Lower Ellis Group (M. Jurassic), Wyoming and Montana, U.S.A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Sedimentary Geology 177 (2005) 175–194 www.elsevier.com/locate/sedgeo Mixed sediment deposition in a retro-arc foreland basin: Lower Ellis Group (M. Jurassic), Wyoming and Montana, U.S.A. William C. ParcellT, Monica K. Williams Department of Geology, Wichita State University, 1845 Fairmount, Box 27, Wichita, KS 67260-0027, USA Received 28 January 2004; received in revised form 17 January 2005; accepted 25 February 2005 Abstract The blowerQ Ellis Group (M. Jurassic) of northern Wyoming and southern Montana affords an excellent opportunity to examine the influence of tectonics, sea-level change, and incipient topography on facies dynamics and the evolution of mixed sediment ramp deposits. The Sawtooth, Piper, and Gypsum Spring formations (Bajocian to Callovian) represent sedimentation along the forebulge of a retro-arc foreland basin. The blowerQ Ellis Group records deposition during two transgressive– regressive cycles, (1) a Bajocian-age cycle dominated by evaporites and red shales, and (2) a Bathonian-age cycle characterized by carbonates, evaporites, and red shales. These cycles are capped by a Callovian-age cycle distinguished by carbonates and red shales that is represented by the blowerQ Sundance and Rierdon Formations. Transgressive episodes favored intensified chemical sediment production resulting in thick units deposited in subtidal to peritidal environments. Regressive periods are characterized by supratidal redbed progradation and subsequent shallowing–upward cycles. The depositional cycles in the lower Ellis Group developed due the interplay between sea-level change and tectonic subsidence related to the evolution of a retro-arc foreland basin. Differential subsidence before, during, and after deposition created paleohighs that locally influenced accommodation space and, thereby, complicated depositional and erosional patterns. This paper provides a regional framework for further analysis of the depositional history of the lower Ellis Group by addressing the stratigraphic relationships between the Sawtooth, Piper, and Gypsum Spring Formations. D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Clastic; Carbonate; Evaporite; Sequence stratigraphy; Jurassic 1. Introduction changes in a relatively predicable manner (Burchette and Wright, 1992; Azeredo et al., 2002). Although the Mixed siliciclastic and chemical deposits in ramp controls on depositional facies patterns in passive settings have been shown to respond to sea-level systems are well documented, there are few published studies of the effects of local tectonic movements on mixed sediment depositional systems. However, this T Corresponding author. situation is recorded during the Middle Jurassic in the E-mail address: [email protected] (W.C. Parcell). Western Interior of the United States where local 0037-0738/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.02.007 176 W.C. Parcell, M.K. Williams / Sedimentary Geology 177 (2005) 175–194 tectonic movements related to the evolution of a retro- character of the Middle Jurassic section. However, arc foreland basin influenced depositional and ero- Kilbarda and Loope (1997) and Kvale et al. (2001) sional patterns in a restricted ramp setting. have recently demonstrated that certain beds within This paper presents a depositional model to the Sundance and Gypsum Spring Formations are also examine the influence of tectonics, sea-level change, lagoonal to terrestrial in origin owing to the identi- and incipient topography on facies dynamics and fication of aeolian limestone and dinosaur tracks. evolution of the mixed sediment Sawtooth, Piper, and Lithologies in the lower units of the Ellis Group Gypsum Spring formations. This is achieved using vary widely depending on location in the basin and lithofacies distribution, bounding surfaces, and bio- their position relative to paleostructures. The Saw- stratigraphic zones within a sequence stratigraphic tooth Formation in western Montana varies between framework. limestone, dolomite, shale, siltstone, and sandstone. Cobban (1945) divided the Sawtooth Formation into three units: (1) a basal sandstone/siltstone unit, (2) a 2. Geologic setting middle limestone/shale unit, and (3) an upper shale/ siltstone unit. Lithologies in southern and eastern The early Mesozoic was a time of great change for Montana are dominated by carbonates and evaporites. western North America as the continental margin For these reasons, Imlay et al. (1948) defined the evolved from largely passive depositional systems Piper Formation from exposures near Lewiston, during most of the Paleozoic to tectonically-active Montana. The Piper is divided into three units (this basins in the early Mesozoic. A major shift in plate time given formal member status): (1) Tampico Shale motions resulted in highly oblique convergence Member, (2) Firemoon Limestone Member, and (3) between the ancestral Pacific plates and the North Bowes Member (Nordquist, 1955). The Gypsum American plate (Fig. 1). This intersection resulted in Spring Formation of Wyoming is also informally complex compressional, tensional, and transtensional divided into three major lithologic units based on forces, which produced a wide variety of depositional lithology and regional continuity of strata. The basal settings across the western North American plate unit contains predominantly white, massive gypsum including passive margin coastal plains to active or anhydrite with interbedded noncalcareous red shale margin mountains, arcs, and tectonic basins (Blakey, and siltstone. The middle unit contains interbedded 1997). The Middle and Upper Jurassic deposits of green–gray to varicolored shales and gray, black, and Wyoming and Montana record at least four major brown limestones. The informal upper unit contains transgressive–regressive marine inundations related to primarily red to gray shale and siltstone. the development of a retro-arc foreland basin that was connected to the proto-Pacific Ocean (Fig. 1)(Peter- 2.1. The correlation quandary son, 1954; Brenner and Peterson, 1994). With the onset of thrust faulting during the Middle Jurassic, a Before discussion of the depositional evolution of foredeep developed in present-day Utah and eastern the blowerQ Ellis Group, the enduring problem of Idaho depositing the Twin Creek Formation. To the stratigraphic correlation of these units must be east of this trough, the foreland basin was charac- addressed. Two fundamental challenges persist. First, terized by a ramp margin along the western edge of a there is inconsistent use of the names bGypsum cratonic forebulge (Fig. 2). Spring FormationQ and bPiper FormationQ because Sediments deposited on this forebulge are repre- their formal type sections are recognized as incom- sented in northern Wyoming by the Gypsum Spring plete and not representative of the units across much Formation, blowerQ Sundance Formation, and bupperQ of Wyoming and Montana (Rayl, 1956; Meyer, 1984; Sundance Formation. In southern Montana, the cycles Williams, 2003).ThetypesectionofthePiper correspond to the Sawtooth Formation, Piper For- Formation near Lewiston, Montana, as defined by mation, Rierdon Formation, and Swift Formation Imlay (1948) represents only the upper third of the (Fig. 3). Early interpretations by Cobban (1945) and units that are commonly referred to as the Piper Peterson (1955) emphasized the shallow marine Formation elsewhere in Montana (Rayl, 1956). The W.C. Parcell, M.K. Williams / Sedimentary Geology 177 (2005) 175–194 177 SIBERIA NORTH EUROPE AMERICA AFRICA SOUTH AMERICA INDIA ANTARCTICA AUSTRALIA Proto-Pacific Ocean volcanic is Figure 2 lands transf land orm z shallow shelf one deep marine subduction zone thrust front (M. Jurassic) Fig. 1. Regional Middle Jurassic paleogeography of the western North America. The early Mesozoic convergence between the ancestral Pacific plates and the North American plate produced a wide variety of depositional settings across the western North American plate including passive margin coastal plains to active margin mountains, arcs, and tectonic basins. The blowerQ Ellis Group was deposited in an epicontinental sea related to the development of a retro-arc foreland basin (modified from Blakey and Umhoefer, 2003; Allen et al., 2000). 178 W.C. Parcell, M.K. Williams / Sedimentary Geology 177 (2005) 175–194 Belt Williston Jurassic Basin Island iv Middle Middle ii rough rding T A during HHardina g rch iii n ArchA rida i She thrustin h A' g limit of u ouo rn r T k easte e e r land C ximate n i w T shallow shelf appro deep marine A A' fold-thrust wedge belt top foredeep forebulge iiiiii iv Sheridan Arch Twin Creek Trough active retro-arc foreland basin Harding Trough Fig. 2. Paleogeography of study area with generalized cross-section across retro-arc foreland basin (A–AV). Twin Creek Formation (i) was deposited within the western foredeep and the Sawtooth Formation (ii), Gypsum Spring Formation (iii), and Piper Formation (iv) represent deposition across the shallow foredeep and forebulge. Stratigraphic comparison of these formations is examined in Fig. 3. type section of the Gypsum Spring at Red Creek in the van (1978) and O’Sullivan and Piperingos (1997) Owl Creek Mountains, as defined by Love (1939, recognized regional unconformities by these chert 1945), is also incomplete. The Red Creek section lags and named them J-0, J-1, J-2, J-3, and J-4 (Fig. represents only the lower third of the section that is 1). These horizons have been widely reported commonly identified as the