Zenopsis Spp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zenopsis Spp 1 ICES CM 2002/M:28 Theme Session on Oceanography and Ecology of Seamounts Indications of Unique Ecosystems The role of Zenopsis spp. as a predator in seamount and shelf habitats Heike Zidowitz, Heino O. Fock, Hein v. Westernhagen Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, PO Box 12 01 61, D- 27515 Bremerhaven, Germany [tel + 49 471 4831 1382, fax +49 471 4831 1425, email: initial first [email protected]] Abstract The genus Zenopsis Gill 1862 consists of three species. Zenopsis conchifer occurs in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans whereas Zenopsis nebulosus has a wide distribution in the (Indo-) Pacific Ocean. Zenopsis oblongus, described in 1989, is closely related to Z. nebulosus and only known from the Nazca Ridge in the SE Pacific. Feeding studies are reviewed for all three species. At the Great Meteor Seamount (GMR) (NE Atlantic), Z. conchifer shows a shift in prey selectivity with ontogenetic development. Smaller specimens (<46 cm TL) preyed on constituents of the sound scattering layer (SSL) (myctophids, stomiids). Diet of larger specimens (>52 cm) predominantly consisted of bentho-pelagic Macroramphosus spp., which was the most abundant fish species on that seamount. A similar ontogenetic shift was observed for Z. conchifer on the Namibian shelf. However, prey for the larger specimens consisted mainly of the pelagic species Trachurus trachurus and Synagrops microlepis. In the Pacific, Z. nebulosus (oblongus) obtains a similar trophic position with regard to migrating components of the SSL. However, though being also very abundant at the Nazca-Ridge seamounts, no Macroramphosus spp. were eaten. Large specimens of Z. nebulosus were found to prey on bentho-pelagic rockfishes (Sebastidae). Zenopsis spp. appears to be an off- bottom pelagic predator with preference for mesopelagic food components in all areas considered. It is suggested that larger specimens abandon the off-bottom pelagic feeding mode and that body size thus determines the capabilities of Zenopsis spp. to prey on bentho- pelagic species. 2 Keywords: Zenopsis conchifer, Zenopsis nebulosus, Zenopsis oblongus, feeding ecology, sound scattering layer, Abbreviations: GMR – Great Meteor Seamount (follow Wilson and Kaufmann 1987), SSL – sound scattering layer Introduction: The genus Zenopsis spp. Gill 1862 consists of three species, Zenopsis conchifer, Zenopsis nebulosus and Zenopsis oblongus. These species are very similar in body plan with laterally flattened bodies with an upwardly pointing face and a silvery coloration (Swaby & Potts 1999). Z. conchifer occurs in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans (fig.1). In the eastern Atlantic it inhabits shelf areas from Ireland to South Africa, most abundant at 20° N (north-west Africa) (Maurin & Quéro 1982). The distribution in north-western European areas expanded since the 1960ies reaching Ireland in the 1980ies (Swaby & Potts 1999). Besides the shelf habitats it is also found around Islands (Canary islands) and on seamounts far off the continental rises e.g. at the Great Meteor Seamount (GMR). In the western part of the Atlantic its distribution ranges from Nova Scotia to North Carolina (Scott & Scott 1988) where it gets more abundant. It is also known from Brazil (Haimovici et al. 1994) to Argentina (Quigley & Flannery 1995). In the Indian Ocean Z. conchifer is found off the SW coast of India and off southern Africa from Walvis Bay to Kenya (Smith & Heemstra 1986) up to Somalia and in Indonesia (Froese & Pauly. Eds. 2002. FishBase). Z. conchifer reaches a total length of 80 cm (Smith & Heemstra 1986) and a body weight up to 3.2 kg (Robins & Ray 1986). Specimens of ca. 60 cm are estimated to be 12-14 years old (this paper), larger specimens probably get older than 20 years. Z. nebulosus is known in the Indo-Pacific region, from Japan, Northwest shelf of Australia to Broken Bay in New South Wales, New Zealand (Kailola et al. 1993), and elsewhere in the region (Philippines (Anon 2001)) (fig.2). In the Eastern Pacific it is known off central and southern California, USA (Eschmeyer et al. 1983) and from several seamounts in the western Pacific (e.g. Hancock Seamount, Kammu Seamount (Hawaiian Ridge); Jumeau Seamount (Richer de Forges 2000), Stylaster Seamount (Norfolk Ridge) (Froese & Pauly. Eds. 2002. FishBase) Specimens caught at seamounts of the Nazca Ridge (SE Pacific) have been 3 investigated by Parin et al. 1988. An analysis of otolith increments revealed an age of 13 years at a standard length of 46 cm. Different from Z. chonchifer, Z. nebulosus reaches only a size up to 70 cm in total length and a maximum weight of 3.0 kg (Williams 1990), so that it can be estimated that the species reaches an age of more than 20 years. These investigations on the ecology of Z. nebulosus of the Nazca Ridge (Parin et al. 1988) are more likely to refer to Z. oblongus. Z. oblongus was first described in 1989 and is very closely related to Z. nebulosus, but differs by a lower body and larger number of osseous scutella above the anal fin (Parin 1989). It is only known from the Nazca Ridge in the Eastern Pacific Ocean as a probable endemic species of the area (Parin et al. 1997) (fig.3). Z. conchifer was caught in depths ranging from 50 – 730 m (Saldanha 1968) but mainly occurs on the upper slope at 200 – 400 m (Quigley & Flannery 1995, Quéro 1998). It is frequently encountered in coastal waters (Quéro et al. 1990) and found in midwater or near the bottom (Swaby & Potts 1999) and it is probable that it occurs in schools (Berry 1978, Whitehead et al. 1986). Z. conchifer is regarded as a bentho-pelagic species of the deep-water (Froese & Pauly. Eds. 2002. FishBase), a mesopelagic species (Scott & Scott 1988) or bathypelagic species (Quéro & Pariente 1977). Z. nebulosus is considered as a bathydemersal deep-water species with occurrences in depths ranging from 30 - 800 m (Froese & Pauly. Eds. 2002. FishBase). Parin et al. (1997) consider Z. oblongus as a bentho-pelagic species in a wide sense inhabiting depths between 180 – 330 m. They also indicate the species as an off-bottom pelagic species, which can swim far away from the bottom, rising in midwater during diel vertical migrations. Compared to fisheries of shelf areas, deepwater fisheries show a shift in families of fishes which are commercially exploited. On the continental shelves primary families of exploited fishes are Gadidae, clupeoids, salmonids, scombrids and Pleuronectidae whereas deepwater fisheries are based on entirely different orders, such as Beryciformes, Zeiformes and Scorpaeniformes (Koslow et al. 2000). Differences at this taxonomic level indicate fundamental shifts in body plan and ecological strategy as well as in evolutionary lineage (Koslow et al. 2000). Many deepwater species aggregate on seamounts and form a distinct guild based on common features of their body plan, proximate composition, physiology and metabolism, ecology and life history (Koslow 1996, 1997). They tend to be robust and deep- 4 bodied in order to manoeuvre in the strong currents characteristic of this environment (Koslow et al. 2000). These fishes generally do not migrate vertically, but depend on the influx of meso- and bathypelagic organisms past the seamount and on intercepting mesopelagic migrators on their downward migration (Isaac and Schwartzlose, 1965; Genin et al. 1988; Koslow 1997). Some predators developed an expectant hunting strategy along plateau margins and an increased habitat dependent resource utilisation rate at locations of sound scattering layer interception (Fock et al. 2002). To explain living conditions for seamount populations in often impoverished nutritional conditions in the ambient oceanic regions, the sound scattering layer-interception hypothesis (Isaacs and Schwartzlose 1965) has been developed. It implies a primarily pelagic food utilisation for bentho-pelagic fishes, increased habitat dependent utilisation rates at locations of interception with the sound scattering layer, diel changes in utilisation rates due to availability of prey and sufficient resource partitioning among species in order to avoid competitive exclusion (Fock et al. 2002b). It was suggested that it represents a large enough prey source to maintain populations at seamounts (Hesthagen 1970, Rogers 1994, Parin et al. 1997). A very important reason for the success of the deepwater families is the far K-selected end of the life-history spectrum (Koslow et al. 2000). It is characterised by longevity, slow growth and delayed maturity. With these features the species fill a gap in the distribution of teleost life-history patterns (Roff 1984). Because in deepwater habitats the recruitment appears to be episodic and e.g. orange roughy and Sebastes spp. undergo extended periods (decade or more) of very low recruitment to the adult population (Leaman and Beamish 1984), Murphy 1968 and Stearns 1976 hypothesised an evolutionary link between longevity and recruitment. The adaptations on the life-history level could constitute the population’s ability to withstand extended periods of poor recruitment (Koslow et al. 2000). Episodic recruitment can also be assumed for commercially not exploited genera like Zenopsis, Antigonia, Capros. Morids (Moridae), cusk-eels (Brotulidae) and hakes (Merlucciidae) are robust-bodied Gadiformes and active predators (Koslow et al. 2000). Hakes form a small but widely distributed family (Koslow et al. 2000). Species of Merluccius are voracious predators inhabiting the continental shelf and upper slope (Froese & Pauly. Eds. 2002. FishBase) and are often dominant piscivores over upper portions of the continental slope and typically migrate vertically into the upper waters at night to feed (Bulman and Blaber 1986). Their 5 productivity is thereby linked directly to the near-surface food web (Koslow et al. 2000) which makes them less adjusted to seamount habitats. Fock et al. (2002) showed that the Gadiformes contributed an extremely low share to overall catch at the Great Meteor seamount although they dominate on the shallower shelf of the NE Atlantic. Materials and methods Sampling Sampling was carried out at GMR during R/V Meteor cruise M 42/3 in September 1998.
Recommended publications
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Order ZEIFORMES PARAZENIDAE Parazens P.C
    click for previous page Zeiformes: Parazenidae 1203 Order ZEIFORMES PARAZENIDAE Parazens P.C. Heemstra, South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, South Africa iagnostic characters: Small to moderate-sized (to 30 cm) oblong fishes, the head and body com- Dpressed; body depth slightly less than head length, contained 2.6 to 2.9 times in standard length; head naked, the bones thin and soft; opercular bones weakly serrate; mouth large, terminal, the upper jaw extremely protrusile; maxilla widely expanded posteriorly, and mostly exposed when mouth is closed; no supramaxilla; jaws with 1 or 2 rows of small, slender, conical teeth; vomer with a few short stout teeth;gill rakers (including rudiments) 2 on upper limb, 8 on lower limb.Eye diameter about 1/3 head length and slightly less than snout length.Branchiostegal rays 7.Dorsal fin divided, with 8 slender spines and 26 to 30 soft rays; anal fin with 1 minute spine and 30 to 32 soft rays; dorsal-, anal-, and pectoral-fin rays un- branched; caudal fin forked, with 11 principal rays and 9 branched rays; pectoral fin with 15 or 16 rays, shorter than eye diameter; pelvic fins with 1 unbranched and 5 or 6 branched soft rays, but no spine, fin origin posterior to a vertical at pectoral-fin base. Scales moderate in size, weakly ctenoid, and deciduous; 2 lateral lines originating on body at upper end of operculum and running posteriorly about 4 scale rows apart, gradually converging to form a single line on caudal peduncle. Caudal peduncle stout, the least depth about equal to its length and slightly less than eye diameter.Vertebrae 34.Colour: body reddish or silvery; large black blotch on anterior margin of dorsal fin.
    [Show full text]
  • Otolith Atlas for the Western Mediterranean, North and Central Eastern Atlantic
    SCIENTIA MARINA 72S1 July 2008, 7-198, Barcelona (Spain) ISSN: 0214-8358 Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic VICTOR M. TUSET 1, ANTONI LOMBARTE 2 and CARLOS A. ASSIS 3 1 Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas, Departamento de Biología Pesquera, P.O. Box. 56, E-35200 Telde (Las Palmas), Canary Islands, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Institut de Ciències del Mar-CSIC, Departament de Recursos Marins Renovables, Passeig Marítim 37-49, Barcelona 08003, Catalonia, Spain. 3 Instituto de Oceanografia e Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande 1749-016, Lisboa, Portugal. SUMMARY: The sagittal otolith of 348 species, belonging to 99 families and 22 orders of marine Teleostean fishes from the north and central eastern Atlantic and western Mediterranean were described using morphological and morphometric characters. The morphological descriptions were based on the otolith shape, outline and sulcus acusticus features. The mor- phometric parameters determined were otolith length (OL, mm), height (OH, mm), perimeter (P; mm) and area (A; mm2) and were expressed in terms of shape indices as circularity (P2/A), rectangularity (A/(OL×OH)), aspect ratio (OH/OL; %) and OL/fish size. The present Atlas provides information that complements the characterization of some ichthyologic taxa. In addition, it constitutes an important instrument for species identification using sagittal otoliths collected in fossiliferous layers, in archaeological sites or in feeding remains of bony fish predators. Keywords: otolith, sagitta, morphology, morphometry, western Mediterranean, north eastern Atlantic, central eastern Atlantic. RESUMEN: Otolitos de peces del mediterráneo occidental y del atlántico central y nororiental.
    [Show full text]
  • SCRS/1999/092 Rev. Col.Vol.Sci.Pap
    femelles étaient le Lepidopus caudatus, le Scomber japonicus et le Trachurus picturatus, que l’on a détecté dans plus de 50 % des contenus stomacaux de chaque sexe. Toutefois, il semble y avoir une différence notable entre la principale proie préférée par chaque sexe, le L. caudatus chez les femelles et le Capros aper chez les mâles. Pour ce qui est des céphalopodes, l’Ommastrephes bartramii prédominait chez les femelles (22 % des contenus stomacaux), et l’Argonauta argo et l’Histioteutis dofleini (14 %) chez les mâles. Un G-test a servi à comparer la fréquence d’apparition des groupes de proies chez les deux sexes. Aucune différence significative n’a été observée dans l’alimentation entre les mâles et les femelles. Toutefois, la présence plus fréquente de céphalopodes à déplacement rapide, comme l’Ommastrephes bartramii et le Todarodes sagittatus dans l’alimentation des femelles, comme leur absence dans celle des mâles, pourrait indiquer quelque limitation physiologique et quelque différence de comportement entre les sexes. En fait, s’il existe des différences quant au choix de l’habitat des mâles et des femelles, il pourrait également y avoir des différences quant à leur disponibilité à la pêche de palangre. RESUMEN Este documento presenta algunos resultados sobre la dieta del pez espada, Xiphias gladius, en las aguas en torno a Azores. De los 82 estómagos examinados (58 hembras y 24 machos), el 11% estaban vacíos (9 estómagos). En cuanto a los otros 73, se compara entre los sexos la composición por presas y algunas de las peculiaridades biológicas de las especies de presas.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeidae Rafinesque, 1815 - True Dories [=Zeusidi Rafinesque, 1810, Zedia Rafinesque, 1815, ?Aplodia Rafinesque, 1815] Notes: Zeusidi Rafinesque, 1810B:15 [Ref
    FAMILY Zeidae Rafinesque, 1815 - true dories [=Zeusidi Rafinesque, 1810, Zedia Rafinesque, 1815, ?Aplodia Rafinesque, 1815] Notes: Zeusidi Rafinesque, 1810b:15 [ref. 3595] (ordine) Zeus [published not in latinized form before 1900; not available, Article 11.7.2] Zedia Rafinesque, 1815:83 [ref. 3584] (family) Zeus [stem corrected to Ze- by Latreille 1825:131 [ref. 31889], confirmed by Bonaparte 1831:158, 174 [ref. 4978]; stem changed to Zen- by Lowe 1839:82 [ref. 2829], confirmed by Gill 1873:787 [ref. 17631]; stem Ze- confirmed by Nelson 1976:192 [ref. 32838] and by Nelson 2006:307 [ref. 32486]] ?Aplodia Rafinesque, 1815:84 [ref. 3584] (subfamily) ? Zeus [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] GENUS Zenopsis Gill, 1862 - John dories [=Zenopsis Gill [T. N.], 1862:126, Parazenopsis Cligny [A.], 1909:874 [1]] Notes: [ref. 1659]. Fem. Zeus nebulosus Temminck & Schlegel, 1845. Type by original designation (also monotypic). •Valid as Zenopsis Gill, 1862 -- (Wheeler 1973:349 [ref. 7190], Heemstra 1980:11 [ref. 14195], Machida in Masuda et al. 1984:118 [ref. 6441], Quéro in Whitehead et al. 1986:770 [ref. 13676], Heemstra 1986:437 [ref. 5660], Paxton et al. 1989:389 [ref. 12442], Parin 1989 [ref. 14116], Gomon et al. 1994:420 [ref. 22532], Heemstra 1999:2259 [ref. 24791], Tyler et al. 2003:36 [ref. 26742], Heemstra 2003:1209 [ref. 27043], Nakabo et al.2006:91 [ref. 28907], Paxton et al. 2006:800 [ref. 29077], Bray 2008:439 [ref. 30620], Shinohara et al. 2011:41 [ref. 31715]). Current status: Valid as Zenopsis Gill, 1862. Zeidae. (Parazenopsis) [ref. 850].
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Scientific Committee Report 2016
    SOUTH EAST ATLANTIC FISHERIES ORGANISATION (SEAFO) REPORT OF THE 12th SEAFO SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE 6 October – 14 October 2016 Windhoek, NAMIBIA The Secretariat Strand Street no. 1 Swakopmund, Namibia Phone: +264-64-406885 ___________________________ Facsimile: +264-64-406884 Chairperson: Scientific Committee Email: [email protected] Mr. Paulus Kainge Website: www.seafo.org [email protected] 1. Opening and welcome remarks by the Chairperson 1.1 The 12th Annual Meeting of the SEAFO Scientific Committee (SC) was convened on 6 October to 14 October 2016 at the Safari Hotel & Court, Windhoek, Namibia. The Chairperson, Mr. Paulus Kainge, opened the meeting and welcomed delegates. He emphasized that it would be a discussion of scientific issues and that all delegates were expected to freely express their scientific views so that issues can be resolved and the best possible advice forwarded to the Commission. 2. Adoption of agenda and meeting arrangements 2.1. SC adopted the agenda (Appendix I) with the following points added: Point 19.5: Participation in CECAF meeting on VME’s 8-10 November 2016. Point 19.6: (Japan) Scientific survey in closed area and protocol for reopening of closed areas. Members were informed of practical arrangements of the meeting by the Executive Secretary. 3. Appointment of Rapporteur 3.1 After nomination and secondment, Dr Elizabeth Voges was appointed as rapporteur for the Scientific Committee meeting. 4. Introduction of Observers 4.1 An observer from the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) attended part of the 12th SEAFO Scientific Committee (Appendix II). 5. Introduction of Delegates 5.1 A total of 10 Scientific Committee members representing five Contracting Parties, excluding the SEAFO Secretariat, attended the 12th SEAFO Scientific Committee meeting (Appendix II).
    [Show full text]
  • Relatório E Contas, Ano 2020
    RELATÓRIO E CONTAS PROJETAR A INVESTIGAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA PARA RESPONDER AO DESAFIO DO SÉCULO XXI - VIVER BEM DENTRO DOS LIMITES DO PLANETA 2020 IPMA, IP - RELATÓRIO DE ATIVIDADES 2020 ÍNDICE 1. NOTA INTRODUTÓRIA ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. ATIVIDADES REALIZADAS ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 GESTÃO ............................................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 GESTÃO FINANCEIRA ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 GESTÃO DE RECURSOS HUMANOS ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 GESTÃO DE CONTRATOS .......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.4 GESTÃO DE INFRAESTRUTURAS GENÉRICAS ............................................................................................................ 9 2.1.5 GESTÃO DE INFRAESTRUTURAS DE IT E SUPERCOMPUTAÇÃO .............................................................................. 10 2.1.6 GESTÃO DE PRODUTOS, SERVIÇOS E
    [Show full text]
  • The Diet of the Blue Shark (Prionace Glauca L.) in Azorean Waters
    THE DIET OF THE BLUE SHARK (PRIONACE GLAUCA L.) IN AZOREAN WATERS M.R. CLARKE, D.C. CLARKE, H.R. MARTINS & H.M. DA SILVA CLARKE,M.R., D.C. CLARKE, H.R. MARTINS & H.M. DA SILVA1996. The diet of the blue shark (Prionace gbauca L.) in Azorean waters. Arquipdago. Life and Marine Sciences 14A: 41-56. Ponta Delgada. ISSN 0873-4704. Stomach contents of 195 Prionace glauca caught off the Azores from October 1993 to July 1994 were studied. Eighty three had empty stomachs. Only 23 contained whole or fleshy parts of animals (other than bait) and all belonged to the fish Capros aper, Macrorhamphosus scolopax and Lepidopus caudatus and the squids Histioteuthis bonnellii and Taonius pavo. Seventy five fish otoliths and 207 cephalopod lower beaks were identified to genus or species. Considering all fragments from the stomachs, including otoliths, cephalopod beaks and eye lenses, a minimum of 1411 fish, 4 crustaceans and 261 cephalopods were represented. Approximately 386 of the fish were represented by eye lenses alone. There was a mean of 2.4 species (1.8 cephalopods and 0.6 fish) and 15.2 animals represented in each stomach. Fish rcmains occurred in 83.0% of the stomachs and contributed 84.5% of animals to the diet. Cephalopod remains occurred in 75.7% and contributed 15.5% of animals. Estimates of the weights of fish and cephalopods suggest that cephalopods are probably the most important in the diet and these were almost entirely meso- or bathypelagic, neutrally buoyant cephalopods. Small epipelagic shoaling fish were present with a few much larger near-bottom fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Sea
    OVERVIEW OF THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE MARINE FISHES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA Compiled by Dania Abdul Malak, Suzanne R. Livingstone, David Pollard, Beth A. Polidoro, Annabelle Cuttelod, Michel Bariche, Murat Bilecenoglu, Kent E. Carpenter, Bruce B. Collette, Patrice Francour, Menachem Goren, Mohamed Hichem Kara, Enric Massutí, Costas Papaconstantinou and Leonardo Tunesi MEDITERRANEAN The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ – Regional Assessment OVERVIEW OF THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE MARINE FISHES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA Compiled by Dania Abdul Malak, Suzanne R. Livingstone, David Pollard, Beth A. Polidoro, Annabelle Cuttelod, Michel Bariche, Murat Bilecenoglu, Kent E. Carpenter, Bruce B. Collette, Patrice Francour, Menachem Goren, Mohamed Hichem Kara, Enric Massutí, Costas Papaconstantinou and Leonardo Tunesi The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ – Regional Assessment Compilers: Dania Abdul Malak Mediterranean Species Programme, IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, calle Marie Curie 22, 29590 Campanillas (Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía), Málaga, Spain Suzanne R. Livingstone Global Marine Species Assessment, Marine Biodiversity Unit, IUCN Species Programme, c/o Conservation International, Arlington, VA 22202, USA David Pollard Applied Marine Conservation Ecology, 7/86 Darling Street, Balmain East, New South Wales 2041, Australia; Research Associate, Department of Ichthyology, Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia Beth A. Polidoro Global Marine Species Assessment, Marine Biodiversity Unit, IUCN Species Programme, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA Annabelle Cuttelod Red List Unit, IUCN Species Programme, 219c Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL,UK Michel Bariche Biology Departement, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon Murat Bilecenoglu Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Adnan Menderes University, 09010 Aydin, Turkey Kent E. Carpenter Global Marine Species Assessment, Marine Biodiversity Unit, IUCN Species Programme, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA Bruce B.
    [Show full text]
  • Zenopsis Conchifer (Lowe, 1852)
    Zenopsis conchifer (Lowe, 1852) AphiaID: 127426 SILVERY JOHN DORY Animalia (Reino) > Chordata (Filo) > Vertebrata (Subfilo) > Gnathostomata (Infrafilo) > Pisces (Superclasse) > Pisces (Superclasse-2) > Actinopterygii (Classe) > Zeiformes (Ordem) > Zeidae (Familia) Domínio Público Facilmente confundível com: Zeus faber Peixe-galo 1 Sinónimos Parazenopsis argenteus Cligny, 1909 Zenopsis conchifera (Lowe, 1852) Zenopsis couchifer (Lowe, 1852) Zenopsis figueirai Berg, 1895 Zenopsis ocellata (Storer, 1857) Zenopsis ocellatus (Storer, 1857) Zeus conchifer Lowe, 1852 Zeus ocellatus Storer, 1857 Referências Manual Prático de Identificação de Peixes Ósseos da Costa Continental Portuguesa – IPMA (2018) additional source Froese, R. & D. Pauly (Editors). (2018). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. , available online at http://www.fishbase.org [details] basis of record van der Land, J.; Costello, M.J.; Zavodnik, D.; Santos, R.S.; Porteiro, F.M.; Bailly, N.; Eschmeyer, W.N.; Froese, R. (2001). Pisces, in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, 50: pp. 357-374 [details] additional source McEachran, J. D. (2009). Fishes (Vertebrata: Pisces) of the Gulf of Mexico, Pp. 1223–1316 in: Felder, D.L. and D.K. Camp (eds.), Gulf of Mexico–Origins, Waters, and Biota. Biodiversity. Texas A&M Press, College Station, Texas. [details] context source (Deepsea) Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO. The Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS), available online at http://www.iobis.org/ [details] additional source Froese, R. & D. Pauly (Editors). (2018). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. , available online at http://www.fishbase.org [details] additional source McEachran, J.
    [Show full text]
  • 61661147.Pdf
    Resource Inventory of Marine and Estuarine Fishes of the West Coast and Alaska: A Checklist of North Pacific and Arctic Ocean Species from Baja California to the Alaska–Yukon Border OCS Study MMS 2005-030 and USGS/NBII 2005-001 Project Cooperation This research addressed an information need identified Milton S. Love by the USGS Western Fisheries Research Center and the Marine Science Institute University of California, Santa Barbara to the Department University of California of the Interior’s Minerals Management Service, Pacific Santa Barbara, CA 93106 OCS Region, Camarillo, California. The resource inventory [email protected] information was further supported by the USGS’s National www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Biological Information Infrastructure as part of its ongoing aquatic GAP project in Puget Sound, Washington. Catherine W. Mecklenburg T. Anthony Mecklenburg Report Availability Pt. Stephens Research Available for viewing and in PDF at: P. O. Box 210307 http://wfrc.usgs.gov Auke Bay, AK 99821 http://far.nbii.gov [email protected] http://www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Lyman K. Thorsteinson Printed copies available from: Western Fisheries Research Center Milton Love U. S. Geological Survey Marine Science Institute 6505 NE 65th St. University of California, Santa Barbara Seattle, WA 98115 Santa Barbara, CA 93106 [email protected] (805) 893-2935 June 2005 Lyman Thorsteinson Western Fisheries Research Center Much of the research was performed under a coopera- U. S. Geological Survey tive agreement between the USGS’s Western Fisheries
    [Show full text]