Anglo-American Defence Relations & the Government of Gordon Brown

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anglo-American Defence Relations & the Government of Gordon Brown Durham E-Theses Anglo-American Defence Relations and the Government of Gordon Brown GANNON, PHILIP,RICHARD How to cite: GANNON, PHILIP,RICHARD (2015) Anglo-American Defence Relations and the Government of Gordon Brown, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10986/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Anglo-American Defence Relations & The Government of Gordon Brown Philip R. Gannon 2014 Durham University, School of Government and International Affairs Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations. Acknowledgements and Dedications I would like to thank my supervisors, Professor John Dumbrell and Dr Christian Schweiger for all their help and support. I would also like to thank my father, Tony Gannon for his time proof reading this thesis. I dedicate this thesis to my wife Bori Gannon for all of the love and support she offered me during my research. Statement of Copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotations from it should be published without the author’s prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. 2 Abstract This thesis intends to promote two key original contributions to the field of International Relations. One element of this thesis is to engage the body of work on Anglo-American relations with a set of International Relations theories in order to develop the understandings of the concept of the Special Relationship. By using the work of Alliance Theory and the English School’s notion of International Society, this thesis presents a lucid model for analysing Britain and America’s security partnerships. With this model in place, this thesis explores one of the most recent periods of the relationship by investigating the government of Gordon Brown. This thesis uses this International Relations theoretical approach to explore Anglo-American relations in the Brown period by investigating the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. These conflicts were representative of the UK-US partnership and went through significant developments in the period between 2007 and 2010. In the case of Iraq, the Brown period saw the end of British combat operations and responsibility for parts of the country being handed back to the Iraqis. While these developments took place, attention returned to the war in Afghanistan and this period saw the emergence of serious problems in the conduct of the war. In this thesis, both of these conflicts are inspected by examining corresponding themes to demonstrate the working relationship between Britain and America. Equipment matters, troop power, military strategy and alliance relations are the four main grounds in which the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are investigated to determine the success of the Anglo-American partnership under Gordon Brown. The findings of this thesis suggest that the Brown period saw the beginning of the deconstruction of the UK-US alliance as the goals of the alliance had failed to be achieved. Largely due to the British military’s inability to conduct both wars simultaneously to the standard needed for success, her credibility as a reliable partner to the US was diminished. Brown himself was criticised for limiting the capabilities of the armed forces to operate effectively. However, Brown remained a strong supporter of the US in the War on Terror and did aim to provide important contributions to the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite the failings of the alliance the theoretical approach to understanding the Special Relationship has proven to be an effective way to examine the nature of British and American interaction. 3 Table of Contents Abbreviations 7 List of Illustrations 7 Maps 8 1. Introduction 9 1.1. Research Aims 9 1.2. Research Questions 12 1.3. Thesis Structure 12 Part I 2. Methodology 16 2.1 Qualitative Research 16 2.2 List of Sources 17 3. The Special Relationship: Literature Review 23 3.1. Historical Origins 24 3.1.1 Co-operation or Competition? 24 3.2. Special Relationship Concepts 27 3.2.1. Hands-across-the-sea 27 3.2.2. Greeks and Romans 28 3.2.3. Atlantic Bridge 29 3.2.4. Poodleism 30 3.2.5. Lazarus 31 3.3. Construction 32 3.3.1. Interest or Sentiment 32 3.3.2. Middle Ground 34 3.4. Historiographical Schools 34 3.4.1. Evangelical 35 3.4.2. Functional 36 3.4.3. Terminal 36 3.5. Future Discourse 37 3.6. Remarks on Anglo-American literature 39 4. Contemporary British Foreign Policy 41 4.1. America and Europe 41 4.2. British Foreign Policy and International Relations Theory 43 5. Contemporary US Foreign Policy 46 5.1. Unilateralism vs. Multilateralism 46 5.2. Transatlantic Drift 48 5.3. Neo-conservatism 50 5.4. Bush to Obama 52 5.5. US Hegemony 53 6. Literature review highlights 56 7. The English School and International Society 57 7.1. Members of the English School 57 7.1.1. Hedley Bull 58 7.1.2. Alan James 61 7.1.3. Tim Dunne 63 7.1.4. Barry Buzan 65 4 7.2. International Society and the Special Relationship 67 8. Alliance Theory 69 8.1. Alliance Formation 69 8.2. Alliance Disintegration 72 8.3. Alliance Theory and the Special Relationship 73 9. The Special Relationship Alliance Theory 75 9.1. The Special Relationship or Anglo-American Affairs? 75 9.2. The Special Relationship Alliance in International Society 78 9.3. The Special Relationship Alliances and Alliance Theory 79 9.4. Aims, Objectives and Scope of the SRA 81 9.4.1. Elements of the SRA 82 9.4.1.1. Norms 83 9.4.1.2. Roles 84 9.4.1.3. Goals 85 9.5. Thesis Contribution 87 9.6. Limitations of SRA approach 88 Part II 10. Special Relationship Alliance III: Part I 91 10.1. Tony Blair in the Academic Literature 91 10.1.1. Debate I: Blair and Foreign Policy 92 10.1.2. Debate II: Blair’s Motivations 94 10.1.3. Debate III: The Academic View of Blair 96 10.2. Blair and America 98 10.3. The Formation of SRA III 99 10.3.1. 9/11: ‘Shoulder to shoulder’ 100 10.3.2. The War on Terror 102 10.3.3. Axis of Evil 105 10.3.4. The Crawford Meeting 107 10.4. SRA III 112 10.4.1. Norms and Roles 112 10.4.2. Goals 116 11. Gordon Brown: Prime Minister 122 11.1. Gordon Brown in the Academic Literature 122 11.1.1. Debate I: Brown and Foreign Policy 123 11.1.2. Debate II: Blair’s Legacy and Brown’s Leadership 126 11.1.3. Debate III: The Academic View of Brown 128 11.2. Brown as Chancellor 129 11.2.1. Defence Spending 129 11.2.2. Iraq Decision 132 11.2.3. Brown, Blair and the US 135 11.3. Brown as Prime Minister 137 11.3.1. Style and Ability 137 11.3.2. Appointments 141 11.3.3. Foreign and Security Policy 143 11.4. SRA III: 2007-2010 145 11.4.1. The British Government’s Views 146 11.4.2. The American Government’s Views 148 11.4.3. Parliamentary and Congressional Views 150 5 12. Special Relationship Alliance III: Part II – Iraq 2007-2009 152 12.1. Background 153 12.1.1. UK and US deployment – 2003 154 12.1.2. Operation Sinbad and the loss of Basra Palace 154 12.2. Equipment 154 12.2.1. British Funding and Equipment Issues 155 12.2.2. British Reliance on the US 158 12.3. Troop Power 159 12.3.1. Troop Levels 160 12.3.2. Troop Compatibility 163 12.4. Strategy 165 12.4.1. Surge 166 12.4.2. Force Commitment 169 12.4.2.1. Reduction 170 12.4.2.2. Withdrawal 172 12.4.3. Strategic Harmony 175 12.5. Alliance Relations 176 12.5.1. Reliable Ally 176 12.5.2. Unreliable Ally 178 12.6. Iraq and SRA III 179 13. Special Relationship Alliance III: Part III – Afghanistan 2007-2010 182 13.1. Background 181 13.1.1. Initial Invasion 181 13.1.2. British Deployment to Helmand 181 13.2. Equipment 182 13.2.1. Equipment Problems 182 13.2.2. Helicopters 188 13.3. Troop Power 192 13.3.1. Troop Levels 192 13.3.2. Other Troop Issues 195 13.4. Strategy 198 13.4.1. Overwatch/Engagement with Locals 198 13.4.2. Troop Surge 202 13.4.3. Pakistan 206 13.5. Alliance Relations 211 13.5.1. Burden-Sharing 211 13.5.2. UK-US Alliance Relations 215 13.6. Afghanistan and SRA III 218 14. Conclusion 220 14.1. Summary of Part I 221 14.2. Summary of Part II 223 14.3. Concluding analysis 223 14.4.
Recommended publications
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte
    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Airstrike Magnifies Political Divide Over the War in Afghanistan
    Nxxx,2009-09-05,A,009,Bs-BW,E3 THE NEW YORK TIMES INTERNATIONAL SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2009 ØØN A9 NATO Airstrike Magnifies Political Divide Over the War in Afghanistan governor of Ali Abad, Hajji Habi- From Page A1 bullah, said the area was con- with the Afghan people.” trolled by Taliban commanders. Two 14-year-old boys and one The Kunduz area was once 10-year-old boy were admitted to calm, but much of it has recently the regional hospital here in Kun- slipped under the control of in- duz, along with a 16-year-old who surgents at a time when the Oba- later died. Mahboubullah Sayedi, ma administration has sent thou- a spokesman for the Kunduz pro- sands of more troops to other vincial governor, said most of the parts of the country to combat an estimated 90 dead were militants, insurgency that continues to gain judging by the number of charred strength in many areas. pieces of Kalashnikov rifles The region is patrolled mainly found. But he said civilians were by NATO’s 4,000-member Ger- also killed. man force, which is barred by In explaining the civilian German leaders from operating deaths, military officials specu- in combat zones farther south. lated that local people were con- The United States has 68,000 scripted by the Taliban to unload troops in Afghanistan, more than the fuel from the tankers, which any other nation; other countries were stuck near a river several fighting under the NATO com- miles from the nearest villages. mand have a combined total of about 40,000 troops here.
    [Show full text]
  • Gordon Brown (James Gordonbrown) Julio 07, Primer Ministro
    Gordon Brown (James GordonBrown) julio 07, Primer Ministro Duración del mandato: 27 de Junio de 2007 - de de Nacimiento: Giffnock, concejo de East Renfrewshire, Escocia, 20 de Febrero de 1951 Partido político: Laborista Profesión : Profesor de Historia y periodista ResumenLos diez años de Gobierno de Tony Blair en el Reino Unido tocaron a su fin en junio de 2007 con la entrega del puesto de primer ministro, días después de hacerlo con el liderazgo del Partido Laborista, a Gordon Brown, su poderoso canciller del Exchequer (ministro de Hacienda) desde las triunfales elecciones de 1997 y con quien venía manteniendo una singular relación de amistad y rivalidad. Artífice de una fructífera política económica de tipo social-liberal, aunque con algún acento socialdemócrata, y reacio al euro, en 2006 obligó a un Blair muy desgastado por la guerra de Irak a aceptar la renuncia en su favor en mitad de la tercera legislatura, realizando así una antigua ambición que su baqueteado superior intentó demorar todo cuanto pudo. Brown advoca un neolaborismo progresista y actualizado con "nuevas ideas"y "nuevas prioridades", a la cabeza de las cuales están las inversiones públicas en educación y sanidad.(Texto actualizado hasta julio 2007) http://www.cidob.org 1 of 12 Biografía 1. Estudiante aventajado de Historia y primeras actividades en el Partido Laborista 2. Progresión en los Comunes y coadjutor de Tony Blair 3. Una década como ministro de Hacienda del Reino Unido 4. Ambición sucesoria y presiones al primer ministro 5. Un relevo en el poder acordado con antelación 6. El mandato del premier: entre los embates económicos y los sondeos adversos 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF on Watching the Watchmen
    REPORT Watching the Watchmen The Growing Case for Recall Elections and Increased Accountability for MPs Sam Goodman About the Author Sam Goodman is the author of the Imperial Premiership: The Role of the Modern Prime Minister in Foreign Policy Making, 1964-2015 (Manchester University Press: 2015). He is currently working as a political adviser to Peter Dowd MP the current Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury and has previously worked for a variety of Labour Members of Parliament including: Julie Cooper MP, Sir Mark Hendrick MP, Michael Dugher MP, and Rt. Hon Jack Straw MP. Watching the Watchmen: The Growing Case for Recall Elections and Increased Accountability for MPs Members of the House of Commons have long flirted parliamentary conventions and much procedure with the idea of British exceptionalism—citing the is arcane, which makes it difficult even for the UK’s role as the ‘mother of all parliaments’, its most ardent politically engaged citizen to follow unwritten constitution, its unitary voting system, proceedings and debates in the House of Commons. and the principle of the sovereignty of Parliament This separation between the governors and over the people—as a bulwark against the instability governed is exacerbated further by the limited customarily found in other western democracies. avenues available to the public to hold those elected In modern times, this argument held water as to account, which is exemplified by recent political it delivered stable parliamentary majorities, scandals, including allegations of bullying and peaceful transfers of power between governments, sexual harassment in the House of Commons. At the and kept in check the ideological fringes of both time of writing this report, no MP has been forced major political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 501 19 November 2009 No. 2 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 19 November 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 127 19 NOVEMBER 2009 Business of the House 128 we at business questions are the flint she sparks off, we House of Commons share in her reflected glory. May we assume that she is now a subscriber to that publication? Thursday 19 November 2009 May we have a statement on the prospects for the Bills in the Queen’s Speech? On Monday, the right hon. and learned Lady claimed that the majority of the Bills The House met at half-past Ten o’clock in the Queen’s Speech would become law before the next election. We have an absolute maximum of 70 sitting PRAYERS days before Dissolution, and we need to set aside time for debates on the pre-Budget report, as well as ensuring that we have time to discuss other issues, such as [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] Afghanistan. Given all that, does the right hon. and learned Lady still stand by her original claim, or will Business of the House she admit that there may be difficulties in fulfilling the Government’s commitments? Given the limited time we 10.33 am have left, recess dates have an added significance, so is the right hon.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Codifying Ethics
    1 2 5 Codifying ethics 3 4 New Labour and the government of 5 6 civil servants 7 8 Edward Barratt 9 10 11 12 13 Introduction 14 In the early months of his Prime Ministership in 2007, Gordon Brown spoke of a 15 new era of government, of restoring trust in government that would lead to 16 democratic renewal, the nurturing of citizenship and effective government 17 (Brown, 2010). Against a background of declining levels of political participa- 18 19 tion and the need to respond to an array of challenges now confronting the 20 nation, from the threat of terrorism to the global economy, the rights and 21 responsibilities of British citizens were now in need of redefinition. Amongst the 22 issues at stake for Brown were the powers of an overpowerful executive, includ- 23 ing those executive powers that compromised the independence, neutrality and 24 impartiality of the Civil Service. Brown spoke of reviving the aims of the Civil 25 Service reformers of the mid-nineteenth century, seemingly intimating new pri- 26 orities beyond the dominant themes of the Blair era: “business like,” “joined up,” 27 “decentralised,” “consumer responsive” and “network and partnership” based 28 administration. There was a need for an Act of Parliament, Brown argued, that 29 would formalize the legal status of the Civil Service and the Civil Service Com- 30 mission and promote the proper conduct of government and the good conscience 31 of public officials. A particular way of governing civil servants was to serve 32 wider governmental objectives, helping to renew politics and society.
    [Show full text]
  • Money in the Great Recession BUCKINGHAM STUDIES in MONEY, BANKING and CENTRAL BA.NKING
    Money in the Great Recession BUCKINGHAM STUDIES IN MONEY, BANKING AND CENTRAL BA.NKING Seri Editor: Tim Congdon CBE, Chairman, Ins1itute of [nternalional Jlonewry R.:search and Professo1~ University of Buckingham, Uniled Kingdom The Institute of International Monetary Research promotes research into how Money in the Great dc:\'elopments in banking and finance affect the wider economy. Particular attention is paid to the effect of changes in the quantity of money, on inflation and detlation, and on boom and bust. The Institute's wider aims are to enhance economic kno\\'ledge and understanding, and to seek price stability, steady Recession economic growth and high employment. The Institute is located at the University of Buckingham and helps with the university's educational role. Buckingham Studies in Money, Banking and Central Banking presents some Did a Crash in Money Growth Cause the of the Instilllte·s most important work. Contributions from scholars at other Global Slun1p? universities and research bodies. and practi tioners in finance and banking. are also welcome. for more on the Institute. see the \\·ebsit.: at www.m\·-pr.org, Edited by Tim Congdon CBE Chairman, Institute of Internatio11al 1V oneta1y R esearch and Profess01; University of Buckingham, United Kingdom BUCKINGHAM STUDIES IN MONEY, BANKING AND CENTRAL BANKING IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS ~Edward Elgar ~ PUBL I SH I NG Cheltenham, UK• Northampton, MA, USA ';;' Tim Congdon 2017 Contents :-\II rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored 1n a retrieval S~ ' Stem or transmitted in anv form orb\' an\' means electronic mechanical o: photoco_pying, recording.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 494 24 June 2009 No. 98 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 24 June 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; Tel: 0044 (0) 208876344; e-mail: [email protected] 777 24 JUNE 2009 778 rightly made the case. I hope she will understand when I House of Commons point her to the work of the World Bank and other international financial institutions on infrastructure in Wednesday 24 June 2009 Ukraine and other countries. We will continue to watch the regional economic needs of Ukraine through our involvement with those institutions. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Mr. Gary Streeter (South-West Devon) (Con): Given PRAYERS the strategic significance of Ukraine as a political buffer zone between the EU and Russia, does the Minister not think that it was perhaps an error of judgment to close [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] the DFID programme in Ukraine last year? It would be an utter tragedy if Ukraine’s democracy should fail, so BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS should we not at the very least be running significant capacity-building programmes to support it? SPOLIATION ADVISORY PANEL Resolved, Mr. Thomas: We are running capacity-building programmes on democracy and good governance through That an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That she will be graciously pleased to give directions that there be laid the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Party Conferences Programme 2010
    PARTY CONFERENCES PROGRAMME 2010 Liberal Democrat Party Conference 19—21 September p.! Labour Party Conference 26—29 September p." Conservative Party Conference 3—6 October p.# Liberal Democrat Party Conference ! SUNDAY 19 SEPTEMBER 13.00—14.00 / Suite 8 / Jury’s Inn Child-friendly communities: Tackling child poverty at the local level Sarah Teather MP; Anita Tiessen, UNICEF UK; David Powell, Dorset County Council; A young person involved with Child Friendly Communities; Decca Aitkenhead, The Guardian (Chair) 18.15—19.30 / Suite 6 / Jury’s Inn !e Demos Grill: An in-conversation Vince Cable MP, Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills; Danny Finkelstein, The Times 18.15—19.30 / ACC Liverpool / Hall 11C Public service reform in an age of cuts: Where next? Paul Burstow MP (invited); Ben Lucas, 2020 Public Services Trust (invited); Stephen Bubb, ACEVO; Roy O’Shaughnessy, CDG; Randeep Ramesh, The Guardian (Chair); MONDAY 20 SEPTEMBER 8.00—9.00 / Holiday Inn Express / Albert Dock / Britannia 1 Tackling Britain’s worklessness: How to get the Work Programme working Lord German; Jill Kirby, Centre for Policy Studies (invited); Mark Lovell, A4e; Allegra Stratton, The Guardian (Chair) By invitation only 8.00—9.30 / Hilton Liverpool / Meeting Room 6—7 Learning to Succeed: Building culture and ethos in challenging schools Duncan Hames MP; Daisy Christodoulou, Teach First; Professor Dylan Wiliam, Institute of Education, University of London; Chris Kirk, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP; Philip Collins, Demos (Chair) By invitation only 13.00—14.00 / Blue Bar / Albert Dock Tackling child poverty in an age of austerity Sarah Teather MP; Kate Stanley, ippr; Sally Copley, Save the Children; Philip Collins, Demos (Chair) Liberal Democrat Party Conference cont.
    [Show full text]
  • Banged up August 2008 for the Term ‘Banged REFORM Up’ in the Previous Three Months
    and by humanising both the young The media and reform: offenders and their adult mentors. Using LexisNexis, a search was made of UK newspapers on 14 the case of Banged Up August 2008 for the term ‘banged REFORM up’ in the previous three months. David Wilson discusses the reform potential This yielded 42 stories over 24 newspapers in which the programme of popular media, focusing on the TV series was mentioned. This mention might PENAL Banged Up. have been as brief as the programme being cited as evidence of Channel 5’s commitment to new programmes to over 2,000 words of interview ORING with David Blunkett. n my previous writing I have prisoner’s story and measuring their As might be expected the suggested that popular, progress within the series. The Rt majority of mentions were in TV EXPL Imainstream TV and fi lms about Hon David Blunkett MP, the former previews (20) and reviews (8) and prisons can serve a penal reform Home Secretary (2001-2004) was clearly the majority of other articles/ function through, for example, recruited to chair the parole board profiles had been sparked by the helping to set standards of decency hearings. Throughout the programme series or publicity for it. The setting for what is and what is not makers not only wanted to entertain of Scarborough’s former jail ensured acceptable practice in prison, and viewers with this piece of ‘reality some coverage by local papers (four representing prisoners as people in TV’, but also have the young mentions in Scarborough Evening an attempt to counter processes of prisoners experience what prison News) as did the participation of ex- depersonalisation and de- was like in the belief that this could offenders (Birmingham Evening humanisation (Wilson and change their future behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Reshuffle – 5 June 2009 8 June 2009
    Ministerial Reshuffle – 5 June 2009 8 June 2009 This note provides details of the Cabinet and Ministerial reshuffle carried out by the Prime Minister on 5 June following the resignation of a number of Cabinet members and other Ministers over the previous few days. In the new Cabinet, John Denham succeeds Hazel Blears as Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and John Healey becomes Housing Minister – attending Cabinet - following Margaret Beckett’s departure. Other key Cabinet positions with responsibility for issues affecting housing remain largely unchanged. Alistair Darling stays as Chancellor of the Exchequer and Lord Mandelson at Business with increased responsibilities, while Ed Miliband continues at the Department for Energy and Climate Change and Hilary Benn at Defra. Yvette Cooper has, however, moved to become the new Secretary of State for Work and Pensions with Liam Byrne becoming Chief Secretary to the Treasury. The Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills has been merged with BERR to create a new Department for Business, Innovation and Skills under Lord Mandelson. As an existing CLG Minister, John Healey will be familiar with a number of the issues affecting the industry. He has been involved with last year’s Planning Act, including discussions on the Community Infrastructure Levy, and changes to future arrangements for the adoption of Regional Spatial Strategies. HBF will be seeking an early meeting with the new Housing Minister. A full list of the new Cabinet and other changes is set out below. There may yet be further changes in junior ministerial positions and we will let you know of any that bear on matters of interest to the industry.
    [Show full text]