United States Court Directory
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The David and Barbara Pryor Center for Arkansas Oral and Visual History
The David and Barbara Pryor Center for Arkansas Oral and Visual History University of Arkansas 1 East Center Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-6829 Arkansas Memories Project Ray Thornton Interviewed by Scott Lunsford September 20, 2011 Little Rock, Arkansas Copyright 2014 Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas. All rights reserved. Objective Oral history is a collection of an individual's memories and opinions. As such, it is subject to the innate fallibility of memory and is susceptible to inaccuracy. All researchers using these interviews should be aware of this reality and are encouraged to seek corroborating documentation when using any oral history interview. The Pryor Center's objective is to collect audio and video recordings of interviews along with scanned images of family photographs and documents. These donated materials are carefully preserved, catalogued, and deposited in the Special Collections Department, University of Arkansas Libraries, Fayetteville. The transcripts, audio files, video highlight clips, and photographs are made available on the Pryor Center website at http://pryorcenter.uark.edu. The Pryor Center recommends that researchers utilize the audio recordings and highlight clips, in addition to the transcripts, to enhance their connection with the interviewee. Transcript Methodology The Pryor Center recognizes that we cannot reproduce the spoken word in a written document; however, we strive to produce a transcript that represents the characteristics and unique qualities of the interviewee's speech pattern, style of speech, regional dialect, and personality. For the first twenty minutes of the interview, we attempt to transcribe verbatim all words and utterances that are spoken, such as uhs and ahs, false starts, and repetitions. -
Federal Erosion of Business Civil Liberties
“What is astonishing is that the attorney-client privilege, one of the foundational rights on which rests Anglo-American legal culture . should now be under siege. The two federal agencies that have been most SPECIAL REPORT: vigorous in seeking waiver of the attorney-client privilege have been the Department of Federal Erosion Justice and — unfortunately, I of Business must say — the Securities and Exchange Commission.” Civil Liberties Paul S. Atkins SEC Commissioner January 18, 2008 WLF Washington Legal Foundation “The message should be clear Advocate for freedom and justice© 2009 Massachusetts Avenue, NW that prosecutions will go as high Washington, DC 20036 up the corporate hierarchy as www.wlf.org the evidence permits and we will hold senior managers of corporations accountable, as well as the corporation itself.” Granta Y. Nakayama EPA Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance June 12, 2006 SPECIAL REPORT: Federal Erosion of Business Civil Liberties This Report, along with WLF’s Timeline: Federal Erosion of Business Civil Liberties, is a part of our ongoing CRIMINALIZATION OF FREE ENTERPRISE—BUSINESS CIVIL LIBERTIES PROGRAM. For more information on this program or to receive additional copies of this Report or the Timeline, please contact WLF at (202) 588-0302 or visit us online at www.wlf.org. Copyright © 2008 Washington Legal Foundation Table of Contents Introduction: The Honorable Dick Thornburgh .........................ii Chapter One: Mens Rea, Public Welfare Offenses, and the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine ............................ 1-1 Chapter Two: Environmental Protection Agency Criminal Enforcement Policies ............................................. 2-1 Chapter Three: Department of Justice Criminal Prosecution Policies ....... 3-1 Chapter Four: Parallel Civil and Criminal Prosecutions ................ -
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY NOMINEE FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GENERAL (PUBLIC) 1. Name: Full name (include any former names used). Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr. 2. Position: State the position for which you have been nominated. Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States 3. Address: List current office address. If state of residence differs from your place of employment, please list the state where you currently reside. Frank R. Lautenberg United States Courthouse & Post Office Building 50 Walnut Street Newark, NJ 07101 4. Birthplace: State date and place of birth. April 1, 1950. Trenton, New Jersey 5. Marital Status: List spouse’s name, occupation, employer’s name and business address(es). Please also indicate the number of dependent children. Martha-Ann (Bomgardner) Alito. Librarian, substitute teacher, Caldwell-West Caldwell Board of Education, Harrison Building, 104 Gray Street, West Caldwell, NJ 07006. Two dependent children. 6. Education: List in reverse chronological order any college, law school, and other institutions of higher education attended. Please include dates of attendance, whether a degree was received, and the date each degree was received. 1972-1975: Yale Law School, J.D. June 1975 1968-1972: Princeton University, A.B. June 1972 7. Employment Record: List in reverse chronological order, all governmental agencies, business or professional corporations, companies, firms, or other enterprises, partnerships, institutions and organizations, non-profit or otherwise, with which you have been affiliated as an officer, director, partner, proprietor, elected official or employee since graduation from college, and if you received payment for your services. -
West Slates Summit Talk Dec, 19 in Paip
Far Ai SUmlyUU 14014 VOLUME LXXX1I NO. 55 RED BANK, N. J., MONDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1959 7c PER COPY Quiz Ace West Slates Summit Talk Dec, 19 in Paip Allies to Map VanDoren Will MiddletownResident Be A§ked the Dies in PlaneWAYNESBORO Crash, Va.-William With KkruA Big Question McQueen. 34, of 9 Lawrence Cunt, Radios Stolen ir., New Monmouth, N. J., was WASHlNGKl^fM^ & WASHINGTON (AP)-Charles From Local Store imong the 26 persons who lost President Ei«nlio#aT «d Van Doren, an old hand at ques- their lives Friday night when a the heads of Brli tions and answers, comei up to- A samber of guns aad some Piedmont Airlines DC-3 crashed day with hia long-awaited answer traasiter radios were stolen on a mountainside 18 miles west and West Gerriuny to mother:^ ; from Scan Roebuck and Co., of here. meet in Paris Dec 19 to Did he get secret- behind-the- M White St., seme time over scenes help' when he won $129,000 work out « Mild WMtWB the week-end, police said thi* on the TV quiz show 'Twenty- stand for talks with Kit* morning. One?" ; . sia. A congressional 'source who Police said eatry wu pined IATONTOWM HLlUr*—First aid squad/nan aid throe i njured persons in a four-car accident on Monmouth Park Agreement oa fJM data md talked with Van Doren the oth- through a second floor rear Hwy., Eatontown, Saturday night. The injured were taken to Monmouth Medical Center for treatment. place of the meeting wu sa> er day said his answer will be window. -
Jjjlvjc QUADRANGLE ! NOTES
---m THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL VOLUME 35, NUMBER 4 JJjlVJc QUADRANGLE ! NOTES : Law School Campaign 1992 - 1997 DEVELOPMENT AND ALUMNI RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT Cover is a rendition of the Law School Campaign poster (photograph by Batthazar Korab). To obtain a commemorative poster (14 x 24) please contact die University of Michipn Law School, Development and Alumni Relations, 721 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-307 1,3 13/998-6132. The University of Michigan $75 Million Law School Campaign 19921997 2 The Lazt~School Campnign The Law School Campaign n the weekend of September 17-19, The Law School is proud to an- THE CAMPAIGN GOALS 01992, the Law School celebrated nounce this Campaign in which all the public announcement of the $75 alumni, faculty, and friends are invited to Enhum' Faculty Support.. $1 5 M~lliun million Law School Campaign. The Law participate. The leadership gifts featured Erdcwvd Studrnr Support ................... .. $15 Million School Campaign constitutes part of the in the pages that follow illustrate the University of Michigan's $1 billion extraordinary generosity of Law School Endowed Progmm Suppm t . $15 M111lon Campaign for Michigan, the largest fund- graduates and friends who have contrib- raising effort ever undertaken by a public uted to the Campaign's two-year advance Lnw School F~cndUnresmct~.d G~ia . $15 blilLoti university. Nucleus Fund effort. In addition to hkw Beqtcest Comm~mena. $15 Million The Law Quadrangle, resplendent responding to reunion, bequest, and with a large blue and white tent, was the other special giving programs, all setting for the reception and announce- graduates have the opportunity to ment dinner on Thursday evening, support the Campaign through their September 17. -
Soft on Corporate Crime
September 26, 2019 www.citizen.org Soft on Corporate Crime DOJ Refuses to Prosecute Corporate Lawbreakers, Fails to Deter Repeat Offenders Acknowledgments Rick Claypool, research director for Public Citizen’s President’s Office, is the author of this report. Alan Zibel, research director for Public Citizen’s Corporate Presidency Project, and Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, edited the report. Professor Brandon Garrett and Jonathan Ashley provided valuable insight and feedback on the report and assistance with the Duke University/University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry, a comprehensive database of corporate criminal enforcement data they maintain. Former Public Citizen researcher Elizabeth Ben-Ishai authored an early version of the report. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a national nonprofit organization with more than 500,000 members and supporters. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, administrative advocacy, research and public education on a broad range of issues including consumer rights in the marketplace, product safety, financial regulation, worker safety, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform and government ethics, fair trade, climate change, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen 1600 20th St. NW Washington, D.C. 20009 P: 202-588-1000 http://www.citizen.org © 2019 Public Citizen. Public Citizen Soft on Corporate Crime Contents Introduction: Corporate Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements Explained ....................................... -
History of the U.S. Attorneys
Bicentennial Celebration of the United States Attorneys 1789 - 1989 "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor– indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." QUOTED FROM STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND, BERGER V. UNITED STATES, 295 U. S. 88 (1935) Note: The information in this document was compiled from historical records maintained by the Offices of the United States Attorneys and by the Department of Justice. Every effort has been made to prepare accurate information. In some instances, this document mentions officials without the “United States Attorney” title, who nevertheless served under federal appointment to enforce the laws of the United States in federal territories prior to statehood and the creation of a federal judicial district. INTRODUCTION In this, the Bicentennial Year of the United States Constitution, the people of America find cause to celebrate the principles formulated at the inception of the nation Alexis de Tocqueville called, “The Great Experiment.” The experiment has worked, and the survival of the Constitution is proof of that. -
The Strange Career of Birdie Mae Davis: a History of a School
THE STRANGE CAREER OF BIRDIE MAE DAVIS: A HISTORY OF A SCHOOL DESEGREGATION LAWSUIT IN MOBILE, ALABAMA, 1963 - 1997 Except where reference is made to the work of others, the work described in this thesis is my own or was done in collaboration with my advisory committee. This thesis does not include propriety or classified information _____________________________ Brian Andrew Duke Certificate of Approval: _______________________ ________________________ David Carter Jennifer Brooks, Chair Associate Professor Associate Professor History History _______________________ ________________________ Larry Gerber George T. Flowers Professor Emeritus Dean History Graduate School THE STRANGE CAREER OF BIRDIE MAE DAVIS: A HISTORY OF A SCHOOL DESEGREGATION LAWSUIT IN MOBILE, ALABAMA, 1963 - 1997 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts Auburn, Alabama May 9, 2009 THE STRANGE CAREER OF BIRDIE MAE DAVIS: A HISTORY OF A SCHOOL DESEGREGATION LAWSUIT IN MOBILE, ALABAMA, 1963 - 1997 Brian Andrew Duke Permission is granted to Auburn University to make copies of this thesis at its discretion, upon request of individuals or institutions and at their expense. The author reserves all publication rights. ____________________________ Signature of Author ____________________________ Date of Graduation iii VITA Brian Andrew Duke, son of Andrew and Lynne (Rhodes) Duke was born 12 August 1983. From 1990 – 2002, he attended Mobile County Public Schools and graduated from Murphy High School in 2002. He attended Spring Hill College in Mobile, Alabama and graduated magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts degree in History in May 2006. He entered Graduate School, Auburn University, in August 2006. -
Introducing Alabama Family Law (Alabama Practice Series) by Judith S
NOVEMBER 2008 • VOL. 69, NO. 6 Ten Tips to ImproveImprove Your Case on Appeal page 443443 One malpractice insurer is still here and continues to maintain stable premium rates! AIM: For the Difference! Attorneys Insurance Mutual Telephone (205) 980-0009 of Alabama, Inc. Toll Free (800) 526-1246 200 Inverness Parkway FAX (205) 980-9009 Birmingham , Alabama 35242-4813 "A Mutual InsuranceCompany Organized by and for AlabamaAttorneys" www.AttyslnsMut.com - Association Sponsored Individual Health Insurance featuring Discounted Rates from WORLD ® I INSURANCE and Enhanced Benefits from 1\Aetna" Through im) ISI ALABAMA - INsi/i!NtE SPECIALISTS, INC . EST.1959 Health Plan Administrator 1-888-ISI- l 959 www.isi1959.com - Click on Health Insurance Center 49 Years and Counting! Alabama Bar Institute for Continuing Legal Education ABICLE will celebrate 50 years of service in 2009. Founded in 1959 by The University of Alabama School of Law and the Winter Calendar 2008 Alabama State Bar, ABICLE has been providing quality professional education to NOVEMBE:R 6 Professionalism Montgomery Alabama lawyers ever since. 7 Social Security Disability Birmingham Thank you for making us a 14 Bankruptcy Law Update Birmingham part of your practice! 20 Alabama Update Mobile 21 Alabama Update Montgomery 21 Employment Law Birmingham DECEMBER 5 Estate Planning Birmingham 5 Trial Skills Montgomery 9 Alabama Update Huntsville 10 Trial Skills Huntsville 111 Domestic Practice Birmingham 12 Condominium Law Birmingham 12 Tort Law Update Birmingham 17 Law Practice and Depositions: Tips From the Maste:rs Birmingham 17 Video Replays Tuscaloosa 18 Trial Skills Birmingham 19 Alabama Update Birmingham McElroy's Alabama Evidence 2007/2008 Supplement iis now available at ABICLE Order now at (800) 627-6514 (800) 627-65 4 T HE UNIVERSITY OF www.abide.org ALABAMA SCHOOL OF LAW On the NOVEMBER 2008 • VOL. -
Attorney General's Task Force on Violent Crime
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ·-"t-·~\ ,0 li 1f' 1.;. National Criminal Justice Reference Service (",.~ ,.-_ >_J \ ~ncJ,rs-----i:il'~'~ u.s. Department of Justice t 1 : j !. :I .J j This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base, Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary, The resolution chart on Attorney General's this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality, Task Force on Violent Crime 2 5 :; 111112.8 . 11111 . 1.0 3 2 I~ Illil . I . \ W < ,0 w n~~ ~ Final Report :i I~ ... ~ 1.1 1.i.IL:.~ I August 17, 1981 , ) 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 i I' MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A ~l , r~' "~ ~.,. , .. ',",' '~, Microfilming' proc~d~~e~ used to create this fiche comply with . the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author(s) and do not represent the official , I .DATE FILMED! position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. ~. ". ~':I.....:-.~:y~:-:"" ""'-...c~-~ '."" ___""" b'""' "~' . (;F J~... .' . .. .. -.:-- ! TNati~nal i~stitut~-orJustice .. .. :lA.:· ~ . 12/01/811 .' t··· .. -, ,. .. ,. ,. ---.. -.-.~. --'-'--~ .~.~ ....~.. I , i l}nited States Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20531 g L ..... .. i 1 I I , i~' " J ..... 1·.. " .~_)... ... r / / .. ' ...... r U.S. Department of Justice : Attorney General's Task Force on Violent Crime Final Report Task Force Members: GRIFFIN B. -
Exclusionary Rule (1 of 2) Box: 6
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Barr, William: Files Folder Title: Exclusionary Rule (1 of 2) Box: 6 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ ,;:- WHITE HOUSE LAW LIBRARY ROOM 528 OEOB (2021 395-3391/ ·/ D 57 To @J1 dd:J Room~/~ From~ ( e_, flJ(l:si: t-T eep ___ To Borrow (Date Due _____, ___ Per Your Request/Per Our Conversation ditor's note: Over th e years, critics of the These justices were engaged in a less c/11sio11ary rule have called it, among other ambitious venture, albeit a most important ings, an "illogical," "-irrational," and "un one. They were interpreting the Fourth atural" interpretation of the Fourth and Amendment as b est they could. As they saw 011rtee11th Amendments. it, the rule-now known as the federal exclu Last fall, for example, U.S. Court of Ap sionary rule-rested on "a principled basis 5 als Judge Malcolm Wilkey, writing in the rather than an empirical proposition." all Street Journal, said the rule "is not The dissenters in United States v. Caland required by the Constitution . ... The exclu- ra were, I think, plainly right when they ionary rule is a judge-made rule of evidence maintained that "uppermost in the minds of hich bars 'the use of evidence secured the framers of the [exclusionary] mle" was rough an illegal search and seiz ure.' .. -
Purposefully Restructuring the Law School Curriculum Malcolm Richard Wilkey
BYU Law Review Volume 1981 | Issue 1 Article 15 3-1-1981 What Role for the Law School in American Legal Education? Purposefully Restructuring the Law School Curriculum Malcolm Richard Wilkey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Malcolm Richard Wilkey, What Role for the Law School in American Legal Education? Purposefully Restructuring the Law School Curriculum, 1981 BYU L. Rev. 1 (1981). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol1981/iss1/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What Role for the Law School in American Legal Education? Purposefully Restructuring the Law School Curriculum Malcolm Richard Wilkey* I. INTRODUCTION:HOWWE GOT WHEREWE ARE .... 11. THE OBJECTIVEOF LEGALEDUCATION: PRODUCING COMPETENTLAWYERS ........................... A. Delivery of Competent Legal Services. ...... B. Fields of Competence. ..................... C. Skills Essential to the Competent Practicing Lawyer ................................... 111. THELOCUS OF LEGALEDUCATION: WHERE LAWYERS SHOULDDEVELOP THESE SKILLS. ................. A. Skills Best Acquired Outside a Legal Setting B. Skills Best Acquired Within a Substantive Legal Setting ............................. C. The English Alternative: Responsibility for Legal Training Borne by the Legal Profession IV. THEPROPER ROLE OF THE LAWSCHOOL IN THE CON- TINUUM OF AMERICANLEGAL EDUCATION .......... A. Present Defects ........................... B. Two Remedies ............................ 1. A Radical Solution: Two Tiers of Legal Education ............................. 2. A Moderate Solution: Restructuring the Third Year.