DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Circulator Instructions – Gathering Signatures for a Partisan Candidate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Circulator Instructions – Gathering Signatures for a Partisan Candidate 2020 Circulator Instructions – Gathering Signatures for a Partisan Candidate Assemble Petition Packets Each candidate will receive a petition packet template, and they will use the template to make petition packets. This template will have three pages similar to the examples below. Each packet must be bound with staples, stitching, or spiral binding in at least three places across the top. 1. Cover page 2. Signature page 3. Circulator verification page (there may be up to 50 signature pages per packet) (to be filled out by the petition circulator) Rules and Requirements for Circulators • You must be physically present when an individual signs the petition. • You must verify that a person signs only for his or her self and not for another person. • You must fill out the circulator verification page of every petition packet you circulate. • You must be at least 18 years of age and a resident of Utah to circulate packets. If you are not registered to vote in Utah, you may be asked by an election official for proof of age and/or residency. • If you would like to sign the petition, you cannot sign a signature page of a packet that you circulate. You must sign the packet of another circulator. • Petition packets must be bound prior to circulation. Rearranging packet pages after they have been bound will disqualify all signatures within the packet. • Falsifying petition signatures is a crime. Violations will be forwarded to the appropriate prosecutorial entity. Gathering Signatures Who can sign a candidate petition packet? • Registered voters who: o live in the candidate’s district, and o who are allowed to vote in the candidate’s party’s primary Which voters are permitted to vote in each party’s regular primary election? • Constitution Party: only voters affiliated with the Constitution Party • Democratic Party: only voters affiliated with the Democratic Party and unaffiliated voters • Green Party: only voters affiliated with the Green Party • Independent American Party: only voters affiliated with the Independent American Party and unaffiliated voters • Libertarian Party: only voters affiliated with the Libertarian Party • Republican Party: only voters affiliated with the Republican Party • United Utah Party: all voters, regardless of party affiliation How many signatures does a candidate need? • U.S. House: 7,000 signatures • Governor, Attorney General, State Auditor, State Treasurer: 28,000 • Utah State Senate: 2,000 signatures • Utah State House: 1,000 signatures • State School Board: 3% residents of a qualified political party who are residents of the applicable State Board of Education district Additional Offices Constitution Democratic Green Independent Libertarian Republican United American Utah State School Board - - - - - - - __ County Office - - - - - - - What are some reasons a signature may not be valid? • The signer is not registered to vote • The voter is registered to vote outside of the candidate’s district or area • The voter has already signed for the same candidate or for another candidate for the same office • The voter is not registered with a political party that is eligible to sign the petition Submitting the Petition Packets • Check with the candidate to determine how to submit petition signatures. Please note that a candidate’s initial petition submission must contain enough signatures to meet or exceed the signature requirement. For example, if the candidate needs 1,000 signatures, their initial submission must contain at least 1,000 signatures. • A candidate may submit supplemental signatures prior to the deadline if their original packet submission did not have enough valid signatures. • The last day to submit original petition packets or supplemental packets is 14 days before the political party’s convention (by 5:00 p.m.). DISCLAIMER: This document is not substitute for the Utah State Code or Utah Rules. This document is provided as a guide and is not intended to be an authoritative statement of law. For further legal information, please consult the Utah State Code or other appropriate legal resources. Office of the Lieutenant Governor Phone: 801-538-1041 ___ County Clerk/Auditor Phone: 000-000-0000 Utah State Capitol Fax: 801-538-1133 Insert Address Email: [email protected] 350 North State Street, Suite 220 Email: [email protected] P.O. Box 142325 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Utah's Official Voter Information Pamphlet
    UTAH’S OFFICIAL VOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET 2018 GENERAL ELECTION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6TH NOTE: This electronic version of the voter information pamphlet contains general voting information for all Utah voters. To view voting information that is specific to you, visit VOTE.UTAH.GOV, enter your address, and click on “Sample Ballot, Profiles, Issues.” For audio & braille versions of the voter information pamphlet, please visit blindlibrary.utah.gov. STATE OF UTAH OFFICE OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR SPENCER J. COX LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Dear Utah Voter, My office is pleased to present the 2018 Voter Information Pamphlet. Please take the time to read through the material to learn more about the upcoming General Election on November 6, 2018. Inside you will find information about candidates, ballot questions, judges, and how to vote. In addition to this pamphlet, you can visit VOTE.UTAH.GOV to find even more information about the election. At VOTE.UTAH.GOV you can view your sample ballot, find your polling location, and view biographies for the candidates in your area. If you need assistance of any kind, please call us at 1-800-995-VOTE, email [email protected], or stop by our office in the State Capitol building. Thank you for doing your part to move our democracy forward. Sincerely, Spencer J. Cox Lieutenant Governor WHAT’S IN THIS PAMPHLET? 1. WHO ARE THE CANDIDATES? 2 U.S. Senate 3 U.S. House of Representatives 5 Utah State Legislature 9 Utah State Board of Education 28 2. WHAT ARE THE QUESTIONS ON MY BALLOT? 30 Constitutional Amendment A 32 Constitutional Amendment B 35 Constitutional Amendment C 39 Nonbinding Opinion Question Number 1 44 Proposition Number 2 45 Proposition Number 3 66 Proposition Number 4 74 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860
    PRESERVING THE WHITE MAN’S REPUBLIC: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM, 1847-1860 Joshua A. Lynn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Harry L. Watson William L. Barney Laura F. Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Michael Lienesch © 2015 Joshua A. Lynn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joshua A. Lynn: Preserving the White Man’s Republic: The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860 (Under the direction of Harry L. Watson) In the late 1840s and 1850s, the American Democratic party redefined itself as “conservative.” Yet Democrats’ preexisting dedication to majoritarian democracy, liberal individualism, and white supremacy had not changed. Democrats believed that “fanatical” reformers, who opposed slavery and advanced the rights of African Americans and women, imperiled the white man’s republic they had crafted in the early 1800s. There were no more abstract notions of freedom to boundlessly unfold; there was only the existing liberty of white men to conserve. Democrats therefore recast democracy, previously a progressive means to expand rights, as a way for local majorities to police racial and gender boundaries. In the process, they reinvigorated American conservatism by placing it on a foundation of majoritarian democracy. Empowering white men to democratically govern all other Americans, Democrats contended, would preserve their prerogatives. With the policy of “popular sovereignty,” for instance, Democrats left slavery’s expansion to territorial settlers’ democratic decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters Trim Candidates for Nov. 7 Election
    FRONT PAGE A1FRONT PAGE A1 Stockton residents celebrate See A10 TOOELETRANSCRIPT SERVING TOOELE COUNTY BULLETIN SINCE 1894 THURSDAY August 17, 2017 www.TooeleOnline.com Vol. 124 No. 23 $1.00 Salty fast cars Bonneville Salt Debbie Winn Steve Pruden Brent Marshall Mike Colson Flats and Speed Week attract racers, visitors from Voters trim around the world MARK WATSON STAFF WRITER Students from ESTACA candidates Engineering School in Paris, France are on the Bonneville Salt Flats hoping to set a new Southern California Timing Association (SCTA) speed for Nov. 7 record for electric streamliners during Speed Week. “This is the first time in the United States for most of us,” said Lormeau Thiabault, who is studying to be an automotive Election Day engineer. He said about 30 students, TIM GILLIE many people cared enough to ages 20-24, helped design their STAFF WRITER vote,” said Winn. “I was over- “Electric Appeal” streamliner Voters in Tooele and whelmed by the support that I during the past three years. Grantsville cities went to the received. I don’t think we have About 18 of them made the polls Tuesday to trim the list of bad candidates, just people trip to the United States. candidates for the November with different experiences.” “The record for our class is general election. Pruden received 31 percent 213 mph, and we hope to hit Tooele City voters dropped of the vote in the three-way 230 mph tomorrow,” Thiabault councilman Dave McCall primary. said on Wednesday. from the mayoral ballot. They “I am grateful for my sup- He said the group’s current retained councilman Steve porters that stood by me top speed is 40 mph, but aims Pruden and councilwoman through the election,” Pruden Christian Mondera and to hit 75 mph on the rookie Debbie Winn as their mayoral said.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL ELECTIONS 2018: Election Results for the U.S. Senate and The
    FEDERAL ELECTIONS 2018 Election Results for the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives Federal Election Commission Washington, D.C. October 2019 Commissioners Ellen L. Weintraub, Chair Caroline C. Hunter, Vice Chair Steven T. Walther (Vacant) (Vacant) (Vacant) Statutory Officers Alec Palmer, Staff Director Lisa J. Stevenson, Acting General Counsel Christopher Skinner, Inspector General Compiled by: Federal Election Commission Public Disclosure and Media Relations Division Office of Communications 1050 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20463 800/424-9530 202/694-1120 Editors: Eileen J. Leamon, Deputy Assistant Staff Director for Disclosure Jason Bucelato, Senior Public Affairs Specialist Map Design: James Landon Jones, Multimedia Specialist TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface 1 Explanatory Notes 2 I. 2018 Election Results: Tables and Maps A. Summary Tables Table: 2018 General Election Votes Cast for U.S. Senate and House 5 Table: 2018 General Election Votes Cast by Party 6 Table: 2018 Primary and General Election Votes Cast for U.S. Congress 7 Table: 2018 Votes Cast for the U.S. Senate by Party 8 Table: 2018 Votes Cast for the U.S. House of Representatives by Party 9 B. Maps United States Congress Map: 2018 U.S. Senate Campaigns 11 Map: 2018 U.S. Senate Victors by Party 12 Map: 2018 U.S. Senate Victors by Popular Vote 13 Map: U.S. Senate Breakdown by Party after the 2018 General Election 14 Map: U.S. House Delegations by Party after the 2018 General Election 15 Map: U.S. House Delegations: States in Which All 2018 Incumbents Sought and Won Re-Election 16 II.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Annual Meeting PRELIMINARY PROGRAM Is
    Preliminary Program SPSA 2020 Annual Meeting San Juan, Puerto Rico v. 6.0 (1/10/20) 1100 1100 Registration Wednesday Wednesday Meetings 8:00am-6:00pm Flamingo Pre Foyer 1200 WSSR Workshop: Conducting Semi-structured Interviews Wednesday President's Special Panels 9:30am-1:50pm Flamingo A Chair Diana Gustafson, Memorial University 1200 1200 WSSR Workshop: Defining and Working with Concepts in the Social Sciences Wednesday President's Special Panels 9:30am-1:50pm Flamingo B Chair Frederic Schaffer, University of Massachusetts Amherst 1400 Exhibit Hall - Wednesday Wednesday Meetings 12:00pm-6:00pm Flamingo Foyer 1600 1600 WSSR Workshop: Conducting Semi-structured Interviews II Wednesday President's Special Panels 3:30pm-6:20pm Flamingo A Chair Diana Gustafson, Memorial University 2900 2900 Lactation Room - Thursday Thursday Meetings 7:00am-6:30pm Conference 2 2900 Registration - Thursday Thursday Meetings 7:00am-6:00pm Flamingo Pre Foyer 2100 2100 Causes and Consequences of Authoritarianism Thursday Public Opinion 8:00am-9:20am Ceiba Chair Le Bao, American University Participants Authoritarian Frames, Policy Preferences, and Vote Choice Katelyn Stauffer, University of South Carolina Lee Patrick Ellis, University of South Carolina Authoritarianism, Symbolic Racism, and Attitudes on the Colin Kaepernick Protests Kyla Stepp, Central Michigan University Jeremy Castle, Central Michigan University Hovering at the Polls: The relationship between helicopter behavior and political attitudes (and everything else). Christian Lindke, University of California,
    [Show full text]
  • Way We Were November 18, 2015 Thomas Kearns, More Than a Mine Owner Robert Gurss, Museum Volunteer Thomas Kearns May Be Remember
    Way We Were November 18, 2015 Thomas Kearns, More than a Mine Owner Robert Gurss, Museum volunteer Thomas Kearns may be remembered best in Park City as a wealthy mine owner (and namesake of an often clogged roadway). Less well known is his role as a U.S. Senator, newspaper publisher, and thorn in the side of Mormon Church hierarchy. Born in Ontario, Canada in 1862, and raised in Nebraska, Kearns arrived in Park City in 1883. He first worked as mucker in the mines and read geology books at night. Kearns and his partner, David Keith, established several extremely rich mine claims, providing the foundation of their Silver King Coalition Mine Company. Kearns became a millionaire before his 28th birthday. A Republican, Kearns' political career began with his election to the Park City Council in 1895. He was also a delegate to the Utah Constitutional Convention prior to statehood in 1896. At the time, U.S. Senators were elected by state legislatures rather than by popular vote and, in Utah, Mormon leaders could often dictate election results. However, in 1899, the legislature was deadlocked and adjourned without selecting a Senator. Two years later, the legislature tried again and elected Kearns. Though a Catholic, Kearns had the support of Lorenzo Snow, the president of the Mormon Church. Snow supported Kearns rather than Reed Smoot, a church apostle, to placate the national Republican Party, which had strong reservations about a Mormon Church official serving in Congress. There were later allegations that Kearns had gained Snow's support by agreeing to purchase and silence the then strongly anti-Mormon Salt Lake Tribune.
    [Show full text]
  • 1A United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Utah Republican Party and Utah Democratic Party V. SPENCER J. COX, in Hi
    1a United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Utah Republican Party and Utah Democratic Party v. SPENCER J. COX, in his official capacity as Lieutenant Governor of Utah, Nos. 16-4091/16-4098 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah (D.C. No. 2:16-CV-00038-DN) Marcus Mumford, Mumford Law, Salt Lake City, Utah, for Plaintiff-Appellant. David P. Billings, Fabian VanCott, Salt Lake City, Utah (Peter W. Billings and Charles A. Stormont, Fabian VanCott, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Clemens A. Landau, Zimmerman Jones Booher, Salt Lake City, Utah, with him on the briefs), for Plaintiff - Intervenor-Appellant. Tyler R. Green (Stanford E. Purser with him on the brief), Utah Attorney General’s Office, Salt Lake City, Utah, for Defendant-Appellee. Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, EBEL, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. 2a EBEL, Circuit Judge. These appeals are only the most recent volley in the spate of litigation that has dogged the Utah Elections Amendments Act of 2014, commonly known as SB54, since it was signed into law in March 2014. At issue here, SB54 reorganized the process for qualifying for a primary ballot in Utah, most importantly by providing an alternative signature- gathering path to the primary election ballot for candidates who are unable or unwilling to gain approval from the central party nominating conventions. Prior to the passage of SB54, the Utah Republican Party (“URP”) selected its candidates for primary elections exclusively through its state nominating convention, and it would prefer to continue to do so. In this litigation, the URP sued Utah Lieutenant Governor Spencer Cox in his official capacity (“the State”)1, alleging that two aspects of SB54 violate the URP’s freedom of association under the First Amendment, as applied to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Utah 2020 Candidate Manual
    State of Utah 2020 Candidate Manual A guide for federal, statewide executive, legislative, and state board of education candidates Published by: Office of the Utah Lieutenant Governor, Spencer J. Cox Updated: December, 9, 2019 Address: Utah State Capitol 350 North State Street, Suite 220 PO Box 142325 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Phone: (801) 538-1041 Email: [email protected] 1 Contents Online version: click on any section to jump to it Using this Manual 3 Campaign Finance & Reporting 27 About this manual 3 Who do I report my finances to? 27 Assistance 3 Opening a campaign bank account 28 Icons 3 Contributions 28 Expenditures 30 Reporting schedule & deadlines 31 Getting Started 4 How to report your campaign finances 33 Qualifications for office 4 Completing the financial ledger 34 Utah political parties 5 When to stop and start reporting 36 Selecting your path to office 6 Penalties & fines 37 Partisan Candidates 7 Other Useful Information 38 Convention Path 7 Campaign regulations 38 Get to know the system 7 Important election dates 41 Declaring candidacy 8 County clerk contact information 42 Attending your party’s convention 10 Single vs. multi-county districts 43 Gathering Signatures Path 11 Signature requirements 11 Declare intent to gather signatures 12 Gather signatures 12 Declare candidacy 14 Submit petition signatures 16 Unaffiliated Candidates 18 Signature requirements 18 Obtain petition template 18 Gather signatures 19 Verify signatures 20 Submit verified signatures 21 Declare candidacy 21 Write-in Candidates 23 Declaration of candidacy 23 Lieutenant Governor Candidates 25 Partisan candidates 25 Unaffiliated candidates 26 2 Using This Manual Disclaimer This guide is not a substitute for Utah State Code, and it is not intended to be a comprehensive or an authoritative statement of law.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contemporary Study to Determine the Perceived Influence of the Mormon Church on Utah Politics
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1973 Mormon Myth or Monopoly: A Contemporary Study to Determine the Perceived Influence of the Mormon Church on Utah Politics Douglas S. Foxley Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Foxley, Douglas S., "Mormon Myth or Monopoly: A Contemporary Study to Determine the Perceived Influence of the Mormon Church on Utah Politics" (1973). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7651. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7651 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MORMON MYTH OR MONOPOLY:A CONTEMPORARY STUDY TO DETERMINE THE PERCEIVED INFLUENCE OF THE MORMONCHURCH ON UTAH POLlTlCS by Douglas S. Foxley A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Political Science Utah State University Logan, Utah 1973 ii To My Parents, G. Melvin and Beth S. Foxley iii \CKNOWLEDGEMENTS In preparing this thesis, I am most grateful to my parents for their encouragement and support which has enabled me to complete this work. I especially appreciate Dr. Dan E. Jones, for his willingness to give of his time and talents in aiding me throughout this study. Also, I thank all of the members of the Department of Political Science for the help which they have given me through the years; and to the Bureau of Government and Opinion Research and its most competent secretary, Ellen Gertsch, I say thank ~ so much.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magazine Crusade Against the Mormon Church, 1910–19111
    ARTICLES AND ESSAYS “And Now It Is the Mormons”: The Magazine Crusade against the Mormon Church, 1910–19111 Kenneth L. Cannon II OneoftheproblemswithwhichtheAmericanpeoplewillsoon havetodealistherevivalofpolygamyinUtah....Mormon- ism without polygamy largely ceases to be Mormonism. Its whole theological system, from its conception of the Godhead down, is pervaded with sensualism. The Mormon god is not onlyajustandavengefulgod,butheisalustfulgod.—Burton J. Hendrick, “The Mormon Revival of Polygamy”2 These 375,000 [Mormons] have more political power than any million in the United States because they are a unit. There is little secession among them from the will of their leader, whom they believe divinely appointed to rule them in temporal as well as spiritual affairs. This political force, compact, unreasoning, unpatriotic, un-American, has a curious character, at once sin- ister and serene. It is the backbone of the Mormon empire, which is an echo from a time that antedates the Christian era.—Richard Barry, “The Political Menace of the Mormon Church”3 The name of the viper—I take it from the mouth of the viper–is “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.” It lies coiled on the country’s hearthstone, and asks only time to grow and collectapoisonandastrengthtostrike....Mormonism...is the Old Serpent, and the heel of every clean American should bruise its head. Its purpose is inimical, and it must either de- stroy or be destroyed. It is a political menace, a commercial men- ace.Mostofall,itisamoralmenace....Thebattleshould 1 2 DIALOGUE: AJOURNAL OF MORMON THOUGHT, 46, no. 1 (Spring 2013) continue until all of Mormonism and what it stands for are de- stroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Summary Report General Election Utah County - Utah November 06, 2018 All Contests and All Districts
    Page: 1 of 16 11/16/2018 3:05:25 PM Election Summary Report General Election Utah County - Utah November 06, 2018 All Contests and All Districts Registered Voters: 159,983 of 261,164 (61.26%) Ballots Cast: 159,983 STRAIGHT PARTY (Vote for 1) Total Times Cast 159,983 / 261,164 61.26% Candidate Party Total CONSTITUTION PARTY CON 184 UNITED UTAH PARTY UUP 111 LIBERTARIAN PARTY LIB 630 REPUBLICAN PARTY REP 34,838 GREEN PARTY GRN 134 DEMOCRATIC PARTY DEM 5,019 INDEPENDENT AMERICAN IAP 1,763 PARTY Total Votes 42,679 Total US SENATE (Vote for 1) Total Times Cast 159,983 / 261,164 61.26% Candidate Party Total TIM AALDERS CON 4,649 CRAIG R. BOWDEN LIB 3,914 REED C. MCCANDLESS IAP 1,403 JENNY WILSON DEM 24,306 MITT ROMNEY REP 123,485 Total Votes 157,758 Total GLADE G FITZGERALD WRITE-IN 0 RYAN DANIEL JACKSON WRITE-IN 1 CODY JUDY WRITE-IN 0 TYRONE JENSEN WRITE-IN 0 Page: 2 of 16 11/16/2018 3:05:25 PM US CONGRESSIONAL DIST. 3 (Vote for 1) Total Times Cast 130,582 / 213,082 61.28% Candidate Party Total JOHN CURTIS REP 99,367 JAMES COURAGE SINGER DEM 20,031 TIMOTHY L. ZEIDNER UUP 3,592 GREGORY C. DUERDEN IAP 3,721 Total Votes 126,711 Total US CONGRESSIONAL DIST. 4 (Vote for 1) Total Times Cast 29,401 / 48,082 61.15% Candidate Party Total MIA B. LOVE REP 21,153 BEN MCADAMS DEM 7,373 Total Votes 28,540 Total JONATHAN LARELE WRITE-IN 14 PETERSON STATE SENATE DIST.
    [Show full text]
  • Mormonism in Illinois 1839-1847: a Study of the Development of Socio-Religious ConIct
    Durham E-Theses Mormonism in Illinois 1839-1847: a study of the development of socio-religious conict Hampshire, Annette Pauline How to cite: Hampshire, Annette Pauline (1979) Mormonism in Illinois 1839-1847: a study of the development of socio-religious conict, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8109/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 ABSTRACT This thesis is a sociological account of the development of conflict between a religious group, the Mormons, and the society which acted as their host, mid nineteenth century Illinois. It traces the deterioration of the relationship between the Mormons and their host from one of friendly sympathy to one of open warfare, and seeks to explain this decline with the aid of sociological concepts. It does not attempt to put forward a theory of conflict, nor to give a history of Mormonism in Illinois.
    [Show full text]