DOCSLIB.ORG

Mammals Enhanced Study Guide 7 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mammals Enhanced Study Guide 7 2018 Tennessee Naturalist Program Tennessee Mammals Creatures of Habitat Enhanced Study Guide 12/2015 Tennessee Naturalist Program www.tnnaturalist.org Inspiring the desire to learn and share Tennessee’s nature These study guides are designed to reflect and reinforce the Tennessee Naturalist Program’s course curriculum outline, developed and approved by the TNP Board of Directors, for use by TNP instructors to plan and organize classroom discussion and fieldworK components and by students as a meaningful resource to review and enhance class instruction. This guide was compiled specifically for the Tennessee Naturalist Program and reviewed by experts in this discipline. It contains copyrighted worK from other authors and publishers, used here by permission. No part of this document may be reproduced or shared without consent of the Tennessee Naturalist Program and appropriate copyright holders. 2 Tennessee Mammals Creatures of Habitat Objectives Present an overview of mammals including characteristics particular to this class of animals and the different groups of mammals found in Tennessee. Explore their behavior, physiology, and ecology, relating these to habitat needs, environmental adaptations, and ecosystem roles, including human interactions. Time Minimum 4 hours – 2 in class, 2 in field Suggested Materials ( * recommended but not required, ** TNP flash drive) • Mammals of North America, Fourth Edition (Peterson Field Guides), Fiona Reid * • Mammals of North America, Second Edition, (Princeton Field Guides), Roland W. Keys and Don E. Wilson • Tennessee Mammals Enhanced Study Guide, TNP ** • TWRA Bone Box Expected Outcomes Students will gain a basic understanding of 1. the diversity and distribution of mammals in Tennessee, including rare species 2. the major groups of mammals and their systematic relationships 3. the distinguishing characteristics of all mammals and general characteristics of each major group 4. mammal behavior - breeding, feeding, shelter, hibernation, and range/territory 5. mammal physiology and morphology - environmental adaptations, functions, species identification 6. mammal ecology - habitat needs, ecosystem roles 7. animal tracKs and signs 8. animal and human interactions 3 Mammals Curriculum Outline I. Mammals A. Class characteristics II. Mammals of Tennessee A. Diversity and distribution B. Common mammal Orders, their relationships and differences 1. opossums 2. moles and shrews 3. bats 4. rabbits 5. rodents 6. carnivores 7. hoofed mammals C. Nonnative species and their impacts D. Rare species and their conservation concerns III. Mammal Behavior A. Feeding B. Breeding C. Nesting, territory, home range D. Hibernation and winter survival E. Defensive strategies IV. Mammal Physiology and Morphology A. Environmental adaptations B. Functions C. Identification 1. sKins, pelts 2. sKulls 3. teeth V. Mammal Ecology A. Habitat variety and ‘home’ needs B. Ecological role 1. food web 2. predators 3. Keystone species C. Diurnal, crepuscular, nocturnal 4 VI. Observations in the Wild A. TracKs B. Signs C. Scat VII. Wild Mammals and Human Interactions A. Habitat loss, fragmentation, and encroachment B. Management concerns and strategies 1. population monitoring and measuring 2. trapping and tagging C. Hurt, captured or orphaned animals VIII. Resources A. Publications B. Organizations C. Internet 5 I. Mammals Introduction There are over 5,400 species of mammals worldwide. Of these, nearly 25 percent are threatened and at risK of extinction. The United States has over 410 species and 80 are on the endangered species list. Tennessee’s mammals (current and historical) number 86 (Kennedy et al. 2012), representing a diversity from northern species in the mountains to western species. Common mammal characteristics As a class (Mammalia), mammals exhibit several common characteristics that separate them from other vertebrate animal groups possessing an internal sKeleton with a bacKbone. All mammals share the three asterisKed (*) characteristics; exceptions may be found for the others. • hair or fur on the body at some point during life * (most have hair their entire lives) • generally endothermic, producing body heat internally, and homeothermic, maintaining constant temperature • give birth to live young (egg-laying exceptions not found in Tennessee) • milK producing mammary glands to feed young * • three middle ear bones (hammer, anvil, stirrup) * In addition, most mammals have a single bone lower jaw, four-chambered heart, highly developed brain, secondary palate separating air and food passages in the mouth, muscular diaphragm between the thoracic and abdominal cavities, internal fertilization, and separate sexes with embryo sex determined by the presence of a Y or two X chromosomes. Differences Differences among mammal species in physical morphology, physiology, behavior, ecology, etc., form the basis for identification. • anatomy -- hard (sKeleton, particularly sKulls) and soft tissue • teeth -- differentiated tooth types; also give clues to diet and habitat • embryonic development -- placental, marsupial, and egg laying (not in Tennessee) • morphological extremes -- diversity of forms, bodies designed for flying, running, hopping, burrowing, climbing, gliding, or swimming and vast size differences • active time of day -- nocturnal (night), diurnal (day), or crepuscular (dawn and dusK) 6 Habitat Tennessee has a great diversity of land types. Therefore, habitats also vary widely. Within these habitats, different mammal species find homes suited to their life history strategies. There are four main home types with local examples of each. • arboreal -- squirrels, golden mouse • aquatic -- beaver, musKrat • home seeKers (looK for shelter in caves, logs or manmade structures) -- bats, bobcat • homeless (bed down in a different place each night) -- deer, elK Each species is adapted to specific habitats. Problems arise when habitats are altered, whether by loss, fragmentation, disease, or the introduction of exotic species. Non-native species in Tennessee • roof rat • brown rat (Norway rat) • house mouse • nutria or coypu • domestic dog and domestic cat • wild hog (European boar) Extirpated native species in Tennessee • snowshoe hare • North American porcupine • gray wolf • red wolf • cougar Extirpated and reintroduced native species in Tennessee • fisher • elK • bison (captive herds, not free roaming) 7 Tennessee Mammals: Quick Facts Virginia Opossum (1 sp.) Order Didelphimorphia only marsupial in TN (related to the Kangaroo of Australia) pouch runs front to bacK, bears up to 13 young that crawl from vagina to pouch coarse, grizzled grayish fur, naked tail and ears, pinK toes and nose opposable thumbs on hind feet relatively disease free 50 teeth, more than any other mammal in TN sometimes ‘play possum’ (feign death) when threatened young can hang by tail, adults are a bit too heavy ears and tail can get frostbitten range moving north Shrews (9 spp.) and Moles (3 spp.) Order Soricomorpha Shrews have musK glands, stinK voracious predator with insatiable appetite, must eat 2-3 times weight daily insectivores, also eat smaller mammals, aggressive attacKers brown-tipped teeth and tiny eyes shrews are hard to identify to species a couple of species echolocate food one is poisonous with neurotoxin toward prey some species prefer grassland habitats, some woodland pygmy shrew is one of the smallest mammals in the world East Tennessee has more species of shrews Moles: eastern mole statewide, star-nosed and hairy-tailed moles limited and uncommon hair stands on end, unidirectional to repel dirt regardless of animals direction source of Victorian powder puffs tunnels using broad forepaws, white teeth voracious eaters, insect and worm fossorial (spend most time underground) incisors small, tiny eyes, no external ears sKulls distinctive among three species of moles predators include coyotes, hawKs, owls, foxes, and house cats 8 Bats (15 spp.) Order Chiroptera (hand-wing) evening bats -- tragus (small pointed structure, part of external ear) ID character TN has small bats, larger fruit-eating bats are not in TN eastern red bat, perhaps most common species in TN eastern pipistrelle, smallest, often in houses, can carry rabies less than 1% (0.5 %) of the bat population have rabies echolocate insects, shut down ears during cry and open again to hear echo 8-15 cries per second normally, sudden movements 150-200 cries/sec nest in caves, trees (under barK), buildings most go into torpor in winter, Little Brown Bat is a true hibernator two listed endangered species bats are sensitive to their environment White Nose Syndrome, a fungal disease of cave bats, results in high mortality Armadillo (1 sp.) Order Cingulata Dasypus (hairy foot) novemcinctus (nine banded) non-native, but relatively benign, moving north and east of historic range bacK is covered in sKin plates born with plates, harden as they mature peg teeth, eat insects, ants, and termites (including fire ants) claws for digging, reduced teeth in reproduction, the egg splits to form four genetically identical young move fast and jump when scared, which is why cars Kill so many called ‘possum on the half shell’ coyotes are predators carry leprosy and are used in research Rabbit (4 spp.) Order Lagomorpha eastern cottontail, swamp rabbit (W TN), Appalachian cottontail (Blue Ridge) snowshoe hare extirpated four incisors are clustered in two pairs, one behind the other sKull differences separate species in identification young are altricial, born blind and hairless [Hares are precocial]
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eu Non-Native Organism Risk Assessment Scheme
    EU NON-NATIVE SPECIES RISK ANALYSIS – RISK ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE V1.0 (8-06-16) EU NON-NATIVE ORGANISM RISK ASSESSMENT SCHEME Name of organism: Neovison vison Authors (alphabetical order): George Bouros, Jasja Dekker, Asun Gómez, Lauren A. Harrington, Zsolt Hegyeli, Calin Hodor, Kaarina Kauhala, Andreas Kranz, Erkki Korpimäki, Maurice La Haye, Xavier Lambin, David Macdonald, Sisco Mañas, Tiit Maran, Johan R. Michaux, Laura Moreno, Santiago Palazón, Madis Põdra, Pälvi Salo, Attila D. Sandor, Margarida Santos-Reis, Arnd Schreiber, Dan Traian Ionescu, Jiska van Dijk, Andrzej Zalewski, Iñigo Zuberogoitia Risk Assessment Area: European Union (28 Countries) Draft: 8/06/2016 1 EU NON-NATIVE SPECIES RISK ANALYSIS – RISK ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE V1.0 (8-06-16) EU CHAPEAU QUESTION RESPONSE 1. In how many EU member states has this species been recorded? List 24 countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, them. Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom. There is no American mink in Malta and information is not available from Bulgaria, Croatia and Cyprus (Macdonald & Harrington 2003, Bonesi & Palazón 2007, Dekker & Hofmeester 2014, Hegyeli & Kecskés 2014). In addition it is recorded in the non-member state Norway (The Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management 2011). American mink is kept also in fur farms almost all over Europe, in such countries as Germany, Denmark, Finland, Spain, Poland etc. (Kauhala 1996, Ruiz-Olmo et al 1997, Hammershoj et al 2005), though no longer in the United Kingdom. It is believed that keeping American mink as a pet is gaining popularity in some countries as well, for example in France (P.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores
    The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
    [Show full text]
  • American Mink Neovison Vison
    American mink Neovison vison Mink are an important part of the native wilderness of North America, and are regularly spotted along the Chicago River. Like many larger predators, it is a species that needs space if it is to thrive and coexist with humans. The mink is a member of the Mustelid family (which includes weasels, otters, wolverines, martens, badgers and ferrets). Historically, two species of mink were found in North America; however, the sea mink is now extinct. It lived exclusively along the Atlantic coast and had adapted to this habitat because of the abundant food (it preferred eating Labrador duck). The sea mink was hunted to extinction in the late 19th century. The surviving species, the American mink, lives in a wide range of habitats and is found throughout the United States and Canada except for Hawaii and the desert southwest. The American mink has been introduced in Europe where it is considered to be a pest and tends to displace the smaller European mink. The American mink lives in forested areas that are near rivers, lakes and marshes. The mink is very territorial and males will fight other minks that invade their territory. They are not fussy over their choice of den, as long as it’s close to water. They sometimes nest in burrows dug previously by muskrats, badgers or skunks. The American mink is carnivorous, feeding on rodents, fish, crustaceans, amphibians and even birds. In its natural range, fish are the mink’s primary prey. Mink inhabiting sloughs and marshes primarily target frogs, tadpoles, and mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela Fossils Using Linear
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2014 Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black- footed Ferret Conservation Nathaniel S. Fox III East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Nathaniel S. III, "Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black-footed Ferret Conservation" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2339. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2339 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black-footed Ferret Conservation _______________________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences _______________________________________ by Nathaniel S. Fox May 2014 _______________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Wallace, Chair Dr. Jim I. Mead Dr. Blaine W. Schubert Keywords: Mustela, weasels, morphometrics, classification, conservation, Pleistocene, Holocene ABSTRACT Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black-footed Ferret Conservation by Nathaniel S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Mammals Species List for Illinois
    Wild Mammals of Illinois Order Didelphimorphia Family Didelphidae Order Eulipotyphla Virginia opossum Didelphis virginiana Family Talpidae eastern mole Scalopus aquaticus Family Soricidae masked shrew Sorex cinereus American pygmy shrew Sorex hoyi southeastern shrew Sorex longirostris northern short-tailed shrew Blarina brevicauda southern short-tailed shrew Blarina carolinensis Cryptotis parvus Order Chiroptera North American least shrew Family Vespertilionidae southeastern bat Myotis austroriparius gray bat Myotis grisescens eastern small-footed bat Myotis leibii little brown bat Myotis lucifugus northern long-eared bat Myotis septentrionalis Indiana bat Myotis sodalis eastern red bat Lasiurus borealis hoary bat Aeorestes cinereus silver-haired bat Lasionycteris noctivagans tri-colored bat Perimyotis subflavus big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus evening bat Nycticeius humeralis Corynorhinus rafinesquii Order Cingulata Rafinesque’s big-eared bat Family Dasypodidae Dasypus novemcinctus Order Lagomorpha nine-banded armadillo Family Leporidae swamp rabbit Sylvilagus aquaticus Sylvilagus floridanus Order Rodentia eastern cottontail Family Sciuridae eastern chipmunk Tamias striatus woodchuck Marmota monax Franklin’s ground squirrel Spermophilus franklinii thirteen-lined ground squirrel Spermophilus tridecemlineatus eastern gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis eastern fox squirrel Sciurus niger red squirrel Tamiasciurus hudsonicus southern flying squirrel Glaucomys volans Family Geomyidae plains pocket gopher Geomys bursarius Family Castoridae American
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of Vermont Vermont Natural Heritage Inventory Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department 22 March 2017
    Mammals of Vermont Vermont Natural Heritage Inventory Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department 22 March 2017 The following is a list of mammal species known to regularly occur in Vermont. Historic species (not documented in Vermont in the last 25 years) are included if there is a reasonable expectation of their return. Not included are species that are extinct or extirpated from the state. The list is organized taxonomically to genus, then alphabetically within genus. Species not native to Vermont are indicated with an asterisk (*). Questions can be directed to the Vermont Natural Heritage Inventory, Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department, 1 National Life Drive, Montpelier, VT 05620-3702. (802) 241-3700. [email protected] State Global State Federal Scientific Name Common Name Rank Rank Status Status SGCN Didelphis virginiana Virginia Opossum S5 G5 Glaucomys sabrinus Northern Flying Squirrel S4 G5 SGCN Glaucomys volans Southern Flying Squirrel S5 G5 SGCN Marmota monax Woodchuck S5 G5 Sciurus carolinensis Eastern Gray Squirrel S5 G5 Tamias striatus Eastern Chipmunk S5 G5 Tamiasciurus hudsonicus Red Squirrel S5 G5 Castor canadensis American Beaver S5 G5 Napaeozapus insignis Woodland Jumping Mouse S5 G5 Zapus hudsonius Meadow Jumping Mouse S5 G5 Microtus chrotorrhinus Rock Vole S2 G4 SC SGCN Microtus pennsylvanicus Meadow Vole S5 G5 Microtus pinetorum Woodland Vole S3 G5 SGCN Myodes gapperi Southern Red-backed Vole S5 G5 Ondatra zibethicus Common Muskrat S5 G5 SGCN Peromyscus leucopus White-footed Deermouse S5 G5 Peromyscus maniculatus North
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York
    CHECKLIST OF AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES, BIRDS AND MAMMALS OF NEW YORK STATE Including Their Legal Status Eastern Milk Snake Moose Blue-spotted Salamander Common Loon New York State Artwork by Jean Gawalt Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish and Wildlife Page 1 of 30 February 2019 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Diversity Group 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233-4754 This web version is based upon an original hard copy version of Checklist of the Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York, Including Their Protective Status which was first published in 1985 and revised and reprinted in 1987. This version has had substantial revision in content and form. First printing - 1985 Second printing (rev.) - 1987 Third revision - 2001 Fourth revision - 2003 Fifth revision - 2005 Sixth revision - December 2005 Seventh revision - November 2006 Eighth revision - September 2007 Ninth revision - April 2010 Tenth revision – February 2019 Page 2 of 30 Introduction The following list of amphibians (34 species), reptiles (38), birds (474) and mammals (93) indicates those vertebrate species believed to be part of the fauna of New York and the present legal status of these species in New York State. Common and scientific nomenclature is as according to: Crother (2008) for amphibians and reptiles; the American Ornithologists' Union (1983 and 2009) for birds; and Wilson and Reeder (2005) for mammals. Expected occurrence in New York State is based on: Conant and Collins (1991) for amphibians and reptiles; Levine (1998) and the New York State Ornithological Association (2009) for birds; and New York State Museum records for terrestrial mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • How Selective Breeding Has Changed the Morphology of the American Mink (Neovison Vison)—A Comparative Analysis of Farm and Feral Animals
    animals Article How Selective Breeding Has Changed the Morphology of the American Mink (Neovison vison)—A Comparative Analysis of Farm and Feral Animals Anna Mucha 1, Magdalena Zato ´n-Dobrowolska 1,* , Magdalena Moska 1, Heliodor Wierzbicki 1 , Arkadiusz Dziech 1 , Dariusz Bukaci ´nski 2 and Monika Bukaci ´nska 2 1 Department of Genetics, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-631 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (H.W.); [email protected] (A.D.) 2 Institute of Biological Sciences, Cardinal Stefan Wyszy´nskiUniversity in Warsaw, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (M.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-71-320-5920 Simple Summary: Decades of selective breeding carried out on fur farms have changed the mor- phology, behavior and other features of the American mink, thereby differentiating farm and feral animals. The uniqueness of this situation is not only that we can observe how selective breeding phenotypically and genetically changes successive generations, but also that it enables a comparison of farm minks with their feral counterparts. Such a comparison may thus provide valuable infor- mation regarding differences in natural selection and selective breeding. In our study, we found significant morphological differences between farm and feral minks as well as changes in body shape: trapezoidal in feral minks and rectangular in farm minks. Such a clear differentiation between the two populations over a period of several decades highlights the intensity of selective breeding in Citation: Mucha, A.; shaping the morphology of these animals and gives an indication of the speed of phenotypic changes Zato´n-Dobrowolska, M.; Moska, M.; and the species’ plasticity.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Support for the Proposed Inclusion on the American Mink (Neovison Vison) on the List of Invasive Alien Species of Union Concern
    Statement of support for the proposed inclusion on the American mink (Neovison vison) on the list of Invasive Alien Species of Union Concern On behalf of the Fur Free Alliance (FFA), an international coalition of 40 animal protection organisations, I am writing with regard to the proposed inclusion of the American mink on the List of Invasive Alien Species of Union Concern. The FFA strongly supports the inclusion of the American mink on this list given that it is one of the most invasive alien mammal species present in Europe and decisive action is necessary to prevent the further spread of the species and to protect biodiversity. Below we outline why we believe that American mink should be listed. Impact of the American mink on biodiversity The American mink was first introduced to Europe for the purposes of fur production during the 1920s. Feral populations of American mink, which have become established as a result of animals escaping or being deliberately released from fur farms, are widespread and abundant in Europe. The species is now believed to be present in most EU Member States. American mink is an invasive mammal species, which has a significant impact on native fauna in Europe, affecting at least 47 native species negatively. 1 Through competition for resources, the American mink has been implicated in the displacement of the European mink and European polecat.2 In the UK, predation by the American mink has been identified as the main cause for the near extinction of the water vole.3 Local studies across Europe have shown that the American mink can have a significant impact on ground-nesting bird populations, rodents and amphibians.4 To prevent further damage to native biodiversity a number of EU Member States have already implemented preventive measures to avoid new introductions and the further expansion of feral American mink.
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence of Wild-Living American Mink Neovison Vison in Transylvania, Romania
    The occurrence of wild-living American Mink Neovison vison in Transylvania, Romania Zsolt HEGYELI* and Attila KECSKÉS Abstract American Mink Neovison vison is a common wild-living alien species across most of northern Europe, but few data are available about wild presence in Eastern Europe. Field observations and collected specimens from the last 25 years indicate wild-living which existed in the area. Earlier observations suggested only the presence of escapees; more recent records might imply the existenceAmerican ofMink wild along populations. the River Part Mureș of the in studyTransylvania, area held Romania. European These Mink are Mustela likely lutreolato have untiloriginated at least from the fur1990s. farms, This three highly of threatened species might still occur there. The presence of the alien species might reduce its chances of survival. Keywords: alien species, European Mink, fur farms, Mustela lutreola Vadon élő amerikai nyércek Neovison vison előfordulása, mustelids, Erdélyben River Mureș (Románia) Kivonat Az amerikai nyérc Neovison vison - gyakori idegenhonos faj Európa északi felének nagy részén, viszont vadon élő állományainak kelet-európai előfordulásáról csekély számú adat áll rendelkezésre. Az elmúlt 25 évben a Maros folyó mentéről (Erdély, Romá nia) származó terepi megfigyelések valamint begyűjtött példányok arra utalnak, hogy a térségben előfordulnak a faj vadon élő egyedei. Ezen példányok minden bizonnyal szőrmefarmokról származtak, amelyekből a vizsgált területen korábbanMustela három lutreola is működött. Míg a korábbi megfigyelések csupán farmi szökevények előfordulását sugallták, az újabb adatok valószínűsítik egy vadon élő állomány itteni jelenlétét. A vizsgált terület egy része a fokozottan veszélyeztetett európai nyércnek is otthont adott legalább az 1990-es évekig, és az sem kizárt, hogy az őshonos menyétféle napjainkig is fennmaradt itt, utóbbi esetben viszont az idegenhonos amerikai nyérc itteni jelenléte komolyan veszélyeztetheti e faj túlélését.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mammals of North Carolina
    THE MAMMALS OF NORTH CAROLINA SECOND APPROXIMATION Harry E. LeGrand, Jr. (Species Accounts) Thomas E. Howard, Jr. (Website Administrator) May 2017 This material is the second approximation account of the species of mammals of North Carolina. It is not considered to be a "publication". It is intended to be a guide or "handbook" for mammal enthusiasts, as there is no recent published book on the county distribution of mammals in North Carolina. Much of the distribution information is based on data gathered at the N.C. Museum of Natural Sciences and published as “A Distributional Survey of North Carolina Mammals”, by Lee, Funderburg, and Clark, in 1982 (see Suggested References). Since then, the other major publication on mammals in North Carolina was “Mammals of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Maryland”, by Webster, Parnell, and Biggs (1985). As can be seen from the dates of the above publications, there has been a lack of information on the distribution and abundance of the mammals in the state over the last 32 years. There have been a number of field guides and reference books published in the past decade – e.g., Whitaker and Hamilton 1998; Bowers et al., 2004; Reid 2006; Kays and Wilson 2009 -- with range maps, but these are for the entire mammal fauna over the eastern half of the continent or the entire continent, and the range maps are small and with generalized shaded colors. The junior author (Tom Howard) has already created three other websites on the distribution of the fauna of selected taxonomic groups in North Carolina, and the senior author (LeGrand) has written text for the species accounts; these groups are the Birds, Butterflies, and Odonates (Dragonflies and Damselflies).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Hickory Nut Gorge Green Salamander (Aneides caryaensis) Photo by Austin Patton 2014 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]