Cornell University Law School Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 9-2017 Should Compensated Surrogacy Be Permitted or Prohibited? Cornell Law School. International Human Rights Policy Advocacy Clinic National Law University, Delhi Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub Part of the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Cornell Law School. International Human Rights Policy Advocacy Clinic and National Law University, Delhi, "Should Compensated Surrogacy Be Permitted or Prohibited?" (2017). Cornell Law Faculty Publications. 1551. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/1551 This Published Papers is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Should Compensated Surrogacy Be Permitted or Prohibited? Policy Report Evaluating the New York Child-Parent Security Act of 2017 that Would Permit Enforceable and Compensated Surrogacy CORNELL INTERNATIONAL HUMAN NATIONAL LAW RIGHTS: POLICY ADVOCACY CLINIC UNIVERSITY-DELHI SEPTEMBER 2017 A PROJECT OF: Table of Contents INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS: POLICY ADVOCACY CLINIC, CORNELL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL The Cornell International Human Rights: Policy METHODOLOGY 3 Advocacy Clinic works on a wide array of human GLOSSARY 4 rights projects to affect positive policy change in favor of vulnerable and marginalized groups in CHAPTER 1: THE SURROGACY PROCESS 5 societies around the world. Law students who participate in the clinic learn lawyering skills such CHAPTER 2: THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OF SURROGACY LAW IN NEW YORK 7 as interviewing, legal research, legal writing, and A. Origins of New York’s Prohibition on Surrogacy 7 developing practical solutions to complex B. Description of New York Surrogacy Law 7 problems. Under the supervision of faculty, C. Proposed Changes to New York Surrogacy Law: The Child-Parent Security Act 9 students conduct fact-finding, in the United States and abroad, and work in teams to conduct impact CHAPTER 3: NEW YORK LAW IS AN OUTLIER IN THE UNITED STATES TODAY 11 litigation or produce a policy report designed to A. Comparing New York Law To Surrogacy Laws In Other States 11 affect legislation or other policies. B. New Yorkers Are Disadvantaged because They Have to Work with Surrogates Out-of-State 15 More information about the Clinic can be found at: C. Comparing the CPSA to Surrogacy Laws in other States 15 http://kalantry.lawschool.cornell.edu/ CHAPTER 4: DECREASING RELEVANCE OF THE CONCERNS THAT LED international-human-rights-policy-advocacy- TO THE NEW YORK BAN 19 clinic/ A. Concerns Relating to New Technology Are Less Relevant 19 B. Concerns Relating to The Interests of Children Have Largely Not Been Borne TRANSNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS Out by Surrogacy Practice 19 SEMINAR, NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, C. Concerns Regarding Surrogacy’s Impact on Family Life and Relationships Are Less Relevant 20 DELHI D. Concerns Regarding Individual Liberty in Human Reproduction and Attitudes About The Transnational Human Rights Seminar focuses Reproduction Can Be Addressed Through Regulation 21 on foregrounding rights, rightlessness, and other E. Concerns Regarding Informed Consent Have Largely Not Been Borne Out vulnerabilities in understanding, critiquing, and And Can Be Addressed Through Regulation 21 reforming laws, legal institutions, and modes of governance so that they reflect constitutional CHAPTER 5: GLOBAL SURROGACY LAWS 22 ideals of justice. A. Many Countries in Western Europe Adopt a Restrictive Approach to Surrogacy Based on Religious and Moral Concerns 25 B. Lack of Regulation and Transnational Demand Led to Abuses in Several Less Developed Countries 26 C. Many Countries Permit and Regulate Surrogacy 27 D. Comparing the CPSA to Global Surrogacy Laws 30 CHAPTER 6: INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES SUPPORT LEGALIZATION OF SURROGACY 31 A. Surrogacy Does Not Contravene the Rights of Children 31 B. Permitting Surrogacy Promotes Women’s Reproductive Autonomy 31 C. Surrogacy Allows People to Found a Family 32 CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 33 AUTHORS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 34 Executive Summary arrangements. The CPSA would bring New York in protection for surrogates and children. The CPSA line with other U.S. states and would provide clear would provide sufficient regulation to mitigate Surrogacy provides a way for infertile people, as legal procedures addressing the parentage of abuses common in other countries where well as same-sex couples and single individuals, to children born through surrogacy arrangements. surrogacy is practiced without regulation. Third, become parents. Surrogacy is permitted in most some jurisdictions have moved towards a more states in the United States. In New York, however, DECREASING RELEVANCE OF permissive approach to surrogacy. Foreign surrogacy contracts are void and unenforceable CONCERNS THAT LED TO THE NEW regulatory models and regulatory models in other according to a 1992 law. The Child-Parent Security YORK BAN U.S. states show that successful surrogacy regulation is possible and provide examples Act of 2017 (the CPSA) would repeal this The current New York surrogacy law was passed for New York. prohibition, make surrogacy agreements based on recommendations of a report published enforceable, and permit surrogates to be in 1988 by the New York Task Force on Life and the compensated for the gestational care they provide. Law (the Task Force). The Task Force raised INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS In this report, we review the landscape of state concerns that surrogacy involved new and TREATIES SUPPORT LEGALIZATION OF laws in the United States, laws around the world, relatively untested technology and posed SURROGACY moral concerns that led to the adoption of the questions about baby selling and the best interests International human rights treaties and norms current New York law, and international human of children, the potential impact of surrogacy on create important standards for the United States rights considerations that are relevant to family-life and relationships, individual liberty in federal and state governments to consider when evaluating the CPSA. Based on this review, we human reproduction, attitudes about women, and regulating surrogacy. The United States is a party support the CPSA and suggest some possible challenges in ensuring informed consent. Many of to a number of important United Nations human additional protections based on practices in other the Task Force’s concerns are either no longer rights treaties. International human rights treaties jurisdictions. relevant, due to developments in the practice of and norms protect the rights of children, prohibit surrogacy and in the conception of a family, or baby selling, and protect autonomy rights such as NEW YORK LAW IS AN OUTLIER IN THE have not been borne out. The CPSA contains the right to reproductive autonomy, the right to UNITED STATES TODAY provisions that address many of the Task Force’s work, and the right to found a family. By New York is one of two states in the country that concerns that are still relevant today. prohibiting surrogacy, the current New York law refuse to enforce both compensated and restricts the reproductive autonomy of surrogates uncompensated surrogacy arrangements and GLOBAL SURROGACY LAWS and denies some parents the right to create a family. The CPSA would allow surrogacy while impose fines and criminal sanctions upon people Comparative law research supports adoption of also protecting the rights of children. involved in compensated surrogacy arrangements. the CPSA. There are three primary trends in global Most states explicitly permit or do not have any surrogacy regulation. First, many countries in laws regulating surrogacy. Consequently, New York Western Europe consistently prohibit surrogacy RECOMMENDATION couples who desire to have children through because of moral and religious concerns. People in The Child-Parent Security Act is an appropriate surrogacy enter into arrangements with surrogates those countries sometimes engage in surrogacy way to bring New York in line with the rest of the who live and will give birth outside of New York. outside of their home country, and the home United States and other successful global When New Yorkers go out-of-state this can lead to nations sometimes refuse to recognize the parental surrogacy models while also providing uncertainty over the law that applies to the standing of intended parents. Second, other appropriate protections for surrogates and arrangement and subsequently the parentage of countries including Thailand, India, Nepal, and children and complying with international human children. It also leaves New Yorkers to work with Mexico have moved from a more permissive to a rights standards and norms. We also suggest professionals who are not accountable to them in more restrictive approach to surrogacy because of additional protections and regulations that New New York, and having to conduct any litigation the generally abusive circumstances created by a York could adopt. outside of their home state. The result is more rapid proliferation in surrogacy over a short period complicated and less secure surrogacy of time and a lack of strong regulation and 1 2 Methodology surrogacy.