Indonesia's Pertamina to Sign Agreement with Petronas 19:04, August 06, 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Indonesia's Pertamina to sign agreement with Petronas 19:04, August 06, 2007 Indonesia's state-owned oil and gas company Pertamina will likely sign a joint venture agreement with its Malaysian and Vietnamese counterparts later this month to jointly explore and develop hydrocarbon resources, local press said Monday. Pertamina and Malaysia's Petronas and PetroVietnam recently have finalized negotiations on joint exploration in Randu Gunting block in East Java, which is estimated to contain 600 million barrels of oil and 1.7 trillion cubic feet of gas, reported English daily The Jakarta Post. The three parties will establish a joint venture company, called the PCPP Joint Operating Company, to operate the block, it said. Pertamina will have a 40 percent interest in the joint venture firm, while Petronas and PetroVietnam hold a 30 percent stake each, it said, quoting Pertamina president director Ari Sumarno. In early 2002, Pertamina, Petronas and PetroVietnam signed a Tripartite Cooperation Arrangement to jointly explore oil and gas in their respective countries as part of an economic cooperation under the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations. As part of the tripartite deals, the three companies had agreed to jointly develop oil blocks in Malaysia and Vietnam. An agreement signed in 2002 set up the development of Block 10 and 11.1 in offshore Vietnam and in June 2003, they signed another agreement to develop hydrocarbon resources in Block SK305 in offshore Sarawak, Malaysia and the Randu block in Indonesia. The negotiation to carry out a joint exploration in Indonesia had been stalled because of the Malaysian and Vietnamese companies ' opposition to the production sharing scheme (PSC) applied by Indonesia. The Indonesian government wants to apply its regular split of 85 percent and 15 percent in favor of the government in the development of the Randu Gunting block. This policy has been opposed by PetroVietnam and Petronas because the PSC scheme applied in their ventures in Malaysia and Vietnam would allow them to get 40 percent of the oil production. According to a source, both Petronas and PetroVietnam have agreed to the 85-15 production split scheme, and the deal is expected to be signed later this month. "Source: Xinhua" .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

2012 Confirmed Participants List Speaker Names in Bold
2012 Confirmed Participants List Speaker names in bold ALMENDRAS, Jose Rene –Department of DANG, Dinh Quy – Diplomatic Academy of Energy, Philippines Vietnam, Vietnam ANDITYA, Chrisnawan – Ministry of Energy and DAO, Minh Hien – Electricity Regulatory Mineral Resources, Indonesia Authority of Vietnam (ERAV), Vietnam ANDREOZZI, Marco – Pegaso Canton Ltd., China DAO, Trong Tu – Centre for Sustainable Water ANGELL, Ian – Talisman Energy, Malaysia Resources Development and Adaptation to AU, Tuan Minh – Asian Development Bank, Climate Change, Vietnam Vietnam DINH, Tien Hoa – Vietnam National Coal and BERKOBEN, Russell – ExxonMobil Exploration Mineral Industries Holding Corporation, Ltd. and Production, Vietnam (Vinacomin), Vietnam BICKEL, Dustin – Embassy of the United States, DO, Dinh Khang – Vietnam Academy of Science Laos and Technology (VAST); Company for BLAIR, Dennis – The National Bureau of Asian Improvement of Technology (IMTECH), Vietnam Research Board of Directors, United States DO, Tuan Manh – Sectoral Economic BLAND, Ben – Financial Times, Indonesia Department, Government Office of Vietnam, BOUNSOU, Xayphone – Ministry of Energy and Vietnam Mines, Laos DUONG, Ngoc Doan – Institute of Energy, BREBER, Pierre – Chevron, United States Vietnam BUENO, Edith – National Electrification EBINGER, Charles – Brookings Institution, Administration, Philippines United States BURKE, Fred – Baker & McKenzie, Vietnam FIELDS, Adam – Embassy of the United States, CHATSIS, Deborah – Embassy of Canada, Vietnam Vietnam FOOTE,
[Show full text]
Algeria Upstream OG Report.Pub
ALGERIA UPSTREAM OIL & GAS REPORT Completed by: M. Smith, Sr. Commercial Officer, K. Achab, Sr. Commercial Specialist, and B. Olinger, Research Assistant Introduction Regulatory Environment Current Market Trends Technical Barriers to Trade and More Competitive Landscape Upcoming Events Best Prospects for U.S. Exporters Industry Resources Introduction Oil and gas have long been the backbone of the Algerian economy thanks to its vast oil and gas reserves, favorable geology, and new opportunities for both conventional and unconventional discovery/production. Unfortunately, the collapse in oil prices beginning in 2014 and the transition to spot market pricing for natural gas over the last three years revealed the weaknesses of this economic model. Because Algeria has not meaningfully diversified its economy since 2014, oil and gas production is even more essential than ever before to the government’s revenue base and political stability. Today’s conjoined global health and economic crises, coupled with persistent declining production levels, have therefore placed Algeria’s oil and gas industry, and the country, at a critical juncture where it requires ample foreign investment and effective technology transfer. One path to the future includes undertaking new oil and gas projects in partnership with international companies (large and small) to revitalize production. The other path, marked by inertia and institutional resistance to change, leads to oil and gas production levels in ten years that will be half of today's production levels. After two decades of autocracy, Algeria’s recent passage of a New Hydrocarbons Law seems to indicate that the country may choose the path of partnership by profoundly changing its tax and investment laws in the hydrocarbons sector to re-attract international oil companies.
[Show full text]
Form 20-F 2011 UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C
Form 20-F 2011 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Form 20-F/A (Amendment No. 1) (Mark One) ‘ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR Í ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 OR ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to OR ‘ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report Commission file number: 1-10888 TOTAL S.A. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Republic of France (Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 2, place Jean Millier La Défense 6 92400 Courbevoie France (Address of Principal Executive Offices) Patrick de La Chevardière Chief Financial Officer TOTAL S.A. 2, place Jean Millier La Défense 6 92400 Courbevoie France Tel: +33 (0)1 47 44 45 46 Fax: +33 (0)1 47 44 49 44 (Name, Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act. Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Shares New York Stock Exchange* American Depositary Shares New York Stock Exchange * Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
[Show full text]
2016 EITI Report
Contents List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................6 Executive Summary........................................................................................................................8 1. EITI in Iraq .............................................................................................................................. 14 1.1. About the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) ................................... 14 1.2. EITI Implementation in Iraq .................................................................................................. 14 1.3. EITI Governance and leadership in Iraq (Requirement 1.1 – 1.3) ................................ 16 1.4. MSG Governance (Requirement 1.4) .................................................................................. 17 1.5. MSG Workplan (Requirement 1.5) ....................................................................................... 18 2. Legal Framework and Fiscal Regime for the Extractive Industries (Requirement 2.1) . 20 2.1. National Governance Structures ......................................................................................... 20 2.2. Overview of the regulations applicable to extractive industries ................................. 21 2.2.1. Extractive sector regulations in federal Iraq ........................................................................ 21 2.2.2. Overview of the corporate income tax and withholding tax regimes applicable
[Show full text]
Recent Crude Oil Price Dynamics, PETRONAS and Malaysia
Recent crude oil price dynamics, PETRONAS and Malaysia Lim Kim-Hwa [email protected] Tim Niklas Schoepp [email protected] 23 January 2015 Executive Summary Since PETRONAS contributed RM73.4 billion (30% of the Malaysian government’s expenditure) in 2013, the recent crude oil price fall has profound implications. The commodity effect will mean lower revenue and profits. However, this effect is cushioned by the depreciating USDMYR. This report aims to evaluate the likely price range of crude oil in 2015 and shows the possible impact on PETRONAS under different circumstances. With contained geo-political risks, global crude oil oversupply, slower global economic growth and cost factors that favour continuous production rather than cuts, crude oil is likely to trade between USD40 – 70 per barrel. Using the Annual Reports of PETRONAS, we estimated that: • If USDMYR depreciates slightly to 3.75 and crude oil trades at USD55 per barrel in 2015, PETRONAS’ profitability (as measured EBITDA) might fall to RM72 billion; and dividends might fall to RM19 billion (vs. RM123 billion and RM27 billion respectively in 2013); • In a rosy case (where crude oil trades at USD70 per barrel and USDMYR trades at 4), PETRONAS’ EBITDA would fall to RM98 billion but RM26 billion dividends payment might be possible; • In a bad case (where crude oil trades at USD40 per barrel and USDMYR trades at 3.5), PETRONAS’ EBITDA would fall to RM49 billion and dividends might fall by half to RM13 billion. • Some PETRONAS assets might be impaired, in particular those that were purchased when crude oil price was trading at over USD100 per barrel.
[Show full text]
Structuring Petroleum-Sector Institutions
Briefing October 2014 Considerations for Indonesia’s Universitas New Government: Structuring Gadjah Mada Petroleum-Sector Institutions Patrick Heller and Poppy Ismalina As Indonesia’s new government seeks to maximize the country’s benefits from the petroleum sector, one of its most important tasks will be to resolve the longstanding uncertainty surrounding the roles and responsibilities of the public institutions responsible for managing the sector. This briefing offers a perspective based on global experience in oil and gas as well as Indonesia’s own history. WHY PETROLEUM-SECTOR INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE MATTERS Effectively allocating roles and responsibilities among ministries, Pertamina, and other government agencies is crucial if Indonesia is to tackle the challenge of reinvigorating its petroleum sector. Indonesia faces declining petroleum reserves and production, rising consumption, costly fuel subsidies and a desire to boost the performance of Pertamina. The country therefore requires an institutional structure that will enable it to execute a coherent strategy and that empowers the assigned entities to manage exploration, production, relationships with contractors, tax collection and the enforcement of Indonesia’s laws and contracts. Most importantly, the government must decide whether to house regulatory (i.e., monitoring and oversight) responsibilities within Pertamina or in another body. The new government has an opportunity to reconcile the Constitutional Court’s decision on BP Migas and build a coherent, effective, forward-looking structure. In the aftermath of the 2012 Constitutional Court decision—which invalidated the role of independent regulator BP Migas as established in 2001 on the grounds that it did not meet the state’s responsibilities under Article 33 of the constitution—there has been confusion about the present and the future of government responsibility for the petroleum sector.
[Show full text]
Murphy-Oil-Corp-4Q-2020-Earnings
2020 FOURTH QUARTER EARNINGS CONFERENCE CALL & WEBCAST JANUARY 28, 2021 ROGER W. JENKINS PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER www.murphyoilcorp.com NYSE: MUR 0 Cautionary Statement & Investor Relations Contacts Cautionary Note to US Investors – The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires oil and natural gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose proved reserves that a company has demonstrated by actual production or conclusive formation tests to be economically and legally producible under existing economic and operating conditions. We may use certain terms in this presentation, such as “resource”, “gross resource”, “recoverable resource”, “net risked PMEAN resource”, “recoverable oil”, “resource base”, “EUR” or “estimated ultimate recovery” and similar terms that the SEC’s rules prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. The SEC permits the optional disclosure of probable and possible reserves in our filings with the SEC. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosures and risk factors in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and any subsequent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K that we file, available from the SEC’s website. Forward-Looking Statements – This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are generally identified through the inclusion of words such as “aim”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “drive”, “estimate”, “expect”, “expressed confidence”, “forecast”, “future”, “goal”, “guidance”, “intend”, “may”, “objective”, “outlook”, “plan”, “position”, “potential”, “project”, “seek”, “should”, “strategy”, “target”, “will” or variations of such words and other similar expressions.
[Show full text]
The Politics of Oil Nationalizations
University of California Los Angeles The Politics of Oil Nationalizations A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Paasha Mahdavi 2015 c Copyright by Paasha Mahdavi 2015 Abstract of the Dissertation The Politics of Oil Nationalizations by Paasha Mahdavi Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Michael L. Ross, Chair This dissertation is about the institutional choices governments make to man- age their petroleum wealth. It is about the determinants of these choices, but more importantly, their consequences for effective governance and how they ex- plain variations in political outcomes in oil-producing countries. I begin by de- scribing several different institutional pathways { involving national oil companies (NOCs) and their varying characteristics { that governments can take in extract- ing petroleum and regulating its production. My goal, then, is to show how these seemingly technical institutional choices can have profound impacts on gover- nance, ranging from effects on state revenue collection to incentives for corruption to ultimately the survival of the regime itself. To this aim, I collected original longitudinal data on the formation of NOCs in 62 countries since 1900; data from U.S. Department of Justice transcripts on the prosecution of corrupt practices in the energy sectors of 80 countries in the 2006-12 period; and existing cross-national data on government revenue capture from the sale of oil and natural resources. I analyze the determinants of NOC formation in the first empirical chapter, where I use Bayesian analysis informed with interview-based data from oil consultants to test and confirm leading theories of state revenue-maximization as the primary determinant of expropriation.
[Show full text]
Media Monitoring Online Pertamina Projects Stall Amid Policy
Media Monitoring Online Pertamina Projects Stall Amid Policy Flip-flops, Refinery Blaze Tanggal : Rabu , 31 Maret 2021 Media : The Jakarta Post Halaman : 2 Wartawan : Vincent Lingga Muatan Berita : Netral Narasumber : None () Rubrik : Headlines Topik : Kilang Minyak Nilai Iklan : Rp. 78.000.000 This is really bad news for energy, an extremely vital component of the economy. While Pertaminaâ€™s four refinery upgrade projects and two greenfield refinery projects launched in 2014 have been delayed by several years or even canceled, an inferno fire gutted the state-owned oil and gas giantâ€™s newest refinery at Balongan, West Java, early Monday morning. Even though Pertamina has made assurances that the incident would not disrupt fuel supply and distribution, we cannot help but be concerned about the damage incurred on the downstream oil industry. Already Southeast Asiaâ€™s largest net importer of crude oil, gasoline and gasoil at an annual volume of almost 1 million barrels per day (bpd), Indonesia may have to import more refined fuel until the Balongan refinery resumes production at its 125,000 bpd full capacity. Pertaminaâ€™s six old refineries, which have a combined capacity of 1 million bpd, are able to produce only 850,000 bpd of refined fuel, barely half of national demand. Importing more fuel means stronger pressures on the balance of payments and larger drain on the foreign exchange reserves. The Balongan refinery, which came on stream in 1994, was the last plant Pertamina built. Many new greenfield and expansion projects that have been planned since then have suffered cancellations or prolonged delays due to the countryâ€™s notorious policy flip-flops and bureaucratic barriers.
[Show full text]
PETRONAS Group Financial Results Announcement Q4 and Year Ended FY2017
PETRONAS Group Financial Results Announcement Q4 and Year Ended FY2017 © 2018 PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS) All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owner Cautionary Statement Forward-looking statements in this Financial Results Announcement presentation or in subsequent discussions with regards to this presentation involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these or other uncertainties or risks materialise, actual results may vary materially from those estimated, anticipated or projected. Specifically, but without limitation, capital costs could increase, projects could be delayed, and anticipated improvements in capacity, performance or profit levels might not be fully realised. Although PETRONAS believes that the expectations of its management as reflected by such forward- looking statements are reasonable based on information currently available to it, no assurances can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Accordingly, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. PETRONAS undertakes no obligation to update or revise any of them, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owner. PETRONAS makes no representation or warranty, whether express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the facts presented.
[Show full text]
Process Technologies and Projects for Biolpg
energies Review Process Technologies and Projects for BioLPG Eric Johnson Atlantic Consulting, 8136 Gattikon, Switzerland; [email protected]; Tel.: +41-44-772-1079 Received: 8 December 2018; Accepted: 9 January 2019; Published: 15 January 2019 Abstract: Liquified petroleum gas (LPG)—currently consumed at some 300 million tonnes per year—consists of propane, butane, or a mixture of the two. Most of the world’s LPG is fossil, but recently, BioLPG has been commercialized as well. This paper reviews all possible synthesis routes to BioLPG: conventional chemical processes, biological processes, advanced chemical processes, and other. Processes are described, and projects are documented as of early 2018. The paper was compiled through an extensive literature review and a series of interviews with participants and stakeholders. Only one process is already commercial: hydrotreatment of bio-oils. Another, fermentation of sugars, has reached demonstration scale. The process with the largest potential for volume is gaseous conversion and synthesis of two feedstocks, cellulosics or organic wastes. In most cases, BioLPG is produced as a byproduct, i.e., a minor output of a multi-product process. BioLPG’s proportion of output varies according to detailed process design: for example, the advanced chemical processes can produce BioLPG at anywhere from 0–10% of output. All these processes and projects will be of interest to researchers, developers and LPG producers/marketers. Keywords: Liquified petroleum gas (LPG); BioLPG; biofuels; process technologies; alternative fuels 1. Introduction Liquified petroleum gas (LPG) is a major fuel for heating and transport, with a current global market of around 300 million tonnes per year.
[Show full text]
Jtb Steps on the Indonesian
FEATURES JTB STEPS ON THE INDONESIAN GAS LATHAM & WATKINS, INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE SPONSOR AND THE BORROWER IN THE FINANCING OF THE JAMBARAN-TIUNG BIRU PROJECT, PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW OF THE DEAL AND INSIGHT INTO SOME OF ITS NOTABLE FEATURES. BY CLARINDA TJIA-DHARMADI, PARTNER, TIM G FOURTEAU, COUNSEL, AND MEREDITH STRIKE, ASSOCIATE. The Jambaran-Tiung Biru Project (JTB Project) is 315m standard cubic feet per day of raw among the largest upstream oil and gas projects gas, the designing and installing of gas to reach financial close in Indonesia in the past processing facilities with a maximum capacity decade, and marks several important milestones of 330m standard cubic feet per day and the for project financings in the region. development of gas flow lines from the wells The limited recourse project financing to the gas processing facilities and sales gas utilised a trustee borrowing structure (TBS) and pipelines from the gas processing facilities to is the first project financing in the region to the Gresik-Semarang pipeline. comprise conventional interest-bearing tranches PEPC and PT Pertamina EP (PEP), a wholly- with Islamic financing tranches. owned subsidiary of Pertamina, are sponsoring It is also the first limited recourse project the development of the JTB Project (though financing to feature a subsidiary of Indonesian PEP is not a party to the financing). PEPC will state-owned oil and gas company PT Pertamina operate and maintain the JTB Project, including (Persero) (Pertamina), namely PT Pertamina EP the gas fields, pipelines and gas processing Cepu (PEPC), as the anchoring sponsor. facilities. Containing extensive Indonesian participation PEPC and PEP own 92% and 8% of the unit throughout the structure, it is also the first oil interests in the unitised JTB field, respectively, and gas project financing in Indonesia to be and will share a proportionate amount of supported by an all domestic offtake, with no project revenues, capital costs and operating government support, solidifying the trend set expenditures.
[Show full text]