Assessing Functional Needs of Rock Climbing Pants by Dawn Marie

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessing Functional Needs of Rock Climbing Pants by Dawn Marie Assessing Functional Needs of Rock Climbing Pants by Dawn Marie Michaelson A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Apparel Auburn, Alabama May 10, 2015 Keywords: functional design, rock climbing pants, outdoor apparel, FEA model Copyright 2015 by Dawn Marie Michaelson Approved by Karla P. Teel, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Consumer and Design Sciences, Auburn University Veena Chattaraman, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Consumer and Design Sciences, Auburn University Helen Koo, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Design, University of California, Davis Abstract The objective of this exploratory study was to assess the functional needs of outdoor rock climber pants by looking at fit, mobility, comfort, protection, and donning/doffing, based on the functional category of the Functional, Expressive, Aesthetic (FEA) Consumer Needs Model. Data from 185 active rock climbers was collected by questionnaire at two rock climbing events. The study utilized a mixed methods approach with open-ended questions being analyzed with grounded theory, and quantitative data analyzed by descriptive statistics and repeated measure ANOVA. Participants reported mild satisfaction with pant fit. Pant mobility was only slightly satisfying and was affected by the type of climbing technique performed. Climbers rated pants as uncomfortable after climbing and only somewhat protective and durable in knees, seat, and crotch. Based on these results improvements in climbing pant fit, design, and fabric performance would improve the functional pant needs for rock climbers. ii Acknowledgments This thesis would not have been possible without the love, understanding, and support of my husband, Chris, who not only introduced me to rock climbing but moved across the United States, and has made countless sacrifices so I could pursue my dream. He truly makes me feel like I could do anything, and I could not imagine completing my graduate studies without him. I would like to thank my mother, and many other family members, for their understanding and continuous love. In addition, I would like to thank my fellow graduate students, especially Amber Ortlieb, for their love, support, and fellowship over these past two years. You have all become wonderful friends. Equally important has been the support and guidance of my major professor, Dr. Karla P. Teel, and I would like to thank her for her time and constant encouragement. Your willingness to be my mentor and guide my professional development has meant a great deal to me. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Veena Chattaraman and Dr. Helen Koo, for their caring nature, expertise, and support throughout this entire process. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Pamela Ulrich for always having an open door and taking the time to answer my questions. Lastly, I would like to acknowledge and thank Dr. Carol Warfield for providing me with the endless opportunities that has allowed me to excel beyond my personal expectations. You all have made my Auburn experience truly life changing. iii Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. vii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. ix Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Problem Statement .......................................................................................................... 1 Objective ......................................................................................................................... 2 Significance of Study ...................................................................................................... 3 Assumptions .................................................................................................................... 4 Definition of Terms ......................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 Literature Review ....................................................................................................... 6 Functional Apparel Classifications ................................................................................. 6 Rock Climbing ................................................................................................................ 9 Rock Climbing Techniques .................................................................................... 10 Types of Rock Climbing ......................................................................................... 13 Rock Climbing Clothing and Gear ........................................................................ 16 Pants .................................................................................................................. 16 Shirts/Tops ........................................................................................................ 17 Shoes ................................................................................................................. 17 iv Gear ................................................................................................................... 17 Functional Needs for Outdoor Climbing ............................................................... 18 Fit ...................................................................................................................... 18 Mobility ............................................................................................................. 19 Comfort ............................................................................................................. 21 Protection .......................................................................................................... 25 Donning/Doffing ............................................................................................... 27 Conceptual Framework ................................................................................................. 29 Chapter 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................. 31 Research Design ............................................................................................................ 31 Sampling Procedures and Sample Characteristics ........................................................ 31 Instrumentation ............................................................................................................. 33 Fit ...................................................................................................................... 33 Mobility ............................................................................................................. 35 Comfort ............................................................................................................. 38 Protection .......................................................................................................... 39 Donning/Doffing ............................................................................................... 40 Face Validity ................................................................................................................. 43 Data Collection Procedures ........................................................................................... 43 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................ 44 Reliability Analysis ....................................................................................................... 45 Research Question Analysis ......................................................................................... 46 Chapter 4 Results ....................................................................................................................... 53 v Study Sample Demographics ........................................................................................ 53 Research Question Analysis ......................................................................................... 56 Additional Findings ...................................................................................................... 81 Pant design details ............................................................................................. 81 Prior pant dislikes ............................................................................................. 82 Important pant features ..................................................................................... 85 Additional Comments ................................................................................................... 87 Chapter 5 Discussion, Implications, and Limitations ................................................................ 89 Fit Satisfaction .............................................................................................................. 90 Mobility and Wearability .............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 2. the Climbing Gym Industry and Oslo Klatresenter As
    Norwegian School of Economics Bergen, Spring 2021 Valuation of Oslo Klatresenter AS A fundamental analysis of a Norwegian climbing gym company Kristoffer Arne Adolfsen Supervisor: Tommy Stamland Master thesis, Economics and Business Administration, Financial Economics NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS This thesis was written as a part of the Master of Science in Economics and Business Administration at NHH. Please note that neither the institution nor the examiners are responsible − through the approval of this thesis − for the theories and methods used, or results and conclusions drawn in this work. 2 Abstract The main goal of this master thesis is to estimate the intrinsic value of one share in Oslo Klatresenter AS as of the 2nd of May 2021. The fundamental valuation technique of adjusted present value was selected as the preferred valuation method. In addition, a relative valuation was performed to supplement the primary fundamental valuation. This thesis found that the climbing gym market in Oslo is likely to enjoy a significant growth rate in the coming years, with a forecasted compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in sales volume of 6,76% from 2019 to 2033. From there, the market growth rate is assumed to have reached a steady-state of 3,50%. The period, however, starts with a reduced market size in 2020 and an expected low growth rate from 2020 to 2021 because of the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on this and an assumed new competing climbing gym opening at the beginning of 2026, OKS AS revenue is forecasted to grow with a CAGR of 4,60% from 2019 to 2033.
    [Show full text]
  • Tradclimbing+ the Positive Approach to Improving Your Climbing
    TradCLIMBING+ The positive approach to improving your climbing Adrian Berry John Arran Uncredited photos by Adrian Berry Other photos as credited Illustrations by Ray Eckermann Printed by Clearpoint Colourprint Distributed by Cordee (www.cordee.co.uk) Published by ROCKFAX Ltd. December 2007 © ROCKFAX Ltd. 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise without prior written permission of the copyright owner. A CIP catalogue record is available from the British Library. ISBN 978 1 873341 91 9 www.rockfax.com Cover: Adrian Berry on Cockblock (E5), Clogwyn y Grochan, Snowdonia, Wales. This page: Steve Ramsden on Fay (E4), Lower Sharpnose, Cornwall, England. Alex Barrows on the crux of Quietus (E2) Stanage Edge, The Peak District, England. Contents 3 Introduction (4) Starting Out (8) Tactics (190) Introduction A guide for newcomers showing the Tactics is about how to best use the skills various ways to get into trad climbing, the you already have to get those routes in important differences between climbing the bag and is a major part of the climbing Starting Out indoors and outside, plus an introduction game. to the key safety skills and terminology. The Mind (206) Gear (28) Gear For many climbers, the mind is the weakest A comprehensive look at the myriad of gear link. By taking a more positive approach available, with advice on what to buy to your mind can be turned from being a build up your climbing rack. weakness to being your best asset.
    [Show full text]
  • Larry Land Climbing Topo
    90 BOWMAN AREA CRAGS BOWMAN AREA CRAGS 91 Bowman Dam 21 18 17 14 21 19 21 20 16 1 15 4 2 23 13 22 3 12 Small 5 11 Cave 7 6 10 8 Approach 9 Larry Land N39° 26.648' W120° 39.256' Toprope the plumb line below the anchor on Gary Land. 7 Larry Land 70' 5.11c dam. When the road ends, follow a rough walkway up the right 4 Gary Land 45' 5.10d Mike Carville, Gary Allan, Josh Horniak, Spring 2008. Exposure: South. Afternoon sun, no shade. side of the drainage, then cross the drainage via a concrete Mike Carville, Josh Horniak, Fall 2008. 9 bolts. LO. Elevation: 5,480' spillway. After 40' cross back to the south side of the spillway 7 bolts. LO. A crag classic, this route is typified by athletic climbing on good Summary: Sport climbing. and ascend a low-angle rock slab to reach the large, concrete 25' left of Yuba Blue, this route begins on a short corner (crux), holds. Begin climbing the steep, broken rock immediately right Approach: 5 minutes, 0.2 miles. concourse directly below the dam. Reach the wall by ascend- then continues ascending the wall with more-moderate diffi- of the central cave. Trend generally left while aiming for the left Immediately below the Lake Bowman dam lies the south-fac- ing the talus field to the right of some large boulders. culty (5.9). Trend rightward from the mid-route corner. end of a shallow roof feature located above a gold-tinged slab.
    [Show full text]
  • Layout 1 Copy
    STACK ROCK 2020 An illustrated guide to sea stack climbing in the UK & Ireland - Old Harry - - Old Man of Stoer - - Am Buachaille - - The Maiden - - The Old Man of Hoy - - over 200 more - Edition I - version 1 - 13th March 1994. Web Edition - version 1 - December 1996. Web Edition - version 2 - January 1998. Edition 2 - version 3 - January 2002. Edition 3 - version 1 - May 2019. Edition 4 - version 1 - January 2020. Compiler Chris Mellor, 4 Barnfield Avenue, Shirley, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 8SE. Tel: 0208 662 1176 – E-mail: [email protected]. Send in amendments, corrections and queries by e-mail. ISBN - 1-899098-05-4 Acknowledgements Denis Crampton for enduring several discussions in which the concept of this book was developed. Also Duncan Hornby for information on Dorset’s Old Harry stacks and Mick Fowler for much help with some of his southern and northern stack attacks. Mike Vetterlein contributed indirectly as have Rick Cummins of Rock Addiction, Rab Anderson and Bruce Kerr. Andy Long from Lerwick, Shetland. has contributed directly with a lot of the hard information about Shetland. Thanks are also due to Margaret of the Alpine Club library for assistance in looking up old journals. In late 1996 Ben Linton, Ed Lynch-Bell and Ian Brodrick undertook the mammoth scanning and OCR exercise needed to transfer the paper text back into computer form after the original electronic version was lost in a disk crash. This was done in order to create a world-wide web version of the guide. Mike Caine of the Manx Fell and Rock Club then helped with route information from his Manx climbing web site.
    [Show full text]
  • Wadi Daykah Climbing Guide Ross Weiter, 4Th Edition, May 2007
    Wadi Daykah Climbing Guide Ross Weiter, 4th Edition, May 2007 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wadi Daykah Guide, May 2007 Page 1 of 11 Cover: Kim Vaughn and Bill Huguelet do the business on “Al Kirobi” (6a), photo: Ross Weiter A WARNING ABOUT ROCK CLIMBING Climbing is a sport where you may be seriously injured or killed. Read this before you use this guide. This guide is a compilation of often-unverified information gathered from many different climbers. The author(s) cannot assure the accuracy of any of the information in this guide, including the route descriptions and the difficulty ratings. These may be incorrect or misleading as it is impossible for any one author to climb all the routes and confirm all the information. Some routes listed in the guide have had only one ascent and the information has not been verified. Also, ratings are subjective and depend on the physical characteristics such as height, experience, technical ability, confidence and physical fitness of the climber who supplied the ratings. Therefore, be warned that you must exercise your own judgement with regard to the route location, description, difficulty and your ability to safely protect yourself from the risks of rock climbing. Examples of these risks are: falling due to technical difficulty or holds breaking off, falling rock, climbing equipment dropped by other climbers, equipment failure and failure of protection including fixed protection such as bolts. You should not depend on any information gleaned from this guide for your personal safety. Your safety depends on your own experience, equipment and climbing skill. If you have any doubt as to your ability to safely attempt any route described in this guide, do not attempt it.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Yosemite Climbing 219
    MODERN YOSEMITE CLIMBING 219 MODERN YOSEMITE CLIMBING BY YVON CHOUINARD (Four illustrations: nos. 48-5r) • OSEMITE climbing is the least known and understood, yet one of the most important, schools of rock climbing in the world today. Its philosophies, equipment and techniques have been developed almost independently of the rest of the climbing world. In the short period of thirty years, it has achieved a standard of safety, difficulty and technique comparable to the best European schools. Climbers throughout the world have recently been expressing interest in Yosemit e and its climbs, although they know little about it. Until recently, even most American climbers were unaware of what was happening in their own country. Y osemite climbers in the past had rarely left the Valley to climb in other areas, and conversely few climbers from other regions ever come to Yosemite; also, very little has ever been published about this area. Climb after climb, each as important as a new climb done elsewhere, has gone completely unrecorded. One of the greatest rock climbs ever done, the 1961 ascent of the Salethe Wall, received four sentences in the American Alpine Journal. Just why is Y osemite climbing so different? Why does it have techniques, ethics and equipment all of its own ? The basic reason lies in the nature of the rock itself. Nowhere else in the world is the rock so exfoliated, so glacier-polished and so devoid of handholds. All of the climbing lines follow vertical crack systems. Nearly every piton crack, every handhold, is a vertical one. Special techniques and equipment have evolved through absolute necessity.
    [Show full text]
  • What the New NPS Wilderness Climbing Policy Means for Climbers and Bolting Page 8
    VERTICAL TIMES The National Publication of the Access Fund Summer 13/Volume 97 www.accessfund.org What the New NPS Wilderness Climbing Policy Means for Climbers and Bolting page 8 HOW TO PARK LIKE A CHAMP AND PRESERVE ACCESS 6 A NEW GEM IN THE RED 11 WISH FOR CLIMBING ACCESS THIS YEAR 13 AF Perspective “ The NPS recognizes that climbing is a legitimate and appropriate use of Wilderness.” — National Park Service Director Jonathan Jarvis his past May, National Park Service (NPS) Director Jonathan Jarvis issued an order explicitly stating that occasional fixed anchor use is T compatible with federally managed Wilderness. The order (Director’s Order #41) ensures that climbers will not face a nationwide ban on fixed anchors in NPS managed Wilderness, though such anchors should be rare and may require local authorization for placement or replacement. This is great news for anyone who climbs in Yosemite, Zion, Joshua Tree, Canyonlands, or Old Rag in the Shenandoah, to name a few. We have always said that without some provision for At the time, it seemed that fixed anchors, technical roped climbing can’t occur — and the NPS agrees. the tides were against us, The Access Fund has been working on this issue for decades, since even before we officially incorporated in 1991. In 1998, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) that a complete ban on fixed issued a ban on fixed anchors in Wilderness (see photo inset) — at the time, it anchors in all Wilderness seemed that the tides were against us, that a complete ban on fixed anchors in all Wilderness areas was imminent.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Balcony - Dirty Devil
    GARDEN BALCONY - DIRTY DEVIL Rating: 3A I Length: 2-4 hours Gear: Ascending gear required. Maps: Burr Point, UT; Rappels: 1+ to 27 m ( 89 ft. ) Water: Generally little or none. Flash Flood Danger: Moderate Season: Any, hot in the summer Waypoints: Trailhead 12S 543796mE 4230932mN N38° 13' 31" W110° 29' 59" Downclimb Off Ridge 12S 544401mE 4231837mN N38° 14' 00" W110° 29' 34" Rappel 12S 544143mE 4231701mN N38° 13' 56" W110° 29' 44" Rappel 12S 544216mE 4231406mN N38° 13' 46" W110° 29' 41" Hype Garden Balcony is a short, easy canyon that offers some short narrows, a few easy downclimbs, and a neat patch of vegetation in an otherwise rocky landscape. The biggest attraction is the spectacular views of the Dirty Devil River and the sporting approach. It could be combined with Tumbleweed Balcony to the North to make a full day. This route was originally contributed by user tacovan. Several people had commented the climbing was a bit trickier than they expected. I finally visited in the spring of 2016, and have updated the description. Tags: canyon, advanced, access: high clearance Trailhead From Hanksville drive south on the Hwy 95 to Mile 10 and then turn left (east) onto the road to Angel Point. Reset at the Cattle Guard ( 12S 530870mE 4232076mN / N38° 14' 10" W110° 38' 50" ) 2.4 miles - Right On 0101 ( 12S 534101mE 4232785mN / N38° 14' 33" W110° 36' 37" ) 3.3 miles - Cattle Guard ( 12S 535083mE 4231909mN / N38° 14' 04" W110° 35' 57" ) 5.9 miles - Junction with 0103 Stay Right ( 12S 538059mE 4230240mN / N38° 13' 10" W110° 33' 55" ) 6.2 miles - Stay Left ( 12S 538464mE 4230109mN / N38° 13' 05" W110° 33' 38" ) 8.4 miles - Junction at water tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Super Slab Topo
    Gaudi Wall & Super Slab Gaudi Wall & Super Slab This tight collection of crags offers the best climbing in this book, and some Top Ten of the best metamorphic sport climbing on the Front Range. The quality of the rock and proximity to Denver ensure these crags will be incredibly popular. As such, it is ESSENTIAL that climbers treat these areas with respect. In particular, be courteous to the many local residents who have Casa Batllo, 5.10b enjoyed this quiet canyon for decades: • DRIVE SLOWLY throughout the canyon, but especially in residential areas Littering And…, 5.10b • CAR POOL – An abundance of cars along the road will be our undoing Mustache Ride, 5.10b • KEEP NOISE DOWN – this is a wobbler-free zone: Please no screaming, honking horns, playing music or foul language Mindians, 5.11a • PETS ON LEASH – There are many wild animals about (including moose, Wrench Wrun, 5.12a mount lions & bear), but mostly we don’t want to disturb the locals • BE COURTEOUS & respectful to anyone you encounter—it never hurts to Sagrada Familia, 5.12a say “Thank you for sharing this beautiful area with us” The Underflinger, 5.12b Don’t Let Go, 5.13a On Till the End, 5.13c Striking Distance, 5.14b Mark A powering up The Best Revenge, 5.13a, Gaudi Wall. Photo Evan Howell Super Slab This clean slab of granite is a great destination for families, recreational climbers, and aspiring slab masters. The rock is very-high-quality granite with a few gneiss and pegmatite intrusions, but even the pegmatite here is very good.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Rock Climbing Indicators
    WILDERNESS ROCK CLIMBING INDICATORS AND CLIMBING MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE by Katherine Y. McHugh A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geography, Applied Geospatial Sciences Northern Arizona University December 2019 Approved: Franklin Vernon, Ph.D., chair Mark Maciha, Ed.D. Erik Murdock, Ph.D. H. Randy Gimblett, Ph.D. ABSTRACT WILDERNESS ROCK CLIMBING INDICATORS AND CLIMBING MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE KATHERINE Y. MCHUGH This pilot study addresses the need to characterize monitoring indicators for wilderness climbing in the National Park Service (NPS) as which are important to monitoring efforts as components in climbing management programs per Director’s Order #41, Section 7.2 Climbing. This research adopts a utilitarian conceptual framework suited to applied management objectives. Critically, it advances analytical connections between science and management through an integrative review of the resources informing park planning; including law and policy, climbing management documents, academic research on climbing management, recreation ecology, and interagency wilderness character monitoring strategies. Monitoring indicators include biophysical, social, and administrative topics related to climbing and are conceptually structured based on the interagency wilderness character monitoring model. The wilderness climbing indicators require both field and administrative monitoring; field monitoring of the indicators should be implemented by climbing staff and skilled volunteers as part of a patrol program, and administrative indicators mirror administrative wilderness character monitoring methods that can be carried out by a park’s wilderness coordinator or committee. Indicators, monitoring design, and recommended measures were pilot tested in two locations: Grand Canyon and Joshua Tree National Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Tacoma Mountaineers Intermediate Climbing Manual
    TACOMA MOUNTAINEERS Intermediate Climbing Manual 2016 Table of Contents Welcome to the Tacoma Mountaineers _______________________________________________________________________ 3 Course Information _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 Course Description _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 2016 Intermediate Course Roster _______________________________________________________________________________ 7 Course Policies and Requirements _____________________________________________________________________________ 11 General Notes __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 11 Late for Lecture / Absenteeism Policy _______________________________________________________________________________________ 11 Conservation Requirement ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 11 Winter Overnight Requirement ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 11 Basic Climbing Field Trip Teaching Requirement __________________________________________________________________________ 12 Mentor Program ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 13 Rope Leader, Climb Leader, & Graduation Policies __________________________________________________________ 15 Rope Lead Process ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Climbing Management Plan/ Finding of No Significant Impact
    FINAL CLIMBING MANAGEMENT PLAN/ FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT February 1995 Devils Tower National Monument Crook County, Wyoming U.S. Dc:nartment of the Interior National Park Service Rocky Mountain Region Final Climbing Management/ Finding of No Significant Impact Devils Tower National Monument Crook County, Wyoming This Final Climbing Management Plan (FCMP)/Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for Devils Tower National Monument sets a new direction for man_ aging climbing activity at the tower for the next three to five years. Its purpose is to protect the natural and cultural resources of Devils Tower and to provide for visitor enjoyment and appreciation of this unique feature. The tower will be managed as a significant natural and cultural resource. The National Park Service will manage Devils Tower as primarily a crack climbing site in such a way that will be more compatible with the butte's geology, soils, vegetation, nesting raptors, visual appearance, and natural quiet. Recreational climbing at Devils Tower will be managed in relation to the tower's significance as a culturat resource. No new bolts or fixed pitons will be permitted on the tower, though replacement of existing bolts and fixed pitons will be allowed. In this way, the NPS intends that there be.no new physical impacts to Devils Tower. In respect for the reverence many American Indians hold for Devils Tower as a sacred site, rock climbers will be asked to voluntarily refrain from climbing on Devils Tower during the culturally significant month of June. The monument's staff will begin interpreting the cultural significance of Devils Tower for all visitors along with the more traditional themes of natural history and rock climbing.
    [Show full text]