“Madcap Ciss with Golliwog Curls”: Race-Ing and Erasing the Body Feminine in Ulysses’ “Nausicaa”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
“Madcap Ciss with Golliwog Curls”: Race-ing and Erasing the Body Feminine in Ulysses’ “Nausicaa” * 정혜연 37) The prognathous Paddy with ape-like features was a conventional representation of the Irish in the late nineteenth to the early twentieth century. Paddy moseyed along the imagination of the British imperialists as the “missing link” between apes and black Africans. One popular cartoon titled “The King of A-Shantee” shows Paddy and his wife Bridget in their native habitat, a shanty. As Vincent Cheng observes, the British, articulating the logic of white male dominance and social stratification, punned on the word “A-Shantee” and paralleled this “essentialized Irish pair” with the African Ashanti as a way to reinforce the idea of Irish racial inferiority.1) Cissy Caffrey, with her “golliwog Figure 1. “The King of A-Shantee” * 성신여자대학교 영어영문학과 조교수 1) Vincent. J. Cheng, 1995, Joyce, Race, and Empire (Cambridge UP, New York & Cambridge) p. 33 128 인문과학연구 제31집 curls”2) is an unruly Joycean lass from Paddy and Bridget’s brood.3) In “Nausicaa,” she is the cross-dressing, tomboyish, impudent “dark one with the mop head and the nigger mouth [sic],” whose full lips are made to whistle impudent tunes.4) “Raced” as black, Cissy also appears as a “shilling whore” in “Circe”:5) as we can see, Cissy’s body is inscribed with overt markers which render her the racial/sexual Other and places her beyond the polite society of the Dublin gentry. Considering that racializing and feminizing the Irish were disenfranchising strategies oft employed by the patriarchal British empire, one may question why James Joyce, who severely criticized British political oppression over the Irish, would recycle such offensive and incendiary stereotypes in his modernist tour de force, Ulysses (1922). One simple answer is that Cissy, placed under double jeopardy by the blackening and the gendering of her body, can be seen as an embodiment of Ireland, and Joyce was trying to explore through Cissy the precarious positionality of Ireland. Admittedly, a study of Joyce’s Cissy 2) James Joyce, 1990, Ulysses (Vintage International, New York) p. 353 In this essay, I will henceforth abbreviate Ulysses as U. 3) Based on a 19th century children’s book character, the golliwog was a type of rag doll with “black skin, eyes rimmed in white, clown lips, and frizzy hair” (“Golliwogg”). In its outward appearance, the golliwog shares close proximity to “Topsy,” and “Sambo,” two popular racist caricatures of blacks. This similarity is made all the more evident when set against the description of Topsy in Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852): “[Topsy] was one of the blackest of her race; and her round, shining eyes, glittering as glass beads, moved with quick and restless glances over everything in the room. Her mouth half open with astonishment at the wonders of the new Mas’r’s parlor, displayed a white and brilliant set of teeth. Her woolly hair was braided in sundry little tails, which stuck out in every direction. [...] Altogether, there was something odd and goblin-like about her appearance-something [...] ‘so heathenish’”(258). Despite the great popularity of the golliwog, the doll (not surprisingly) sparked public outrage as it was seen as racist; in the UK, golliwog is thought to have been abbreviated to ‘wog’ [sic], a “racial slur applied to [all] dark-skinned people” (“Golliwogg”). 4) James Joyce, 1990, op.cit., p. 371 5) Ibid., p. 587 “Madcap Ciss with Golliwog Curls” ❚ 정혜연 129 enables us to scrutinize his political commentary on the intersecting ideologies of race, gender, and colonialism. Nonetheless, we would be remiss to facilely accept the blackening of Cissy as Joyce’s critique on the plights of the Irish in British-occupied Ireland; this essay thus inspects the problematic characterization of Cissy, which places her as the polar opposite of Gerty MacDowell who, according to Suzette Henke, is the “second most prominent female character in Ulysses” and appears as the very epitome of conventional femininity.6) While one is embraced as protagonist Bloom’s sexual fantasy and the other repudiated, both Gerty and Cissy, in a sense, are products of a masculinist discourse which strips them of their agency; along these lines, I will also look into the narrative structure of “Nausicaa,” which awards only to immediately divest the authority of female narrative voice. In lieu of extending the racism/misogyny debate in Joyce’s magnum opus, I aim to re-read the chapter with Cissy at its core and reconsider the vestiges of racist and sexist discourse which may unwittingly have become elided by the urgency to figure Cissy as Ireland incarnate. At this juncture, it may be useful to contextualize “Nausicaa” with a discussion of the sexual and racial stereotyping of Ireland. In the nineteenth century, issues of race and racial categorization preoccupied the minds of the British. Such remarks made by Benjamin Disraeli who argued that “[r]ace implies difference, difference implies superiority, and superiority leads to predominance”7) instigated the Britons’ zeal to validate their dominance over, colonization of, and racist policies towards the Irish, the Africans, and other colonized people who, as a rule, were considered to be of a distinct race 6) Suzette Henke, 1982, “Gerty MacDowell: Joyce’s Sentimental Heroine” Women in Joyce (U of Illinois P, Urbana & Chicago) p. 132 7) Herbert H. Odom, 1967, “Generalizations of Race in Nineteenth-Century Physical Anthropology” Isis 58 p. 9 130 인문과학연구 제31집 from the Anglo-Saxons and thus lacking “sympathy with the English character.”8) Implementing a strict racial binary, the British endowed these contemptible Others with traits feared and despised by the respectable Englishmen; subsequently, Paddy and Bridget were lambasted as “childish, emotionally unstable, ignorant, indolent, superstitious, primitive or semi-civilized, dirty, vengeful, and violent” savages, who have been “savages since the world began, and will be forever savages.”9) In this way, Victorian discourse solidified the image of the Irish as barbarians, dependent upon the governance and the benevolence of the British Empire. And acting upon a persistent attempt to bind the Irish with other “barbarians,” the British went so far as to manufacture arbitrary criteria to prove the Irish as “white niggers” [sic] or “Europe’s blacks.” For instance, John Beddoe, an influential Victorian ethnologist, developed the “index of nigriscence” to specify one’s racial and ethnic identity by calculating the amount of melanin in skin, eyes, and hair. Inevitably, Beddoe’s criterion provided “scientific” evidence to confirm the African genesis of the “Africanoid” Celts.10) The nigrification of the Irish led to their infantilization, and not unlike their American “Negro” counterparts Topsy and Sambo, Paddy and Bridget were demoted to “neglected and badly brought up children” lacking autonomy.11) Yet another step in the disenfranchisement of the Irish led to their feminization, which is not surprising since many literary critics and social scientists have expounded upon the knot of complicity between societal hierarchies of race and gender. L. P Curtis notes that the feminization of 8) Vincent J. Cheng, 1995, op, cit., p. 21 9) Ibid., p. 20, 28 10) Ibid., p. 31 11) Ibid., p. 27 “Madcap Ciss with Golliwog Curls” ❚ 정혜연 131 the Irish alludes to an implicit collusion between patriarchal and imperial notions of autonomy. Underscoring the relevance of an “assumed connection between femininity and unfitness for self-government,” Curtis submits that: The habit of assigning sexual genders to various races and nation [...] in a period when demands for female suffrage were being resisted by the overwhelming majority of Parliament, when the very idea of female emancipation aroused deep fears among the male members of the population, the assignment of feminine traits of mind to a people like the Irish certainly did not enhance their claim for political emancipation [and] the self-consciously mature and virile Anglo-Saxon had no intention of conferring his sophisticated institutions upon the childlike and feminine Irish Celts, as also on women and children.12) In a word, the feminization of the Irish, in tandem with their infantilization and nigrification, were strategies undertaken to confiscate the Irish of their political agency and self-sufficiency. Without a doubt, Joyce lived in “an era of gendered racialism; it colored the world narratives of philosophy, history, government, and science [and he] imbibed it as much as others did.”13) Joyce was very much a product of the racist (as well as sexist) discourse of his time. Still, many critics have made attempts (perhaps rightfully so) to safeguard Joyce against allegations of racism and other forms of prejudice; maintaining that Ulysses is a novel that “publicly [...] parodies racialism,” Laura Doyle italicizes that Joyce had “the originality to reject this kind of masculinist racialism.”14) Vincent 12) L. P. Curtis, Jr., 1968, Anglo-Saxon and Celts: A Study of Anti-Irish Prejudice in Victorian England (U of Bridgeport P, Bridgeport) pp. 61-2 13) Laura Doyle, 1993, “Races and Chains: The Sexuo-Racial Matrix in Ulysses” Joyce: The Return of the Repressed (Cornell UP, Ithaca & London) p. 154 14) Ibid., p. 154 132 인문과학연구 제31집 Cheng too contends that Joyce wrote insistently from the perspective of a colonial subject of an oppressive empire and that he was cognizant of the devastating corollaries of and expressed distinct distaste for such racist discourse.