Control of Algae in Fuel Storage Ponds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The University of Manchester Control of Algae in Fuel Storage Ponds A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Engineering in the Faculty of Science and Engineering 2019 Julija Konovalovaite School of Earth and Environmental Sciences 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................... 2 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 List of tables ............................................................................................................ 12 List of images .......................................................................................................... 13 Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 15 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 17 Declaration ................................................................................................................. 19 Copyright statement .................................................................................................. 20 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... 21 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 23 1.1 Project context and relevance to the industry .......................................... 23 1.2 Magnox reactor fuel cycle .......................................................................... 25 1.2.1 Spent Magnox fuel storage .................................................................... 25 1.3 The First Generation Magnox Fuel Storage pond ...................................... 26 1.3.1 History of the pond ................................................................................ 26 1.3.2 Structure and processes ......................................................................... 27 1.3.3 Conditions in the pond ........................................................................... 28 1.3.4 Pond simulant medium .......................................................................... 31 1.4 Studies of microbial diversity in First Generation Magnox Storage Pond . 33 1.5 Cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena catenata ............................................... 34 1.5.1 Cyanobacteria ........................................................................................ 34 1.5.2 Pseudanabaena catenata ...................................................................... 37 1.6 Unwanted algal growth treatment methods ............................................. 39 1.6.1 Nutrient removal .................................................................................... 39 1.6.2 Sonication ............................................................................................... 40 2 1.6.3 Photocatalysts ........................................................................................ 42 1.6.4 Oxidation ................................................................................................ 42 1.6.5 Halogenation .......................................................................................... 44 1.6.6 Coagulation ............................................................................................ 45 1.6.7 Filtration ................................................................................................. 46 1.6.8 Electrochemical methods ....................................................................... 47 1.6.9 Barley Straw ........................................................................................... 48 1.6.10 Biofilm removal .................................................................................. 49 1.6.11 Flushing .............................................................................................. 50 1.6.12 Biocides .............................................................................................. 50 1.6.13 Selection of appropriate methods for bloom control........................ 52 1.7 Rig development ........................................................................................ 55 1.8 Research objectives.................................................................................... 57 2 Algal growth in batch cultures ............................................................................ 58 2.1 Abstract ...................................................................................................... 58 2.2 Literature review ........................................................................................ 58 2.2.1 Cyanobacterial adaptations to micro and macro nutrient availability .. 58 2.2.2 Adaptations to highly alkaline conditions .............................................. 62 2.2.3 Pseudanabaena catenata ...................................................................... 63 2.3 Aims of batch culture experiments ............................................................ 67 2.4 Materials and methods .............................................................................. 68 2.4.1 Algal culture ........................................................................................... 68 2.4.2 Effect of reduced inorganic nutrient concentrations: initial experiments 69 2.4.3 Reduced inorganic nutrients- variation in sodium acetate supplements 69 3 2.4.4 Buffered pH experiments ....................................................................... 70 2.4.5 Progressive reduction in inorganic nutrient concentrations ................. 71 2.5 Results and discussion................................................................................ 73 2.5.1 Impact of nutrient availability ................................................................ 73 2.5.2 Pond water simulation experiment: addition of a carbon source ......... 77 2.5.3 Impact of organic carbon availability at reduced inorganic nutrient concentrations .................................................................................................... 83 2.5.4 Buffered pH experiment ........................................................................ 86 2.5.5 Growth of P. catenata at progressively reduced inorganic nutrient concentrations .................................................................................................... 88 2.6 Conclusions .............................................................................................. 101 3 Continuous culture flushing experiments ........................................................ 102 3.1 Abstract .................................................................................................... 102 3.2 Literature review ...................................................................................... 102 3.3 Aims of continuous culture experiments ................................................. 105 3.4 Materials and methods ............................................................................ 106 3.4.1 Continuous culture experiments ......................................................... 106 3.4.2 Cell counting ......................................................................................... 107 3.4.3 Continuous culture: reduced inorganic nutrients ................................ 108 3.4.4 Total inorganic carbon / Total organic carbon ..................................... 108 3.5 Results and discussion.............................................................................. 110 3.5.1 Continuous culture experiment flushed with BG11 medium .............. 110 3.5.2 Repeated continuous culture experiment ........................................... 116 3.5.3 Low nutrient flushing experiment ....................................................... 120 3.5.4 Repeated low nutrient experiment ..................................................... 127 3.5.5 Growth rate analysis in continuous cultures ....................................... 130 4 3.6 Conclusions .............................................................................................. 133 4 Biocide addition experiments ........................................................................... 134 4.1 Abstract .................................................................................................... 134 4.2 Literature review ...................................................................................... 134 4.3 Aims .......................................................................................................... 136 4.4 Materials and methods ............................................................................ 137 4.4.1 Mexel® 432 experiment ....................................................................... 137 4.4.2 Spectrus ® NX1422 biocide trial ........................................................... 140 4.4.3 Repeated experiment .......................................................................... 143 4.5 Conclusions .............................................................................................. 150 5 Prokaryote species succession.......................................................................... 151 5.1 Abstract .................................................................................................... 151 5.2 Literature review .....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • EMBRIC (Grant Agreement No

    EMBRIC (Grant Agreement No

    Deliverable D6.1 EMBRIC (Grant Agreement No. 654008) Grant Agreement Number: 654008 EMBRIC European Marine Biological Research Infrastructure Cluster to promote the Blue Bioeconomy Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020), H2020-INFRADEV-1-2014-1 Start Date of Project: 01.06.2015 Duration: 48 Months Deliverable D6.1 EMBRIC showcases: prototype pipelines from the microorganism to product discovery (M36) HORIZON 2020 - INFRADEV Deliverable D6.1 EMBRIC showcases: prototype pipelines from the microorganism to product discovery Page 1 of 85 Deliverable D6.1 EMBRIC (Grant Agreement No. 654008) Implementation and operation of cross-cutting services and solutions for clusters of ESFRI Grant agreement no.: 654008 Project acronym: EMBRIC Project website: www.embric.eu Project full title: European Marine Biological Research Infrastructure cluster to promote the Bioeconomy Project start date: June 2015 (48 months) Submission due date : May 2018 Actual submission date: May 2018 Work Package: WP 6 Microbial pipeline from environment to active compounds Lead Beneficiary: CABI Version: 9.0 Authors: SMITH David GOSS Rebecca OVERMANN Jörg BRÖNSTRUP Mark PASCUAL Javier BAJERSKI Felizitas HENSLER Michael WANG Yunpeng ABRAHAM Emily Deliverable D6.1 EMBRIC showcases: prototype pipelines from the microorganism to product discovery Page 2 of 85 Deliverable D6.1 EMBRIC (Grant Agreement No. 654008) Project funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (2015-2019) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission X Services Deliverable D6.1 EMBRIC showcases: prototype pipelines from the microorganism to product discovery Page 3 of 85 Deliverable D6.1 EMBRIC (Grant Agreement No.
  • D 6.1 EMBRIC Showcases

    D 6.1 EMBRIC Showcases

    Grant Agreement Number: 654008 EMBRIC European Marine Biological Research Infrastructure Cluster to promote the Blue Bioeconomy Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020), H2020-INFRADEV-1-2014-1 Start Date of Project: 01.06.2015 Duration: 48 Months Deliverable D6.1 b EMBRIC showcases: prototype pipelines from the microorganism to product discovery (Revised 2019) HORIZON 2020 - INFRADEV Implementation and operation of cross-cutting services and solutions for clusters of ESFRI 1 Grant agreement no.: 654008 Project acronym: EMBRIC Project website: www.embric.eu Project full title: European Marine Biological Research Infrastructure cluster to promote the Bioeconomy (Revised 2019) Project start date: June 2015 (48 months) Submission due date: May 2019 Actual submission date: Apr 2019 Work Package: WP 6 Microbial pipeline from environment to active compounds Lead Beneficiary: CABI [Partner 15] Version: 1.0 Authors: SMITH David [CABI Partner 15] GOSS Rebecca [USTAN 10] OVERMANN Jörg [DSMZ Partner 24] BRÖNSTRUP Mark [HZI Partner 18] PASCUAL Javier [DSMZ Partner 24] BAJERSKI Felizitas [DSMZ Partner 24] HENSLER Michael [HZI Partner 18] WANG Yunpeng [USTAN Partner 10] ABRAHAM Emily [USTAN Partner 10] FIORINI Federica [HZI Partner 18] Project funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (2015-2019) Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services 2 Abstract Deliverable D6.1b replaces Deliverable 6.1 EMBRIC showcases: prototype pipelines from the microorganism to product discovery with the specific goal to refine technologies used but more specifically deliver results of the microbial discovery pipeline.
  • Microbial Degradation of Organic Micropollutants in Hyporheic Zone Sediments

    Microbial Degradation of Organic Micropollutants in Hyporheic Zone Sediments

    Microbial degradation of organic micropollutants in hyporheic zone sediments Dissertation To obtain the Academic Degree Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) Submitted to the Faculty of Biology, Chemistry, and Geosciences of the University of Bayreuth by Cyrus Rutere Bayreuth, May 2020 This doctoral thesis was prepared at the Department of Ecological Microbiology – University of Bayreuth and AG Horn – Institute of Microbiology, Leibniz University Hannover, from August 2015 until April 2020, and was supervised by Prof. Dr. Marcus. A. Horn. This is a full reprint of the dissertation submitted to obtain the academic degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences (Dr. rer. nat.) and approved by the Faculty of Biology, Chemistry, and Geosciences of the University of Bayreuth. Date of submission: 11. May 2020 Date of defense: 23. July 2020 Acting dean: Prof. Dr. Matthias Breuning Doctoral committee: Prof. Dr. Marcus. A. Horn (reviewer) Prof. Harold L. Drake, PhD (reviewer) Prof. Dr. Gerhard Rambold (chairman) Prof. Dr. Stefan Peiffer In the battle between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins, not through strength but by perseverance. Harriett Jackson Brown Jr. CONTENTS CONTENTS CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ i FIGURES.............................................................................................................................. vi TABLES ..............................................................................................................................
  • Ramlibacter Alkalitolerans Sp. Nov., Alkali-Tolerant Bacterium Isolated from Soil of Ginseng

    Ramlibacter Alkalitolerans Sp. Nov., Alkali-Tolerant Bacterium Isolated from Soil of Ginseng

    TAXONOMIC DESCRIPTION Lee and Cha, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:4619–4623 DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.002342 Ramlibacter alkalitolerans sp. nov., alkali-tolerant bacterium isolated from soil of ginseng Do-Hoon Lee and Chang-Jun Cha* Abstract A novel bacterial strain, designated CJ661T, was isolated from soil of ginseng in Anseong, South Korea. Cells of strain CJ661T were white-coloured, Gram-staining-negative, non-motile, aerobic and rod-shaped. Strain CJ661T grew optimally at 30 C and pH 7.0. The analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain CJ661T showed that it belongs to the genus Ramlibacter within the family Comamonadaceae and was most closely related to Ramlibacter ginsenosidimutans KCTC 22276T (98.1 %), followed by Ramlibacter henchirensis DSM 14656T (97.1 %). DNA–DNA relatedness levels of strain CJ661T were 40.6 % to R. ginsenosidimutans KCTC 22276T and 25.0 % to R. henchirensis DSM 14656T. The major isoprenoid quinone was ubiquinone (Q-8). The predominant polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, diphosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylglycerol. The T major cellular fatty acids of strain CJ661 were summed feature 3 (C16 : 1 !6c and/or C16 : 1 !7c), C16 : 0 and summed feature 8 (C18 : 1 !7c and/or C18 : 1 !6c). The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 65.4 mol%. On the basis polyphasic taxonomic data, strain CJ661T represents a novel species in the genus Ramlibacter, for which name Ramlibacter alkalitolerans sp. nov. is proposed; the type strain is CJ661T (=KACC 19305T=JCM 32081T). The genus Ramlibacter was introduced by Heulin et al. [1], (Qiagen). The 16S rRNA gene sequence was determined at and belongs to the family Comamonadaceae in the class Solgent (Daejeon, Korea) using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Betaproteobacteria.
  • The Role of Photoheterotrophic and Chemoautotrophic

    The role of photoheterotrophic and chemoautotrophic prokaryotes in the microbial food web in terrestrial Antarctica: a cultivation approach combined with functional analysis Guillaume Tahon Promotor Prof. Dr. Anne Willems Dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor (Ph.D.) of Science: Biotechnology (Ghent University) Tahon Guillaume | The role of photoheterotrophic and chemoautotrophic prokaryotes in the microbial food web in terrestrial Antarctica: a cultivation approach combined with functional analysis Copyright © 2017, Tahon Guillaume ISBN-number: 978-94-6197-523-2 All rights are reserved. No part of this thesis protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system without written permission of the author and promotor. Printed by University Press | http://www.universitypress.be Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium This Ph.D. work was supported by the Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders (project G.0146.12) Publically defended in Ghent, Belgium, May 5th, 2017 Examination committee Prof. Dr. Savvas Savvides (Chairman) L-Probe: Laboratory for protein Biochemistry and Biomolecular Engineering Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium VIB Inflammation Research Center VIB, Ghent, Belgium Prof. Dr. Anne Willems (Promotor) LM-UGent: Laboratory of Microbiology Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium Prof. Dr. Elie Verleyen (Secretary) Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium Em. Prof. Dr. Paul De Vos LM-UGent: Laboratory of Microbiology Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium Dr. Natalie Leys SCK·CEN: Environment, Health and Safety Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium Dr.
  • Characterisation of Methylotrophs in the Rhizosphere

    Characterisation of Methylotrophs in the Rhizosphere

    Characterisation of methylotrophs in the rhizosphere Michael C. Macey Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK School of Environmental Sciences September 2017 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisory team, Colin Murrell, Giles Oldroyd and Phil Poole. I would like to give special thanks to Colin Murrell for giving me the opportunity to complete this PhD at the UEA and for all of his advice and guidance over the course of four years. I would like to thank the Norwich Research Park and the BBSRC doctoral training program for their funding of my PhD. I would also like to thank the other members of the Murrell lab, both past and present, especially Dr. Andrew Crombie and Dr. Jennifer Pratscher, for their invaluable discussion and input into my research. I would like to thank Dr. Stephen Dye, Dr. Marta Soffker and the staff of Cefas for the opportunity to complete my internship at Cefas Lowestoft. I would like to thank everyone from the UEA I have worked and interacted with over my time here. Finally, I want to thank my wife and my family for their continued support. 2 Abstract Methanol is the second most abundant volatile organic compound in the atmosphere, with the majority of this methanol being produced as a waste metabolic by-product of the growth and decay of plants.
  • Isolation and Characterization of Aerobic Anoxygenic Phototrophs

    Isolation and Characterization of Aerobic Anoxygenic Phototrophs

    Systematic and Applied Microbiology 40 (2017) 357–369 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Systematic and Applied Microbiology j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.de/syapm Isolation and characterization of aerobic anoxygenic phototrophs from exposed soils from the Sør Rondane Mountains, East Antarctica ∗ Guillaume Tahon, Anne Willems Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: This study investigated the culturable aerobic phototrophic bacteria present in soil samples collected in Received 16 March 2017 the proximity of the Belgian Princess Elisabeth Station in the Sør Rondane Mountains, East Antarctica. Received in revised form 15 May 2017 Until recently, only oxygenic phototrophic bacteria (Cyanobacteria) were well known from Antarctic soils. Accepted 16 May 2017 However, more recent non-cultivation-based studies have demonstrated the presence of anoxygenic phototrophs and, particularly, aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria in these areas. Approximately Keywords: 1000 isolates obtained after prolonged incubation under different growth conditions were studied and pufLM characterized by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Repre- AAP Proteorhodopsin sentative strains were identified by sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes. More than half of the isolates Actinorhodopsin grouped among known aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic taxa, particularly with Sphingomonadaceae, Cultivation Methylobacterium and Brevundimonas. In addition, a total of 330 isolates were tested for the presence of key phototrophy genes. While rhodopsin genes were not detected, multiple isolates possessed key genes of the bacteriochlorophyll synthesis pathway. The majority of these potential aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic strains grouped with Alphaproteobacteria (Sphingomonas, Methylobacterium, Brevundimonas and Polymorphobacter).
  • Taxonomy File Update October 2015 Mary Thaler (Mary.Thaler.1@Ulaval.Ca)

    Taxonomy File Update October 2015 Mary Thaler ([email protected])

    Taxonomy File Update October 2015 Mary Thaler ([email protected]) The following updates were tested on a dataset generated by Illumina MiSeq from an epishelf lake in the high Arctic (Thaler, unpublished data). The revisions used as their starting point the June 2015 version of the Eukarya database and the January 2015 version of the Bacteria database. Bacteria: updates to Comamonadaceae (Betaproteobacteria) and Rhodobacteraceae (Alphaproteobacteria) Comamonadaceae Revisions focused on the related genera Rhodoferax, Albidiferax, Polaromonas, Variovorax, Limnohabitans and Curvibacter. To guide revisions of the database, a 16S rRNA gene alignment was constructed using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004). All sequences were checked manually for chimeras by examining alignments, and a number of suspect sequences were removed from all genera. The final alignment contained 135 cultured and environmental sequences, plus 18 other Comamonadaceae sequences. Outgroups were betaproteobacteria Parapusillimonas granuli, Gallionella ferruginea and Thiobacillus thioparus. The alignment had 1582 characters. A maximum-likelihood tree was constructed using RAxML v7.2.7 (Stamatakis 2006), with 100 bootstraps (tree is available on request from Mary Thaler). Published sequences from cultured described species, following Willems (2014) improved the taxonomic resolution of the database to species-level (Table 1) Table 1. Described Comamonadaceae species added to the reference database Caenimonas terrae Polaromonas aquatica Rhodoferax saidenbachensis Curvibacter delicatus Polaromonas cryoconiti Variovorax boronicumulans Curvibacter fontanus Polaromonas glacialis Variovorax defluvii Curvibacter gracilis Polaromonas jejuensis Variovorax dokdonensis Limnohabitans australis Polaromonas rhizosphaerae Variovorax ginsengisoli Limnohabitans curvus Polaromonas vacuolata Variovorax soli Limnohabitans parvus Rhodoferax antarcticus Limnohabitans planktonicus Rhodoferax fermentans The database was also expanded to include the genus Pseudorhodoferax, a genus of soil bacteria (Bruland et al.
  • Contrasting Patterns of Microbial Communities in Glacier Cryoconite of Nepali Himalaya and Greenland, Arctic

    Contrasting Patterns of Microbial Communities in Glacier Cryoconite of Nepali Himalaya and Greenland, Arctic

    sustainability Article Contrasting Patterns of Microbial Communities in Glacier Cryoconite of Nepali Himalaya and Greenland, Arctic Purnima Singh 1,2, Masaharu Tsuji 3 , Shiv Mohan Singh 4,5,* and Nozomu Takeuchi 6 1 Parvatibai Chowgule College of Arts & Science, Goa 403602, India; [email protected] 2 NPDF-Science and Engineering Research Board, New Delhi 110 070, India 3 Department of Materials Chemistry, Asahikawa College, National Institute of Technology, Hokkaido 071-8142, Japan; [email protected] 4 Polar Biology Laboratory, National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research, Goa 403804, India 5 Department of Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India 6 Department of Earth Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 June 2020; Accepted: 30 July 2020; Published: 11 August 2020 Abstract: To understand the microbial composition and diversity patterns, cryoconite granules were collected from two geographical areas, i.e., Nepali Himalaya and Greenland, Arctic. 16S rRNA, ITS and the D1/D2 domain sequencing techniques were used for characterization of microbial communities of the four glaciers. The total 13 species of bacteria such as Bacillus aryabhattai, Bacillus simplex, Brevundimonas vesicularis, Cryobacterium luteum, Cryobacterium psychrotolerans, Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis, Glaciihabitans tibetensis, Leifsonia kafniensis, Paracoccus limosus, Polaromonas glacialis,
  • Downloaded in GI List Format

    Downloaded in GI List Format

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.046896; this version posted April 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Expanding the diversity of bacterioplankton isolates and modeling isolation efficacy with 2 large scale dilution-to-extinction cultivation 3 4 5 6 Michael W. Henson1,#, V. Celeste Lanclos1, David M. Pitre2, Jessica Lee Weckhorst2,†, Anna M. 7 Lucchesi2, Chuankai Cheng1, Ben Temperton3*, and J. Cameron Thrash1* 8 9 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, 10 U.S.A. 11 2Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, 12 U.S.A. 13 3School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4QD, U.K. 14 #Current affiliation: Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 15 60637, U.S.A. 16 †Quantitative and Computational Biosciences Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 17 TX 77030, U.S.A. 18 19 *Correspondence: 20 21 J. Cameron Thrash 22 [email protected] 23 24 Ben Temperton 25 [email protected] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Running title: Evaluation of large-scale DTE cultivation 40 41 42 Keywords: dilution-to-extinction, cultivation, bacterioplankton, LSUCC, microbial ecology, 43 coastal microbiology 44 45 46 Page 1 of 43 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.046896; this version posted April 18, 2020.
  • Effects of Elevated Tropospheric Ozone Concentration on the Bacterial Community in the Phyllosphere and Rhizoplane of Rice

    Effects of Elevated Tropospheric Ozone Concentration on the Bacterial Community in the Phyllosphere and Rhizoplane of Rice

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Effects of Elevated Tropospheric Ozone Concentration on the Bacterial Community in the Phyllosphere and Rhizoplane of Rice Yoshiaki Ueda1¤, Katharina Frindte2, Claudia Knief2, Md Ashrafuzzaman1, Michael Frei1* 1 Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES) – Plant Nutrition, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, 2 Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES) – Molecular Biology of the Rhizosphere, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany ¤ Current address: Laboratory of Plant Biotechnology, Biotechnology Research Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan * [email protected] a11111 Abstract Microbes constitute a vital part of the plant holobiont. They establish plant-microbe or microbe-microbe associations, forming a unique microbiota with each plant species and under different environmental conditions. These microbial communities have to adapt to diverse environmental conditions, such as geographical location, climate conditions and OPEN ACCESS soil types, and are subjected to changes in their surrounding environment. Elevated ozone Citation: Ueda Y, Frindte K, Knief C, Ashrafuzzaman concentration is one of the most important aspects of global change, but its effect on micro- M, Frei M (2016) Effects of Elevated Tropospheric Ozone Concentration on the Bacterial Community in bial communities living on plant surfaces has barely been investigated. In the current study, the Phyllosphere and Rhizoplane of Rice. PLoS ONE we aimed at elucidating the potential effect of elevated ozone concentrations on
  • The Two Tort Dit U Noutati Na Maturit In

    The Two Tort Dit U Noutati Na Maturit In

    THETWO TORT DIT USU NOUTATI20180020671A1 NA MATURIT IN ( 19) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2018 / 0020671 A1 WIGLEY et al. ( 43 ) Pub . Date: Jan . 25 , 2018 ( 54 ) AGRICULTURALLY BENEFICIAL on May 22 , 2015 , provisional application No . 62 / 280 , MICROBES , MICROBIAL COMPOSITIONS, AND CONSORTIA 503 , filed on Jan . 19 , 2016 . (71 ) Applicant : BIOCONSORTIA , INC . , Davis , CA (US ) Publication Classification (72 ) Inventors: Peter WIGLEY , Auckland (NZ ) ; (51 ) Int. CI. Susan TURNER , Davis , CA (US ) ; AOIN 63 / 00 (2006 . 01) Caroline GEORGE , Auckland (NZ ) ; C12N 1 / 20 ( 2006 .01 ) Thomas WILLIAMS, Davis , CA (US ) ; (52 ) U . S . Cl. Kelly ROBERTS , Davis , CA (US ) ; CPC .. .. .. AOIN 63/ 00 (2013 . 01 ) ; C12N 1 /20 Graham HYMUS , Davis , CA (US ) ; ( 2013 .01 ) Kelvin LAU , Auckland ( NZ ) ( 73 ) Assignee : BIOCONSORTIA , INC ., Davis , CA (US ) (57 ) ABSTRACT (21 ) Appl . No. : 15 /549 , 815 The disclosure relates to isolated microorganisms- including (22 ) PCT Filed : Feb . 9 , 2016 novel strains of the microorganisms -microbial consortia , and agricultural compositions comprising the same. Further ( 86 ) PCT No. : PCT/ US2016 /017204 more , the disclosure teaches methods of utilizing the described microorganisms, microbial consortia , and agricul $ 371 ( c ) ( 1 ) , tural compositions comprising the same, in methods for ( 2 ) Date : Aug . 9 , 2017 imparting beneficial properties to target plant species. In Related U . S . Application Data particular aspects , the disclosure provides methods of (60 ) Provisional application No. 62/ 113 , 792 , filed on Feb . increasing desirable plant traits in agronomically important 9 , 2015 , provisional application No . 62 / 165 ,620 , filed crop species. Patent Application Publication Jan . 25 , 2018 Sheet 1 of 11 US 2018 / 0020671 A1 FIG .