DOCSLIB.ORG

WDFW Washington State Recovery Plan for the Lynx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WDFW Washington State Recovery Plan for the Lynx STATE OF WASHINGTON March 2001 LynxLynx RecoveryRecovery PlanPlan by Derek Stinson Washington Department of FISH AND WILDLIFE Wildlife Program Wildlife Diversity Division WDFW 735 In 1990, the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission adopted procedures for listing and delisting species as endangered, threatened, or sensitive and for writing recovery and management plans for listed species (WAC 232-12-297, Appendix C). The lynx was classified by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission as a threatened species in 1993 (Washington Administrative Code 232-12-011). The procedures, developed by a group of citizens, interest groups, and state and federal agencies, require that recovery plans be developed for species listed as threatened or endangered. Recovery, as defined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is “the process by which the decline of an endangered or threatened species is arrested or reversed, and threats to its survival are neutralized, so that its long-term survival in nature can be ensured.” This document summarizes the historic and current distribution and abundance of the lynx in Washington, describes factors affecting the population and its habitat, and prescribes strategies to recover the species in Washington. The draft state recovery plan for the lynx was reviewed by researchers and state and federal agencies. This review was followed by a 90 day public comment period. All comments received were considered in preparation of this final recovery plan. For additional information about lynx or other state listed species, contact: Manager, Endangered Species Section Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way N Olympia WA 98501-1091 This report should be cited as: Stinson, D. W. 2001. Washington state recovery plan for the lynx. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. 78 pp. + 5 maps. On the cover: lynx photo taken by J. E. Robinson at Northwest Trek Wildlife Park; background photo by Tracy Lloyd; lynx illustration by Darrell Pruett. Washington State Recovery Plan for the Lynx Prepared by Derek W. Stinson Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Management Program 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, Washington 98501 June 2001 ________________________________________ ____________________ Director, Washington Department of Fish and Wildife Date June 2001 ii Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ..................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.............................................................vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................... vii PART ONE: BACKGROUND ................................................... 1 TAXONOMY ...................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION..................................................................... 1 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION .................................................... 2 North America ............................................................... 2 Washington.................................................................. 2 NATURAL HISTORY ............................................................... 4 Home Range................................................................. 4 Movements and Dispersal....................................................... 5 Reproduction ................................................................. 6 Mortality .................................................................... 7 Cycles...................................................................... 7 Foraging and Food ............................................................ 8 Hunting behavior. ...................................................... 8 HABITAT REQUIREMENTS ......................................................... 9 Denning Habitat .............................................................. 9 Forage Habitat............................................................... 10 Travel Habitat and Corridors ................................................... 11 POPULATION STATUS ............................................................ 12 Past ....................................................................... 12 Populations in the 1800s ................................................ 12 Populations in the 1900s ................................................ 13 Present..................................................................... 14 HABITAT STATUS ................................................................ 17 Land Ownership and Management Status ......................................... 17 Lynx Management Zones...................................................... 19 CONSERVATION STATUS ......................................................... 21 Legal Status................................................................. 21 Washington .......................................................... 21 U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service ..................... 22 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.............................. 22 Canada.............................................................. 22 Colville Tribe ......................................................... 22 June 2001 iii Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ....................................................... 22 Lynx Harvest................................................................ 22 Research ................................................................... 22 LANDSAT habitat analysis .............................................. 24 Lynx Surveys ............................................................... 24 Snow tracking and monitoring............................................ 24 Carnivore Camera Stations .............................................. 24 Volunteer Observers and Incidental Sightings ............................... 24 Hair Snags........................................................... 24 Interagency Committees....................................................... 25 State and Private Lynx Management Plans ........................................ 25 Federal Land Management Activities ............................................. 26 FACTORS AFFECTING CONTINUED EXISTENCE ..................................... 27 Southern Boreal Habitat and Lynx Population Dynamics ............................. 27 Prey Biology and Cycles................................................ 27 Metapopulation dynamics ............................................... 27 Forest Management........................................................... 28 Timber Harvest ....................................................... 28 Fire history and suppression ............................................. 29 Forest roads and recreation .............................................. 30 Grazing and grass seeding............................................... 30 Forest Management in British Columbia .................................... 30 Competition and Predation ..................................................... 31 Coyotes ............................................................. 31 Incidental Hunting and Trapping Mortalities ....................................... 32 Lynx Management in British Columbia ........................................... 32 Forest Insect Epidemics ....................................................... 35 Condition of Matrix Habitats................................................... 35 Highway barriers for lynx movements ..................................... 35 Management of Other Species of Concern: Caribou and Grizzly ....................... 36 CONCLUSION .................................................................... 37 PART TWO: RECOVERY ..................................................... 38 RECOVERY GOAL ................................................................ 38 RECOVERY OBJECTIVES.......................................................... 38 Rationale................................................................... 38 Interim recovery objectives.............................................. 38 Lynx Management Zones ............................................... 39 Lynx habitat, recovery area, and reintroductions ............................. 39 RECOVERY STRATEGIES AND TASKS .............................................. 40 REFERENCES CITED .............................................................. 45 PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS .................................................... 55 June 2001 iv Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE .................................................... 56 Appendix A. Lynx specimens collected in Washington ..................................... 59 Appendix B. Total known Lynx harvest in Washington by County, 1961-1989 .................. 63 Appendix C. Washington Administrative Code 232-12-297. Section 11 addresses Recovery Plans . 64 Appendix D. Responses to written comments received on the draft lynx recovery plan during the public comment period ............................................................. 67 Appendix E. List and Maps of Lynx Analysis Units in Washington and most recent year of lynx detections .................................................................. 74 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 1. Mean annual home ranges (km2) of lynx........................................... 5 Table 2. Density-based estimates of Washington’s lynx population by Lynx Management Zone ..... 16
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wildlife; Threatened and Endangered Species
    2009 SNF Monitoring and Evaluation Report Wildlife; Threatened and Endangered Species Introduction The data described in this report outlines the history, actions, procedures, and direction that the Superior National Forest (aka the Forest or SNF) has implemented in support of the Gray Wolf Recovery Plan and Lynx Conservation Assessment and Strategy (LCAS). The Forest contributes towards the conservation and recovery of the two federally listed threatened and endangered species: Canada lynx and gray wolf, through habitat and access management practices, collaboration with other federal and state agencies, as well as researchers, tribal bands and non-governmental partners. Canada lynx On 24 March 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designated the Canada lynx a “Threatened” species in the lower 48 states. From 2004-2009 the main sources of information about Canada lynx for the SNF included the following: • Since 2003 the Canada lynx study has been investigating key questions needed to contribute to the recovery and conservation of Canada lynx in the Western Great Lakes. Study methods are described in detail in the annual study progress report available online at the following address: http://www.nrri.umn.edu/lynx/ . These methods have included collecting information on distribution, snow tracking lynx, tracking on the ground and in the air radio-collared lynx, studying habitat use, collecting and analyzing genetic samples (for example, from hair or scat) and conducting pellet counts of snowshoe hare (the primary prey). • In 2006 permanent snow tracking routes were established across the Forest. The main objective is to maintain a standardized, repeatable survey to monitor lynx population indices and trends.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Lynx – Your Essential Brief
    Eurasian lynx – Your essential brief Background Q: Are lynx native to Britain? A: Based on archaeological evidence, the range of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) included Britain until at least 1,300 years ago. It is difficult to be precise about when or why lynx became extinct here, but it was almost certainly related to human activity – deforestation removed their preferred habitat, and also that of their prey, thus reducing prey availability. These declines in prey species may have been exacerbated by human hunting. Q: Where do they live now? A: Across Europe, Scandinavia, Russia, northern China and Southeast Asia. The range used to include other areas of Western Europe, including Britain, where they are no longer present. Q: How many are there? A: There are thought to be around 50,000 in the world, of which 9,000 – 10,000 live in Europe. They are considered to be a species of least concern by the IUCN. Modern range of the Eurasian lynx Q: How big are they? A: Lynx are on average around 1m in length, 75cm tall and around 20kg, with the males being slightly larger than the females. They can live to 15 years old, but this is rare in the wild. Q: What do they eat? A: The preferred prey of the lynx are the smaller deer species, primarily the roe deer. Lynx may also prey upon other deer species, including chamois, sika deer, smaller red deer, muntjac and fallow deer. Q: Do they eat other things? A: Yes. Lynx prey on many other species when their preferred prey is scarce, including rabbits, hares, foxes, wildcats, squirrel, pine marten, domestic pets, sheep, goats and reared gamebirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Large Carnivores in Serbia
    Status of large carnivores in Serbia Duško Ćirović Faculty of Biology University of Belgrade, Belgrade Status and threats of large carnivores in Serbia LC have differend distribution, status and population trends Gray wolf Eurasian Linx Brown Bear (Canis lupus) (Lynx lynx ) (Ursus arctos) Distribution of Brown Bear in Serbia Carpathian Dinaric-Pindos East Balkan Population status of Brown Bear in Serbia Dinaric-Pindos: Distribution 10000 km2 N=100-120 Population increase Range expansion Carpathian East Balkan: Distribution 1400 km2 Dinaric-Pindos N= a few East Balkan Population trend: unknown Carpathian: Distribution 8200 km2 N=8±2 Population stable Legal status of Brown Bear in Serbia According Law on Protection of Nature and the Law on Game and Hunting brown bear in Serbia is strictly protected species. He is under the centralized jurisdiction of the Ministry of Environmental Protection Treats of Brown Bear in Serbia Intensive forestry practice and infrastructure development . Illegal killing Low acceptance due to fear for personal safety Distribution of Gray wolf in Serbia Carpathian Dinaric-Pindos East Balkan Population status of Gray wolf in Serbia Dinaric-Balkan: 2 Carpathian Distribution cca 43500 km N=800-900 Population - stabile/slight increasingly Dinaric Range - slight expansion Carpathian: Distribution 480 km2 (was) Population – a few Population status of Gray wolf in Serbia Carpathian population is still undefined Carpathian Peri-Carpathian Legal status of Gray wolf in Serbia According the Law on Game and Hunting the gray wolf in majority pars of its distribution (south from Sava and Danube rivers) is game species with closing season from April 15th to July 1st.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Script
    Feb rua rg 1968 North Cascades Conservation Council P. 0. Box 156 Un ? ve rs i ty Stat i on Seattle, './n. 98 105 SCRIPT FOR NORTH CASCAOES SLIDE SHOW (75 SI Ides) I ntroduct Ion : The North Cascades fiountatn Range In the State of VJashington Is a great tangled chain of knotted peaks and spires, glaciers and rivers, lakes, forests, and meadov;s, stretching for a 150 miles - roughly from Pt. fiainier National Park north to the Canadian Border, The h undreds of sharp spiring mountain peaks, many of them still unnamed and relatively unexplored, rise from near sea level elevations to seven to ten thousand feet. On the flanks of the mountains are 519 glaciers, in 9 3 square mites of ice - three times as much living ice as in all the rest of the forty-eight states put together. The great river valleys contain the last remnants of the magnificent Pacific Northwest Rain Forest of immense Douglas Fir, cedar, and hemlock. f'oss and ferns carpet the forest floor, and wild• life abounds. The great rivers and thousands of streams and lakes run clear and pure still; the nine thousand foot deep trencli contain• ing 55 mile long Lake Chelan is one of tiie deepest canyons in the world, from lake bottom to mountain top, in 1937 Park Service Study Report declared that the North Cascades, if created into a National Park, would "outrank in scenic quality any existing National Park in the United States and any possibility for such a park." The seven iiiitlion acre area of the North Cascades is almost entirely Fedo rally owned, and managed by the United States Forest Service, an agency of the Department of Agriculture, The Forest Ser• vice operates under the policy of "multiple use", which permits log• ging, mining, grazing, hunting, wt Iderness, and alI forms of recrea• tional use, Hov/e ve r , the 1937 Park Study Report rec ornmen d ed the creation of a three million acre Ice Peaks National Park ombracing all of the great volcanos of the North Cascades and most of the rest of the superlative scenery.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Bear Ecology Life Systems – Interactions Within Ecosystems a Guide for Grade 7 Teachers
    BEAR WISE Black Bear Ecology Life Systems – Interactions Within Ecosystems A Guide for Grade 7 Teachers Ministry of Natural Resources BEAR WISE Introduction Welcome to Black Bear Ecology, Life Systems – Interactions Within Ecosystems, a Guide for Grade 7 Teachers. With a focus on the fascinating world of black bears, this program provides teachers with a classroom ready resource. Linked to the current Science and Technology curriculum (Life Systems strand), the Black Bear Ecology Guide for teachers includes: I background readings on habitats, ecosystems and the species within; food chains and food webs; ecosystem change; black bear habitat needs and ecology and bear-human interactions; I unit at a glance; I four lesson plans and suggested activities; I resources including a glossary; list of books and web sites and information sheets about black bears. At the back of this booklet, you will find a compact disk. It includes in Portable Document Format (PDF) the English and French versions of this Grade 7 unit; the Grades 2 and 4 units; the information sheets and the Are You Bear Wise? eBook (2005). This program aims to generate awareness about black bears – their biological needs; their behaviour and how human action influences bears. It is an initiative of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. BEAR WISE Acknowledgements The Ministry of Natural Resources would like to thank the following people for their help in developing the Black Bear Ecology Education Program. This education program would not have been possible without their contributions
    [Show full text]
  • Lynx, Felis Lynx, Predation on Red Foxes, Vulpes Vulpes, Caribou
    Lynx, Fe/is lynx, predation on Red Foxes, Vulpes vulpes, Caribou, Rangifer tarandus, and Dall Sheep, Ovis dalli, in Alaska ROBERT 0. STEPHENSON, 1 DANIEL V. GRANGAARD,2 and JOHN BURCH3 1Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 1300 College Road, Fairbanks, Alaska, 99701 2Alaska Department of Fish and Game, P.O. Box 305, Tok, Alaska 99780 JNational Park Service, P.O. Box 9, Denali National Park, Alaska 99755 Stephenson, Robert 0., Daniel Y. Grangaard, and John Burch. 1991. Lynx, Fe/is lynx, predation on Red Foxes, Vulpes vulpes, Caribou, Rangifer tarandus, and Dall Sheep, Ovis dalli, in Alaska. Canadian Field-Naturalist 105(2): 255- 262. Observations of Canada Lynx (Fe/is lynx) predation on Red Foxes ( Vulpes vulpes) and medium-sized ungulates during winter are reviewed. Characteristics of I 3 successful attacks on Red Foxes and 16 cases of predation on Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) and Dall Sheep (Ovis dalli) suggest that Lynx are capable of killing even adults of these species, with foxes being killed most easily. The occurrence of Lynx predation on these relatively large prey appears to be greatest when Snowshoe Hares (Lepus americanus) are scarce. Key Words: Canada Lynx, Fe/is lynx, Red Fox, Vulpes vulpes, Caribou, Rangifer tarandus, Dall Sheep, Ovis dalli, predation, Alaska. Although the European Lynx (Felis lynx lynx) quently reach 25° C in summer and -10 to -40° C in regularly kills large prey (Haglund 1966; Pullianen winter. Snow depths are generally below 80 cm, 1981), the Canada Lynx (Felis lynx canadensis) and snow usually remains loosely packed except at relies largely on small game, primarily Snowshoe high elevations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscover the Suiattle: Hikes and Sights
    Le Conte Chaval, Mountain Rediscover the Suiattle:Mount Hikes and Sights Su ia t t l e R o Crater To Marblemount, a d Lake Sentinel Old Guard Hwy 20 Peak Bi Buckindy, Peak g C reek Mount Misch, Lizard Mount (not Mountain official) Boulder Boat T Hurricane e Lake Peak Launch Rd na Crk s as C en r G L A C I E R T e e Ba P E A K k ch e l W I L D E R N E S S Agnes o Mountain r C Boulder r e Lake e Gunsight k k Peak e Cub Trailhead k e Dome e r Lake Peak Sinister Boundary e C Peak r Green Bridge Put-in C y e k Mountain c n u Lookout w r B o e D v Darrington i Huckleberry F R Ranger S Mountain Buck k R Green Station u Trailhead Creek a d Campground Mountain S 2 5 Trailhead Old-growth Suiattle in Rd Mounta r Saddle Bow Grove Guard een u Gr Downey Creek h Mountain Station lp u k Trailhead S e Bannock Cr e Mountain To I-5, C i r Darrington c l Seattle e U R C Gibson P H M er Sulphur S UL T N r S iv e uia ttle R Creek T e Falls R A k Campground I L R Mt Baker- Suiattle d Trailhead Sulphur Snoqualmie Box ! Mountain Sitting Mountain Bull National Forest Milk n Creek Mountain Old Sauk yo Creek an North Indigo Bridge C Trailhead To Suiattle Closure Lake Lime Miners Ridge White Road Mountain No Trail Chuck Access M Lookout Mountain M I i Plummer L l B O U L D E R Old Sauk k Mountain Rat K Image Universal C R I V E R Trap Meadow C Access Trail r Lake Suiattle Pass Mountain Crystal R e W I L D E R N E S S e E Pass N Trailhead Lake k Sa ort To Mountain E uk h S Meadow K R id Mountain T ive e White Chuck Loop Hwy ners Cre r R i ek R M d Bench A e Chuc Whit k River I I L Trailhead L A T R T Featured Trailheads Land Ownership S To Holden, E Other Trailheads National Wilderness Area R Stehekin Fire C Mountain Campgrounds National Forest I C Beaver C I F P A Fortress Boat Launch State Conservation Lake Pugh Mtn Mountain Trailhead Campground Other State Road Helmet Butte Old-growth Lakes Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Pasayten Rim Wilderness Evaluation
    May-June 2009 Pasayten Rim Wilderness Evaluation WILDERNESS EVALUATION PASAYTEN RIM - 608025 41,349 acres OVERVIEW History The area was originally inventoried as two separate roadless areas totaling approximately 15,400 acres during RARE I. The areas were Sherman Peak (12,000 acres) and Last Chance (3,400 acres). The RARE II process combined the two areas and did not recommend the area for wilderness designation. Due to nonconforming uses such as road construction and logging, 160 acres were removed from previous inventory; 10,839 acres were added to the previous inventory as they met the criteria for a potential wilderness area (PWA) as described in Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.12, Chapter 70. The following chart depicts the 1989 Okanogan Forest Land and Resource Management Plan direction for the 2006 potential wilderness area. Table 1--Management area percentages (rounded) Okanogan National Forest MA32 MA37 MA45 MA46 Recreation/ Mtn. Mineral Timber/ Scenery Goat Exploration Range Habitat 45% 11% 32% 13% Location and Access The area is located northwest of Winthrop in the northern portion of the Okanogan- Wenatchee National Forest, and consists of a long, narrow band of land along the south edge of the Pasayten Wilderness. All lands are located in Okanogan County. From Winthrop, access is provided over State Highway 20, and county and national forest roads in the Chewuch River, Eightmile Creek, Lost River, and Harts Pass areas. Geography and Topography The western portion of the area consists of a long, half mile-wide band of southwest facing slope between the Harts Pass road and the Pasayten Wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Backpacking Washington Experience
    Route Details for the Bronze Backpack, Silver Backpack, and Gold Backpack Award Badges Because the objective of the badges is to experience the variety of backpacking regions available in Washington, it’s not necessary to do each route exactly as described in the Routes & Places database or the references. A trip that follows approximately the same route with extensions or minor variations can be substituted. However, for routes whose descriptions include a “Key Experience” alternate routes must include that experience in order to qualify. Reference(s) Region Route Distance Gain Days Key Experience Notes WTA Books Olympic Peninsula Beaches 100 Classic Hikes in Washington, 2nd Edition #99 Olympic Coast North: The Shipwreck Coast 20.2 260 3 North Coast Route Backpacking Washington 1st Edition #1 South Coast Wilderness Trail - 100 Classic Hikes: Washington, 3rd Edition #2 Olympic Coast South: The Wildcatter Coast 17.5 1900 3 Toleak Point Backpacking Washington 1st Edition #2 Ozette Triangle 9.4 400 2 Cape Alava Loop (Ozette Triangle) 100 Classic Hikes: Washington, 3rd Edition #3. Shi Shi Beach and Point of the Shi Shi Beach 8.8 200 2 Arches 100 Classic Hikes: Washington, 3rd Edition #4. Olympic Peninsula Inland 100 Classic Hikes: Washington, 3rd Edition #6 Enchanted Valley 26.5 1800 3 Enchanted Valley Backpacking Washington #3 Spend at least one night in the Seven 100 Classic Hikes: Washington, 3rd Edition #8 Seven Lakes Basin 20 4000 3 Lakes Basin area. High Divide Loop Backpacking Washington #4 100 Classic Hikes in Washington 2nd Edition #98 Upper Lena Lake 14 3900 2 Upper Lena Lake Backpacking Washington #11 Hoh River to Glacier Meadows Walk the Hoh River Trail and camp at 34 4500 4 Glacier Meadows.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Lynx Petition To
    KRISTEN A. STILT KATHERINE A. MEYER Professor & Faculty Director Clinic Director CHRISTOPHER D. GREEN NICOLE E. NEGOWETTI Executive Director Clinical Instructor CEALLAIGH REDDY SARAH PICKERING Program Administrator Communications Manager PETITION To the Fish and Wildlife Service United States Department of the Interior May 13, 2021 To Revise the Special 4(d) Rule for Canada Lynx (lynx canadensis) to Rescind the Exceptions for the Captive Members of the Species Under the Endangered Species Act Lynx canadensis (photograph by the Fish and Wildlife Service) Prepared by Elizabeth MeLampy, J.D. Candidate Kate Barnekow, Clinical Fellow Katherine Meyer, Director Harvard Law School Animal Law & Policy Clinic TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 A. Petitioners ........................................................................................................................... 1 II. LEGAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 2 A. The Endangered Species Act ............................................................................................. 2 B. The Canada Lynx Is Listed as a Threatened Species. ........................................................ 5 III. THE EXCEPTIONS FOR CAPTIVE CANADA LYNX ARE UNLAWFUL. .................. 6 A. Split-Listing Captive and Wild Members of a Species Exceeds the Service’s Authority Under the Act. ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lynx, the Snow Cat Others Being the Mountain Lion and the Bobcat
    ReturnReturn OfOf TheThe SnowSnow CatCat TheThe ReintroductionReintroduction OfOf LynxLynx ToTo ColoradoColorado Acknowledgments Funding for this project was provided by US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program Grant No R-11-1, Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund (GOCO), and the sportsmen of Colorado. The Colorado Division of Wildlife gratefully acknowledges the following individuals: Kevin S. McKelvey, USDA Forest Service, Field-test Educators: Rocky Mountain Research Station, Robert Lancaster, Walsh High School, Missoula, MT, for providing lynx occurrence Walsh, CO data from 1842 through 1998. Mark Little, Broomfield High School, Broomfield, CO For assistance in developing the field test: Lyn Neve, Swink High School, Swink, CO Anne Tweed, Senior Science Consultant, Camille Schiraldi, TH Pickens Technical McREL (Mid-continent Research for Center, Aurora, CO Education and Learning) Fran Sturgis, Adams City High School, Pam Van Scotter, Director, BSCS (Biological Commerce City, CO Sciences Curriculum Study) Center for Cherie Wyatt, Burlington Middle School, Curriculum Development. Burlington, CO Nicole Knapp, Science Educator, BSCS Debbie Yeager, Moffat County High School, Craig, CO Content Advisors and Reviewers: Graphic Design: Writers: Tanya Shenk, Senior Research Darren Eurich, State of Colorado Wendy Hanophy, DOW Biologist, Mammal Research Integrated Document Solutions (IDS) Jeff Keidel, Buena Vista High School, Jeff Rucks, Head of Education, DOW Buena Vista, CO Lisa Evans, Northeast Region Illustrations:
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Guide
    HIKING GUIDE A guide to some of the best hikes in the Pacific Northwest 1 TABLE OF 28 Glacier Peak Meadows THE SEATTLE NORTHCOUNTRY 30 Old Sauk Trail CONTENTS Eight Mile Creek & Squire Creek Pass WILDERNESS PLEDGE 31 2 What to Pack 32 Fortson Ponds & Whitehorse Trail 2 How to Hike 34 Suiattle River & Image Lake Hiking Regions 36 Monte Cristo I will pack out everything I pack in. 4 38 Lime Kiln Garbage kills wildlife and destroys waterways. COASTAL 40 River Meadows County Park I will not disturb branches in the rivers. 6 COMMUNITIES SKYKOMISH/ Salmon use these areas to lay eggs. 8 Jetty Island 42 SNOHOMISH 10 Big Gulch RIVER VALLEYS 11 Japanese Gulch I will take selfies without harming myself. 44 Paradise Valley Conservation Area Do not get close to cliff edges or wildlife. 12 Spencer Island 46 Lake Dorothy 14 Kayak Point County Park 48 Lord Hill Regional Park 16 Meadowdale Beach I will not feed or touch wildlife. 49 Sultan River Canyon Trail Human food can harm our furry and feathered friends. STILLAGUAMISH/ 50 Bridal Veil Falls & Lake Serene 18 SAUK RIVER VALLEYS 52 Evergreen Mountain Lookout I will not go off the trail. 53 Johnson Ridge & Scorpion Mountain 20 Nakashima Barn It’s easier than you might think to get lost. 54 West Cady Ridge 21 Cutthroat Lake Flowing Lake Park Big Four Ice Caves 55 I will pick up after my dog. 22 Mount Dickerman Dogs feces destroys the enviorment by... 23 URBAN 24 Barlow Point 56 BASECAMP 25 Goat Lake I will pack the ten essentials.
    [Show full text]