<<

and Chemical Toxicology 84 (2015) 161e168

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Food and Chemical Toxicology

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchemtox

Review “Aspartame: A review of genotoxicity data”

* David Kirkland a, , David Gatehouse b a Kirkland Consulting, P O Box 79, Tadcaster, LS24 0AS, United Kingdom b Old Barn, Cherry Orchard Lane, Wyddial, Near Buntingford, Herts SG9 0EN, United Kingdom article info abstract

Article history: is a methyl ester of a dipeptide of aspartic and phenylalanine. It is 200 sweeter than Received 12 June 2015 sucrose and is approved for use in food products in more than 90 countries around the world. Aspartame Received in revised form has been evaluated for genotoxic effects in microbial, cell culture and animal models, and has been 19 August 2015 subjected to a number of carcinogenicity studies. The in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity data available on Accepted 23 August 2015 aspartame are considered sufficient for a thorough evaluation. There is no evidence of induction of gene Available online 28 August 2015 mutations in a series of bacterial mutation tests. There is some evidence of induction of chromosomal damage in vitro, but this may be an indirect consequence of cytotoxicity. The weight of evidence from Keywords: Aspartame in vivo bone marrow micronucleus, chromosomal aberration and Comet assays is that aspartame is not fi Genotoxicity in vitro genotoxic in somatic cells in vivo. The results of germ cell assays are dif cult to evaluate considering Genotoxicity in vivo limited data available and deviations from standard protocols. The available data therefore support the conclusions of the European Authority (EFSA) that aspartame is non-genotoxic. © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Contents

1. Introduction ...... 162 2. In vitro studies ...... 162 2.1. Bacterial mutagenicity ...... 162 2.2. Chromosomal aberrations (CA) in mammalian cells ...... 163 2.3. In vitro micronucleus (MN) tests ...... 163 2.4. In vitro effects on DNA repair ...... 163 2.5. Other in vitro studies ...... 163 2.6. Summary of in vitro results ...... 163 3. In vivo studies in somatic cells ...... 164 3.1. Micronucleus (MN) tests in bone marrow or blood ...... 164 3.2. Chromosomal aberrations (CA) in bone marrow ...... 165 3.3. DNA damage assays ...... 165 3.4. Other in vivo studies...... 166 3.5. Summary of in vivo somatic cell data ...... 166 4. In vivo studies on germ cells ...... 167 4.1. Summary of germ cell data ...... 167 5. Conclusions ...... 167 Conflicts of interest ...... 168 Acknowledgements ...... 168

Abbreviations: CA, chromosomal aberrations; CBPI, cytokinesis-block proliferation index; EFSA, European Food Safety Authority; GLP, Good Laboratory Practice; ICH, International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; MI, mitotic index; MN, micronucleus or micronuclei; MNNCE, micronucleated normochromatic erythrocytes; MNPCE, micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes; NCE, normochromatic erythrocyte; NNG, net nuclear grains; NTP, National Toxicology Program; OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; PCE, polychromatic erythrocyte; RI, replication index; UDS, unscheduled DNA synthesis. * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Kirkland). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2015.08.021 0278-6915/© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 162 D. Kirkland, D. Gatehouse / Food and Chemical Toxicology 84 (2015) 161e168

Transparency document ...... 168 References ...... 168

1. Introduction a number of regulatory opinions (SCF, 2002; EFSA, 2006, 2009a, 2009b, 2011a, 2013). However, the genotoxicity of aspartame was Aspartame is a methyl ester of a dipeptide composed of aspartic only briefly reviewed by both Magnuson et al. (2007) and by Yilmaz acid and phenylalanine. The chemical structure is shown in Fig. 1. and Uçar (2014). The latter authors concluded that aspartame was a There are two forms of aspartame, an a and a b form, but only the a moderate genotoxic agent, whereas Magnuson et al. (2007) form is sweet. It is approximately 200 times sweeter than sucrose. concluded that extensive in vitro and in vivo studies provide It is approved for use in a wide range of food products in more than ample evidence that aspartame is not genotoxic. The purpose of 90 countries around the world and is estimated to have been added this manuscript is therefore to describe in more detail and to crit- to over 6000 different products (Butchko and Stargel, 2001). ically review all the available genotoxicity data on aspartame. Aspartame has been extensively evaluated for genotoxic effects in microbial, cell culture and animal models. It has also been subject 2. In vitro studies to a number of carcinogenicity studies. The carcinogenicity of aspartame was reviewed in detail by Magnuson et al. (2007), and A number of in vitro genotoxicity studies, including bacterial, fl more brie ybyYilmaz and Uçar (2014), and has been the subject of chromosomal aberration, micronucleus and DNA repair tests, have been performed on aspartame. The studies and their findings are summarised in Table 1. Brief additional comments on the signifi- cance of the findings are given below.

2.1. Bacterial mutagenicity

The available Ames tests with aspartame are summarised in Table 1. It can be concluded from the combined results of these four studies that aspartame is not a mutagen for bacterial cells. It is noted that none of the studies fully comply with current regulatory Fig. 1. Structure of aspartame. guidelines in that a bacterial test strain for the detection of

Table 1 Summary of in vitro genotoxicity studies with aspartame.

Test system Target cells Concs. tested Test conditions Results Reference

Bacterial mutation S. typhimurium TA1535, 10e5000 mg/plate Pre-incubation method e No toxicity; no significant Molinary (1978) (Ames) assays TA1537, TA98, TA1538, TA100 & þ S9 in 2 independent expts. increases in revertant counts S. typhimurium TA98, TA100 50e2000 mg/plate Plate incorporation e & þ S9 in No significant increases in TA98 Rencuzogullari 2 independent expts., though revertant counts; small et al. (2004) data from only 1 expt. reported increases (max. 1.4-fold, not dose-related) in TA100 revertants not considered biologically significant S. typhimurium TA1535, 100e10,000 mg/plate Pre-incubation method eS9 Negative results in TA100, NTP (2005) TA1537, TA98, TA97, TA100 and with 10% hamster liver S9; TA1535, TA1537 and TA98 30% hamster liver S9; 10% rat under all test conditions. At liver S9 and 30% rat liver S9; 2 10,000 mg/plate in TA97 (30% independent expts. rat liver S9) a 1.4-fold increase in revertants was judged equivocal. S. typhimurium TA97a, TA100 10e1000 mg/plate Plate incorporation method e No toxicity; no increases in Bandyopadhyay & þ S9, single experiment revertant counts et al. (2008) Chromosomal Human peripheral blood 500e2000 mg/mL 24 or 48 h treatment in the Statistically significant Rencuzogullari aberrations (CA) lymphocytes from 2 male & 2 absence of S9 inducing up to 34 increases in CA frequency at all et al. (2004) female donors or 56% mitotic inhibition; 3 test concentrations after both 400 cells/conc. scored for CA treatment periods Micronuclei (MN) Human peripheral blood 500e2000 mg/mL 24 or 48 h treatment in the A small (1.9e2.2-fold) but Rencuzogullari lymphocytes from 2 male & 2 absence of S9; cytochalasin B statistically significant increase et al. (2004) female donors present for the final 24 h; 8000 in MN frequency seen at binucleate cells/conc. scored for 2000 mg/mL for both treatment MN periods. Unscheduled DNA Cultured hepatocytes from 5 and 10 mM 20 h treatment; 150 cells/conc. Net nuclear grain counts all Jeffrey and synthesis (UDS) male SpragueeDawley rats. scored for autoradiographic

The small increase in MN induction and the increased fre- concentrations up to 10 mM. Since formaldehyde did induce UDS in quencies of cells with CA after the in vitro exposure of human Syrian hamster embryo cells (Hamaguchi and Tsutsui, 2000), which lymphocytes to aspartame are considered to be secondary to have considerable metabolic capability, this would suggest that the cytotoxicity and not indicative of DNA damage. However, the failure levels of formaldehyde formed from hydrolysis of aspartame are to include treatments in the presence of exogenous metabolic negligible and not genotoxic. activation merits discussion. Aspartame can be hydrolysed to pro- Although some in vitro studies did not comply with current duce four metabolites: aspartic acid, phenylalanine, methanol and a guidelines, the available data indicate that aspartame does not cyclised diketopiperazine. The latter compound is also produced as induce gene mutations in bacteria and does not induce primary a breakdown product at temperatures above 30 C. Methanol can DNA damage in mammalian cells. be further metabolised to formaldehyde, which is a DNA cross- linking agent, known to induce chromosome damage in mamma- 3. In vivo studies in somatic cells lian cells (Schmid et al., 1986). However, there is no evidence that methanol is clastogenic in vitro (see EFSA, 2013), and so its con- 3.1. Micronucleus (MN) tests in bone marrow or blood version to formaldehyde in cultured cells may not be efficient. Since the oxidising capabilities of human lymphocytes in the absence of The in vivo MN studies are summarised in Table 2. Whilst the S9 are expected to be poor, it is unlikely that the clastogenic effects acute bone marrow MN test in rats conducted by NTP (2005) was observed in human lymphocytes after exposure in vitro to high clearly negative, a positive trend was found for MNNCE in periph- concentrations of aspartame are due to the intracellular formation eral blood of female p53 haploinsufficient mice after 9 months of small amounts of formaldehyde. However, this potential has not dosing, but not in male mice or in 2 other genetically modified been evaluated in the presence of S9. On the other hand, aspartame strains of mice. The MNNCE frequency in this group was >2 that in did not induce UDS in metabolically-competent rat hepatocytes at the negative control group, however it was similar to MNNCE

Table 2 Summary of in vivo genotoxicity studies in somatic cells with aspartame.

Test system Target cells Concs. tested Test conditions Results Reference

Micronuclei Bone marrow of male F344/ 500e2000 mg/kg/ 3 daily doses; marrow sampled No clear evidence of bone marrow toxicity; NTP (2005) (MN) N rats (5 males/group) day by gavage 24 h after last dose; 2000 PCE/ no increases in MN frequency in treated rat scored for MN animals Peripheral blood of male & 3125e50,000 ppm 9 months dosing; 2000 NCE/ No significant increases in MNNCE in Tg.AC NTP (2005) female Tg.AC hemizygous, in diet mouse scored for MN hemizygous or Cdkn2a deficient mice, or in p53 haploinsufficient, and male p53 haploinsufficient mice. Small but Cdkn2a deficient mice (12 statistically significant increase and e15 mice/group) significant trend test for MNNCE at 50,000 ppm in female p53 haploinsufficient mice Bone marrow and blood of 250e1000 mg/kg Single dose; animals sacrificed MN frequencies increased significantly (>3- Kamath et al. Swiss albino mice (group by gavage 24, 48 & 72 h after dosing; 2000 fold) in the 455 mg/kg group at 24 h, but (2010) size not given) PCE/animal from bone marrow showed a dose-response at 48 and 72 h, or blood scored for MN reaching >4-fold in the 1000 mg/kg group. A similar pattern of results was seen in blood, although significant increases in MN frequency were seen in the 500 and 1000 mg/kg groups at 24 h Chromosomal Bone marrow of Holtzman 400e1600 mg/kg/ 5 daily doses; bone marrow No statistically significant increases in CA Bowles (1970) aberrations strain rats (10 males/group) day by gastric sampled approx. 29 h after the (CA) intubation last dose; 500 cells/group scored for CA Bone marrow 15 and 150 mg/kg 5 daily doses; no other detail No clastogenic response, but no details Durnev et al. (unconfirmed) of C57BL/6 by oral route established (1995) e paper mice in Russian Bone marrow of Swiss 3.5e350 mg/kg of Single dose; mice sacrificed 2-fold increase in CA in the top dose group Mukhopadhyay Albino mice (5 males/ aspartame, but 18 h after dosing; 250 cells/ but was not statistically significant and et al. (2000) group) combined with 1.5 group scored for CA probably fell within the normal range. The e150 mg/kg of overall conclusion was that the mixture of acesulfame K; oral sweeteners was not clastogenic. route Bone marrow of Swiss 250e1000 mg/kg Single dose; animals sacrificed Significant increases in CA frequencies at Kamath et al. albino mice (group size not by gavage 24, 48 & 72 h after dosing; the top 3 dose levels at 24 h and at all dose (2010) given) 100 cells/animal scored for CA levels at 48 and 72 h Bone marrow of Swiss 3.5e350 mg/kg by Single dose; animals sacrificed Some small reductions in MI seen possibly AlSuhaibani albino mice (5 males/ gavage 24 h after dosing; 250 cells/ indicating bone marrow toxicity; (2010) group) group scored for CA statistically significant increases in CA frequency at 35 mg/kg (2 control) and 350 mg/kg (2.5 control) DNA damage Glandular stomach, colon, 2000 mg/kg; oral Single dose; animals sacrificed No increases in DNA migration were seen in Sasaki et al. (alkaline liver, , urinary route 3 & 24 h after dosing; 50 nuclei/ any of the 8 tissues (2002) comet) bladder, lung, brain and organ/animal scored for comet assays bone marrow of ddY mice (tail length) (4 males/group) Bone marrow cells of Swiss 7e35 mg/kg by Single dose; animals sacrificed Small but statistically significant increases Bandyopadhyay albino mice (4 males/ gavage 18 h after dosing; 50 cells/ in % tail DNA (2.2-fold) and tail length (>10- et al. (2008) group) animals scored (% tail DNA & fold) in top dose group tail length) D. Kirkland, D. Gatehouse / Food and Chemical Toxicology 84 (2015) 161e168 165 frequencies in all male groups, and may only have achieved sta- AlSuhaibani (2010) also reported statistically significant increases tistical significance because the vehicle control MNNCE frequency in mouse bone marrow CA (summarised in Table 2). However, the in females was slightly low. Importantly, there are no historical actual frequencies in the top 2 dose groups (0.4 and 0.5% cells with CA MNNCE data for these strains. The finding of a significant increase excluding gaps) are within the normal control ranges found in other in only 1 group of females may be due to chance, and there is no studies, and since no historical control data were provided, it is not obvious reason why female mice of the p53 haploinsufficient strain known whether such increases are biologically significant. We agree should respond to a genotoxic insult when none of the other gen- with the comments of EFSA (2013), that the methods implemented ders or strains showed any response. Magnuson et al. (2007) dis- were not sufficiently robust to support the results reported, and that cussed the cleavage of aspartame in the gastrointestinal tract, and no conclusions could be drawn from the study. concluded that aspartame itself does not enter the systemic cir- Reno and Bowles (1972) tested the hydrolysis and degradation culation after oral dosing. However, tissues such as the bone product of aspartame, diketopiperazine, for induction of chromo- marrow would be exposed to the 3 cleavage products, namely somal aberrations (CA) in bone marrow of rats. Although the study aspartic acid, phenylalanine and methanol, and also to the hydro- was conducted at a contract research laboratory, it was done before lysis and degradation product diketopiperazine, after dosing via the GLPs were mandatory. Diketopiperazine was administered orally at oral route. The weight of evidence from these NTP (2005) studies 250, 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg/day for 5 days to groups of 10 male therefore indicates that the cleavage products of aspartame do not rats. The doses on each day were divided equally into three. induce MN in peripheral blood erythrocytes after both short and Although repeated dosing is not usually used for the bone marrow extended dosing periods. CA test, it is acceptable when justified e.g. where daily doses are as The bone marrow and blood MN study of Kamath et al. (2010) is high as in an acute study or where there may be accumulation of summarised in Table 2. It is interesting to note that slides were test chemical in tissues. Since the limit dose of 2000 mg/kg was stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa, which is not a DNA-specific tolerated daily for 5 days this schedule is considered acceptable. stain (acridine orange is more commonly used) and may lead to Sampling 1 day after a repeat dose schedule is acceptable. Slight artefacts (see Hayashi et al., 2000), although it is acceptable ac- weight losses (around 3% compared to control) were observed in cording to OECD (2014a). Bone marrow toxicity was supposedly the top dose group. A negative control group received the vehicle, determined by the PCE:NCE ratio, but these data were not reported; 1% Tween 80 in distilled water, and a positive control group the authors merely stated that the PCE:NCE ratio changed. The received a single intraperitoneal dose of 0.5 mg/kg triethylene- extent of bone marrow toxicity in the treated animals cannot melamine on day 5. Animals were sacrificed 24 h after the last (or therefore be determined, and, when dose levels are compared with only) dose, having been given Colcemid 5 h previously to arrest those tolerated in other studies, 3 of the 4 the dose levels used here dividing cells in metaphase. Bone marrow cells were collected from may have been cytotoxic. The pattern of MN results obtained is both femurs, swollen in hypotonic potassium chloride, smears unusual and difficult to explain. MN induced in bone marrow will made, fixed and stained with Giemsa. Fifty metaphase cells per rat not appear in the blood until many hours later, and yet the MN (i.e. 500 per group) were scored for CA. The number of cells/animal responses were higher at 24 h in blood than in bone marrow. The was lower than currently recommended but the increased group relevance of these increased MN frequencies is therefore difficult to size probably allowed acceptable statistical power and sensitivity to judge. We agree with EFSA (2013), that the methods implemented be achieved. Frequencies of cells with CA were normal in control were not sufficiently robust to support the results reported, and animals and were significantly increased by treatment with the that no conclusions could be drawn. positive control. The group treated with 250 mg/kg diketopiper- azine exhibited CA frequencies that were similar to controls. The 3.2. Chromosomal aberrations (CA) in bone marrow groups treated with 500, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg diketopiperazine all exhibited slightly higher CA frequencies, but these were less than Several bone marrow CA studies have been reported and are 2 control levels and all fell within normal ranges. They were not summarised in Table 2. In the studies of Bowles (1970) and Durnev statistically different from controls and the slight increases are not et al. (1995) aspartame did not induce any statistically significant considered to be biologically significant. No blood samples were increases in the frequencies of CA. The study of Mukhopadhyay taken to investigate systemic exposure to diketopiperazine. How- et al. (2000) on a mixture of aspartame and acesulfame K also ever, diketopiperazines are considered to have a structure that gave negative results, but the single sampling time was earlier than ensures active intestinal absorption (Cornacchia et al., 2012). recommended. These studies do lack some detail and do not follow Although the study was not conducted to GLP, and an unusual recommended study designs, so the negative results should be (repeat dose) study design was used, the study is reasonably robust viewed with caution. Although blood samples were not taken for and the negative results with diketopiperazine merit consideration. toxicokinetic analysis, systemic exposure to the cleavage products of aspartame would have been achieved, as discussed above. 3.3. DNA damage assays By contrast, Kamath et al. (2010) reported significant induction of CA in mouse bone marrow. The study was run alongside (or in The alkaline comet assay of Sasaki et al. (2002) in multiple the same animals) as the MN study discussed above, and is sum- mouse tissues is summarised in Table 2. Although suspensions of marised in Table 2. The positive results showed both time- and nuclei were investigated, rather than whole cells, and tail length dose-related trends, which is most unusual since well-known rather than tail intensity was measured, these approaches are potent genotoxins rarely produce both dose- and time-related in- acceptable under OECD guideline 489 (OECD, 2014b). No direct creases in CA. When significant CA are induced at an early sampling measures of systemic exposure were included, but, as discussed time, those cells usually die before later sampling times are above, systemic exposure to the cleavage products of aspartame reached. Also, no mitotic index data were given, and so the extent of would have occurred following oral dosing. In any case, stomach toxicity in the bone marrow is not known. Whilst the results are and colon would have been directly and heavily exposed to aspar- striking, they are difficult to evaluate. Hence, we agree with EFSA tame, and to the cleavage products formed there, in this study. (2013), that the methods implemented were not sufficiently Although no increases in DNA migration were seen in any of the 8 robust to support the results reported, and that no conclusions tissues sampled, only 50 cells/organ/animal were scored whereas could be drawn. OECD (2014b) recommends 150 cells. Thus, the negative results 166 D. Kirkland, D. Gatehouse / Food and Chemical Toxicology 84 (2015) 161e168 have to be viewed with some caution. (methylazoxymethanol) groups of 10 mice were also included. The alkaline comet assay of Bandyopadhyay et al. (2008) is Deaths that could be compound-related occurred in the top 2 summarised in Table 2. Although the dose levels of aspartame were dose groups (4 and 8 g/kg/day), reducing survival to 80 and 30% much lower than in other studies, the sampling time of 18 h was respectively. Terminal body weights of and food consumption much later than recommended (2e6 h), and, again, only 50 cells/ by surviving animals were not affected by dosing with animal were scored for comets in bone marrow cells, a significant diketopiperazine. increase in DNA migration was seen in the top dose group (35 mg/ Thirty minutes after the final dose, aliquots of nutrient broth kg), chosen as being similar to the for cultures of bacteria were injected into the peritoneum. Animals humans, namely 40 mg/kg established by the Joint FAO/WHO were sacrificed 3 h later and bacteria recovered. Viable counts Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA, 1981). However, the were determined by plating on nutrient agar, and mutant counts control tail length was short and probably enhanced the statistical were determined by plating on Spizizen's minimal agar. Based significance. No historical control values were reported, and the on the counts of bacteria recovered from the peritoneal cavity absolute increases in % tail DNA and tail length were small, so could there was no evidence that diketopiperazine inhibited the represent normal background “noise”. We agree with the comments replication of the bacteria in situ. of EFSA (2013), that the methods used were not sufficiently robust to There are no reference data against which to compare mutant support the results, and that no conclusions could be drawn. frequencies in control animals. However, mutant frequencies were significantly increased (4-fold) in the positive control 3.4. Other in vivo studies group. There were no increases in mutant frequency in any of the diketopiperazine-treated groups. Three different host-mediated assays have been performed, one on aspartame in the mouse (Bost, 1974), and 2 studies with the Diketopiperazine in rats: conversion product diketopiperazine, one in mice (Bost and Stolt, 1974) and the other in rats (Reno and Good, 1972). In the host Groups of 10 male rats were dosed by gavage with diketopi- mediated assay, animals treated with a test chemical are injected perazine at 250, 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg/day for 5 days. The intraperitoneally with one or more Ames strains (in these cases S. daily doses were divided equally into 3 aliquots given approxi- typhimurium G-46), then a few hours later the bacteria are recov- mately 2 h apart. Vehicle control and positive control (dimeth- ered from the peritoneal cavity, the bacteria are counted and the ylnitrosamine) groups of 10 rats were also included, although frequency of histidine revertants determined. A mutant frequency the positive control was only administered once on the final day. is calculated. This method allows for the test chemical to be Deaths that could be compound-related occurred in the top metabolised by the tissues of a normal animal, and for the test dose group reducing survival to 80%. Terminal body weights of chemical or any reactive metabolites to interact with the bacteria in and food consumption by surviving animals were reduced situ to produce reverse mutations. This method is no longer used in following dosing with diketopiperazine. regulatory testing as other approaches to the study of induction of Thirty minutes after the final dose, aliquots of nutrient broth gene mutations in vivo (e.g. in transgenic mice) are available. The 3 cultures of bacteria were injected into the peritoneum. Animals studies and their outcomes can be summarised as follows. were sacrificed 3 h later and bacteria recovered. Viable counts Aspartame in mice: were determined by plating on tryptone agar, and mutant counts were determined by plating on Spizizen's minimal agar. Groups of 10 male Swiss mice were dosed orally by gavage with Based on the counts of bacteria recovered from the peritoneal aspartame at 1, 2, 4 and 8 g/kg/day for 5 days. The daily doses cavity there was no evidence that diketopiperazine inhibited the were divided equally into 3 aliquots given approximately 2 h replication of the bacteria in situ. apart. Vehicle control and positive control (methylazox- There are no reference data against which to compare mutant ymethanol) groups of 10 mice were also included. Body weights frequencies in control animals. However, mutant frequencies and food consumption were not affected by dosing with aspar- were significantly increased (18-fold) in the positive control tame. Three animals died during the study, probably from group. There were no increases in mutant frequency in any of dosing errors (lung doses and oesophageal rupture). the diketopiperazine-treated groups. Thirty minutes after the final dose, aliquots of nutrient broth cultures of bacteria were injected into the peritoneum. Animals Thus, high doses of aspartame or diketopiperazine did not were sacrificed 3 h later and bacteria recovered. Viable counts induce mutations in S. typhimurium G-46 when exposed in vivo in were determined by plating on nutrient agar, and mutant counts host mediated assays in mice and rats. were determined by plating on Spizizen's minimal agar. Based AlSuhaibani (2010) also measured sister chromatid exchanges on the counts of bacteria recovered from the peritoneal cavity (SCE) in the in vivo bone marrow CA study in mice described earlier there was no evidence that aspartame inhibited the replication (see Table 2). Slight increases in SCE/cell were reported but were of the bacteria in situ. not statistically significant. This endpoint is no longer included in There are no reference data against which to compare mutant regulatory testing as the biological relevance of any findings is frequencies in control animals. However, mutant frequencies unclear. were significantly increased (30-fold) in the positive control group. There were no increases in mutant frequency in any of 3.5. Summary of in vivo somatic cell data the aspartame-treated groups. In all of the above in vivo studies, administration by the oral Diketopiperazine in mice: route was used. Following oral dosing, the GI tract (site of contact) would have been exposed to aspartame, but internal organs would Groups of 10 male Swiss mice were dosed by gavage with have been exposed to aspartic acid, phenylalanine and methanol, diketopiperazine at 1, 2, 4 and 8 g/kg/day for 5 days. The and also to the hydrolysis and degradation product diketopiper- daily doses were divided equally into 3 aliquots given approxi- azine, rather than aspartame per se. Several of the in vivo MN and mately 2 h apart. Vehicle control and positive control CA studies, and one of the comet assays, produced positive results, D. Kirkland, D. Gatehouse / Food and Chemical Toxicology 84 (2015) 161e168 167

Table 3 Summary of in vivo genotoxicity studies in germ cells with aspartame.

Test system Target cells Concs. tested Test conditions Results Reference

Chromosomal Spermatogonia of 400e1600 mg/kg/day 5 daily doses; spermatogonia No statistically significant increases in the Bowles (1970) aberrations Holtzman strain by gastric intubation sampled approx. 29 h after the frequencies of CA (CA) rats (10 males/group) last dose; 500 cells/group scored for CA Dominant Charles River CD 1000 mg/kg by 2 doses 2 h apart; each male No dominant lethal effects detected Schroeder lethal test rats (15 males/group) oral route mated with 2 females each et al. (1973) week for 8 weeks; uteri of pregnant females examined for viable implantations, late foetal death or early foetal death; ovaries removed and corpora lutea counted Sperm Sperm of Swiss 250e1000 mg/kg Single dose; animals sacrificed A dose dependent increase in % abnormal Kamath et al. morphology albino mice (group by gavage 24, 48 & 72 h after dosing; 2000 sperm was reported, and frequencies were (2010) test size not given) sperm/animal examined for significantly different from vehicle controls abnormal morphology at all doses.

but are difficult to evaluate and the conclusions are questionable. The dominant lethal test of Schroeder et al. (1973) with aspar- The positive MN finding by NTP (2005) in only female mice of 1 tame is summarised in Table 3. Although no guidelines were strain when male mice and other strains were negative suggests available at the time of the study, recommendations that were this does not represent inherent genotoxic activity. Other studies, subsequently published (Adler et al., 1994) were generally followed, including a comet assay examining site-of-contact tissues, pro- although larger numbers of males would have provided greater duced negative results, and are considered more robust. CA studies sensitivity. The study was concluded negative. Schroeder et al. in bone marrow of rats dosed daily for 5 days with high doses of (1973) also tested a conversion product of aspartame, diketopi- diketopiperazine also gave negative results. By weight of evidence, perazine, for induction of dominant lethal effects in rats using the the clastogenic and DNA-damaging potential of aspartame seen same protocol as for aspartame. Again, diketopiperazine did not in vitro has not been confirmed in vivo. The host-mediated and SCE induce any dominant lethal effects. assays with aspartame and diketopiperazine do not really A study of abnormal sperm by Kamath et al. (2010) was per- contribute to the assessment, but tend to confirm the negative gene formed alongside the MN and CA studies discussed earlier, and is mutation potential seen in vitro. Thus, sufficient data on relevant summarised in Table 3. Whilst a dose dependent increase in % endpoints in vivo have been obtained to be able to evaluate the abnormal sperm was reported, and frequencies were significantly genotoxic potential seen in vitro and, in the most reliable studies, different from vehicle controls at all doses, the earlier comments of have given negative results. It is therefore reasonable to conclude EFSA (2013) that the methods implemented were not sufficiently that aspartame is not genotoxic in somatic cells at high doses robust to support the results reported, would again indicate that no in vivo. conclusions could be drawn.

4. In vivo studies on germ cells 4.1. Summary of germ cell data

The spermatogonial CA test of Bowles (1970) is summarised in Genotoxicity data in germ cells are not usually required unless a Table 3. Dosing was over 5 days, and although repeated dosing is substance has induced genotoxic effects in somatic cells in vivo. not recommended for the spermatogonial CA test (Adler et al., Aspartame did not induce chromosomal aberrations in spermato- 1994), it is considered acceptable by OECD if justified, e.g. where gonia of rats, but the study may not be considered robust due to the daily doses are as high as in an acute study or where there may be lack of effective positive controls. Both aspartame and diketopi- accumulation of test chemical in tissues. The top daily dose was perazine failed to induce dominant lethal mutations in rats in 1600 mg/kg which is as high, or higher, than used in some of the studies that were reasonably robust but did not meet current acute studies on somatic cells. The number of cells scored/animal standards. Although increased frequencies of abnormal sperm were was lower than currently recommended but the increased group observed, the dose levels may have been cytotoxic, and the rele- size ensured that the numbers of cells scored/group achieved vance of the result is unclear. acceptable statistical power and sensitivity. The positive control, , induced a significant increase in bone 5. Conclusions marrow cells with CA, but it appears that spermatogonial cells of rats treated with triethylenemelamine were not scored. The second The in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity data available on aspartame positive control was cyclohexylamine, a sweetener that had pre- have been reviewed. The endpoints investigated in vitro and in vivo viously been reported to be genotoxic in both somatic and germ comply with the latest testing recommendations of EFSA (2011b) cells, and was expected to induce CA in spermatogonia, however it and are therefore considered sufficient for a thorough evaluation. was not confirmed to be clastogenic in this study. No blood samples There is no evidence of induction of gene mutations in a series of were taken for analysis, but systemic exposure to the cleavage bacterial mutation tests. Whilst there is some evidence of induction products of aspartame (aspartic acid, phenylalanine and methanol) of chromosomal damage in vitro, this is probably a secondary effect would have been achieved as discussed earlier and in Magnuson of cytotoxicity and not due to primary DNA damage. Furthermore, et al. (2007). Thus, although aspartame did not induce any statis- the weight of evidence from the most robust in vivo bone marrow tically significant increases in the frequencies of CA in spermato- micronucleus, chromosomal aberration and comet studies in- gonia, the lack of relevant positive control responses indicates the dicates absence of genotoxic activity for somatic tissues in animals. results should be viewed with caution. The results of germ cell assays are difficult to evaluate considering 168 D. Kirkland, D. Gatehouse / Food and Chemical Toxicology 84 (2015) 161e168 the limited data available and deviations from standard protocols. in cultured Syrian hamster embryo cells. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 83, 273e276. The data available therefore support the conclusions of EFSA (2013) Hayashi, M., MacGregor, J.T., Gatehouse, D.G., Adler, I.-D., Blakey, D.H., Dertinger, S.D., Krishna, G., Morita, T., Russo, A., Sutou, S., 2000. In vivo eryth- and of Magnuson et al. (2007) that aspartame does not show any rocyte micronucleus assay. II. Some aspects of protocol design including genotoxic potential. repeated treatments, integration with toxicity testing, and automated scoring. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 35, 234e252. ICH, 1995. Topic S2A. Genotoxicity: guidance on specific aspects of regulatory Conflicts of interest genotoxicity tests for pharmaceuticals. In: International Conference on Har- monisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Dr Kirkland and Dr Gatehouse report personal fees from Inter- Human Use. Harmonised Tripartite Guideline CPMP/ICH/141/95, Approved September 1995. national Sweeteners Association (ISA), during the conduct of the ICH, 2011. Topic S2(R1). Guidance on genotoxicity testing and data interpretation study. for pharmaceuticals intended for human use. In: International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Step 4, 9 November 2011. Acknowledgements JECFA,1981. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 52.FNP 19-JECFA 25/23. R; COMPENDIUM/ 161. http://apps.who.int/ipsc/database/evaluations/chemical.aspx?chemID¼62. Jeffrey, A.M., Williams, G.M., 2000. Lack of DNA-damaging activity of five nonnu- The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding provided by the tritive sweeteners in the rat hepatocyte/DNA repair assay. Food Chem. Toxicol. International Sweeteners Association, Avenue des Gaulois, 9, B e 38, 335e338. 1040 Brussels to review the data and prepare the manuscript. Kamath, S., Vijaynarayana, K., Shetty, D.P., Shetty, P., 2010. Evaluation of genotoxic potential of aspartame. Pharmacologyonline 1, 753e769. Magnuson, B.A., Burdock, G.A., Doull, J., Kroes, R.M., Marsh, G.M., Pariza, M.W., Transparency document Spencer, P.S., Waddell, W.J., Walker, R., Williams, G.M., 2007. Aspartame: a safety evaluation based on current use levels, regulations, and toxicological and epidemiological studies. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 37, 629e727. Transparency document related to this article can be found Molinary, S., 1978. SC-18862 (Aspartame). An Evaluation of Mutagenic Potential online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2015.08.021. Employing the Ames/Salmonella Microsome Assay. Safety Assessment Project No: 1377. Department of Product Safety Assessment. Searle Laboratories, Skokie Illinois. References Mukhopadhyay, M., Mukherjee, A., Chakrabarti, J., 2000. In vivo cytogenetic studies on blends of aspartame and acesulfame-K. Food Chem. Toxicol. 38, 75e77. Adler, I.-D., Shelby, M.D., Bootman, J., Favor, J., Generoso, W., Pacchierotti, F., NTP, 2005. NTP Report on the Toxicology Studies of Aspartame (CAS No. 22839-47- Shibuya, T., Tanaka, N., 1994. Summary report of the working group on 0) in Genetically Modified (FVB Tg.AC Hemizygous) and B6.129-Cdkn2atm1Rdp mammalian germ cell tests. Mutat. Res. 312, 313e318. (N2) Deficient Mice and Carcinogenicity Studies or Aspartame in Genetically AlSuhaibani, E.S., 2010. In vivo cytogenetic studies on aspartame. Comp. Funct. Modified [B6.129-Trp53tm1Brd (N5) Haploinsufficient] Mice (Feed Studies). Genom. pii: 605921. NTP GMM 1, NIH Publication No. 06-4459, October 2005. National Toxicology Bandyopadhyay, A., Ghoshal, S., Mukherjee, A., 2008. Genotoxicity testing of low- Program, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Available at: calorie sweeteners: aspartame, acesulfame-K, and . Drug Chem. Tox- http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/GMM_rpts/GMM1.pdf. icol. 31, 447e457. OECD, 1997. Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals: Genotoxicity. Organisation for Bost, R.G., 1974. SC-18862: an Evaluation of Mutagenic Potential Employing the Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Revised and new guidelines Host-mediated Assay in the Mouse. Pathologyetoxicology Project 1087S73. adopted 1997. Searle Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois. OECD, 2014a. Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test. OECD Guideline 474. Bost, R.G., Stolt, R.A., October 1974. SC-19192: an Evaluation of Mutagenic Potential Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Guideline Employing the Host-mediated Assay in the Mouse. Pathologyetoxicology adopted 2014. Project 1095S73. Searle Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois. OECD, 2014b. In Vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay. OECD Guideline 489. Bowles, C.A., 1970. Mutagenic Study in Rats SC-18862. Final Report. Hazelton Lab- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Guideline oratories, Inc., Falls Church, VA. Report 700e234. adopted 2014. Butchko, H.H., Stargel, W.W., 2001. Aspartame: scientific evaluation in the post- Rencuzogullari, E., Tuylu, B., Topaktas, M., Ila, H., Kayraldiz, A., Arslan, M., Dilar, S., marketing period. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 34, 221e233. 2004. Genotoxicity of aspartame. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 27, 257e268. Cornacchia, C., Cacciatore, I., Baldassarre, L., Mollica, A., Feliciani, F., Pinnen, F., 2012. Reno, F.E., Bowles, C.A., 1972. SC-19192: an Evaluation of Mutagenic Potential 2,5-diketopiperazines as neuroprotective agents. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 12, Employing the in Vivo Cytogenetics Method in the Rat. Final Report. Hazelton 2e12. Laboratories, Inc, Vienna, VA. Report 700e267. Durnev, A.D., Oreshchenko, A.V., Kulakova, A.V., Beresten, N.F., Seredenin, S.B., 1995. Reno, F.E., Good, R.C., 1972. SC-19192: an Evaluation of Mutagenic Potential Study into the clastogenic activity of dietary substitutes. Vopr. Med. Employing the Host-mediated Assay in the Rat. Final Report. Hazelton Labo- Khimii 41, 31e33 (in Russian). ratories, Inc, Vienna, VA. Report 700e269. EFSA, 2006. Opinion of the scientific panel on food additives, flavourings, pro- Ruddel, W., Bone, T., Hill, M., Blendis, L., Waters, C., 1976. Gastric juice nitrite: risk cessing aids and materials in contact with food (AFC) on a request from the factor for cancer in the hypochlorhydric stomach. Lancet ii (7994), 1037e1039. Commission related to a new long-term carcinogenicity study on aspartame. Sargentini, N., Smith, K., 1986. Mutagenesis by normal metabolites in E.coli: Question number EFSA-Q-2005-122. EFSA J. 356, 1e44. phenylalanine mutagenesis is dependent on error-prone DNA repair. Mutat. EFSA, 2009a. Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the Res. 161, 113e118. 2nd ERF carcinogenicity study on aspartame. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Sasaki, Y.-F., Kawaguchi, S., Kamaya, A., Ohshita, M., Kabasawa, K., Iwama, K., Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (EFSA-Q-2008-746). EFSA J. Taniguchi, K., Tsuda, S., 2002. The comet assay with 8 mouse organs: results 945, 1e18. with 39 currently used food additives. Mutat. Res. 519, 103e119. EFSA, 2009b. Updated opinion on a request from the European Commission related SCF, 2002. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food: Update on the Safety of to the 2nd ERF carcinogenicity study on aspartame, taking into consideration Aspartame. SCF/CS/ADD/EDUL/222 Final, 10 December 2002. € study data submitted by the Ramazzini Foundation in February 2009. Opinion Schlag, P., Bockler, R., Ulrich, H., Peter, M., Merkle, P., Herfarth, C., 1980. Are nitrite of the Scientific Committee/Scientific Panel e published: 20 April 2009. Sci- and N-nitroso-compounds in gastric juice risk factors for carcinoma in the entific opinion of the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to operated stomach? Lancet i (8e71), 727e729. Food (EFSA-Q-2009-00474). EFSA J. 1015, 1e18. Schmid, E., Goggelmann, W., Bauchinger, M., 1986. Formaldehyde induced cytotoxic, EFSA, 2011a. Statement of EFSA on the scientific evaluation of two studies related to genototoxic and mutagenic response in human lymphocytes and Salmonella the safety of artificial sweeteners. EFSA J. 9 (2), 2089. typhimurium. Mutagenesis 1, 427e431. EFSA, 2011b. Scientific opinion on genotoxicity testing strategies applicable to food Schroeder, R.E., Mitchell, A., Rao, K.S., McConnell, R.G., Sammeta, K., 1973. SC-18862: and feed safety assessment. EFSA J. 9 (9), 2379. an Evaluation of the Mutagenic Potential in the Rat Employing the Dominant EFSA, 2013. Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of aspartame (E 951) as a food Lethal Assay. Pathology-toxicology Project No. 868H70 (1973). Department of additive. EFSA J. 11 (12), 3496. Biological Research (Pathology-Toxicology), Searle Laboratories, Chicago. Gatehouse, D., Haworth, S., Cebula, T., Gocke, E., Kier, L., Matsushima, T., Melcion, C., Shephard, S., Meier, I., Lutz, W., 1991. Alkylating potency of nitrosated amino- Nohmi, T., Ohta, T., Venitt, S., Zeiger, E., 1994. Recommendations for the per- and peptides. In: O'Neil, I., Chen, J., Bartsch, H. (Eds.), Relevance to Human formance of bacterial mutation assays. Mutat. Res. 312, 217e233. cancer of N-nitroso Compounds, Tobacco Smoke and , vol. 105. IARC Gebara, J., Querol, C., Gebara, M., Castro-Prado, M., 2003. Mitotic segregation Scientific Publications, France, pp. 383e397. induced by edulcorant 1-apartyl-1-phenylalanine-methyl-ester 9aspartame) in Shephard, S., Wakabayashi, K., Nagao, M., 1993. Mutagenic activity of peptides and diploid cells of Aspergillus nidulans. Biol. Sci. 25, 203e206. the artificial sweetener aspartame after nitrosation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 31, Hamaguchi, F., Tsutsui, T., 2000. Assessment of genotoxicity of dental antiseptics: 323e329. ability of phenol, guaiacol, p-phenolsulfonic acid, sodium hypochlorite, p- Yilmaz, S., Uçar, A., 2014. A review of the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of chlorophenol, m-cresol or formaldehyde to induce unscheduled DNA synthesis aspartame: does it safe or not? Cytotechnology 66, 875e881.