Incised Valley-Fill System Development and Stratigraphic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Incised Valley-Fill System Development and Stratigraphic INCISED VALLEY-FILL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND STRATIGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS KOOTENAI FORMATION, NORTHWEST MONTANA by Casey Ryan Reid A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2015 ©COPYRIGHT by Casey Ryan Reid 2015 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership and Vecta Oil and Gas for the financial and technical support received during this project. I would also like to thank my committee Dr. Jim Schmitt, Dr. Dave Bowen and Dr. Dave Lageson for their support and guidance throughout the duration of this thesis. Montana State University and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists are also acknowledged for financial support received and continued excellence in the geosciences. Without the support of my family and friends this project would surely never have been completed. While I am indebted to numerous people a number of specific words of thanks are necessary: to my parents whose love, guidance, and unwavering encouragement has never yielded, to my sisters who always supplied a welcome break from work and to my fellow geoscientists Jack Borksi, Nick Atwood, Nate Corbin, Ryan Hillier, and Colter Anderson. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES, & SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY ...........................1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................1 Objectives ........................................................................................................................5 Significance of study ........................................................................................................5 2. REGIONAL SETTING ...................................................................................................7 Introduction ......................................................................................................................7 Study Area .......................................................................................................................7 Tectonic Setting .............................................................................................................10 North American Cordilleran Orogeny and Foreland Basin System ......................10 Sweetgrass Arch .....................................................................................................15 Sweetgrass Hills .....................................................................................................16 Pendroy Fault Zone ................................................................................................17 Lithostratigraphy ............................................................................................................19 Introduction ............................................................................................................19 Ellis Group (Je) ......................................................................................................19 Sawtooth Formation (Jswt) ....................................................................................19 Rierdon Formation (Jr) ..........................................................................................21 Swift Formation (Jsw) ...........................................................................................22 Morrison Formation (Jmr) .....................................................................................22 Kootenai Formation (Kk) .......................................................................................23 Blackleaf Formation (Kbl) .....................................................................................25 Oil and Gas Fields ..........................................................................................................26 Fred & George Creek Oil and Gas Field ...............................................................26 Kevin-Sunburst Oil and Gas Field .........................................................................28 3. DATA AND METHODS ..............................................................................................30 Introduction ....................................................................................................................30 Geophysical Well Logs ..........................................................................................30 Drill Core ...............................................................................................................34 Outcrop ..................................................................................................................36 Thin Sections .........................................................................................................36 Portable X-ray Fluorescence ..................................................................................37 Data Assumptions ..................................................................................................39 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS - CONTINUED 4. LITHOFACIES, FACIES ASSOCIATIONS, AND ELECTROFACIES .....................41 Introduction ....................................................................................................................41 Lithofacies ......................................................................................................................42 Facies F1: (Cglm.) .................................................................................................42 Hydrodynamic Interpretation .................................................................................46 Facies F2: (St) ........................................................................................................46 Hydrodynamic Interpretation .................................................................................46 Facies F3: (Sp) .......................................................................................................48 Hydrodynamic Interpretation .................................................................................48 Facies F4: (Sr) ........................................................................................................48 Hydrodynamic Interpretation .................................................................................51 Facies F5: (Sh) .......................................................................................................51 Hydrodynamic Interpretation .................................................................................51 Facies F6: (Sm) ......................................................................................................53 Hydrodynamic Interpretation .................................................................................53 Facies F7: (SFh) .....................................................................................................53 Hydrodynamic Interpretation .................................................................................55 Facies F8: (Fm) ......................................................................................................55 Hydrodynamic Interpretation .................................................................................55 Facies F9: (P) .........................................................................................................58 Hydrodynamic Interpretation .................................................................................58 Facies Associations, Depositional Processes, and Interpretation ..................................58 Facies Association FA1: (Shoreface lower to middle) ..........................................58 Interpretation ..........................................................................................................60 Facies Association FA2: (Fluvial Channel Fill) ....................................................60 Interpretation ..........................................................................................................64 Estuarine System ............................................................................................................64 Facies Association FA3: (Bayhead Delta) .............................................................66 Interpretation ..........................................................................................................66 Facies Association FA4: (Central Basin Mud) ......................................................67 Interpretation ..........................................................................................................67 Facies Association FA5: (Mouth Sand Bodies) .....................................................67 Interpretation ..........................................................................................................68 Facies Association FA6: (Tidal Flat) .....................................................................68 Interpretation ..........................................................................................................70 Alluvial Plain System ....................................................................................................70 Facies Association FA7: (Flood Plain Deposits) ...................................................70 Interpretation ..........................................................................................................72 Facies Association FA8: (Channel
Recommended publications
  • Taphonomy of the Sun River Bonebed, Late Cretaceous
    TAPHONOMY OF THE SUN RIVER BONEBED, LATE CRETACEOUS (CAMPANIAN) TWO MEDICINE FORMATION OF MONTANA by Benjamin Andrew Scherzer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY-BOZEMAN Bozeman, Montana April 2008 © COPYRIGHT by Benjamin Andrew Scherzer 2008 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Benjamin Andrew Scherzer This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the Division of Graduate Education. Dr. David J. Varricchio Approved for the Department of Earth Sciences Dr. Stephan G. Custer Approved for the Division of Graduate Education Dr. Carl A. Fox iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment for the requirements for a master’s degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copying is allowed only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Request for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Benjamin Andrew Scherzer April 2008 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have come to completion without the help of each member of my committee: Dave Varricchio, Jack Horner, and Jim Schmitt.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Mineralogy and Diagenesis on Reservoir Quality of the Lower Cretaceous Upper Mannville Formation (Alberta, Canada)
    Impact of Mineralogy and Diagenesis on Reservoir Quality of the Lower Cretaceous Upper Mannville Formation (Alberta, Canada). R. Deschamps, Eric Kohler, M. Gasparrini, O. Durand, T. Euzen, Fati Nader To cite this version: R. Deschamps, Eric Kohler, M. Gasparrini, O. Durand, T. Euzen, et al.. Impact of Mineralogy and Diagenesis on Reservoir Quality of the Lower Cretaceous Upper Mannville Formation (Alberta, Canada).. Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles, Institut Français du Pétrole, 2012, 67 (1), pp.31-58. 10.2516/ogst/2011153. hal-00702841 HAL Id: hal-00702841 https://hal-ifp.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00702841 Submitted on 31 May 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ogst110074_Deschamps 22/02/12 14:54 Page 31 Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, Vol. 67 (2012), No. 1, pp. 31-58 Copyright © 2012, IFP Energies nouvelles DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2011153 Dossier Diagenesis - Fluid-Rocks Interactions Diagenèse minérale - Équilibres fluides-roches Impact of Mineralogy and Diagenesis on Reservoir Quality of the Lower Cretaceous Upper Mannville Formation (Alberta, Canada) R. Deschamps1*, E. Kohler1, M. Gasparrini1, O. Durand2, T. Euzen3 and F.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Geochemistry of the Lower Cretaceous
    Petroleum Geochemistry of the Lower Cretaceous Mannville and Jurassic Ellis Groups, Southern Alberta, Canada Kim Manzano-Kareah *, Shell International Exploration and Production, Houston, USA [email protected] The variation of oil quality in southern Alberta, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, Canada is primarily due to differences in oils generated from different source rocks and biodegradation of oils in reservoirs. 280 oil samples were collected and analysed by GC and GC-MS, in order to assess the nature and extent of these petroleum systems. Oils from Lower Cretaceous Mannville and Jurassic Ellis Group reservoirs in southern Alberta, Canada (T1-40; R1-25W5) were generated from at least five different source rocks. The proven/probable source rocks include: the Devonian Duvernay Formation (Family D), the Devonian-Mississippian Exshaw Formation (Family E), a probable Paleozoic source (Family M), a probable Jurassic source (Rierdon/Fernie shales; Family F), and the Cretaceous Ostracod Zone (Family Q). Family D oils are restricted to the northernmost part of the study area (Provost field). Biodegradation and the mixing of degraded with non-degraded oils are the main factors controlling the variation in oil quality within a given family. The much improved understanding of oil families and degree of biodegradation allow for more accurate mapping of likely oil migration pathways. Known reservoir trends, subcrop edges, structure, hydrodynamics, the distribution and quality of known oil pools can all be integrated into mapping migration paths. This allows for more accurate mapping of likely oil and gas migration pathways, which can be used for prospect risking and for the ranking of exploration plays.
    [Show full text]
  • North-Central Montana
    Petrology of the Eagle Sandstone, Bearpaw Mountains Area, North-Central Montana By DONALD L. GAUTIER INVESTIGATIONS OF SHALLOW GAS RESERVOIRS IN THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1521 Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. Depart1Tl£nt of Energy Composition and burial history of an important conventional shallow methane reservoir in the northern Great Plains UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data . Gautier, Donald L. Petrology of the Eagle Sandstone, Bearpaw Mountains area, north-central Montana. (Investigations of shallow gas reservoirs in the northern Great Plains) (Geological Survey Bulletin 1521) Bibliography: p. 52 1. Sandstone-Montana-Bearpaw Mountains region. 2. Gas, Natural-Geology­ Montana-Bearpaw Mountains region. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: Geological Survey Bulletin 1521. QE75.B9 no. 1521 [QE471.15.S25] 557.3s 81-607963 [552'.5] AACR2 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Absuact:---------------------------------------------------- 1 In~uction------------------------------------------------- 2 ~~un~--------------------------------------------- 4 Acknowledgments-------------------------------------- 5 Geologic Setting----------------------------------- 6 Hydrocarbons in the Eagle Sandstone------------------------ 8 Lithology----------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Height Stratification Among the Herbivorous
    Mallon et al. BMC Ecology 2013, 13:14 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/13/14 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Feeding height stratification among the herbivorous dinosaurs from the Dinosaur Park Formation (upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada Jordan C Mallon1,5*, David C Evans2, Michael J Ryan3 and Jason S Anderson4 Abstract Background: Herbivore coexistence on the Late Cretaceous island continent of Laramidia has been a topic of great interest, stemming from the paradoxically high diversity and biomass of these animals in relation to the relatively small landmass available to them. Various hypotheses have been advanced to account for these facts, of which niche partitioning is among the most frequently invoked. However, despite its wide acceptance, this hypothesis has not been rigorously tested. This study uses the fossil assemblage from the Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta as a model to investigate whether niche partitioning facilitated herbivorous dinosaur coexistence on Laramidia. Specifically, the question of feeding height stratification is examined in light of the role it plays in facilitating modern ungulate coexistence. Results: Most herbivorous dinosaur species from the Dinosaur Park Formation were restricted to feeding no higher than approximately 1 m above the ground. There is minimal evidence for feeding height partitioning at this level, with ceratopsids capable of feeding slightly higher than ankylosaurs, but the ecological significance of this is ambiguous. Hadrosaurids were uniquely capable of feeding up to 2 m quadrupedally, or up to 5 m bipedally. There is no evidence for either feeding height stratification within any of these clades, or for change in these ecological relationships through the approximately 1.5 Ma record of the Dinosaur Park Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mannville Group of Saskatchewan
    Saskatchewan Report 223 Industry and Resources Saskatchewan Geological Survey Jura-Cretaceous Success Formation and Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group of Saskatchewan J.E. Christopher 2003 19 48 Printed under the authority of the Minister of Industry and Resources Although the Department of Industry and Resources has exercised all reasonable care in the compilation, interpretation, and production of this report, it is not possible to ensure total accuracy, and all persons who rely on the information contained herein do so at their own risk. The Department of Industry and Resources and the Government of Saskatchewan do not accept liability for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies that may be included in, or derived from, this report. Cover: Clearwater River Valley at Contact Rapids (1.5 km south of latitude 56º45'; latitude 109º30'), Saskatchewan. View towards the north. Scarp of Middle Devonian Methy dolomite at right. Dolomite underlies the Lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation outcrops recessed in the valley walls. Photo by J.E. Christopher. Additional copies of this digital report may be obtained by contacting: Saskatchewan Industry and Resources Publications 2101 Scarth Street, 3rd floor Regina, SK S4P 3V7 (306) 787-2528 FAX: (306) 787-2527 E-mail: [email protected] Recommended Citation: Christopher, J.E. (2003): Jura-Cretaceous Success Formation and Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group of Saskatchewan; Sask. Industry and Resources, Report 223, CD-ROM. Editors: C.F. Gilboy C.T. Harper D.F. Paterson RnD Technical Production: E.H. Nickel M.E. Opseth Production Editor: C.L. Brown Saskatchewan Industry and Resources ii Report 223 Foreword This report, the first on CD to be released by the Petroleum Geology Branch, describes the geology of the Success Formation and the Mannville Group wherever these units are present in Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana
    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
    [Show full text]
  • Physical and Numerical Modeling of SAGD Under New Well Configurations
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013-09-23 Physical and Numerical Modeling of SAGD Under New Well Configurations Tavallali, Mohammad Tavallali, M. (2013). Physical and Numerical Modeling of SAGD Under New Well Configurations (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27348 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/1002 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Physical and Numerical Modeling of SAGD Under New Well Configurations by Mohammad Tavallali A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL & PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2013 © Mohammad Tavallali, 2013 ii ABSTRACT This research was aimed at investigating the effect of well configuration on SAGD performance and developing a methodology for optimizing the well configurations for different reservoir characteristics. The role of well configuration in determining the performance of SAGD operations was investigated with help of numerical and physical models. Since mid 1980’s, SAGD process feasibility has been field tested in many successful pilots and subsequently through several commercial projects in various bitumen and heavy oil reservoirs. Although SAGD has been demonstrated to be technically successful and economically viable, it still remains very energy intensive, extremely sensitive to geological and operational conditions, and an expensive oil recovery mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction Du Branch Patrimoine De I'edition
    EVOLUTION AND SUBSIDENCE MECHANISMS OF THE NORTHERN CORDILLERAN FORELAND BASIN DURING THE MIDDLE CRETACEOUS by Yongtai Yang A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Geology In the University of Toronto © copyright by Yongtai Yang (2008) Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-44730-7 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-44730-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial to W.A. “Bill” Cobban (1916–2015) NEAL L
    Memorial to W.A. “Bill” Cobban (1916–2015) NEAL L. LARSON Larson Paleontology Unlimited, LLC, Keystone, South Dakota 57745, USA; [email protected] NEIL H. LANDMAN American Museum of Natural History, Division of Paleontology (Invertebrates), New York, New York 10024, USA; [email protected] STEPHEN C. HOOK Atarque Geologic Consulting, LLC, Socorro, New Mexico 87810, USA; [email protected] Dr. W.A. “Bill” Cobban, one of the most highly re- spected, honored and published geologist-paleontologists of all time, passed away peacefully in his sleep in the morning of 21 April 2015 at the age of 98 in Lakewood, Colorado. Bill was an extraordinary field collector, geologist, stratigrapher, biostratigrapher, paleontologist, and mapmaker who spent nearly his entire life working for the U.S. Geo- logical Survey (USGS). In a career that spanned almost 75 years, he fundamentally changed our understanding of the Upper Cretaceous Western Interior through its fossils, making it known throughout the world. William Aubrey “Bill” Cobban was born in 1916 near Great Falls, Montana. As a teenager, he discovered a dinosaur in the Kootenai Formation catching the attention of Barnum Brown, premier dinosaur collector at the American Museum of Natural History, where the dinosaur now resides. A few years later, as Bill told, he read about the discovery of fossil bones in Shelby, Montana, during excavation of the Toole County Courthouse. The bones turned out to actually be baculites and other iridescent ammonites. These ammonites made such an impression on Bill they would change his life forever. He attended Montana State University in 1936, where he met a geology professor who encouraged an already developing love for geology and paleontology and received his B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterson, A., Schmidt, D., Valdes, P., Holroyd, PA, Nicholson, DB
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Explore Bristol Research Waterson, A. , Schmidt, D., Valdes, P., Holroyd, P. A., Nicholson, D. B., Farnsworth, A., & Barrett, P. (2016). Modelling the climatic niche of turtles: a deep-time perspective. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283, [20161408]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1408 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1098/rspb.2016.1408 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via The Royal Society at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1408. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms 1 Title: Modelling the climatic niche of turtles: a deep-time perspective 2 3 Authors: Amy M. Waterson1,2, Daniela N. Schmidt1, Paul J. Valdes2, Patricia A. Holroyd3, 4 David B. Nicholson4, Alexander Farnsworth2 & Paul M. Barrett4 5 6 Author affiliations: 7 1School of Earth Sciences, Wills Memorial Building, University of Bristol, Queens Road, 8 Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK. 9 2School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol, BS8 1SS, 10 UK. 11 3Museum of Paleontology, University of California, 1101 Valley Life Science Building, 12 Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
    [Show full text]