Reproductive Health Laws Around the World

PROGRAM ON THE GLOBAL DEMOGRAPHY OF AGING

Working Paper Series

Jocelyn E. Finlay, David Canning, June Y. T. Po

October 2012

PGDA Working Paper No. 96 http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/pgda/working.htm

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Harvard Initiative for Global Health. The Program on the Global Demography of Aging receives funding from the National Institute on Aging, Grant No. 1 P30 AG024409-06.

Title

Reproductive Health Laws Around the World iii

Author, Degrees and Affiliation

Jocelyn E. Finlay, PhD, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, USA

David Canning, PhD, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public

Health, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, USA

June Y. T. Po, MSc, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public

Health, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, USA

Corresponding Author

Jocelyn E. Finlay, Research Scientist, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies,

9 Bow St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Tel: 617-372-735; Email: [email protected]

Running head

Reproductive Health Laws

ABSTRACT

We develop an index of reproductive health laws around the world. Laws regarding abortion, contraceptive pill, condom, intrauterine device, and sterilization are detailed for 186 countries from 1960 through to 2009. Using qualitative information dating from the 1960s, we code information on reproductive health laws around the world into panel data. In this paper we summarize the indexation of the laws, detailing the sources and methodologies we used to create the index. We show changes in the laws over time, and compare laws across countries. In addition, we demonstrate the potential use of the panel data by exploring the differential liberalization of reproductive health laws across country-level socioeconomic factors. We show that countries with more liberal abortion laws associated with higher income per capita, higher levels of female education, and lower fertility rates.

INTRODUCTION

During the 1960s and 1970s there were extensive efforts to catalogue the legal standing of abortion, contraceptive pill, condom, intrauterine device (IUD), and sterilization around the world. With the explosion of population growth rates and the emergence of modern contraceptive technologies, the legality of abortion and contraceptive methods became an important item on the reproductive health agenda. Studies of reproductive health laws across countries and over time were of high interest throughout the 1970s [1,2,3,4]. Population policies and the agendas of the Population Council and International Planned Parenthood Federation relied on understanding the laws surrounding contraception to enable implementation of their various programs.

However, with the emergence of HIV/AIDS in the 1980s, HIV/AIDS related research took precedent in the new reproductive health agenda and placed critical examination of laws surrounding abortion and contraception by the way-side.

In this study, we revisit the cataloguing of the reproductive health laws around the world.

Reproductive health laws vary widely around the world [5]. Over the past 50 years, some countries, for example Argentina and Ghana, have changed considerably in their reproductive health laws. In other countries such as Bangladesh, Ireland, Kenya and Senegal, their abortion- related laws have remained unchanged. Some former colonies remain conservative in their laws while the colonial power liberalized laws. For example, Senegal remained strict in its abortion laws after gaining independence from France in 1960, allowing it only on the grounds of saving a mother’s life, whereas France legalized abortion upon request in 1975. Religious majority has some influence over the laws, such as in Egypt, where 82% of population reported being

Muslim, but not always as one might expect, as it has over 75% liberalization in its pill and condom-related laws and 14% liberalization in its abortion laws.

The database of reproductive health laws presented in this study is based on a range of qualitative and quantitative sources to construct a global panel of indicators detailing the laws on abortion, contraceptive pill, condom, IUD, and sterilization from 1960 to 2009. This database can contribute to our understanding of the role legal changes had on fertility changes since 1960.

Understanding the legal environment on women’s rights to reproductive health after the

International Conference on Population Development in Cairo 1994, when many countries brought forward new population and family planning policies may explain different policy implementation across countries at the time.

Furthermore, understanding the role of legal changes play in access to reproductive health services is an integral step in helping women and couples achieve their desired family size and control their timing and spacing of births. Moreover, enabling safe, effective and legal access to contraception and abortion will help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and rate of maternal mortality and morbidity from unsafe abortions.

In the reproductive health and demography literature much has been written on the effects of reproductive health policy on fertility outcomes. [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Fierce debate surrounded the magnitude of the contribution [7,16,17,18] reproductive health policy, access and use have in shaping fertility decline. Pritchett argued that family planning programs on fertility is largely ineffective, whereas Bongaarts submitted that because programs tend to be strongest in countries with low wanted fertility, the net effect is offsetting and unwanted fertility did not decrease on average[7].

A recent example comparable to our efforts to index the reproductive health laws around world, is the work by Ross and Stover [19,20] who have constructed a Family Planning Effort Score. To create this score, the authors interview key informants in 82 developing countries using a 125- item questionnaire. The questions fall into four main categories: policy and stage setting activities; service and service related activities; evaluation and record keeping; and methods of

5 accessibility and availability. We view our approach as complementary to Ross and Stover’s

[19], and each provides unique and valuable information for population health policy makers.

Our approach is to rely on written text and documented information rather than key informants as Ross and Stover [19] did. We also restrict our index to itemize the reproductive health laws rather than the broad array of categories condensed into the Family Planning Effort Scores. We built a panel dating from 1960 to 2009, rather than the snapshots at intermittent years from 1972 through to the present, repeating their survey over the years 1972, 1982, 1989, 1994, 1999 with the most recent survey in 2004 [20].

In this paper we detail the methods we use to compile the reproductive health law index, and discuss the sources for the data. We explain how we construct the index of reproductive health laws using these data sources. We then provide some analysis of the index showing how the laws vary across country, according to religion, geographic region and colonial origin, and within countries, according to mean years of schooling, income per capita, and fertility rates. We then provide some country specific examples of how the legal changes came about and the subsequent observations on fertility. We aim to fill part of the gap by cataloguing the actual laws on such a scale across time and countries, and across methods, which has remained neglected since the

1980s.

METHODS

Data Sources

To chart the changes in reproductive health laws, we restrict our sources to what we consider seminal catalogues of reproductive health laws around the world. Data for the abortion law index is generated from information summarized by the United Nations Population Division (2002).

The data for the contraceptive laws is based on the Law and Population Monograph Series 8 and

17 prepared by Stepan and Kellogg [3] and subsequent publications from Tufts University 6

Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy’s Law and Population Program [3] and the Annual

Review of Population Law [1]. Data for the voluntary sterilization laws comes from publications by Stepan and Kellogg [1], Ross, Hong and Huber [5] and Boland [21].

Abortion Policies: A Global Review (2002)

United Nations Population Division released a report in 2002 on Abortion Policies: A Global

Review[22], which presented country profiles of national laws and policies concerning induced abortion and the context within which abortion took place at the end of the 20th century. The profiles included developed and developing countries as of December 31, 1999. The report based its source on the Population Policy Data Bank maintained by the Population Division. The country profiles catalogued abortion policies on seven grounds on which abortion was permitted.

These included: “To save the life of the woman”, “To preserve physical health”, “To preserve mental health”, “Rape or incest”, “Fetal impairment”, “Economic or social reasons” and

“Available on request”. It noted additional requirements such as report of psychological and social problems by the woman, counseling before abortion is performed, and whether abortion must be performed by a physician in a public or private health institution. More importantly, the profile provided a descriptive summary of the history of abortion policy development from 1960 to the present. For example, in 1989 the Albanian government expanded the grounds for legal abortion to include cases of rape or incest and in 1991, up to 30 medical indications. With such information, we were able to quantitatively input the exact years of legal changes in the panel data set. The laws are assumed to remain the same in subsequent years until further information indicates otherwise.

Law and Population Monograph Series 8 and 17 (1974)

Another major source of information was the Law and Population Monograph Series 8 and 17 prepared by Stepan and Kellogg[3]. The series were a thorough and systematic compilation of laws on voluntary sterilization and contraception from legal texts of more than 60 countries. It

7 provided country specific examples of jurisdictions which specifically authorize or prohibit voluntary sterilization, with non-restrictive or restrictive character from civil law countries, common law countries, and socialist states of Eastern Europe. Second part of the monograph tabulated details within each country under four main categories: “no provisions on voluntary sterilization (therefore permitted)”, “specific provisions”, “criminal law applicable to voluntary sterilization” such as citation to penal codes, “Moslem religious law”.

The 17th monograph dealt with laws on contraceptive methods specifically on contraceptive pill, condom, and IUD. In the country profiles, it provided qualitative descriptions on “imports and manufacture”, on “condoms”, on “pills”, on “IUD”, and on “commercial advertising”, “publicity for family planning”, “government policy”, and “miscellaneous”. It provided exact years where laws were enacted or repealed regarding manufacture, importation and sale of contraceptives and regarding insertion of IUD by medical professional, which are captured in the panel data.

The following sources based most of their information and structure on Stepan and Kellogg’s work and expanded it to more countries and later years.

Survey of Contraceptive Laws: Country Profiles (1976)

The UNFPA Survey of Contraceptive Laws: Country Profiles, checklists and summaries [23] was published after widespread interest at the 1975 meeting of International Contraceptive Study

Project. The data include information up to March 1976.The report covered contraceptive laws of 140 countries, expanded from 60 countries in the monographs by Stepan and Kellogg. It also contained a similar tabulation as Stepan and Kellogg on the level of restrictions under each category.

The Legal Handbook on Contraception, Voluntary Sterilization and Abortion (1976)

Another source built from Stepan and Kellog monographs was The Legal Handbook on

Contraception, Voluntary Sterilization and Abortion [23], prepared by the Law and Population

Programme at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University. The material in the 8

Handbook provided cross-sectional data up to November 1975. It provided information on laws on contraception, voluntary sterilization and abortion of 135 countries.

Under contraception, it describes qualitatively: government policies that provide favorable or unfavorable conditions such as sponsoring or forbidding family planning programs; importation of contraceptives for the purpose of contraception or as prophylactics; manufacturing of contraceptives; sale of condoms; sale of contraceptive pills, which had information on location of sales such as at vending machines or at registered pharmacies and other requirements such as prescription; information on IUD; contraceptive advertisement; transportation of contraceptives.

Under voluntary sterilization, it provided information where available, on specific legislation or regulations and applicable criminal law from penal code.

Under abortion, it provided legality under the penal code. If legal, then there was description of abortion permitted under following conditions: medical, eugenic, humanitarian, socioeconomic and elective. In addition, descriptions of terms of imprisonment or fines were provided when penal code was violated.

The second part of the Handbook contains a checklist that provides, in detail, the status of legality on the categories mentioned above as “prohibited”, “restricted” or “no restriction”, with additional categories such as “authorization required”, “location of sale”, “prescription required” where appropriate. The cross-sectional data from the Handbook provided a start date in the panel dataset where these categories were legally permitted for abortion, contraceptive pills, condom,

IUD, sterilization. The policy is assumed to remain in the same legal status in subsequent years in the panel dataset until further information available indicated otherwise.

Voluntary Sterilization: An International Fact Book (1985)

Ross, Hong and Huber assembled the Voluntary Sterilization: An International Fact Book in

1985[24] with the purpose of encouraging governments and non-governmental organizations to include or extend quality voluntary sterilization services in their health programs. In its chapter 9 on Laws and Regulations, the handbook described the principal bodies of law as Islamic Law, the English Criminal Law, the Indian Penal Code of 1860, and the French Penal Code. The factbook contained a table of legal status of voluntary sterilization for 37 selected countries with the years of known important changes given. It had detailed information of requirements for sterilization such as consent by someone other than acceptor, minimum age for women, minimum number and sex of children, among other specifications.

Annual Review of Population Law (1974 - )

Lastly, a major source for the panel data was the Annual Review of Population Law edited by

Reed Boland and produced jointly by the Harvard Law School, the United Nations Population

Fund, and more recently, under the auspice of the Harvard School of Public Health. In addition,

Boland wrote summaries on sterilization laws in a chapter of Contraceptive Sterilization: Global

Issues and Trends in 2002 updating the Stepan publication on sterilization. They contained summaries and excerpts of legislation, constitutions, court decisions and other official government documents from every country in the world on population policies, reproductive rights, reproductive health and other related topics. The period covered by the database is from

1974 to present. The review captures the laws and conditions on abortion, with the dates which the laws were enacted, in its official languages or in English if available. It lists by country, a subject line describing the content of the law and summary of the content of the law, for example, “information to public on contraception”, “A law passed 7 May 1975 reads: the

Minister of the Interior shall ensure that the public receives information on contraceptive methods” and reference “Law No. 177 of 7 May 1975 (Lovitdende A, p. 575), Section (11),

Subd. (4), reported in 27 IDHL, No.1 (1976), p.111.”Each report describes a provision or law enacted at a specific date, providing detailed descriptions and references of changes..

Data Code Description

In Table 1 we summarize how the laws were coded. Not all categories of the reproductive health laws can be defined as illegal/legal and shades of legality are taken into account and explained below in detail. We construct a country-year panel for 186 countries from 1960 to 2009.

Abortion Laws

To construct the abortion law index we classify seven legal grounds for legal abortion based on

UNDP’s system: “to save the life of the woman”; “to preserve her physical health”; “to preserve her mental health”; “consequent on rape or incest”; “fetal impairment”; “economic or social reasons”; and “available on request”. When an abortion is legal upon request, we assume it is legal for the other reasons if this is not explicitly stated.

These broad categories are not comprehensive descriptions of abortion law. Often legal grounds for abortions depend on the duration of gestation. In some countries more than one doctor’s adjudication or a husband's consent is required. In federal systems, abortion laws sometimes differ across regions within a country. In this case the law that covers the majority of the population, if one exists, is used to classify at the national level.

In many countries there is a divergence between law and practice, with abortions being widely available despite being technically illegal, or vice versa. We code according to the law in place rather than its enforcement or the practical availability of abortion.

Contraceptive Pill, Condom, and IUD Laws

Legal data on contraceptive pill is sourced from the Law and Population Monograph Series [3] published by the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

One of the key distinctions made in the legal data is the availability of the pill as a contraceptive versus a prophylactic. Thus information from other sources may indicate that contraception is available, it may be that it is just available as a prophylactic and not as a contraceptive. Similar to

11 our abortion index, we take information from the laws de jure, rather than considering actual access and use, and thus there may be disparities between use and the law.

To identify variation in the laws across time and across countries, different categories of legality for the pill, were applied: sale purpose, sale location, prescription requirement, subsidy, commercial advertising. This is summarized in Table 1 with the ordered values increasing to reflect increasing liberalization.

Voluntary Sterilization

Information regarding the voluntary sterilization laws are taken from two principal sources

[21,24]. The coding is multinomial across four ordered categories (Table 1) In many developing countries, the legal status of voluntary sterilization is unclear. In this case, we consider that sterilization will be available, since it is not illegal, but it will not be promoted and thus ranks lower than the case when it is legal for contraceptive purposes.

In Table 2 we summarize the indexed laws showing the values in 1960 and 2000. The entire panel is annual from 1960 to 2009 available on request. But we only show the two years here for illustrative purposes (and a ten year panel printed in the appendix).

Figure 1 summarizes the existing database. It shows the global average trend of the percentage of the maximum possible liberalization from 1960 to 2009.

Reproductive Health Laws Across Socioeconomic Factors

To demonstrate the applications of the reproductive health law database, we added socioeconomic factors from various sources to explore the associations and trends of reproductive health laws by income per capita, fertility rate, education, religion, colonial origin and region.

Income per capita data is sourced from the Penn World tables version 7.0 [19] using the natural log of trade adjusted income per capita in 2005 International Dollar as a continuous variable.

Fertility rates are taken from World Development Indicators [25], where average fertility rate of each country by year is available as a continuous variable.

The data on mean years of schooling is taken from the Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) World Population Program

[26]. The data is available by country every five years. We interpolated the educational variables, constructing average data points within the range of the five year data.

The Quality of Government (QoG) Dataset hosted by the University of Gothenburg [27] provides data on religion[28,29,30].The QoG time-series data version provided four continuous variables on the percentage of population in 1980 that identified as “Catholic”, “Muslim”,

“Protestant” and “Other religions”.

Colonial origin of countries, also from the QoG Dataset [27,31], were categorized into “Britain”,

“France”, “Spain”, “USSR”, “Others” and “Never colonized by a western oversea or USSR”.

Countries that were coded with “USSR” as colonial origin in actuality were countries under

Soviet occupation, which included Commonwealth of Independent States, Soviet satellite states, countries annexed to Soviet Union and countries occupied by the Red Army, including Romania and North Korea.Countries in the “Others” category are countries with more than one colonizers in history. There are countries that were partially ruled by multiple colonizers at the same time, such as Cameroon governed by France and United Kingdom from 1919 to 1960-1961 or sequentially, such as the Philippines under Spanish rule from 1565 to 1898 and briefly under

American rule. There are countries that gained independence or reunited from separate states between 1960 to present, that have data only since their independence. Data from the years prior to independence are taken from data of the colonizing countries such that a complete panel data is created. For example, Slovenia was found in 1991. Data prior to 1991 was taken from 1960-

1991 Yugoslavia data. Similarly, this treatment is repeated for other Yugoslavia predecessor

13 countries, USSR predecessor countries before 1991, Ethiopia before 1993 and Germany 1960-

1990.

Regions are categorized as “Africa”, “East Asia/Pacific”, “Latin America/Caribbean”, “OECD-

Europe” and “Middle East/North Africa”

These socioeconomic variables were combined with the reproductive health laws data by country and by year.

Statistical Analysis

The associations between the liberalization of reproductive health laws and socioeconomic factors were analyzed using ordinary least square regressions with indicator variables created for colonial origin, and geographical region. Where continuous variables were available, we included a one year lag in the regression models. We further accounted for year fixed effects and country fixed effects where appropriate. Figures of trends by reproductive health laws were created by pooling all countries, taking the mean liberalization score by socioeconomic factors of interest and plotting it by year on the x-axis and percent of maximum liberalization score on the y-axis.

RESULTS

Applications of the Reproductive Health Laws Database

We explored the average global trends from 1960 to 2009 with percent liberalization of laws on abortion and four contraceptive methods: contraceptive pill, condom, IUD, voluntary sterilization, separately by income per capita, total fertility rate, education, religion, colonial origin and region. In Figure 1, we see that abortion and contraceptive-related laws were liberalizing on average over time. In Figure 2 we see that High Income countries liberalized abortion laws at a faster rate than countries in lower income groups. This is not the case for Pill,

Condom, IUD and Sterilization, however, where each income group tends to liberalize over time relatively equally. Education seems to have little effect on differing trends over time and the association stems from existing patterns in the 1970s. USSR countries had very liberal abortion laws.

In Tables 3,4 we show the association between the reproductive health law index and income per capita, total fertility rate, education, religion, colonial origin and region. We find that one unit increase in the log of income per capita of a previous year is associated with 14.4 % increase in the abortion law liberalization index. This percentage increase is attenuated after accounting for the general increasing trend in our year fixed effects to 13.7% but loses its association after including year and country fixed effects. This implies that the relationship between GDP per capita and the abortion law is positive and significant across countries, but not within countries.

Thus countries that increase their income per capita over the sample period (1960-2009) do not see a corresponding liberalization of their abortion laws. However, if we compare poor countries with rich countries, we find that rich countries tend to have more liberal abortion laws.

This cross country correlation between income per capita and reproductive health laws also holds for IUD and sterilization to a lesser magnitude: For both IUD and sterilization, richer countries 15 have more liberal laws (see columns (11) and (14) of Table 3). In the case of the pill (column

(5)) and condom (column (8)) there is a small, but significant, negative association between income per capita and laws for these contraceptive methods. This implies that poorer countries have more liberal laws, which may be a reflection of family planning campaigns in poor countries that focus on these methods of contraception.

In Table 3, we show the within, and across, country relationship between fertility and the degree of liberalization of the reproductive health laws. More liberal pill (column (6)), condom (column

(9)), and sterilization (column (15)) laws are associated with lower fertility within countries-- so within a country, as laws liberalize fertility declines. For abortion laws, we see that countries that have more liberal laws have lower fertility (column (2)), but there is no significant association within country relationship between fertility and abortion laws liberalization. For condom

(column (8)), IUD (column (11)) and sterilization (column (14)), we see a small cross-country negative relationship between the liberalization of these laws and fertility.

We also examine the relationship between a country’s average level of education attainment and the degree of liberalization of the laws (Table 3). Countries with higher mean years of schooling have more liberal abortion laws (column 2). We also see a small positive association between education and IUD (column (11)) and sterilization (column (14)) across countries. There is no significant within-country association between abortion laws and education (column (3)), nor with pill laws and education (column (6)).

There is much discussion about reproductive health laws along religious lines. Thus, in Table 4 we present the association between a country’s religion composition and the degree of liberalization of the laws. The four religion variables are the percent of population identifying as

Catholics, Muslims, Protestants or belong to Other religions within a country, and is thus a continuous variable. For example, Ghana in 1980 had 18.7% of the population reporting themselves as Catholics, 15.7% as Muslims, 25.8% as Protestants, and 39.8% as other religions.

The reference category is other religions. A percent increase in Catholic or Muslim population in countries is associated with slightly stricter abortion laws on average, but the magnitude of the effect is very small (column (2)). It should be noted that while the sign of the coefficient indicates slight decrease in liberalization with increase in Catholic and Muslim population within countries, the magnitude of the difference very small.

In Table 4 we consider the variation in laws by colonial origin. Many countries that gained independence in the 1960s maintained the laws of Britain or France at that time. Since the time of independence, British and French laws have liberalized significantly, but former colonies have more often than not maintained the laws of the 1960s, or liberalized to a lesser extent. Thus the starting point matters significantly for what countries experience today. Of note, those countries that have British colonial origin have more liberal laws than those under French influence. The abortion law for example (column (2)) is on average 46% of the maximum possible degree of liberalization in countries with British colonial origin, whereas it is only 27% of the maximum possible degree of liberalization in countries with French colonial origin. The disparity is consistent across pill, condom, IUD and sterilization laws.

In Table 4 we show differences in the laws by region. African and Latin American countries

(column (2)) have relatively strict laws, whereas CIS/Central Asia have very liberal abortion laws. The CIS have relatively strict contraceptive pill laws, legacy of their 1976-1982 ban on oral contraceptives.

Country Case Studies

Bolivia

Long noted for its lack of public support for utilization of contraception and pronatalist population policy, Bolivia has historically experienced constraints in the availability and quality of reproductive and sexual health services [32]. In 1960, the country’s TFR was at 6.7 children. 17

By 1985 it had decreased to 5.13 and by 2008 to 3.46[25]. Despite the traditional view of population growth as being essential to national strength, there was frequent policy liberalization in the early seventies. In 1973 abortion became legal in Bolivia to save the woman’s life, to preserve her health and in the event of rape or incest [22].

Due to alarmingly high maternal and infant mortality [33], in 1974 the Government of Bolivia began a national program of free family planning services at fifteen public care clinics.

PROFAM, Bolivia’s first nationwide family planning organization was formed in 1974 as well

[34]. The policy was soon to be changed, however, when census population figures in 1976 indicated the population was million short of projections. This shortfall in population numbers precipitated a government decree in 1977 which prohibited the provision of family planning services in public institutions.

The reason for the 1974 change came back to haunt Bolivia and by 1982 the Government were so concerned about the levels of unsafe abortion and maternal mortality that the decree was reversed [22]. The new regulations permitted the dissemination of family planning information as part of a post-partum program, and in 1986 the government issued the Integral Women’s

Health Program to provide services and information to high risk women as well [22]. Though many of the country’s physicians are Roman Catholic there is evidence that doctors are not opposed to using voluntary sterilization as a form of fertility regulation. This may reflect the increasing acceptance of contraceptive methods in the country [35].

Bolivia’s indigenous population has traditionally experienced higher rates of fertility than the non-indigenous which has been found to be almost entirely the result of unwanted fertility rather than a desire for larger family size. Though the definition ‘Indigenous’ varies, approximately half the population of Bolivia qualifies such as those identifying as ‘Quechua’, ‘Aymara’, or

‘Guaraní’. The indigenous population’s social marginalization, lower educational attainment and economic conditions seem to make practicing contraception to limit fertility a challenge [36].

With its maternal and child health program strategy, articulated in the 1989 National Plan for

Child Survival and Development and Maternal Health, the government promoted services for reproductive health at that time. The Bolivian government’s pronatalist stance continued to weaken through 1990 with the establishment of the National Reproductive Health Programme.

The intention was to make reproductive health services available to all which were advertised widely in the mid-nineties [37]. However, maternal mortality remains high in the country, at 236 deaths per 100,000 live births according to the 2008 Demographic and Health Survey [38].

Eastern and Central European Countries

Abortion is the primary method of limiting and spacing births in the 27 countries of the region of

East-Central Europe and the former Soviet Union [39]. There is a long history of abortion and reproductive health policy liberalization in the region. The Soviet Decree of 27 June 1936 prohibited the performance of abortions except in cases of danger to life, physical and mental health, or the existence of a serious inheritable disease for the newborn [22]. In 23 November

1955, the Government of the former Soviet Union repealed the general prohibition and specified that abortion could be performed freely during the first twelve weeks of pregnancy; beyond twelve weeks gestation, abortion can be requested if continuation of the pregnancy and the birth would harm the mother [22].

In 1974, the Soviet government even effectively banned the widespread use of oral contraceptives in part due to a pronatalist approach to childbearing, which Albania, Bulgaria and

Romania adopted later as well [41]. Restricted access to contraceptives resulted in a reliance on abortion as the primary method of family planning. Subsequently, there was a dramatic increase in rates of unsafe abortions occurring beyond the twelve weeks of pregnancy. Addressing the concerns of increased morbidity from unsafe abortions, the Soviet government in 1982 issued a

Decree allowing abortions for health reasons to be performed from twelve weeks through to the twenty-eight week of pregnancy [22]. In the same direction, the government expanded the

19 grounds under which legal abortions were available to a broad range of non-medical indications for abortions to be performed on request through the twenty-eighth week of pregnancy. These included the death of the husband during pregnancy, imprisonment of the pregnant woman or husband, deprivation of maternity rights, multiparity.

Overall, poor quality and sporadic supplies of condoms and IUDs, limited options of oral contraceptives and legal restriction of contraceptive sterilization, led to low prevalence in contraceptive use [42]. IUDs were only available in urban areas and was never used by more than 10% of women. Lack of availability, high cost and requirement for insertion assistance put

IUDs beyond reach of most women. For example, in Russia, a package of spermicide or oral contraceptive pills could cost two-third the minimum monthly salary [5]. There were two condom factories in Russia, which reportedly ceased production in 1992 because they could no longer afford to import latex. The only factory manufacturing IUDs was closed down because of complaints concerning the quality of its products [22].

Most Eastern European countries that were not part of the former Soviet Union had fundamental changes to their laws governing abortion between 1980-1997. In 1987, Czech and Slovak republics liberalized the abortion policy to available on request without reason. Similarly,

Hungary liberalized the abortion law in 1993 to available on request. In 1990 and 1991, Albania,

Bulgaria and Romania abandoned strong pronatalist policies, coinciding with the dissolution of

Soviet Union. On the contrary, Poland significantly tightened abortion policy after the dissolution of Soviet Union. Strong influence of the Catholic Church led to strict regulations in

1993, which allowed abortion only in limited circumstances [41]. In the 1990s after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the combination of declining population and low birth rates and high maternal mortality rates fueled pronatalistic policies to reemerge. Croatia, Poland, Russia,

Hungary and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia had nationalist political parties which fostered restrictive reproductive health policies [39].

Besides low access to contraceptives, other factors included reliance upon traditional methods that has a high failure rate. Countries such as Armenia, Azerbaijan and Romania with the greatest reliance on traditional methods were those with highest abortion rates as well, while those such as Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan predominantly used modern methods showed lower abortion rates [40]. From 1992 to 1997, Moldova increased its prevalence of modern contraception by 41% while abortion rate decreased by 50%. On the other hand, Turkmenistan’s increase in abortion rates coincided with an increase in modern contraceptive prevalence.

Ghana

Between 1960 and 2008, Ghana experienced two major reforms in their reproductive health laws. Prior to 1985, laws associated with abortion, pill, condom, IUD and sterilization were relatively strict [2,22]. Abortion was illegal, even in the case when the pregnancy was life threatening to the mother. The pill, requiring a prescription, and condom were available at pharmacies for contraceptive purposes.. There was no subsidies and advertising was strictly prohibited. IUD can only be installed by a physician. There were no laws associated with sterilization.

In 1985, the Criminal Code was amended and abortion was legalized for the following reasons[22]: to save the life of the mother, the physical health of the mother, mental health of the mother, fetal impairment, or rape. Abortion was not available on the grounds of economic hardship nor on request. In the same year, sterilization became legal[3,21,24]. There have been no further changes to the abortion or sterilization laws since these changes in 1985.

In 1994 the National Population Policy was released, and this had legal implications for the pill and condom – both could now be legally advertised, albeit with restrictions. The policy included changes that permitted “the provision of information to allow couples to space or limit their reproduction;” and “sex and family planning education”. A social marketing campaign called

Life Choices was also launched with the support of the government to promote various family

21 planning options [4]. Since 1994 there have been no further changes to the reproductive health laws in Ghana [1].

Subsequent to the liberalization of the abortion law in 1985, fertility declined steeply and discontinuously compared with prior trends and continued to decline subsequent to 1994. In

1985, Ghana as well as most of sub-Saharan Africa experienced a severe drought. Food supplies were short, as surrounding countries were also equally affected. The suffering of families not being able to feed their large families may have brought to bear on the decision of General

Rollings to liberalize the abortion law. It is unclear if the liberalization of the abortion law was a reaction to the drought for it was not accompanied by any advertising campaign of the change, and to this day very few women know of the legal status of abortion (Ghana Maternal Health

Survey 2007).

Following the change in the law, we see that fertility rates steadily decline through to the present instead of exhibiting an abrupt decline similar to 1985. The change in the law did not cause a abrupt drop in the fertility rate but rather we see a gradual change. This may be a cohort effect we see in place. Women make decision over their desired family size at the start of their fertility lives. Shocks that come along during their fertile lives do not change their desired family size.

The change in abortion laws as a shock affects the choices of new cohorts entering their fertile lives. Thus we see a gradual change as an increasing number of cohorts enter under the new regime.

Summary

The reproductive health law panel dataset provides a systematic approach to understand the effect of legal changes on population policies, family planning programs, abortion and contraceptive availability and access across countries and across time. It is based on a broad selection of academic, policy, and contemporary resources. As we alluded to in the country case studies from Latin America, Africa and Central and Eastern Europe, it creates a framework for

22 incorporating rich historical context. We demonstrated associations and trends observed across countries and across time using the aggregate liberalization scores for abortion laws, which would have been difficult to compare without the standardized, systematic collation of the laws from each country and year. Furthermore, the panel dataset prepares the stage for investigating policy implications around reproductive health laws, fertility rates and population dynamics such as their effects on female labor force participation. From a policy perspective, it is important to understand the current laws to make effective policies for women and couples.

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. We thank Laura Khan for her invaluable research assistance on this project.

Table 1: Summary of Reproductive Health Law Indexation

Index Value 0 1 2 3 Abortion Life threatening illegal legal Physical Health illegal legal Mental health illegal legal Rape illegal legal Fetal impairment illegal legal Economic illegal legal Request illegal legal

Contraceptive Pill Sale purpose illegal non-contraceptive contraceptive Sale location illegal pharmacy shop prescription not Prescription requirement illegal prescription required required commercially Subsidy illegal available subsidized free legal via RH education programs, or advertising only to doctors and legal without Commercial adversing illegal pharmacies legal with restrictions restrictions

Condom Sale purpose illegal non-contraceptive contraceptive commercially Subsidy illegal available subsidized free legal via RH education programs, or advertising only to doctors and legal without Commercial advertising illegal pharmacies legal with restrictions restrictions

IUD Legal illegal legal

Doctor installs illegal doctor only inserts doctor or other inserts

Sterilization permitted for therapeutic, eugenic, permitted for medical or health contraceptive Legal illegal reasons only legal status unclear purposes

Table 2: Summary of Indexation of Reproductive Health Laws. 1960 and 2000. Percent of maximum possible liberalization. (Annul data set available to reviewers on request)

Fraction of Complete Liberalization 1960 2000 Contraceptive Sterilization Contraceptive Sterilization Abortion Law Condom Law IUD Law Abortion Law Condom Law IUD Law Pill Law Law Pill Law Law

Afghanistan 66.67 14.29 83.33 75.00 100.00 66.67 Albania 28.57 66.67 100.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 66.67 Algeria 28.57 66.67 42.86 66.67 75.00 100.00 33.33 Andorra 14.29 100.00 Angola 14.29 14.29 83.33 75.00 100.00 66.67 Antigua and Barbuda 14.29 58.33 62.50 100.00 14.29 58.33 62.50 100.00 Argentina 0.00 41.67 62.50 66.67 66.67 57.14 66.67 75.00 66.67 66.67 Armenia 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 Australia 28.57 41.67 37.50 66.67 66.67 100.00 50.00 50.00 66.67 100.00 Austria 0.00 58.33 50.00 0.00 66.67 100.00 66.67 62.50 66.67 100.00 Azerbaijan 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 Bahamas, The 42.86 58.33 37.50 0.00 66.67 42.86 83.33 75.00 100.00 100.00 Bahrain 14.29 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 100.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 33.33 Bangladesh 14.29 58.33 62.50 100.00 66.67 14.29 66.67 75.00 100.00 100.00 Barbados 42.86 50.00 50.00 100.00 66.67 85.71 58.33 62.50 100.00 100.00 Belarus 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 Belgium 14.29 41.67 37.50 66.67 33.33 100.00 66.67 62.50 66.67 33.33 Belize 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 71.43 58.33 62.50 100.00 100.00 Benin 14.29 58.33 25.00 66.67 66.67 14.29 58.33 37.50 66.67 66.67 Bolivia 0.00 50.00 37.50 66.67 66.67 57.14 66.67 75.00 66.67 66.67 Bosnia and Herzegovina 100.00 100.00 41.67 37.50 66.67 Botswana 14.29 66.67 75.00 100.00 66.67 71.43 66.67 75.00 100.00 100.00 Brazil 28.57 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 28.57 50.00 50.00 66.67 100.00 Brunei 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 Bulgaria 100.00 66.67 75.00 100.00 66.67 100.00 66.67 75.00 100.00 100.00 Burkina Faso 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 71.43 66.67 75.00 0.00 66.67 Burundi 14.29 41.67 37.50 0.00 66.67 42.86 50.00 50.00 0.00 66.67 Cambodia 100.00 100.00 Cameroon 57.14 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 57.14 50.00 50.00 0.00 66.67 Canada 14.29 50.00 62.50 100.00 66.67 100.00 66.67 87.50 66.67 100.00 Cape Verde 85.71 58.33 37.50 0.00 66.67 100.00 83.33 75.00 100.00 66.67 Central African Republic 33.33 25.00 0.00 33.33 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 Chad 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 33.33 14.29 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 Chile 14.29 50.00 50.00 100.00 66.67 0.00 58.33 50.00 100.00 100.00 China 100.00 75.00 62.50 100.00 66.67 100.00 91.67 87.50 100.00 100.00 Colombia 14.29 41.67 62.50 66.67 66.67 14.29 50.00 50.00 66.67 100.00 Comoros 0.00 83.33 75.00 100.00 100.00 42.86 83.33 75.00 100.00 100.00 Congo, Rep. 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 14.29 41.67 37.50 0.00 Costa Rica 0.00 58.33 62.50 66.67 66.67 42.86 75.00 87.50 66.67 100.00 Cote d'Ivoire 0.00 41.67 25.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 58.33 75.00 66.67 100.00 Croatia 100.00 41.67 37.50 66.67 66.67 100.00 41.67 37.50 66.67 100.00 Cuba 71.43 66.67 100.00 100.00 Cyprus 42.86 41.67 37.50 66.67 66.67 71.43 41.67 37.50 66.67 100.00 Czech Republic 85.71 66.67 62.50 66.67 66.67 100.00 66.67 62.50 66.67 100.00 Denmark 85.71 50.00 62.50 100.00 66.67 100.00 66.67 62.50 100.00 100.00 Djibouti 0.00 14.29 Dominica 14.29 50.00 50.00 100.00 66.67 14.29 66.67 75.00 100.00 66.67 Dominican Republic 14.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 91.67 87.50 100.00 100.00 Ecuador 0.00 66.67 57.14 83.33 75.00 100.00 100.00 Egypt, Arab Rep. 14.29 14.29 75.00 87.50 66.67 33.33 El Salvador 0.00 66.67 75.00 66.67 66.67 0.00 66.67 75.00 66.67 100.00 Equatorial Guinea 14.29 42.86 Eritrea 42.86 50.00 37.50 66.67 66.67 42.86 58.33 50.00 66.67 66.67 Estonia 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 Ethiopia 42.86 50.00 37.50 66.67 66.67 42.86 66.67 62.50 66.67 66.67 Fiji 14.29 75.00 62.50 66.67 66.67 85.71 75.00 62.50 66.67 100.00 Finland 14.29 66.67 85.71 66.67 75.00 66.67 100.00 France 14.29 41.67 25.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 100.00 Gabon 66.67 14.29 66.67 75.00 66.67 66.67 Gambia, The 42.86 75.00 62.50 100.00 66.67 42.86 91.67 87.50 100.00 66.67 Georgia 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 58.33 62.50 100.00 100.00 Germany 85.71 41.67 25.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 50.00 37.50 66.67 100.00 Ghana 0.00 71.43 50.00 62.50 66.67 100.00 Greece 42.86 75.00 62.50 0.00 33.33 100.00 75.00 62.50 66.67 66.67 Grenada 42.86 42.86 Guatemala 0.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 14.29 75.00 75.00 66.67 100.00 Guinea 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 42.86 41.67 37.50 0.00 66.67 Guinea-Bissau 14.29 41.67 37.50 66.67 66.67 14.29 41.67 37.50 66.67 66.67 Guyana 14.29 50.00 50.00 0.00 66.67 71.43 50.00 50.00 0.00 66.67 Haiti 14.29 58.33 62.50 100.00 66.67 57.14 58.33 62.50 100.00 66.67 Honduras 14.29 66.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 14.29 66.67 37.50 100.00 100.00 Hungary 100.00 66.67 75.00 100.00 66.67 100.00 66.67 75.00 66.67 100.00 Iceland 14.29 50.00 50.00 0.00 66.67 85.71 58.33 62.50 0.00 100.00 India 14.29 50.00 50.00 66.67 66.67 85.71 83.33 75.00 66.67 100.00 Indonesia 0.00 50.00 50.00 66.67 66.67 14.29 66.67 75.00 66.67 100.00 Iran, Islamic Rep. 14.29 58.33 62.50 66.67 66.67 14.29 83.33 100.00 66.67 66.67 Iraq 28.57 50.00 50.00 66.67 66.67 28.57 83.33 50.00 66.67 66.67 Ireland 14.29 33.33 12.50 0.00 66.67 14.29 50.00 50.00 66.67 66.67 Israel 42.86 58.33 50.00 66.67 66.67 71.43 58.33 50.00 66.67 100.00 Italy 14.29 41.67 37.50 66.67 0.00 100.00 66.67 37.50 100.00 100.00 Jamaica 42.86 50.00 62.50 100.00 66.67 42.86 83.33 87.50 100.00 100.00 Japan 85.71 25.00 50.00 0.00 33.33 85.71 41.67 50.00 66.67 33.33 Jordan 0.00 58.33 37.50 100.00 33.33 42.86 66.67 50.00 100.00 66.67 Kazakhstan 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 66.67 Kenya 0.00 50.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 14.29 58.33 75.00 66.67 100.00 Kiribati 14.29 Korea, Dem. Rep. 100.00 100.00 Korea, Rep. 0.00 58.33 62.50 100.00 0.00 57.14 75.00 87.50 66.67 100.00 Kuwait 14.29 57.14

Fraction of Complete Liberalization 1960 2000 Contraceptive Sterilization Contraceptive Sterilization Abortion Law Condom Law IUD Law Abortion Law Condom Law IUD Law Pill Law Law Pill Law Law

Kyrgyz Republic 100.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 100.00 66.67 75.00 100.00 33.33 Lao PDR 0.00 14.29 Lebanon 0.00 41.67 25.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 58.33 50.00 66.67 66.67 Lesotho 0.00 14.29 66.67 62.50 66.67 100.00 Liberia 0.00 41.67 37.50 0.00 66.67 71.43 41.67 37.50 0.00 66.67 Libya 14.29 33.33 25.00 66.67 66.67 14.29 41.67 37.50 66.67 66.67 Liechtenstein 0.00 66.67 42.86 100.00 Lithuania 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 Luxembourg 14.29 58.33 62.50 0.00 66.67 85.71 66.67 50.00 66.67 100.00 Macedonia, FYR 100.00 41.67 37.50 66.67 66.67 100.00 41.67 37.50 66.67 100.00 Madagascar 14.29 33.33 50.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 50.00 50.00 0.00 66.67 Malawi 14.29 66.67 75.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 75.00 87.50 0.00 66.67 Malaysia 14.29 66.67 62.50 66.67 66.67 42.86 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 Maldives 28.57 28.57 Mali 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 66.67 50.00 100.00 66.67 Malta 14.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 0.00 50.00 62.50 0.00 33.33 Marshall Islands 14.29 Mauritania 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 41.67 37.50 0.00 33.33 Mauritius 14.29 83.33 75.00 100.00 66.67 14.29 83.33 75.00 100.00 66.67 Mexico 28.57 58.33 62.50 66.67 66.67 57.14 58.33 62.50 66.67 100.00 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 14.29 Moldova 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 Monaco 0.00 66.67 14.29 Mongolia 14.29 66.67 100.00 100.00 Morocco 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 42.86 75.00 75.00 100.00 66.67 Mozambique 14.29 66.67 42.86 100.00 Myanmar 14.29 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 14.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 Namibia 14.29 41.67 37.50 0.00 100.00 71.43 66.67 50.00 100.00 100.00 Nepal 0.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 100.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 Netherlands 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 100.00 50.00 62.50 66.67 100.00 New Zealand 42.86 50.00 50.00 100.00 0.00 71.43 66.67 50.00 100.00 100.00 Nicaragua 14.29 41.67 37.50 100.00 33.33 14.29 58.33 37.50 100.00 100.00 Niger 14.29 33.33 50.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 58.33 75.00 66.67 100.00 Nigeria 42.86 75.00 62.50 66.67 66.67 42.86 75.00 62.50 66.67 100.00 Norway 42.86 50.00 62.50 100.00 66.67 100.00 50.00 62.50 100.00 100.00 Oman 14.29 14.29 66.67 37.50 66.67 Pakistan 14.29 66.67 75.00 100.00 66.67 42.86 75.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 Palau 14.29 14.29 Panama 14.29 41.67 37.50 66.67 100.00 42.86 50.00 50.00 66.67 100.00 Papua New Guinea 14.29 41.67 62.50 100.00 66.67 42.86 50.00 75.00 100.00 66.67 Paraguay 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 58.33 62.50 100.00 100.00 Peru 14.29 58.33 37.50 66.67 66.67 42.86 66.67 75.00 66.67 100.00 Philippines 14.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 75.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 Poland 85.71 58.33 62.50 66.67 66.67 71.43 66.67 87.50 66.67 66.67 Portugal 14.29 66.67 71.43 66.67 75.00 66.67 100.00 Qatar 0.00 57.14 Romania 100.00 58.33 62.50 100.00 66.67 100.00 58.33 62.50 100.00 100.00 Russian Federation 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 66.67 75.00 100.00 100.00 Rwanda 14.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 42.86 50.00 50.00 100.00 33.33 Samoa 42.86 San Marino 14.29 14.29 Sao Tome and Principe 14.29 14.29 Saudi Arabia 0.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 42.86 33.33 Senegal 14.29 41.67 25.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 58.33 50.00 100.00 66.67 Seychelles 71.43 Sierra Leone 42.86 41.67 50.00 100.00 66.67 42.86 58.33 62.50 100.00 66.67 Singapore 14.29 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 66.67 62.50 66.67 100.00 Slovak Republic 85.71 66.67 62.50 66.67 66.67 100.00 66.67 62.50 66.67 100.00 Slovenia 100.00 50.00 37.50 100.00 66.67 100.00 50.00 37.50 100.00 100.00 Solomon Islands 14.29 Somalia 0.00 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 South Africa 14.29 41.67 37.50 0.00 66.67 100.00 58.33 62.50 100.00 100.00 Spain 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 71.43 50.00 50.00 0.00 100.00 Sri Lanka 14.29 66.67 75.00 66.67 100.00 14.29 75.00 75.00 66.67 100.00 St. Kitts and Nevis 42.86 42.86 St. Lucia 42.86 42.86 100.00 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 14.29 85.71 Sudan 14.29 83.33 75.00 66.67 66.67 28.57 83.33 75.00 66.67 33.33 Suriname 14.29 33.33 25.00 0.00 66.67 14.29 50.00 62.50 66.67 66.67 Swaziland 14.29 41.67 37.50 0.00 66.67 14.29 41.67 37.50 0.00 66.67 Sweden 42.86 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 100.00 58.33 50.00 100.00 100.00 Switzerland 42.86 41.67 37.50 0.00 66.67 42.86 50.00 50.00 0.00 100.00 Syrian Arab Republic 14.29 33.33 25.00 100.00 66.67 14.29 58.33 62.50 100.00 33.33 Tajikistan 100.00 100.00 Tanzania 42.86 83.33 75.00 100.00 66.67 42.86 83.33 75.00 100.00 100.00 Thailand 57.14 50.00 75.00 100.00 66.67 57.14 75.00 87.50 100.00 100.00 Togo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 71.43 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 Tonga 14.29 14.29 Trinidad and Tobago 42.86 100.00 100.00 100.00 66.67 42.86 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Tunisia 14.29 33.33 25.00 100.00 66.67 100.00 58.33 50.00 100.00 100.00 Turkey 57.14 50.00 50.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 66.67 75.00 66.67 100.00 Turkmenistan 100.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 100.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 Uganda 42.86 50.00 50.00 0.00 66.67 42.86 66.67 75.00 100.00 100.00 Ukraine 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 United Arab Emirates 0.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 14.29 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 United Kingdom 14.29 58.33 62.50 66.67 66.67 71.43 75.00 87.50 66.67 100.00 United States 42.86 58.33 62.50 66.67 100.00 100.00 58.33 62.50 66.67 100.00 Uruguay 57.14 75.00 87.50 100.00 66.67 57.14 75.00 87.50 100.00 66.67 Uzbekistan 100.00 75.00 75.00 66.67 66.67 100.00 41.67 37.50 100.00 66.67 Vanuatu 42.86 Venezuela, RB 14.29 66.67 75.00 66.67 66.67 14.29 66.67 75.00 66.67 33.33 Vietnam 14.29 100.00 100.00 Yemen, Rep. 14.29 66.67 14.29 66.67 Zambia 0.00 100.00 100.00 66.67 66.67 71.43 100.00 100.00 66.67 100.00 Zimbabwe 14.29 57.14 100.00

Table 3: Unadjusted Association of Reproductive Health Laws with Income per capita, Fertility Rate and Education

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) OUTCOME Abortion Abortion Abortion Pill Pill Pill Condom Condom Condom IUD IUD IUD Sterilization Sterilization Sterilization

Ln(GDP) (t-1) 14.368*** 13.663*** -0.281 -0.615*** -0.976*** -2.883*** -0.418* -0.852*** -2.769*** 2.879*** 2.285*** -6.271*** 3.413*** 2.908*** -3.231*** (13.691 - (12.986 - (-2.659 - (-1.013 - - (-1.369 - - (-4.013 - - (-0.875 - (-1.305 - - (-4.125 - - (1.940 - (1.326 - (-8.637 - - (2.852 - (2.346 - (-5.312 - - 15.045) 14.339) 2.097) 0.218) 0.582) 1.753) 0.039) 0.399) 1.412) 3.818) 3.243) 3.905) 3.973) 3.471) 1.150) Constant -70.183*** -82.421*** 17.480 64.402*** 59.501*** 63.994*** 61.884*** 56.409*** 47.809*** 42.102*** 35.709*** 142.512*** 51.251*** 44.027*** 43.359*** (-75.934 - - (-90.346 - - (-5.776 - (60.846 - (54.075 - (52.767 - (57.835 - (50.450 - (34.440 - (33.781 - (24.287 - (119.259 - (46.463 - (38.084 - (23.070 - 64.433) 74.496) 40.735) 67.957) 64.926) 75.220) 65.934) 62.368) 61.179) 50.422) 47.131) 165.764) 56.039) 49.969) 63.649)

R-squared 0.257 0.302 0.843 0.002 0.048 0.815 0.001 0.050 0.793 0.010 0.042 0.804 0.034 0.084 0.676

Fertility rate (t-1) -10.000*** -9.540*** 0.798 -0.576*** 0.046 -1.315*** -1.113*** -0.424*** -2.676*** -3.163*** -2.283*** -0.108 -3.029*** -2.363*** -1.380*** (-10.404 - - (-9.980 - - (-0.297 - (-0.851 - - (-0.234 - (-1.936 - - (-1.429 - - (-0.745 - - (-3.439 - - (-3.754 - - (-2.920 - - (-1.319 - (-3.379 - - (-2.754 - - (-2.289 - - 9.596) 9.101) 1.894) 0.300) 0.327) 0.693) 0.797) 0.104) 1.914) 2.573) 1.646) 1.103) 2.680) 1.971) 0.472) Constant 88.953*** 87.324*** 92.606*** 61.338*** 58.963*** 47.821*** 62.498*** 59.997*** 50.158*** 78.323*** 72.598*** 91.947*** 91.494*** 89.948*** 96.424*** (87.002 - (81.106 - (88.402 - (60.314 - (55.412 - (45.614 - (61.302 - (56.230 - (47.522 - (76.201 - (64.967 - (87.003 - (90.050 - (84.548 - (92.274 - 90.905) 93.542) 96.809) 62.363) 62.513) 50.028) 63.694) 63.764) 52.793) 80.445) 80.228) 96.892) 92.938) 95.347) 100.573)

R-squared 0.318 0.326 0.843 0.005 0.043 0.815 0.013 0.049 0.796 0.032 0.050 0.802 0.069 0.096 0.676

Mean years of schooling 5.889*** 5.608*** -0.159 0.072 -0.365*** -0.341 0.365*** -0.119 0.915** 2.267*** 1.779*** -3.621*** 1.782*** 1.360*** -2.203*** (5.347 - (-1.677 - (-0.086 - (-0.528 - - (-0.907 - (0.180 - (-0.308 - (0.196 - (1.924 - (1.403 - (-4.863 - - (1.578 - (1.131 - (-3.373 - - (5.650 - 6.129) 5.869) 1.359) 0.229) 0.202) 0.225) 0.550) 0.070) 1.634) 2.610) 2.155) 2.380) 1.985) 1.588) 1.033) Constant 14.458*** 16.311*** 35.577*** 58.735*** 61.272*** 46.127*** 56.039*** 58.978*** 25.168*** 52.211*** 53.063*** 112.375*** 68.941*** 72.529*** 37.744*** (12.815 - (10.116 - (26.290 - (57.461 - (57.723 - (42.539 - (54.584 - (55.167 - (20.589 - (49.517 - (45.365 - (104.448 - (67.452 - (67.046 - (30.312 - 16.101) 22.506) 44.864) 60.009) 64.822) 49.715) 57.495) 62.790) 29.747) 54.906) 60.761) 120.301) 70.429) 78.013) 45.175)

R-squared 0.298 0.306 0.843 0.000 0.047 0.814 0.004 0.048 0.792 0.045 0.059 0.804 0.064 0.092 0.677

Year FE No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Country FE No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Observations 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 28

Robust 95% CI in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

Table 4: Unadjusted Association of Reproductive Health Laws with Religion, Colonial Origin and Geographical Region

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) OUTCOMES Abortion Abortion Pill Pill Condom Condom IUD IUD Sterilization Sterilization

Proportion of population report being Catholic -0.342*** -0.331*** -0.061*** -0.057*** -0.089*** -0.084*** -0.018 -0.009 -0.015 -0.009 (-0.376 - -0.308) (-0.364 - -0.298) (-0.082 - -0.040) (-0.078 - -0.036) (-0.110 - -0.068) (-0.105 - -0.063) (-0.053 - 0.018) (-0.044 - 0.026) (-0.040 - 0.011) (-0.034 - 0.017) Muslim -0.385*** -0.379*** -0.030** -0.028** -0.053*** -0.050*** 0.088*** 0.093*** -0.153*** -0.150*** (-0.427 - -0.343) (-0.420 - -0.338) (-0.055 - -0.005) (-0.053 - -0.003) (-0.079 - -0.027) (-0.076 - -0.025) (0.044 - 0.132) (0.049 - 0.136) (-0.185 - -0.121) (-0.181 - -0.118) Protestant 0.159*** 0.172*** -0.113*** -0.109*** -0.138*** -0.133*** -0.053 -0.043 0.121*** 0.128*** (0.110 - 0.208) (0.125 - 0.218) (-0.142 - -0.085) (-0.137 - -0.081) (-0.169 - -0.107) (-0.164 - -0.102) (-0.121 - 0.015) (-0.111 - 0.024) (0.087 - 0.156) (0.095 - 0.161) Constant 69.912*** 50.610*** 63.495*** 57.238*** 64.443*** 56.748*** 66.120*** 56.027*** 82.173*** 70.754*** (67.355 - 72.470) (44.576 - 56.643) (61.841 - 65.148) (52.910 - 61.565)(62.857 - 66.029) (52.191 - 61.305) (63.523 - 68.717) (47.644 - 64.410) (80.331 - 84.014) (66.104 - 75.404)

R-squared 0.161 0.232 0.020 0.061 0.025 0.070 0.011 0.045 0.067 0.128

Colonial Origin Britain 46.795*** 46.756*** 64.574*** 64.438*** 62.794*** 62.966*** 64.957*** 63.139*** 83.654*** 84.158*** (44.839 - 48.751) (40.804 - 52.708) (63.535 - 65.613) (61.119 - 67.757)(61.652 - 63.935) (59.402 - 66.530) (62.664 - 67.251) (55.847 - 70.431) (82.350 - 84.957) (79.022 - 89.293) France 27.150*** 26.999*** 50.882*** 50.688*** 48.006*** 48.109*** 47.446*** 45.542*** 66.298*** 66.715*** (25.538 - 28.761) (21.154 - 32.844) (49.573 - 52.191) (47.288 - 54.088)(46.460 - 49.551) (44.445 - 51.773) (43.857 - 51.035) (37.755 - 53.328) (64.776 - 67.820) (61.508 - 71.921) Spain 28.067*** 27.897*** 61.345*** 61.140*** 60.483*** 60.575*** 79.384*** 77.463*** 82.913*** 83.314*** (26.311 - 29.824) (22.003 - 33.791) (59.951 - 62.738) (57.721 - 64.559)(58.864 - 62.102) (56.875 - 64.275) (77.610 - 81.158) (70.355 - 84.571) (81.065 - 84.761) (78.016 - 88.612) USSR 93.695*** 90.225*** 53.086*** 51.137*** 58.758*** 56.924*** 89.609*** 84.842*** 78.189*** 76.178*** (92.442 - 94.948) (84.414 - 96.036) (51.257 - 54.915) (47.345 - 54.929)(56.822 - 60.694) (52.919 - 60.928) (87.926 - 91.292) (77.642 - 92.043) (76.118 - 80.261) (70.683 - 81.672) Others 42.439*** 42.400*** 56.471*** 56.335*** 55.357*** 55.529*** 71.551*** 69.732*** 74.725*** 75.229*** (38.173 - 46.704) (35.324 - 49.475) (54.578 - 58.365) (52.722 - 59.948)(52.876 - 57.839) (51.434 - 59.625) (68.635 - 74.467) (62.303 - 77.162) (71.511 - 77.940) (69.298 - 81.160) Never colonized1 72.421*** 71.912*** 60.695*** 60.313*** 59.963*** 59.867*** 63.742*** 61.534*** 85.679*** 85.837***

(70.459 - 74.383) (65.961 - 77.863) (59.801 - 61.589) (57.024 - 63.603)(58.929 - 60.998) (56.340 - 63.394) (61.797 - 65.686) (54.332 - 68.736) (84.275 - 87.084) (80.712 - 90.961)

R-squared 0.800 0.815 0.931 0.934 0.908 0.913 0.805 0.811 0.930 0.935

1Never colonized by a Western oversea or USSR

Geographical Region Africa 33.305*** 33.108*** 56.034*** 55.589*** 53.827*** 53.426*** 49.110*** 47.110*** 74.757*** 74.802*** (31.794 - 34.815) (27.419 - 38.797) (54.845 - 57.222) (52.284 - 58.895)(52.515 - 55.139) (49.899 - 56.953) (46.440 - 51.781) (39.907 - 54.312) (73.400 - 76.114) (69.887 - 79.717) CIS/Central Asia 100.000 93.281*** 48.977*** 44.814*** 48.465*** 43.684*** 100.000 92.286*** 65.789*** 60.644*** (100.000 - 100.000) (87.562 - 99.000) (47.051 - 50.902) (41.086 - 48.542)(45.576 - 51.354) (39.200 - 48.167) (100.000 - 100.000) (85.354 - 99.218) (62.704 - 68.875) (54.890 - 66.398) East Asia/Pacific 45.752*** 45.855*** 73.729*** 73.451*** 72.849*** 72.653*** 75.163*** 73.399*** 92.157*** 92.452*** (42.404 - 49.099) (39.401 - 52.308) (72.679 - 74.779) (70.204 - 76.699)(71.659 - 74.038) (69.161 - 76.146) (72.610 - 77.717) (66.222 - 80.576) (90.862 - 93.452) (87.655 - 97.249) Latin America/Caribbean 31.292*** 31.134*** 59.032*** 58.609*** 57.374*** 56.999*** 72.659*** 70.687*** 79.849*** 79.926*** (29.621 - 32.962) (25.403 - 36.865) (57.748 - 60.317) (55.308 - 61.910)(55.894 - 58.853) (53.430 - 60.569) (70.269 - 75.048) (63.614 - 77.761) (78.198 - 81.500) (74.952 - 84.900) OECD-Europe 77.459*** 76.745*** 56.651*** 55.918*** 57.118*** 56.388*** 66.922*** 64.476*** 86.109*** 85.753*** (75.833 - 79.084) (71.027 - 82.463) (55.913 - 57.389) (52.715 - 59.121)(56.268 - 57.969) (52.982 - 59.793) (65.380 - 68.465) (57.586 - 71.366) (84.881 - 87.337) (80.926 - 90.580) Middle East/North Africa 38.116*** 38.023*** 63.617*** 63.234*** 63.723*** 63.399*** 84.823*** 82.909*** 54.752*** 54.888*** (34.321 - 41.910) (31.284 - 44.762) (61.688 - 65.546) (59.654 - 66.815)(60.937 - 66.510) (59.184 - 67.614) (81.874 - 87.772) (75.628 - 90.189) (52.457 - 57.046) (49.629 - 60.147)

R-squared 0.802 0.818 0.934 0.938 0.911 0.917 0.808 0.814 0.935 0.940

Year FE No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Country FE No No No No No No No No No No Observations 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855 3855

Robust 95% CI in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

Figure 1: Global Average Trends of Reproductive Health Laws Liberalization

100

0 Percent of MaximumLiberalizationPercent of Score 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year

Abortion Pill Condom IUD Sterilization

Figure 2: Aggregated Trends of Abortion Law Liberalization by Sociodemographic factors

100

0 0

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Percent of MaximumAbortionPercent of LiberalizationScore

Percent of MaximumAbortionPercent of LiberalizationScore Year Year Country Income Classification Mean Years of Schooling Low income Lower middle income less than 1 year 1 to 5 years Upper middle income High income (not OECD) 6 to 10 years more than 10 years

High income (OECD)

100

0 0

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Percent of MaximumAbortionPercent of LiberalizationScore Percent of MaximumAbortionPercent of LiberalizationScore Year Year Colonial Origin Geographic Region Britain France Africa CIS/Central Asia Spain USSR East Asia/Pacific Latin America/Caribbean Others Never colonized by a western oversea or USSR OECD/Europe Middle East/North Africa

REFERENCES WEB APPENDIX: FOR PUBLICATION ONLINE Table 1.Reproductive Health Law Index 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2009. Annual panel 1960-2009 will be published online. 10 year panel

shown here for brevity.

Maximum Liberalization Maximum

: Legal :

Name

om:Total

terilization: Total terilization:

UD: Total UD: Liberalization Maximum of % UD:

year Country number ID Country Threatening Life Abortion: Mother of the Health Physical Abortion: Mother ofthe Health Mental Abortion: or Incest Rape Abortion: Impairment Fetal Abortion: Economic Abortion: Request On Abortion: Total Abortion: of % Abortion: Purpose Sale Pill: Location Sale Pill: Requirement Prescription Pill: Subsidy Pill: Advertising Commercial Pill: Total Pill: Liberalization Maximum of % Pill: Purpose Sale Condom: Subsidy Condom: Advertising Commercial Condom: Cond Liberalization Maximum of % Condom: Legal IUD: Installs Doctor IUD: I I Sterilization S of % Maximum Sterilization: Liberalization 1960 Afghanistan 1 2 2 66.67 1970 Afghanistan 1 2 2 66.67 1980 Afghanistan 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Afghanistan 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Afghanistan 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Afghanistan 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Albania 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 2 66.67 1970 Albania 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 2 66.67 1980 Albania 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Albania 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 42.86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Albania 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Albania 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Algeria 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 2 66.67 1970 Algeria 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1 1 33.33 1980 Algeria 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Algeria 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33

2000 Algeria 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2009 Algeria 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Andorra 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1970 Andorra 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1980 Andorra 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1990 Andorra 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 2000 Andorra 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 3 3 100.00 2009 Andorra 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1960 Angola 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 Angola 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 Angola 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Angola 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Angola 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Angola 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Antigua and Barbuda 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 1970 Antigua and Barbuda 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 1980 Antigua and Barbuda 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 1990 Antigua and Barbuda 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2000 Antigua and Barbuda 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2009 Antigua and Barbuda 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 1960 Argentina 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 1 2 0 5 41.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Argentina 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 2 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Argentina 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Argentina 8 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 1 1 1 2 0 5 41.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2000 Argentina 8 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Argentina 8 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Armenia 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Armenia 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Armenia 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67

1990 Armenia 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Armenia 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Armenia 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Australia 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Australia 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1980 Australia 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Australia 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Australia 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Australia 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Austria 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Austria 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Austria 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Austria 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Austria 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Austria 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Azerbaijan 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Azerbaijan 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Azerbaijan 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Azerbaijan 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Azerbaijan 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Azerbaijan 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Bahamas, The 14 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Bahamas, The 14 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Bahamas, The 14 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Bahamas, The 14 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Bahamas, The 14 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Bahamas, The 14 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Bahrain 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Bahrain 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67

1980 Bahrain 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Bahrain 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Bahrain 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2009 Bahrain 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Bangladesh 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Bangladesh 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Bangladesh 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Bangladesh 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Bangladesh 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Bangladesh 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Barbados 17 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Barbados 17 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1980 Barbados 17 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Barbados 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Barbados 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Barbados 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Belarus 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Belarus 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Belarus 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Belarus 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Belarus 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Belarus 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Belgium 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 1970 Belgium 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 1980 Belgium 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 1990 Belgium 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2000 Belgium 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2009 Belgium 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Belize 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67

1970 Belize 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Belize 20 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Belize 20 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Belize 20 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Belize 20 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Benin 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Benin 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Benin 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 3 0 6 50.00 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Benin 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 3 0 6 50.00 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2000 Benin 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 3 1 7 58.33 1 1 1 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Benin 21 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 3 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Bolivia 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 2 1 0 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Bolivia 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 2 1 0 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Bolivia 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Bolivia 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2000 Bolivia 24 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Bolivia 24 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Bosnia and Herzegovina 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1970 Bosnia and Herzegovina 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 1980 Bosnia and Herzegovina 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 1990 Bosnia and Herzegovina 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2000 Bosnia and Herzegovina 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2009 Bosnia and Herzegovina 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 1960 Botswana 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Botswana 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Botswana 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Botswana 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Botswana 26 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Botswana 26 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00

1960 Brazil 27 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Brazil 27 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Brazil 27 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Brazil 27 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2000 Brazil 27 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Brazil 27 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Brunei 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Brunei 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Brunei 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Brunei 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Brunei 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Brunei 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Bulgaria 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Bulgaria 29 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1980 Bulgaria 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Bulgaria 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Bulgaria 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Bulgaria 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Burkina Faso 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Burkina Faso 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Burkina Faso 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Burkina Faso 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Burkina Faso 30 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Burkina Faso 30 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Burundi 31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Burundi 31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Burundi 31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Burundi 31 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Burundi 31 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67

2009 Burundi 31 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Cambodia 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1970 Cambodia 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1980 Cambodia 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1990 Cambodia 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2000 Cambodia 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2009 Cambodia 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1960 Cameroon 33 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Cameroon 33 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Cameroon 33 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Cameroon 33 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Cameroon 33 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Cameroon 33 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Canada 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Canada 34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Canada 34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Canada 34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Canada 34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 3 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Canada 34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 3 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Cape Verde 35 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 1 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Cape Verde 35 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 1 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Cape Verde 35 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Cape Verde 35 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Cape Verde 35 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Cape Verde 35 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Central African Republic 37 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1970 Central African Republic 37 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1980 Central African Republic 37 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Central African Republic 37 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67

2000 Central African Republic 37 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Central African Republic 37 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Chad 38 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1970 Chad 38 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1980 Chad 38 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Chad 38 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Chad 38 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Chad 38 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Chile 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Chile 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Chile 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Chile 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Chile 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Chile 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 China 41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 3 0 9 75.00 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 China 41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 3 0 9 75.00 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 China 41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 China 41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 China 41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 3 2 11 91.67 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 China 41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 3 2 11 91.67 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Colombia 42 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Colombia 42 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Colombia 42 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Colombia 42 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Colombia 42 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Colombia 42 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Comoros 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1970 Comoros 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1980 Comoros 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00

1990 Comoros 43 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Comoros 43 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Comoros 43 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Congo, Dem. Rep 44 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Congo, Dem. Rep 44 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Congo, Dem. Rep 44 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Congo, Dem. Rep 44 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Congo, Dem. Rep 44 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Congo, Dem. Rep 44 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Congo, Rep. 45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1970 Congo, Rep. 45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1980 Congo, Rep. 45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1990 Congo, Rep. 45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2000 Congo, Rep. 45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2009 Congo, Rep. 45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 1960 Costa Rica 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Costa Rica 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Costa Rica 46 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Costa Rica 46 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Costa Rica 46 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 3 2 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Costa Rica 46 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 3 2 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Cote d'Ivoire 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 2 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Cote d'Ivoire 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 2 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Cote d'Ivoire 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 2 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Cote d'Ivoire 47 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Cote d'Ivoire 47 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Cote d'Ivoire 47 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Croatia 48 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Croatia 48 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67

1980 Croatia 48 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Croatia 48 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Croatia 48 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Croatia 48 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Cuba 49 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 2 66.67 1970 Cuba 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 3 3 100.00 1980 Cuba 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Cuba 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Cuba 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Cuba 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1960 Cyprus 50 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Cyprus 50 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Cyprus 50 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Cyprus 50 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Cyprus 50 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Cyprus 50 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Czech Republic 51 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Czech Republic 51 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1980 Czech Republic 51 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Czech Republic 51 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Czech Republic 51 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Czech Republic 51 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Denmark 52 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Denmark 52 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Denmark 52 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 1 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Denmark 52 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 1 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Denmark 52 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 1 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Denmark 52 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 1 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Djibouti 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

1970 Djibouti 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1980 Djibouti 53 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Djibouti 53 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Djibouti 53 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2009 Djibouti 53 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 1960 Dominica 54 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Dominica 54 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Dominica 54 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Dominica 54 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Dominica 54 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Dominica 54 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Dominican Republic 55 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Dominican Republic 55 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 3 11 91.67 2 2 3 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1980 Dominican Republic 55 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 3 11 91.67 2 2 3 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Dominican Republic 55 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 3 11 91.67 2 2 3 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Dominican Republic 55 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 3 11 91.67 2 2 3 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Dominican Republic 55 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 3 11 91.67 2 2 3 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Ecuador 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Ecuador 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Ecuador 56 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Ecuador 56 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Ecuador 56 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Ecuador 56 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Egypt, Arab Rep. 57 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 Egypt, Arab Rep. 57 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 3 3 11 91.67 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Egypt, Arab Rep. 57 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Egypt, Arab Rep. 57 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2000 Egypt, Arab Rep. 57 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2009 Egypt, Arab Rep. 57 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67

1960 El Salvador 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 El Salvador 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 El Salvador 58 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 El Salvador 58 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 El Salvador 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 El Salvador 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Equatorial Guinea 59 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 Equatorial Guinea 59 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 Equatorial Guinea 59 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Equatorial Guinea 59 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Equatorial Guinea 59 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2009 Equatorial Guinea 59 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1960 Eritrea 60 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 1 0 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Eritrea 60 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Eritrea 60 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Eritrea 60 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2000 Eritrea 60 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Eritrea 60 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Estonia 61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Estonia 61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Estonia 61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Estonia 61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Estonia 61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Estonia 61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Ethiopia 62 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 1 0 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Ethiopia 62 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Ethiopia 62 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Ethiopia 62 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Ethiopia 62 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67

2009 Ethiopia 62 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Fiji 64 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Fiji 64 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Fiji 64 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Fiji 64 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Fiji 64 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Fiji 64 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Finland 65 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1970 Finland 65 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1980 Finland 65 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Finland 65 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Finland 65 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Finland 65 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 France 66 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 France 66 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 France 66 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 France 66 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 France 66 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 France 66 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Gabon 68 2 2 66.67 1970 Gabon 68 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Gabon 68 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Gabon 68 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Gabon 68 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Gabon 68 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Gambia, The 69 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Gambia, The 69 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 2 11 91.67 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Gambia, The 69 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 2 11 91.67 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Gambia, The 69 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 2 11 91.67 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67

2000 Gambia, The 69 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 2 11 91.67 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Gambia, The 69 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 2 11 91.67 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Georgia 70 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Georgia 70 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Georgia 70 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Georgia 70 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Georgia 70 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Georgia 70 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Germany 71 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Germany 71 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Germany 71 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 1 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Germany 71 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 1 1 1 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Germany 71 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 1 1 1 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Germany 71 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 1 1 1 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Ghana 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1970 Ghana 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Ghana 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Ghana 72 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Ghana 72 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Ghana 72 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Greece 73 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1970 Greece 73 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1980 Greece 73 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 1 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 1990 Greece 73 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 1 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2000 Greece 73 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 1 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Greece 73 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 1 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Grenada 75 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1970 Grenada 75 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1980 Grenada 75 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86

1990 Grenada 75 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2000 Grenada 75 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2009 Grenada 75 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1960 Guatemala 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 1 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Guatemala 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 1 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Guatemala 77 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 1 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Guatemala 77 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 1 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Guatemala 77 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 1 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Guatemala 77 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 1 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 1960 Guinea 78 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Guinea 78 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Guinea 78 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Guinea 78 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Guinea 78 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Guinea 78 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Guinea-Bissau 79 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Guinea-Bissau 79 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Guinea-Bissau 79 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Guinea-Bissau 79 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2000 Guinea-Bissau 79 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Guinea-Bissau 79 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Guyana 80 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Guyana 80 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Guyana 80 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Guyana 80 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Guyana 80 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Guyana 80 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Haiti 81 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Haiti 81 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67

1980 Haiti 81 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Haiti 81 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Haiti 81 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Haiti 81 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Honduras 82 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 0 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Honduras 82 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 0 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1980 Honduras 82 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 0 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Honduras 82 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 0 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Honduras 82 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 0 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Honduras 82 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 0 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Hungary 84 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Hungary 84 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Hungary 84 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Hungary 84 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Hungary 84 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Hungary 84 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Iceland 85 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Iceland 85 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Iceland 85 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Iceland 85 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Iceland 85 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Iceland 85 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 1960 India 86 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 India 86 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1980 India 86 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 2 0 8 66.67 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 India 86 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 2 0 8 66.67 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 India 86 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 India 86 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Indonesia 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67

1970 Indonesia 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Indonesia 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Indonesia 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2000 Indonesia 87 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Indonesia 87 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Iran, Islamic Rep. 88 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Iran, Islamic Rep. 88 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Iran, Islamic Rep. 88 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Iran, Islamic Rep. 88 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2000 Iran, Islamic Rep. 88 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 3 10 83.33 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Iran, Islamic Rep. 88 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 28.57 2 1 1 3 3 10 83.33 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Iraq 89 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 28.57 1 1 1 2 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Iraq 89 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 28.57 1 1 1 2 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Iraq 89 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 28.57 1 2 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Iraq 89 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 28.57 1 2 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Iraq 89 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 28.57 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Iraq 89 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Ireland 90 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 0 1 0 1 12.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Ireland 90 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 0 1 0 1 12.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Ireland 90 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Ireland 90 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Ireland 90 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Ireland 90 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Israel 92 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Israel 92 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Israel 92 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Israel 92 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Israel 92 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Israel 92 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00

1960 Italy 93 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 2 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 0 0 0.00 1970 Italy 93 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 2 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 0 0 0.00 1980 Italy 93 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Italy 93 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Italy 93 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Italy 93 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 2 9 75.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Jamaica 94 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Jamaica 94 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Jamaica 94 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Jamaica 94 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 3 10 83.33 2 2 3 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Jamaica 94 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 3 10 83.33 2 2 3 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Jamaica 94 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 3 10 83.33 2 2 3 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Japan 95 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 0 1 1 1 0 3 25.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1970 Japan 95 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 0 1 1 1 0 3 25.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1980 Japan 95 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 1990 Japan 95 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2000 Japan 95 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2009 Japan 95 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 1960 Jordan 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2 1 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1970 Jordan 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2 1 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1980 Jordan 96 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Jordan 96 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Jordan 96 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Jordan 96 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 1 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Kazakhstan 97 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Kazakhstan 97 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Kazakhstan 97 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Kazakhstan 97 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Kazakhstan 97 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67

2009 Kazakhstan 97 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Kenya 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Kenya 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1980 Kenya 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Kenya 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Kenya 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Kenya 98 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Kiribati 99 1970 Kiribati 99 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 Kiribati 99 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Kiribati 99 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Kiribati 99 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2009 Kiribati 99 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1960 Korea, Dem. Rep. 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1970 Korea, Dem. Rep. 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1980 Korea, Dem. Rep. 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1990 Korea, Dem. Rep. 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2000 Korea, Dem. Rep. 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2009 Korea, Dem. Rep. 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1960 Korea, Rep. 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 0 0 0.00 1970 Korea, Rep. 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Korea, Rep. 101 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Korea, Rep. 101 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 3 2 10 83.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Korea, Rep. 101 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Korea, Rep. 101 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Kuwait 102 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 Kuwait 102 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 Kuwait 102 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Kuwait 102 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 57.14

2000 Kuwait 102 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 57.14 2009 Kuwait 102 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 57.14 1960 Kyrgyz Republic 103 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Kyrgyz Republic 103 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Kyrgyz Republic 103 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Kyrgyz Republic 103 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Kyrgyz Republic 103 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2009 Kyrgyz Republic 103 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1960 Lao PDR 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1970 Lao PDR 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1980 Lao PDR 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1990 Lao PDR 104 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Lao PDR 104 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2009 Lao PDR 104 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1960 Latvia 105 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Latvia 105 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Latvia 105 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Latvia 105 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Latvia 105 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Latvia 105 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Lebanon 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 2 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Lebanon 106 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 2 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Lebanon 106 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 2 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Lebanon 106 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2000 Lebanon 106 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Lebanon 106 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Lesotho 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1970 Lesotho 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Lesotho 107 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67

1990 Lesotho 107 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Lesotho 107 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Lesotho 107 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Liberia 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Liberia 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Liberia 108 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Liberia 108 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Liberia 108 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Liberia 108 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Libya 109 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Libya 109 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Libya 109 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Libya 109 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2000 Libya 109 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Libya 109 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Liechtenstein 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Liechtenstein 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Liechtenstein 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Liechtenstein 110 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 3 3 100.00 2000 Liechtenstein 110 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 3 3 100.00 2009 Liechtenstein 110 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 3 3 100.00 1960 Lithuania 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Lithuania 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Lithuania 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Lithuania 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Lithuania 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Lithuania 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Luxembourg 112 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Luxembourg 112 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67

1980 Luxembourg 112 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Luxembourg 112 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Luxembourg 112 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Luxembourg 112 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Macedonia, FYR 114 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Macedonia, FYR 114 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Macedonia, FYR 114 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Macedonia, FYR 114 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Macedonia, FYR 114 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Macedonia, FYR 114 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Madagascar 115 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 2 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Madagascar 115 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 2 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Madagascar 115 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 2 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Madagascar 115 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Madagascar 115 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Madagascar 115 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Malawi 116 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Malawi 116 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Malawi 116 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Malawi 116 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 3 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Malawi 116 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 3 9 75.00 2 2 3 7 87.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Malawi 116 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 3 9 75.00 2 2 3 7 87.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Malaysia 117 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Malaysia 117 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Malaysia 117 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Malaysia 117 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Malaysia 117 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Malaysia 117 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Maldives 118 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57

1970 Maldives 118 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 1980 Maldives 118 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 1990 Maldives 118 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 2000 Maldives 118 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 2009 Maldives 118 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 28.57 1960 Mali 119 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Mali 119 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Mali 119 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Mali 119 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Mali 119 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Mali 119 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 2 2 1 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Malta 120 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Malta 120 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Malta 120 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 2 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Malta 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 1 1 2 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Malta 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 1 1 2 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 2009 Malta 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 1 1 2 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Marshall Islands 121 1970 Marshall Islands 121 1980 Marshall Islands 121 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Marshall Islands 121 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Marshall Islands 121 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2009 Marshall Islands 121 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1960 Mauritania 122 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Mauritania 122 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Mauritania 122 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Mauritania 122 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Mauritania 122 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 2009 Mauritania 122 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67

1960 Mauritius 123 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Mauritius 123 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Mauritius 123 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Mauritius 123 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Mauritius 123 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Mauritius 123 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Mexico 125 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Mexico 125 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Mexico 125 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Mexico 125 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Mexico 125 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Mexico 125 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 126 1970 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 126 1980 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 126 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 126 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 126 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2009 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 126 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1960 Moldova 127 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Moldova 127 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Moldova 127 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Moldova 127 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2000 Moldova 127 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2009 Moldova 127 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 16.67 2 2 25.00 1 1 33.33 3 3 100.00 1960 Monaco 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Monaco 128 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1980 Monaco 128 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1990 Monaco 128 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Monaco 128 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29

2009 Monaco 128 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 66.67 1960 Mongolia 129 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1970 Mongolia 129 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1980 Mongolia 129 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1990 Mongolia 129 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Mongolia 129 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Mongolia 129 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Morocco 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Morocco 130 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 1 1 3 9 75.00 0 0 3 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Morocco 130 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 1 1 3 9 75.00 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Morocco 130 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 1 1 3 9 75.00 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Morocco 130 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 1 1 3 9 75.00 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Morocco 130 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 1 1 3 9 75.00 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Mozambique 131 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1970 Mozambique 131 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1980 Mozambique 131 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 42.86 3 3 100.00 1990 Mozambique 131 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 42.86 3 3 100.00 2000 Mozambique 131 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 42.86 3 3 100.00 2009 Mozambique 131 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 42.86 2 2 66.67 1960 Myanmar 132 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Myanmar 132 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1980 Myanmar 132 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Myanmar 132 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Myanmar 132 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 2009 Myanmar 132 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1960 Namibia 133 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 1970 Namibia 133 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 1980 Namibia 133 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Namibia 133 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00

2000 Namibia 133 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Namibia 133 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Nepal 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Nepal 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Nepal 134 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Nepal 134 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Nepal 134 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Nepal 134 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Netherlands 135 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Netherlands 135 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Netherlands 135 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Netherlands 135 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Netherlands 135 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Netherlands 135 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 New Zealand 138 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 0 0 0.00 1970 New Zealand 138 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 0 0 0.00 1980 New Zealand 138 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 New Zealand 138 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 New Zealand 138 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 New Zealand 138 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Nicaragua 139 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1970 Nicaragua 139 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1980 Nicaragua 139 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Nicaragua 139 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Nicaragua 139 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Nicaragua 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Niger 140 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 3 0 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Niger 140 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 3 0 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Niger 140 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 3 0 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67

1990 Niger 140 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Niger 140 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Niger 140 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Nigeria 141 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Nigeria 141 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Nigeria 141 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Nigeria 141 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Nigeria 141 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Nigeria 141 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Norway 143 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Norway 143 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Norway 143 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Norway 143 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Norway 143 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Norway 143 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Oman 144 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 Oman 144 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 Oman 144 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Oman 144 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Oman 144 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 0 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2009 Oman 144 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 2 0 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 1960 Pakistan 145 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Pakistan 145 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1980 Pakistan 145 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Pakistan 145 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Pakistan 145 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Pakistan 145 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Palau 146 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 Palau 146 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29

1980 Palau 146 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Palau 146 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Palau 146 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2009 Palau 146 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1960 Panama 147 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1970 Panama 147 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1980 Panama 147 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Panama 147 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Panama 147 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Panama 147 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Papua New Guinea 148 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Papua New Guinea 148 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Papua New Guinea 148 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Papua New Guinea 148 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Papua New Guinea 148 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Papua New Guinea 148 1 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Paraguay 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Paraguay 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Paraguay 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Paraguay 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Paraguay 149 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Paraguay 149 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Peru 150 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Peru 150 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Peru 150 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 1990 Peru 150 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2000 Peru 150 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Peru 150 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Philippines 151 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67

1970 Philippines 151 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Philippines 151 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Philippines 151 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Philippines 151 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Philippines 151 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Poland 152 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Poland 152 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1980 Poland 152 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Poland 152 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Poland 152 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Poland 152 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Portugal 153 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1970 Portugal 153 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Portugal 153 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Portugal 153 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Portugal 153 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Portugal 153 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Qatar 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1970 Qatar 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1980 Qatar 155 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Qatar 155 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 57.14 2000 Qatar 155 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 57.14 2009 Qatar 155 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 57.14 1960 Romania 156 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Romania 156 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Romania 156 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Romania 156 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Romania 156 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Romania 156 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00

1960 Russian Federation 157 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 3 9 75.00 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Russian Federation 157 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 3 9 75.00 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Russian Federation 157 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Russian Federation 157 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Russian Federation 157 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Russian Federation 157 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Rwanda 158 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Rwanda 158 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Rwanda 158 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Rwanda 158 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Rwanda 158 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2009 Rwanda 158 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1960 Samoa 159 1970 Samoa 159 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1980 Samoa 159 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1990 Samoa 159 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2000 Samoa 159 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2009 Samoa 159 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1960 San Marino 160 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 San Marino 160 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 San Marino 160 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 San Marino 160 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 San Marino 160 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2009 San Marino 160 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1960 Sao Tome and Principe 161 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 Sao Tome and Principe 161 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 Sao Tome and Principe 161 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Sao Tome and Principe 161 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Sao Tome and Principe 161 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29

2009 Sao Tome and Principe 161 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1960 Saudi Arabia 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Saudi Arabia 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Saudi Arabia 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Saudi Arabia 162 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1 1 33.33 2000 Saudi Arabia 162 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1 1 33.33 2009 Saudi Arabia 162 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 2 1 0 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 1960 Senegal 163 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 2 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Senegal 163 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 2 1 0 5 41.67 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Senegal 163 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Senegal 163 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Senegal 163 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Senegal 163 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Seychelles 165 1970 Seychelles 165 1980 Seychelles 165 1990 Seychelles 165 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2000 Seychelles 165 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2009 Seychelles 165 1960 Sierra Leone 166 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Sierra Leone 166 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Sierra Leone 166 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Sierra Leone 166 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Sierra Leone 166 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Sierra Leone 166 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Singapore 167 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Singapore 167 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Singapore 167 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Singapore 167 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00

2000 Singapore 167 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Singapore 167 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Slovak Republic 168 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Slovak Republic 168 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1980 Slovak Republic 168 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Slovak Republic 168 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Slovak Republic 168 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Slovak Republic 168 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Slovenia 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Slovenia 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Slovenia 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Slovenia 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Slovenia 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Slovenia 169 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Solomon Islands 170 1970 Solomon Islands 170 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 Solomon Islands 170 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Solomon Islands 170 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Solomon Islands 170 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2009 Solomon Islands 170 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1960 Somalia 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Somalia 171 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1980 Somalia 171 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 1990 Somalia 171 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Somalia 171 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Somalia 171 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 South Africa 172 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 South Africa 172 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 South Africa 172 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00

1990 South Africa 172 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2000 South Africa 172 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 South Africa 172 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Spain 173 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Spain 173 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Spain 173 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Spain 173 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Spain 173 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Spain 173 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Sri Lanka 174 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1970 Sri Lanka 174 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1980 Sri Lanka 174 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Sri Lanka 174 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Sri Lanka 174 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Sri Lanka 174 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 2 2 2 9 75.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 St. Kitts and Nevis 175 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1970 St. Kitts and Nevis 175 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1980 St. Kitts and Nevis 175 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1990 St. Kitts and Nevis 175 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2000 St. Kitts and Nevis 175 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2009 St. Kitts and Nevis 175 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1960 St. Lucia 176 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1970 St. Lucia 176 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1980 St. Lucia 176 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1990 St. Lucia 176 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 3 3 100.00 2000 St. Lucia 176 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 3 3 100.00 2009 St. Lucia 176 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1960 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 177 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 177 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29

1980 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 177 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 177 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2000 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 177 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 2009 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 177 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.71 1960 Sudan 178 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Sudan 178 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Sudan 178 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Sudan 178 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 2 1 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2000 Sudan 178 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 2 2 1 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2009 Sudan 178 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 28.57 2 2 2 1 3 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 1960 Suriname 179 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Suriname 179 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Suriname 179 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Suriname 179 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2000 Suriname 179 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 2009 Suriname 179 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1960 Swaziland 180 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Swaziland 180 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Swaziland 180 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Swaziland 180 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Swaziland 180 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Swaziland 180 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Sweden 181 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Sweden 181 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Sweden 181 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 0 6 50.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Sweden 181 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Sweden 181 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Sweden 181 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 0 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Switzerland 182 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67

1970 Switzerland 182 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Switzerland 182 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Switzerland 182 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Switzerland 182 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Switzerland 182 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Syrian Arab Republic 183 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Syrian Arab Republic 183 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Syrian Arab Republic 183 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Syrian Arab Republic 183 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Syrian Arab Republic 183 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2009 Syrian Arab Republic 183 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 3 0 7 58.33 2 3 0 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Tajikistan 185 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Tajikistan 185 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Tajikistan 185 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Tajikistan 185 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Tajikistan 185 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Tajikistan 185 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Tanzania 186 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Tanzania 186 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Tanzania 186 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Tanzania 186 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Tanzania 186 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Tanzania 186 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 1 10 83.33 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Thailand 187 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Thailand 187 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 2 0 7 58.33 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Thailand 187 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Thailand 187 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Thailand 187 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Thailand 187 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 2 3 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00

1960 Togo 189 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Togo 189 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Togo 189 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Togo 189 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 1 1 33.33 2000 Togo 189 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Togo 189 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Tonga 190 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 Tonga 190 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 Tonga 190 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1990 Tonga 190 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2000 Tonga 190 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2009 Tonga 190 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1960 Trinidad and Tobago 191 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Trinidad and Tobago 191 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Trinidad and Tobago 191 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Trinidad and Tobago 191 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Trinidad and Tobago 191 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Trinidad and Tobago 191 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Tunisia 192 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 1 1 0 4 33.33 1 1 0 2 25.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Tunisia 192 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Tunisia 192 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1990 Tunisia 192 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Tunisia 192 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 1 7 58.33 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Tunisia 192 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 2 1 8 66.67 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Turkey 193 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Turkey 193 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Turkey 193 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 57.14 2 1 1 1 1 6 50.00 2 1 1 4 50.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Turkey 193 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Turkey 193 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00

2009 Turkey 193 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Turkmenistan 194 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Turkmenistan 194 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Turkmenistan 194 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Turkmenistan 194 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Turkmenistan 194 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Turkmenistan 194 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Uganda 195 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Uganda 195 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Uganda 195 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Uganda 195 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 0 6 50.00 2 2 0 4 50.00 0 0 0 0.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Uganda 195 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Uganda 195 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 3 1 8 66.67 2 3 1 6 75.00 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Ukraine 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Ukraine 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Ukraine 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Ukraine 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Ukraine 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Ukraine 196 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 United Arab Emirates 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 United Arab Emirates 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 United Arab Emirates 197 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 United Arab Emirates 197 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 United Arab Emirates 197 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 United Arab Emirates 197 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 United Kingdom 198 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 United Kingdom 198 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 1 2 7 58.33 2 1 2 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 United Kingdom 198 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 2 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 United Kingdom 198 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 2 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00

2000 United Kingdom 198 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 2 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 United Kingdom 198 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 1 1 3 2 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 United States 199 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1970 United States 199 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1980 United States 199 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 United States 199 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 United States 199 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 United States 199 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 2 1 7 58.33 2 2 1 5 62.50 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Uruguay 200 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1970 Uruguay 200 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1980 Uruguay 200 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1990 Uruguay 200 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Uruguay 200 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Uruguay 200 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 57.14 2 2 2 2 1 9 75.00 2 3 2 7 87.50 1 2 3 100.00 3 3 100.00 1960 Uzbekistan 201 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Uzbekistan 201 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 2 1 2 8 66.67 2 1 3 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Uzbekistan 201 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1990 Uzbekistan 201 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2000 Uzbekistan 201 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 2009 Uzbekistan 201 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 2 1 1 1 0 5 41.67 2 1 0 3 37.50 1 2 3 100.00 2 2 66.67 1960 Vanuatu 202 1970 Vanuatu 202 1980 Vanuatu 202 1990 Vanuatu 202 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2000 Vanuatu 202 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 2009 Vanuatu 202 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 42.86 1960 Venezuela, RB 203 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Venezuela, RB 203 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1980 Venezuela, RB 203 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33

1990 Venezuela, RB 203 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2000 Venezuela, RB 203 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 2009 Venezuela, RB 203 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 1 1 2 2 8 66.67 2 2 2 6 75.00 1 1 2 66.67 1 1 33.33 1960 Vietnam 204 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 Vietnam 204 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 Vietnam 204 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1990 Vietnam 204 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 3 3 100.00 2000 Vietnam 204 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 3 3 100.00 2009 Vietnam 204 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100.00 1960 Yemen, Rep. 207 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1970 Yemen, Rep. 207 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1980 Yemen, Rep. 207 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1990 Yemen, Rep. 207 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1 1 33.33 2000 Yemen, Rep. 207 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 2009 Yemen, Rep. 207 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 2 2 66.67 1960 Zambia 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 1 2 66.67 2 2 66.67 1970 Zambia 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1980 Zambia 208 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1990 Zambia 208 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2000 Zambia 208 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 2009 Zambia 208 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 71.43 2 2 2 3 3 12 100.00 2 3 3 8 100.00 1 1 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 1960 Zimbabwe 209 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1970 Zimbabwe 209 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14.29 1980 Zimbabwe 209 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 1990 Zimbabwe 209 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 3 3 100.00 2000 Zimbabwe 209 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 3 3 100.00 2009 Zimbabwe 209 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 57.14 3 3 100.00

1. Boland R (1974-) Annual Review of Population Law. Boston. 2. Kellogg EH, Kline DKja, Stepan Jja (1975) The world's laws and practices on population and sexuality education. Medford, Mass.: Law and Population Programme, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University. vi, 127 p. p. 3. Stepan J, Kellogg EH (1974) The World's Laws on Contraceptives. Law and Population Monograph Series 17. 4. United Nations Fund for Population Activities, International Advisory Committee on Population and Law, United Nations Population Fund, School HL (1978-1994) Annual Review of Population Law. Law and Population Monograph Series. 5. Rahman A, Katzive L, Henshaw SK (1998) A global review of laws on induced abortion, 1985-1997. International Family Planning Perspectives 24: 56-64. 6. Bjorklund A (2006) Does family policy affect fertility? Lessons from Sweden. Journal of Population Economics 19: 3-24. 7. Bongaarts J (1994) The Impact of Population Policies: Comment. Population and Development Review 20: 616-620. 8. Farley JU, Samuel SJ (1981) Potential Impact on Birth Rates of Reforms in Laws Governing Contraceptive Marketing. Policy Science 13: 439- 458. 9. Foster A, Roy N (1997) The dynamics of education and fertility: evidence from a family planning experiment. 10. Klerman JA (1999) U.S. Abortion Policy and Fertility The American Economic Review 89: 261-264. 11. Levine PB, Staiger D, Kane TJ, Zimmerman DJ (1999) Roe v Wade and American fertility. American Journal of Public Health 89: 199-203. 12. McDonald P (2006) Low Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy. Population and Development Review 32: 485-510. 13. Molyneaux JW, Gertler PJ (2000) The Impact of Targeted Family Planning in Indonesia. Population and Development Review 26: 61-85. 14. Ross J, Stover J (2001) The family planning program effort index: 1999 cycle. International Family Planning Perspectives 27: 119-129. 15. United Nations Population Division (2003) Fertility, contraception and population policies. United Nations 16. Knowles JC, Akin JS, Guilkey DK (1994) The Impact of Population Policies - Comment. Population and Development Review 20: 611-615. 17. Pritchett L (1994a) Desired Fertility and the Impact of Population Policies. Population and Development Review 20: 1-55. 18. Pritchett L (1994b) The Impact of Population Policies: Reply. Population and Development Review 20: 621-630. 19. Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (May 2001) Penn World Table Version 7.0. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania. 20. Ross J, Stover J, Adelaja D (2007) Family Planning Programs in 2004: New Assessments in a Changing Environment. International Family Planning Perspectives 33: 22-30. 21. Boland R (2002) Chapter 4. Law and Policy. In: EngenderHealth, editor. Contraceptive Sterilization: Global Issues and Trends. New York: EngenderHealth. 22. Secretariat UN (2002) Abortion Policies: A Global Review Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs: The Population Policy Data Bank. 23. (1976) Survey of contraceptive laws: country profiles, checklists, and summaries: United Nations Fund for Population Activities. 24. Ross JA, Hong S, Huber DH (1985) Voluntary Sterilzation: An International Fact Book: Association for Voluntary Sterilization. 25. (2010) Fertility rate, total. World Development Indicators & Global Development Finance.

26. Goujon A, Samir KC, Lutz W, Sanderson W (2000) Education, Reconstruction and Projections. IIASA World Population Program and Vienna Institute of Demography (VID). 27. Teorell J, Nicholas Charron, Marcus Samanni, Sören Holmberg & Bo Rothstein (2011) The Quality of Government Dataset, version 6Apr11. The Quality of Government Institute. 28. (1995) Worldmark Encyclopedia of the Nations. 8th ed. Detroit: Gale Research. 29. (1996) CIA World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 30. Barrett D (1982) World Christian Encyclopedia: a Comparative Study of Churches and Religions in the Modern World, AD 1900-2000. New York: Oxford University Press. 31. Bernard M, Reenock C, Nordstrom T (2004) The Legacy of Western Overseas Colonialism on Democratic Survival. International Studies Quarterly 48: 225-250. 32. Zerai A, Tsui A (2001) The Relationship between Prenatal Care and Subsequent Modern Contraceptive use in Bolivia, Egypt and Thailand. African Journal of Reproductive Health 5: 68-82. 33. Valente TW, Saba WP (2001) Campaign exposure and interpersonal communication as factors in contraceptive use in Bolivia. Journal of Health Communication 6: 303-322. 34. Snyder N (1974) Bolivia Firms up Plans to Launch Nation’s First Family Planning Effort. Population Dynamics Quarterly 2: 1. 35. Maccorquodale DW, Cisneros AG, Measham AR (1975) How Doctors in Bolivia and Philippines View Sterilization. Studies in Family Planning 6: 426-428. 36. McNamee CB (2009) Wanted and Unwanted Fertility in Bolivia: Does Ethnicity Matter? International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 35: 166-175. 37. Paulson S, Bailey P (2003) Culturally Constructed Relationships Shape Sexual and Reproductive Health in Bolivia. Culture, Health and Sexuality 5: 483-498. 38. (2009) Encuesta Nacional de Demografía y Salud. La Paz, Bolivia: Ministerio de Salud y Deportes&InstitutoNacional de Estadística

39. (2003) Women of the World: Laws and Policies Affecting their Reproductive Lives – East Central Europe.: Center for Reproductive Rights. 40. Westoff C (2003) Executive Summary- Recent Trends in Abortion and Contraception in Twelve Countries. Office of Population Research, Princeton University. 41. Levine PB, Staiger D (2004) Abortion Policy and Fertility Outcomes: The Eastern European Experience. Journal of Law and Economics 157: 223-243. 42. Henshaw SK, Singh S, Haas T (1999) The incidence of abortion worldwide. International Family Planning Perspectives 25: S30-S38.