DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparison Between Port of Rotterdam and Port of Amsterdam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparison Between Port of Rotterdam and Port of Amsterdam Simon Majtlis 10281738 Thesis: Economics & Finance Comparison between Port of Rotterdam and Port of Amsterdam Simon Majtlis, 10281738, Economics and Business – Economics & Finance Supervisor: Swapnil Singh Date: 01-04-2015 1 Simon Majtlis 10281738 Thesis: Economics & Finance Abstract This paper is a comparison between the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam. Both are ports of significant economic value within the Hamburg – Le Havre port region. The Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam act as important main ports for Western Europe in the fast moving and rapidly changing globalizing markets. Nevertheless, until now, relatively little (numerical) research on these ports has been conducted and published. For this paper we are researching whether the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam are creating synergy or negative competitiveness for one another. This research question is derived from a current OECD working paper by Merk & Notteboom (2013). The influence of general economic variables on port-specific variables is tested over the timespan 1980-2013. Data has been retrieved from the ports’, OECD’s and EUROSTAT’s databanks. By far not all data proofed usable for the concluding residual value correlation and suggestions for further research are made. Our research concluded that the answer to our main research question seems to be more of an expected future trend than a clearly outlined currently visible situation. Synergy between the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam is likely to occur as both ports aim to cooperate and in the future will be under even more competitive pressure. 2 Simon Majtlis 10281738 Thesis: Economics & Finance 1) Introduction Throughout past centuries the Netherlands has been a country of traders. From the Golden Age onwards this meant trading across oceans with own ships and ports. Nowadays, in the 21st century, this is still the case and the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam play an important role in Western-European transport economics. In the last fifty years the maritime industry has changed the shape of the world economy (Stopford, 2003). Revolutions such as mechanized bulk transport and containerization have in an impressive way contributed towards globalization. The Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam have both, irrespective of their size, profited from these developments. Throughout the last decades they have rapidly grown in size. Due to this growth both ports are now running up against their limits in terms of size (Port of Rotterdam, Wiegmans 2011) . With fierce competition in the Le Havre port range and changing global economic landscapes it is key for these ports to keep on developing and innovating. Not only for their own company profits but also for their contribution to local employment, regional economic impact and their fair contribution to the Dutch economy. To gain more market shares the Port of Rotterdam and the port of Amsterdam could compete each other or search for ways of synergy. As noted in Rotterdam’s Port Compass 2030: “Collaboration between the port of Rotterdam and other ports realizes advantage for customers and the community: this can be achieved by maximizing the use of resources and optimizing the usage of suitable waterways” (Port Compass 2030, 2011). This sounds positive and beneficial, nevertheless little is known about possible synergy or negative competition actually occurring between the Port of Rotterdam and the Port Amsterdam. The scope for this research will therefore be a competitiveness comparison between the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam. The specific research question is if the ports of Rotterdam and Amsterdam create synergy or negative competitiveness for one another? This study contributes in an empirical way to an OECD research by Merk & Notteboom (2013). Merk & Notteboom’s working paper tries to give an evaluation of the current performance of the ports of Rotterdam and Amsterdam. They also try to quantify the effect of the two ports on economic and environmental questions. Summarized, the main scope of their research consists of “attempting to identify the impact of ports on their territories and possible policies to increase the positive impacts of ports on these territories” (Merk & Notteboom, 2013). Besides the OECD research, even though maritime academic research is 3 Simon Majtlis 10281738 Thesis: Economics & Finance actively developing, little research has been performed on comparisons between the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam. Taking into account the effect both ports have on the Dutch economy this is remarkable. The lack of relevant research data in combination with the major positive economic effect of both ports gave cause for this thesis study. As will be elaborated further on, a general economic research method was applied to compare the ports of Rotterdam and Amsterdam. This general economic research method was chosen due to a lack of available port specific (statistical) research methods. By conducting extensive port- specific literature research a good direction was given on what data to collect in order to perform the research and answer our research question. The port-specific literature clarified which port-specific and general economic variables play an important role in measuring port performance. From there on, the necessary port-specific data was gathered by contacting the business intelligence units of the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam. Next to that, general economic variables used as independent variables were taken from databanks provided by the OECD and EUROSTAT. With all the data provided, this study step by step worked towards a residual value correlation determining similarities between both ports. When reviewing these final outcomes of our research, statistics showed that both the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam achieve most of their overall transhipment, and income, through the port-specific incoming transhipment variable. The relevant individual regressions and correlated residual values showed strong dependency on the Dutch imports. The Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam can thus mutually benefit from increasing Dutch imports. The exact (numerical) results of the research will be presented throughout the study; the remainder of this paper is therefore build up as follows. Section 2 discusses current academic maritime research and data. Section 3 presents the related literature. Section 4 gives the relevant variables and their underlying data. Section 5 provides the descriptive statistics, followed in section 6 and 7 with respectively the correlations and regression model. Section 8 concludes, discussing limitations of this study and giving suggestions to future research. 4 Simon Majtlis 10281738 Thesis: Economics & Finance Research question Do the ports of Rotterdam and Amsterdam create synergy or negative competitiveness for one another? Sub Research question Do the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam behave in the same cyclical direction when looking at important economically determining variables? 2) Current academic maritime research and data As stated by Palls, Vitsounis & de Langen (2010), in our rapidly growing globalizing economy there is an increase in maritime (port-specific) economic research taking place. This increase in maritime (port-specific) economic research can be explained by rapid developments in the port industry (increasing world trade, new technologies and increasing private involvement). This academic research is often of immediate relevance and challenges the conventional organization and classification of ports. However, despite the currently increasing amount of research, many studies still only focus on a specific port or terminal. Also, within these academic studies, only a small amount of research is actually based on commodities other than containers (Palls, Vitsounis & de Langen, 2010). Little attention is being given to the different possible (macro) economic effects of ports performing in the same region or country, for instance economic effects between ports (negative competitiveness vs. synergy) and other economic effects with a more general economical undertone. The latter for example being: the mutual effect of Dutch GDP on transhipment for both the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam. A relevant current research for this thesis is the OECD study by Merk & Notteboom (2013), which tries to explain port competitiveness between the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Amsterdam. They do so by emphasizing on the economic impact of both of these ports within their regions and on the Dutch economy. To clarify: data provided by the Port of Rotterdam for instance states that the Port of Rotterdam accounts for 3 % of the Dutch national income. Merk & Notteboom (2013) also speak of the importance of possible synergy between ports in a certain region or country. How the existence of such a synergy should be measured is however not explained or emphasized. Finding an appropriate way of researching this would thus definitely be a contribution to research and a useful scope for this research. 5 Simon Majtlis 10281738 Thesis: Economics & Finance Looking for a maritime economic framework to represent such a study, the following is of interest. When one takes Stopford’s (2003) writings on maritime economics, a significant amount of the graphical representations is derived from time-series correlations. Researching similar port-specific variables on a numerical statistical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maximizing Opportunities* at Your Port of Call a Practical Guide to Support Essential Business Decisions in the Port and Shipping Industry
    Transport & Logistics Maximizing Opportunities* at your port of call A practical guide to support essential business decisions in the port and shipping industry *connectedthinking PwC Industry knowledge is one of our most powerful differentiators* Maximizing opportunities at your port of call 2 Contents Introduction – Opportunities call for adequate strategic responses How PricewaterhouseCoopers can help Our integrated Transport and Logistics network Our practical and logical approach Market opportunities Capital investment opportunities Restructuring and privatization opportunities Performance improvement opportunities Networking opportunities Identifying new opportunities Our credentials Key contacts Political ENTRY BARRIERS Economic • supra-national legislation • physical constraints (land • growth Asia • environmental legislation availability, deep-sea access, …) • new EU member states • incentives & support • dedicated terminals • security • overcapacity SUPPLIERS INDUSTRY RIVALRY CUSTOMERS • energy costs • internal – external competition • alliances • low cost financing • captive – non-captive markets • increasing bargaining power • tendering • strategic alliances • growing vessel size • outsourcing • PPP • forward integration • service level agreements • globalization • clustering Social SUBSTITUTES Technology • sustainability - • rail transport • port community systems environmental restrictions • barge transport • track & trace – RFID • safety • pipelines • employment Some industry specific opportunity drivers structured in the
    [Show full text]
  • TU1206 COST Sub-Urban WG1 Report I
    Sub-Urban COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 Rotterdam TU1206-WG1-013 TU1206 COST Sub-Urban WG1 Report I. van Campenhout, K de Vette, J. Schokker & M van der Meulen Sub-Urban COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 COST TU1206 Sub-Urban Report TU1206-WG1-013 Published March 2016 Authors: I. van Campenhout, K de Vette, J. Schokker & M van der Meulen Editors: Ola M. Sæther and Achim A. Beylich (NGU) Layout: Guri V. Ganerød (NGU) COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) is a pan-European intergovernmental framework. Its mission is to enable break-through scientific and technological developments leading to new concepts and products and thereby contribute to strengthening Europe’s research and innovation capacities. It allows researchers, engineers and scholars to jointly develop their own ideas and take new initiatives across all fields of science and technology, while promoting multi- and interdisciplinary approaches. COST aims at fostering a better integration of less research intensive countries to the knowledge hubs of the European Research Area. The COST Association, an International not-for-profit Association under Belgian Law, integrates all management, governing and administrative functions necessary for the operation of the framework. The COST Association has currently 36 Member Countries. www.cost.eu www.sub-urban.eu www.cost.eu Rotterdam between Cables and Carboniferous City development and its subsurface 04-07-2016 Contents 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Road Infrastructure Cost and Revenue in Europe (April 2008)
    CECE Delft Delft SolutionsSolutions for for environment,environment, economyeconomy and and technology technology Oude Delft 180 Oude Delft 180 2611 HH Delft 2611The HH Netherlands Delft tel:The +31 Netherlands 15 2 150 150 tel: fax:+31 +31 15 2150 15 2 150 151 e-mail: [email protected] fax: +31 15 2150 151 website: www.ce.nl e-mail: [email protected] KvK 27251086 website: www.ce.nl KvK 27251086 Road infrastructure cost and revenue in Europe Produced within the study Internalisation Measures and Policies for all external cost of Transport (IMPACT) – Deliverable 2 Version 1.0 Report Karlsruhe/Delft, April 2008 Authors: Claus Doll (Fraunhofer-ISI) Huib van Essen (CE Delft) Publication Data Bibliographical data: Road infrastructure cost and revenue in Europe Produced within the study Internalisation Measures and Policies for all external cost of Transport (IMPACT) – Deliverable 2 Delft, CE, 2008 Transport / Infrastructure / Roads / EC / Costs / Policy / Taxes / Charges / Pricing / International / Regional Publication number: 08.4288.17 CE-publications are available from www.ce.nl Commissioned by: European Commission DG TREN. Further information on this study can be obtained from the contact Huib van Essen. © copyright, CE, Delft CE Delft Solutions for environment, economy and technology CE Delft is an independent research and consultancy organisation specialised in developing structural and innovative solutions to environmental problems. CE Delfts solutions are characterised in being politically feasible, technologically sound, economically prudent and socially
    [Show full text]
  • Map of the European Inland Waterway Network – Carte Du Réseau Européen Des Voies Navigables – Карта Европейской Сети Внутренних Водных Путей
    Map of the European Inland Waterway Network – Carte du réseau européen des voies navigables – Карта европейской сети внутренних водных путей Emden Berlin-Spandauer Schiahrtskanal 1 Берлин-Шпандауэр шиффартс канал 5.17 Delfzijl Эмден 2.50 Arkhangelsk Делфзейл Архангельск Untere Havel Wasserstraße 2 Унтере Хафель водный путь r e Teltowkanal 3 Тельтов-канал 4.25 d - O Leeuwarden 4.50 2.00 Леуварден Potsdamer Havel 4 Потсдамер Хафель 6.80 Groningen Harlingen Гронинген Харлинген 3.20 - 5.45 5.29-8.49 1.50 2.75 р водный п 1.40 -Оде . Papenburg 4.50 El ель r Wasserstr. Kemi Папенбург 2.50 be аф Ode 4.25 нканал Х vel- Кеми те Ha 2.50 юс 4.25 Luleå Belomorsk K. К Den Helder Küsten 1.65 4.54 Лулео Беломорск Хелдер 7.30 3.00 IV 1.60 3.20 1.80 E m О - S s Havel K. 3.60 eve Solikamsk д rn a е ja NE T HERLANDS Э р D Соликамск м Хафель-К. vin с a ная Б Север Дви 1 III Berlin е на 2 4.50 л IV B 5.00 1.90 о N O R T H S E A Meppel Берлин e м 3.25 l 11.00 Меппел o о - 3.50 m р 1.30 IV О с а 2 2 де - o к 4.30 р- прее во r 5.00 б Ш дн s о 5.00 3.50 ь 2.00 Sp ый k -Б 3.00 3.25 4.00 л ree- er Was п o а Э IV 3 Od ser .
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Port of Amsterdam's Circular
    sustainability Article The Role of Port Development Companies in Transitioning the Port Business Ecosystem; The Case of Port of Amsterdam’s Circular Activities Peter W. de Langen 1,* , Henrik Sornn-Friese 2 and James Hallworth 3 1 Copenhagen Business School, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark 2 Copenhagen Business School & Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore 188065, Singapore; [email protected] 3 Port of Amsterdam, Circular & Renewable Industry, 19406 Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 April 2020; Accepted: 25 May 2020; Published: 27 May 2020 Abstract: There is a gradual but clear transition towards a circular economy (CE) that will potentially have significant impacts on ports, both in their function as transport nodes and as locations for logistics and manufacturing activities. A rough appraisal of new investments in circular manufacturing activities in ports in Europe drawn from organizational reports and official webpages illustrates the (slow) development of circular activities in ports. This paper is to our knowledge the first paper which deals with the implications of CE for the business model of the port development company. We assess if and how the circularity transition affects the role and business model of port authorities as developers of port clusters. We outline a framework for analyzing the consequences of CE on the business model of the port authority. We then apply this framework to get a detailed understanding of the emerging CE ecosystem in the Port of Amsterdam, which is clearly a frontrunner in the transition, and the role of the government-owned Port of Amsterdam port development company (PoA) in developing this ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Strategy: “Taking the Lead”
    Strategy 2021-2025 Taking the lead Sustainable accelerated growth in the Amsterdam port February 2021 Table of contents 1 The port today 7 2 Trends and developments 16 3 The port in 2025 26 4 Our undertakings for the next four years 34 Annex I: Multi-year investment plan 51 Annex II: A healthy organisation 54 Annex III: Havenbedrijf Amsterdam N.V. 58 Strategy 2021-2025 Foreword The port today Trends and developments The port in 2025 Making clear choices for the next four years Annexes “In times of change, we want to offer security with a clear direction.” Foreword The Amsterdam port We are experiencing this growth during a challenging is in good shape period. Brexit, US protectionism and a more assertive We have seen significant growth in the transhipment China all seem to point to trade turning inwards. The of goods and the establishment of companies in the Netherlands and Europe are taking important steps to Amsterdam port. Our function as an international reduce greenhouse gases. While this impacts the North logistics hub and gateway to Europe remains strong. Sea Canal Area, it also offers opportunities for the 3 The new, larger sea lock at IJmuiden provides a futu- Amsterdam port. In addition, the nitrogen emission re-proof gateway to our port region via the seaports issue is leading to a decrease in issued construction of Velsen, Beverwijk, Zaanstad and Amsterdam. permits. These developments are creating uncertainty. We furthermore strengthen the vital functions for the region in our role as a metropolitan port. The impact of coronavirus By providing around 68,000 jobs and creating The coronavirus crisis has come on top of the added value of approximately 7.2 billion, the port developments outlined above.
    [Show full text]
  • *All Views Expressed in Written and Delivered Testimony Are Those of the Author Alone and Not of the U.S
    February 20, 2020 Isaac B. Kardon, Ph.D. – Assistant Professor, U.S. Naval War College, China Maritime Studies Institute* Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing: China’s Military Power Projection and U.S. National Interests Panel II: China’s Development of Expeditionary Capabilities: “Bases and Access Points” 1. Where and how is China securing bases and other access points to preposition materiel and facilitate its expeditionary capabilities? Previous testimony has addressed the various military logistics vessels and transport aircraft that supply People’s Liberation Army (PLA) forces operating abroad. This method is costly, inefficient, and provides insufficient capacity to sustain longer and more complex military activities beyond the range of mainland logistics networks. Yet, with the notable exception of the sole military “support base” (baozhang jidi, 保障基地)1 in Djibouti, these platforms are the PLA’s only organic mode of “strategic delivery” (zhanlüe tousong, 战略投送) to project military power overseas. Lacking a network of overseas bases in the short to medium term, the PLA must rely on a variety of commercial access points in order to operate beyond the first island chain. Because the PLA Navy (PLAN) is the service branch to which virtually all of these missions fall, this testimony focuses on port facilities. The PLAN depends on commercial ports to support its growing operations overseas. Over the course of deploying 34 escort task forces (ETF) since 2008 to perform an anti-piracy mission in the Gulf of Aden, the PLAN has developed a pattern of procuring commercial husbanding services for fuel and supplies at hundreds of ports across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Economische Perspectieven Voor Rotterdam the Hague Airport
    Economische perspectieven voor Rotterdam The Hague Airport Onderzoek in opdracht van de Gemeente Rotterdam Februari 2014 Erasmus University Rotterdam RHV Dr. Michiel Nijdam Dr. Alexander Otgaar 1 Inhoudsopgave Inhoudsopgave ........................................................................................................................... 2 1. Inleiding .................................................................................................................................. 3 Aanleiding .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Probleemstelling en onderzoeksvragen ............................................................................................ 3 Methode en leeswijzer ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. De economische bijdrage van de luchthaven ........................................................................ 5 Het aantal passagiers ......................................................................................................................... 5 Directe arbeidsplaatsen ..................................................................................................................... 6 Indirecte arbeidsplaatsen .................................................................................................................. 7 Afgeleide arbeidsplaatsen ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paris Resilience Strategy
    Paris Resilience Strategy FLUCTUAT NEC MERGITUR Front page : Bernard Pedretti/ Mairie de Paris Anne Hidalgo, Mayor of Paris “Fluctuat nec Mergitur”, which translates to “Beaten by the waves but not sunk”, proudly announces our motto. Made official in 1853 by the Baron Haussmann, it had been used by Parisians since the 16th century. Its origins lie in the river’s history, dating back to antiquity! Urban resilience is therefore not a new trend: it is an integral part of urban discourse. The concept was, however, somewhat forgotten at the end of the 20th century, as our societies were convinced that technical solutions would be able to overcome the risks faced by our cities. Today we are confronted with new and great challenges, which affect current and future generations. Climate change, air pollution, growing inequalities, terror threats, persistent water insecurity, the migrant crisis – all these challenges bring cities to the front line. DR/Mairie de Paris Far from inducing anxiety, urban resilience offers solutions to better prepare and adapt cities, their populations, businesses and infrastructures to these I would like to express my sincere thanks to all the challenges. It also provides opportunities to create institutional, business, academic and associated new activities and jobs while improving citizens’ partners, as well as to the municipal teams, for their quality of life. contribution to this very ambitious work, which has only just begun. I also warmly thank Michael Governance, which is our ability to organise ourselves Berkowitz and 100 Resilient Cities – Pioneered by collectively with all stakeholders and to create new the Rockefeller Foundation (100RC), who have partnerships, particularly beyond the municipality, is enlightened, guided and supported us in this key to the resilience of Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions
    GEF Familiarization HOME AGENDA LOGISTICS PRESENTATIONS PARTICIPANTS MEET THE GEF Seminar 2013 THE BASEL, ROTTERDAM AND STOCKHOLM CONVENTIONS Greater Strength in Sync Beijing, April 2010 GEF Familiarization HOME AGENDA LOGISTICS PRESENTATIONS PARTICIPANTS MEET THE GEF Seminar 2013 Landmarks of the implementation of synergies 2 28 April-10 May 22-24 Feb 2010 2013 2006 «Omnibus Establishment of decisions» at Organization of COPs AHJWG Ex-COPs and ExCOPs meetings 2008-2009 2011 «Synergies Other synergies decisions» decisions to be adopted adopted by each COP GEF Familiarization HOME AGENDA LOGISTICS PRESENTATIONS PARTICIPANTS MEET THE GEF Seminar 2013 Content of synergies decisions adopted at 2010 ExCOPs and at 2011 COPs 3 I. Joint activities II. Joint managerial functions (Proposal for the organization of the secretariats of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions) III. Joint services IV. Synchronization of the budget cycles V. Joint audits of the accounts of the secretariats VI. Decisions on review mechanisms and follow up Additional: Outcome of UNEP Executive Director’s consultative process on financing options for chemicals and wastes GEF Familiarization HOME AGENDA LOGISTICS PRESENTATIONS PARTICIPANTS MEET THE GEF Seminar 2013 2013 COPs and ExCOPs 4 • 2013 COPs and ExCOPs will be held from 28 April to 10 May 2013: • 28 April (morning): Opening and ExCOPs session • 28 April (afternoon) to 29 April: simultaneous sessions of the ordinary COPs (TA/FM, compliance, reporting, technical matters) • 30 April to 2 May: SC COP • 3 to 6 May:
    [Show full text]
  • Amsterdam Your Superyacht Destination DISCLOSURE: All Rights Reserved
    Amsterdam Your Superyacht Destination DISCLOSURE: All rights reserved. No part of the publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, by any means, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. All information is provided in good faith. Port of Amsterdam and HISWA Holland Yachting Group take no legal responsibility for the accuracy, truthfulness or reliability of the information provided. 2 Introduction Dear reader, The appeal of Amsterdam as a destination for superyachts – both in its own right and as a port of call enroute to Scandinavia and beyond – is increasingly on the radar of superyacht owners and captains. Port of Amsterdam and HISWA Holland Yachting Group are working closely together with other parties turning Amsterdam into the superyacht hub of Northern Europe and beyond. Amsterdam’s prime geographical location and friendly regulatory environment for large yachts is backed up by superb mooring spots in the heart of the city and the rich diversity of leisure opportunities on offer. The city is ideally situated as a start or ending point for the Northern European Route. Moreover, the options for refits are growing fast and there is a dense web of superyacht building yards, designers and suppliers in close proximity of the city. Amsterdam is a city of great traditions and has a rich history. One of the traditions we embrace is the hand-over of the plaque and key of the city to ships during their first call. We continue this tradition for visiting superyachts. Captains and owners are pleased to receive this warm welcome and at the same time it gives us the opportunity to explain more about Amsterdam and the Northern European Route.
    [Show full text]
  • Allard Castelein, CEO of the Port of Rotterdam Authority Speech During the APM Terminals Maasvlakte II Rotterdam Opening Ceremony, 24 April 2015
    Allard Castelein, CEO of the Port of Rotterdam Authority speech during the APM Terminals Maasvlakte II Rotterdam opening ceremony, 24 April 2015. Your Majesty, Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, It is almost six years to the day – 28 April 2009 – that we celebrated the start of construction on Maasvlakte 2, in the presence of Her Majesty Queen Beatrix. This event took place on the edge of the first Maasvlakte. We had just started the reclamation activities, and as you looked out to sea, you could just make out a tiny hump of sand, some 3 kilometres off shore. Over the past six years, many people have worked very hard to create Maasvlakte 2, and to add another 2000 ha of land to the Kingdom of the Netherlands without fighting, and to realise a world class, extremely modern container terminal at this site. An accomplishment of which we all can be exceptionally proud. In the Dutch language quite a few expressions have a maritime context. One example is ‘in zee gaan met iemand’: ‘to go to sea with someone’. We all know this means that you’ve decided to join forces; to team up; to work together. Because you share the same goal, and because you trust one another. If there’s one expression that is particularly appropriate for APM Terminals and the Port of Rotterdam, it’s that we met elkaar in zee zijn gegaan, we have gone to sea with each other. APM Terminals and the Port of Rotterdam already signed the contract for this terminal as early as June 2006: nine years ago.
    [Show full text]