Mayor's Management Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mayor's Management Report LETTER FROM THE MAYOR Dear New Yorkers: Every year, the Mayor’s Management Report (MMR) offers an opportunity for us to pause and reflect on our progress, serving as an annual report to the residents of New York City. The 2015 MMR marks the first full year of data from our administration. The report reflects our standard of civic openness, and the metrics presented here are the metrics we use to evaluate our own performance. The MMR highlights the full breadth of what we do—through services routine and urgent, through programs vast and small—toward building one just and equitable city for all New Yorkers. It reveals in granular detail what is involved in the work of governing, and the efforts underway toward accomplishing the goals of this administration—with an inclusive, equitable approach to meeting the needs of all New Yorkers. Sincerely, Bill de Blasio Mayor Mayor’s Management Report Fiscal 2015 The City of New York Mayor Bill de Blasio Anthony Shorris, First Deputy Mayor Mindy Tarlow, Director Mayor’s Office of Operations September 2015 Page vi MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR New York City government is breathtaking in its scope and depth. Scores of agencies work tirelessly to keep the infrastructure of our city running and to propel forward City services to meet the needs of all New Yorkers. The Mayor’s Management Report (MMR) has been, historically, a collection of key metrics taken from individual City agencies, so the public can evaluate the efficacy of City government in areas like education, safety, housing, health and human services, public infrastructure and administrative services. More recently, in addition to reporting on performance indicators for individual agencies, the MMR has highlighted initiatives that cross multiple agencies and disciplines. The MMR spans the City’s fiscal year, July through June—this year’s report covers Fiscal 2015. Last year’s MMR was the first produced by this administration, and for the first time, each chapter opened with a Focus on Equity statement by each agency. These statements highlight our belief that effective government performance must take into account the fair delivery and quality of services across the locations and populations of our city. This focus on equity continues to evolve as agencies advance their work and launch new programs and initiatives that create a New York that is fair and accessible to all who live here. The 2015 MMR picks up where last year’s left off. We continue to emphasize multi-agency collaborations, including signature City initiatives like Pre-K for All, Vision Zero and Housing New York, as well as new efforts that began in 2015, such as IDNYC, the Mayor’s Task Force on Behavioral Health and the Criminal Justice Action Plan and Career Pathways. This year’s MMR is the first full-year report of the de Blasio administration and we are pleased to present it to you. It provides an unvarnished picture of our progress to date, from areas where we have made remarkable progress to areas where the City needs to improve—but overall we believe this report reflects the administration’s vision being realized, and a City that is responsive to the needs of its residents. Mindy Tarlow Director, Mayor’s Office of Operations Table of Contents Introduction 175 Human Resources Administration Collaborating to 185 Administration for Children’s Services 193 Department of Homeless Services Deliver Results 199 Department for the Aging 3 Housing New York 9 Pre-K for All 203 Building Human Potential 15 Hurricane Sandy Recovery 205 Department of Education 19 Vision Zero 213 School Construction Authority 25 Young Men’s Initiative 217 Department of Youth and Community 31 Mayor’s Action Plan for Development Neighborhood Safety 223 Public Libraries 37 IDNYC 227 City University of New York 41 Mayor’s Task Force on Behavioral Health 231 Department of Small Business Services and the Criminal Justice System 45 Career Pathways 237 Infrastructure and Sustainability 49 Small Business First 239 Department of Environmental Protection Agency Chapters 245 Department of Transportation 253 Department of Buildings 57 Public Safety and Access to Justice 59 New York City Police Department 259 Department of Design and Construction 67 Fire Department 75 New York City Emergency Management 265 Promoting Viable Communities and 81 Department of Correction Neighborhoods 89 Department of Probation 267 Department of City Planning 93 Civilian Complaint Review Board 273 New York City Economic Development 97 Law Department Corporation 101 Department of Investigation 279 Department of Housing Preservation 105 City Commission on Human Rights and Development 109 Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings 287 New York City Housing Authority 113 Business Integrity Commission 295 Landmarks Preservation Commission 119 Basic Services for All New Yorkers 299 Administrative Services 121 Department of Sanitation 301 Department of Citywide Administrative 127 Department of Parks and Recreation Services 135 Department of Cultural Affairs 311 Department of Records and Information 139 Department of Consumer Affairs Services 145 311 Customer Service Center 315 Department of Finance 149 Taxi and Limousine Commission 321 Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications 155 Health and Human Services 327 Board of Elections 157 Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Appendix 165 Office of Chief Medical Examiner 331 MMR User’s Guide 171 Health and Hospitals Corporation 332 Index of Agencies INTRODUCTION MAYOR’S MANAGEMENT REPORT As mandated by Section 12 of the New York City Charter, the Mayor reports to the public and the City Council twice yearly on the performance of municipal agencies in delivering services. The annual Mayor’s Management Report (MMR) covers the twelve-month fiscal year period, from July through June. The Preliminary Mayor’s Management Report (PMMR) covers performance for the first four months of the fiscal year, from July through October. The Charter provisions governing the submission of the MMR can be viewed on the Mayor’s Office of Operations’ website at www.nyc.gov/mmr. The MMR and PMMR cover the operations of City agencies that report directly to the Mayor. Three additional non-Mayoral agencies are included, for a total of 44 agencies and organizations. Activities that have direct impact on New Yorkers - including the provision of support services to other agencies - are the focus of the report. The report is organized by agency around a set of services listed at the beginning of each agency chapter. Within service areas, goals articulate the agency’s aspirations. The services and goals were developed through collaboration between the Office of Operations and the senior managers of each agency. The “Performance Indicators” tables contain the following standard information for the measurements of each agency’s goals - • In the MMR, the most recent five full fiscal years of data are presented. In the PMMR, results are shown for the first four months of the current and preceding fiscal years, in addition to three previous full fiscal years. • A star designation («) showing which indicators are deemed critical. • Numeric targets, if appropriate, allowing for the comparison of actual performance against these projected levels of service. Targets for the next year are set initially in the PMMR based on the City’s preliminary budget and are later updated in the MMR, if necessary, based on the adopted budget or revised performance expectations. Because resources affect an agency’s ability to perform, the MMR and PMMR also present, for each agency, an overview of resources used and resources projected for use including personnel levels, overtime, expenditures, revenues and capital commitments. Each agency chapter also contains information regarding how well the agency is serving its customers including timeliness in responding to e-mail, letters and service requests made through the City’s 311 Customer Service Center. At the end of each agency chapter there is a “Noteworthy Changes, Additions or Deletions” section where important changes are noted including updates and corrections to information presented in earlier MMR/PMMRs. “Additional Resources” provides the full Internet addresses of links to additional agency information and statistics, including the agency’s website. A User’s Guide identifies and describes each component of an agency’s chapter. The MMR/PMMR is available in an interactive web version as well as in the form of a printable book. The interactive web version contains additional indicators that supplement the measures contained in the book version. The entire web version can be viewed at www.nyc.gov/mmr. Three types of MMR-related information are also available at www.nyc.gov/mmr: • Definitions for each agency performance indicator including the data source. • Additional tables showing information of interest across agencies including workforce absence rates, fleet vehicle usage, inquiries to the 311 Customer Service Center and budgetary units of appropriation. • Community-level information for selected performance measures, disaggregated by local service district (community district, police precinct, or school district). This information is available through the interactive Citywide Performance Reporting (CPR) Agency Performance Mapping feature of the City’s website at www.nyc.gov/cpr. Collaborating to Deliver Results MAIN DIVIDERS | Page 1 Page 2 | MAYOR’S MANAGEMENT REPORT Collaborating to Deliver Results HOUSING NEW YORK New York City faces an affordable housing crisis.
Recommended publications
  • What More Do We Need to Know About How to Prevent and Mitigate Displacement of Low- and Moderate-Income Households from Gentrifying Neighborhoods?
    What More Do We Need to Know about How to Prevent and Mitigate Displacement of Low- and Moderate-Income Households from Gentrifying Neighborhoods? VICKI BEEN1 New York University he extent to which gentrification results in the displacement of low- and moderate-income households from neighborhoods undergoing signifi- cant change is still the subject of study and debate among urban policy researchers.2 Recent evidence suggests that, at least in areas outside low- vacancy “superstar cities”3 with intense gentrification, renters who likely Tare the most vulnerable to displacement generally do not move away from gentrifying neighborhoods at higher rates than such households move from nongentrifying areas.4 Elected officials, housing advocates, and the public, on the other hand, have no doubt that gentrification can and does cause displacement.5 There are a number of reasons the research findings on displacement may be less accu- rate or complete than reports from affected neighborhoods. First, there is considerable disagreement, especially early in the process, about which neighborhoods actually are gentrifying. Second, data tracking people’s moves to and from neighborhoods is limited because of concerns about the confidentiality of tax, social service, and other governmental data files that follow individuals over time, and because private sources of linked data, such as credit reporting bureau files, are incomplete in a variety of ways (some households don’t have credit files, for example). Third, even if residents of gentrifying neighborhoods may move no more often from gentrifying neighborhoods than similar households in other areas, they may move for different reasons. Residents of non-gentrifying neighborhoods may more often move voluntarily — seeking better neighborhoods or jobs, for example — while residents of gentrifying neighborhoods may more often move involuntarily, wanting to stay in the neighborhood but unable to afford it.
    [Show full text]
  • SCHEDULE for MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO CITY of NEW YORK Saturday, February 01, 2014
    SCHEDULE FOR MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO CITY OF NEW YORK Saturday, February 01, 2014 9:40 - 10:10 AM COMMUNICATIONS CALL Staff: Monica Klein 10:15 - 10:45 AM TOBOGGAN RUN Location: Drop off: In front of 575 7th avenue Attendees: (t)Commissioner Roger Goodell , (t)Senator Charles E. Schumer, First Lady, Dante de Blasio Press Staff: Wiley Norvell 11:00 - 11:30 AM SUPERBOWL BOULEVARD FIELD GOAL KICK Location: Superbowl Boulevard, Broadway bewtween 45th & 46th Streets Attendees: Dante de Blasio 1:50 - 3:00 PM SUPER BOWL XLVIII HANDOFF CEREMONY Location: Roman Numerals Stage Drop Off: 7th avenue b/w 42nd and 43rd street Attendees: (t) Governor Christie; (t) Governor Cuomo; Governor Brewer(Arizona); Woody Johnson, NY/NJ Super Bowl Host Committee Co-Chair & NY Jets Owner; Jonathan Tisch, NY/NJ Super Bowl Host Committee Co-Chair & NY Giants Owner ; Al Kelly, NY/NJ Super Bowl Host Committee President and CEO (Emcee); Michael Bidwill, Arizona Cardinals Owner; David Rousseau, Arizona Super Bowl Host Committee; Jay Parry, Arizona Super Bowl Host Committee CEO Press Staff: Wiley Norvell, Marti Adams 3:00 - 3:30 PM DEPART BOWL XLVIII HANDOFF CEREMONY EN ROUTE RESIDENCE Drive Time: 30 mins Car : BdB, DdB, Follow: Javon SCHEDULE FOR MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO CITY OF NEW YORK Sunday, February 02, 2014 7:00 - 7:45 AM STATEN ISLAND GROUNDHOG DAY CEREMONY Location: Staten Island Zoo 614 Broadway, Staten Island, NY Attendees: Audience: 700 people On Stage: Comptroller Scott Stringer (t); Council Member Vincent Gentile; Reginald Magwood, NYS Park Director, representing
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Parking Requirements, Transit Proximity and Development in New York City
    McDonnell, Madar & Been 1 Minimum Parking Requirements, Transit Proximity and Development in New York City Simon McDonnell* Josiah Madar Vicki Been Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy New York University 110 West 3rd Street Room 209F New York 10012 *Corresponding Author ABSTRACT New York City policymakers are planning for a city of over 9 million residents by 2030, a large increase from today. A central goal of City officials is to accommodate this increase while simultaneously improving the City’s overall environmental performance, addressing externalities arising from traffic congestion and providing increased access to affordable housing. The requirement in the City’s zoning code that new residential construction be accompanied by a minimum number of off-street parking spaces, however, may conflict with this goal. Critics argue that parking requirements bundle the cost of unnecessary new parking with new housing, not only increasing the cost of housing, but also reducing the density at which it can be built. Facilitating car ownership by requiring parking may also lead to increases in auto-related externalities. In this research, we combine a theoretical discussion of parking requirements in New York City with a quantitative analysis of how they relate to transit and development opportunity. Using lot-level data and GIS we estimate two measures of the parking requirement for each lot and at a City, borough and neighborhood level. Our results indicate that the per unit parking requirement is, on average, lower in areas near rail transit stations, consistent with the City’s development goals. However, we also find that the required number of spaces per square foot of land area is higher, on average, in these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-1: in the Matter of Campaign for One New York and United for Affordable NYC
    2016-1: In the Matter of Campaign for One New York and United for Affordable NYC July 6, 2016 The New York City Campaign Finance Board (the “Board” or “CFB”) issues this determination concerning a complaint received on February 22, 2016 from Common Cause/NY (“the Complaint”). The issue presented is whether a candidate, Bill de Blasio (“Mr. de Blasio”), and his 2017 campaign for Mayor (the “2017 Campaign”) have violated the Campaign Finance Act (“the Act”) and Board Rules by establishing and cooperating closely with Campaign for One New York (“C41NY”) and United for Affordable NYC (“UFANYC”). The Board’s central mandate is to protect the integrity of the Act and administer the Campaign Finance Program (“the Program”). The effectiveness of the Program depends on the Act’s contribution and expenditure limits, which restrict the potential influence of large special interest donors. The Board is concerned about candidates engaging in cooperation with outside organizations that have made expenditures on issue advocacy communications promoting the candidate, especially organizations that raise contributions that would be otherwise impermissible under the Act. Such cooperative activity raises the question of whether these organizations are making expenditures in connection with a covered election. The Board simultaneously issues Advisory Opinion 2016-1 to provide further guidance in this area of the law. The Advisory Opinion provides a basis for the Board to review the issue presented by the Complaint, and establishes a set of factors the Board will consider to determine whether coordinated expenditures were made in connection with a covered election. The Board has determined that C41NY is not independent of the 2017 Campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Restaurant Etakn Ititgosu P
    20160222-NEWS--0001-NAT-CCI-CN_-- 2/19/2016 8:41 PM Page 1 CRAINS ® FEBRUARY 22-28, 2016 | PRICE $3.00 NEW YORK BUSINESS GHOST RESTAURANT Order online, but don’t try to show up for a meal PAGE 13 ALSO Closing Rikers [in 5 steps] P. 6 MEATPACKING DISTRICT GROWS UP P.8 THE LIST: NEW YORK’S TOP VC FIRMS P. 11 VOL. XXXII, NO. 8 WWW.CRAINSNEWYORK.COM 08 5 NEWSPAPER 71486 01068 0 Presents The Inaugural Heritage Healthcare Innovation Awards 2016 Innovation. Commitment. Community. Join us in celebrating the healthcare leaders in the New York metropolitan community*. This May, Heritage Provider Network honors the exceptional leaders, pioneers, and trailblazers in New York healthcare in the fi rst ever Heritage Healthcare Innovation Awards. These prestigious awards recognize the best of today’s healthcare clinicians, administrators and researchers who are pioneering new modes of diagnosis, treatment and care delivery, and also impacting long-term aff ordability. Their commitment provides our communities, and our society at large, better access to more cost-eff ective and higher quality care. Finalists will be honored at a luncheon in NYC on May 16. Winners will be awarded in the following categories: Heritage Innovation in Healthcare Delivery Heritage Healthcare Leadership Award: Award: Recognizing an innovator in the Recognizing a leader in the New York area who has development of new modes of diagnosis, treatment made a signifi cant impact in their healthcare fi eld. and care who actively improves access to services This forward-thinker has forever changed the way and improves the overall quality of healthcare.
    [Show full text]
  • De Blasio Deposition
    Case 1:15-cv-05236-LTS-KHP Document 749 Filed 05/20/19 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x SHAUNA NOEL and EMMANUELLA SENAT, Plaintiffs, -against- 15-CV-5236 (LTS) (KHP) CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------x PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S MAY 8, 2019 OPINION AND ORDER (ECF 745) Craig Gurian Anti-Discrimination Center, Inc. 250 Park Avenue, Suite 7097 New York, New York 10177 (212) 537-5824 Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs Mariann Meier Wang Cuti Hecker Wang LLP 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 (212) 620-2603 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Case 1:15-cv-05236-LTS-KHP Document 749 Filed 05/20/19 Page 2 of 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................................2 POINT I THIS COURT’S DECEMBER 2018 DECISION ON PRIVILEGE ISSUES, RELEVANCE, AND MOTIVATION CONTRADICTS THE UNDERLYING MAGISTRATE JUDGE OPINION DENYING THE DEPOSITION AND
    [Show full text]
  • GAMING the SYSTEM Landlords Are Exploiting a Key Loophole to Raise Rents on Thousands of Apartments by DANIEL GEIGER
    ASKED & ANSWERED Tina Brown on hosting “Woodstock for women” PAGE 11 ROBO GARAGES The future of parking CRAINSNEWYORK.COM | APRIL 8, 2019 | $3.00 PAGE 3 SPECIAL REPORT GAMING THE SYSTEM Landlords are exploiting a key loophole to raise rents on thousands of apartments BY DANIEL GEIGER n the fall of 2013, when apartment 1E at 171 W. 81st St. was vacated, the owner did what landlords have done with tens of thousands of other rent-regulated units in the city. Stellar Management claimed it had spent a bundle Ion renovations, which—combined with the 20% rent increase permitted when a tenant leaves—allowed it to push the $647 regulat- ed monthly rent above $2,500—to the threshold at the time to make it a BUCK ENNIS market-rate unit. A few months later Stellar See RENT REGS on page 20 HARRY PULVER HARRY FINANCE Chief Financial O cer John Weisenseel said. Mutual funds pivot to VC and PE, PDQ It’s a sign of the times. Although the stock market has gone pretty much straight up Even biggest asset managers are making substantial changes since the nancial crisis, the fortunes of Wall Street’s asset-management rms have gone in the opposite direction. Investors are pour- BY AARON ELSTEIN as investors continued to yank money out of e rm managed to secure temporary o ce ing money into low-fee passively managed mutual funds that try to beat the market, a space, so the majority of employees slated for index funds and have little patience for high- BUCK ENNIS llianceBernstein’s February confer- trend that last year prompted the Manhattan transfer will be moved before the permanent er-fee funds that aim to beat the market but ence call to discuss 2018 results was investment manager to cut costs by moving Nashville headquarters is ready next year.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Boari) on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment
    STATE OF NEW YORK BOARI) ON ELECTRIC GENERATION SITING AND THE ENVIRONMENT Case No, 18-F-0758 Petition for Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need Pursuant to Public Service Law, Article 10: Progress Report 2 vvith altachments„ Submitted on Behalf of Astoria Generating Company, L.P., ,fir its GowanuS kepowering Project, Brooklyn, New York CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE hc,\g 1 B.)"(, ereby/- certify that in accordance with 16 NYCRR § 1000.5(c) a copy of the attached Progress. Report #2 ~Fill attachments has been served on behalf of Astoria Generating Company, L.P., in the above captioned matter, via regular mail or electronic nail, on the parties listed on Appendix A. Name.: i\I c. k 13 R Dated: June 17 2019 Sworn to before one this i7 "day of June 2( 19 1.15A SUCH',1- iNbei.Ywk Novik, b!, Lc - State of NO.:0i S1;6360E:26 Ocivort, Cr".011.0.• Cor6iri',51*o. FY rt,,_„1 t 7,6 Gowanus Repowering Project Case No. 18-F-0758 Appendix A Stakeholder Notification List) Updated as of June 13, 2019 Gowanus Repowering Project Case No. 18-F-0758 Federal — Elected Representatives/Agencies Hon. Kirsten E. Gillibrand Hon. Charles E. Schumer United States Senator United States Senator 780 Third Avenue, Suite 2601 780 Third Avenue, Suite 2301 New York, NY 10017 New York, NY 10017 212-688-6262 212-486-4430 Hon. Nydia M. Velazquez Hon. Jerry Nadler U.S. Representative, District 7 U.S. Representative, 10th District 266 Broadway, Suite 201 6605 Fort Hamilton Parkway Brooklyn. NY 1 121 1 Brooklyn, NY 1 1219 718-599-3658 Phone: 718-373-3198 Peter D.
    [Show full text]
  • DIFFERENTIATING EXCLUSIONARY TENDENCIES John Infranca
    DIFFERENTIATING EXCLUSIONARY TENDENCIES John Infranca* Abstract Despite an academic consensus that easing land use regulations to increase the supply of housing can help lower housing prices, local opposition to new development remains prevalent. Onerous zoning regulations and resistance to new housing persist not only in wealthy suburbs, but also in lower income urban neighborhoods. In addition to making housing more expensive, such policies increase residential segregation, exacerbate urban sprawl, and have detrimental environmental effects. If increasing supply tends to reduce costs, what explains this opposition, particularly during a period of rising housing costs? One factor is concern about the localized costs of greater density and its effect on neighborhood character and livability. There is a perception that new development may, by changing the character and desirability of its immediate neighborhood, play some role in increasing housing prices and exacerbating gentrification and displacement in lower income communities. Empirical evidence suggests this is not the case, but efforts to exclude new development and demands for greater local control over land use persist in lower income urban neighborhoods. These tendencies mirror responses in wealthier communities. This Article compares these exclusionary tendencies and asks whether there is a normative basis for differentiating them. It concludes that there is a modest case for distinct treatment, based on a combination of factors including the historical treatment of lower income urban communities, the more fragile relationship between property and personhood in such neighborhoods, the structure of local government law, and the principle of subsidiarity. However, any preferential treatment must avoid undermining broader efforts towards reducing regulatory and procedural obstacles to denser development and increased housing supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Invest in Human Services, Not Over-Policing Our Communities
    June 2nd, 2020 Mayor Bill de Blasio City Hall New York, NY 10007 RE: Invest in Human Services, Not Over-policing Our Communities Dear Mayor de Blasio, The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified what the community based organizations (CBOs) in the human services sector have always known about inequities that exist within the institutions that all New Yorkers rely on. The outrage that has been expressed in our city – and across the country – over the last few days is not solely representative of an isolated incident, it is a reflection of the anger and frustration that exists from inequity and injustice being born on the backs of communities of color, immigrants, and low-income New Yorkers over and over again. A strong social safety net is the only way that our city survives a crisis. As we experience the unprecedented intersection of a health crisis, a social justice crisis, and an economic crisis that could devastate our city for years, even decades to come, not all City agencies are bearing the burden. We were dismayed to see that the FY2021 Executive Budget makes cuts to crucial programs and social services that serve the very communities who are being hardest hit by COVID-19 — communities of color, immigrants, and low-income New Yorkers — while maintaining funding for the NYPD, an institution that too often fails to protect and serve, and disproportionately harms, these exact communities. Services like senior food programs, homeless services, youth development, employment programs, public health and others – proven tools that help us protect and serve communities – are experiencing more demand than ever before, but instead of enhancing funding to these programs, the City is proposing more cuts.
    [Show full text]
  • Gowanus Repowering Project
    PROPOSED December 2018 GOWANUS GENERATING STATION GOWANUS REPOWERING PROJECT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN Astoria Generating Company, L.P. Brooklyn, Kings County, New York New York State Siting Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment Case Number – XXX Public Involvement Plan ASTORIA GENERATING COMPANY NY 77458932v1 Prepared By: Astoria Generating Company, L.P. Gowanus Generating Station 420 2nd Avenue P.O. Box 658 Brooklyn, New York 11232 Tel: 1-833-617-9547* Email: [email protected]* Submitted to: New York State Department of Public Service Empire State Plaza Agency Building 3 Albany, NY 12223 and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Region 2 4740 21st Street Long Island City, NY 11101 *Will be operational upon issuance of the final Public Involvement Plan. Public Involvement Plan ASTORIA GENERATING COMPANY NY 77458932v1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1 SECTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................3 2.1 COMPANY PROFILE .....................................................................................................3 2.2 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED .................................................................................3 2.3 EXISTING GOWANUS STATION ................................................................................5 2.4 PROPOSED REPOWERING PROJECT ........................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • NYCEDC-Board-Annual-Meeting
    ANNUAL MEETING OF MEMBERS AND REGULAR MEETING OF DIRECTORS OF NEW YORK CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NOVEMBER 7, 2019 Table of Contents TAB Definitions ......................................................................................................................................1 Meeting of Members • Minutes of the September 27, 2019 Special Meeting of the Members ................................2 • Annual Report of the Board of Directors of New York City Economic Development Corporation for the 12-Month Fiscal Period Ended June 30, 2019 ................................3 • Election of Directors and Alternates ....................................................................................4 Meeting of Directors • Minutes of the September 27, 2019 Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors .................5 • Report of NYCEDC’s President ..........................................................................................6 • Election of Officers .............................................................................................................7 • Election of Committees .......................................................................................................8 • Property Disposition, Investment and Procurement Policies, Guidelines and Procedures ...................................................................................................................9 • Board Self-Evaluation Results ..........................................................................................10 • Mission
    [Show full text]