DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact, Host Range and Chemical Ecology of the Lily Beetle, Lilioceris Lilii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repository DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES Impact, host range and chemical ecology of the lily beetle, Lilioceris lilii by Andrew Salisbury A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Imperial College London 2008 1 . Declaration DECLARATION I hereby declare that I have composed this thesis. The work of this thesis is a record of my own work; any collaborative work has been specifically acknowledged. Andrew Salisbury 2008 2 . Abstract ABSTRACT The lily beetle (Lilioceris lilii, Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) has a univoltine life cycle and a limited host range (Lilium, Fritillaria and Cardiocrinum). A survey of 237 professional growers indicates that L. lilii is a problem for many in the UK lily industry. A three-year field trial using six different Lilium indicated that the species Lilium regale is more resistant to L. lilii than the hybrids L. ‘Tiber’, L. ‘Brindisi’, L. ‘Conca d’Or’, L. ‘Eliganzer’ and L. ‘Golden Joy’. Phenology observations between the trial and an established population of the beetle have provided base-line data to which further observations can be compared. Future host susceptibility trials should use a standard lily such as L. regale against which others can be compared. Behavioural bioassays using a linear-track olfactometer demonstrated that the responses of L. lilii to hosts and conspecifics are at least in part odour-mediated. Significantly more diapaused females moved into airstreams containing the odour of intact hosts over clean air, to that of hosts and beetles combined over that of undamaged or manually-damaged plants, and into airstreams from intact plants over larval-infested plants. Pre-diapause males moved into the airstreams of intact hosts in preference to L. lilii-infested plants. Using air entrainment, gas chromatography (GC) and coupled gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), headspace volatiles from beetle- infested host plants have been collected and identified. From these compounds, methyl salicylate, nonanal, cis-jasmone, linalool, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one and β-pinene elicited electrophysiological responses from L. lilii using electroantennography (EAG) and coupled GC-EAG. Bioassays indicate that diapaused female beetles move into the airstream of clean air in preference to cis-jasmone. Investigations from all areas of the project have progressed our understanding of the ecology of L. lilii but further studies are needed before more effective control strategies can be developed. 3 . Contents CONTENTS Page DECLARATION 2 ABSTRACT 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 LIST OF FIGURES 8 LIST OF TABLES 12 ABBREVIATIONS 14 GLOSSARY 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 16 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION: THE BIOLOGY OF THE LILY 17 BEETLE, Lilioceris lilii (Scopoli) (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) 1.1. DESCRIPTION 17 1.2. LIFE CYCLE 19 1.3. HOST RANGE 20 1.4. WORLDWIDE DISTRIBUTION 26 1.5. DISTRIBUTION IN THE UK 27 1.6. GENERALIST PREDATORS 27 1.7. PARASITOIDS 28 1.8. DEFENCE 31 1.9. PEST STATUS 32 1.10. MANAGEMENT IN THE UK 33 1.11. BIOLOGICAL CONTROL 33 1.12. CONCLUSIONS 35 1.13. PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND AIM 35 CHAPTER 2. THE LILY BEETLE- A RISK TO UK HORTICULTURE? 36 2.1. INTRODUCTION 36 2.2. RISK ASSESSMENT SURVEY PART 1: EFFECT OF THE LILY 37 BEETLE IN AMATEUR GARDENS 2.2.1. Introduction and methods 37 2.2.2. Results and discussion 37 2.3. RISK ASSESSMENT SURVEY PART 2: PROVIDERS OF LILIES 38 2.3.1. Introduction and methods 38 2.3.2. Results and discussion 38 4 . Contents 2.4. RISK ASSESSMENT SURVEY PART 3: PROFESSIONAL USERS 46 OF LILIES 2.4.1. Introduction and methods 46 2.4.2. Results and Discussion 46 2.5. CONCLUSIONS 51 2.6. RECOMMENDATIONS 51 CHAPTER 3. DO LILIES VARY IN SUSCEPTIBILITY TO THE LILY 53 BEETLE? 3.1. INTRODUCTION 53 3.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 54 3.2.1. Field trial 54 3.2.2. Observations in the Wild Garden 57 3.2.3. Data analysis 57 3.3. RESULTS 59 3.3.1. Do different lilies vary in susceptibility? 59 3.3.2. Phenology and other observations 61 3.4. DISCUSSION 67 3.4.1. Do different lilies vary in susceptibility? 67 3.4.2. Phenology and other observations 70 CHAPTER 4. ODOUR-MEDIATED BEHAVIOUR OF THE LILY 72 BEETLE (Lilioceris lilii) 4.1. INTRODUCTION 72 4.1.1. Chemical-mediated behaviour of the Chrysomelidae 72 4.1.1.1. Host location and acceptance 73 4.1.1.2. Conspecific location 75 4.1.1.3. Application of Chrysomelid semiochemistry 77 4.1.1.4 Conclusions 79 4.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 80 4.2.1. Plant material 80 4.2.2. Insects 80 4.2.3. Linear-track olfactometer tests 81 4.3. RESULTS 85 4.3.1. Insects 85 4.3.2. Linear-track olfactometer tests 86 5 . Contents 4.4. DISCUSSION 97 4.4.1. Insects 97 4.4.2. Odour-mediated behaviour 97 CHAPTER 5. RESPONSE OF LILIOCERIS LILII TO VOLATILES 102 FROM A HOST PLANT 5.1. INTRODUCTION 102 5.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 103 5.2.1. Collection of plant volatiles (volatile entrainment) 103 5.2.2. Collection of volatiles from adult beetles (Vacuum 105 distillation) 5.2.3. Chromatography and electrophysiology (identification of 106 potentially behaviourally-active volatiles) 5.2.4. Behavioural bioassays 111 5.3. RESULTS 111 5.3.1. Identification of potentially behaviourally-active volatiles 111 from beetle damaged plants. 5.3.2. Behavioural bioassays (confirmation of potential 118 behavioural activity of identified compounds) 5.3.3. Analysis of vacuum distillate from adult beetles 120 5.4. DISCUSSION 5.4.1. Identification of potentially biologically-active compounds 120 from headspace volatiles collected from an infested Lilium regale plant 5.4.2. Assessment of behavioural activity (behavioural bioassay) 122 5.4.3. Analysis of vacuum distillate from adult beetles 123 5.4.4. Conclusions 123 CHAPTER 6. GENERAL DISCUSSION 125 6.1. INTRODUCTION 125 6.2. OBJECTIVE 1: TO INVESTIGATE THE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY 125 OF L. LILII 6.3. OBJECTIVE 2: TO INVESTIGATE THE CHEMICAL ECOLOGY OF 126 THE BEETLE 6.4. OBJECTIVE 3: IN CONJUNCTION WITH SURVEY-BASED DATA, 129 TO ASSESS THE RISK TO THE LILY INDUSTRY RELATING TO POT PLANTS, CUT FLOWERS AND OUTDOOR BULB PRODUCTION 6 . Contents 6.5. AIM: BASED ON OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE BIOLOGY, 130 ECOLOGY AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY DEVELOP INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR CONTROL OF L. LILII . 6.6. CONCLUSION 130 REFERENCES 132 APPENDIX 151 A.1. Lily beetle fact sheet, sent with surveys 151 A.2. Survey form sent to lily providers 152 A.3. Survey form sent to gardens open to the public 155 7 . List of Figures LIST OF FIGURES Page 1.1. Lilioceris lilii adult. 17 1.2. Lilioceris lilii eggs on a Lilium leaf. 18 1.3. Lilioceris lilii larvae on Lilium regale. 19 1.4. Worldwide distribution of Lilioceris lilii. 25 1.5. Post 1939 10 km dot distribution map of Lilioceris lilii from records 28 held by the RHS (at October 2007). Produced using DMAP©. 1.6. Lemophagus errabundus female. 29 1.7. Larva of Lemophagus errabundus. 29 1.8. Tetrastichus setifer female. 30 1.9. Tetrastichus setifer larva. 30 1.10. Mesochorus lilioceriphilus female. 30 1.11. Distribution of Lilioceris lilii parasitoids in England (at October 2007). 30 Produced using DMAP©. 1.12. Lilioceris lilii enquiries as a proportion of all pest enquiries received by 33 the RHS (1967 to 2006). 2.1. Replies from 148 enquirers who were asked “If you continue to have 37 a lily beetle problem would you stop growing lilies in the future?“ 2.2. Perceived impact of lily beetle on lily sales. 40 2.3. Where lily providers source new stock. 41 2.4. Providers’ growing regimes for lilies in the UK. 41 2.5. Provider size by number of plants sold. 43 2.6. Sales trend over the past five years, by number of responses. 43 2.7. Lily provider pest problems, by proportion of lilies sold. 44 2.8. Pesticides used by proportion of plants sold (of 6 700 225). 45 2.9. Number of lilies grown by gardens in the survey. 47 2.10. Likely effect on lily growing if lily beetle becomes established in 48 gardens open to the public. 2.11. Where gardens source lilies and the effect lily beetle may have on 49 plant purchases. 2.12. Pests experienced on lilies in gardens open to the public. 50 3.1. The 6 x 6 Latin square design, used in the field trial. 55 3.2. Plot 1 of the field trial (July 2005). 56 8 . List of Figures 3.3. Plot 2 and spare lilies (under fine netting) of the field trial (July 2005). 56 3.4. Lilioceris lilii damage index for the field trial. 59 3.5. Mean number of adult Lilioceris lilii per scoring visit in the field trial. 60 3.6. Mean number of Lilioceris lilii larvae per scoring visit in the field trial. 61 3.7. The mean Lilioceris lilii damage score on Lilium in the Wild Garden 62 and Field Trial at Wisley, over three years. 3.8. The occurrence (mean number) of adult Lilioceris lilii observed in the 63 Wild Garden and Field Trial, Wisley, over three years. 3.9. The occurrence (mean number) of Lilioceris lilii eggs observed in the 64 Wild Garden and Field Trial at Wisley, over three years. 3.10. Frequency of Lilioceris lilii egg batch size observed at Wisley. 65 3.11. The occurrence (mean number) of Lilioceris lilii larvae observed in the 66 Wild Garden and Field Trial at Wisley, over three years.
Recommended publications
  • Summary of Offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019

    Summary of Offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019

    Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 3841 Number of items in BX 301 thru BX 463 1815 Number of unique text strings used as taxa 990 Taxa offered as bulbs 1056 Taxa offered as seeds 308 Number of genera This does not include the SXs. Top 20 Most Oft Listed: BULBS Times listed SEEDS Times listed Oxalis obtusa 53 Zephyranthes primulina 20 Oxalis flava 36 Rhodophiala bifida 14 Oxalis hirta 25 Habranthus tubispathus 13 Oxalis bowiei 22 Moraea villosa 13 Ferraria crispa 20 Veltheimia bracteata 13 Oxalis sp. 20 Clivia miniata 12 Oxalis purpurea 18 Zephyranthes drummondii 12 Lachenalia mutabilis 17 Zephyranthes reginae 11 Moraea sp. 17 Amaryllis belladonna 10 Amaryllis belladonna 14 Calochortus venustus 10 Oxalis luteola 14 Zephyranthes fosteri 10 Albuca sp. 13 Calochortus luteus 9 Moraea villosa 13 Crinum bulbispermum 9 Oxalis caprina 13 Habranthus robustus 9 Oxalis imbricata 12 Haemanthus albiflos 9 Oxalis namaquana 12 Nerine bowdenii 9 Oxalis engleriana 11 Cyclamen graecum 8 Oxalis melanosticta 'Ken Aslet'11 Fritillaria affinis 8 Moraea ciliata 10 Habranthus brachyandrus 8 Oxalis commutata 10 Zephyranthes 'Pink Beauty' 8 Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 Most taxa specify to species level. 34 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for bulbs 23 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for seeds 141 taxa were listed with quoted 'Variety' Top 20 Most often listed Genera BULBS SEEDS Genus N items BXs Genus N items BXs Oxalis 450 64 Zephyranthes 202 35 Lachenalia 125 47 Calochortus 94 15 Moraea 99 31 Moraea
  • Bulb Dormancy in Vitro—Fritillaria Meleagris: Initiation, Release and Physiological Parameters

    Bulb Dormancy in Vitro—Fritillaria Meleagris: Initiation, Release and Physiological Parameters

    plants Review Bulb Dormancy In Vitro—Fritillaria meleagris: Initiation, Release and Physiological Parameters Marija Markovi´c*, Milana Trifunovi´cMomˇcilov , Branka Uzelac , Sladana¯ Jevremovi´c and Angelina Suboti´c Department of Plant Physiology, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stankovi´c“—NationalInstitute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] (M.T.M.); [email protected] (B.U.); [email protected] (S.J.); [email protected] (A.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In ornamental geophytes, conventional vegetative propagation is not economically feasible due to very slow development and ineffective methods. It can take several years until a new plant is formed and commercial profitability is achieved. Therefore, micropropagation techniques have been developed to increase the multiplication rate and thus shorten the multiplication and regeneration period. The majority of these techniques rely on the formation of new bulbs and their sprouting. Dormancy is one of the main limiting factors to speed up multiplication in vitro. Bulbous species have a period of bulb dormancy which enables them to survive unfavorable natural conditions. Bulbs grown in vitro also exhibit dormancy, which has to be overcome in order to allow sprouting of bulbs in the next vegetation period. During the period of dormancy, numerous physiological processes occur, many of which have not been elucidated yet. Understanding the process of dormancy will allow us to speed up and improve breeding of geophytes and thereby achieve economic profitability, which is very important for horticulture. This review focuses on recent findings in the area of Citation: Markovi´c,M.; Momˇcilov, bulb dormancy initiation and release in fritillaries, with particular emphasis on the effect of plant M.T.; Uzelac, B.; Jevremovi´c,S.; growth regulators and low-temperature pretreatment on dormancy release in relation to induction of Suboti´c,A.
  • AGS Seed List No 69 2020

    AGS Seed List No 69 2020

    Seed list No 69 2020-21 Garden Collected Seed 1001 Abelia floribunda 1057 Agrostemma githago 1002 Abies koreana 1058 Albuca canadensis (L.
  • Analysis of the Giant Genomes of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) Indicates That a Lack of DNA Removal Characterizes Extreme Expansions in Genome Size

    Analysis of the Giant Genomes of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) Indicates That a Lack of DNA Removal Characterizes Extreme Expansions in Genome Size

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Queen Mary Research Online Analysis of the giant genomes of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) indicates that a lack of DNA removal characterizes extreme expansions in genome size. Kelly, LJ; Renny-Byfield, S; Pellicer, J; Macas, J; Novák, P; Neumann, P; Lysak, MA; Day, PD; Berger, M; Fay, MF; Nichols, RA; Leitch, AR; Leitch, IJ © 2015 The Authors. CC-BY For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/8496 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] Research Analysis of the giant genomes of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) indicates that a lack of DNA removal characterizes extreme expansions in genome size Laura J. Kelly1,2, Simon Renny-Byfield1,3, Jaume Pellicer2,Jirı Macas4, Petr Novak4, Pavel Neumann4, Martin A. Lysak5, Peter D. Day1,2, Madeleine Berger2,6,7, Michael F. Fay2, Richard A. Nichols1, Andrew R. Leitch1 and Ilia J. Leitch2 1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK; 2Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, TW9 3DS, UK; 3 4 Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, CZ-37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic; 5Plant Cytogenomics Research Group, CEITEC – Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500, Brno, Czech Republic; 6School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; 7Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK Summary Authors for correspondence: Plants exhibit an extraordinary range of genome sizes, varying by > 2000-fold between the Laura J.
  • Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)

    Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)

    Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015) By Richard Henderson Research Ecologist, WI DNR Bureau of Science Services Summary This is a preliminary list of insects that are either well known, or likely, to be closely associated with Wisconsin’s original native prairie. These species are mostly dependent upon remnants of original prairie, or plantings/restorations of prairie where their hosts have been re-established (see discussion below), and thus are rarely found outside of these settings. The list also includes some species tied to native ecosystems that grade into prairie, such as savannas, sand barrens, fens, sedge meadow, and shallow marsh. The list is annotated with known host(s) of each insect, and the likelihood of its presence in the state (see key at end of list for specifics). This working list is a byproduct of a prairie invertebrate study I coordinated from1995-2005 that covered 6 Midwestern states and included 14 cooperators. The project surveyed insects on prairie remnants and investigated the effects of fire on those insects. It was funded in part by a series of grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. So far, the list has 475 species. However, this is a partial list at best, representing approximately only ¼ of the prairie-specialist insects likely present in the region (see discussion below). Significant input to this list is needed, as there are major taxa groups missing or greatly under represented. Such absence is not necessarily due to few or no prairie-specialists in those groups, but due more to lack of knowledge about life histories (at least published knowledge), unsettled taxonomy, and lack of taxonomic specialists currently working in those groups.
  • Abatement Patterns of Predation Risk in an Insect Herbivore Jörg G

    Abatement Patterns of Predation Risk in an Insect Herbivore Jörg G

    Predator hunting mode and host plant quality shape attack- abatement patterns of predation risk in an insect herbivore Jörg G. Stephan,1,† Matthew Low,1 Johan A. Stenberg,2 and Christer Björkman1 1Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7044, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden 2Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 102, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden Citation: Stephan, J. G., M. Low, J. A. Stenberg, and C. Björkman. 2016. Predator hunting mode and host plant quality shape attack- abatement patterns of predation risk in an insect herbivore. Ecosphere 7(11):e01541. 10.1002/ecs2.1541 Abstract. Group formation reduces individual predation risk when the proportion of prey taken per predator encounter declines faster than the increase in group encounter rate (attack-abatement). Despite attack- abatement being an important component of group formation ecology, several key aspects have not been empirically studied, that is, interactions with the hunting mode of the predator and how these relationships are modified by local habitat quality. In 79 cage trials, we examined individual egg predation risk in different- sized egg clutches from the blue willow beetle Phratora vulgatissima for two predators with different hunting modes (consumption of full group [Orthotylus marginalis] vs. part group [Anthocoris nemorum]). Because these predators also take nutrients from plant sap, we could examine how the quality of alternative food sources (high- vs. low- quality host plant sap) influenced attack-abatement patterns in the presence of different hunting strategies. For the O. marginalis predator, individual egg predation risk was largely independent of group size.
  • Subfamily Criocerinae

    Subfamily Criocerinae

    Subfamily Criocerinae Checklist From the Checklist of Beetles of the British Isles, 2008 edition, edited by A. G. Duff (available from www.coleopterist.org.uk/checklist.htm). Currently accepted names are written in bold italics, synonyms used by Joy in italics. CRIOCERIS Geoffroy, 1762 asparagi (Linnaeus, 1758) LEMA Fabricius, 1798 cyanella (Linnaeus, 1758) (= puncticollis Curtis, 1830) LILIOCERIS Reitter, 1912 lilii (Scopoli, 1763) OULEMA des Gozis, 1886 erichsoni (Suffrian, 1841) melanopus (Linnaeus, 1758) (= melanopa). obscura (Stephens, 1831) (= lichenis) rufocyanea (Suffrian, 1847) (= melanopa; rufocyanea and melanopus separated later) septentrionis (Weise, 1880) Image Credits The illustrations in this key are reproduced from the Iconographia Coleopterorum Poloniae, with permission kindly granted by Lech Borowiec. © Mike Hackston (2009) Subfamily Criocerinae Key to British genera and species adapted from Joy (1932) by Mike Hackston 1 Elytra green or blue with the sides reddish and with three yellow marks on each elytron which sometimes run together. ........................................ .......... Crioceris asparagi England northwards to Derbyshire on Asparagus officinalis. Length 5-6.5 mm. Elytra more or less uniformly reddish. ....................................... .......... Lilioceris lilii First recorded in 1940 this species has spread rapidly through England and south Wales, reaching central Scotland and Northern Ireland by 2002. It is a pest of Lilium species Elytra uniformly green or blue to bluish black. .....................................................2
  • (A) Journals with the Largest Number of Papers Reporting Estimates Of

    (A) Journals with the Largest Number of Papers Reporting Estimates Of

    Supplementary Materials Figure S1. (a) Journals with the largest number of papers reporting estimates of genetic diversity derived from cpDNA markers; (b) Variation in the diversity (Shannon-Wiener index) of the journals publishing studies on cpDNA markers over time. Figure S2. (a) The number of publications containing estimates of genetic diversity obtained using cpDNA markers, in relation to the nationality of the corresponding author; (b) The number of publications on genetic diversity based on cpDNA markers, according to the geographic region focused on by the study. Figure S3. Classification of the angiosperm species investigated in the papers that analyzed genetic diversity using cpDNA markers: (a) Life mode; (b) Habitat specialization; (c) Geographic distribution; (d) Reproductive cycle; (e) Type of flower, and (f) Type of pollinator. Table S1. Plant species identified in the publications containing estimates of genetic diversity obtained from the use of cpDNA sequences as molecular markers. Group Family Species Algae Gigartinaceae Mazzaella laminarioides Angiospermae Typhaceae Typha laxmannii Angiospermae Typhaceae Typha orientalis Angiospermae Typhaceae Typha angustifolia Angiospermae Typhaceae Typha latifolia Angiospermae Araliaceae Eleutherococcus sessiliflowerus Angiospermae Polygonaceae Atraphaxis bracteata Angiospermae Plumbaginaceae Armeria pungens Angiospermae Aristolochiaceae Aristolochia kaempferi Angiospermae Polygonaceae Atraphaxis compacta Angiospermae Apocynaceae Lagochilus macrodontus Angiospermae Polygonaceae Atraphaxis
  • H. Kiyosumiensis F

    H. Kiyosumiensis F

    Hosta Species Update●The Hosta Library © W. George Schmid 2006 H. kiyosumiensis F. Maekawa 1935 Jornal of Japanese Botany 11:689; ic. f. 15 1935 キヨスミギボウシ = Kyosumi Giboshi H. kiyosumiensis var. petrophila F. Maekawa 1938 Divisiones et Plantae Novae Generis Hostae (2). J. Japanese Botany, 14:1:45–49. イワマ ギボウシ = Iwama Giboshi History and Nomenclature: In Japan this species is called Kyiosumi Giboshi, the “Kiyosumi (Mountain) Hosta.” The species epithet stems from the Latinized name of Kiyosumiyama (清澄山), a small mountain (380 m/about 1250 feet AMSL with a great view of Tokyo Bay) located on Boso Peninsula (Bōsō-hantō; 房総半島), which is located in south Chiba Prefecture (Chiba-ken; 千葉県) forming the eastern edge of Tokyo Bay. Maekawa established H. kiyosumiensis in 1935 and published further on the species in 1938, when he also described a new variety of the species as H. (kiyosumiensis var.) petrophila. This varietal epithet is derived from the Latin “liking (or) growing on rocks.” The Japanese name Iwama Giboshi (イワマ ギボウシ) has the same meaning. The latter is differentiated by minor morphological details caused by its different, rocky habitat in Yamashiro province (山城国; Yamashiro-no kuni), H. kiyosumiensis Maekawa 1935 (in situ) Otogawa (男川) River; Okazaki-shi (岡崎市; formerly Nukata-cho) Aichi Prefecture (愛知県; Aichi-ken) 1 an old province of Japan (today the southern part of Kyoto Prefecture). Maekawa (1938) gave a much abbreviated Latin description and the variety is here considered synonymous with the species. In fact, Maekawa (1969) no longer supported the varietal rank. N. Fujita (1976) confirmed H. kiyosumiensis as a species and added two morphs previously described by Maekawa (1940), i.e., H.
  • Four Year Study Involving Wildlife Monitoring of Commercial SRC Plantations Planted on Arable Land and Arable Control Plots

    Four Year Study Involving Wildlife Monitoring of Commercial SRC Plantations Planted on Arable Land and Arable Control Plots

    Four year study involving wildlife monitoring of commercial SRC plantations planted on arable land and arable control plots DTI TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMME: NEW AND RENEWABLE ENERGY CONTRACT NUMBER B/U1/00627/00/00 URN NUMBER 04/961 PROJECT REPORT The DTI drives our ambition of ’prosperity for all' by working to create the best environment for business success in the UK. We help people and companies become more productive by promoting enterprise, innovation and creativity. We champion UK business at home and abroad. We invest heavily in world-class science and technology. We protect the rights of working people and consumers. And we stand up for fair and open markets in the UK, Europe and the world. ii ARBRE MONITORING - ECOLOGY OF SHORT ROTATION COPPICE B/U1/00627/REP DTI/PUB URN 04/961 Contractor The Game Conservancy Trust (GCT) Sub-Contractor The Central Science Laboratory (CSL) Prepared by M.D.Cunningham (GCT) J.D. Bishop (CSL) H.V.McKay (CSL) R.B.Sage (GCT) The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the DTI Technology Programme: New and Renewable Energy. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of the DTI. First published 2004 © Crown Copyright 2004 ii i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This project, funded by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) through Future Energy Solutions, was conducted over a four-year period starting in 2000. The project involved wildlife monitoring within Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) plots managed commercially for the project ARBRE (Arable Biomass Renewable Energy) throughout Yorkshire.
  • The Distribution of Leaf Beetles on Multiple Spatial

    The Distribution of Leaf Beetles on Multiple Spatial

    THE DISTRIBUTION OF LEAF BEETLES ON MULTIPLE SPATIAL SCALES: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DES NATURWISSENSCHAFTLICHEN DOKTORGRADES DER BAYERISCHEN JULIUS-MAXIMILIANS-UNIVERSITÄT WÜRZBURG VORGELEGT VON ANNETTE HEISSWOLF AUS MARKTHEIDENFELD WÜRZBURG 2006 Eingereicht am: 12. Mai 2006 Mitglieder der Prüfungskommission: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Rössler Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Hans Joachim Poethke Zweitgutachterin: PD Dr. Caroline Müller Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: 02. August 2006 Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am: .......................... ‘Freude am Schauen und Begreifen ist die schönste Gabe der Natur’ Albert Einstein Table of Contents Table of Contents 5 1 General Introduction 9 1.1 Introduction ............................... 11 1.1.1 Where are herbivores found in the landscape? ......... 13 1.1.2 Which microhabitats do herbivores choose within a habitat? . 16 1.1.3 On which plants do herbivores oviposit? ............ 19 1.1.4 Where on the plant does oviposition occur? .......... 21 1.2 Scope and outline of the thesis ..................... 21 2 Study systems and study area 23 2.1 The specialist system .......................... 25 2.2 The generalist system .......................... 28 2.3 Study area – the nature reserve ‘Hohe Wann’ ............. 30 3 Habitat size, isolation, and quality determine the distribution of a monophagous leaf beetle and its egg parasitoid in a fragmented land- scape 33 3.1 Introduction ............................... 35 3.2 Material and Methods .......................... 36 3.2.1 Study sites ........................... 36 3.2.2 Habitat quality ......................... 36 3.2.3 Patch size ............................ 37 3.2.4 Patch isolation ......................... 38 3.2.5 Statistics ............................ 38 3.3 Results .................................. 39 3.3.1 Incidence of C. canaliculata .................. 39 3.3.2 Population density of C. canaliculata ............. 40 3.3.3 Parasitism by F.
  • The Cereal Leaf Beetle, Oulema Melanopus

    The Cereal Leaf Beetle, Oulema Melanopus

    January 2014 Agdex 622-29 Cereal Leaf Beetle he cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus include edges of crops and woodlots, fence rows, sparse T L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), is an invasive insect woods and dense woods. After emerging, the adults from Europe that feeds on cereal crops, including wheat, disperse to host crops, feed, mate and lay eggs. Peak egg barley and oats. It was first discovered in North America laying occurs in May. in 1962 in the state of Michigan. The cereal leaf beetle now is found in most cereal production areas of the Eggs United States. Eggs are laid on the upper surfaces of leaves along the margins or close to the leaf mid-rib. Oats and barley are preferred hosts for egg laying, but spring-planted wheat, Background winter wheat and other grasses are also hosts. Cereal leaf beetle was first observed in Alberta in 2005, Eggs are laid singly or in multiple clusters Saskatchewan in 2008 and in Manitoba in of two or three, touching end to end. 2009. Computer modeling based on Newly laid eggs are bright yellow, but current environmental conditions The cereal leaf darken to orange-brown and then black suggests that the cereal leaf beetle could before hatching. Eggs are cylindrical and invade all cereal growing areas of beetle feeds on measure 0.4 by 0.9 mm. Canada. wheat, barley The eggs hatch in about 4 to 6 days, and The beetle is widespread throughout the the most favourable developmental southern part of Alberta, from Pincher and oats. temperature is about 21° C.