DOCSLIB.ORG

BJCT Issue 1/2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BJCT Issue 1/2020 B CT Berlin Journal of Critical Theory Volume 4, Number 1 (January, 2020) Desensitized genius: The actuality of Dialectic of Enlightenment Vjeran Katunarić Social Practices and the Constitution of Knowledge: Critical Social Theory as a Philosophy of Praxis Craig Browne Notes on Jean Baudrillard and Critical Theory Chris Horrocks Seeking a Xiaokang Society: Deng Xiaoping and the Reinter- pretation of the Confucian Tradition in Chinese Marxism Roland Boer Depression and Political Will Brian Price www.bjct.de enomoi Editors Amirhosein Khandizaji Wolfgang Sohst Editorial Board C. Fred Alford, University of David Held, Durham University. Maryland. Christopher Horrocks, Kingston Amy Allen, Pennsylvania State University London. University. David B. Ingram, Loyola University Andrew Arato, The New School. Chicago. Jay Bernstein, The New School. Martin Jay, University of California, David Berry, University of Sussex. Berkeley. Roland Boer, University of Newcastle. Hans-Herbert Koegler, University of Geoff Boucher, Deakin University. North Florida. Andrew Bowie, Royal Holloway Claudia Leeb, Washington State University of London. University. Stephen Eric Bronner, Rutgers Stephan Moebius, University of Graz. University. Jeffrey T. Nealon, Penn State Hauke Brunkhorst, University of University. Flensburg. William Outhwaite, Newcastle Ian Buchanan, University of University. Wollongong. Stefano Petrucciani, Sapienza Craig Calhoun, Berggruen Institute. University of Rome. Mary Caputi, California State Max Paddison, Durham University. University. Darrow Schecter, University of James J. Chriss, Cleveland State Sussex. University William Scheuerman, Indiana Deborah Cook, University of University Bloomington. Windsor. Simon Susen, City, University of Heiko Feldner, Cardiff University. London. Dino Franco Felluga, Purdue Fabio Vighi, Cardiff University. University. Thomas Wheatland, Assumption Alessandro Ferrara, University of College. Rome Tor Vergata. Richard Wolin, City University of Gary Genosko, University of Ontario. New York. Stefano Giacchetti, Loyola University Chicago. Graeme Gilloch, Lancaster University (former member). 3 Contents Desensitized genius: The actuality of Dialectic of Enlightenment 5 Vjeran Katunarić Social Practices and the Constitution of Knowledge: Critical Social Theory as a Philosophy of Praxis 37 Craig Browne Notes on Jean Baudrillard and Critical Theory 157 Chris Horrocks Seeking a Xiaokang Society: Deng Xiaoping and the Reinterpretation of the Confucian Tradition in Chinese Marxism 181 Roland Boer Depression and Political Will 211 Brian Price ISSN: 2567-4048 (print) / 2567-4056 (online) xenomoi Verlag, Heinersdorfer Str. 16, D-12209 Berlin Phone: ~49(30)755 11 712, Email: [email protected] 4 Berlin Journal of Critical Theory | Vol. 4, No. 1 (January, 2020) 5 Desensitized genius: The actuality of Dialectic of Enlightenment Vjeran Katunarić1 Abstract: Some important passages in modern political and cultural theory are given over to monsters – Hobbes to the Leviathan and the Behemoth, Neumann to the Behemoth, and Horkheimer and Adorno to Homer’s Sirens. However, in their Dialectic of Enlightenment the last two authors interpret the Sirens in a dif- ferent, and ultimately diffident, way. This essay re-examines their interpretation in light of the hermeneutic double dead-end of the Sirens’ songs pitted against Odysseus’s instrumentality and in light of the contemporary revival of a totali- tarian, anti-poetic worldview – a new Behemoth – in terms of a global capitalism fueled by a permanent state of war. I seek to revise the Weberian core of Horkheimer and Adorno’s concept of Enlightenment (disenchantment without empathy), but I still concur with their identification of Nazism as the peak of the long shadow of the Enlightenment. The following arguments are offered in support of this reinterpretation of the actuality of the Dialectic of Enlightenment. The first argument establishes the re- lationship between gynophobia and an aversion to peace. The second designates the development of the military Enlightenment as a premise for Nazism. The third argument outlines neo-totalitarian capitalism as the product of the collab- oration between Big Science and the advanced industrialism of a “genially stu- 1 Vjeran Katunarić was Professor of Sociology at the University of Zadar and is now retired as of October 2019. Currently he is guest lecturer at the same institution. From 1978 to 2010 he was assistant, associate and full professor on the Faculty of Philosophy in Zagreb. He was also a visiting professor at various universities in the USA and Sweden, then cultural policy expert, rap- porteur and consultant at the Council of Europe and an expert in intercul- tural dialogue at the European Commission. His titles published in English include the following: The Quest for a Liberal-Socialist Democracy and Devel- opment: Against the Behemoth (2018); Dancing and Calculating: Culturally Sus- tainable Development and Globalization in Light of Two Paradigms of Socio-Cul- tural Development (2014); Beyond ‘Doom and Gloom’ and ‘Saving the World’: On the Relevance of Sociology in the Civic Education (2009); Building Sociological Knowledge within and across Disciplinary Boundaries: Megalomania vs. Modesty? (2009); Toward the New Public Culture (2004); Global Perceptions of Cultural Pol- icy (2000); (ed., with B. Cvjetičanin) Cultural Policy in Croatia (1999); Masters and Servants: Critical Thought and the New Class (1999); and Global Embraces and Local Strongholds (1998). 6 Berlin Journal of Critical Theory | Vol. 4, No. 1 (January, 2020) pid” system, which may be compared to the absurdity of the idea of “intelligent design”. This system consists of the inventive design (of a given product) and a massive idiotizing of (re)productive work. Several examples are given to illus- trate this inherent contradiction. Finally, I reject Adorno’s pessimistic view regarding the possibility of the co- existence of a poetic world after Auschwitz, and propound a possible rehabili- tation of the fundamental value of human (re)productive work as the basis of a new poesis. In combination with the work of the arts, a re-evaluation of work (in terms of Marx’s postulate of “constant capital being man himself”) may provide the material basis for a renewed aesthetic Enlightenment anticipated by voices ranging from the mythical Sirens to Schiller’s Letters, as a universe in which the poetic form provides substance with true meaning. Introduction: Monsters, science, and art ome classic passages in modern political and cultural theory are Sgiven over to monsters. Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan represents characteristics of the modern bureaucratic state, while the Behemoth designates the will to wage permanent war. Franz Neumann took the Behemoth as a metaphor for Nazism. Horkheimer and Adorno, in their Dialectic of Enlightenment, dealt with a marvelous group of monsters, namely the Sirens. However, the authors doubt whether the Sirens are monsters at all and, accordingly, offer another interpretation which is, however, not devoid of ambiguities. On the one hand, they take the Sirens as representatives of the forces of nature, including sex drive, which Odysseus, who represents calculating rationality, deceives in a manner typical of the whole project of the Enlightenment. On the other hand, the authors recognize the aesthetic dimension of the Sirens’ song, due to which the relations between instrumental reason, nature, and the aesthetic reason remain partly inconsistent. This is the main subject of this paper, a point which deserves further discussion. In essence, I agree with the authors’ remark that cold rationality, as incorporated into modern science, constitutes the colonial mind of the Enlightenment. Yet, I disagree with the authors’ view that deceptive reason permeates human mentality and activities right from the beginning. Likewise, it remains unclear what is the proper role of the arts in the formation of human society and culture. Desensitized genius: The actuality of Dialectic of Enlightenment 7 My interpretation essentially maps onto Horkheimer and Adorno’s interpretation: from a hermeneutical understanding of the myth of Od- ysseus and the Sirens in an aesthetic key to their view of Nazism as a contemporary avatar of the archaic instrumental reason. In developing my argument, I will emphasize the role of the military Enlightenment and its merging with Big Science on the way to the present-day mili- tary-industrial complex. This line of argumentation concludes with an outline of the figure of the desensitized genius, as an enormous financial and military power with neo-Nazi predilections. To this extent, I agree with the implication of the authors of Dialectic of Enlightenment that democracy, as a political project of the Enlightenment, cannot develop on the basis of a half-hearted rationality. This is primar- ily so because the latter instigates fears of the liberating voices of peace coming from a feminine culture represented by the Sirens. In essence, I agree with the authors’ view of the Enlightenment as a project of developing a desensitized reason, although they refer to the concept of purposive rationality in terms of Weber’s ideal-type in a re- ductionistic way.2 Otherwise, instrumental rationality exists, indeed, in a reductive form mostly at the core of modern power, and is pitted against nature and humanity and even threatens total annihilation, for the first time in the evolution of life. In view of this outlook, one must revise the historical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Idealism and Realism in Western and Indian Philosophies
    IDEALISM AND REALISM IN WESTERN AND INDIAN PHILOSOPHIES —Dr. Sohan Raj Tater Over the centuries the philosophical attitude in the west has never been constant but undulated between Idealism and Realism. The difference between these two appears to be irreconcilable, being more or less bound up with the innate difference of predispositions and tendencies varying from person to person. The result is an uncompromising antagonism. The western scholars, who were brought up in the tradition of Kant and Hegel, and who studied Indian philosophies, were more sympathetic towards the Idealistic systems of India. In the 19 th century, there was a predominant wave of monism and scholars like Max Muller were naturally attracted towards the metaphysical views of Sankara etc. and the uncompromising Monism of Vedanta was much admired as the cream of the oriental wisdom. There have been different Idealistic views in Western and Indian philosophies as follows : Western Idealism (i) Platonic Idealism The Idealism of Plato is objective in the sense that the ideas enjoy an existence in a real world independent of any mind. Mind is not antecedent for the existence of ideas. The ideas are there whether a mind reveals them or not. The determination of the phenomenal world depends on them. They somehow determine the empirical existence of the world. Hence, Plato’s conception of reality is nothing but a system of eternal, immutable and immaterial ideas. (ii) Idealism of Berkeley Berkeley may be said to be the founder of Idealism in the modern period, although his arrow could not touch the point of destination.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Representation in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 11-2017 The perversion of the absolute: religion and representation in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit Thomas Floyd Wright DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Wright, Thomas Floyd, "The perversion of the absolute: religion and representation in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit" (2017). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 240. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/240 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PERVERSION OF THE ABSOLUTE Religion and Representation in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2017 BY Thomas Floyd Wright Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hegel contra Theology . 1 1.2 Marx, Ante-Hegel . 5 1.3 Hegel, post Hegel mortum . 11 1.4 Speculation and perversion . 16 2 The perversion of identity 22 2.1 The evil of ontotheology . 22 2.2 The perversion of desire: Augustine . 26 2.3 The perversion of speech: Hobbes . 30 2.4 The perversion of reason: Kant .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 25 Hegel's Absolute Idealism and the Phenomenology of Spirit
    Aspects of Western Philosophy: Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly, IIT Madras Chapter 25 Hegel’s Absolute Idealism and the Phenomenology of Spirit Key Words: Absolute idealism, contradictions, antinomies, Spirit, Absolute, absolute idealism, teleological causality, objective mind, universal mind, phenomenology of mind, consciousness, self-consciousness, reason. Hegel’s absolute idealism tries to arrive at an all-encompassing theory to bridge the finite with the infinite. He proclaims that, only the whole is real and hence all particular facts and concepts are incomplete and only partially true. Hegel advances a very interesting theory, which considers contradictions as natural. This is contrary to the traditional philosophical views, which considered contradictions as problematic, and something they need to be necessarily avoided. Hegel’s new way of thinking suggests that we can take the irrational approach of contradicting ourselves. He thus proposes to resolve the problem of antinomies exposed by the Kantian framework. Kant has shown that pure reason encounters antinomies when it tries to prove things, which are not given to us through the forms of sensibility and the conceptual categories. We thus encounter certain irresolvable contradictions. Kant suggests that to avoid this situation we should keep away from such ventures. He declares the impossibility of metaphysics as a science based on this scenario. Hegel on the other hand approaches reason from a different perspective. He was not prepared to accept the traditional view about the nature of reason, where the latter is conceived as a static faculty. His idealistic view states that cosmic history consists in the life story of spirit or Geist, which is the absolute.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case for the Failure of Hegel's Idealism
    The Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel’s Idealism What is a great mistake? Nietzsche once said that a great error is worth more than a multitude of trivial truths. A truly great mistake is one that we can learn from, where we gain new understanding from explaining why it is an error, where we are either forced to make explicit our previously vague intuitions, or forced to acknowledge properly counterintuitive results. Hegel understood this point well, as his analysis of the logical and historical development of human thought shows, for he takes each moment within this development to be a position that, while showing itself to be inconsistent, passes over into a more detailed position that incorporates its truth. It is my opinion that Hegel may have made the greatest such error in the history of philosophy to date, and this means that understanding why it is an error is of the utmost importance. To do this, it is necessary to examine the nature of Hegel’s position, which he calls Absolute Idealism. What is Absolute Idealism? The essence of Absolute Idealism is the thesis of the identity of subject and object, which we will simply call the identity thesis. It’s very important to understand what this doesn’t mean. It is not to be understood along the lines of the maxim of Berkeley’s subjective idealism: esse est percipi. It is not the case for Hegel that each individual object is identical with an individual subject that thinks it, or some state of that subject.
    [Show full text]
  • German Idealism: the Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781-1801
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Theology Faculty Research and Publications Theology, Department of 1-1-2004 Review of "German Idealism: The trS uggle Against Subjectivism, 1781-1801" by Frederick C. Beiser Philip J. Rossi Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. Theological Studies, Vol. 65, No. 1 (2004): 217-218. Permalinkf. © 2004 Theological Studies, Inc. Used with permission. BOOK REVIEWS 217 Catholic leaders to give us the married as well as the celibate diocesan priests we need. Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles JOHN A. COLEMAN, S.J. GERMAN IDEALISM:THE STRUGGLE AGAINST SUBJECTIVISM, 1781–1801. By Frederick C. Beiser. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2002. Pp. xvi + 726. $61.50. Beiser’s important earlier studies—The Fate of Reason (1987) and En- lightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism (1992)—placed the trajectory of ideas, issues, and arguments of late 18th- and early 19th-century German philosophy and political thought within an illuminating account of their cultural and political contexts. In this work, B. shifts attention from that larger background and presents, in contrast, a closely focused analysis of the texts of six thinkers—Kant, Fichte, Ho¨ lderlin, Novalis, Schlegel, and Schelling—that bear upon “one specific theme: the meaning of idealism itself, and more specifically the reaction against subjectivism” (viii). The analysis is in service of a larger thesis that goes counter to a commonly accepted interpretation of German idealism as “essentially the culmination of the Cartesian tradition,” which is usually accompanied by “a seductively simple narrative” that makes it “the gradual and inevitable completion of Kant’s ‘Copernican Revolution’”(1–2). B.
    [Show full text]
  • Idealism: a Love (Of Sophia) That Dare Not Speak Its Name
    Idealism: A Love (of Sophia) that Dare not Speak its Name PAUL REDDINl;' My first experience of philosophy at the University of Sydney was as a commencing undergraduate in the tumultuous year of 1973. At the start of that year, there was one department of philosophy, but by the beginning of the next there were two. These two departments seemed to be opposed in every possible way except one: they both professed to be committed to a form of materialist philosophy. One could think that having a common enemy at least might have been the cause for some degree of unanimity, but no: the traditional enemy of materialism - idealism - was regarded as having been long dead and buried. For the Marxists in the then Department of General Philosophy, it had been Marx who, in the second half of the nineteenth century, had 'inverted' Hegelian idealism into a form of materialism, while for the analytic philosophers in the Department of Traditional and Modern Philosophy, it had been Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore who had triumphed over British idealism at the turn of the twentieth. There may have been many things that were atypical about philosophy as it was done at Sydney in the early 1970s, but its resistance to idealism was not among them. Twenty years later, however, there were signs that old certitudes in Anglophone philosophy were changing, and in 1994, two books were published by mainstream analytic philosophers addressing issues central to analytic concern and suggesting that the philosophy of Hegel held the key to their solution. These books were Mind and World * Paul Redding holds a Personal Chair in Philosophy at the University of Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • I HEGEL's LOGIC of ABSOLUTE IDEALISM and HIS POLITICAL
    HEGEL’S LOGIC OF ABSOLUTE IDEALISM AND HIS POLITICAL ARGUMENT: THE CONCEPTUALITY OF ACTUALITY A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Matthew J. Smetona May, 2010 Examining Committee Members: Aryeh Botwinick, Advisory Chair, Political Science Joseph M. Schwartz, Political Science Carol C. Gould, Philosophy and Political Science Joseph Margolis, External Member, Philosophy i © by Matthew J. Smetona 2010 All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Title: Hegel’s Logic of Absolute Idealism and his Political Argument: The Conceptuality of Actuality Candidate’s Name: Matthew J. Smetona Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Temple University, 2010 Doctoral Advisory Committee Chair: Aryeh Botwinick This dissertation is about the theoretical foundation of Hegel’s political argument. Its goal is to comprehend the basic structure of that argument by articulating the conceptual framework Hegel employs when he asserts that the particular set of political institutions he is arguing for is rational. Its argument is that the criterion Hegel employs in his conception of rationality is that an object is rational if and only if it is comprehended by thought in and through the holistic inferential system of concepts he refers to as the Concept ( der Begriff ). Hegel’s final argument in the Science of Logic is that there can be no actual object that is not “rational,” i.e., that is not constituted, in all of its determinations, by the unified activity of thinking that is the Concept. Consequently, it is argued that the rationality, and therewith the actuality, of Hegel’s rational state depicted in the Philosophy of Right derives from the fact that it is comprehended by thought in and through the totality as thought that is the Concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel After Augustine, an Essay on Political Theology Geoffrey J.D
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Transcending Subjects: Hegel After Augustine, an Essay on Political Theology Geoffrey J.D. Holsclaw Marquette University Recommended Citation Holsclaw, Geoffrey J.D., "Transcending Subjects: Hegel After Augustine, an Essay on Political Theology" (2013). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 303. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/303 TRANSCENDING SUBJECTS: HEGEL AFTER AUGUSTINE, AN ESSAY ON POLITICAL THEOLOGY by Geoffrey J. D. Holsclaw, B.A., M.Div. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Milwaukee, Wisconsin December 2013 ABSTRACT TRANSCENDING SUBJECTS: HEGEL AFTER AUGUSTINE, AN ESSAY ON POLITICAL THEOLOGY Geoffrey J. D. Holsclaw, B.A., M.Div. Marquette University, 2013 From where do political reformers and radicals come who are willing and prepared to challenge the status quo? Where are people formed who are capable of initiating change within a political system? Some worry belief in transcendence closes off authentic political engagement and processes of transformation. Others think that a transcendent orientation is the only means to protect and promote a more free and just society. Some see a positive commitment to transcendence as inimical to democratic practices, while others see such a commitment as indispensible for such a project. These general issues concern transcendence, immanence, and subjectivity as they bear on the question of political transformation. Explaining the differences between these fundamental orientations prompts an investigation of the philosophical and theological systems of Hegel and Augustine. Examining Hegel and Augustine around the issues of transcendence and freedom offers a way to understand these more localized disagreements between political philosophers and theologians, and even between theologians.
    [Show full text]
  • Idealism, Panpsychism and Emergentism
    The Radical Wing of Consciousness Studies: Idealism, Panpsychism and Emergentism 1 Why Consider Radical Approaches? There is always a legitimate philosophical interest in the history of significant doctrines and there is no doubt that all of idealism, panpsychism and emergentism have illustrious pasts. They have been championed by very heavy weight thinkers; no history of philosophy could ignore them. But unlike topics that have, as we say, purely historical interest (for exam- ple, Aristotle’s views on spontaneous generation) the problem of consciousness remains the subject of intense investigation and despite staggering advances in the scientific study of the brain remains fundamentally unsolved. Why is that? The answer lies in a certain under- standing of the physical and the roadblock this throws up when we try to integrate subjective experience into a world whose nature is restricted to that conception of the physical. The modern locus of this concern is Thomas Nagel’s (1974) famous reflection on our inability to get a grip on the subjective nature of non-human consciousness despite the openness to investigation of the objective world specified in our physical theories1. This way of problematizing consciousness shows that it can be understood in quite simple terms: not ‘self-consciousness’ or ‘transcendental subjectivity’, or awareness of the self as a subject, or awareness of one’s own mental states, or the ability to conceptualize one’s own mental states as such. Consciousness is simply sentience, or the way things are present to the mind (abstracting from the question of whether anything exists which matches what is present).
    [Show full text]
  • Idealism Without Absolutes
    Introduction Tilottama Rajan In the past decade the philosophical tradition of German Idealism has come to be recognized as a rich and complex part of “Theory,” while this field itself has been associated with a fundamentally interdisciplinary way of thinking and range of practices. Yet there has been little intensive consideration of either the disciplinary or interdisciplinary nature of Idealism itself. Nor has much attention been given to the ways in which philosophy—the discipline in which Idealism is anchored—is itself hybridized and de-idealized by its connections with other fields. This volume attempts to rethink the conceptuality and disciplinarity of post-Kantian philosophy across the full range of the long romantic period, from Immanuel Kant and the Schlegels at one end, through the post-Kantian Idealists, to Friedrich Nietzsche. The volume is thus organized by three interconnected concerns. First, the essays share a sense that it is possible to have an idealism without the totalizing formulas often associated with post-Kantian philosophy, as repre- sented by such concepts (conventionally interpreted) as G. W. F. Hegel’s Absolute Knowledge or J. G. Fichte’s Absolute Ego. The space for this ide- alism is created by a particular symbiosis between ideality and materiality. Second, this symbiosis often occurs through the contamination or extension of philosophy into other, more “material” disciplines such as psychology, history, or literature. At stake, then, is the very identity of philosophy as the host for a variety of other parasitic discourses that reciprocally reconfigure philosophy itself. In such circumstances it would be easy to read the intellec- tual tradition studied here through twentieth-century lenses.
    [Show full text]
  • Idealism and Education: Continuities and Transformations in Schelling's Philosophy and Its Implications for a Philosophy of Education Kristian Simcox
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Philosophy ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2-14-2014 Idealism and Education: Continuities and Transformations in Schelling's Philosophy and Its Implications for a Philosophy of Education Kristian Simcox Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/phil_etds Recommended Citation Simcox, Kristian. "Idealism and Education: Continuities and Transformations in Schelling's Philosophy and Its Implications for a Philosophy of Education." (2014). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/phil_etds/4 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank Dr. Adrian Johnston, my advisor and dissertation chair, for his dedication to my success and his refusal to let me surrender to the occasional temptation to abandon this project. His commitment, expressed in years of collaborative textual research, in demonstrated interest in both my academic progress and personal wellbeing, and in countless other ways cannot be overstated. I also thank my committee members, Dr. Brent Kalar, Dr. Iain Thomson, and Dr. John Lysaker. Without their help, at many important stages along the way, I could not have achieved the success I have enjoyed as a student and a teacher. I am infinitely indebted to my mother, Elizabeth Shea, for her endless love and support. The knowledge that you are always on my side has sustained me through the darkest moments of self-doubt.
    [Show full text]
  • Christianity and Idealism
    Christianity And Idealism Westminster Theological Seminary Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 1955 Copyright 1955 By The Presbyterian And Reformed Publishing Company Philadelphia, Pa. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 55-9041 Preface From time to time I have written on the relation of idealist philosophy to Christianity. It is obvious that such philosophies as materialism and pragmatism are foes of Christianity. It is less obvious but no less true that Idealism and Christianity are mutually exclusive. Christianity teaches man to worship and serve God the Creator. Idealism, no less than materialism or pragmatism, teaches man to serve and worship the creature. Idealism has a language which resembles that of Christianity but its thought content leads inevitably toward pragmatism. That is the idea expressed in the articles that are herewith reproduced. The relation between Idealism and Christianity has recently become a controversial issue among Reformed Christians. This accounts for the republishing of these articles. Cornelius Van Til September, 1955 Philadelphia, Pa. Contents God And The Absolute Evangelical Quarterly, Vol. 2, 1930 Recent American Philosophy Philosophia Reformata, Vol. 2, 1937 The Theism Of A. E. Taylor Westminster Theological Journal, May, 1939 Philosophic Foundations Evangelical Quarterly, Vol. 13, 1941 Studies In The Philosophy Of Religion Westminster Theological Journal, November, 1939 A Sacramental Universe Westminster Theological Journal, May, 1940 The Nature And Destiny Of Man Westminster Theological Journal, November, 1941 The Logic Of Belief Westminster Theological Journal, November, 1942 The Doctrine Of God Christianity Today, December, 1930 Kant Or Christ? Calvin Forum, February, 1942 God And The Absolute In many quarters the idea seems to prevail that Idealism and Christianity have found an alliance against all forms of Pragmatism.
    [Show full text]