Evolutionary Perspectives for the Analysis of Prehistoric Lithic Artifacts: an Example from the Western Highland Rim of Tennessee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolutionary Perspectives for the Analysis of Prehistoric Lithic Artifacts: an Example from the Western Highland Rim of Tennessee University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-1994 Evolutionary Perspectives for the Analysis of Prehistoric Lithic Artifacts: An Example from the Western Highland Rim of Tennessee Andrew P. Bradbury University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Bradbury, Andrew P., "Evolutionary Perspectives for the Analysis of Prehistoric Lithic Artifacts: An Example from the Western Highland Rim of Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1994. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4117 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Andrew P. Bradbury entitled "Evolutionary Perspectives for the Analysis of Prehistoric Lithic Artifacts: An Example from the Western Highland Rim of Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Jan F. Simek, Walter E. Klippel Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Andrew P. Bradbury entitled "Evolutionary Perspectives for the Analysis of Prehistoric Lithic Artifacts: An Example from the Western Highland Rim of Tennessee." I have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: � Accepted for the Council: ·----� Associate Vice Chancellor and Dean of The Graduate School Evolutionary Perspectives For The Analysis Of Prehistoric Lithic Artifacts: An Example From The Western Highland Rim of Tennessee A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee Andrew P. Bradbury May 1994 STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master's degree at The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, I agree that the Library shall make it available to the borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgement of the source is made. Permission for extensive quotation from or reproduction of this thesis may be granted by my major professor, or in his absence, by the Head of Interlibrary Services when, in the opinion of either, the proposed use of the material is for scholarly purposes. Any copying or the use of the material in this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Signature � � l'i1 Date -2. , /ipr-< ( '( ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis has benefitted from the contributions of a number of people. I would first like to thank my committee members, Drs. Charles H. Faulkner, Jan F. Simek, and Walter E. Klippel for their help and guidance throughout this research. I am indebted to Dr. Faulkner for all the help, encouragement, and friendship that he has shown over the many years that I have known him. His devotion to archaeology, extensive knowledge of Southeastern prehistory, and skill as a teacher have served, not only as a source of inspiration, but also as model of what it means to be a true professional. Drs. Simek and Klippel both gave freely of their time and provided many useful comments that added much 'grist to my mill of knowledge'. Discussions with Dr. Mike H. Logan, Department of Anthropology, helped to clarify my understanding evolutionary theory as applicable to cultural phenomena. Dr. John Philpot, Department of Statistics, made useful suggestions concerning statistical manipulation of the data. Dr. Jefferson Chapman, Director of the Frank H. Mcclung Museum, allowed me access to archaeological collections housed at the museum. I am also grateful to Dr. Chapman for giving me a start in archaeology thirteen years ago. The original funding for excavations of the Wells Creek material was provided by the Tennessee Department of Transportation in conjunction with the relocation of State ii Route 149, Houston County, Tennessee. The following people aided in the field excavations and/or laboratory processing of materials recovered during the CRM excavations: Allen Longmire, Sean Coughlin, Brad Creswell, Jim East, Patty Evans, Jay Franklin, Joanne Juchniewicz, Matt Matternes, Gerald Moore, Angela Tine, and Hakon Vigander. These individuals survived the 'Middle Tennessee sun fest' of July and August, 1990, the joys of waterscreening from January to March, and 'more science than humans should be allowed' during the lab processing of these materials. Chuck Bentz served as Principal Investigator. I consider myself fortunate to have been a part of such an excellent group of graduate students. Phil Carr, Sean Coughlin, Lance Greene, Maureen Hays, Hank McKelway, Noeleeri Mcilvenna, Steve Ousley, and Amy Young all deserve my thanks and recognition for the many informative discussions, friendship, encouragement, and the pursuit of decadence and otherwise socially unacceptable behavior that is part of the total college experience. Phil Carr also put together a 'blind test' as part of my micro-wear education, and has always had a few minutes to talk about 'the entity of life'; lithics. Joanne Juchniewicz has also offered much friendship and has been a source a numerous stimulating conversations regarding lithic analysis. I would also like to thank Terry Faulkner for the many words of encouragement and friendship iii she has offered. My two close friends; Jeff McMurry and Mike Morris provided a much needed break from the student life and the outlet with which to 'Torture' Knoxville. Most importantly, my sincere gratitude is extended to my parents; Phillip and Judith Bradbury, for their love, encouragement, and support over the years. Though they may not fully understand my somewhat bizarre fascination with lithics and prehistory they have always been very supportive of my work. My parents also provided a home, though not always knowingly, to many nodules of chert that 'followed me home' from numerous excavations. iv ABSTRACT The goal of this thesis is to develop an evolutionary framework for the analysis of prehistoric lithic artifacts. The principles of evolutionary theory are presented and then extended to the lithic artifact analysis. Methods are developed based on the theoretical framework. Lithic artifacts recovered from two Terminal Archaic Wells Creek phase sites in Houston County, Tennessee are used as a case study to demonstrate the utility of such an approach. Variability can be demonstrated with respect to morphology, technology, and function of lithic implements. Elements that may represent attributes under selective pressure are examined. The lithic material recovered from the two sites is shown to be quite distinct from other contemporary groups in the area. It is suggested here, based on similarities in both morphological forms and technology, that Wells Creek is related to the Riverton Culture and similar entities known from archaeological remains recovered from sites north of the study area. Radiocarbon dates for Wells Creek overlap those of Riverton and other similar groups. V TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I . INTRODUCTION. 1 II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION........................ 6 Environmental Background...................... 6 Geological Resources..................... 6 Faunal and Floral Resources.............. 9 Summary of Excavations....... ................. 12 Pitts Site............................... 12 Lockarts Chapel Site......... ............ 16 Radiocarbon Dates. 18 Raw Material Survey...................... 20 Overview of the Late Archaic.................. 22 Ledbetter................................ 22 Wade. 24 Riverton. 25 Wells Creek.............................. 29 Summary. ... 35 III. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES............ .......... 36 Evolution and Biological Organisms............ 36 Essentialism and Materialism .................. 42 The Essentialist View......... ........... 42 The Materialist View.... ................. 43 Application of Evolutionary Theory to Cultural Phenomena .............. : ........ 45 Operational Definitions ....................... 47 Evolution............ .................... 47 Variation................................ 48 Select ion. 4 8 Function. 4 9 Evolutionary Theory and Lithic Analysis....... 55 IV. ETHNIC MARKERS AND THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD.. 60 The Style/Function Dichotomy........... ....... 60 Ethnic Markers and Information Exchange....... 65 Ethnic Markers and the Wells Creek Assemblage. 6 8 Summary. 70 V. METHODS. 72 Debi tage Analysis. 73 Lithic Analysis Attribute Definitions .... 74 Raw Material and Source Area............. 78 Modified Chert Artifacts...................... 79 Technological/Morphological Analysis....
Recommended publications
  • LITHIC ANALYSIS (01-070-391) Rutgers University Spring 2010
    SYLLABUS LITHIC ANALYSIS (01-070-391) Rutgers University Spring 2010 Lecture days/hours: Thursday, 2:15-5:15 PM Lecture location: BioSci 206, Douglass Campus Instructors: Dr. J.W.K. Harris J.S. Reti, MA [email protected] [email protected] Office: BioSci, Room 203B Office: BioSci, Room 204C Office Hours: Friday 11:00 – 1:00 Office Hours: Thursday 1:00 – 3:00 COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course is an integrated course that incorporates theoretical, behavioral, and practical aspects of lithic technology. Lithic Analysis is an advanced undergraduate course in human and non-human primate stone technology. Each student is expected to already have taken an introductory course in human evolution, primatology, and/or archaeology. Lithic Analysis is a sub-discipline of archaeology. The focus is on the inferential potential of stone tools with regard to human behavior. Early human ancestors first realized the utility of sharp stone edges for butchery and other practices. Arguably, without the advent of stone tools human evolution would have taken a different path. Stone tools allowed early hominins efficient access to meat resources and provided as avenue for cognitive development and three-dimensional problem solving. This course will provide a three-fold approach to lithic analysis: 1) study of archaeological sites and behavioral change through time relative to lithic technological changes, 2) insight into the art of laboratory lithic analysis and methods employed to attain concrete, quantitative behavioral conclusions, and 3) extensive training in stone tool replication. Such training will provide students with both an appreciation for the skills of our ancestors and with personal skills that will allow for further research into replication and human behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA TODAY a Publication of the Geological Society of America
    Vol. 5, No. 6 June 1995 GSA TODAY A Publication of the Geological Society of America 1995 ANNUAL MEETING New Orleans, Louisiana • November 6–9 ABSTRACTS DUE JULY 12 For abstract forms (303) 447-2020, ext. 161; E-mail: [email protected] SOFTWARE FAIR PROPOSALS DUE SEPTEMBER 1 For information: (504) 286-6791; fax 504-286-7396; E-mail: [email protected] PREREGISTRATION DUE SEPTEMBER 29 Registration and housing forms enclosed INFORMATION (303) 447-2020, ext. 184 or 1-800-472-1988; fax 303-447-0648; E-mail: [email protected] he theme for the 1995 Annual Meeting is Bridging the Gulf. This theme has several meanings. In particular, we will draw attention to the Gulf of Mexico–Caribbean, and the surrounding T American continents, bridging the knowledge gap that exists across a region divided by polit- ical boundaries and language but sharing a common geologic framework. Bridging the Gulf also addresses the need to develop a closer link between technology and the science of geology and to educate the public on issues critical to the development of intelligent policies on the environment and geologic hazards. We also hope to bridge the gulf between the past and the future with both a retrospection on the past 25 years of plate tectonics and a look at the future as geology responds to society’s needs. Finally, we view the city of New Orleans, the Mississippi River and its delta, and the Gulf Coast as a laboratory where the long- term effects of humans on the environment can be examined. NEW ORLEANS: The Crescent City–New Orleans is nestled on the inside of a south-looping meander of the Mississippi River.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch. 4. NEOLITHIC PERIOD in JORDAN 25 4.1
    Borsa di studio finanziata da: Ministero degli Affari Esteri di Italia Thanks all …………. I will be glad to give my theses with all my love to my father and mother, all my brothers for their helps since I came to Italy until I got this degree. I am glad because I am one of Dr. Ursula Thun Hohenstein students. I would like to thanks her to her help and support during my research. I would like to thanks Dr.. Maysoon AlNahar and the Museum of the University of Jordan stuff for their help during my work in Jordan. I would like to thank all of Prof. Perreto Carlo and Prof. Benedetto Sala, Dr. Arzarello Marta and all my professors in the University of Ferrara for their support and help during my Phd Research. During my study in Italy I met a lot of friends and specially my colleges in the University of Ferrara. I would like to thanks all for their help and support during these years. Finally I would like to thanks the Minister of Fournier of Italy, Embassy of Italy in Jordan and the University of Ferrara institute for higher studies (IUSS) to fund my PhD research. CONTENTS Ch. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Ch. 2. AIMS OF THE RESEARCH 3 Ch. 3. NEOLITHIC PERIOD IN NEAR EAST 5 3.1. Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) in Near east 5 3.2. Pre-pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) in Near east 10 3.2.A. Early PPNB 10 3.2.B. Middle PPNB 13 3.2.C. Late PPNB 15 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeological Inventory Form Instruction Manual
    Ohio Archaeological Inventory Form Instruction Manual With the support of the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Historic Preservation Fund and the Ohio Historic Preservation Office of the Ohio Historical Society Copyright © 2007 Ohio Historical Society, Inc. All rights reserved. The publication of these materials has been made possible in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of the Interior’s National Park Service, administered by the Ohio Historic Preservation Office. However, its contents do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products imply their endorsement. The Ohio Historic Preservation Office receives federal assistance from the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Historic Preservation Fund. U.S. Department of the Interior regulations prohibit unlawful discrimination in depart- mental federally assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or disability. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington D.C. 20240. Ohio Historic Preservation Office 567 East Hudson Street Columbus, Ohio 43211-1030 614/ 298-2000 Fax 614/ 298-2037 Visit us at www.ohiohistory.org OAl Rev. June 2003 Table of Contents Introduction and General Instructions 1 Definition of Archaeological Resource (Site) 1 Submitting an Ohio Archaeological Inventory Form 2 Itemized Instructions 3 A. Identification 3 1. Type of Form 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Lithic Scatters and Sites
    Managing Lithic Scatters and Sites Archaeological guidance for planning authorities and developers 0 Managing Lithic Scatters and Sites: Archaeological guidance for planning authorities and developers Summary Lithic scatters and sites are an important archaeological resource that can provide valuable insights into prehistory. Most commonly found as scatters of worked stone, usually suspended in modern ploughsoil deposits, which have been disturbed from their original archaeological context through ploughing. Undisturbed lithic sites can also be found through further evaluation and excavations, where lithics have been sealed by cover deposits or preserved in sub-surface features/horizons. Lithic scatters can represent a palimpsest of activity, sometimes containing several technologies from different archaeological periods. Consequently, the value of lithic scatters as a source for investigating past behaviour has often been undervalued. However, in many cases, especially for sites dating from the Palaeolithic period through to the Bronze Age, lithic scatters are likely to represent the only available archaeological evidence of past human activity and subsistence strategies. By studying and understanding their formation, spatial distribution and technological attributes, we can get closer to understanding the activities of the people who created these artefacts. Lithic scatters are often perceived as being particularly problematic from a heritage resource and development management perspective, because the standard archaeological methodologies presently employed are often not sufficiently subtle to ensure their effective identification and characterisation (Last 2009). This can either lead to an unquantified loss of important archaeological evidence, or the under-estimation of the magnitude of a site’s scale and importance, leading to missed research opportunities or, in a planning/development context, potentially avoidable expense, delay and inconvenience.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lesson in Stone: Examining Patterns of Lithic Resource Use and Craft-Learning in the Minas Basin Region of Nova Scotia By
    A Lesson in Stone: Examining Patterns of Lithic Resource Use and Craft-learning in the Minas Basin Region of Nova Scotia By © Catherine L. Jalbert A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies for partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Department of Archaeology Memorial University of Newfoundland May 2011 St. John’s Newfoundland Abstract Examining the Late Woodland (1500-450 BP) quarry/workshop site of Davidson Cove, located in the Minas Basin region of Nova Scotia, a sample of debitage and a collection of stone implements appear to provide correlates of the novice and raw material production practices. Many researchers have hypothesized that lithic materials discovered at multiple sites within the region originated from the outcrop at Davidson Cove, however little information is available on lithic sourcing of the Minas Basin cherts. Considering the lack of archaeological knowledge concerning lithic procurement and production, patterns of resource use among the prehistoric indigenous populations in this region of Nova Scotia are established through the analysis of existing collections. By analysing the lithic materials quarried and initially reduced at the quarry/workshop with other contemporaneous assemblages from the region, an interpretation of craft-learning can be situated in the overall technological organization and subsistence strategy for the study area. ii Acknowledgements It is a pleasure to thank all those who made this thesis achievable. First and foremost, this thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and support provided by my supervisor, Dr. Michael Deal. His insight throughout the entire thesis process was invaluable. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Sons and Daughters Program Manual
    NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS PROGRAMS® PROGRAM MANUAL National Longhouse, Ltd. National Longhouse, Ltd. 4141 Rockside Road Suite 150 Independence, OH 44131-2594 Copyright © 2007, 2014 National Longhouse, Ltd. All rights reserved. International copyright secured. No part of this manual may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or hereafter invented, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, xerography, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of National Longhouse, Ltd. Printed in the United States of America EDITORS: Edition 1 - Barry Yamaji National Longhouse, Native Sons And Daughters Programs, Native Dads And Sons, Native Moms And Sons, Native Moms And Daughters are registered trademarks of National Longhouse, Ltd. Native Dads And Daughters, Native Sons And Daughters, NS&D Pathfinders are servicemarks of National Longhouse TABLE of CONTENTS FOREWORD xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xiii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Why NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS® Programs? 2 What Are NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS® Programs? 4 Program Format History 4 Program Overview 10 CHAPTER 2: ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES 15 Organizational Levels 16 Administrative Levels 17 National Longhouse, Ltd. 18 Regional Advisory Lodge 21 Local Longhouse 22 Nations 24 Tribes 25 CHAPTER 3: THE TRIBE 29 Preparing for a Tribe Meeting 30 Tribe Meetings 32 iii Table of Contents A Sample Tribe Meeting Procedure 34 Sample Closing Prayers 36 Tips for a Successful Meeting 37 The Parents' Meeting 38 CHAPTER 4: AWARDS, PATCHES, PROGRAM
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT Day 2007 Program
    Welcome to SUNY Geneseo’s First Annual G.R.E.A.T. Day! Geneseo Recognizing Excellence, Achievement & Talent Day is a college-wide symposium celebrating the creative and scholarly endeavors of our students. In addition to recognizing the achievements of our students, the purpose of G.R.E.A.T. Day is to help foster academic excellence, encourage professional development, and build connections within the community. The G.R.E.A.T. Day Planning Committee: Doug Anderson, School of the Arts Anne Baldwin, Sponsored Research Joan Ballard, Department of Psychology Anne Eisenberg, Department of Sociology Charlie Freeman, Department of Physics & Astronomy Tom Greenfield, Department of English Anthony Gu, School of Business Koomi Kim, School of Education Andrea Klein, Scheduling and Special Events The Planning Committee would like to thank: Stacie Anekstein, Ed Antkoviak, Brian Bennett, Cassie Brown, Michael Caputo, Sue Chichester, Betsy Colon, Laura Cook, Ann Crandall, Joe Dolce, Tammy Farrell, Carlo Filice, Richard Finkelstein, Karie Frisiras, Ginny Geer-Mentry, Becky Glass, Dave Gordon, Corey Ha, John Haley, Doug Harke, Gregg Hartvigsen, Tony Hoppa, Paul Jackson, Ellen Kintz, Nancy Johncox, Enrico Johnson, Ken Kallio, Jo Kirk, Sue Mallaber, Mary McCrank, Nancy Newcomb, Elizabeth Otero, Tracy Paradis, Jennifer Perry, Jewel Reardon, Ed Rivenburgh, Linda Shepard, Bonnie Swoger, Helen Thomas, Pam Thomas, and Taryn Thompson. Thank you to President Christopher Dahl and Provost Katherine Conway-Turner for their support of G.R.E.A.T. Day. Thank you to Lynn Weber for delivering our inaugural keynote address. The G.R.E.A.T. Day name was suggested by Elizabeth Otero, a senior Philosophy major.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Approaches to the Analysis and Interpretation of Small Lithic Sites in the Northeast the UNIVERSITY of the STATE of NEW YORK
    Current Approaches to the Analysis and Interpretation of Small Lithic Sites in the Northeast THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University ROBERT M. BENNETT, Chancellor, B.A., M.S. Tonawanda MERRYL H. TISCH, Vice Chancellor, B.A., M.A. Ed.D. New York SAUL B. COHEN, B.A., M.A., Ph.D. New Rochelle JAMES C. DAWSON, A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. Peru ANTHONY S. BOTTAR, B.A., J.D. Syracuse GERALDINE D. CHAPEY, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. Belle Harbor ARNOLD B. GARDNER, B.A., LL.B. Buffalo HARRY PHILLIPS, 3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. Hartsdale JOSEPH E. BOWMAN,JR., B.A., M.L.S., M.A., M.Ed., Ed.D. Albany JAMES R. TALLON,JR., B.A., M.A. Binghamton MILTON L. COFIELD, B.S., M.B.A., Ph.D. Rochester ROGER B. TILLES, B.A., J.D. Great Neck KAREN BROOKS HOPKINS, B.A., M.F.A. Brooklyn NATALIE M. GOMEZ-VELEZ, B.A., J.D. Bronx CHARLES R. BENDIT,B.A. ............................................................................ NewYork President of The University and Commissioner of Education RICHARD P. MILLS Deputy Commissioner for Cultural Education JEFFREY W. CANNELL Director of the New York State Museum CLIFFORD A. SIEGFRIED Director, Research and Collections Division JOHN P. HART The State Education Department does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, religion, creed, disability, marital status, veteran status, national ori- gin, race, gender, genetic predisposition or carrier status, or sexual orientation in its educational programs, services and activities. Portions of this pub- lication can be made available in a variety of formats, including braille, large print or audio tape, upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • Bladelet Polish: a Lithic Analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an Upland Hopewell Campsite
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 5-19-2018 Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite Tyler R. E. Heneghan Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Heneghan, Tyler R. E., "Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 928. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/928 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R. E. HENEGHAN 107 Pages This thesis builds upon recent investigations at Spracklen (33GR1585), a small upland site in Greene County, Ohio. The presence of non-local cherts, bladelets, and bladelet cores indicates a Middle Woodland Ohio Hopewell occupation. Raw material sourcing, debitage analyses, and a use-wear analysis uncovered that Spracklen functioned as a logistical hunting campsite. Its people utilized bladelets for butchery and hide-working processes. This information provides new insights into Hopewellian life in the uplands and its place within Hopewell community organization. KEYWORDS: Settlement patterns, Hopewell, Bladelets, Use-wear, GIS BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA on the Web
    Vol. 6, No. 4 April 1996 1996 Annual GSA TODAY Meeting Call for A Publication of the Geological Society of America Papers Page 17 Electronic Dipping Reflectors Beneath Abstracts Submission Old Orogens: A Perspective from page 18 the British Caledonides Registration Issue June GSA Today John H. McBride,* David B. Snyder, Richard W. England, Richard W. Hobbs British Institutions Reflection Profiling Syndicate, Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, United Kingdom A B Figure 1. A: Generalized location map of the British Isles showing principal structural elements (red and black) and location of selected deep seismic reflection profiles discussed here. Major normal faults are shown between mainland Scotland and Shetland. Structural contours (green) are in kilome- ters below sea level for all known mantle reflectors north of Ireland, north of mainland Scotland, and west of Shetland (e.g., Figs. 2A and 5); contours (black) are in seconds (two-way traveltime) on the reflector I-I’ (Fig. 2B) pro- jecting up to the Iapetus suture (from Soper et al., 1992). The contour inter- val is variable. B: A Silurian-Devonian (410 Ma) reconstruction of the Caledo- nian-Appalachian orogen shows the three-way closure of Laurentia and Baltica with the leading edge of Eastern Avalonia thrust under the Laurentian margin (from Soper, 1988). Long-dash line indicates approximate outer limit of Caledonian-Appalachian orogen and/or accreted terranes. GGF is Great Glen fault; NFLD. is Newfoundland. reflectors in the upper-to-middle crust, suggesting a “thick- skinned” structural style. These reflectors project downward into a pervasive zone of diffuse reflectivity in the lower crust.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES in Place of E
    1957, CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE 10833 •HAWAi:t RHODE ISLAND Irene R. Afflerback, Spreckelsville, l!awail, Richard M. Stanton, Wood River Junction, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES in place of E. J. Freitas, retired. R. I., in place of E. A. Hill, removed. · TUESDAY, JULY 2,.1957 ILLINOIS SOUTH DAKOTA Wayne W. Bird, Galatia, Ill., in place of · Robert G. Chase, Parker, S. Dak., in place The House met at 12 o'clock noon. L. L. Riegel, retired. of G. L. Egan, retired. The Chaplain, Rev. Bernard Braskamp, Robert C. Peterson, Lynn Center, Ill., in D. D., ottered the following prayer: place of R. L. Peterson, retired. TENNESSEE Charles R. Simmons, Venice, 111., in place Lee N. Ruch, Belvidere, Tenn., in place of O Thou eternal and gracious spirit, of D. J. Hallissey; deceased. Clyde Zimmerman, transferred. we know that for guidance and under­ Charles Edwin Graves, Knoxville, Tenn., in standing, for patience and perseverance, INDIANA place of A. S. Garrett, retired. Harlan C. Pedlow, Bridgeport, Ind., in place for joy and peace. we need the wisdom of L. L. Locke, retired. TEXAS and strength of the Lord God Almighty. Raymond P. Steele, Connersville, Ind., in Ernest H. Butts, Annona, Tex., in place of Grant that daily, in this Chamber, we place of R. E. Nelson, deceased. M. E. Russell, resigned. may· bear witness that we are coveting Paul R. Wadsworth, Rising Sun, Ind., in John Sleeper, Sr., Elm Mott, Tex., in place and cultivating earnestly those ideals place of C. E. Pendry, resigned. of T. F. Gassaway, retired. and principles which are curative and Gerald J.
    [Show full text]