DOCSLIB.ORG

The Place of Values Within the Safe Streets and Communities Act

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Place of Values Within the Safe Streets and Communities Act Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 10-23-2018 2:00 PM Ideology Over Evidence? The Place of Values Within the Safe Streets and Communities Act Alyssa Holden The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Adams, Tracey L The University of Western Ontario Huey, Laura The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Sociology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Alyssa Holden 2018 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Inequality and Stratification Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, and the Theory, Knowledge and Science Commons Recommended Citation Holden, Alyssa, "Ideology Over Evidence? The Place of Values Within the Safe Streets and Communities Act" (2018). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5858. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5858 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract In the context of Canadian policymaking, the alleged ‘punitive turn’ demonstrated by the Harper government from 2006-2015 was extraordinary. Under this turn, punitiveness coincided with a rejection of empirical evidence (Kelly and Puddister, 2017; Doob and Webster, 2015 2016; Marshall, 2015; Newell, 2013 Mallea, 2010). The controversial bill, the Safe Streets and Communities Act, has been regarded as one of the most poignant examples of this rhetoric (Marshall, 2015; Newell, 2013). This thesis investigated the role of evidence and penal populism in policymaking through a content analysis of the legislative debates of the SSCA. Drawing on a neo-Weberian framework this thesis finds that the motives of state actors may be complex, balancing self interest with populism, and concerns for efficiency with moral values (White and Prentice, 2013; Stevens, 2011; Zhao, 2009; Faught 2007; Tickamyer, 1981). Keywords Policy analysis; policymaking in Canada; evidence-based policymaking; penal populism in Canada; criminal justice policy in Canada; The Safe Streets and Communities Act; Canadian exceptionalism Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................ v Chapter 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Literature Review.......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Theoretical views of the state ................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Weber and Neo-Weberian theory ........................................................................................ 10 2.3. A “Punitive Turn”: Canada Before and During the Harper Government ........................... 16 2.3.1 Penal Populism .............................................................................................................. 16 2.3.2 State Paternalism ........................................................................................................... 21 2.3.3 Evidence-based Policy and Politics .............................................................................. 23 2.4 The Safe Streets and Communities Act ............................................................................... 29 2.5 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 32 Chapter 3 ........................................................................................................................................ 34 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 34 3.1 Research questions ............................................................................................................... 34 3.2 Data ...................................................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Symbolic Framing ................................................................................................................ 36 3.3 Methodical Strategy ............................................................................................................. 37 3.3.1 Familiarization .............................................................................................................. 38 3.3.2 Identifying Thematic Framework ................................................................................. 38 3.3.3 Indexing ........................................................................................................................ 42 3.3.4 Interpretation ......................................................................................................................... 46 3.4 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 46 Chapter 4 ........................................................................................................................................ 48 4.0 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 48 4.1 Tables: Most Frequent Supporting and Opposing Frames ................................................... 49 Table 4.1.1: Most Frequent Supporting Frames .................................................................... 49 ii Table 4.1.2: Most Frequent Opposing Frames ....................................................................... 50 4.2 Findings – Supporting Frames ............................................................................................. 51 4.2.1 Victim advocacy ........................................................................................................... 51 4.2.2 Safer streets in Canada .................................................................................................. 53 4.2.3 Harmful Drug Production and Dealing ......................................................................... 54 4.2.4 Protecting Society from Dangerous Youth ................................................................... 56 4.2.5 Offender Responsibility, Punishment and State Paternalism ........................................ 58 4.2.6 Personal Narrative ......................................................................................................... 61 4.2.7 Bill has Been Debated at Length................................................................................... 65 4.2.8 Use of Scientific Evidence or Experts .......................................................................... 66 4.2.9 Recognizing Concern for Indigenous Communities ..................................................... 69 4.2.10 Summary of Supporting Frames ................................................................................. 71 4.3 Findings- Opposing frames .................................................................................................. 72 4.3.1 Use of Scientific Evidence or Experts .......................................................................... 72 4.3.2 Advocacy for Marginalized Populations ....................................................................... 74 4.3.3 Punitive Penal Populist Rhetoric................................................................................... 78 4.3.4 Hidden Cost of the SSCA ............................................................................................. 79 4.3.5 Canadian Exceptionalism .............................................................................................. 81 4.3.6 Prevention, Rehabilitation and State Responsibility ..................................................... 84 4.3.7 Personal Narrative ......................................................................................................... 86 4.3.8 Bill has not been Debated Enough ................................................................................ 87 4.3.9 Removal of Judge Discretion ........................................................................................ 89 4.4 Summary .......................................................................................................................... 90 Chapter 5 .......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guelph: a People's Heritage
    “Buying a Reid’s Heritage Home” is a long-time Guelph tradition. Since 1978, the Reid’s Heritage Group has expanded that tradition by building homes for thousands of Guelph families, in many of our City’s favourite communities. It all started with Orin Reid building just a few houses in the first year. Today, we are the City’s leading Builder, responsible for building more than one in three new homes constructed in the City of Guelph. From all of us at the Reid’s Heritage Group on this 175 th Birthday, Congratulations & Thank you Guelph. Let’s keep growing together! BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS OF FINE COMMUNITIES www.reidsheritagegroup.com CaringCaring forfor Guelph,Guelph, CaringCaring forfor CanadaCanada Beginning in 1883 with Stephen Lett, our first Medical Superintendent and a pioneer in addiction medicine, until today with 650 staff members who work within Homewood Corporation and its three subsidiaries, Homewood has proudly maintained a tradition of caring, innovation and excellence. We’re honoured to have been an integral part of Guelph’s heritage for the past 118 years and proud of our contribution to the health and well-being of the people of Guelph, surrounding communities, and across Canada. As a local, provincial, national and international resource, Homewood is sought after as a leading, quality provider of mental and behavioural health care, and a provider of care for older adults. Homewood Manor, 1915 Occupational therapy Norm Ringler, (1920) Homewood’s chauffeur with Homewood’s first car. Norm is Homewood’s longest- serving employee with 50 years of service. Homewood grounds, 1923 150 Delhi Street • Guelph, ON N1E 6K9 • Tel: (519) 824-1010 • Fax: (519) 824-3361 • www.homewood.org Homewood Health Centre is a 312-bed Oakwood Retirement Communities Inc., Homewood Behavioural Health Corporation mental and behavioural health facility, is a joint venture involving Homewood (HBH) is a Canadian leader with 25 years’ offering unique and highly specialized Corporation and R.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..88 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 16.25)
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 015 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, November 6, 2013 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 805 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, November 6, 2013 The House met at 2 p.m. health of our oceans is fundamental to our precious environment and to Canada's economy. Prayers The CCORU universities do world-class research, including at the University of Victoria, but there is a pressing need for better integration of science in ocean management and use. Industry, Ï (1405) government and universities must work together to ensure a healthy [English] ocean ecosystem for generations to come. The Speaker: It being Wednesday, we will have the singing of our national anthem led by the hon. member for Lethbridge. While we face real challenges, I believe we can build a modern, [Members sang the national anthem] balanced Canada and create good jobs without sacrificing our environment. The path to achieve that goal should be guided by the best science and research possible. I commend CCORU for prompting this report, and urge members of the House and all STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS Canadians to take its findings very seriously. [English] *** CANADA-HONDURAS FREE TRADE AGREEMENT Mr. Randy Hoback (Prince Albert, CPC): Mr. Speaker, he has done it again. Yesterday, the hon. Minister of International Trade SIR FREDERICK BANTING signed yet another free trade deal, this time with the Republic of Honduras. Mr. Ed Holder (London West, CPC): Mr. Speaker, Sir Frederick Banting has been recognized as a great humanitarian, a Nobel Prize With the new Canada-Honduras FTA, Canadian exporters, winner, a gifted artist, the discoverer of the formula for insulin, and if service providers and investors will benefit from enhanced market I may say with huge pride, a great Londoner.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Debates
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 094 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, June 2, 2014 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 5961 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, June 2, 2014 The House met at 11 a.m. Hamilton, and which I am on most days when I am back in the constituency. Prayers Despite all of these accomplishments and many more, above all else Lincoln Alexander was a champion of young people. He was convinced that if a society did not take care of its youth, it would have no future. He also knew that education and awareness were PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS essential in changing society's prejudices and sometimes flawed presuppositions about others. That is why it is so fitting that so many Ï (1105) schools are named after him. He himself had been a young person [English] who sought to make his place in his community so that he could contribute to his country. LINCOLN ALEXANDER DAY ACT Mr. David Sweet (Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—West- As a young boy, Lincoln Alexander faced prejudice daily, but his dale, CPC) moved that Bill S-213, An Act respecting Lincoln mother encouraged him to be two or three times as good as everyone Alexander Day, be read the second time and referred to a committee. else, and indeed he was. Lincoln Alexander followed his mother's He said: Mr. Speaker, I was proud to introduce Bill S-213, an act advice and worked hard to overcome poverty and prejudice.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Report Card
    Corporate Accountability for Canada’s Mining, Oil and Gas Sectors Abroad Parliamentary Report Card anadian extractive sector companies have a significant presence around the world, including in developing and emerging economies.1 Increasingly, Canadian companies’ overseas operations are associated with Ccredible accusations of human rights abuse- including forced labour, sexual violence and involuntary relocation. The Government of Canada has an important role to play in promoting corporate accountability and an obligation to ensure that Canadian companies respect international human and labour rights wherever they operate. This Parliamentary Report Card documents • the commitments made by Canadian federal political parties to adopt corporate accountability mechanisms in Canada and • the MP voting record on legislation to create an Ombudsman for the international extractive sector in Canada. 1VOTING RECORD: DOES YOUR MP SUPPORT THE CREATION OF AN EXTRACTIVE SECTOR OMBUDSMAN? (See a detailed breakdown of how MPs voted on the next pages) Second Reading Vote on Bill C-584, Extractive Sector Ombudsman Bill October 1, 2014 Voted in SUPPORT of the Ombudsman bill Voted AGAINST the Ombudsman bill Conservative Party: 0 Conservative Party: 149 New Democratic Party: 86 New Democratic Party: 0 Liberal Party: 34 Liberal Party: 0 Bloc Québécois: 2 Bloc Québécois: 0 Green Party: 2 Green Party: 0 Independent: 3 Independent: 1 1 For example, over half of the world’s mining and mineral exploration companies are headquartered in Canada, with operations
    [Show full text]
  • 41St GENERAL ELECTION 41 ÉLECTION GÉNÉRALE
    www.elections.ca CANDIDATES ELECTED / CANDIDATS ÉLUS a Se n n A col ol R Lin inc ELECTORAL DISTRICT PARTY ELECTED CANDIDATE ELECTED e L ELECTORAL DISTRICT PARTY ELECTED CANDIDATE ELECTED C er d O T S M CIRCONSCRIPTION PARTI ÉLU CANDIDAT ÉLU C I bia C D um CIRCONSCRIPTION PARTI ÉLU CANDIDAT ÉLU É ol A O N C C t C A Aler 35050 Mississauga South / Mississauga-Sud Stella Ambler N E H !( A A N L T e 35051 Mississauga—Streetsville Brad Butt R S E 41st GENERAL ELECTION C I B 41 ÉLECTION GÉNÉRALE NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR 35052 Nepean—Carleton Pierre Poilievre T I A Q S Phillip TERRE-NEUVE-ET-LABRADOR 35053 Newmarket—Aurora Lois Brown U H I s In May 2, 2011 E T L 2mai,2011 35054 Niagara Falls Hon. / L'hon. Rob Nicholson E - É 10001 Avalon Scott Andrews B E 35055 Niagara West—Glanbrook Dean Allison A 10002 Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor Scott Simms I N Niagara-Ouest—Glanbrook I Z E 10003 Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte Hon. / L'hon. Gerry Byrne L R N D 35056 Nickel Belt Claude Gravelle a E A n 10004 Labrador Peter Penashue N L se 35057 Nipissing—Timiskaming Jay Aspin N l n E e S A o d E 10005 Random—Burin—St. George's Judy Foote E D P n und ely F n Gre 35058 Northumberland—Quinte West Rick Norlock E e t a L s S i a R U h AXEL 10006 St. John's East / St.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..254 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 16.25)
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 035 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, January 27, 2014 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 2081 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, January 27, 2014 The House met at 11 a.m. With this in mind, let us talk about the motion moved by my colleague, Motion No. 428. Several members, myself included, are of the opinion that it will improve parliamentary debate so that it more accurately reflects what really matters to Canadians. Prayers As the NDP critic on digital issues, I am often asked to evaluate new technologies that will enhance communication with our Ï (1105) constituents, with the hope that they will become more involved in [English] the debates. For instance, the Internet is an excellent tool for sharing information and making people aware of important current issues. VACANCY FORT MCMURRAY—ATHABASCA At present, although Canadians can get information and learn more about an issue, they cannot take action by signing an online The Speaker: It is my duty to inform the House that a vacancy petition. In fact, their online signatures are absolutely worthless in has occurred in the representation, namely Mr. Jean, member for the this House. This is a serious flaw. In this digital age, the House does electoral district of Fort McMurray—Athabasca, by resignation not reflect how the world works today. The fact that only paper effective Friday, January 17, 2014. petitions can be submitted is a flaw. Many people sign electronic [Translation] petitions, but their voices will never be heard here.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Index
    FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ◆ MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ◆ AGENCIES / ROWN ORPORATIONS ◆ SENATORS C C ◆ ANADIAN MBASSIES BROAD ◆ FEDERAL MINISTRIES C E A 34 / FEDERAL RIDINGS Federal Political Parties The twelve federal political parties currently registered with Elections Canada Bloc Québécois Conservative Party of Canada Marijuana Party Gilles Duceppe, Party Leader Stephen Harper, Party Leader Blair T. Longley, Party Leader Rm. 533-S, Centre Block, House of National Headquarters National Headquarters Commons, Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 130 Albert St., Ste. 1720, 2050 Bourbonniere Avenue, Phone: 613-992-6779 Ottawa, ON K1P 5G4 Canada Montreal, QC H1W 3P1 Canada FAX: 613-954-2121 Phone: 613-755-2000, 866-808-8407 Phone: 514-526-2116 E-Mail: [email protected] FAX: 613-755-2001 E-Mail: [email protected] National Headquarters World Wide Web: www.conservative.ca World Wide Web: 3750 Crémazie Blvd. East, Ste. 307, www.marijuanaparty.com Montreal, QC H2A 1B6 Canada The Green Party of Canada Phone: 514-526-3000 Elizabeth May, Party Leader Marxist-Leninist Party of FAX: 514-526-2868 E-Mail: [email protected] Canada World Wide Web: National Headquarters Sandra L. Smith, Party Leader www.blocquebecois.org 300-396 Cooper St., P.O. Box 666, Stn. C, Ottawa, ON K2P 2H7 Canada Montreal, QC H2L 4K4 Canadian Action Party Phone: 866-868-3447 National Headquarters Constance (Connie) Fogal, Party Leader FAX: 613-482-4632 1867 Amherst St., National Headquarters E-Mail: [email protected] Montreal, QC H2L 3L7 Canada 385-916 West Broadway, World Wide Web: www.greenparty.ca Phone: 514-522-1373, 1-800-749-9553 Vancouver, BC V5Z 1K7 Canada FAX: 514-522-5872 Phone: 604-708-3372 Liberal Party of Canada E-Mail: [email protected] FAX: 604-872-1504 Michael Ignatieff, Leader E-Mail: [email protected] National Headquarters New Democratic Party World Wide Web: 81 Metcalfe St., Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Most Benevolent Parties Giving $$$ to Anti-Choice Groups from 2010-2017
    Most Benevolent Parties Giving $$$ What happened to Anti-Choice Groups with the Canada Summer Jobs From 2010-2017 program? Human Rights Wall of Shame In April 2017, the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada reported that many anti- choice groups had been getting federal government funding to hire summer students under the Canada Summer Jobs (CSJ) program – about $1.7 million since 2010! (Here’s the list with amounts and years: https://goo.gl/4C1ZsC) Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Employment Minister Patty Hajdu quickly announced that Liberal ridings would no longer award CSJ funding Under the Canada Summer Jobs program, individual MPs can gift to anti-choice groups, and organizations in their constituencies with cash grants. Here’s the top three that the government would Members of Parliament (current and former) for each party that lavished anti- look at ways to choice groups with money from 2010 to 2017. permanently change the (See our data sheet for full info: www.arcc-cdac.ca/csj/docs/party-info-sheet-csj.pdf) program to prevent any MP from allocating public A few questions to wonder about: funds to anti-choice groups. • Are MPs making anti-choice friends with taxpayer money? • Are any obligations created by bestowing these funds? In December, an • Do Liberal and New Democrat MPs understand who they’re giving attestation requirement was announced, requiring money to? eligible CSJ applicants to Top 3 MPs Giving $$$ from 2010 to 2017 tick a box attesting that their core mandate activity Conservative Party of Liberal Party of Canada New Democratic Party and the summer job Canada activity itself would respect Robert Goguen, $205,230 Brian Murphy, $72,527 Peter Julian, 29,729 Charter rights and Moncton- Moncton- New Westminster- associated human rights, Riverview-Dieppe Riverview-Dieppe Burnaby including reproductive and LGBT rights.
    [Show full text]