DOCSLIB.ORG

'Legal Highs' the Challenge of New Psychoactive Substances

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'Legal Highs' the Challenge of New Psychoactive Substances Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies Nr. 16 October 2011 ‘Legal highs’ The challenge of new psychoactive substances By Adam Winstock1 and Chris Wilkins2 This paper aims to set out some of the pol- icy and public health issues raised by the appearance of a wide range of emergent psychoactive substances of diverse origin, effect and risk profile (commonly referred to as ‘legal highs’). It will start by considering what is meant by the term ‘legal highs’ and consider the his- torical context that has framed their appear- ance and must inform any response. It will then consider some of the approaches that KEY POINTS have been adopted by different nations to Evidence shows that alternatives to control their availability and associated criminalisation exist that attain many harms, including a preliminary assessment desirable outcomes for governments, whilst of their consequences, both intended and minimising the unnecessary consequences not. of criminalising the individual user. To date, the approaches to regulation have While new psychoactive substances pose varied between nations, both with respect a challenge to existing drug control re- to the nature and specificity of the meas- gimes, their appearance provides an oppor- ures taken and their intended outcome. tunity to consider the trial of alternative Such diversity appropriately reflects the policy and legislative approaches to drug marked differences in the existing drug use control. problems and public health approaches to addressing such issues between nations. An objective evaluation based upon scientific evidence is required to evaluate WHAT IS A LEGAL HIGH? the utility of these different control options, as well as their impact on public Over the last decade the term ‘legal high’ health outcomes. has become an accepted addition to media parlance and a lay reference point for dis- Policy makers should not only reflect on cussion among the general public in their the unintended consequences of drug consideration of issues related to drug use. prohibition but also the current and his- However, when critically considered, the torical failures of the adequate regulation of term is often misleading and factually in- the legal markets for alcohol and tobacco, accurate. ‘Legal high’ is a catch term that and for pharmaceuticals. Legislative Reform of Drug Policies | 1 has historically referred to a diverse group and/or manufacture have the explicit aim of naturally occurring and novel synthetic of circumventing legislative restrictions is a compounds whose consumption results in recent phenomenon, the truth is many have widely differing effect and risk profiles.3 been available for several decades. What They have also been variously referred to as has changed is not only the diversity and ‘designer drugs’, ‘herbal highs’, ‘synthetic potency of the products but their wide- drugs’ and more recently ‘research chemi- spread promotion and distribution not cals’. only through the internet and expected suppliers such as “head-shops” but also Because the definition is so broad and the local corner shops, grocery and DVD rental legal status (and availability) of the sub- stores. The development of global web- stances are constantly changing, there is no based marketing and distribution distinct definitive list of legal highs. Substances from illicit street markets seriously limits which have at one time or another been the utility of existing supply reduction considered to fall under this term have strategies.8 Taken in combination with the included traditional plant-based products, rapid increase in openly public marketing often with a long and culturally sanctioned nations, politicians and legislators have history of human consumption, such as been forced to reflect upon and update herbs (e.g. salvia divinorum and kratom), their responses. seeds (e.g. baby Hawaiian woodrose), fungi (e.g. magic mushrooms, fly agaric) and By lumping substances with diverse effect cacti (e.g. peyote). More recently these and risk profiles that appear at different ‘ethnobotanicals’ have been joined by a diz- points in time together, policy makers find zying array of new synthetic compounds themselves in the unenviable position of including the cannabinoid receptor agonists being pressured to make quick decisions (such as JHW-018 and others found in about the risks of harm often based on no herbal smoking blends such as the ‘Spice’ more than unverified media speculation products),4 cathinones (such as mephedro- and uncertain extrapolation from scientific ne, 4-methylmethcathionine)5 and the knowledge on related chemical structures. piperazines (such as benzylpiperazine Although the precautionary principal is (BZP).6 used to support pre-emptive legislative control, the reality is that while such The increase in notifications of new psy- actions may remove harmful substances choactive substances to the European from widespread circulation they are rapid- Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug ly replaced by other equally unfamiliar Addiction (EMCDDA) has risen from an molecules that may or may not share a average of five per year between 2000 and similar risk effect and risk profile. 2005 to over 40 in 2010.7 The number of new classes of untested drugs and varia- Such substances like their predecessors tions on molecular structure that may be “parachute” into communities bypassing waiting in various laboratories around the traditional social networks that often pro- world is daunting. In the UK alone, the last vided some opportunity for people to learn two years has seen more than five separate about a new drug in close proximity to additions totalling more than 50 different friends. Thus when considering which compounds to the Misuse of Drugs Act. approach to supply control is most effective This represents more legislative additions with respect to these new substances, it is than in the last two decades put together. worth reflecting upon what gains are made and what potential avenues for optimising While recent media and policy interest may public health are lost when control through suggest that the idea of promoting sub- drug legislation is adopted as opposed to stances whose development, rediscovery other forms of supply control. 2 | Legislative Reform of Drug Policies THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT WITHIN which could be used both as substitutes for WHICH THESE DRUGS HAVE APPEARED MDMA in ecstasy pills and also for sale in their own right. This shift in what is being As noted above psychoactive substances produced has been accompanied by a shift that avoid regulation have been promoted, in the location of manufacture from Europe developed and marketed for decades. What to other regions, notably South East Asia14 has changed in recent years has not only and the burgeoning economies of India and been their diversity and potency but per- China with relatively poorly regulated haps most importantly the globalisation of control mechanisms. drug markets through the internet – truly a drug market without borders. The opening Why the UK in particular may have been up of the global market place has coincided such a ripe market for emergent synthetic with a significant disruption in the interna- drugs such as mephedrone in uncertain. It tional supply of MDMA over recent years. may have had something to do with the fact that the marked reduction in the availabil- The decline in the supply of MDMA is ity of MDMA coincided with a sharp fall in thought to be largely the result of global the purity of cocaine.15 Taken together, dis- disruptions to the illicit supply of key satisfaction with the existing illicit market MDMA precursor chemicals.9 Pharma- would have set the appropriate (receptive cological analysis of so called ‘ecstasy’ pills and cash rich) market conditions for syn- in a number of countries around the world thetic stimulants such as the cathinones has revealed they often contain substances and piperazines.16 With subjective effects other than, or in addition to, MDMA in- similar to MDMA and cocaine17 it is of note cluding caffeine, methamphetamine, that evidence from the Netherlands sug- piperazines and sometimes ketamine.10 Up gests that mephedrone has found its way to half of ‘ecstasy’ seizures made in the into tablets being sold as MDMA.18 Netherlands in 2009 were found to contain no MDMA; rather the pills contained It may also be possible that users chose mCPP (meta-Chlorophenylpiperazine) and these substances because they considered mephedrone (methylmethcathinone) or them better value for money and a more another psychoactive substance.11 consistent product.19 The wide availability and promotion of synthetic cannabinoids These findings are mirrored by user reports has not, however, occurred in such a qual- on the perceived quality of ecstasy pills. In ity vacuum, with high quality cannabis the 2009/10 Mixmag Survey, 76% of almost being widely available across Europe. One 2000 users believed that the quality of might speculate that decades of health pro- MDMA pills had reduced, with 68% report- motion, warning of the risks of traditional 12 ing a decline in 2010/11. Further afield in illicit drugs including cannabis has perhaps New Zealand, ‘ecstasy’ tablets seized by the encouraged some to seek alternative canna- authorities have also been found to contain bis preparations. BZP (benzylpiperazine), MDPV (methyl- enedioxypurovalerone), mephedrone and Certainly, legal high producers have ex- methylone (methylenedioxymethcathi- ploited health and product quality concerns none).13 Taken in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Ecstasy” Tablets
    Department of Alcohol & OSAM-O-GRAM Drug Addiction Services Wright State University Dateline: Ohio June 2008-January 2009 Statewide reports of piperazines in adulterated “Ecstasy” tablets Increases in Piperazine Availability surfaced in northeast Ohio, “We did just see one with mCPP, but In January 2008, the OSAM Network received initial reports that’s not as popular as BZP. The informant who brought it was told it was from crime lab professionals of piperazine-containing pressed ‘Triple E’ or ‘Super Ecstasy’ by the dealer. Most of the tablets don’t look tablets that appeared to be sold as Ecstasy. One year later, any different than Ecstasy but we did find one micro tablet, which was half availability of pressed tablets containing piperazines has the size of a normal Ecstasy tablet and it ended up being mCPP.” A lab drastically increased throughout the state (Table below). in the central Ohio area reported most of the pressed tablets Piperazine cases now outnumber the cases of MDMA- analyzed there contain polydrug combinations, “The most common containing Ecstasy tablets analyzed by crime labs across Ohio. combination in our lab is BZP/TFMPP/MDMA/Methamphetamine. A crime lab professional from the central Ohio area said, “We In the last year, only seven cases have been BZP alone.” analyzed our first benzylpiperazine cases in January 2008, and it’s been fairly steady since that time.” Piperazines vs. Ecstasy(MDMA) Crime lab professionals reported piperazines are indistinguishable Table 1: Availability of piperazine tablets according to crime from traditional Ecstasy tablets. A crime lab professional from lab professionals the northwest Ohio area noted, “Most lab chemists would tell you just Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Party Pills and Their Use by Young People in New Zealand: a Qualitative Study
    LEGAL PARTY PILLS AND THEIR USE BY YOUNG PEOPLE IN NEW ZEALAND: A QUALITATIVE STUDY FINAL REPORT OF FINDINGS First submitted December 2006 Revised June 2007 Janie Sheridan, PhD MRPharmS, MPS(NZ), BPharm(Hons), BA(Hons) Rachael Butler, BA The School of Pharmacy The University of Auckland New Zealand i Suggested citation: Sheridan, J. & Butler, R. (2007) Legal party pills and their use by young people in New Zealand: a qualitative study. Final report of findings (revised June 2007). University of Auckland: Auckland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................. v Glossary................................................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary of Results............................................................................................. vii 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Structure of this report .........................................................................................1 1.2 Background literature...........................................................................................1 1.3 Rationale for researching young people’s use of party pills................................4 2.0 Study Aims ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 Methods
    [Show full text]
  • Misuse of Drugs Act 1975
    Reprint as at 1 July 2014 Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 Public Act 1975 No 116 Date of assent 10 October 1975 Commencement see section 1(2) Contents Page Title 4 1 Short Title and commencement 4 2 Interpretation 4 3 Act to bind the Crown 9 3A Classification of drugs 9 4 Amendment of schedules that identify controlled drugs 10 and precursor substances, and set amount, level, or quantity at and over which controlled drugs are presumed to be for supply 4A Procedure for bringing Order in Council made under 12 section 4(1) or (1B) into force 4B Matters to which Minister must have regard before 13 recommending Order in Council under section 4(1) or (1B) 4C Temporary class drug notice [Repealed] 14 4D Effect of temporary class drug notice [Repealed] 15 4E Duration of temporary class drug notice [Repealed] 15 Note Changes authorised by subpart 2 of Part 2 of the Legislation Act 2012 have been made in this official reprint. Note 4 at the end of this reprint provides a list of the amendments incorporated. This Act is administered by the Ministry of Health. 1 Reprinted as at Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 1 July 2014 5 Advisory and technical committees 15 5AA Expert Advisory Committee on Drugs 15 5A Approved laboratories 17 5B Functions of Minister 17 6 Dealing with controlled drugs 18 7 Possession and use of controlled drugs 20 8 Exemptions from sections 6 and 7 22 9 Cultivation of prohibited plants 26 10 Aiding offences against corresponding law of another 27 country 11 Theft, etc, of controlled drugs 28 12 Use of premises or vehicle, etc 29 12A Equipment,
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2018
    104 INCB REPORT 2018 816. The lack of data related to drug trafficking and abuse in the region, other than for Australia and New Zealand, coupled with the fact that many countries have not yet become parties to the drug control treaties, is a matter of great concern to the Board. The Board has con- ducted bilateral meetings with the Governments of Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands to address those issues and has followed up with the Governments of all non- States parties to one or more of the international drug control conventions in the region. In that connection, the ­ ­ Board was informed that the authorities of Papua New Guinea were to commence the national process of adher- ing to the 1988 Convention in September 2018. 2. Regional cooperation 817. The Oceania Customs Organization84 held its twen- tieth annual conference, on the theme “Strengthening regional connections to support a safe and prosperous Pacific”, in Melbourne, Australia, from 11 to 14 June 2018. During the meeting, customs administrations from the 23 members signed a memorandum of understanding on customs cooperation to facilitate the exchange of infor- mation between relevant border security agencies. E. Oceania Members endorsed the re-establishment of the Information Working Group and the progression of the Small Craft Mobile Application Project, developed by Australia, to 1. Major developments phase 3 as of July 2018. The members also endorsed the signing the Declaration of Partnership between the Pacific 814. Oceania continues to be vulnerable to drug manu­ Islands Chiefs of Police, the Pacific Immigration facturing and drug and precursor trafficking.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Drug Trends 2014
    EMERGING DRUG TRENDS – 2014 Special Research Report • Regional Organized Crime Information Center Emerging Drug Trends Table of Contents Opioid Abuse .................................................... 2 By ROCIC Publications Specialist Jennifer Adkins Opiate Abuse .................................................... 7 © Regional Organized Crime Information Center Synthetic Cathinones ..................................... 13 ew drugs are emerging at an unprecedented rate as manufacturers Synthetic Cannabinoids ................................. 18 of “legal high” products use new chemicals to replace those that Phenethlyamines ............................................ 22 N Party Pills ...................................................27 are banned. These new chemicals take the place of heroin, morphine, and amphetamines. These drugs are highly accessible, touted as legal, Herbal Drugs ..............................................29 Sources of Information ...............................32 and perceived as safe. This Special Research Report was supported by Grant No. 2011-RS-CX-K007, awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. However, despite the popularity in designer drugs and legal high Department of Justice. The Office of Justice Programs also coordinates the activi- ties of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of products, the abuse of heroin and prescription painkiller medication Juvenile Justice and Delinquency, and the Office for Victims of Crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Drug Checking Services
    IN CONFIDENCE In Confidence Office of the Minister of Health Cabinet Social Wellbeing Committee Regulation of drug checking services Proposal 1 This paper seeks agreement to amend the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 and the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 to enable a permanent system of regulation for drug checking service providers. Relation to government priorities 2 This proposal does not relate to a Government priority. Executive Summary 3 Drug checking services check the composition of illicit drugs and provide harm reduction advice to help individuals make informed decisions about drug use. Where a drug is not as presumed, the individual can make the potentially life-saving decision not to consume it. 4 Drug checking is currently regulated under amendmentsreleased made by the Drug and Substance Checking Legislation Act 2020 (the Drug Checking Act) to the Misuse of Drugs Act and the Psychoactive Substances Act. These amendments allow appointed drug checking service providers to operate with legal certainty. 5 The Drug Checking Act was always intended to be temporary legislation to allow time for a permanent licensing system to be developed. The Drug Checking Act includes mechanisms which will repeal the amendments to the Misuse of Drugs Act and the Psychoactive Substances Act in December 2021. 6 If a permanent system is not in place when the Drug Checking Act repeal provisions take effect, drug checking will revert to a legal grey area. This would impede service provision and make it more difficult to prevent harm from dangerous substances such as synthetic cathinones (sometimes known as “bath salts”). Regulation is required to enable good quality services and to prevent low-quality service providers from operating.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Paper: New Zealand's Psychoactive Substances Legislation
    IDPC/NZDF Briefing Paper New Zealand’s psychoactive substances legislation Catherine McCullough,1 Jackson Wood2 and Rob Zorn3 September 2013 This briefing paper was written in collaboration with the New Zealand Drug Foundation continues a long history of New Zealanders making Introduction the most of available resources to create substitutes for drugs that are unavailable. As with many western countries, New Zealand’s drug laws are out of date and are causing more It is fitting then, that New Zealand has become the harm than was originally intended. The laws carry first country to pass legislation that seeks to the shadow of a prohibitionist past, have failed to regulate NPS to ensure they are low risk, rather keep up with innovations in drug production and than to control them through prohibition and supply and do not relate well to modern punitive measures. understandings of harm reduction and health The Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 has been protection. generally well-received by politicians, the ‘legal The challenge of Benzylpiperazine (BZP) ‘party pills’ high’ industry and the public. It is also receiving in the late 1990s and early 2000s made deficiencies considerable attention from like-minded in New Zealand’s drug law abundantly clear. No jurisdictions around the world. framework for controlling BZP and other party pills As we shall see, if is far from a perfect or final could be found within existing laws and solution, but it bodes extremely well for future regulations. An endless cat and mouse game began drug policy development and reform, both here between the Government and the ‘legal high’ and overseas.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2010
    Chapter III. Analysis of the world situation in 2008 were reported to involve more than one concerned, such as Cook Islands, Kiribati, the Marshall substance. Islands, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu and Vanuatu, to accede to the international drug control treaties without further delay E. Oceania and to strengthen national legislation and border control. 1. Major developments 758. In Australia, traffickers are increasingly using the 2. Regional cooperation Internet to obtain not only precursor chemicals but also 761. Regional meetings in Oceania continued to play equipment used for the illicit manufacture of drugs. an important role in bringing countries together to Recently, the Australian customs authorities launched address drug control issues. At the twenty-eighth an operation to monitor importation from Internet annual meeting of the Pacific Islands Law Officers’ pharmacies based overseas. The operation dismantled Network, held in Samoa in December 2009, an organized criminal group that ordered participants highlighted the need for States in the pharmaceutical products containing pseudoephedrine region that were not yet parties to the international from overseas-based Internet pharmacies, with the drug control treaties to ratify those instruments. The intention of reselling them to illicit drug annual meeting of the Regional Security Committee of manufacturers. the Pacific Islands Forum was held in Fiji in 759. The Government of New Zealand has given high June 2010. The issue of transnational crime, including priority to the fight against the illicit manufacture and trafficking in drugs and precursors, remained high on abuse of methamphetamine. The national action plan the agenda. There was consensus among participants to tackle illicit manufacture and abuse of that the region remained vulnerable to threats posed by methamphetamine, launched in October 2009, has led transnational crime and that countries in the region to the identification of new trafficking trends, the must respond collectively and promptly.
    [Show full text]
  • Erds) for Health Care Practitioners
    E. Silins, J. Copeland, P. Dillon, I. McGregor & D. Caldicott The development of materials on ecstasy and related drugs (ERDs) for health care practitioners NDARC Technical Report No. 287 THE DEVELOPMENT OF MATERIALS ON ECSTASY AND RELATED DRUGS (ERDS) FOR HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONERS Edmund Silins, Jan Copeland, Paul Dillon, Iain McGregor and David Caldicott Technical Report Number 287 ISBN: 978 0 7334 2536 3 ©NATIONAL DRUG AND ALCOHOL RESEARCH CENTRE, UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES, SYDNEY, 2007 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. All other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the information manager, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................ iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................iv ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................................v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................vi 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................1 1.1 Patterns of drug
    [Show full text]
  • Misuse of Drugs Amendment Bill
    Misuse of Drugs Amendment Bill 11/04/2019 Submission on the Misuse of Drugs Amendment Bill 1 Introduction 1.1 The New Zealand Law Society welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Misuse of Drugs Amendment Bill 2019 (the Bill). 1.1 The Bill amends the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 (the Act) by: (a) classifying two synthetic cannabinoids (5F-ADB and AMB-FUBINACA) as Class A controlled drugs; (b) affirming the existing Police discretion not to prosecute for possession and use (for all drugs) where a health-centred or therapeutic approach would be more beneficial; and (c) introducing a power for the Minister of Health to issue temporary (12 month) drug notices which classify new substances as Class C controlled drugs. 2 Executive summary 2.1 The Law Society’s key submissions are that: (a) The truncated process for development and scrutiny of the Bill creates a risk of poor quality regulation. (b) The Ministry of Justice’s view that there is no inconsistency with section 25(c) of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law) requires further examination. That view is difficult to reconcile with: (i) previous negative section 7 reports by Attorneys-General relating to previous amendments to the Act concerning similar thresholds for the presumption of possession for the purpose of supply; and (ii) case law. 2.1 We also comment on whether there is sufficient evidence to establish the correct level at which the presumption of supply should apply, and whether the 56 gram threshold for presumption of supply applies to powder, liquid or plant weight.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigate the Dopaminergic Neurotoxicity Profile of Designer Drugs (Piperazine Derivatives) by Mohammed Almaghrabi a Thesis Su
    Investigate the dopaminergic neurotoxicity profile of designer drugs (Piperazine derivatives) by Mohammed Almaghrabi A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama 8/4/2018 Keywords: designer drugs, N27 cell, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, neurotoxicity Copyright 2018 by Mohammed Almaghrabi Approved by Muralikrishnan Dhanasekaran, Co-chair, Professor of Pharmacology Randall Clark, Co-chair, Professor of Medicinal Chemistry Jack Deruiter, Professor of Medicinal Chemistry Vishnu Suppiramaniam, Professor of Pharmacology Abstract Different botanical derived, or synthetic addictive substances have been “misused” and/or “abused” for centuries around the world. To overcome the abuse by these substances, strict legal laws were constituted globally. However, novel and drugs with chemical structures similar to illegal psychoactive drugs substances (with a slight structural change) were manufactured in undercover laboratories to have the same or augmented psychostimulatory effects. Currently, the major classes of designer drugs are piperazines, cathinones, synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic opioids, tryptamines, and phenethylamines. These classes of designer drugs have shown to elicit significant psychostimulatory effect by a different mechanism of action. There are very few reports on the dopaminergic neurotoxicity of piperazine derivatives. However, they have shown to affect various monoaminergic neurotransmission. In the current study, we have synthesized and elucidated the neurotoxic mechanisms of new piperazines. ii Acknowledgments In the name of Alláh, the most Gracious, and the most merciful, I praise him for his reconcile and guidance. Behind this work a lot of supportive people who helped and encourage me to achieve this step of education. First, I would like to thank my advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmaps to Regulation: New Psychoactive Substances (Nps)
    : ROADMAPS TO REGULATION: NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES (NPS) Authors Amanda Feilding and Nicola Singleton Our sincere thanks to the John Paul Getty Jr. Foundation who were the main funders for the report Roadmaps to Regulation: Cannabis, Psychedelics, MDMA, and NPS, and to the Open Society Foundations (OSF), for their supplementary financial support towards this publication. Beckley Park, Oxford OX3 9SY. United Kingdom www.beckleyfoundation.org THE AIM OF THE REPORT This publication is a chapter from a four-part report, Roadmaps to Regulation: Cannabis, Psychedelics, MDMA, and NPS, that will be published later this year. The report was convened by Amanda Feilding, and principally funded by the John Paul Getty Jr. Foundation with further assistance from the Open Society Foundations (OSF). The report aims to bring together the best available evidence on the regulation of psychoactive drugs in a rigorous, yet accessible way. In part, it is an invitation to think differently about drug policy options. The wealth of expertise that we have gained from our work in the drug policy field strengthens our conviction that the strict legal regulation of drugs is the ultimate goal of drug policy reform. The governments of the world, duty-bound to safeguard their citizens’ well-being, surely would do a better job of minimising the overall harms of drugs than the criminal organisations currently profiting from the illicit market. It is no longer acceptable to simply assume that the risks of a legal market will exceed those of prohibition, especially when there is already the beginnings of a scientific evidence-base to show that a regulated market can provide effective ways of reducing harms.
    [Show full text]