DOCSLIB.ORG

Virginia Natural Heritage E-News Conserving Virginia’S Biodiversity Through Inventory, Protection and Stewardship Spring 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Virginia Natural Heritage E-News Conserving Virginia’S Biodiversity Through Inventory, Protection and Stewardship Spring 2001 Virginia Natural Heritage E-News Conserving Virginia’s Biodiversity through Inventory, Protection and Stewardship Spring 2001 NATURESERVE www.natureserve.org Honorable Phillip Puckett, Terry Porter of Mullican LAUNCHED BY ABI AND NATURAL Lumber Company, Elbert Mosteller, and Chris HERITAGE NETWORK Ludwig. It was one small step for ABI (Association for Biodiversity Information) and the Natural Heritage FIRST PHASE OF VIRGINIA NATURAL Network, and one giant leap for the field of COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION biodiversity information as ABI publicly launched COMPLETED the NatureServe website. The eagerly-awaited online Natural Heritage ecologists have completed the first conservation resource provides authoritative installment of a planned series of reports that will conservation information in a searchable database for present a comprehensive classification of natural more than 50,000 plants, animals, and ecological communities in Virginia. The first approximation communities of the United States and Canada. In a provides an updated version of the state classification brief story that included a color graphic of the which conceptually defines and describes 120 broad NatureServe home page, Science magazine (Sept. 22, ecological community groups in the Commonwealth. 2000) described NatureServe as "a 25-year trove of It provides a standard for community nomenclature, field data on the plants and animals of the United as well as information useful to the field States and Canada.” The site is already receiving identification of communities and the prioritization of more than 1,000 unique visits per day. To view the conservation sites. Future installments will develop site and provide user feedback, go to the classification and description of community types www.natureserve.org. This website is a great within each of the ecological community groups. example of something that the Natural Heritage The report can be viewed and printed at Network can accomplish by working together. http://www.dcr.state.va.us/dnh/rare.htm. 30th STATE NATURAL AREA PRESERVE CHESAPEAKE AND VIRGINIA BEACH DEDICATED CONSERVATION PLAN DCR held a ceremony in Cleveland, Russell County to dedicate the 30th State Natural Area Preserve. The 501 acre preserve was acquired with funds from the 1992 Park and Natural Areas Bond. Cleveland Barrens was discovered in 1995-96 by Chris Ludwig, Natural Heritage Chief Biologist and contains the globally rare Dolomite Barren community, 13 rare plants, and three known rare animals. The Nature Natural Heritage prepared a Conservation Plan for Conservancy assisted in the site’s protection. the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission to Speakers included the Honorable David Brickley, assist with the NOAA-sponsored Southern Watershed Bill Kittrell, Director-TNC Clinch Valley Program, Management Program (SWAMP). SWAMP seeks to the Honorable Clarence “Bud” Phillips, the protect and enhance the natural resources, sensitive lands, and water supplies of the southern watersheds Virginia Natural Heritage E-News Spring 2001 1 of Chesapeake and Virginia Beach while maintaining Virginia Chapter of the Audubon Society used a balance with economic development opportunities. chapter funds and private gifts as well as a grant from The Conservation Plan provides a science-based the Virginia Land Conservation Fund to purchase the foundation for conserving the area’s biological 254 acre site from Lancaster County, which had resources, and integrates with three other SWAMP originally proposed to develop an industrial park on components: an Agriculture Plan, a Multiple Benefits the site. The natural area contains a mature Conservation Plan (addressing wetlands mitigation bottomland hardwood forest. The dedication issues), and a Rural Area Preservation Program. ceremony was highlighted by presentations from Mr. Henry Bashore and Mr. Tom Teeples of the Northern The Conservation Plan addresses the social and Neck Audubon and DCR Director David Brickley economic benefits of retaining intact natural and Secretary of Natural Resources John Paul ecosystems and open-space as integrated components Woodley. More than forty friends of Hickory of the community. The Conservation Plan presents a Hollow attended the ceremony. set of options for landscape level conservation that provide increasing levels of natural resource CAT PONDS PLACED ON VIRGINIA conservation. REGISTRY OF NATURAL AREAS Cat Ponds in Isle of Wight County has 14 rare CONSERVATION LANDS PROJECT species and communities including one rare natural Under a recent charge to be the official repository for community, seven rare plant species, a rare the Commonwealth’s “Conservation Lands Data damselfly, four rare amphibians, and the state Layer”, Natural Heritage staff have been busy endangered chicken turtle. The landowner has been building a geographic information system (GIS) data awarded a plaque and certificate for placing his layer for all the public and privately protected property on the Department of Conservation and conservation lands in Virginia. The GIS layer Recreation’s Virginia Registry of Natural Areas. contains boundaries and information on all local government, state, and federal protected lands, and lands owned or held in easement by private non- profit conservation organizations that contain natural habitat. Within the year the data will be available over a publicly accessible internet site. CEDARS NATURAL AREA PRESERVE ADDITIONS DCR added 274.5 acres to the Cedars Natural Area Preserve in Lee County. The new additions contain Cat Ponds, Isle of Wight County exemplary prairie glades, one of three sites in the world for the Running glade clover, and a suite of other rare plants. The total acreage for The Cedars NEW SMALL WHORLED POGONIA Natural Area Preserve will now be 531 acres. OCCURRENCE FOUND AT QUANTICO MARINE CORPS BASE Surveys for the rare orchid small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) (G2G3/S2) were conducted in 2000 by Natural Heritage field botanists in selected timber compartments at Quantico Marine Corps Base. The survey resulted in the finding of one new occurrence. This species has been listed as Threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act Running glade clover (Trifolium calcaricum) and endangered under the Virginia Endangered Plant (G1/S1) and Insect Species Act. Twelve occurrences of this species have previously been found on the Base. HICKORY HOLLOW DEDICATED INTO Small whorled pogonia is an orchid found in the NATURAL AREA PRESERVE SYSTEM eastern and midwestern US and Ontario, Canada in The Hickory Hollow Natural Area in Lancaster second or third growth hardwood forests. County has been formally dedicated as Virginia's 29th Natural Area Preserve. The Northern Neck of Virginia Natural Heritage E-News Spring 2001 2 ENDANGERED PLANT LOCATED IN amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus) was submitted to the ALLEGHANY COUNTY U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No new populations Three occurrences of shale-barren rockcress (Arabis of either of these species were found in 2000. serotina) were located in Alleghany County by Seabeach amaranth has not been found in Virginia Natural Heritage field botanists. This plant is listed since 1972. Endangered under both the federal Endangered Species Act and the Virginia Endangered Plant and WESTVACO NATURAL HERITAGE Insect Species Act. All occurrences were located on INVENTORY the James River District of the George Washington Thanks to The Nature Conservancy and Westvaco National Forest during a shale barren inventory for Corporation, the Division of Natural Heritage is the U.S. Forest Service. Two of the occurrences currently conducting an inventory of Westvaco’s were located along Blue Suck Run southwest of Virginia land holdings. The inventory is a result of a Longdale Furnace and the third along Johns Run west five-year cooperative agreement between TNC and of Covington. The largest occurrence was comprised Westvaco. Survey sites in the Virginia Piedmont of 11 flowering individuals and 19 rosettes. and Mountains have been selected using Westvaco’s comprehensive GIS information. The inventory will HISTORICAL SENSITIVE JOINT-VETCH focus on ecologically significant communities, along POPULATION REDISCOVERED with botanical and zoological work. Highlights of A population of the federally threatened plant species the 2000 field season included two new populations sensitive joint-vetch (Aeschynomene virginica) of the federally endangered smooth coneflower (G2/S2), last documented in 1939 along Back River (Echinacea laevigata) in Amherst County, thanks to at Colonial National Historical Park, was the assistance of a local naturalist. Smooth rediscovered in 2000 by a Natural Heritage field coneflower is known from Virginia, North Carolina, botanist. Sensitive joint-vetch is a member of the pea South Carolina, and Georgia. Surveys during the family found in fresh to slightly brackish tidal winter of 2000-2001 have documented new marshes from New Jersey to North Carolina. community occurrences including an Ultramafic Eighteen populations are extant in Virginia. The Woodland, a Basic- Oak Hickory Forest, a Piedmont Colonial NHP population, once apparently along the Hardpan Forest, and an Eastern Hemlock Forest. Back River channel and unsuccessfully searched for Inventory work is now focused on the mountain over the last decade, is currently found in an interior holdings of Westvaco. marsh location associated with the edge of an old road through the marsh that leads to a former ferry MELICA NITENS FOUND AT PATTERSON landing. The survey was conducted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amaranthus Pumilus (Seabeach Amaranth)
    Bartonia No. 61, 2002-News and Notes Amaranthus pumilus Raf. (Seabeach Amaranth, Amaranthaceae) Rediscovered in Sussex County, Delaware In August of 2000, Amaranthus pumilus was rediscovered in Sussex Co., Delaware after 125 years without a sighting. It was first collected in Delaware in 1875 by Albert Commons (10 September 1875, A. Commons, s.n., "seabeach, Baltimore Hundred, Delaware," PH). Amaranthus pumilus was federally listed as threatened by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 1993. Historically, this species was known from Massachusetts south to South Carolina (Weakley et al. 1996). Amaranthus pumilus was reported as rediscovered at Assateague Island National Seashore, Worcester County, Maryland in 1998 (Ramsey 2000). Prior to rediscovery on Assateague Island and in Sussex County, A. pumilus was extant on Long Island, New York, and in North Carolina and South Carolina. Lisa Marie Kendall of the Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Delaware Department of Natural Resources discovered the first plants on 7 August 2000. Subsequent surveys revealed a total of 41 individuals scattered over 22 kilometers of Atlantic shoreline. All plants found are within the boundaries of Delaware Seashore and Fenwick Island State Parks. The largest number of plants (28) was found within a 1.5-km stretch of shoreline near the swimming beach at Delaware Seashore State Park. This section of beach is the only area where A. pumilus was found that is off-limits to vehicular traffic. This area provides the best habitat for the long-term survival of A. pumilus. Individual plants were found growing on relatively open sand near the base of the primary foredune.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Risk Assessment for Vitex Rotundifolia L. F. (Lamiaceae)
    Weed Risk Assessment for Vitex United States rotundifolia L. f. (Lamiaceae) – Beach Department of Agriculture vitex Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service June 4, 2013 Version 2 Left: Infestation in South Carolina growing down to water line and with runners and fruit stripped by major winter storm (Randy Westbrooks, U.S. Geological Survey, Bugwood.org). Right: A runner with flowering shoots (Forest and Kim Starr, Starr Environmental, Bugwood.org). Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Vitex rotundifolia Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is defined as “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000). We use weed risk assessment (WRA)—specifically, the PPQ WRA model (Koop et al., 2012)—to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. Because the PPQ WRA model is geographically and climatically neutral, it can be used to evaluate the baseline invasive/weed potential of any plant species for the entire United States or for any area within it.
    [Show full text]
  • Vitex Rotundifolia L.F
    NEW YORK NON -NATIVE PLANT INVASIVENESS RANKING FORM Scientific name: Vitex rotundifolia L.f. USDA Plants Code: VIRO80 Common names: Roundleaf chastetree, beach vitex, chasteberry, monk's pepper Native distribution: Asia (China, Japan), India, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Australia, Pacific Islands (inlcuding Hawaii) Date assessed: 3 June 2009; edited August 19, 2009 Assessors: Steve Glenn, Gerry Moore Reviewers: LIISMA SRC Date Approved: August 19, 2009 Form version date: 3 March 2009 New York Invasiveness Rank: High (Relative Maximum Score 70.00-80.00) Distribution and Invasiveness Rank ( Obtain from PRISM invasiveness ranking form ) PRISM Status of this species in each PRISM: Current Distribution Invasiveness Rank 1 Adirondack Park Invasive Program Not Assessed Not Assessed 2 Capital/Mohawk Not Assessed Not Assessed 3 Catskill Regional Invasive Species Partnership Not Assessed Not Assessed 4 Finger Lakes Not Assessed Not Assessed 5 Long Island Invasive Species Management Area Not Present Moderate 6 Lower Hudson Not Assessed Not Assessed 7 Saint Lawrence/Eastern Lake Ontario Not Assessed Not Assessed 8 Western New York Not Assessed Not Assessed Invasiveness Ranking Summary Total (Total Answered*) Total (see details under appropriate sub-section) Possible 1 Ecological impact 40 ( 40 ) 37 2 Biological characteristic and dispersal ability 25 ( 25 ) 20 3 Ecological amplitude and distribution 25 ( 25 ) 4 4 Difficulty of control 10 ( 10 ) 8 Outcome score 100 ( 100 )b 73.00 a † Relative maximum score 73.00 § New York Invasiveness Rank High (Relative Maximum Score 70.00-80.00) * For questions answered “unknown” do not include point value in “Total Answered Points Possible.” If “Total Answered Points Possible” is less than 70.00 points, then the overall invasive rank should be listed as “Unknown.” †Calculated as 100(a/b) to two decimal places.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Coastal Zone Management Magazine Is Funded Through a Grant from the U.S
    Virginia Coastal Zone Management Spring/Summer 2007 IN THIS ISSUE: Living Shorelines Coastal GEMS The Rap on Oysters CZM & Land Conservation 400 Years of Change Protecting, restoring, strengthening our coastal ecosystems & economy Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program The Virginia CZM Program is a network of state and local government agencies working to create more vital and sustainable coastal communities and ecosystems. Virginia’s coastal zone includes the 29 counties and 17 cities of Tidewater Virginia and all tidal waters out to the three mile territorial sea boundary. The Virginia CZM Program includes state and local laws and policies to protect and manage Virginia’s coastal resources, implemented by: Virginia Department of Environmental Quality– lead agency Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Virginia Department of Health Virginia Marine Resources Commission Tidewater Local Governments The Program is guided by the Coastal Policy Team which provides a forum for managing cross-cutting coastal resource issues.The Coastal Policy Team is comprised of the partner agencies listed above as well as: Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs Virginia Department of Forestry Virginia Department of Historic Resources Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Economic Development Partnership Virginia Institute of Marine Science Virginia Planning District Commissions (8 Tidewater regions) The Virginia CZM Program is part of the national coastal zone management program, a voluntary partnership between the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and U.S. coastal states and territories authorized by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The Virginia Coastal Zone Management magazine is funded through a grant from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Uninhabited, Undeveloped Barrier Island. (Under the Direction of Thomas R
    ABSTRACT ROSENFELD, KRISTEN MARIE. Ecology of Bird Island, North Carolina: an uninhabited, undeveloped barrier island. (Under the direction of Thomas R. Wentworth.) Barrier islands include some of the most endangered and fragmented ecosystems on the Atlantic coast, providing critical habitat for many species, including some that are threatened and endangered. As the vast majority of these islands have been developed for human usage study and protection of the few remaining undeveloped and undisturbed islands is critical. This study was undertaken in order to characterize the vascular plant communities on Bird Island, an uninhabited, undeveloped barrier island on the border of North and South Carolina, with the objectives of a thorough survey of flora, vegetation, and environment, classification of plant communities, and multivariate analysis of vegetation and environmental data. A floristic inventory of the island and its associated marshes was conducted during the growing season (May- November) of 2002 and 2003. One hundred four 100m2 plots were inventoried for vegetation and environment using protocols developed by the Carolina Vegetation Survey. Plant communities were identified according to the National Vegetation Classification, the Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, and the Carolina Vegetation Survey. Interpretation of vegetation patterns was based on multivariate analysis of vegetation and environmental data. Ninety-one vascular plant species in 35 families, including 4 exotic species, were distributed across 12 communities. Communities on Bird Island appear to be distinctive when compared to those described for other barrier islands in the region. Additionally, the vegetation survey on Bird Island revealed suitable habitat for the federally listed Seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus); an important dune-building annual of the North American Atlantic coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Thurston Haworth Recreation Area Management Plan
    THURSTON HAWORTH RECREATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by: MIDDLE PENINSULA CHESAPEAKE BAY PUBLIC ACCESS AUTHORITY In cooperation with: Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program (Department of Environmental Quality) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Dragon Run Steering Committee The Nature Conservancy This work was funded by the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program at the Department of Environmental Quality through Grant # NA07NOS4190178 Task 95 of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its subagencies. Although this report has been used by the Middle Peninsula Chesapeake Bay Public Access Authority, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the MPCBPAA as to the accuracy or application of datasets and related material, nor shall the fact of distribution constitute any such warranty; and no responsibility is assumed by the Authority in connection therewith. Middle Peninsula Chesapeake Bay Public Access Authority P.O. Box 286 Saluda, Virginia 23149 804-758-2311 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS __________________________________________________________ Executive Summary 4 Section One: Management Alternatives and Environmental Consequences 7 Introduction and Legislative Authorization 7 Establishment of the Middle Peninsula Chesapeake Bay Public Access Authority 7 Ecological Value of the Dragon Run Watershed
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetics and Phylogenetic Context of Weed Evolution in the Genus Amaranthus: Amaranthaceae) Katherine Waselkov Washington University in St
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) Summer 8-12-2013 Population Genetics and Phylogenetic Context of Weed Evolution in the Genus Amaranthus: Amaranthaceae) Katherine Waselkov Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Recommended Citation Waselkov, Katherine, "Population Genetics and Phylogenetic Context of Weed Evolution in the Genus Amaranthus: Amaranthaceae)" (2013). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 1162. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/1162 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences Evolution, Ecology and Population Biology Dissertation Examination Committee: Kenneth M. Olsen, Chair James M. Cheverud Allan Larson Peter H. Raven Barbara A. Schaal Alan R. Templeton Population Genetics and Phylogenetic Context of Weed Evolution in the Genus Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae) by Katherine Elinor Waselkov A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2013 St. Louis, Missouri © Copyright 2013 by Katherine Elinor Waselkov.
    [Show full text]
  • Dune Ecology: Beaches and Primary Dunes
    Dune Ecology: Beaches and Primary Dunes Dunes are dynamic and constantly changing ecosystems plays a key role in mediating many of the ecosystems that form a natural buffer between sea and functions of dunes, including their growth and land. Depending on conditions, they can either stabilization. Similarly, the physical environment of accumulate sand from the beach, growing the dunes this unique habitat strongly shapes the ecology of the and storing sand, or they can form a source of sand to organisms living there. the beach as the dunes erode. e ecology of these Lower Beach and Wrack Line In the lower portion of the beach where sediments are (the base of what is known as the supratidal zone ), the covered frequently by water, aquatic organisms thrive. strand or wrack line forms a small oasis of life in the However, in the areas at and just above the high tide otherwise dry and relatively barren sand. Here in the zone, conditions are particularly harsh. e lack of wrack line, the debris left by the high tide forms a water makes life nearly impossible for aquatic or narrow band along the shore. As many a beachcomber terrestrial organisms, and the dry sand is easy to heat will testify, all kinds of items can be found here, from and cool, resulting in strong swings in temperature human garbage to seashells, animal remains, from too hot to walk on during a sunny summer day decomposing seaweed, sea grasses, and other natural to bitterly cold during winter. e sand in this area is materials. e rich organic content of this area moved by both wind and waves, creating a highly provides a reservoir of water and food for the animals dynamic system in which the sand is in near constant found in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund Projects Catalog 2012
    CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION FUND PROJECTS CATALOG 2012 CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION FUND SUPPORTING ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND RESTORATION PROJECTS FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PROJECTS CATALOG 2012 PROJECTS CATALOG 2012 Issue I The Division of Legislative Services of the Virginia General Assembly publishes this catalogue. The information contained in these pages is current as of May 2012. Thank you to all of our partners and to all grantees of the Foundation who have provided text and materials for this catalogue. This catalogue was developed for all agencies, organizations, and individuals interested in environmental education and restoration projects on the bay and its rivers. General Assembly Division of Legislative Services Compiled and Edited by Theresa Schmid Research Associate iv TABLE OF CONTENTS I. CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION FUND HISTORY II. CHESAPEAKE BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE III. SUMMARY OF CBRF ACTIVITIES IV. APPLYING FOR A GRANT A. CRITERIA B. APPLICATION PROCEDURES GRANT ACTIVITIES FROM 2000-2012 V. GRANT PROJECTS LIST A. 2000 INDEX B. 2001 INDEX C. 2002 INDEX D. 2003 INDEX E. 2004 INDEX F. 2005 INDEX G. 2006 INDEX H. 2007 INDEX I. 2008 INDEX J. 2009 INDEX K. 2010 INDEX L. 2011 INDEX M. 2012 INDEX VI. ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PROJECTS A. SCHOOLS B. ORGANIZATIONS - EDUCATIONAL FOR: 1. YOUTH 2. COMMUNITY v VII. RESTORATION/CONSERVATION PROJECTS A. MONITORING B. EASEMENTS VIII. FINANCIAL SUMMARIES IX. INDEX vi I. HISTORY In 1992, the Virginia General Assembly enacted legislation, co-patroned by Senator Frederick Quayle and Delegate Harvey Morgan, which established the Chesapeake Bay preservation license plate. The design included drawings of bay grass, oysters and crabs, and read “Friends of the Chesapeake." The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) began issuing the specialty plates in December 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Species Fact Sheet
    HOW YOU CAN HELP INVASIVE SPECIES FACT SHEET Currently, an effort is being made by Mississippi State University, in cooperation with the South Carolina/North Carolina Beach Task Force, to determine the distribution of beach vitex in the Southeast and Mid-South. This infor- Beach vitex (Vitex Rotundifolia L.f.) mation which is being maintained in online databases by Mississippi State University (www.gri.msstate.edu) and Description, Distribution, and Management the South Carolina Beach Vitex Task Force (http://www.beachvitex.org), is very important in developing appropriate Victor Maddox, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Associate, Mississippi State University John D. Byrd, Jr., Ph.D., Extension/Research Professor, Mississippi State University strategies for addressing the plant. Please send reports of suspected beach vitex populations, including GPS coor- Randy Westbrooks, Ph. D., Invasive Species Specialist, U.S. Geological Survey dinates, site description / ownership, and photo images to: Victor Maddox, GeoResources Institute, Box 9555, Mis- Betsy Brabson, Ph. D., South Carolina Beach Vitex Task Force sissippi State, MS 39762-9652, Ph. 662-325-2123, E-mail: [email protected]; or to Betsy Brabson, South GRI Publication #5020 Carolina Beach Vitex Task Force, Georgetown, SC, Ph. 843-546-9531; E-mail: [email protected]. There are other ways to help with this effort, as well: INTRODUCTION Beach vitex (Vitex rotundifolia L.f.) is a deciduous woody • Do not plant beach vitex. Use native species such as sea oats. vine that was introduced to the Southeastern U.S. from • Remove beach vitex seedlings from public beach areas. Korea in the mid-1980s. Prior to its intoduction to the • Contact the GeoResources Institute for advice on removal of mature beach vitex colonies, and replacement with South Atlantic coast of the U.S., beach vitex had no native plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea-Beach Amaranth Amaranthus Pumilus Rafinesque
    Endangered Plants of New Jersey Fact Sheet Sea-beach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Rafinesque Summary Sea-beach amaranth is an annual plant of the Amaranth family (Amaranthaceae) that exhibits low sprawling growth and small spinach-like leaves, and is restricted to open sandy portions of ocean beaches between the high tide line and the toe of the primary dune. It was first collected in the early Nineteenth Century in New Jersey, and its range was subsequently determined to extend from Massachusetts to South Carolina. Although originally described as abundant, the number of populations of A. pumilus declined precipitously throughout the Twentieth Century and, following a collection from Ocean County in 1913, vanished from the flora of New Jersey. Habitat destruction and alteration, incompatible beach grooming practices and recreational activities have all contributed to the decline of this species. By 1989, the species was restricted to a few populations in North and South Carolina. In 1991 New Jersey included A. pumilus in its first official Endangered Plant Species List, and in 1993 the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, determined A. pumilus to be a federally threatened species under the authority of the Endangered Species Act. In 2000 the plant returned to newly created beaches in Monmouth County and adjacent habitat in Sandy Hook. Intensive surveys performed in 2001 revealed populations or individuals in all four coastal New Jersey counties. Despite its reappearance, the plant remains highly vulnerable to the uses and practices that caused its extirpation throughout most of the previous Century. Description following dispersal. Individuals are occasionally found on back dunes, exposed shoals, dune blowouts and bayside An annual plant that exhibits low, relatively prostrate strands, although these occurrences tend to be small and growth with fleshy, rounded, dark green leaves (1-2 cm temporary.
    [Show full text]