A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL of PANIC Advancing The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL of PANIC Advancing The Running head: A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF PANIC Advancing the Network Theory of Mental Disorders: A Computational Model of Panic Disorder Donald J. Robinaugh1, Jonas M. B. Haslbeck2, Lourens J. Waldorp2, Jolanda J. Kossakowski,2 Eiko I. Fried3, Alexander J. Millner4, Richard J. McNally4, Egbert H. van Nes5, Marten Scheffer5, Kenneth S. Kendler6, Denny Borsboom2 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School 2University of Amsterdam 3Leiden University 4Harvard University 5Wageningen University 6Virginia Commonwealth University May 22nd, 2019 Author Note Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Donald J. Robinaugh, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin, MA 02114. E-mail: [email protected]. This manuscript was supported by a National Institute of Mental Health Career Development Award (1K23MH113805-01A1) awarded to D. Robinaugh and an ERC Consolidator Grant no. 647209 awarded to D. Borsboom. A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF PANIC 2 Abstract The network theory of psychopathology posits that mental disorders are complex systems of mutually reinforcing symptoms. This overarching framework has proven highly generative but does not specify precisely how any specific mental disorder operates as such a system. We address this gap in the literature by developing a network theory of Panic Disorder and formalizing that theory as a computational model. We first review prior psychological theory and research on Panic Disorder in order to identify its core components as well as the plausible causal relations among those components. We then construct and evaluate a computational model of Panic Disorder as a non-linear dynamical system. We show that this model can explain a great deal, including individual differences in the propensity to experience panic attacks, key phenomenological characteristics of those attacks, the onset of Panic Disorder, and the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy. We also show that the model identifies significant gaps in our understanding of Panic Disorder and propose a theory-driven research agenda for Panic Disorder that follows from our evaluation of the model. We conclude by discussing the implications of the model for how we understand and investigate mental disorders as complex systems. A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF PANIC 3 Advancing the Network Theory of Mental Disorders: A Computational Model of Panic Disorder The network theory of mental disorders posits that symptoms cohere, in part, because of causal relations among the symptoms themselves (Borsboom, 2017). From this perspective, mental disorders are analogous to an ecosystem. They do not appear as a coherent whole because of a shared underlying essence, but because of the web of causal interactions among the features of the disorder (Kendler, Zachar, & Craver, 2011). The notion that there are etiologically important causal interactions among symptoms has prompted the development of new methods for assessing the structure of relationships among symptoms (Epskamp, Maris, Waldorp, & Borsboom, 2016; Epskamp, Rhemtulla, & Borsboom, 2017; Marsman, Maris, Bechger, & Glas, 2015) and a host of empirical studies applying those methods across numerous psychiatric disorders (for an overview, see Fried et al., 2017). Moreover, the core idea that there are causal relations among symptoms has expanded into an overarching theory of mental disorders, how they develop, and how they remit (Borsboom, 2017). However, network theory remains abstract. It provides a conceptual framework for thinking about mental disorders but does not posit specific relationships among symptoms. Empirical network studies provide information about these relationships, but are not rich enough on their own to fully inform a network theory, as this requires a substantively interpreted model: a model that does not merely statistically associate variables, but rather specifies the mechanisms through which variables influence one another. Consequently, the network approach has produced statistical models that suggest putative network structures, but no theories that posit precisely how any given mental disorder operates as a complex system of interacting symptoms. We aim to address this gap in the literature by developing such a theory for Panic Disorder. Panic Disorder is a suitable starting point for several reasons. First, theories are A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF PANIC 4 about phenomena (Bogen & Woodward, 1988; Haig, 2005) and panic attacks are a robust phenomenon: a "stable, recurrent, and general feature of the world,” (Haig, 2005, p. 374). Experiences resembling panic appear in medical consultation reports as far back as the mid- 18th century (Coste & Granger, 2014) and have been described consistently in the medical literature since the late 19th century (Berrios, 1999; Leroux, 1889). Accordingly, these attacks are a suitable phenomenon about which to develop a theory. Second, Panic Disorder symptoms are structurally inter-connected in the network of symptoms from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM; Boschloo et al., 2015), suggesting that these symptoms commonly co-occur and, thus, represent precisely the type of phenomenon that network theory seeks to explain. Third, theorists have posited causal relations among Panic Disorder symptoms (e.g., a mutually reinforcing relationship between panic attacks and avoidance behavior; Goldstein & Chambless, 1978). Indeed, some of these relationships are embedded in the disorder’s diagnostic criteria (e.g., to meet the diagnostic criterion, avoidance behavior must be related to panic attacks; Borsboom, 2008). Fourth, there is strong body of research on the etiology, phenomenology, and epidemiology of panic attacks (Barlow, 1988; McNally, 1994). Moreover, there are well-established interventions that treat Panic Disorder (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy; Barlow, 1997) and reliable ways to induce panic attacks (e.g., biological challenges; Gorman, Liebowitz, Fyer, & Klein, 1987). This work provides criteria by which to evaluate our theory, as any theory failing to account for these empirical findings will be found wanting. The prior literature is thus sufficiently rich to both inform theory development and to provide a basis for theory evaluation. Our development of Panic Disorder theory will proceed as follows. In Section 1, we review theory and research on Panic Disorder, identifying its essential components and the posited functional relations among them. In Section 2, we integrate prior work and propose a theoretical model of Panic Disorder as a complex system, formalizing the relationships A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF PANIC 5 among individual symptoms of Panic Disorder in a mathematical model. In Section 3, we implement this model in R, a freely available software environment for statistical computing (R Core Team, 2014). Computational modeling is an effective tool for theory development because it allows us to simulate the model’s behavior and assess what the theory can and cannot explain (Epstein, 2008). We will show that the model can explain a great deal, including core phenomenological qualities of panic attacks, individual differences in the vulnerability to panic attacks, the onset of Panic Disorder following an initial panic attack, and the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for Panic Disorder. We will also show that explicating Panic Disorder theory in this way reveals significant gaps in our understanding. Moreover, the model fails to explain some key features of Panic Disorder. These shortcomings suggest further theory development is needed. In Section 4, we propose a theory-driven research agenda for Panic Disorder that follows from our evaluation of the model. We give particular focus to the need for further theory development and illustrate how such development could proceed using the model proposed here as well as a previously proposed mathematical model of panic attacks (Fukano & Gunji, 2012). Finally, in Section 5, we discuss the implications of the model for our understanding of mental disorders. Section 1: A Survey of Panic Disorder Theory and Phenomenology The symptoms identified in diagnostic manuals provide a tractable starting point for identifying the components of a mental disorder’s causal system (Borsboom, 2017). Current diagnostic criteria for Panic Disorder are rooted in work by Sigmund Freud from the late 19th century (Frances et al., 1993). In his work on anxiety neurosis, Freud described angstfallen: sudden attacks of anxiety characterized by “ideas of the extinction of life… or of a threat of madness” accompanied by intense somatic symptoms (Freud, 1962, pp. 93-94). The key features of his description can be traced from an early precursor to the DSM (American Medico-Psychological Association, 1918), through the DSM-II (American Psychiatric A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF PANIC 6 Association, 1968), to the first diagnostic criteria for anxiety neurosis (Feighner et al., 1972), where these attacks were required to include apprehension, fearfulness, or a sense of impending doom accompanied by at least four of the following six somatic symptoms: dyspnea, heart palpitations, chest pain, choking or smothering sensations, dizziness, and paresthesias. In the DSM-III, these attacks were separated into the newly created Panic Disorder diagnosis (Kendler, 2017; McNally, 1994), but the criteria used by Feighner and colleagues were largely retained, defining panic attacks by the sudden and unexpected onset of two symptoms: somatic symptoms and fear (American Psychiatric
Recommended publications
  • Panic Disorder
    Panic Disorder The Anxiety Disorders Association of America (ADAA) is a national 501 (c)3 nonprofit organization whose My heart’s pounding, mission is to promote the prevention, treatment and cure of anxiety disorders and to improve the lives of all it’s hard to breathe. people who suffer from them. Help ADAA help others. Donate now at www.adaa.org. “I feel like I’m going to go crazy or die. For information visit www.adaa.org or contact I have to get out Anxiety Disorders Association of America 8730 Georgia Ave., Ste. 600 of here NOW. Silver Spring, MD 20910 Phone: 240-485-1001 ” Anxiety Disorders Association of America What is Panic Disorder? About Anxiety Disorders We’ve all experienced that gut-wrenching fear when suddenly faced with a threatening or dangerous situation. Crossing the street as a car shoots out of nowhere, losing a child in Anxiety is a normal part of living. It’s the body’s way of telling the playground or hearing someone scream fire in a crowded us something isn’t right. It keeps us from harm’s way and theater. The momentary panic sends chills down our spines, prepares us to act quickly in the face of danger. However, for causes our hearts to beat wildly, our stomachs to knot and some people, anxiety is persistent, irrational and overwhelming. our minds to fill with terror. When the danger passes, so do It may get in the way of day-to-day activities and even make the symptoms. We’re relieved that the dreaded terror didn’t them impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Panic Disorder Issue Brief
    Panic Disorder OCTOBER | 2018 Introduction Briefings such as this one are prepared in response to petitions to add new conditions to the list of qualifying conditions for the Minnesota medical cannabis program. The intention of these briefings is to present to the Commissioner of Health, to members of the Medical Cannabis Review Panel, and to interested members of the public scientific studies of cannabis products as therapy for the petitioned condition. Brief information on the condition and its current treatment is provided to help give context to the studies. The primary focus is on clinical trials and observational studies, but for many conditions there are few of these. A selection of articles on pre-clinical studies (typically laboratory and animal model studies) will be included, especially if there are few clinical trials or observational studies. Though interpretation of surveys is usually difficult because it is unclear whether responders represent the population of interest and because of unknown validity of responses, when published in peer-reviewed journals surveys will be included for completeness. When found, published recommendations or opinions of national organizations medical organizations will be included. Searches for published clinical trials and observational studies are performed using the National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database using key words appropriate for the petitioned condition. Articles that appeared to be results of clinical trials, observational studies, or review articles of such studies, were accessed for examination. References in the articles were studied to identify additional articles that were not found on the initial search. This continued in an iterative fashion until no additional relevant articles were found.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ontogeny of Chronic Distress: Emotion Dysregulation Across The
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect The ontogeny of chronic distress: emotion dysregulation across the life span and its implications for psychological and physical health 1,2 1 1 Sheila E Crowell , Megan E Puzia and Mona Yaptangco Development is characterized by continuity and change across from a multiple-levels-of-analysis perspective across de- the lifespan. This is especially true of emotions and emotion velopment. This reveals processes by which early, bio- regulation strategies, which become increasingly complex and logically-based trait vulnerabilities interact with complex variegated over development. Recently, researchers have contextual factors, heightening risk for multiple condi- begun to characterize severe emotion dysregulation (ED) tions. From this perspective, many diagnoses that are across the life span. In particular, there is increasing data perceived as distinct can be demonstrated to have com- delineating mechanisms by which emotional distress leads to mon origins and, therefore, to co-occur at higher-than- poor health, early mortality, and intergenerational transmission expected rates at single time-points and over the life span. of psychopathology. In this review, we present converging evidence that many physical and psychological problems have The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders identifiable and treatable origins in childhood ED. When the (DSM-5 [4]) is the predominant tool for cataloging and literature is examined from an ontogenic process perspective it diagnosing mental disorders. Diagnoses are listed as becomes clear that many phenotypically distinct forms of discrete entities, in spite of a wealth of research ques- mental and physical distress emerge from the same underlying tioning the categorical system [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Mental Health Disorder Fact Sheet for the Classroom
    1 Children’s Mental Health Disorder Fact Sheet for the Classroom1 Disorder Symptoms or Behaviors About the Disorder Educational Implications Instructional Strategies and Classroom Accommodations Anxiety Frequent Absences All children feel anxious at times. Many feel stress, for example, when Students are easily frustrated and may Allow students to contract a flexible deadline for Refusal to join in social activities separated from parents; others fear the dark. Some though suffer enough have difficulty completing work. They worrisome assignments. Isolating behavior to interfere with their daily activities. Anxious students may lose friends may suffer from perfectionism and take Have the student check with the teacher or have the teacher Many physical complaints and be left out of social activities. Because they are quiet and compliant, much longer to complete work. Or they check with the student to make sure that assignments have Excessive worry about homework/grades the signs are often missed. They commonly experience academic failure may simply refuse to begin out of fear been written down correctly. Many teachers will choose to Frequent bouts of tears and low self-esteem. that they won’t be able to do anything initial an assignment notebook to indicate that information Fear of new situations right. Their fears of being embarrassed, is correct. Drug or alcohol abuse As many as 1 in 10 young people suffer from an AD. About 50% with humiliated, or failing may result in Consider modifying or adapting the curriculum to better AD also have a second AD or other behavioral disorder (e.g. school avoidance. Getting behind in their suit the student’s learning style-this may lessen his/her depression).
    [Show full text]
  • Does Psychomotor Agitation in Major Depressive Episodes Indicate Bipolarity? Evidence from the Zurich Study
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2009) 259:55–63 DOI 10.1007/s00406-008-0834-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Jules Angst Æ Alex Gamma Æ Franco Benazzi Æ Vladeta Ajdacic Æ Wulf Ro¨ssler Does psychomotor agitation in major depressive episodes indicate bipolarity? Evidence from the Zurich Study Received: 4 September 2007 / Accepted: 5 June 2008 / Published online: 19 September 2008 j Abstract Background Kraepelin’s partial interpre- were equally associated with the indicators of bipolarity tation of agitated depression as a mixed state of and with anxiety. Longitudinally, agitation and retar- ‘‘manic-depressive insanity’’ (including the current dation were significantly associated with each other concept of bipolar disorder) has recently been the focus (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.0–3.2), and this combined of much research. This paper tested whether, how, and group of major depressives showed stronger associa- to what extent both psychomotor symptoms, agitation tions with bipolarity, with both hypomanic/cyclothy- and retardation in depression are related to bipolarity mic and depressive temperamental traits, and with and anxiety. Method The prospective Zurich Study anxiety. Among agitated, non-retarded depressives, assessed psychiatric and somatic syndromes in a unipolar mood disorder was even twice as common as community sample of young adults (N = 591) (aged bipolar mood disorder. Conclusion Combined agitated 20 at first interview) by six interviews over 20 years and retarded major depressive states are more often (1979–1999). Psychomotor symptoms of agitation and bipolar than unipolar, but, in general, agitated retardation were assessed by professional interviewers depression (with or without retardation) is not more from age 22 to 40 (five interviews) on the basis of the frequently bipolar than retarded depression (with or observed and reported behaviour within the interview without agitation), and pure agitated depression is even section on depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Emotions and the Emotional Disorders: a Quantitative
    International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology ISSN: 1697-2600 [email protected] Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual España Watson, David; Clark, Lee Anna; Stasik, Sara M. Emotions and the emotional disorders: A quantitative hierarchical perspective International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, vol. 11, núm. 3, 2011, pp. 429-442 Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual Granada, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33719289001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative © International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology ISSN 1697-2600 print ISSN 2174-0852 online 2011, Vol. 11, Nº 3, pp. 429-442 Emotions and the emotional disorders: A quantitative hierarchical perspective David Watson1, Lee Anna Clark, and Sara M. Stasik (University of Notre Dame, USA) ABSTRACT. Previous evidence has established that general negative affect represents a non-specific factor common to both anxiety and depression, whereas low positive affect is more specifically related to the latter. Little is known, however, about how specific, lower order affects relate to these constructs. We investigated how six emotional disorders—major depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder, social phobia, and obsessive compulsive disorder — are linked to both general and specific types of affect in two samples (Ns = 331 and 253), using the Expanded Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS- X). Replicating previous results, the General Negative Affect scale was nonspecifically related to the emotional disorders, whereas General Positive Affect had a specific (inverse) association with major depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Anxiety Disorders: Diagnosis & Treatment
    Anxiety Disorders: Diagnosis & Treatment David Liu MD, MS Health Sciences Assistant Clinical Professor UC Davis Department of Psychiatry and Behavior Sciences Disclosures • I have no financial relationships to disclose relating to the subject matter of this presentation Learning Objectives 1. Review the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Panic Disorder 2. Recognize differential diagnosis of GAD and Panic Disorder 3. Appreciate common co-morbidities to Anxiety disorders 4. Understand approach towards management and treatment options for Anxiety disorders in the primary care setting Primary Care is the ‘De Facto’ Mental Health System What is Anxiety? Begins as ordinary, day-to-day Begins to effect situation. daily life Excessive DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Generalized Anxiety Disorder A. Excessive anxiety and worry (apprehensive expectation), occurring more days than not for at least 6 months, about a number of events or activities (such as work or school performance) B. The individual finds it difficult to control the worry. C. The anxiety and worry are associated with three (or more) of the following six symptoms (With at least some symptoms having been presents for more days than not for the past 6 months). Note: Only one item is required in children – 1. Restlessness or feeling keyed up or on edge. – 2. Being easily fatigued. – 3. Difficulty concentrating or mind going blank. – 4. Irritability. – 5. Muscle tension. – 6. Sleep disturbance (difficulty falling or staying asleep, or restless, unsatisfying sleep) DSM-5 DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (cont.) D. The anxiety, worry, or physical symptoms cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
    [Show full text]
  • Anxiety Disorders
    Anxiety Disorders Everyone experiences anxiety. However, when feelings of intense fear and distress are overwhelming and prevent us from doing everyday things, an anxiety disorder may be the cause. Anxiety disorders are the most common mental health concern in the United States. An estimated 40 million adults in the U.S., or 18%, have an anxiety disorder. Approximately 8% of children and teenagers experience the negative impact of an anxiety disorder at school and at home. Symptoms Just like with any mental illness, people with anxiety disorders experience symptoms differently. But for most people, anxiety changes how they function day-to-day. People can experience one or more of the following symptoms: Emotional symptoms: • Feelings of apprehension or dread • Feeling tense and jumpy • Restlessness or irritability • Anticipating the worst and being watchful for signs of danger Physical symptoms: • Pounding or racing heart and shortness of breath • Upset stomach • Sweating, tremors and twitches • Headaches, fatigue and insomnia • Upset stomach, frequent urination or diarrhea Types of Anxiety Disorders Different anxiety disorders have various symptoms. This also means that each type of anxiety disorder has its own treatment plan. The most common anxiety disorders include: • Panic Disorder. Characterized by panic attacks—sudden feelings of terror— sometimes striking repeatedly and without warning. Often mistaken for a heart attack, a panic attack causes powerful, physical symptoms including chest pain, heart palpitations, dizziness, shortness of breath and stomach upset. • Phobias. Most people with specific phobias have several triggers. To avoid panicking, someone with specific phobias will work hard to avoid their triggers. Depending on the type and number of triggers, this fear and the attempt to control it can seem to take over a person’s life.
    [Show full text]
  • Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia?
    WHAT ARE PANIC DISORDER AND AGORAPHOBIA? BASIC FACTS • SYMPTOMS • FAMILIES • TREATMENTS RT P SE A Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center E C I D F I A C VA Desert Pacific Healthcare Network V M R E E Long Beach VA Healthcare System N T T N A E L C IL L LN A E IC S IN Education and Dissemination Unit 06/116A S R CL ESE N & ARCH, EDUCATIO 5901 E. 7th street | Long Beach, CA 90822 basic facts Panic disorder and agoraphobia are two separate psychiatric events and environmental stressors. disorders that often occur together. Panic disorder is characterized Although much is unknown about the role of genes in the de- by recurrent and sometimes unexpected panic attacks. A panic at- velopment of panic disorder, genetics research on panic disorder tack, or “fight or flight” response, is a sudden rush of intense anx- indicates that multiple genes are likely involved. Panic and other iety with symptoms such as rapid heart rate, difficulty breathing, anxiety disorders tend to run in families, giving support to genetic numbness or tingling, and/or a fear of dying. Panic attacks usually hypotheses. In addition to genes, other risk factors need to be pres- reach their peak within minutes, but people sometimes continue ent in order for someone to develop panic disorder. For example, to feel anxious or exhausted after one occurs. In some cases, peo- many scientists believe that there is a biological contribution to ple with panic disorder experience nocturnal panic attacks, which the development and maintenance of panic disorder, such as an wake them up from sleep.
    [Show full text]
  • Agitated Depression in Bipolar Disorder
    Agitated depression in bipolar disorder Francesca Serra1, Katherine Gordon-Smith1, Amy Perry1, Christine Fraser2, Arianna Di Florio2, Nick Craddock2, Ian Jones2, Lisa Jones1 1Psychological Medicine, University of Worcester, UK 2National Centre of Mental Health, Cardiff University, UK Corresponding author: Professor Lisa Jones, Professor of Psychological Medicine University of Worcester, Henwick Grove Worcester, WR2 6AJ, UK E: [email protected] T: +44 (0)1905 54 2801 1 Acknowledgements We would like to thank all members of the Bipolar Disorder Research Network, and especially the participants who have kindly given their time to take part in our research. We thank Wellcome, the Stanley Medical Research Institute and the Aretaeus-Onlus for funding. 2 Abstract OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that agitated depression (AD) is a common, severe feature in bipolar disorder. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of AD and investigate whether presence of AD was associated with episodic and lifetime clinical features in a large well-characterised bipolar disorder sample. METHOD: The prevalence of agitation, based on semi-structured interview and medical case- notes, in the most severe depressive episode was estimated in 2925 individuals with DSM-IV bipolar disorder recruited into the UK Bipolar Disorder Research Network. Predictors of agitation were ascertained using symptoms within the same episode and lifetime clinical features using multivariate models. RESULTS: 32.3% (n=946) experienced agitation during the worst depressive episode. Within the same episode, significant predictors of presence of agitation were: insomnia (OR 2.119, p<.001), poor concentration (OR 1.966, p=.027), decreased libido (OR 1.960, p<.001), suicidal ideation (OR 1.861, p<.001), slowed activity (OR 1.504, p=.001), and poor appetite (OR 1.297, p=.029).
    [Show full text]
  • PRACTICE GUIDELINE for the Treatment of Patients with Panic Disorder
    PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Panic Disorder Second Edition WORK GROUP ON PANIC DISORDER Murray B. Stein, M.D., M.P.H., Chair Marcia K. Goin, M.D., Ph.D. Mark H. Pollack, M.D. Peter Roy-Byrne, M.D. Jitender Sareen, M.D. Naomi M. Simon, M.D., M.Sc. Laura Campbell-Sills, Ph.D., consultant STEERING COMMITTEE ON PRACTICE GUIDELINES John S. McIntyre, M.D., Chair Sara C. Charles, M.D., Vice-Chair Daniel J. Anzia, M.D. Ian A. Cook, M.D. Molly T. Finnerty, M.D. Bradley R. Johnson, M.D. James E. Nininger, M.D. Barbara Schneidman, M.D. Paul Summergrad, M.D. Sherwyn M. Woods, M.D., Ph.D. Anthony J. Carino, M.D. (fellow) Zachary Z. Freyberg, M.D., Ph.D. (fellow) Sheila Hafter Gray, M.D. (liaison) STAFF Robert Kunkle, M.A., Senior Program Manager Robert M. Plovnick, M.D., M.S., Director, Dept. of Quality Improvement and Psychiatric Services Darrel A. Regier, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Division of Research MEDICAL EDITOR Laura J. Fochtmann, M.D. Copyright 2010, American Psychiatric Association. APA makes this practice guideline freely available to promote its dissemination and use; however, copyright protections are enforced in full. No part of this guideline may be reproduced except as permitted under Sections 107 and 108 of U.S. Copyright Act. For permission for reuse, visit APPI Permissions & Licensing Center at http://www.appi.org/CustomerService/Pages/Permissions.aspx. This practice guideline was approved in July 2008 and published in January 2009. A guideline watch, summarizing significant developments in the scientific literature since publication of this guideline, may be available at http://www.psychiatryonline.com/pracGuide/pracGuideTopic_9.aspx.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anxiety Disorders
    The Anxiety Disorders M. Sean Stanley, MD Assistant Professor OHSUOHSU Psychiatry “The Desperate Man” (1844-45) Gustave Courbet Generalized Anxiety Disorder Panic Disorder Specific Phobia Social Phobia (Social Anxiety Disorder) Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Substance/Medication-Induced Anxiety Disorder OHSUAnxiety Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition Illness Anxiety Disorder Major Depressive Disorder, with anxious distress Bipolar Disorder, most recent episode manic, with anxious distress Borderline Personality Disorder What I’m talking about… and what I’m not talking about*. DSM-5 Anxiety Disorders DSM-5 Anxiety Disorder (diagnosed in children) Generalized Anxiety Disorder Selective Mutism Panic Disorder Separation Anxiety Specific Phobia Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia) DSM-5 Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders Substance/Medication-Induced Anxiety Disorder Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Anxiety Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety DSM-5 Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders DSM-5 Trans-diagnostic Specifiers Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Panic Attack DSM-5 Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders OHSUAnxious Distress Illness Anxiety Disorder Somatic Symptom Disorder *well, maybe just a little First Things First Is all anxiety bad? Anxiety/worry can help us: • Prepare for challenges • Keep ourselves and others safe • Keep up on responsibilities OHSU• Be respectful to others First Things First What is the difference between anxiety and fear? OHSU First Things First Anxiety Fear Insidious onset for to prepare for challenge Rapid onset survival response Primarily Cognitive Primarily non-cognitive Less Intense autonomic arousal Intense autonomic arousal OHSUMuscle Tension, Vigilance, Ruminative Thought Fight or flight, Escape behaviors, Tachycardia Protracted Brief/Discrete Some overlap First Things First GAD Cat Panic Cat OHSUFor most people, anxiety and fear are appropriately activated/deactivated.
    [Show full text]