishment interlocked where aristocracy had no place, in the ideals of independence, republicanism, and democracy. Change en masse began to take place when "the Sedition Act 'failed' by transforming a large number of printers into something more than simple pliers of the printer's trade" (p. 131). Featuring lesser-known printer-editors like Charles Holt, Pasley identifies "a new breed of printer, a group of artisan politicians who BOOK REVIEWS dispensed almost entirely with the standard commercial ideology of the printing trade" (p. 161), and pushed on through poverty and even physical attacks to create a cooperative network of newspapers largely free of top-down Republican control. Radical democratic partisanship found its early epitome in William Duane, Bache's uncompromising successor, who along with others attacked the genteel aristocratic forms and the lawyer-bound exclusivity of officeholding to which Federalist and Republican leaders alike dung. As partisan printing advanced, it remained in the hands of persons of lower to middling status. When the Federalists turned their hand to the same game, they proved either incompetent or vicious and vulgar, while Republican editors became the ones who generally suffered the withering fire of libel suits. Nor did eventual Republican victories lead to spoils until much later, as Duane's career
Recommended publications
  • The Petticoat Affair Manners, Mutiny and Sex in Andrew Jacksons White House 1St Edition Download Free
    THE PETTICOAT AFFAIR MANNERS, MUTINY AND SEX IN ANDREW JACKSONS WHITE HOUSE 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE John F Marszalek | 9780807126349 | | | | | The Petticoat Affair: Manners, Mutiny, and Sex in Andrew Jackson's White House / Edition 1 Trivia About The Petticoat Aff As it The Petticoat Affair Manners in his account, Jackson and his foes were not so much debating what was improper for women to do as arguing whether Mrs. At times Marszalek suggests that Margaret Eaton's The Petticoat Affair Manners somehow symbolized all the uncertainties and anxieties engendered by the era's great political, economic, and social upheaval. However, it turned out to be a dry listing of the events with little to no commentary on them. Though his copious bibliography lists many manuscript sources, these have not been fully utilized for what they reveal of female agency in the affair. More than years No identities are negotiated or contested, no "categories of analysis" invoked. John F. The book is a good read. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Whether it makes its case convincingly is another matter. The renowned "Eaton Affair" of Andrew Jackson's first presidential term is one of the most fascinating episodes in American political history. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Calhoun were destroyed, and Martin van Buren's political star was in the ascendency. One recent interpretation that takes this tack is Kirsten E. President Jackson's involvement in such a public and nonpolitical topic is one rarely seen since in history. Politically, the chief beneficiary of the affair was Secretary of State Martin Van Buren a widower with no wife to contend with who sided with Jackson, paid calls on Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview Due to a Quirk in Time, You Have Been Transported Back to the Year 1837 in Washington, D.C
    Overview Due to a quirk in time, you have been transported back to the year 1837 in Washington, D.C. Here, you find yourself involved in a historical event that never happened—the impeachment trial of Andrew Jackson. Jackson has been brought up on the following specific charges: Count 1: Committing crimes against Native Americans and creating a climate hostile to their existence. Count 2: Willful disregard of treaties and laws passed by the United States government. Count 3: Denial of the constitutional powers granted to the legislature, states, and Supreme Court. Roles in the Simulation Prosecution Defense Neutral Prosecuting Attorney (Opening/Closing) – Defense Attorney (Opening/Closing) – Congressman – Isabel Kartik Lucy Prosecuting Attorney – Defense Attorney – Congressman – Jay Ali Rohan Prosecuting Attorney – Defense Attorney – Congressman – Brit Jeremy Alec Prosecuting Attorney – Defense Attorney – Congressman – Priyaj Kayla Andrew Prosecuting Attorney – Defense Attorney – Congressman – Erin Felipe Lauren Cherokee Indian – Common Man- Reporter – Arjun Sneha Aishwarya John Marshall – Peggy Eaton – Reporter – Anahita Anwen Ariel Nicholas Biddle – Martin Van Buren – Reporter – Conner Skyeler Mia John C. Calhoun – Andrew Jackson – Artist – Will Tony Taylor Artist – Owen Andrew Jackson 1. Is the defendant in the impeachment trial 2. Will testify in his defense before Congress 3. Must be able to answer questions consistently with Jackson’s political views and be familiar with specific aspects of his life. Prosecution Team 1. The prosecution shall consist of five attorneys. 2. The prosecution will prepare to prove that Andrew Jackson is guilty under each of the three counts of the indictment listed above. 3. One attorney will prepare a two minute speech introducing the case against Jackson and a two minute closing.
    [Show full text]
  • From 'Factions' to Attack Ads – a History of American Politics
    From ‘Factions’ to Attack Ads – A History of American Politics Class 4 William A. Reader E-mail: [email protected] What We Will Cover Today • The Impact of Andrew Jackson • Political Conventions & the Nominating Process in Presidential Elections • The 1840 & 1844 Elections • The Mexican War and its consequences • Immigration and the Collapse of the Second Party System • The Coming of the Civil War Key Events of Jackson’s Presidency • The Battle of the Petticoats • Indian Removal • Veto of the Rechartering of the BUS • The Maysville Veto • Resistance to Nullification • Paying off the National Debt • Appointment of 6 Supreme Court justices, including Chief Justice Roger B. Taney • Institution of the Spoils System The Battle of the Petticoats - 1 • Margaret “Peggy” Eaton was the well- educated, vivacious daughter of the owner of the Franklin House, a Washington boarding house • In 1828, Peggy married Senator John Eaton, soon to be Jackson’s Secretary of War • This and Peggy Eaton’s past led Cabinet wives and Washington socialites to snub Mrs Eaton The Battle of the Petticoats - 2 • Jackson had lost his wife, Rachel, months before his inauguration – He blamed her death on the vicious attacks made upon her – He saw Peggy Eaton as an innocent victim of the same type of slanderous allegations • Since Martin Van Buren, a widower and Secretary of State, was kind to Mrs Eaton, he rose in Jackson’s favor The Battle of the Petticoats - 3 • Jackson, who felt that the Vice President had at least tacitly approved of Floride Calhoun’s attack on
    [Show full text]
  • “Petticoat Government”: the Eaton Affair and Jacksonian Political
    “Petticoat Government”: The Eaton Affair and Jacksonian Political Cultures Declan Mulders-Jones A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of B.A. (Hons) in History. University of Sydney October 2012 1 | P a g e Abstract Though typically trivialised by historians, the Eaton Affair preoccupied Andrew Jackson throughout his first presidency and lived on in nineteenth-century popular memory. This thesis sets aside dismissive, partisan and elitist scholarship, revisiting the contemporary evidence to demonstrate the Eaton Affair comprised two distinct scandals. In doing so, a heretofore unexamined dissonance between the place of women in mass and elite Jacksonian political cultures is also revealed. The clash of these cultures in the Eaton Affair would shape both for years to come: stigmatising “petticoat government” among the masses while severely curtailing its practice within the informal politicking of Washington. 2 | P a g e Acknowledgements: Approaching the end of this endeavour, it is only fitting to thank all those without whom this thesis could not have been written. First and foremost, my thanks go to my thesis supervisor Dr. Michael McDonnell who consistently provided indispensable guidance and feedback throughout the year. Also, to Dr. Frances Clarke and Dr. Nicolas Eckstein for their helpful advice along the way. The fascinating discussions with my Victorianisms and Violence in History seminars added immeasurably to my enjoyment of the Honours year, and sparked many ideas and possibilities. Finally, I would like to thank the friends and family members who served frequently as impromptu sounding boards, patiently listening while I attempted to shatter their preconceptions of events with which they were completely unfamiliar.
    [Show full text]
  • Peggy Eaton Affair
    THE PEGGY EATON AFFAIR Source: http://www.academicamerican.com/jeffersonjackson/topics/eaton.htm Margaret O'Neale Timberlake Eaton was not the focus of the first sexual scandal in American history, but she was at the center of one of the most interesting ones. Daughter of a popular Washington tavern keeper, Peggy was an attractive, vivacious young woman who attracted the attention of some of the most powerful men in America, including Senator John Eaton, a close friend of Andrew Jackson. As a young woman Peggy had married John Timberlake, a Navy purser who spent considerable time at sea. It was said that his untimely death in a foreign port was a suicide brought about by Peggy's infidelity, a charge never proven. Whether true or not, Peggy got married again, this time to John Eaton, who soon became a Secretary of War in Andrew Jackson's cabinet, whom she had met in her father's establishment. Soon after Jackson's inauguration it became apparent that the wives of the other members of Jackson's Cabinet did not approve of Mrs. Eaton's allegedly lurid past. She was snubbed at White House receptions, and Washington political society refused to accept or return social visits from Mrs. Eaton, and pronounced themselves scandalized that Mrs. Eaton was even invited to participate in polite Washington company. Jackson had known Peggy Eaton for some time and liked her. Perhaps more important, Jackson had lost his wife, Rachel, just months before his inauguration, and he blamed her death in part on what he saw as slanderous attacks on Jackson's own marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Seminole War, the Ad Hoc Origins of American Imperialism, and the Silence of Slavery
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) 1-1-2011 This Inglorious War: The econdS Seminole War, the Ad Hoc Origins of American Imperialism, and the Silence of Slavery Daniel Scallet Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Recommended Citation Scallet, Daniel, "This Inglorious War: The eS cond Seminole War, the Ad Hoc Origins of American Imperialism, and the Silence of Slavery" (2011). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 638. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/638 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University in St. Louis Department of History Dissertation Examination Committee: Iver Bernstein, Chair Elizabeth Borgwardt Randall Calvert Wayne Fields Peter Kastor David Konig "This Inglorious War": The Second Seminole War, the Ad Hoc Origins of American Imperialism, and the Silence of Slavery by Daniel Scallet A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2011 Saint Louis, Missouri Copyright by Daniel Scallet 2011 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Dwight D. Eisenhower Institute whose Clifford Roberts Fellowship Program provided funding for this project. I have also benefitted greatly from the Lynne Cooper Harvey Fellowship in American Culture Studies. Finally, I would like to thank the faculty at Washington University from whom I have learned so much as well as friends and family to whom I am eternally grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • John C. Calhoun
    John C. Calhoun March 18, 1782-March 31, 1850 “FREE TRADE; LOW DUTIES; NO DEBT; SEPARATION FROM BANKS; ECONOMY; RETRENCHMENT, AND STRICT ADHERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION,” read the 1843 campaign slogan of the Honorable John C. Calhoun during his last major bid for the presidency of the United States. These few phrases illustrate principles that Calhoun espoused during his career that continue to be relevant in contemporary America.[1] John Caldwell Calhoun’s national political career spanned approximately 40 years and included many high offices in the U.S government. Calhoun served in Congress, both in the House of Representatives and Senate, and as a cabinet member, as secretary of war and secretary of state. He was elected as vice president twice, serving two different administrations, and he was the first vice president to resign voluntarily from office. Politics was the essence of his life’s work; however, he established himself as a planter first with Bath Plantation and later Fort Hill. During the antebellum period, his national political career made the South Carolinian one of the most powerful and outspoken statesmen in our nation’s history. Since politics in Washington took precedence over supervising his plantation, he left it to relatives and overseers to manage the day-to-day farming operations of Fort Hill, often to his financial detriment. The Clemson University campus is built on Calhoun’s Fort Hill Plantation. Calhoun not only owned an antebellum southern agricultural plantation of over 1,000 acres of land, but also some 70-80 enslaved African-Americans.[2] Ancestry John Caldwell Calhoun was born March 18, 1782, the youngest of Patrick and Martha Calhoun’s five children.
    [Show full text]
  • John Macpherson Berrien Papers
    John Macpherson Berrien papers Descriptive Summary Repository: Georgia Historical Society Creator: Berrien, John Macpherson, 1781-1856. Creator: Berrien, Lawrence Cecil Creator: Burroughs, Rosa Berrien. Creator: Falligant family. Title: John Macpherson Berrien papers Dates: 1789-1942 Extent: 6.5 cubic feet (10 boxes, 8 volumes) Identification: MS 0067 Biographical/Historical Note John Macpherson Berrien (1781-1856) was a prominent lawyer and judge, plantation owner, and Attorney General of the United States under President Jackson. He moved with his parents to Savannah, Georgia, in 1783. He was admitted to the bar in 1799 after completing his degree at Princeton College. Elected solicitor of the eastern judicial circuit in 1809, he then became judge of the same circuit in 1810 and served until 1821. During this time, he served in the war of 1812 with the Chatham Light Dragoons and in the First Georgia Cavalry. He served in the Georgia state senate from 1822-1823 and in the U.S. Senate from 1824-1829, 1841-1852. From 1829-1831, he served as Attorney General under President Jackson. In addition, he served on the Board of Trustees of the University of Georgia, was president of the Georgia Historical Society, and was active in the Lyceum movement. He was married twice: first to Eliza Anciaux and later to Eliza C. Hunter. Between both marriages, he had fourteen children. He owned several residences in Georgia including Morton Hall Plantation. In addition to the papers of John Macpherson Berrien, this collection also includes the papers of Lawrence Cecil Berrien (1844-1902), the son of John Macpherson Berrien and Eliza C.
    [Show full text]
  • A LIFE in BRIEF Andrew Jackson, Seventh President of the United
    A LIFE IN BRIEF Andrew Jackson, seventh president of the United States, was the dominant actor in American politics between Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln. Born to obscure parents and orphaned in youth, he was the first "self-made man" and the first westerner to reach the White House. He became a democratic symbol and founder of the Democratic Party, the country's most venerable political organization. In his two-term presidency, he expanded executive powers and transformed the president's role from chief administrator to popular tribune. Jackson was born in 1767 in Waxhaw, South Carolina, to Scotch-Irish immigrants. He fought as a boy in the Revolutionary War, studied law, and in 1788 moved west to Nashville. In 1791 he began living with Rachel Donelson Robards, whose husband had abandoned her. They were formally married after her divorce in 1794. Charges of adultery arising from the episode dogged Jackson's later political career. After serving as Tennessee prosecutor, judge, congressman, and senator, he won fame as a Major General in the War of 1812 with smashing victories against the Creek Indians in 1814 and the British at New Orleans in January 1815. Jackson's triumph at New Orleans quickly became the stuff of legend and made him America's greatest military hero since George Washington. In 1818 he led an army in pursuit of Seminole Indians into Spanish Florida, touching off an international furor. After Spain ceded Florida, Jackson served briefly as territorial governor and was then senator from Tennessee in 1823-25. In a confused, four-candidate presidential race in 1824, Jackson led the popular and electoral vote but lost in the House of Representatives to John Quincy Adams through the influence of Speaker Henry Clay.
    [Show full text]
  • Assumptions of Authority: Social Washington's Evolution from Republican Court to Self-Rule, 1801-1831
    Wayne State University Wayne State University Dissertations 1-1-2014 Assumptions Of Authority: Social Washington's Evolution From Republican Court To Self-Rule, 1801-1831 Merry Ellen Scofield Wayne State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Scofield, Merry Ellen, "Assumptions Of Authority: Social Washington's Evolution From Republican Court To Self-Rule, 1801-1831" (2014). Wayne State University Dissertations. 1055. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/1055 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. ASSUMPTIONS OF AUTHORITY: SOCIAL WASHINGTON'S EVOLUTION FROM REPUBLICAN COURT TO SELF-RULE, 1801-1831 by MERRY ELLEN SCOFIELD DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2014 MAJOR: HISTORY Approved by: ______________________________________ Advisor Date ______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ © COPYRIGHT BY MERRY ELLEN SCOFIELD 2014 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Both Oakland University and Wayne State have afforded me the opportunity of working under scholars who have contributed either directly or indirectly to the completion of my dissertation and the degree attached to it. From Oakland, Carl Osthaus and Todd Estes encouraged and supported me and showed generous pride in my small accomplishments. Both continued their support after I left Oakland. There is a direct path between this dissertation and Todd Estes. I would not have published a portion of my master's thesis without his support, and being published changed the direction of my academic career and the way I saw myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Presentation
    The Age of Jackson Andrew Jackson - Who was he? orphaned at 14 ! became Tennessee’s 1st Congressional Representative at the age of 30 great war general: War of 1812 Battle of New Orleans took part in 5 duels (killed one man) had a bullet lodged in his heart for the rest of his life Election of 1824 Andrew Jackson (TN) John Quincy Adams (MA) William Crawford (GA) Henry Clay (KY) “Corrupt Bargain” only 25% of those who could vote actually voted ! Jackson got the most votes but not the number of electoral votes he needed ! Jackson led w/99 votes JQAdams=84 Crawford=41 Clay=37 ! 12th Amendment: if no candidate wins a majority of the votes, the House of Reps will choose from top three candidates Henry Clay = Speaker of the House Clay = didn’t like Jackson ! he supported Adams ! Kentucky’s electors were under strict instructions:vote for Jackson! Clay even convinced THEM! to vote for Adams(!) electoral votes: JQAdams=13 votes, Jackson=7, Crawford =4 The Corrupt Bargain: the newly-elected President JQAdams named Henry Clay the Secretary of State some said it was to pay him back for arranging the voting in the House Election of 1828 the JQAdams-Jackson Rematch there was a lot of mudslinging: making mean charges against an opponent Adams portrayed as dishonest ! Jackson portrayed as a barbarian 3 times as many people voted in 1828 than had in 1824: no longer had to own property to vote Jackson won in the South and the West as the “man of the people,” ! Jackson=178 electoral votes; JQAdams=only 83 Jackson As President his inaugural party was out
    [Show full text]
  • Vice Presidents of the United States 1789–1993
    VICE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES 1789±1993 [ i ] President Gerald R. Ford congratulating Vice President Nelson Rockefeller after his swearing in on December 19, 1974 [ ii ] VICE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES 1789±1993 Mark O. Hatfield United States Senator Donald A. Ritchie Jo Anne McCormick Quatannens Richard A. Baker William T. Hull U.S. Senate Historical Office Edited by Wendy Wolff U.S. Senate Historical Office U.S. Government Printing Office Washington [ iii ] 104th Congress, 2d Session S. Con. Res. 34 Senate Document 104±26 U.S. Government Printing Office Washington: 1997 Supt. of Docs. No.: 052±071±01227±3 Much of the material in this volume is protected by copyright. Photographs have been used with the consent of their respec- tive owners. No republication of copyrighted material may be made without permission in writing from the copyright holder. Cover illustration: Vice President Henry A. Wallace (center); Senator Harry S. Truman (right), who had recently won the Democratic nomination for vice president; and Senate Majority Leader Alben W. Barkley (left) in August 1944. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Vice Presidents of the United States, 1789±1993 / Mark O. Hatfield . [et al.] ; edited by Wendy Wolff. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Vice-PresidentsÐUnited StatesÐBiography. I. Hatfield, Mark O., 1922± . II. Wolff, Wendy. E176.49.V53 1997 973' .09'9 [B]ÐDC21 96±51492 CIP For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop; SSOP, Washington, DC 20402±9328 [ iv ] To Gerald W. Frank An exemplary citizen and leader in many civic causes.
    [Show full text]