WILLIAM HENRY BREWER I828-1910
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
6 Bull. Hist. Chem. 2
6 ll. t. Ch. 2 (88 di scienze naturali ed economiche. Palermo, 86 ( Aprl, , OLD CHEMISTRIES 4. Krnr thn rn n Stnl Cnnzzr lbrtr n lr. I h t thn rfr nll ln f th Mystery Editors of Early American Chemistry Texts Unvrt f lr fr ndn phtp f th Itln rtl. Wll . Wll, rdn Unvrt . G. Krnr, Ueber die Bestimmung des chemischen Ortes bei den aromatischen Substanzen, d. G. rn nd . nztt American chemistry, like its culture and commerce, was (Ostwalds Klassiker der exakten Wissenschaften, . 4, pz, dominated by European influence until the latter half of the 0, p. 19th century. More than half of the chemistry books published 4. r xpl, b A. r, Annalen der Chemie, 80, 155, in America prior to 1850 were American editions of European 282, 2 b C. Shrlr, J. Chem. Soc., 8, 24, 4n. b W. works (1). The most widely used European works included Kn, Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges., 8, /2, 4 nd b r, Chaptal's Elnt f Chtr (1796 to 1813), Henry's rl n 86 ( lttr pblhd hr. Svrl nr Ept f Chtr nd Elnt fExprntl Chtr ntprr r rt tht Krnr nt "rv ttthlnn" (1802 to 1831), Marcet's Cnvrtn n Chtr (1806 t frnd rfrn fr ttn. to 1850), Brande's Mnl f Chtr (1821 to 1839), . r, "On th Oxdtn rdt f ln,"r. Roy. Turner's Elnt f Chtr (1830 to 1874) and Fowne's Soc. Edinburgh, 82 (rd n 6 n 80, , 2 bd., Trans. Mnl f Elntr Chtr (1845 to 1878). Even so- Roy. -
Cortti • at the North End) New Haven New Haven County Connecticut
John Pitkin Norton House HABS No. CONN-287 52 Hillhouse Avenue HAb£> (west side of Hillhouse Cortti • at the north end) New Haven New Haven County Connecticut PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA • Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation 801 - 19th Street N.W. • Washington, D.C. HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY HABS No. G0NN-287 m JOHN PITKIN NORTON HOUSE $^gWH% zs - Location: 52 Hillhouse Avenue (west side of Hillhouse at the north end). New Haven, New Haven County, Connecticut. Present Owner: Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Present Occupant: Yale University. Present Use: Economic Growth Center offices* Statement of Fine example of asymmetrical Italian Villa style house Significance: designed by Henry Austin. PART I. HISTORICAL INFORMATION A. Physical History: 1. Original and subsequent owners: Following is an incomplete chain of title to the land on which the structure is built. Reference is to the Bulletin of Yale University, Series 61, Number 3. 1849 Professor John Pitkin Norton 1852 John A, Davenport 1864 Miss Elizabeth Wheeler Davenport 1895 Judge Lynde Harrison 1908 John T, Manson 1923 Purchased by Yale University 2. Date of erection: 1849 3. Architect: Henry Austin, 1804-1891. 4. Original plans, construction, etc.: Photocopies of archi- tect' s elevations included in this report, i.e., Front elevation; South side elevation, Principal floor Plan; Rear Elevation, chamber plan; North side Elevation, Base- ment plan. 5. Alterations and additions: South wing, rear wing and third story added at undetermined date. Main staircase and interior trim altered apparently between 1895 and 1908. No signi- ficant Austin detail remains in principal rooms, except newel post of main staircase. -
Lloyd Ackert, Ph.D
Lloyd Ackert, Ph.D. Contact Information Work: Department of History & Politics Office: 215-895-0993 Drexel University [email protected] 3141 Chestnut Street www.lloydackert.com Philadelphia, PA 19104 Current Position 2006-Present Assistant Teaching Professor in History, Department of History & Politics, Drexel University 2010- Present Director, Master’s Program in Science, Technology and Society Previous Position 2004-2006 Yale University Library Special Collections Humanities Fellow, and Post- Doctoral Associate at the Department of the History of Science and History of Medicine at Yale University (Supervisor, Alice Prochaska, University Librarian, Yale University Library) Education 1997-2004 Ph. D. Program in the History of Science, Medicine, and Technology, The Johns Hopkins University. Program completed and degree awarded May 2004 Fields Completed graduate fields in History of Russian Science (with Professor Daniel Todes), History of Biology and Ecology (with Professor Sharon Kingsland), and Russian History (with Professor Jeffrey Brooks), 1999-2000 Thesis From the “Thermodynamics of Life” to Ecological Microbiology: Sergei Vinogradskii and the Cycle of Life, 1850-1950, Abstract Number, AAT 3130632 Languages Russian (fluent), French (reading/basic speaking), German (reading) 1996-1997 Graduate Student, The Institute for the History of Natural Science and Technology, The Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia (tutorials in the history of Russian biology and ecology, and the sociology of scientific knowledge, conducted in Russian, with Professors Eduard Kolchinskii and Yasha Gall) 1991-1996 Interdepartmental Interdisciplinary Major, College of Liberal Arts, The University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Campus. Interdisciplinary Major in History of Science, Evolutionary Biology (in Professor James Curtsinger’s Genetics Laboratory), and Russian Language and Areas Studies (Major Supervisor, Professor John Beatty). -
Denison Olmsted (1791-1859), Scientist, Teacher, Christian: a Biographical Study of the Connection Of
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Gary Lee Schoepflin for the degree ofDoctor of Philosophy in General Science presented on June 17, 1977 Title:DENISON OLMSTED (1791-1859), SCIENTIST, TEACHER, CHRISTIAN: A BIOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF THE CONNECTION OF SCIENCE WITH RELIGION IN ANTEBELLUM AMERICA Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: Danie JJ one s A biographical study of Denison Olmsted, focusing upon his own Christian world view and its connection with his various activities in science, supports the view that religion served as a significant factor in the promotion of science in America during this time period. Olmsted taught physics, meteorology and astronomy at Yale from 1826 to 1859, and from this position of influence, helped mold the minds and outlook of a new generation of scientists, of hundreds of students who came to Yale to obtain a liberal educa- tion, and of those members of society who attended his popular lectures.Olmsted's personal perspective was that science was God-ordained, that it would ever harmonize with religion, that it was indeed a means of hastening the glorious millennium. Olmsted lived in an era characterized by an unprecedented revivalism and emphasis upon evangelical Christianity. He graduated from Yale (1813) at a time when its president, Reverend Dr. Timothy Dwight, one of the most influential clergymen in New England, was at the height of his fame. Olmsted subsequently studied theology under Dwight, but before completing his prepara- tion for the ministry, Olmsted was appointed to a professorship of science at the University of North Carolina where he taught from 1818 until he was called to Yale in 1826. -
GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1
NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS Dr. Harry A. Butowsky GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1 Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study (Draft 1990) Introduction by Dr. Harry A. Butowsky Historian, History Division National Park Service, Washington, DC The Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study represents the second phase of the National Park Service's thematic study of the history of American science. Phase one of this study, Astronomy and Astrophysics: A National Historic Landmark Theme Study was completed in l989. Subsequent phases of the science theme study will include the disciplines of biology, chemistry, mathematics, physics and other related sciences. The Science Theme Study is being completed by the National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service in compliance with the requirements of the Historic Sites Act of l935. The Historic Sites Act established "a national policy to preserve for public use historic sites, buildings and objects of national significance for the inspiration and benefit of the American people." Under the terms of the Act, the service is required to survey, study, protect, preserve, maintain, or operate nationally significant historic buildings, sites & objects. The National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service is charged with the responsibility of identifying America's nationally significant historic property. The survey meets this obligation through a comprehensive process involving thematic study of the facets of American History. In recent years, the survey has completed National Historic Landmark theme studies on topics as diverse as the American space program, World War II in the Pacific, the US Constitution, recreation in the United States and architecture in the National Parks. -
The Publication Program of the Maryland Historical Society1
The Publication Program of the 1 Maryland Historical Society Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/15/4/309/2743272/aarc_15_4_7866080k981t6714.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 By FRED SHELLEY Maryland Historical Society ROM its founding in 1844 the Maryland Historical Society has taken the position that the publication of learned papers Fand source materials is one of its major responsibilities.2 In that year most of the leading citizens of Baltimore joined and sup- ported the new society. Corresponding members — living in Mary- land but more than 15 miles from Baltimore — and honorary mem- bers increased the total. The membership remained numerically small, however, seldom exceeding 500, until a decade ago when Sen. George L. Radcliffe, the president, and James W. Foster, the director, set about the task of making the society's purpose and service known to all in Maryland. Though small in numbers, the early membership was distinguished. Brantz Mayer and John H. B. Latrobe, both subsequently presidents of the society, were guid- ing spirits in the formative days.3 The first president, John Spear Smith, was the son of the patriot and senator, Samuel Smith. He had both the leisure and interest to be present at the society quarters from 10 to 3 each day. Other early members include John P. Ken- nedy, the author, whose place in American letters is still to be de- 1 Shortened version of a paper read at the annual meeting of the Society of Ameri- can Archivists, Annapolis, Maryland, Oct. 16, 1951, and at the annual meeting of the Maryland Library Association, Baltimore, Oct. -
Do Real-Output and Real-Wage Measures Capture Reality? the History of Lighting Suggests Not
This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The Economics of New Goods Volume Author/Editor: Timothy F. Bresnahan and Robert J. Gordon, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-07415-3 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/bres96-1 Publication Date: January 1996 Chapter Title: Do Real-Output and Real-Wage Measures Capture Reality? The History of Lighting Suggests Not Chapter Author: William D. Nordhaus Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c6064 Chapter pages in book: (p. 27 - 70) Historical Reassessments of Economic Progress This Page Intentionally Left Blank 1 Do Real-Output and Real-Wage Measures Capture Reality? The History of Lighting Suggests Not William D. Nordhaus 1.1 The Achilles Heel of Real Output and Wage Measures Studies of the growth of real output or real wages reveal almost two centu- ries of rapid growth for the United States and western Europe. As figure 1.1 shows, real incomes (measured as either real wages or per capita gross national product [ GNP] ) have grown by a factor of between thirteen and eighteen since the first half of the nineteenth century. An examination of real wages shows that they grew by about 1 percent annually between 1800 and 1900 and at an accelerated rate between 1900 and 1950. Quantitative estimates of the growth of real wages or real output have an oft forgotten Achilles heel. While it is relatively easy to calculate nominal wages and outputs, conversion of these into real output or real wages requires calcula- tion of price indexes for the various components of output. -
Yale University Catalogue, 1860 Yale University
Yale University EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale Yale University Catalogue Yale University Publications 1860 Yale University Catalogue, 1860 Yale University Follow this and additional works at: http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_catalogue Recommended Citation Yale University, "Yale University Catalogue, 1860" (1860). Yale University Catalogue. 49. http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yale_catalogue/49 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Yale University Publications at EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale University Catalogue by an authorized administrator of EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CATALOGUE OF THE OFFICERS AND STUDENTS IN YALE COLLEGE, WITH A STATEMENT OF THE COURSE OF INSTRUCTION IN THE VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS. 1860-61. P It IX TED BY E. H ~YES, 426 C II APEL T. 1860. 2 THE GOVERNOR, LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, AND SIX SENIOR SENATORS OF THE STATE ARE, ex officio, )(EMBERS OF THE CORPORATION. PB.ESJ:DENT. REv. THEODORE D. WOOLSEY, D. D., LL. D. FELLOWS.• Hrs Exe. WILLIAM A. BUCKINGHAM, NoRWICH. His IloNoR JULIUS CATLIN, HARTFORD. REv. DAVID SMITH, D. D., DuanAl'tl. REV. NOAH PORTER, D. D., FARl\IINGTON. REV. JEREMIAH DAY, D. D., LL. D., NEW HAVEN. REV. JOEL HAWES, D. D., HARTFORD. REV. JOSEPH ELDRIDGE, D. D., NORFOLK. REV. GEORGE A. CALHOUN, D. D., COVENTRY. REv. GEORGE J. TILLOTSON, PuTNAl\l. REV. EDWIN R. GILBERT, WALLINGFORD. REV. JOEL H. LINSLEY, D. D., GREENWICH. HoN. ELISHA JOHNSON, HARTFORD. HoN. JOHN W. -
Sherbornia 2017 | Woodman – American Journal of Science
Sherbornia 2017 | Woodman – American Journal of Science E‐ISSN 2373‐7697 Sherbornia Volume 4(2): 9–21 Date of publication: An Open‐Access Journal of Bibliographic 1 March 2017 and Nomenclatural Research in Zoology lsid:zoobank.org:pub:916F9AA2‐19A5‐4DAE‐A87D‐9A5B2F4CD34E There are multiple editions of the first volume of Benjamin Silliman’s American Journal of Science―and why it matters Neal Woodman USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, MRC‐111, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013‐7012 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] Abstract The oldest continuously‐published North American scientific journal, the American Journal of Science, first appeared in 1818 under the management and editorship of Benjamin Silliman, a mineralogist and chemist at Yale College, New Haven, Connecticut. At that time, the journal presented articles on a multitude of natural history topics, including descriptions of new species of plants and animals. In an effort to provide complete sets of the journal to all subscribers who wanted them, Silliman subsequently republished all four numbers of the first volume of the journal. Unfortunately, this attempt to provide wide access to the journal resulted in confusion regarding the correct dates of publication for some of the scientific names that first appeared on its pages. In this paper, I address the problem caused by the publication of multiple editions of Volume 1 of the American Journal of Science, review the dates of publication of the editions, and describe characteristics that distinguish the editions. For taxonomists, it is relevant that all species described in Volume 1 appeared in the first edition, which spans the years 1818–1819. -
Networking Social Scholarship…Again
Martin, Shawn. 2019. Networking Social Scholarship…Again. KULA: knowledge creation, dissemination, and preservation studies 3(1): 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.47 RESEARCH ARTICLE Networking Social Scholarship…Again Shawn Martin Indiana University, US [email protected] This paper proposes to answer several questions that arise from the actions of American scientists between 1840 and 1890. How did the broader organization of science in the late nineteenth century create a system of professional disciplines? Why did the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) form, and why did specialized societies like the American Chemical Society (ACS) later found an organization separate from the AAAS? Why did these professional societies create journals, and how did these journals help to communicate science? This paper combines both quantitative textual analysis and qualitative historical and sociological methods within the context of nineteenth-century American science. It is hoped that by broadening the methods used, and by better understanding the early deliberations of scientists before there was a formal scholarly communication system, it may be possible to contextualize current debates about the need for changes in the scholarly communication system. Keywords: Scholarly communication; publishing; history of science Introduction In the digital age, technological change and evolving scholarly practices have transformed the ways in which university faculty communicate their work. In the twenty-first century, the scholarly communication system is a complex social mechanism encompassing publishers, peer-reviewers, tenure committees, and many other actors. According to Christine Borgman (2000), the most essential element of the scholarly communication, or academic publishing, system is the journal article, which has remained ‘remarkably stable and print publication continues unabated, despite the proliferation of digital media’ (413). -
The Nucleus Society
Salem State University Digital Commons at Salem State University Northeastern Section of the American Chemical The Nucleus Society 1924-3 The Nucleus Northeastern Section of the American Chemical Society Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.salemstate.edu/nucleus Recommended Citation Northeastern Section of the American Chemical Society, "The Nucleus" (1924). The Nucleus. 2. https://digitalcommons.salemstate.edu/nucleus/2 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Northeastern Section of the American Chemical Society at Digital Commons at Salem State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Nucleus by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Salem State University. THE NUCLEUS Published by the Northeastern Section of the American Chemical Society with the cooperation of The Connecticut Valley Section and The Rhode Island Section VoL. I MARCH, 1924 No.2 Remember the Spring Meeting of the American Chemical Society at Washington, D. C., April 21.-26, 1924 Make Hotel Reservations at once Your local secretary can supply the blanks for reduced railroad fares Official Notices of the Next Meetings on Page 3 2 THE NUCLEUS EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES FOR THE LABORATORY LABORATORY·CHEMICALS BALANCES SPECIAL APPARATUS to specifications, from Glass, Porcelain, Metal PURE GUM RUBBER TUBING The kind you had before the war MICROSCOPES Attachments and Materials for Microphotography HEAVY CHEMICALS Any quantity, from pounds to carloads PAINT DEPARTMENT offers everything for Interior and Exterior Finishing, in cluding Brushes, both Air and Bristle INFORMATION BUREAU will co-operate in securing any desired information HOWE & FRENCH, Inc. BOSTON Main 5910 99 Broad Street Branch Exchange Cor. -
Developing the Country “Scientific Agriculture” and the Roots of the Republican Party
DEVELOPING THE COUNTRY “SCIENTIFIC AGRICULTURE” AND THE ROOTS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY by Ariel Ron A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Robin Einhorn, Chair Professor Brian DeLay Professor Richard Walker Spring 2012 Developing the County: “Scientific Agriculture” and the Roots of the Republican Party Copyright 2012 By Ariel Ron 1 ABSTRACT Developing the Country: “Scientific Agriculture” and the Roots of the Republican Party By Ariel Ron Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Robin L. Einhorn, Chair This dissertation examines the emergence and political significance of the antebellum agricultural reform movement in order to investigate how economic change structured party realignment in the decade before the Civil War. It focuses attention on a critical yet almost ignored constituency of the period, northeastern farmers, showing why they would steadfastly support a Republican Party typically associated with manufacturers. Second, it uncovers the roots of one of our most powerful and enduring special interest groups—the agricultural lobby—demonstrating its powerful impact on federal policy as early as the antebellum period. It thus sheds new light on the causes of sectional conflict and on the course of American state development in the 1800s. At midcentury the rural Northeast faced a four-fold challenge: (1) depleted soils resulting from over-cropping; (2) western competition in grains; (3) steady out-migration; and (4) increasingly virulent pest infestations. Agricultural reformers responded by arguing for a modernized “scientific agriculture” that would reinvigorate the northeastern countryside.