DOCSLIB.ORG

Important Grass Subfamilies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Important Grass Subfamilies Important Grass Subfamilies Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters – Pseudopetioles – Fusoid cells – Arm cells – Kranz anatomy – Bulliform cells – Bicellular microhairs Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters – Pseudopetioles – Fusoid cells – Arm cells – Kranz anatomy – Bulliform cells – Bicellular microhairs pseudopetioles Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters – Pseudopetioles – Fusoid cells – Arm cells – Kranz anatomy – Bulliform cells – Bicellular microhairs Fusoid cells Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters – Pseudopetioles – Fusoid cells – Arm cells – Kranz anatomy – Bulliform cells – Bicellular microhairs Fusoid cells Arm cells Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters – Pseudopetioles – Fusoid cells – Arm cells – Kranz anatomy – Bulliform cells – Bicellular microhairs Kranz anatomy Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters – Pseudopetioles – Fusoid cells – Arm cells – Kranz anatomy – Bulliform cells – Bicellular microhairs Bulliform cells Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters – Pseudopetioles – Fusoid cells – Arm cells – Kranz anatomy – Bulliform cells – Bicellular microhairs Bicellular microhairs Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters • Floret Characters – Lodicules – Anthers – Stigmas lodicules Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters • Floret Characters – Lodicules – Anthers – Stigmas anthers Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters • Floret Characters – Lodicules – Anthers – Stigmas stigmas Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • DNA • Leaf Characters • Floret Characters • Embryo Characters epiblast Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • Embryo Characters – Epiblast – Scutellar cleft – Mesocotylinternode – Embryonic leaf margins epiblast Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • Embryo Characters – Epiblast – Scutellar cleft – Mesocotylinternode – Embryonic leaf margins Scutellar Cleft Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • Embryo Characters – Epiblast – Scutellar cleft – Mesocotylinternode – Embryonic leaf margins Mesocotyl internode Characteristics used to classify grass subfamilies • Embryo Characters – Epiblast – Scutellar cleft – Mesocotylinternode – Embryonic leaf margins Grass Subfamilies 1. Anomochlooideae 7. Micraioideae 2. Aristidoideae 8. Oryzoideae 3. Arundinoideae 9. Panicoideae 4. Bambusoideae 10. Pharoideae 5. Chloridoideae 11. Puelioideae 6. Danthonioideae 12. Pooideae “Lower” Subfamilies • Anomochlooideae • Pharoideae • Puelioideae • Bambusoideae –Above are perennial, rhizomatous, pseudopetioles, variable numbers of flower parts –Bamboos – monocarpic, cultural importance Subfamily Oryzoideae • Tribe Oryzeae – Zizania – Oryza – Leersia oryzoides Pooideae • “cool season” grasses • largest group (>4000 species) – Tribe Stipeae • Achnatherum, Hesperostipa, Nassella, Oryzopsis – Tribe Poeae • Agrostis, Alopecurus, Avena, Calamagrostis, Dactylis, Festuca, Koeleria, Lolium, Phalaris, Phleum, Poa, Puccinellia, Schedonorus, Vulpia – Tribe Bromeae • Bromus – Tribe Triticeae • Agropyron, Elymus, Hordeum, Leymus, Pascopyrum, Pseudoroegneria, Secale, Thinopyrum, Triticum Subfamily Aristoideae • Tribe Aristideae – Aristida Subfamily Panicoideae • Tribe Paniceae – Cenchrus, Dichanthelium, Digitaria, Echinochloa, Panicum, Setaria • Tribe Andropogoneae – Andropogon, Miscanthus, Schizachyrium, Sorghum, Zea • Economic importance of Saccharum, Sorghum, Zea Subfamily Arundinoideae • Phragmites Subfamily Danthonioideae • Danthonia Subfamily Chloridoideae • Tribe Eragrostideae – Eragrostis • Tribe Zoysieae – Calamovilfa, Spartina, Sporobolus • Tribe Cynodonteae – Bouteloua, Chloris, Distichlis, Muhlenbergia emb lf pseudopet fusoid arm Kranz bulliform bicell micro lodicule anther stigmas embryo epiblast scutel cleft meso interno marg Bambusoideae Y Y Y N N Y 3 various 1-4 small Y Y N overlap Oryzoideae Y/N Y/N Y/N N Y Y 2 3-6 2 small Y Y N overlap Pooideae N N N N Y N 2 3 2 small Y N N overlap Aristidoideae N N N Y/N Y Y 2 1-3 2 s or l N Y/N Y meet Panicoideae Y/N N N Y/N Y Y 2 1-3 2 large N Y Y overlap Arundinoideae N N Y/N N Y Y 2 2-3 2 large N Y Y meet Danthonioideae N N N N Y/N Y 2 3 2 s or l N Y Y mt/ovr Chloridoideae N N N Y Y Y 2, 0 1-3 2 large Y Y Y meet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Christopher Dean Tyrrell Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2008 Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Christopher Dean Tyrrell Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Tyrrell, Christopher Dean, "Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)" (2008). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15419. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15419 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) by Christopher Dean Tyrrell A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: Lynn G. Clark, Major Professor Dennis V. Lavrov Robert S. Wallace Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2008 Copyright © Christopher Dean Tyrrell, 2008. All rights reserved. 1457571 1457571 2008 ii In memory of Thomas D. Tyrrell Festum Asinorum iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT iv CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 Background and Significance 1 Research Objectives 5 Thesis Organization 6 Literature Cited 6 CHAPTER 2. PHYLOGENY OF THE BAMBOO SUBTRIBE 9 ARTHROSTYLIDIINAE WITH EMPHASIS ON RHIPIDOCLADUM Abstract 9 Introduction 10 Methods and Materials 13 Results 19 Discussion 25 Taxonomic Treatment 26 Literature Cited 31 CHAPTER 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny of the Hubbardochloinae Including Tetrachaete (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae)
    Peterson, P.M., K. Romaschenko, and Y. Herrera Arrieta. 2020. A phylogeny of the Hubbardochloinae including Tetrachaete (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae). Phytoneuron 2020-81: 1–13. Published 18 November 2020. ISSN 2153 733 A PHYLOGENY OF THE HUBBARDOCHLOINAE INCLUDING TETRACHAETE (CYNODONTEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE: POACEAE) PAUL M. PETERSON AND KONSTANTIN ROMASCHENKO Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected]; [email protected] YOLANDA HERRERA ARRIETA Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIIDIR Unidad Durango-COFAA Durango, C.P. 34220, México [email protected] ABSTRACT The phylogeny of subtribe Hubbardochloinae is revisited, here with the inclusion of the monotypic genus Tetrachaete, based on a molecular DNA analysis using ndhA intron, rpl32-trnL, rps16 intron, rps16- trnK, and ITS markers. Tetrachaete elionuroides is aligned within the Hubbardochloinae and is sister to Dignathia. The biogeography of the Hubbardochloinae is discussed, its origin likely in Africa or temperate Asia. In a previous molecular DNA phylogeny (Peterson et al. 2016), the subtribe Hubbardochloinae Auquier [Bewsia Gooss., Dignathia Stapf, Gymnopogon P. Beauv., Hubbardochloa Auquier, Leptocarydion Hochst. ex Stapf, Leptothrium Kunth, and Lophacme Stapf] was found in a clade with moderate support (BS = 75, PP = 1.00) sister to the Farragininae P.M. Peterson et al. In the present study, Tetrachaete elionuroides Chiov. is included in a phylogenetic analysis (using ndhA intron, rpl32- trnL, rps16 intron, rps16-trnK, and ITS DNA markers) in order to test its relationships within the Cynodonteae with heavy sampling of species in the supersubtribe Gouiniodinae P.M. Peterson & Romasch. Chiovenda (1903) described Tetrachaete Chiov. with a with single species, T.
    [Show full text]
  • CATALOGUE of the GRASSES of CUBA by A. S. Hitchcock
    CATALOGUE OF THE GRASSES OF CUBA By A. S. Hitchcock. INTRODUCTION. The following list of Cuban grasses is based primarily upon the collections at the Estaci6n Central Agron6mica de Cuba, situated at Santiago de las Vegas, a suburb of Habana. The herbarium includes the collections made by the members of the staff, particularly Mr. C. F. Baker, formerly head of the department of botany, and also the Sauvalle Herbarium deposited by the Habana Academy of Sciences, These specimens were examined by the writer during a short stay upon the island in the spring of 1906, and were later kindly loaned by the station authorities for a more critical study at Washington. The Sauvalle Herbarium contains a fairly complete set of the grasses col- lected by Charles Wright, the most important collection thus far obtained from Cuba. In addition to the collections at the Cuba Experiment Station, the National Herbarium furnished important material for study, including collections made by A. H. Curtiss, W. Palmer and J. H. Riley, A. Taylor (from the Isle of Pines), S. M. Tracy, Brother Leon (De la Salle College, Habana), and the writer. The earlier collections of Wright were sent to Grisebach for study. These were reported upon by Grisebach in his work entitled "Cata- logus Plant arum Cubensium," published in 1866, though preliminary reports appeared earlier in the two parts of Plantae Wrightianae. * During the spring of 1907 I had the opportunity of examining the grasses in the herbarium of Grisebach in Gottingen.6 In the present article I have, with few exceptions, accounted for the grasses listed by Grisebach in his catalogue of Cuban plants, and have appended a list of these with references to the pages in the body of this article upon which the species are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Triticeae Biodiversity and Conservation, a “Genebanker” View
    Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 41, 2005 (Special Issue) Triticeae Biodiversity and Conservation, a “Genebanker” View V. H������ Department of Gene Bank, Research Institute of Crop Production, 161 06 Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Wild Triticeae are important genetic resources for cultivated cereals. While wild and primitive wheats are well preserved, other genera are rather neglected. Most of Triticeae have a large area of distribution, many occupy secondary habitats, or are weedy. However, there are also species with a limited distribution and those need primary attention in conservation. Annuals can be easily stored ex situ as easily as cultivated cereals; peren- nials have their longevity shortened. For successful conservation of genetic diversity one sample of a species is not enough. It is necessary to collect samples from the whole distribution area. Geographically distant popula- tions differ not only morphologically, but can have different spectra of genes. Even within a population there are large differences. For species scattered in distribution or restricted to a certain small area, it is reasonable to consider their in situ conservation. The basic requirement is to protect the locality/ies and to ensure that they are managed for sustainable reproduction of the Triticeae. Basically, this requires maintaining acceptable levels of use by man (grazing and disturbance), acceptable levels of plant competition from other species, and controlling allochtonous invasive species. Localities with in situ conservation require instant monitoring. A detailed docu- mentation (so called passport data) is prerequisite for both ex situ and in situ conservation. The taxonomic system must be conservative, without frequent nomenclatoral changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasses of Oklahoma
    osu p.llaotten Technical Bulletin No. 3 October, 1938 OKLABOJIA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE AGRICULTURAL ExPERIMENT STATION Lippert S. Ellis, Acting Director GRASSES OF OKLAHOMA By B. I. FEATHERLY Professor of Botany and Plant Pathology Stillwater, Oklahoma Technical Bulletin No. 3 October, 1938 OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Lippert S. Ellis. Acting Director GRASSES OF OI(LAHO~lA By H. I. FEATHERLY Professor of Botany and Plant Pathology Stillwater, Oklahoma ERRATA Page 6, No. 6: For "Leptochlea" read "Leptochloa." Page 10, No. 3 (second line): For "E. colona" read "E. colonum." Page 11, in "Distribution" of Phalaris caroliniana (Walt.): For "Ste-.vens" read "Stevens." Page 23, No. 2b: J:o"'or "Elymus canadensis ar. brachystachys" read "Elymus canadensis var. brachystachys." Page 28: For "Cynodon Dactylon ... etc." read "Cynodon dactylon (I,.) Pers. (Capriola dactylon Kuntz.) Bermuda G1·ass." Page 41, No. 13: For "Aristida divaricata Humb. and Bonnl." read "Aristida divaricata Humb. and Bonpl." Page 65, No. 3: For "Triodia clongata" read "Triodia elongata." Page 67. No. 11 (thud linel: For "ekels" read "keels." Page 71, No. 9 and Fig 81: For "Eragrostis sessilispicata" read "EragTostis sessilispica." Page 84, first line at top of page: For Melica nitens (Nutt.)'' re~d '?tE:cH~·a nH:ens CSc-;:itn.) !-Iutt." Page 106, No. 12, third line of description: For "within white margins" read "with white margins." Page 117. No. 2: l',or "Erianthus ... etc." read "Erianthus alopecuroides (L.) Ell. (E. divaricatus (L.) Hitchc.) Silver Plume-grass." Fage 123, No. 8: For "(A. torreanus Steud.)" read "A. tor­ rey:Jnus Steuc1.)" PREFACE The grass family needs no introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Registration of the Triticeae-CAP Spring Wheat Nested Association Mapping Population
    Published February 28, 2019 JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS MAPPING POPULATION Registration of the Triticeae-CAP Spring Wheat Nested Association Mapping Population N. K. Blake, M. Pumphrey, K. Glover, S. Chao, K. Jordan, J.-L. Jannick, E. A. Akhunov, J. Dubcovsky, H. Bockelman, and L. E. Talbert* Abstract andrace accessions of wheat (Triticum aestivum The Triticeae-CAP spring wheat nested association mapping L.) are a potentially important resource for superior population (Reg. No. MP-10, NSL 527060 MAP) consisting of genes to improve modern wheat cultivars. The landrace recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations derived from 32 Laccessions themselves are typically inferior to modern cultivars spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) accessions each crossed to for both agronomic and quality characteristics. This is particu- a common spring wheat parent, ‘Berkut’, has been released. larly true when landraces from one region are grown in a differ- The spring wheat accessions consisted of 29 landraces and ent locale in that important alleles for adaptation to biotic and three cultivars. Each population consists of approximately 75 abiotic factors are lacking. A challenge for breeders is that supe- lines for a total of 2325 RILs (Reg. Nos. GSTR No. 14701–GSTR 17133). The RILs have all been genotyped with the Illumina rior alleles are difficult to detect in a background of undesir- wheat iSelect 90K single nucleotide polymorphism array able alleles that typify the landraces. The increased efficiency of using the Infinium assay method and through genotype-by- modern genotyping capabilities has provided an opportunity to sequencing. This nested association mapping population identify superior alleles from nonadapted germplasm for incor- provides a genotyped germplasm resource for the wheat poration into elite breeding material.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis Resolves Trisetum
    Journal of Systematics JSE and Evolution doi: 10.1111/jse.12523 Research Article Molecular phylogenetic analysis resolves Trisetum (Poaceae: Pooideae: Koeleriinae) polyphyletic: Evidence for a new genus, Sibirotrisetum and resurrection of Acrospelion Patricia Barberá1,3*,RobertJ.Soreng2 , Paul M. Peterson2* , Konstantin Romaschenko2 , Alejandro Quintanar1, and Carlos Aedo1 1Department of Biodiversity and Conservation, Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid 28014, Spain 2Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20013‐7012, USA 3Department of Africa and Madagascar, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA *Authors for correspondence. Patricia Barberá. E‐mail: [email protected]; Paul M. Peterson. E‐mail: [email protected] Received 4 March 2019; Accepted 5 May 2019; Article first published online 22 June 2019 Abstract To investigate the evolutionary relationships among the species of Trisetum and other members of subtribe Koeleriinae, a phylogeny based on DNA sequences from four gene regions (ITS, rpl32‐trnL spacer, rps16‐trnK spacer, and rps16 intron) is presented. The analyses, including type species of all genera in Koeleriinae (Acrospelion, Avellinia, Cinnagrostis, Gaudinia, Koeleria, Leptophyllochloa, Limnodea, Peyritschia, Rostraria, Sphenopholis, Trisetaria, Trisetopsis, Trisetum), along with three outgroups, confirm previous indications of extensive polyphyly of Trisetum. We focus on the monophyletic Trisetum sect. Sibirica cladethatweinterprethereasadistinctgenus,Sibirotrisetum gen. nov. We include adescriptionofSibirotrisetum with the following seven new combinations: Sibirotrisetum aeneum, S. bifidum, S. henryi, S. scitulum, S. sibiricum, S. sibiricum subsp. litorale,andS. turcicum; and a single new combination in Acrospelion: A. distichophyllum. Trisetum s.s. is limited to one, two or three species, pending further study. Key words: Acrospelion, Aveneae, grasses, molecular systematics, Poeae, Sibirotrisetum, taxonomy, Trisetum.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Subfamilial Classification of the Grasses (Poaceae) Author(S): Grass Phylogeny Working Group, Nigel P
    Phylogeny and Subfamilial Classification of the Grasses (Poaceae) Author(s): Grass Phylogeny Working Group, Nigel P. Barker, Lynn G. Clark, Jerrold I. Davis, Melvin R. Duvall, Gerald F. Guala, Catherine Hsiao, Elizabeth A. Kellogg, H. Peter Linder Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Vol. 88, No. 3 (Summer, 2001), pp. 373-457 Published by: Missouri Botanical Garden Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3298585 Accessed: 06/10/2008 11:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mobot. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Cynodonteae Tribe
    POACEAE [GRAMINEAE] – GRASS FAMILY Plant: annuals or perennials Stem: jointed stem is termed a culm – internodial stem most often hollow but always solid at node, mostly round, some with stolons (creeping stem) or rhizomes (underground stem) Root: usually fibrous, often very abundant and dense Leaves: mostly linear, sessile, parallel veins, in 2 ranks (vertical rows), leaf sheath usually open or split and often overlapping, but may be closed Flowers: small in 2 rows forming a spikelet (1 to several flowers), may be 1 to many spikelets with pedicels or sessile to stem; each flower within a spikelet is between an outer limna (bract, with a midrib) and an inner palea (bract, 2-nerved or keeled usually) – these 3 parts together make the floret – the 2 bottom bracts of the spikelet do not have flowers and are termed glumes (may be reduced or absent), the rachilla is the axis that hold the florets; sepals and petals absent; 1-6 but often 3 stamens; 1 pistil, 1-3 but usually 2 styles, ovary superior, 1 ovule – there are exceptions to most everything!! Fruit: seed-like grain (seed usually fused to the pericarp (ovary wall) or not) Other: very large and important family; Monocotyledons Group Genera: 600+ genera; locally many genera 2 slides per species WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive POACEAE [GRAMINEAE] – CYNODONTEAE TRIBE Sideoats Grama; Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr. var. curtipendula - Cynodonteae (Tribe) Bermuda Grass; Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. (Introduced) - Cynodonteae (Tribe) Egyptian Grass [Durban Crowfoot]; Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd (Introduced) [Indian] Goose Grass; Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.
    [Show full text]
  • 22. Tribe ERAGROSTIDEAE Ihl/L^Ä Huameicaozu Chen Shouliang (W-"^ G,), Wu Zhenlan (ß^E^^)
    POACEAE 457 at base, 5-35 cm tall, pubescent. Basal leaf sheaths tough, whit- Enneapogon schimperianus (A. Richard) Renvoize; Pap- ish, enclosing cleistogamous spikelets, finally becoming fi- pophorum aucheri Jaubert & Spach; P. persicum (Boissier) brous; leaf blades usually involute, filiform, 2-12 cm, 1-3 mm Steudel; P. schimperianum Hochstetter ex A. Richard; P. tur- wide, densely pubescent or the abaxial surface with longer comanicum Trautvetter. white soft hairs, finely acuminate. Panicle gray, dense, spike- Perennial. Culms compactly tufted, wiry, erect or genicu- hke, linear to ovate, 1.5-5 x 0.6-1 cm. Spikelets with 3 fiorets, late, 15^5 cm tall, pubescent especially below nodes. Basal 5.5-7 mm; glumes pubescent, 3-9-veined, lower glume 3-3.5 mm, upper glume 4-5 mm; lowest lemma 1.5-2 mm, densely leaf sheaths tough, lacking cleistogamous spikelets, not becom- villous; awns 2-A mm, subequal, ciliate in lower 2/3 of their ing fibrous; leaf blades usually involute, rarely fiat, often di- length; third lemma 0.5-3 mm, reduced to a small tuft of awns. verging at a wide angle from the culm, 3-17 cm, "i-^ mm wide, Anthers 0.3-0.6 mm. PL and &. Aug-Nov. 2« = 36. pubescent, acuminate. Panicle olive-gray or tinged purplish, contracted to spikelike, narrowly oblong, 4•18 x 1-2 cm. Dry hill slopes; 1000-1900 m. Anhui, Hebei, Liaoning, Nei Mon- Spikelets with 3 or 4 florets, 8-14 mm; glumes puberulous, (5-) gol, Ningxia, Qinghai, Shanxi, Xinjiang, Yunnan [India, Kazakhstan, 7-9-veined, lower glume 5-10 mm, upper glume 7-11 mm; Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Pakistan, E Russia; Africa, America, SW Asia].
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Related to Whom?
    149 Who’s related to whom? Recent results from molecular systematic studies Elizabeth A Kellogg Similarities among model systems can lead to generalizations systematist’s question-why are there so many different about plants, but understanding the differences requires kinds of organisms? Studies of the evolution of develop- systematic data. Molecular phylogenetic analyses produce ment demand that the investigator go beyond the model results similar to traditional classifications in the grasses system and learn the pattern of variation in its relatives (Poaceae), and relationships among the cereal crops [3*]. This requires a reasonable assessment of the relatives’ are quite clear. Chloroplast-based phylogenies for the identity. Solanaceae show that tomato is best considered as a species of Solarium, closely related to potatoes. Traditional Knowledge of plant relationships has increased rapidly classifications in the Brassicaceae are misleading with in the past decade, reflecting partly the development regard to true phylogenetic relationships and data are only of molecular systematics. It has been known for some now beginning to clarify the situation. Molecular data are time that plant classifications do not reflect phylogeny also being used to revise our view of relationships among accurately, even though both phylogeny and classification flowering plant families. Phylogenetic data are critical for are hierarchical. The hierarchy of classification was interpreting hypotheses of the evolution of development. imposed in the late 18th century, well before ideas of descent with modification (evolution) were prevalent [4]. These pre-evolutionary groups were then re-interpreted in Address an evolutionary context, and were assumed to be products Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge, MA of evolution, rather than man-made artefacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasses of the Texas Hill Country: Vegetative Key and Descriptions
    Hagenbuch, K.W. and D.E. Lemke. 2015. Grasses of the Texas Hill Country: Vegetative key and descriptions. Phytoneuron 2015-4: 1–93. Published 7 January 2015. ISSN 2153 733X GRASSES OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY: VEGETATIVE KEY AND DESCRIPTIONS KARL W. HAGENBUCH Department of Biological Sciences San Antonio College 1300 San Pedro Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78212-4299 [email protected] DAVID E. LEMKE Department of Biology Texas State University 601 University Drive San Marcos, Texas 78666-4684 [email protected] ABSTRACT A key and a set of descriptions, based solely on vegetative characteristics, is provided for the identification of 66 genera and 160 grass species, both native and naturalized, of the Texas Hill Country. The principal characters used (features of longevity, growth form, roots, rhizomes and stolons, culms, leaf sheaths, collars, auricles, ligules, leaf blades, vernation, vestiture, and habitat) are discussed and illustrated. This treatment should prove useful at times when reproductive material is not available. Because of its size and variation in environmental conditions, Texas provides habitat for well over 700 species of grasses (Shaw 2012). For identification purposes, the works of Correll and Johnston (1970); Gould (1975) and, more recently, Shaw (2012) treat Texas grasses in their entirety. In addition to these comprehensive works, regional taxonomic treatments have been done for the grasses of the Cross Timbers and Prairies (Hignight et al. 1988), the South Texas Brush Country (Lonard 1993; Everitt et al. 2011), the Gulf Prairies and Marshes (Hatch et al. 1999), and the Trans-Pecos (Powell 1994) natural regions. In these, as well as in numerous other manuals and keys, accurate identification of grass species depends on the availability of reproductive material.
    [Show full text]