Crime Moderate Risk Organised Criminal Groups Are Active Along Northern Areas Along the Border with Kosovo and in Skopje, but They Do Not Target Foreigners

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crime Moderate Risk Organised Criminal Groups Are Active Along Northern Areas Along the Border with Kosovo and in Skopje, but They Do Not Target Foreigners Riskline / Country Report / 29 August 2021 NORTH MACEDONIA Overall risk level High Reconsider travel Can be dangerous and may present unexpected security risks Travel is possible, but there is a potential for disruptions Overview Emergency Numbers Medical 194 Upcoming Events 01 September 2021 - 02 September 2021 Medium risk: Entry requirements to be tightened from 1 September – Update Effective 1 September, all inbound travellers are required to present either a negative COVID-19 PCR test result no older than 72 hours prior to entry, proof of full vaccination against COVID-19 or proof of having recovered from COVID-19 within the previous 45 days; transit travellers who stay less than five hours are exempted. Macedonian citizens who arrive without these documents must quarantine for seven days upon entry. Riskline / Country Report / 29 August 2021 / North Macedonia 2 Travel Advisories Riskline / Country Report / 29 August 2021 / North Macedonia 3 Summary North Macedonia is a High Risk destination: reconsider travel. High Risk locations can be dangerous and may present unexpected security risks. Travel is possible, but there is a potential for severe or widespread disruptions. Covid-19 High Risk In August 2021, the country saw a sharp uptick in new COVID-19 cases due to the spread of the delta virus variant. A health pass system is in effect for some public venues. Political Instability Medium Risk There are longstanding tensions and animosity between the country's ethnic Albanians and Macedonian nationalists, which remain despite the efforts of the European Union (EU) and pro-West Prime Minister Zoran Zaev to give ethnic Albanians more local power. Tensions in ties with Bulgaria are hindering negotiations for North Macedonia's EU membership. Conflict Moderate Risk Following the brief 2001 civil war between ethnic Albanians and Macedonian government forces, political violence significantly decreased, but tensions remain. Terrorism Moderate Risk The country is not at great risk of terror attacks as it is not a target nor a haven for known terror groups, but attacks by hardline Albanian nationalists are possible. Police and emergency response services are adequate. Riskline / Country Report / 29 August 2021 / North Macedonia 4 Unrest Moderate Risk Protests over political and ethnic issues as well as football are common and can turn violent. Most rallies are limited to Skopje, Ohrid, Bitola, Kavadarci and Kičevo. Crime Moderate Risk Organised criminal groups are active along northern areas along the border with Kosovo and in Skopje, but they do not target foreigners. Petty crime is common in market and tourist areas. Police services are generally reliable, yet hindered by a lack of resources and demands for bribes. Natural and Environmental Moderate Risk The country is vulnerable to earthquakes and flash floods during heavy rainfall and the winter and spring season. The infrastructure in Skopje and the rest of the country is hardly adequate, but emergency response services are generally good, yet less so if natural disasters are very large or take place in remote areas. Health and Medical Medium Risk Health facilities around the country suffer from chronic shortages of medicine and equipment. Mosquito- and tick-borne diseases, including West Nile virus, are present in the country. Local Travel Moderate Risk Road travel is generally safe, but road conditions and driving habits can be poor in rural areas. Air travel is safe and public transport services, buses specifically, are good, excluding rail travel due to poor maintenance. Petty crime is a frequent problem on public transport. Riskline / Country Report / 29 August 2021 / North Macedonia 5 Political Overview : Medium Risk In May 2017, Social Democratic Union (SDSM) leader Zoran Zaev formed a new government in partnership with Albanian minority parties. Despite the creation of a new government, protests that began the previous year over the December 2016 election results continued, becoming increasingly nationalistic in tone as conservatives accused Zaev of selling the country out to foreign powers. Since 2017, the opposition VMRO-DPMNE has led protests against Zaev’s government and plans to solve the name dispute with Greece by changing the country name to North Macedonia, which was ratified by Parliament in January 2019, paving the way for the country to join NATO. However, the failure of the European Union (EU) to commit to a firm timetable for North Macedonia's ascension process led to Zaev calling snap elections for April 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the elections were delayed until July and saw sharply reduced turnout. After a month of talks, the SDSM formed a coalition with the Democratic Union for Integration (DUI) minority Albanian party on 18 August 2020 by agreeing to rotate Zaev out as prime minister before the next round of elections planned in 2024. There are no recent incidents Riskline / Country Report / 29 August 2021 / North Macedonia 6 Conflict : Moderate Risk Civil War: In 2001, violence broke out between ethnic Albanians and Macedonian government forces. The conflict was low-intensity, with upwards of 70 deaths over the course of the year and over 100,000 people internally displaced. It ended in August 2001 with the signing of the Ohrid Framework Agreement between the government and representatives of the ethnic Albanian community. Most Albanian groups that once posed a serious threat, such as the National Liberation Army (NLA), have now disbanded. The Albanian National Army (ANA) opposed this disbanding and it, alongside other NLA factions, continue to demand greater autonomy or separatism for ethnic Albanians in North Macedonia. Ethnic Tensions: The security situation in North Macedonia has stabilised since the brief civil war in 2001. Clashes involving ethnic Albanian militants and criminal gangs associated with them are now rare, though certain areas are still subject to violence, including areas north and to the west of Gostivar, Tetovo, Skopje, Kumanovo, and along the highways that link these cities. While attacks directed against travellers are unlikely, the possibility of being caught up in violence remains. Amid a political crisis that began after the April 2014 general elections, a series of attacks targeting the government and security forces took place, with rejectionist factions of the NLA claiming several of them, including an attack on the government building in Skopje in October 2014, a successful weapons heist at a police base on the Kosovo border in April 2015 and grenade attacks targeting political party offices. These security incidents eventually culminated in May 2015, when police special forces fought a large body of ethnic Albanian militants in the northern city of Kumanovo over two days. Eight police officers and 14 gunmen were killed before order was restored; 30 people were ultimately arrested on terrorism charges over the clashes. While no serious disturbances took place during the 2017 nationalist protests over the formation of a government with ethnic Albanian parties comparable to the deadly events of 2014-2015, unanticipated domestic or regional events have the potential to spark further violence involving ethnic Albanian militants who continue to dispute the post-2001 peace terms. Border Disputes: Prior to Kosovo’s declaration of independence, the Government of Kosovo stated before that they intended to question the location of their country’s Riskline / Country Report / 29 August 2021 / North Macedonia 7 border with North Macedonia. They claim it was decided between Macedonia and the Former Yugoslavia in the late 1990s and bears no relation to the ethnic or geographic territory of Kosovo. However, since Kosovan independence in February 2008, relations between the two sides have improved. There is now a low risk of conflict regarding this border. There are also deep-rooted tensions between Athens and Skopje over the use of the name “Macedonia”. Greece has traditionally believed that by allowing Skopje to use the name, the country would be enabled to make territorial claim over the northern Greek region of the same name. With Greece insisting that the country should have been known by a different name, the version ‘Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)’ was often used internationally on Greece’s request . A breakthrough happened on 17 June 2018, when Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras and Macedonian Prime Minister Zoran Zaev agreed to rename FYROM as ‘Republic of Northern Macedonia’. The agreement, which would pave the way to Skopje's accession to the European Union (EU) and the NATO, was met with resistance from portions of the population in both countries. The deal was ratified by the Macedonian parliament in early July and a referendum to amend the constitution was set to be held in autumn 2018. Riskline / Country Report / 29 August 2021 / North Macedonia 8 Terrorism Domestic Terrorism: Domestic terrorism in North Macedonia is primarily motivated by ethnic nationalist grievances from hardline Albanian nationalists with prior experience fighting both Serbian and North Macedonian forces across the former Yugoslavia since the 1990s. The most serious incident in recent years involved a faction of the pro-Albanian National Liberation Army that clashed with security forces in Kumanovo in May 2015 [see Ethnic Tensions in the Conflict section]. Overall, however, attacks by Albanian nationalist groups have decreased sharply in recent years, while the core of the NLA has disbanded as part of the post-civil war
Recommended publications
  • W O Rk in G P Aper S E Rie S
    EENeT – Working Paper Series Annual EENeT Conference 2014 in Ávila/ES and EENeT Subgroup Meeting 2015 at CEPOL in Budapest / HU Focussing Radicalisation June 2014 – Mai 2016 EWPS – 003 Aug 2015 EENeT Working Paper Series - 003 Aug 2015 About the European Expert Network on Terrorism Issues The EENeT is an independent, non-partisan consortium of terrorism experts from European law enforcement agencies / relevant authorities and the field of science It is dedicated to a multi-disciplinary and multi-agency analysis and research which is seen as a prerequisite to provide comprehensive insights into the complexity of the phenomenon "terrorism". For more information, visit www.european-enet.org Editorial Mechthild Hellbach – Dr. Uwe Kemmesies Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), Germany Editorial Board - EENeT Steering Committee Peter Gridling Federal Agency for State Protection and Counter Terrorism (BVT), Austria Gert Vercauteren Coordination Organ for the Analysis of the Threat (OCAM/OCAD), Belgium Dr. Uwe Kemmesies Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), Germany Prof. Dr. Marco Lombardi Catholic University (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Italy Drs. Michael Kowalski National Coordinator for Counterterrorism (NCTV), Netherlands Nigel Inkster United Kingdom, International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) Note The EENeT Working Paper Series is not a peer-reviewed journal. The EWPS contain summaries of conference presentations as well as other findings provided by members or working groups of the EENeT in the periods between the annual meetings, which have been approved for publication by the authors. Responsibility for the content lies with the author/authors. The EENeT does not pursue any (security-) political goals and acts solely as publisher which is why the EENeT may not be identified with the content of the relevant publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Albanian National Army
    Response to Information Request ZZZ102898.E Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada www.irb-cisr.gc.ca Français Home Contact Us Help Search canada.gc.ca Home > Research > Responses to Information Requests RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) New Search | About RIRs | Help The Board 27 August 2008 About the Board ZZZ102898.E Biographies Organization Chart Kosovo/Albania: Albanian National Army (Armata Kombetare Shqiptare, AKSh) operating in Kosovo Employment Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa Legal and Policy References Background Publications Tribunal Jane's Information Group, an intelligence provider used by business, Refugee Protection government and military decision-makers (n.d.), reports that the Albanian National Division Army (Armata Kombetare Shqiptare, AKSh) has existed since 1999 (6 Apr. 2005). In slight contrast, a Southeast European Times (SE Times) article states that the Immigration Division AKSh was established in 2001 (14 Nov. 2007). Immigration Appeal Division A Kosovo-based Research Associate at Durham University who specializes in Decisions security matters stated in a telephone interview with the Research Directorate that the AKSh is a pan-Albanian movement that seeks to unify all Albanian-speaking Forms territories (Research Associate 30 July 2008; AP 21 Nov. 2007) including Albania, Statistics Kosovo, southern Serbia, western Macedonia, southern Montenegro (PHW 2007 Research 2007, 19-20) and northern Greece (Research Associate 30 July 2008; see also BIRN 2008). Similarly, Freedom House states that the AKSh supports "creating a Research Program 'Greater Albania' in the Balkans" (2008). In contrast, Arberi, identified by two National media sources as the leader of the AKSh (B92 21 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Narcotics Funded Terrorists/Extremist Groups
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF NARCOTICS-FUNDED TERRORIST AND OTHER EXTREMIST GROUPS A Report Prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress under an Interagency Agreement with the Department of Defense May 2002 Researchers: LaVerle Berry Glenn E. Curtis Rex A. Hudson Nina A. Kollars Project Manager: Rex A. Hudson Federal Research Division Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 20540−4840 Tel: 202−707−3900 Fax: 202−707−3920 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.loc.go v/rr/frd/ Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Narcotics-Funded Terrorist/Extremist Groups PREFACE This global survey, based entirely on open sources, is intended to provide an assessment of the nexus between selected anti-U.S. terrorist and extremist groups in the world and organized crime, specifically drug trafficking, and how this relationship might be vulnerable to countermeasures. More specifically, the aim is to help develop a causal model for identifying critical nodes in terrorist and other extremist networks that can be exploited by Allied technology, just as counterdrug technology has been used in the war against drug trafficking. To this end, the four analysts involved in this study have examined connections between extremist groups and narcotics trafficking in the following countries, listed by region in order of discussion in the text: Latin America: Triborder Region (Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay), Colombia, and Peru; the Middle East: Lebanon; Southern Europe (Albania and Macedonia); Central Asia: Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan; and East Asia: Philippines. These are preliminary, not definitive, surveys. Most of the groups examined in this study have been designated foreign terrorist organizations by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Razor's Edge: Macedonia Ten Years After Independence2
    In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2001, Baden-Baden 2002, pp. 117-135. Alice Ackermann1 On the Razor's Edge: Macedonia Ten Years after Independence2 Introduction The emergence of an armed insurgency movement in Macedonia, over the last few months, has demonstrated once more that the Balkans remains a con- flict-prone region, and that Macedonia continues to be in a vulnerable posi- tion. After escaping the fate of its more unfortunate neighbours for nearly ten years and being hailed as the only former Yugoslav republic to secede with- out bloodshed, Macedonia now finds itself at the abyss of war. Once an ex- ample for the relative success of preventive diplomacy initiated on the part of a number of indigenous and international actors, Macedonia is quickly be- coming an example of failure to act preventively. Although Macedonia's peaceful secession from Yugoslavia has often been viewed as incidental, some international and domestic efforts were devoted to preventing the outbreak of ethnic war in the early years of independence. For years, Macedonia's multi-ethnic governments pursued a policy of accommo- dation and power-sharing, if only on a limited basis, gradually expanding the rights of all its ethnic minorities, not only those of Macedonian Albanians. The Working Group on Ethnic and National Communities and Minorities of the International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia (ICFY) led negotia- tions between ethnic Albanians and the Macedonian government on the ex- pansion of minority rights. The United Nations deployed preventive peace- keepers (United Nations Preventive Deployment Force, UNPREDEP) to Ma- cedonia's borders with Serbia and Albania, the first and only preventive mis- sion in the history of that organization.
    [Show full text]
  • War in the Balkans, 1991-2002
    WAR IN THE BALKANS, 1991-2002 R. Craig Nation August 2003 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications Office by calling (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or be e-mail at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/ ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-134-2 ii CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Map of the Balkan Region. viii 1. The Balkan Region in World Politics . 1 2. The Balkans in the Short 20th Century . 43 3. The State of War: Slovenia and Croatia, 1991-92.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Albania – the Next Crisis in the Balkans?
    School of Social Science Department of Peace and Development Studies Master Thesis Spring 2009 Greater Albania – The Next Crisis in the Balkans? Author: Mimoza Ardolic Tutor: Manuela Knapp ABSTRACT University of Växjö, School of Social Sciences, Department of Peace and Development Studies Master Thesis Title: Greater Albania – The Next Crisis in the Balkans? Author: Mimoza Ardolic Tutor: Manuela Knapp Date: 2009-06-08 The Balkans has suffered from quite a few problems as a result of the countless ambitious endeavors for great states of the ethnic groups residing in the peninsula. The most recent great state idea to have caused troubles in the region is the Serbs’ Great Serbia (i.e. Yugoslvia), which caused a cycle of wars, the latest one being the war in Kosovo in the late 1990s. This thesis attempts to evaluate the rumors of yet another great state in the making – or rather awakening again: the attempt at a Greater Albania, and whether the Albanians in the Balkans are still harboring the idea of any such state. Particular emphasis is placed upon the following questions: Where does the idea of a Greater Albania stem from? Is a Greater Albania today still on the Albanians’ agenda as a real political plan? What speaks for and against a Greater Albania? Is the idea even feasible? The findings indicate that none of the Albanian communities residing in the Balkan region wish for a Greater Albania, nor do their leaders. The Serbs nonetheless maintain that an Albanian threat exists and has done so ever since 1878 when the idea of a Greater Albania first arose.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia a Conflict Analysis
    OCTOBER 2003 • DIVISION FOR SOUTH-EAST EUROPE A conflict analysis Macedonia Contents Acronyms ..................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary ...................................................................... 5 Recent History .............................................................................. 7 Albanian Grievances ........................................................................... 7 The security crisis in 2001 ................................................................... 8 The Ohrid Agreement ........................................................................ 8 Security Dimensions .................................................................... 10 Regional factors ................................................................................. 11 The name issue .................................................................................. 12 The Kosovo factor ............................................................................. 13 Enhanced Regional Co-operation..................................................... 14 Internal security threats..................................................................... 14 Arms proliferation ............................................................................. 16 Unexploded Ordnance and Landmines ........................................... 17 Militant groups .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Operation of the Albanian Mafia in the Republic of Macedonia
    VARSTVOSLOVJE, Journal of Criminal Justice and Security Operation year 15 no. 2 of the Albanian Mafia pp. 190–202 in the Republic of Macedonia Aleksandar Ilievski, Bojan Dobovšek Purpose: Albanian mafia currently represents a threat to the entire Europe, while Macedonia, a country with a 25% Albanian minority, is one of the most threatened countries in Europe. In this article, we have elaborated in more detail the scope, vision and modus operandi of the Albanian mafia in human trafficking, illegal arms and drug trade in Europe, especially in Macedonia, a country that is considered one of the home countries of the Albanian mafia. The aim is to explain the transformation of the National liberation army (NLA) into Democratic Union for Integration (DUI) and investigate underlying interconnection between the NLA with the Albanian mafia. Design/Methods/Approach: The methods employed include analysis of existing literature along with previously published interviews, certain statistical data, as well as opinions of people who have been interviewed in person due to their extensive experience in the fight against organized crime in Macedonia. Findings: During the research, the actual condition regarding the impact of the Albanian mafia in Macedonia has been investigated, and it was concluded that, both in Macedonia and throughout Europe, there was a need for more rigorous treatment of the strategy how to deal with the mafia. The thesis that the NLA has direct links with the Albanian mafia has been proven. Research Limitations/Implications: The main focus was on the progress of its activities in Macedonia, although the Albanian mafia operates on a far larger territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of Internal Displacement : Macedonia
    PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : MACEDONIA Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 26 August, 2002) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 6 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND OF DISPLACEMENT 9 BACKGROUND OF THE CONFLICT 9 THE ETHNIC ALBANIAN MINORITY DEM ANDED EQUALITY WITH THE ETHNIC MACEDONIAN MAJORITY (JUNE 2001) 9 POLITICAL BREAKTHROUGH WITH SIGNING OF INDEPENDENT CEASE-FIRES WITH NATO (JULY 2001) 11 POLITICAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN MACEDONIAN PARTIES PAVED WAY FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION (AUGUST 2001) 11 MACEDONIAN AUTHORITIES MADE CONCESSIONS AND FINALLY REACHED DEAL ON AMNESTY ISSUE (DECEMBER 2001-MARCH 2002) 12 MACEDONIAN POLICE WAS SCHEDULED TO RETURN TO ALBANIAN VILLAGES, BUT PROTEST AROSE (DECEMBER 2001) 13 ETHNIC ALBANIAN SEPARATISTS WARNED OF FURTHER CONFLICT (JANUARY 2002) 14 LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT LAW IMPROVED RIGHTS OF ETHNIC ALBANIANS (JANUARY 2002) 15 POLITICAL AND HUMANIT ARIAN STATUS QUO AS OF MARCH 2002 15 NEW RULES WERE ADOPTED ON USE OF ALBANIAN LANGUAGE, BUT MAJOR OBSTACLES REMAIN (JUNE 2002) 16 MACEDONIA TO HOLD PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS ON 15
    [Show full text]
  • THE CONSTRUCTION of ALBANIAN MARTYRDOM in the REPUBLIC of MACEDONIA an NCEEER Working Paper by Vasiliki Neofotistos State University of New York at Buffalo
    THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALBANIAN MARTYRDOM IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA An NCEEER Working Paper by Vasiliki Neofotistos State University of New York at Buffalo National Council for Eurasian and East European Research University of Washington Box 353650 Seattle, WA 98195 [email protected] http://www.nceeer.org/ TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Vasiliki Neofotistos NCEEER Contract Number: 826-15g Date: October 26, 2012 Copyright Information Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicate and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract or Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER’s own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows: (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United States Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended).
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ...........................................................................................................................V ALBANIA ...............................................................................................................................2 Political developments ..........................................................................................................2 Police ill-treatment and torture .............................................................................................. 2 Conditions of detention.........................................................................................................2 Trafficking........................................................................................................................... 3 Domestic violence against women.......................................................................................... 3 BELARUS ...............................................................................................................................3 International concern about human rights............................................................................... 3 Freedom of expression, association and assembly (Update to AI Index: EUR01/012/2005) ........... 4 Prisoners of conscience (updates to AI Index: EUR 01/001/2004 and AI Index: EUR 49/017/2004) 5 Death penalty (update to AI Index: EUR 01/001/2004) ............................................................ 5 BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA.........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Conflicts Report - Yugoslavia
    Armed Conflicts Report - Yugoslavia Armed Conflicts Report Serbia and Montenegro (ex-Yugoslavia) - Kosovo (1998 - first combat deaths) Update: January 2007 Summary Type of Conflict Parties to the Conflict Status of the Fighting Number of Deaths Political Developments Background Arms Sources Summary: 2006 Decentralization talks began in January and continued throughout the year, though a final decision on Kosovo’s status was delayed until 2007. Kosovo president Ibrahim Rugova died in January and was replaced by Fatmir Sejdui. Serbian PM Konstunica continued to reject requests for independence, and Serbs living in Kosovo continued to boycott the Kosovar government and its institutions, despite efforts by Kosovo’s newly appointed PM Agim Ceku to reach out to the Serb minority. A number of small scale attacks were reported. However, as the death toll remained very minimal for the second year in a row, this conflict has been removed from current Armed Conflicts Report. 2005 Sporadic violence continued but declined from the previous years. The UN Security Council decided that talks on the final status of Kosovo would begin in 2006. 2004 Violent riots in March killed over 30 people and were quelled only when additional NATO peacekeepers were deployed to the effected areas. While tensions declined after March, groups observing the region warned the UN Interim Administration in Kosovo (UNMIK) of the danger of violence flaring again. 2003 Violence between the ethnic-Albanian and Serbian populations continued in 2003, although at a lower intensity than in previous years. Despite tensions between the two groups, there were several confidence- building measures undertaken to further reconciliation.
    [Show full text]