A Review of the Effects of Recreational Interactions Within UK European Marine Sites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Review of the Effects of Recreational Interactions Within UK European Marine Sites A review of the effects of recreational interactions within UK European marine sites November 2000 Prepared for the UK Marine SACs Project, Task Manager Sarah Soffe, Countryside Council for Wales Report By: UK CEED Marine in association with Bournemouth University, Centre for Coastal Conservation and Education. Catherine Saunders, Jonathan Selwyn, Sam Richardson Vince May, Carolyn Heeps This report is produced with the financial support of the Environment Agency and as part of the UK Marine SACs Project – a joint venture involving English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage, Countryside Council for Wales, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Environment and Heritage Service Northern Ireland and Scottish Association for Marine Science and the financial support of the European Commission’s LIFE – Nature Programme. 1 Acknowledgements Throughout the development of this report considerable support and assistance has been provided by many organisations and individuals. Particular thanks are extended to recreational and industry representatives, especially Jerry Eardley of the Royal Yachting Association (RYA) and Fergal Quinn of the British Marine Industries Federation (BMIF), who provided essential links with individuals in demonstration areas and enabled the collection of valuable site specific information. The time and effort expended by those who reviewed the report at the various stages of drafting is also appreciated. Thanks are also extended to the Marine Special Areas of Conservation (mSAC) officers in demonstration sites, who provided a valuable insight into the issues associated with management for nature conservation in the field. Particular thanks go to the members of the steering group and to Sarah Soffe, for all their valuable support and assistance during the course of the study. Catherine Saunders July 1999 Citation UK CEED 2000. A review of the effects of recreational interactions within UK European marine sites. Countryside Council for Wales (UK Marine SACs Project) 264 Pages The UK Centre for Economic and Environmental Development, Suite E, 3 King’s Parade, Cambridge, CB2 1SJ Email: [email protected] Website: www.ukceed.org 2 Preface The 1990s have witnessed a “call to action” for marine biodiversity conservation. The global Convention on Biodiversity, the European Union’s Habitats Directive and recent developments to the Oslo and Paris Convention have each provided a significant step forward. In each case marine protected areas are identified as having a key role in sustaining marine biodiversity. The Habitats Directive requires the maintenance or restoration of natural habitats and species of European interest at favourable conservation status, with the management of a network of Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) being one of the main vehicles to achieving this. Among the habitats and species specified in the Annexes I and II of the Directive, several are marine features and SACs have already been selected for many of these in the UK. But to manage specific habitats and species effectively there needs to be clear understanding of their distribution, biology and ecology and their sensitivity to change. From such a foundation, realistic guidance on management and monitoring can be derived and applied. One initiative now underway to help implement the Habitats Directive is the UK Marine SACs LIFE Project, involving a four year partnership (1996-2001) between: English Nature Scottish Natural Heritage Countryside Council for Wales Environment and Heritage Service, Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland Joint Nature Conservation Committee, and Scottish Association of Marine Science. The overall goal of the Project is to establish management schemes on 12 of the candidate marine SAC sites. A key component of the Project is to assess the interactions that can take place between human activities and the Annex I and II interest features on these sites. This understanding will provide for better management of these features by defining those activities that may have a beneficial, neutral or harmful impact and by giving examples of management measures that will prevent or minimise adverse effects. Seven areas where human activity may impact on marine features were identified for study, ranging from specific categories of activity to broad potential impacts. They are: port and harbour operations recreational user interactions collecting bait and shoreline animals water quality in lagoons water quality in coastal areas aggregate extraction fisheries. These seven were selected on the grounds that each includes issues that need to be considered by relevant authorities in managing many of the marine SACs. In each case, the existing knowledge is often extensive but widely dispersed and needs collating as guidance for the specific purpose of managing marine SACs. The reports from these studies are the result of specialist input and wide consultation with representatives of both the nature conservation, user and interest bodies. They are aimed at staff from the relevant authorities who jointly have the responsibility for assessing activities on 3 marine SACs and ensuring appropriate management. But they will also provide a valuable resource for industry, user and interest groups who have an important role in advising relevant authorities and for practitioners elsewhere in Europe. The reports provide a sound basis on which to make management decisions on marine SACs and also on other related initiatives such as the Biodiversity Action Plans and Oslo and Paris Convention. As a result, they will make a substantial contribution to the conservation of our important marine wildlife. We commend them to all concerned with the sustainable use and conservation of our marine and coastal heritage. Sue Collins Dr Margaret Hill Chair, UK Marine SACs Project Head Maritime and Earth Science Branch Director, English Nature Countryside Council for Wales 4 Contents Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................2 Preface...........................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary .....................................................................................................9 English……………………………………………………………………………..9 Welsh…………………………………………………………………………..…17 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................25 1.1 The Aim of the Guidelines .............................................................................25 1.2 Background to European Marine Sites...........................................................25 1.3 The Scope of the Guidelines...........................................................................28 1.4 Approach to the Study ....................................................................................30 1.5 How to Use this Guide....................................................................................32 1.6 Summary.........................................................................................................35 2. Marine Features and their Sensitivity...............................................................37 2.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................37 2.2 Estuaries..........................................................................................................38 2.3 Mud and Sand Flats Not Covered by Sea Water at Low Tide........................41 2.4 Subtidal Sandbanks.........................................................................................42 2.5 Large Shallow Inlets and Bays .......................................................................43 2.6 Lagoons...........................................................................................................44 2.7 Reefs ...............................................................................................................45 2.8 Submerged or Partly Submerged Sea Caves ..................................................46 2.9 Grey & Common Seal ....................................................................................47 2.10 Bottlenose Dolphins........................................................................................49 2.11 Summary.........................................................................................................50 3. Recreation and the Marine Environment .........................................................53 3.1 The Benefits of Recreation for Nature Conservation .....................................53 3.2 The Importance of Recreation ........................................................................54 3.3 Trends in Recreational and Leisure Participation...........................................54 3.4 Findings from the Questionnaire Surveys ......................................................56 3.5 Summary.........................................................................................................63 4. Potential Effects of Water-based Recreation....................................................65 4.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................65 4.2 Engine Emissions............................................................................................65 4.3 Noise Disturbance...........................................................................................68
Recommended publications
  • Thoroton Society Publications
    THOROTON SOCIETY Record Series Blagg, T.M. ed., Seventeenth Century Parish Register Transcripts belonging to the peculiar of Southwell, Thoroton Society Record Series, 1 (1903) Leadam, I.S. ed., The Domesday of Inclosures for Nottinghamshire. From the Returns to the Inclosure Commissioners of 1517, in the Public Record Office, Thoroton Society Record Series, 2 (1904) Phillimore, W.P.W. ed., Abstracts of the Inquisitiones Post Mortem relating to Nottinghamshire. Vol. I: Henry VII and Henry VIII, 1485 to 1546, Thoroton Society Record Series, 3 (1905) Standish, J. ed., Abstracts of the Inquisitiones Post Mortem relating to Nottinghamshire. Vol. II: Edward I and Edward II, 1279 to 1321, Thoroton Society Record Series, 4 (1914) Tate, W.E., Parliamentary Land Enclosures in the county of Nottingham during the 18th and 19th Centuries (1743-1868), Thoroton Society Record Series, 5 (1935) Blagg, T.M. ed., Abstracts of the Inquisitiones Post Mortem and other Inquisitions relating to Nottinghamshire. Vol. III: Edward II and Edward III, 1321 to 1350, Thoroton Society Record Series, 6 (1939) Hodgkinson, R.F.B., The Account Books of the Gilds of St. George and St. Mary in the church of St. Peter, Nottingham, Thoroton Society Record Series, 7 (1939) Gray, D. ed., Newstead Priory Cartulary, 1344, and other archives, Thoroton Society Record Series, 8 (1940) Young, E.; Blagg, T.M. ed., A History of Colston Bassett, Nottinghamshire, Thoroton Society Record Series, 9 (1942) Blagg, T.M. ed., Abstracts of the Bonds and Allegations for Marriage Licenses in the Archdeaconry Court of Nottingham, 1754-1770, Thoroton Society Record Series, 10 (1947) Blagg, T.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Elkhorn Slough Estuary
    A RICH NATURAL RESOURCE YOU CAN HELP! Elkhorn Slough Estuary WATER QUALITY REPORT CARD Located on Monterey Bay, Elkhorn Slough and surround- There are several ways we can all help improve water 2015 ing wetlands comprise a network of estuarine habitats that quality in our communities: include salt and brackish marshes, mudflats, and tidal • Limit the use of fertilizers in your garden. channels. • Maintain septic systems to avoid leakages. • Dispose of pharmaceuticals properly, and prevent Estuarine wetlands harsh soaps and other contaminants from running are rare in California, into storm drains. and provide important • Buy produce from local farmers applying habitat for many spe- sustainable management practices. cies. Elkhorn Slough • Vote for the environment by supporting candidates provides special refuge and bills favoring clean water and habitat for a large number of restoration. sea otters, which rest, • Let your elected representatives and district forage and raise pups officials know you care about water quality in in the shallow waters, Elkhorn Slough and support efforts to reduce question: How is the water in Elkhorn Slough? and nap on the salt marshes. Migratory shorebirds by the polluted run-off and to restore wetlands. thousands stop here to rest and feed on tiny creatures in • Attend meetings of the Central Coast Regional answer: It could be a lot better… the mud. Leopard sharks by the hundreds come into the Water Quality Control Board to share your estuary to give birth. concerns and support for action. Elkhorn Slough estuary hosts diverse wetland habitats, wildlife and recreational activities. Such diversity depends Thousands of people come to Elkhorn Slough each year JOIN OUR EFFORT! to a great extent on the quality of the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Local Nature Partnership
    Gloucestershire Local Nature Partnership ‘Call for Evidence’ Response to Gloucestershire’s Local Industrial Strategy Page 1 of 54 Gloucestershire Local Nature Partnership Local Nature Partnerships (LNPs) were formed as part of the government’s 2011 white paper “The Natural Choice: Securing the value of nature”1. As part of a framework to strengthen local action to achieve the recovery of nature, LNPs were tasked to raise awareness about the vital services and benefits that a healthy natural environment brings for people, communities and the local economy. LNPs were to contribute to the green economy and complement Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs), of which there is an expectation from government for LNPs and LEPs to form strong links that capture the value of nature. Here in Gloucestershire, the LNP is formed of over 30 organisations from public, private and third sector bodies from across the county, all working together as an informal partnership to recognise the importance of embedding nature's value in local decisions for the benefit of the nature, people and the economy. The GLNP Mission is to champion the essential role of Gloucestershire’s natural environment in sustaining a vibrant, healthy, prosperous economy and society. With a Vision of a healthy and valued natural environment, sustaining the economy and wellbeing of Gloucestershire. Our partnership provides a strong and innovative voice for the environment sector and is seen as a key partner in helping deliver the Gloucestershire County Council’s Strategy 2019-20222. We benefit from a solid working relationship with GFirst LEP, as well as all the District Councils.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Variation: On-Street Parking Charges 2021 Arun District
    WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL NOTICE OF VARIATION: ON-STREET PARKING CHARGES 2021 ARUN DISTRICT NOTICE is hereby given that West Sussex County Council in exercise of its powers under Section 46A Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and Regulation 25 of the Local Authorities Traffic Order (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996 proposes to vary the Charges and Tariffs detailed in the Second Schedule of the West Sussex County Council (Arun District) (Parking Places and Traffic Regulation) (Consolidation) Order 2010. The following charges will be changed as shown from 4 January 2021: Parking Permits: Old Charge New Charge Bognor Regis CPZ 1st Resident Annual Permit £44.00 £46.00 Subsequent Resident Annual Permit £88.00 £92.00 1st Resident 6-month Permit £24.00 £25.00 Subsequent Resident 6-month permit £48.00 £50.00 Non-Resident Annual Permit £275.00 £282.00 Non-Resident 6-month permit £145.00 £149.00 Countywide permits £25.00 £26.00 Pay and Display parking charges: Old Charge New Charge Town Per 30 mins Per Hour Per 30 mins Per Hour Centre Area £0.55 £1.10 £0.60 £1.20 Marine Per 30 mins Per Hour Per 30 mins Per Hour Drive West £0.30 £0.60 £0.35 £0.70 Esplanade Per 30 mins Per Hour Per 30 Mins Per Hour £0.55 £1.10 £0.60 £1.20 Dispensation Notices: Permit Areas in Arun: Old Charge New Charge CPZ Permit Areas £10.00 per day/£60.00 £11.00 per day/£66.00 per week per week Pay and Display Areas: Old Charge New Charge Bognor Regis Town Centre £14.00 per day/£84.00 £16.00 per day/£96.00 per week per week The Esplanade £15.00 per day/90.00 per
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Economy Overview Committee Insert Item
    Page 1–LTP Passenger Transport Strategy Agenda Item: Environment Insert and Economy Item Overview No. Committee Date of Meeting 19 January 2016 Officer Head of Economy Local Transport Plan 2011 – 2026: Passenger Transport Subject of Report Strategy Executive Summary This Passenger Transport Strategy has been developed as part of the County Council’s Holistic Transport Review and provides a framework for the programmes of work arising from the review in a way that is consistent with the objectives included in the Local Transport Plan for Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole (LTP3). The Holistic Transport Review aims to reduce the County Council’s revenue spend on passenger transport services by £1.5m over the thee-year period to March 2018. The review incorporates all activities including commissioning, procurement and administration of vehicles and transport related services including 3rd party providers. The overall objective of LTP3 is to “seek a balanced, low carbon transport system which limits the most damaging effects of car usage and provides real choice in alternatives to the private car”. Impact Assessment: Equalities Impact Assessment: An equalities impact assessment was undertaken during development of LTP3. Whilst the Passenger Transport Strategy PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com Page 2–LTP Passenger Transport Strategy proposes no new policies, it is likely that reduced funding for public transport support and any resultant reduction in service will have a disproportionate impact on older people, young people and those without access to a motor car, since people in these groups are likely to make greater use of bus services. Use of Evidence: Consultation undertaken during the development of LTP3.
    [Show full text]
  • Solent Skills Advisory Panel Local Skills and Labour Market Analysis
    Solent Skills Advisory Panel Local Skills and Labour Market Analysis June 2020 1 2 Contents Foreword 1. Introduction 7 2. Economic & Labour Market Landscape in the Solent 10 2.1 Demographics 11 2.1.1 Population by Broad Age Group 11 2.1.2 Internal and International Migration 14 2.2 Labour Market 17 2.2.1 Economic Activity 17 2.2.2 Employment 20 2.2.3 Unemployment 21 2.2.4 Commuting 23 2.3 Solent Businesses 25 2.4 Economic Landscape 28 2.4.1 Gateway Economy 28 2.4.2 Economic Output 29 2.4.3 Economic Output by Sector 32 2.5 Productivity 35 3. The Demand for Skills in the Solent 39 3.1 Industrial Structure 41 3.2 Occupational Structure 46 3.3 Skills Demand by Industry and Occupation 49 3.4 Job Vacancies and Skills Demand 51 3.5 Future Skills Demand 52 3.5.1 Expansion Demand and Replacement Demand 53 3.5.2 Net Skills Requirement by Occupation & Qualification 54 3.6 4th Industrial Revolution and Skills 58 3.6.1 Automation and Future of Employment in Solent 60 3.7 Skills for the Future 64 3 4. The Supply of Skills in 66 Solent 4.1 Skills in the Workforce: 67 4.1.1 Advanced Skills 70 4.1.2 Intermediate Skills 73 4.1.3 Low Skills 76 4.2 Skills System 79 4.2.1 Secondary Education - Participation and Attainment 79 4.2.2 Further Education - Learning and Training 83 4.2.3 Further Education - Education and Training 85 4.2.4 Further Education - Apprenticeships 91 4.2.5 Higher Education 97 4.2.6 Employer Sponsored Training 103 4.3 Skills Deprivation and Inequality 105 4.3.1 Young People Not in Education, Employment or Training (NEETs) 105 4.3.2 Education and Skills Deprivation 106 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 4A (Rule 6.2) Public Notice (General Form) in the Consistory Court of the Diocese of Southwell & Nottingham
    Ref: 2020-049572 Church: Holme Pierrepont w Adbolton: St Edmund Diocese: Southwell & Nottingham Archdeaconry: Nottingham Form 4A (Rule 6.2) Public Notice (general form) In the Consistory Court of the Diocese of Southwell & Nottingham Church of Holme Pierrepont w Adbolton: St Edmund In the parish of Holme Pierrepont and Adbolton NOTICE IS GIVEN that we are applying to the Consistory Court of the diocese for permission to carry out the following: 1 To replace existing failing lighting system with a new scheme in the Nave 2 To replace 3 central aisle lights with 2 banks x 4 lights over both banks of pews and to install spot lights (4x north side + 4 south side) where the walls meet the roof. Both sets of lights will be separately operated 3 To replace 2 lights in the south aisle. 4 All in accordance with quotation dated 3 March 2020 from Crew Electrical, West Bridgford, Nottingham and full details of lighting from Hacel Lighting Ltd, Wallsend, Newcastle upon Tyne dated 31 January 2020 Copies of the relevant plans and documents may be examined at Please contact Brenda Stevenson on 0115 974 9700 (If changes to a church are proposed, a copy of the petition and of any designs, plans, photographs and other documents that were submitted with it must be displayed in the church or at another place where they may be conveniently inspected by the public.) Petitioners: 1. BRENDA STEVENSON, EX CHURCHWARDEN - RESIGNED 31.1.2020 DUE TO ILL HEALTH 2. IAN GODSON, LAY PCC CHAIR & TEMPORARY CHURCH WARDEN 3. Date 14/05/2020 If you wish to object to any of the works or proposals you should send a letter stating the grounds of your objection to The Diocesan Registrar at Jubilee House Westgate Southwell Nottinghamshire NG25 0JH so that your letter reaches the registrar not later than 13/06/2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Invest in Dorset's Marine Sector
    Invest in Dorset’s Marine Sector LOCATION 2 hrs 45 mins DORSET Dorset is centrally located in the South 2 hrs Coast of England, within 2 hours of London by road hr 15 mins 1 London or rail and has excellent Bristol connections to the 0 - 40 mi 3 ns Midlands and the North Southampton DORSET is home to Exeter DORSET Portsmouth Calais Bournemouth Airport Plymouth and both Exeter and Southampton Airports are accessible within an hour. Bristol, London Heathrow and Gatwick Airports are within 2 hours Cherbourg Le Havre DORSET has 2 Ports & 3 Harbours providing strong links to mainland Europe. Channel Islands and Sandtander. The Port of Southampton Container Terminal is within 1 hour DORSET is home to Bournemouth University, Arts University Bournemouth, Bournemouth & Poole College, Kingston Maurward College and Weymouth College together Blandford Forum with 11 nearby universities including Southampton, Dorchester Bournemouth Bristol and Exeter. Poole Port of Poole Businesses based on the Weymouth South Coast benefit from having access to a wealth of first-class transport links. Portland Port The region is within easy reach of London’s airports with connections to all International Terminals at Heathrow and Gatwick less than an hour away. There are four international airports within one hour’s travel of the region. Why the UK? • Marine represents £17bn GVA rising to £25bn by 2020 • Easy access to the $17trillion EU market • UK exports to non EU countries growing by 14% • 8th easiest nation to do business globally • Nationally more than 5,000 companies
    [Show full text]
  • 11. Enabling Economic Growth 2015-2020 281015
    Page 1 – Enabling Economic Growth Agenda Item: Environment & 11 the Economy Overview Committee/ Cabinet Date of Meeting 20 October 2015/28 October 2015 Officer Head of Economy Subject of Report Enabling Economic Growth 2015-2020 Executive Summary Dorset County Council is committed to playing a positive and proactive role to enable sustainable economic growth, in line with the Corporate Plan 2015-18. The Enabling Economic Growth strategy has been developed to provide a clear statement of the Council’s position in relation to economic growth. It includes our vision, priorities, key sectors, and commitment to work in partnership. As a strategic document it provides an overview of the Council’s work programme in support of economic growth, and also highlights areas for further consideration and development. The business community has been engaged in the preparation of the draft strategy, and it is currently being circulated for further feedback. The views and endorsement of the Environment and the Economy Overview Committee are sought, prior to formal approval by Cabinet. Page 2 – Enabling Economic Growth Impact Assessment Equalities Impact Assessment: An assessment has been completed and signed off by the Directorate Equalities Officer. Use of Evidence: The draft strategy includes an economic review at appendix 1, which illustrates the data and intelligence used to inform the development of the strategy. This is a précis of the economic intelligence which has been scrutinised including the Local Economic Assessment for Dorset, and further data from the Research & Consultation Team. Engagement with the business community was undertaken as part of the Ask Dorset initiative, and this has informed and shaped elements of the draft strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Premises in Nottinghamshire
    Appendix A List of Approved Premises in Nottinghamshire Premises name Location Beeston Fields Golf Club Wollaton Road, Beeston Bestwood Lodge Hotel Bestwood Country Park, Arnold Blackburn House, Brake Lane, Boughton, Newark Blotts Country Club Adbolton Lane, Holme Pierrepont Bramley Suite The Bramley Centre, King Street, Southwell Charnwood Hotel Sheffield Road, Blyth, Worksop Clumber Park The National Trust, Worksop Clumber Park Hotel and Spa Worksop Cockliffe Country House Burntstump Country Park, Burntstump Hill Country Cottage Hotel Easthorpe Street, Ruddington County House Chesterfield Road South, Mansfield Deincourt Hotel London Road, Newark DH Lawrence Heritage Centre Mansfield Road, Eastwood East Bridgford Hill Kirk Hill, East Bridgford Eastwood Hall Mansfield Road, Eastwood Elms Hotel London Road, Retford Forever Green Restaurant Ransom Wood, Southwell Road, Mansfield Full Moon Main Street, Morton, Southwell Goosedale Goosedale Lane, Bestwood Village Grange Hall Vicarage Lane, Radcliffe on Trent Hodsock Priory Blyth, Nr Worksop Holme Pierrepont Hall Holme Pierrepont, Nottingham Kelham Hall Kelham, Newark Kelham House Country Manor Hotel Main Street, Kelham, Newark Lakeside 2 Waterworks House, Mansfield Road, Arnold Langar Hall Langar Leen Valley Golf Club Wigwam Lane, Hucknall Lion Hotel 112 Bridge Street, Worksop Mansfield Manor Hotel Carr Bank, Windmill Lane, Mansfield Newark Castle Castle Gate, Newark Newark Town and District Club Ltd Barnbygate House, 35 Barnbygate, Newark Newark Town Hall Market Place, Newark Newstead Abbey
    [Show full text]
  • Everglades Ridge, Slough, and Tree Island Mosaics: Year 2 Annual Report Michael S
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons SERC Research Reports Southeast Environmental Research Center 2010 Everglades Ridge, Slough, and Tree Island Mosaics: Year 2 Annual Report Michael S. Ross Southeast Environmental Research Center & Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University James B. Heffernan Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University Jay P. Sah Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University Pablo L. Ruiz Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University Adam A. Spitzig Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp Part of the Earth Sciences Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Ross, Michael S.; Heffernan, James B.; Sah, Jay P.; Ruiz, Pablo L.; Spitzig, Adam A.; and Isherwood, Ewan, "Everglades Ridge, Slough, and Tree Island Mosaics: Year 2 Annual Report" (2010). SERC Research Reports. 100. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp/100 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Southeast Environmental Research Center at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in SERC Research Reports by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Michael S. Ross, James B. Heffernan, Jay P. Sah, Pablo L. Ruiz, Adam A. Spitzig, and Ewan Isherwood This report is available at FIU Digital Commons: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp/100 Year 2 Annual Report: Everglades Ridge, Slough, and Tree Island Mosaics Date of Submission: By: Michael S. Ross, Southeast Environmental Research Center & Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th ST, Miami, FL 33199 Tel 305-348-1420; Fax 305-348-4096; Email: [email protected] James B.
    [Show full text]