DOCSLIB.ORG

Transforming the Way We Connect People, Cultures and Economies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transforming the Way We Connect People, Cultures and Economies ANNUAL REPORT 2020 TRANSFORMING THE WAY WE CONNECT PEOPLE, CULTURES AND ECONOMIES lufthansagroup.com lufthansagroup.com/investor-relations LUFTHANSA GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2020 1 CONTENTS 2 Key figures 86 Combined non-financial declaration 2 The Lufthansa Group 86 About this combined non-financial declaration 3 Business segments 89 Environmental concerns 98 Customer concerns 4 To our shareholders 103 Employee concerns 4 The Executive Board 108 Fighting corruption and bribery 5 Letter from the Executive Board 110 Respect for human rights 7 Report of the Supervisory Board 112 Social concerns 11 Lufthansa share 113 Responsible production and sustainability in the supply chain 14 Combined management report 114 Summary 15 Principles of the Group 118 Forecast 15 Business activities and Group structure 17 Goals and strategies 118 Macroeconomic outlook 25 Fleet and route network 118 Sector outlook 28 Employees 119 Changes in business and organisation 30 Research and development 120 Outlook Lufthansa Group 31 Legal and regulatory factors 121 Overall statement by the Executive Board on the expected development of the Lufthansa Group 32 Economic report 122 Corporate Governance 32 Macroeconomic situation 33 Sector developments 122 Supervisory Board and Executive Board 35 Course of business 123 Mandates 38 Earnings, assets and financial position 125 Disclosures in accordance with 49 Comparison with original forecast and Section 289a Paragraph 1 HGB and overall statement by the Executive Board Section 315a Paragraph 1 HGB on the economic position 128 Declaration on corporate governance in accordance with Section 289f HGB 51 Business segments and Section 315d HGB 51 Network Airlines business segment 128 Notes to the individual financial statements 59 Eurowings business segment of Deutsche Lufthansa AG (HGB) 62 Logistics business segment 65 MRO business segment 133 Consolidated financial statements 67 Catering business segment 69 Additional Businesses and Group Functions 240 Declaration by the legal representatives 71 Opportunities and risk report 241 Independent auditor’s report 71 Opportunities and risk management 251 Remuneration report 74 Opportunities and risks at an individual level 271 Further information 84 Overall statement on opportunities and risks 85 Description of the accounting-related Internal 272 Independent Auditor’s Limited Assurance Report Control System and risk management system regarding the Non-Financial Statement in accordance with Section 289 Paragraph 4 274 Report of the independent auditor on the audit and Section 315 Paragraph 4 HGB of the remuneration report pursuant to Sec. 162 (3) AktG 275 Ten-year overview 277 Glossary 279 Chart and table overview 282 Credits/Contact/Financial calendar 2021 and Disclaimer Navigation in the report per mouse click Further information Search ↗ Cross references Main table of contents Internet references Last page viewed Previous page This interactive pdf is optimised for use Next page with Adobe Acrobat. KEY FIGURES LUFTHANSA GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2020 2 The Lufthansa Group The Lufthansa Group The Lufthansa Group is an aviation group with operations worldwide. It is composed of the segments Network Airlines, Eurowings and Aviation Services. T001 KEY FIGURES LUFTHANSA GROUP 2020 2019 Change in % Revenue and result Total revenue €m 13,589 36,424 – 63 of which traffic revenue €m 9,078 28,136 – 68 Operating expenses €m 20,846 37,124 – 44 Adjusted EBITDA 1) €m – 2,890 4,718 Adjusted EBIT 1) €m – 5,451 2,026 EBIT €m – 7,353 1,857 Net profit/loss €m – 6,725 1,213 Key balance sheet and cash flow statement figures Total assets €m 39,484 42,659 – 7 Equity ratio % 3.5 24.0 – 20.5 pts Net indebtedness €m 9,922 6,662 49 Pension provisions €m 9,531 6,659 43 Cash flow from operating activities €m – 2,328 4,030 Capital expenditure (gross) 2) €m 1,273 3,559 – 64 Adjusted free cash flow 1) €m – 3,669 203 Key profitability and value creation figures Adjusted EBITDA margin 1) % – 21.3 13.0 – 34.3 pts Adjusted EBIT margin 1) % – 40.1 5.6 – 45.7 pts EBIT margin % – 54.1 5.1 – 59.2 pts ROCE % – 22.7 6.1 – 28.8 pts Adjusted ROCE 1) % – 16.7 6.6 – 23.3 pts Lufthansa share Share price at year-end € 10.82 16.41 – 34 Earnings per share € – 12.51 2.55 Proposed dividend per share € – – Traffic figures 3) Flights number 390,900 1,187,728 – 67 Passengers thousands 36,354 145,299 – 75 Available seat-kilometres millions 109,828 358,803 – 69 Revenue seat-kilometres millions 69,462 296,217 – 77 Passenger load factor % 63.2 82.6 – 19.4 pts Available cargo tonne-kilometres millions 10,591 17,379 – 39 Revenue cargo tonne-kilometres millions 7,373 10,664 – 31 Cargo load factor % 69.6 61.4 8.2 pts Employees Employees as of 31 Dec number 110,065 138,353 – 20 Average number of employees number 125,207 137,784 – 9 1) Derivation ↗ Financial strategy and value-based management, p. 21ff., Earnings, assets and financial position, p. 38ff. 2) Without acquisition of equity investments. 3) Previous year’s figures have been adjusted. Date of publication: 4 March 2021. KEY FIGURES LUFTHANSA GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2020 3 Business segments Business segments Network Airlines T002 NETWORK AIRLINES 2020 Change in % Revenue €m 6,622 – 74 The Network Airlines segment comprises Lufthansa German of which traffic revenue €m 5,488 – 76 Airlines, SWISS, Austrian Airlines and Brussels Airlines. With Adjusted EBIT €m – 4,674 their multi-hub strategy, the Network Airlines offer their Adjusted EBIT margin % – 70.6 – 77.7 pts customers a premium, high-quality product and service, Adjusted ROCE % – 27.9 – 38.8 pts and a comprehensive route network combined with the Segment capital expenditure €m 958 – 65 highest level of travel flexibility. Employees as of 31 Dec number 57,363 – 6 Eurowings T003 EUROWINGS 2020 Change in % Revenue €m 598 – 74 The Eurowings business segment includes the flight of which traffic revenue €m 579 – 75 operations of Eurowings and Eurowings Europe, as well Adjusted EBIT €m – 703 – 476 as the equity investment in SunExpress. With Eurowings, Adjusted EBIT margin % – 117.6 – 112.3 pts the Lufthansa Group has an innovative offering for Adjusted ROCE % – 43.4 – 37.6 pts price-sensitive and service-oriented customers in the Segment capital expenditure €m 106 – 17 structurally growing European direct traffic segment. Employees as of 31 Dec number 3,088 – 10 Logistics T004 LOGISTICS 2020 Change in % Revenue €m 2,757 11 In addition to Lufthansa Cargo AG, the Lufthansa Group’s of which traffic revenue €m 2,596 12 logistics specialists, the Logistics segment includes Adjusted EBIT €m 772 the airfreight container management specialist Jettainer Adjusted EBIT margin % 28.0 28.0 pts group, the time:matters subsidiary, which specialises in Adjusted ROCE % 26.2 26.2 pts particularly urgent consignments, and the equity invest- Segment capital expenditure €m 222 – 22 ment in the cargo airline AeroLogic. Employees as of 31 Dec number 4,373 – 4 MRO T005 MRO 2020 Change in % Revenue €m 3,747 – 43 Lufthansa Technik is the world’s leading independent of which external revenue €m 2,724 – 38 provider of maintenance, repair and overhaul services (MRO) Adjusted EBIT €m – 383 for civilian commercial aircraft. Lufthansa Technik AG Adjusted EBIT margin % – 10.2 – 17.2 pts serves more than 800 customers worldwide, including Adjusted ROCE % – 6.3 – 12.7 pts OEMs, aircraft leasing companies and operators of Segment capital expenditure €m 152 – 51 VIP jets, as well as airlines. Employees as of 31 Dec number 22,745 – 5 Catering T006 CATERING 2020 Change in % Revenue €m 1,305 – 61 The LSG group offers a comprehensive range of products, of which external revenue €m 1,064 – 59 concepts and services related to in-flight service. As the Adjusted EBIT €m – 284 strongest revenue driver in the LSG group, LSG Sky Chefs Adjusted EBIT margin % – 21.8 – 25.6 pts offers classical catering for airlines, as well as lounge Adjusted ROCE % – 17.3 – 23.7 pts management. After the sale of its European business, Segment capital expenditure €m 28 – 78 the LSG group still works for more than 300 airlines with Employees as of 31 Dec number 13,227 – 63 139 plants in 46 countries. TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS LUFTHANSA GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2020 4 The Executive Board The Executive Board Deutsche Lufthansa AG Carsten Spohr, Chief Executive Officer Christina Foerster, Chief Customer Officer Born in 1966, industrial engineer, Chairman of the Executive Board Born in 1971, MBA, Executive Board member since 2020, and CEO since 1 May 2014, Executive Board member since 2011, with the Lufthansa Group since 2002 with the Lufthansa Group since 1994 Harry Hohmeister, Chief Commercial Officer Detlef Kayser, Chief Operations Officer Born in 1964, diploma in commercial air transport, Executive Board Born in 1965, Aerospace engineer, Executive Board member member since 2013, with the Lufthansa Group since 1985 since 2019, with the Lufthansa Group since 2016 Michael Niggemann, Chief HR & Legal Officer Remco Steenbergen, Chief Financial Officer Born in 1974, lawyer, Executive Board member since 2020, with the Born in 1968, MBA, RegisterAccountant, Executive Board member Lufthansa Group since 2007 since 2021, with the Lufthansa Group since 2021 TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS LUFTHANSA GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2020 5 Letter from the Executive Board Ladies and gentlemen, 2020 was one of the most challenging years in the history of the Lufthansa Group. We will never forget it. The outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic dealt an unprecedented blow to the entire airline industry and this also to the Lufthansa Group. Last year, we welcomed only 36 million passengers on board our flights – a quarter of our normal passenger numbers. Our passenger airlines had to cut their capacity significantly, and for much longer and in more areas than anticipated over the course of the year.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aerologic, Air Berlin, Austrian Airlines, Avanti Air, Condor, Edelweiss
    Christian Riedel ansgar Sinnecker arne Bierhals arne Haidle adi Fuchs Bernd Oettinger edgar Hartmans Hans Dieterich Bruno Speck Markus Kirchler David Kromka Friederike Masson Dean Masson Christoph Zogg AeroLogic Air Berlin Sun Express Lufthansa Austrian Condor AeroLogic Swiss Edelweiss Austrian Condor Germania Germania Edelweiss Hans Reichert georg Manhart Frederick Mey Karl Peter Ritter Karl Kistler nila Kiefer Jarin Beikes norbert Wittmann Florian Hofer Michael Hüsser Dieter Hensel Kevin Fuchs Judith Kümmel gerhard Knäbel Austro Control Austrian AeroLogic Condor Edelweiss TMA Germania Austrian Condor InterSky Lufthansa Swiss Austrian Condor Julian alexander Hans-georg Katharina Stephan Benjamin Jan Mühle mann aleksandar Karl-Heinz Holger Susanne Maximilian Stephan asok Sebastian Benedikt gierth Rabacher Heimann Kuzmanov Krottenmüller Deloséa Rasovic Jacobsen Schweickert Scheithauer Keydel Sukumar Oehlert Buchholz TMA Aviation Academy A. Condor Germania Air Berlin Swiss Austrian Condor Etihad Airways Austrian Germania Etihad Airways Lufthansa Air Berlin Ferdinand de Frank Lumnitzer Ja, iCH FLi ege geRn! Dr. Reinhard Heiko Schmidt Correvont Lufthansa Wenn man jüngsten Artikeln in diversen Medien Glauben schenken darf, allen Berufen scheint auch im Piloten-Alltag nicht immer nur die Sonne, Condor Lernbeiss Condor ist der Beruf des Airline-Piloten alles andere als ein Traumjob und eine dennoch vertreten die auf diesen Seiten versammelten Flugzeugführer Austrian Karriere im Cockpit alles andere als erstrebenswert. Natürlich: Wie bei einhellig
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Info August 2018
    Investor Relations Investor Info August 2018 Lufthansa Group Month yoy Cumulative yoy Passengers in 1,000 13,755 +10.0% 94,840 +11.2% Available seat-kilometers (m) 32,925 +8.2% 232,705 +8.0% Revenue seat-kilometers (m) 28,434 +8.7% 189,951 +8.8% Total Lufthansa Group Passenger load-factor (%) 86.4 +0.5pts. 81.6 +0.6pts. Airlines Available Cargo tonne-kilometers (m) 1,416 +3.6% 10,782 +4.2% Revenue Cargo tonne-kilometers (m) 895 -0.7% 7,170 +1.7% Cargo load-factor (%) 63.2 -2.7pts. 66.5 -1.7pts. Number of flights 111,408 +10.0% 813,719 +8.7% Passengers in 1,000 6,509 +7.3% 46,708 +7.3% Available seat-kilometers (m) 18,087 +4.0% 131,537 +4.4% Lufthansa German Airlines* Revenue seat-kilometers (m) 15,571 +4.3% 107,345 +4.3% Passenger load-factor (%) 86.1 +0.3pts. 81.6 -0.1pts. Number of flights 50,832 +8.6% 383,883 +6.7% Passengers in 1,000 4,153 +5.0% 29,075 +5.0% Available seat-kilometers (m) 12,739 +1.1% 92,374 +1.8% thereof Hub FRA Revenue seat-kilometers (m) 10,982 +0.9% 75,672 +1.3% Passenger load-factor (%) 86.2 -0.2% 81.9 -0.4% Number of flights 30,902 +7.9% 226,998 +6.3% Passengers in 1,000 2,256 +11.2% 16,921 +10.9% Available seat-kilometers (m) 5,271 +11.3% 38,657 +11.0% thereof Hub MUC Revenue seat-kilometers (m) 4,538 +13.4% 31,338 +11.9% Passenger load-factor (%) 86.1 +1.6% 81.1 +0.7% Number of flights 18,620 +8.6% 147,417 +6.7% Passengers in 1,000 2,033 +10.6% 13,667 +9.4% Available seat-kilometers (m) 5,555 +9.0% 39,965 +7.7% SWISS Revenue seat-kilometers (m) 4,877 +9.4% 33,148 +9.1% Passenger load-factor (%) 87.8 +0.3pts.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief
    4 | Issue 01/2016 POLICY BRIEF THREE QUESTIONS FOR NEW A4E WORKING GROUP DANIEL WEDER STAKEHOLDER ON ENVIRONMENT CORNER On the occasion of the etc.) and not a pure presentation of the cost-reduction European Commission’s INSIDE approach. Today‘s “European Strategy for A4E technological possibilities, which would clearly Low-Emission Mobility” improve the situation, are not, or only seldom, on 20 July, A4E set used in Air Navigation Services (for instance out its frst priorities in Virtual Centres). on environmental policy: ICAO’s global Question: On June 28, the CEOs of A4E market-based measure and government airlines presented operational, technological support for sustainable low carbon fuels. and political suggestions to limit the impact Daniel Weder became CEO of skyguide, the of controller’s strikes and are now looking A4E calls on all governments to support Swiss air navigation service provider, in 2007. towards ANSPs for support in implementing ICAO’s (International Civil Aviation Orga- them. What’s your position regarding the A4E nisation) proposeD carbon offset scheme Question: What were your initial thoughts Call for Action? to cap emissions from 2020. During the when you frst heard of A4E? Weder: As for skyguide, we do generally review of the EU Emission TraDing Scheme Weder: With A4E we have now a strong agree with the “9 principles“ put forward by (ETS) for aviation later this year, the Euro- customer voice coming up with focussed A4E concerning strikes in Air Traffc Control. pean legislator should ensure the compe- positions and ideas. Solution oriented airlines However, there are two caveats.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE East Meadow, November 7, 2019
    PRESS RELEASE East Meadow, November 7, 2019 Further informations on Lufthansa Group achieves an Adjusted EBIT of EUR 1.3 billion third-quarter results: → https://investor- in the third quarter relations.lufthansagroup. com/en/publications/fina ncial-reports.html − Third-quarter result only slightly below prior-year level, despite economic slowdown and higher fuel costs − Substantially greater unit cost reduction than in the first-half year − Slower growth at Group airlines and their competitors helps counter pricing pressures in Europe − North Atlantic business still buoyant, with third-quarter performance exceeding prior-year − Full-year guidance confirmed In a challenging operating environment, Lufthansa Group achieved an Adjusted EBIT of EUR 1.3 billion for the third quarter of 2019, only slightly below the EUR 1.4 billion of the prior-year period. Against the backdrop of higher fuel costs, which were EUR 171 million above their 2018 level in the third quarter alone, the Group delivered a sound business performance for the period. “Our airlines were able to translate their premium quality and market strength into solid third-quarter earnings,” confirms Carsten Spohr, Chairman of the Executive Board & CEO of Deutsche Lufthansa AG. “At Eurowings the turnaround measures are showing first results; and at Austrian Airlines, Brussels Airlines and Lufthansa Cargo we will be taking tangible corrective action to improve earnings. As Europe’s leading airline group, we are on a sound and stable strategic course.” The third-quarter earnings were supported by continued strong business on North Atlantic routes. Unit costs were also substantially reduced in the third quarter, particularly at the Network Airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk & Reward in Aircraft Backed Finance
    Modeling Aircraft Loan & Lease Portfolios 3rd revision Discussion Notes October 2017 Modeling Aircraft Loans & Leases Discussion notes December 2013 2 PK AirFinance is a sub-business of GE Capital Aviation Services (GECAS). The company provides and arranges debt to airlines and investors secured by commercial aircraft. Cover picture by Serge Michels, Luxembourg. 3 Preface These discussion notes are a further update to notes that I prepared in 2010 and revised in 2013. The issues discussed here are ones that we have pondered over the last 25 years, trying to model aircraft loans and leases quantitatively. In 1993, Jan Melgaard (then at PK) and I worked with Bo Persson in Sweden to develop an analytic model of aircraft loans that we called SAFE. This model evolved into a Monte Carlo simulation tool, Lending EDGE, that was taken into operation at PK in 2012 and validated under ISRS 4400 by Deloitte in 2013. I have now made some corrections and amendments to the previous version, based on helpful feed-back from industry practitioners and academics. I have added a section on Prepayment Risk in loans and expanded on Jurisdiction Risk. My work at PK AirFinance has taught me a lot about risks and rewards in aircraft finance, not least from the deep experience and insight of many valued customers and my co-workers here at PK and at GECAS, our parent company, but the views and opinions expressed herein are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of the General Electric Company or its subsidiaries. In preparing these notes, I have been helped by several people with whom I have had many inspiring discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • European Airlines Exposed As Significant Opponents of EU Climate
    EMBARGOED to 00:01 GMT, June 10th, 2021 European airlines exposed as significant opponents of EU climate policy New documents shed light on systematic anti-climate lobbying campaign amid billions in government bailouts Europe's largest airlines - which collectively received €30 billion in taxpayer support during the COVID-19 pandemic - have emerged as some of the most significant opponents of ambitious climate policy in the region, according to a new report by InfluenceMap. These efforts have continued even though many companies are now being part-owned by governments due to the COVID-19 bailout agreements. InfluenceMap's report is based on nearly 800 evidence pieces as well as dozens of documents obtained by Freedom of Information requests. Taken together, they shed new light on the extent of the aviation sector's anti-climate lobbying targeting the EU and European governments. This is despite the sector publicly declaring its commitment to net-zero emissions for European aviation by 2050. The report details the industry's two-level strategy to avoid effective regulation. The sector is lobbying against EU- level policies - such as the Sustainable Aviation Fuels blending mandate and the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) while also trying to weaken the international carbon offsetting scheme, CORSIA. Amidst all of this, airlines have initiated extensive climate-focused PR campaigns - like those undertaken by the oil & gas sector - to deflect responsibility for the sector’s carbon footprint and to tackle growing ‘flight shame’ among the public. Information revealed in the report includes: • The ongoing industry campaign to weaken the EU ETS with regards to aviation and replace it with the CORSIA offsetting scheme, including direct lobbying by Lufthansa, Air France-KLM, and International Airlines Group (IAG).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015
    Consistently safeguarding the future Annual Report 2015 Lufthansa Group The Lufthansa Group is the world’s leading aviation group. Its portfolio of companies consists of hub airlines, point-to-point airlines and aviation service companies. Its combination of business segments makes the Lufthansa Group a globally unique aviation group whose integrated value chain not only offers financial synergies but also puts it in a superior position over its competitors in terms of know-how. Key figures Lufthansa Group 2015 2014 Change in % Revenue and result Total revenue €m 32,056 30,011 6.8 of which traffic revenue €m 25,322 24,388 3.8 EBIT1) €m 1,676 1,000 67.6 Adjusted EBIT €m 1,817 1,171 55.2 EBITDA1) €m 3,395 2,530 34.2 Net profit / loss €m 1,698 55 2,987.3 Key balance sheet and cash flow statement figures Total assets €m 32,462 30,474 6.5 Equity ratio % 18.0 13.2 4.8 pts Net indebtedness €m 3,347 3,418 – 2.1 Cash flow from operating activities €m 3,393 1,977 71.6 Capital expenditure (gross) €m 2,569 2,777 – 7.5 Key profitability and value creation figures EBIT margin % 5.2 3.3 1.9 pts Adjusted EBIT margin % 5.7 3.9 1.8 pts EBITDA margin 1) % 10.6 8.4 2.2 pts EACC €m 323 – 223 ROCE % 7.7 4.6 3.1 pts Lufthansa share Share price at year-end € 14.57 13.83 5.3 Earnings per share € 3.67 0.12 2,958.3 Proposed dividend per share € 0.50 – Traffic figures 2) Passengers thousands 107,679 105,991 1.6 Freight and mail thousand tonnes 1,864 1,924 – 3.1 Passenger load factor % 80.4 80.1 0.3 pts Cargo load factor % 66.3 69.9 – 3.6 pts Flights number 1,003,660 1,001,961 0.2 Employees Average number of employees number 119,559 118,973 0.5 Employees as of 31.12.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Best Practices for Commercial Operators
    OPERATIONS IN AIRSPACE CLASS E IN GERMANY BELOW FL100 RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATORS The following best practices have been developed by flight safety officers and experts to enhance the safety of operations in airspace Class E below FL100 to prevent collisions between controlled and uncontrolled aircraft in a mixed traffic environment. Recommendations for training departments and pilots • IMPROVE AIRSPACE AWARENESS Train pilots to be aware of shortfalls in the existing airspace structure – annual training and NOT only by bulletin using two components: o Generic briefing on airspace Class E in Germany o Dedicated airport briefing documents o Include risk and threats in unprotected airspace in individual departure and arrival briefing • OPERATING RECOMMENDATIONS o FLY DEFENSIVELY! o Maintain Minimum Clean Airspeed or as slow as reasonable o Request to use protected airspace – minimise time in airspace Class E and refuse shortcuts if necessary. Most standard departures and approaches/transitions will facilitate this. o Descend according to airspace structure on arrival. Steep/expedited climb through airspace Class E on departure. o Consider airspace structure for engine out procedures o Consider delaying take-off if conflict with other aircraft is anticipated • USE OF AUTOMATION IN AIRSPACE CLASS ECHO o Minimise visual approaches – they require additional attention and increase flight time in unprotected airspace o Maximise lookout capacity through use of automation (FMS/task sharing) • SEE AND AVOID o Maximise lookout
    [Show full text]
  • 551 236 33,43% 3 172 095 29,48% 872 040 52,89% 5 927 313 55,09
    Domestic and international scheduled operations - passenger traffic by carriers in the fourth quarter of 2019 and 2020 2020 2019 market market Carrier number passengers share number passengers share LOT Polish Airlines 1 514 194 31,18% 1 3 018 259 28,05% Ryanair 2 490 672 29,76% 2 2 960 873 27,52% Wizz Air 3 351 334 21,31% 3 2 342 228 21,77% KLM Royal Dutch Airlines 4 74 096 4,49% 7 167 647 1,56% Lufthansa 5 62 945 3,82% 4 533 641 4,96% Enter Air 6 36 871 2,24% 8 153 836 1,43% EasyJet 7 12 439 0,75% 5 243 676 2,26% Norwegian Air Shuttle 8 11 388 0,69% 6 201 750 1,88% British Airways 9 11 210 0,68% 12 79 209 0,74% Air France 10 10 186 0,62% 11 84 697 0,79% Belavia 11 10 026 0,61% 30 17 273 0,16% Emirates 12 10 022 0,61% 14 61 242 0,57% SAS 13 9 676 0,59% 9 114 174 1,06% Swiss International Air Lines 14 8 601 0,52% 13 63 360 0,59% Turkish Airlines (THY) 15 8 581 0,52% 26 24 692 0,23% TAP Portugal 16 3 986 0,24% 22 28 676 0,27% Austrian Airlines 17 3 791 0,23% 18 49 944 0,46% Aegean Airlines 18 3 107 0,19% 24 25 665 0,24% Eurowings (Germanwings) 19 2 675 0,16% 21 44 874 0,42% Finnair 20 2 621 0,16% 15 58 297 0,54% Transavia Airlines 21 2 493 0,15% 23 27 163 0,25% Air China 22 2 486 0,15% 33 15 270 0,14% SunExpress 23 1 749 0,11% 37 2 471 0,02% Jet2.com 24 929 0,06% 20 46 394 0,43% Qatar Airways 25 922 0,06% 10 86 279 0,80% Other carriers 1 890 0,11% 307 289 2,86% Polish carriers* 551 236 33,43% 3 172 095 29,48% LCC** 872 040 52,89% 5 927 313 55,09% Total passengers 1 648 890 10 758 879 Source: Civil Aviation Authority of Republic of Poland, data obtained from Polish airports, Warsaw, May 2021 *Polish carriers: LOT Polish Airlines, Enter Air, Smartwings (d.
    [Show full text]
  • ICAO State Action Plan on Emissions Reduction - Germany
    ICAO State Action Plan on Emissions Reduction - Germany - Page 1 out of 41 Impressum Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development Directorate General for Civil Aviation Robert-Schuman Platz 1 53175 Bonn Principal Contact Mr. Jan Bode Tel +49 228 99-300-4923 Fax +49 228 99-300-807-4923 E-Mail [email protected] Page 2 out of 41 INTRODUCTION 4 Current state of aviation in the Federal Republic of Germany 6 Structure of the aviation sector and its contribution to CO2 emissions 6 General Transport Data 8 Geographical characteristics 17 SECTION 1- Supra-national actions, including those led by the EU 17 1. Aircraft related Technology Development 17 2. Alternative Fuels 20 3. Improved Air Traffic Management and Infrastructure Use 23 4. Economic / market-based measures 26 5. Support to voluntary actions: ACI Airport Carbon Accreditation 28 SECTION 2- National Measures in Federal Republic of Germany 30 1. Aircraft related Technology Development 30 2. Alternative Fuels 34 3. Improved Air Traffic Management and Infrastructure Use 35 4. Economic / market-based measures 41 5. Support to voluntary actions: ACI Airport Carbon Accreditation 41 Annex 41 Page 3 out of 41 INTRODUCTION a) The Federal Republic of Germany is a Member of European Union and of the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC). ECAC is an intergovernmental organisation covering the widest grouping of Member States1 of any European organisation dealing with civil aviation. It is currently composed of 44 Member States, and was created in 1955. b) The ECAC States share the view that environmental concerns represent a potential constraint on the future development of the international aviation sector, and together they fully support ICAO’s ongoing efforts to address the full range of these concerns, including the key strategic challenge posed by climate change, for the sustainable development of international air transport.
    [Show full text]
  • The Restructuring of Berlin's Airport System and the City's Position In
    Missed Opportunities: The Restructuring of Berlin’s Airport System and the City’s Position in International Airline Networks Authors: Heike C. Alberts Department of Geography and Urban Planning University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh 800 Algoma Boulevard Oshkosh, WI 54901 Tel: (920) 424 7109 Fax: (920) 424 0292 Email: [email protected] John T. Bowen, Jr. Department of Geography and Urban Planning University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh 800 Algoma Boulevard Oshkosh, WI 54901 Tel: (920) 424 4103 Email: [email protected] Julie L. Cidell Department of Geography and Environmental Studies California State University San Bernadino 5500 University Parkway, SB 327 San Bernadino, CA 92407 Tel: (909) 538 3777 [email protected] 1 Missed Opportunities: The Restructuring of Berlin’s Airport System and the City’s Position in International Airline Networks Abstract After its history as a divided city, Berlin was expected to become a major world city following reunification. While the city has grown in terms of investment and social capital, it has not attained the preeminent status on the global stage that was expected. One important reason for this is that Berlin remains no more than a secondary hub in the global airline industry. In this article, we measure the city’s importance in airline networks at four points from 1989 to 2006. We then explain the city’s stature in those networks today as a product of both larger forces in the airline industry and circumstances more specific to Berlin. The former include liberalization and the development of airline alliances. In Berlin, meanwhile, the fractured airport system, which the city inherited from the Cold War, has been an obstacle to Berlin’s aspirations for centrality in the airline industry.
    [Show full text]