DOCSLIB.ORG

The Tui Mines: a Portion of the Te Aroha Mining District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Tui Mines: a Portion of the Te Aroha Mining District THE TUI MINES: A PORTION OF THE TE AROHA MINING DISTRICT Philip Hart Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers No. 107 2016 Historical Research Unit Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand ISSN: 2463-6266 © 2016 Philip Hart Contact: [email protected] 1 THE TUI MINES: A PORTION OF THE TE AROHA MINING DISTRICT Abstract: After initial interest in it during the initial rush, the Tui portion of the Te Aroha field was largely ignored until Clem Cornes made a discovery in 1885 that produced great hopes for obtaining gold and silver. Investors were quickly interested, but raising sufficient capital was a continual problem; although in time British investors became involved, all the syndicates and companies were under-funded. In addition, there was no agreed method to treat the refractory ore, which was heavily impregnated with base metals, and several processes were tried without success. In addition, the topography of the area required the construction of an access track and, in 1889, of an aerial tramway to transport ore from high on the mountain to the flat. As usual, financial assistance from both local and national governments was sought, and a small amount was received. Many people were involved as prospectors, miners, investors, and treatment ‘experts’, but despite their efforts the early hopes were never fulfilled. By mid-1888 mining had faded because of the lack of a successful process, and although some London-based companies would be formed in later years, capital remained inadequate and development was minimal, for the basic reason that no suitable treatment had been discovered for the low- grade and complex ore. FIRST EXPLORATIONS During the Te Aroha rush, several claims were taken up in the Tui district, to the northwest of the settlement.1 Partly because of the alarm created by the murder of Himiona Haira,2 but mainly because there was little ore close to the flat land, by mid-1881 almost all prospecting ceased. After the original Tui claim was forfeited in January 1882,3 four claims were taken up on 30 August that year and another on 1 September.4 1 See paper on the Te Aroha goldfield from its opening until Christmas 1880. 2 See paper on mining at Te Aroha before the murder in February 1881. 3 Waikato Times, 31 January 1882, p. 2. 4 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folios 258-262, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A. 2 Charles Henry Wilson, formerly a miner at Thames and Waitekauri,5 who had participated in the Te Aroha rush,6 was sole owner of the Royal Standard, which he abandoned on 19 September.7 Alfred Newdick, another early Thames miner,8 who had no previous involvement with mining at Te Aroha, was sole owner of the Black Prince Nos. 1-3.9 John Ryan, a farmer who had participated in the Te Aroha rush,10 and William John Lyons, a miner who earlier had acquired shares in five Waiorongomai claims and two companies,11 owned the Three Mates (the third mate, if one existed, was not listed).12 These four claims were all declared abandoned on 30 July 1883. All were close to the flat; the south-western peg of Wilson’s claim was about 300 yards from the edge of the bush, and the Black Prince No. 2, to its south, was about quarter of a mile from a slaughterhouse.13 Only two claims were taken up in 1883, when on 4 December William Gibbons, a miner who for part of that year worked as a tramway hand,14 and Charles Henry Albert Tonge, a carpenter, contractor, and 5 See Thames Advertiser, 7 October 1876, p. 3, 20 October 1877, p. 2, 29 October 1877, p. 3, 12 July 1880, p. 2, 30 July 1881, p. 3, 4 April 1889, p. 2. 6 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Miner’s Right no. 614, issued 25 November 1880, Miners’ Rights Butt Book 1880, BBAV 11533/1e; Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folios 176, 199, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A. 7 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folio 258, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A. 8 See New Zealand Herald, 14 February 1923, p. 3; Observer, 8 May 1930, p. 4. 9 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folios 259-261, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A. 10 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Miner’s Right no. 562, issued 29 November 1880, Miners’ Rights Butt Book 1880, BBAV 11533/1d; Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folio 172, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A; New Zealand Mining Standard, 27 February 1897, p. 5; Te Aroha News, 23 March 1917, p. 2, 23 January 1929, p. 4. 11 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Licensed Holdings 1881-1887, folios 3, 6, 13, 55, 88, BBAV 11500/9a, ANZ-A; New Zealand Gazette, 10 August 1882, p. 1101, 17 August 1882, p. 1132. 12 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folio 262, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A. 13 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folios 258, 259, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A. 14 Te Aroha News, 16 June 1883, p. 2. 3 boardinghouse keeper,15 registered the Junction and Odd Whim.16 Two miners, Thomas Stewart Potts17 and Thomas Redmond,18 were Tonge’s partners in the Odd Whim.19 Both claims were declared abandoned on 24 November the following year; that they were recorded as being near the Waiwera claim20 indicated that others had pegged out but not registered their claims (not all notices of pegging out have survived). THE 1885 DISCOVERY In mid-September 1885, a Te Aroha correspondent reported excitement caused by a rumour of rich silver stone being discovered in an area ‘which used to be such a favourite part of the field during the first rush’; much pegging out was taking place.21 A week and a half later, he reported that the prospector, Clement Augustus Cornes,22 having found good gold at the head of the Tui Creek on the top of the main range, had pegged out three claims. As the initial tests were encouraging, the reef reportedly being similar to reefs at Karangahake, other miners took up another five claims. ‘Several influential men in Auckland’ were interested in the discovery.23 Another correspondent considered the discovery was 15 See Te Aroha News, Magistrate’s Court, 29 September 1883, p.2, Warden’s Court, 24 November 1883, p. 3, 15 March 1884, p. 2, 5 April 1884, p. 7, 4 December 1888, p. 2. 16 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folios 312, 313, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A. 17 See Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folios 196, 209, 222, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A; Auckland Weekly News, 2 April 1881, p. 20; Warden’s Court, Te Aroha News, 24 November 1883, p. 3. 18 See Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folios 35, 205, 248, 300, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A; Armed Constabulary Force, Report on Charges taken at Te Aroha Lock-up 1880-1903, no. 16, in private possession; Warden’s Court, Te Aroha News, 24 November 1883, p. 3. 19 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folio 313, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A. 20 Te Aroha Warden’s Court, Register of Te Aroha Claims 1880-1888, folios 312, 313, BBAV 11567/1a, ANZ-A. 21 Te Aroha Correspondent, Thames Advertiser, 14 September 1885, p. 3. 22 See paper on his life. 23 Te Aroha Correspondent, Thames Advertiser, 25 September 1885, p. 3. 4 certainly one of great promise, and present appearances justify the high hopes that are entertained, for without doubt the lode in its general statistics looks exceedingly favourable for both gold and silver and surpasses anything yet found on this side of the range. The outcrop can be traced some hundreds of yards and wherever broken into it shows stone of a most kindly quality. The average width of the reef was five feet. Being in very rough country, the area was previously unknown to all ‘save very few’, and no large trial of the ore was possible, for pack horses could not get within a mile of it; ‘everything will have to be carried on men’s backs’. Small trials were being made, and samples had been ‘taken from different parts of the reef by a gentleman from Auckland’ who was ‘in treaty with the discoverers for the purchase of a large interest’. Should the assay returns be ‘as good as those said to have been obtained by the prospectors, the property will indeed be a most valuable one’.24 On the same day, the local newspaper published its first article on the ‘Valuable Find’: The sensation of the week in mining matters here has been the discovery of a large reef, supposed to contain the precious metals in highly payable quantity, at the summit of the main range near the head of the Tui Creek. It was whispered about early in the week that an important find had been made, and the appearance in the township of an old prospector and former resident here, tended to confirm the belief, but it was not till Wednesday evening [23 September] that the precise locality became generally known. The discoverers had then completed the pegging of the ground and, having given the necessary notice of marking out, were less reticent regarding the whereabouts of the reef, and the prospects they had obtained.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Epithermal Gold Mines
    Mine Environment Life-cycle Guide: epithermal gold mines Authors JE Cavanagh1, J Pope2, R Simcock1, JS Harding3, D Trumm2, D Craw4, P Weber5, J Webster-Brown6, F Eppink1 , K Simon7 1 Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research 2 CRL Energy 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury 4 School of Geological Sciences, University of Otago 5 O’Kane Consulting 6 Waterways Centre 7 School of Environment, University of Auckland © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd and CRL Energy Ltd 2018 This information may be copied or reproduced electronically and distributed to others without limitation, provided Landcare Research New Zealand Limited and CRL Energy Limited are acknowledged as the source of information. Under no circumstances may a charge be made for this information without the express permission of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited and CRL Energy Limited. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Mine Environment Life-cycle Guide series extends the New Zealand Minerals Sector Environmental Framework previously developed by Landcare Research (as Contract Report LC2033), CRL Energy, and the Universities of Canterbury and Otago, in conjunction with end-users including the Department of Conservation, the West Coast Regional Council, Environment Southland, Solid Energy, OceanaGold, Francis Mining, Bathurst Resources, Newmont, Waikato Regional Council, and the Tui Mine Iwi Advisory Group. Contributors to the previous framework also included Craig Ross. The Mine Environment Life-cycle Guide has been developed with input from end-users including the Department of Conservation, Straterra, West Coast Regional Council, Waikato Regional Council, Northland Regional Council, New Zealand Coal and Carbon, OceanaGold, Bathurst Resources, Solid Energy New Zealand, Tui Mine Iwi Advisory Group – in particular Pauline Clarkin, Ngātiwai Trust Board, Ngāi Tahu, and Minerals West Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato CMS Volume I
    CMS CONSERVATioN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Waikato 2014–2024, Volume I Operative 29 September 2014 CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY WAIKATO 2014–2024, Volume I Operative 29 September 2014 Cover image: Rider on the Timber Trail, Pureora Forest Park. Photo: DOC September 2014, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 978-0-478-15021-6 (print) ISBN 978-0-478-15023-0 (online) This document is protected by copyright owned by the Department of Conservation on behalf of the Crown. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items or collections of content, this copyright material is licensed for re- use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. In essence, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the material, as long as you attribute it to the Department of Conservation and abide by the other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/nz/ This publication is produced using paper sourced from well-managed, renewable and legally logged forests. Contents Foreword 7 Introduction 8 Purpose of conservation management strategies 8 CMS structure 10 CMS term 10 Relationship with other Department of Conservation strategic documents and tools 10 Relationship with other planning processes 11 Legislative tools 12 Exemption from land use consents 12 Closure of areas 12 Bylaws and regulations 12 Conservation management plans 12 International obligations 13 Part One 14 1 The Department of Conservation in Waikato 14 2 Vision for Waikato—2064 14 2.1 Long-term vision for Waikato—2064 15 3 Distinctive
    [Show full text]
  • TE AROHA in the 1890S Philip Hart
    TE AROHA IN THE 1890s Philip Hart Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers No. 115 2016 Historical Research Unit Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand ISSN: 2463-6266 © 2016 Philip Hart Contact: [email protected] 1 TE AROHA IN THE 1890s Abstract: During the 1890s the town slowly increased in size and became economically stronger despite mining, for most of this decade, no longer flourishing. Other occupations became more important, with farming and tending to the needs of tourists being pre-eminent. Residents continued to grumble over the need for improvements, the cost of housing, high rents, and a poor system of tenure, but the establishment of a borough meant that some more improvements could be provided. As the town developed the poor- quality buildings hastily erected in its early days were seen as disfiguring it, and gradually the streets and footpaths were improved. As previously, storms and fires were notable experiences, the latter revealing the need for a water supply and fire fighting equipment. And also as previously, there were many ways to enliven small town life in mostly respectable ways, notably the library, clubs, sports, horse racing, the Volunteers, and entertainments of all kinds, details of which illustrate the texture of social life. Despite disparaging remarks by outsiders, living at Te Aroha need not be as dull as was claimed. POPULATION The census taken on 5 April 1891 recorded 615 residents, 307 males and 308 females, in the town district.1 The electoral roll of June revealed that miners remained the largest group: 19, plus two mine managers.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017/18 Adopted 10 October 2018 Statement of Compliance
    Annual Report 2017/18 Adopted 10 October 2018 Statement of Compliance Compliance The Council and management of Matamata-Piako District Council confirm that all statutory requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 have been complied with in relation to the preparation of this Annual Report. Responsibility The Council and management of Matamata-Piako District Council accept: • responsibility for the preparation of the annual Financial Statements and the judgements used in them. • responsibility for establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of financial reporting. In the opinion of the Council and management of Matamata-Piako District Council, the Financial Statements for the period ended 30 June 2018 fairly reflect the financial position and operations of the Matamata-Piako District Council. Janet E Barnes, Mayor Don McLeod, Chief Executive Officer ISSN 1171-3917 (Print) ISSN 1175-7299 (Online) ISSN 2463-4271 (CD-ROM) = Contents Part One: Introduction › Message from the Mayor .........................................................................................................4 › Council ............................................................................................................................................ 5 › Independent Auditor’s Report ..............................................................................................6 › Financial summary .....................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Te Aroha Mining District
    THE GEOLOGY OF THE TE AROHA MINING DISTRICT Philip Hart Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers No. 2 2016 Historical Research Unit Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand ISSN: 2463-6266 © 2016 Philip Hart Contact: [email protected] 1 THE GEOLOGY OF THE TE AROHA MINING DISTRICT Abstract: When gold was discovered on the slopes of Te Aroha mountain, its geology was unknown to geologists and miners alike. After initial hasty examinations, later investigations produced more reliable details, and by late in the twentieth century much more detailed and technical information was available. Originally, prospectors hoped to find alluvial gold, but instead discovered that, through volcanic action, the minerals permeated the quartz. Despite intensive prospecting, payable ore was rarely found. At Waiorongomai, the large main lode was mostly a buck reef, the best patches of ore being found where it abutted side reefs. Hopes for a prosperous field soon faded because the various battery processes were unable to treat the ore profitably, a failure largely explained by its poverty and complexity. The output from the Te Aroha district proved to be one of the lowest of the Hauraki fields. PUZZLING OVER THE ORE According to the government geologist, Alexander McKay,1 On the discovery of gold at the Thames many who were not miners in any sense of the term had to engage in the active work of mining or necessarily abandon their holdings; but as usually an experienced miner formed one of the party, or the service of such might be engaged, under such conditions mining was carried on till definite registered companies directed by an experienced manager were formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral, Coal and Petroleum Resources: Production,Exploration and Potential
    2.3 MINERAL, COAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES MINERAL, COAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES: PRODUCTION, EXPLORATION AND POTENTIAL Anthony B. Christie1, Richard G. Barker2 1 GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand 2 Consulting Geologist, PO Box 54-094, The Marina, Bucklands Beach, Auckland 2144, New Zealand ABSTRACT: New Zealand has been a signifi cant producer of minerals and coal since early European settlement in the mid-19th century, and of hydrocarbons since 1970. Current production consists of oil, gold and silver, high quality (bituminous) coal, ironsand and specialised industrial minerals such as halloysite china clay for export, and a range of minerals and rocks for domestic use that are fundamental to New Zealand’s economy and infrastructure. The latter include aggregate for road making and construction (concrete aggregate and cement), coal for use by industry and electricity generation, and limestone for agriculture, cement making, and industry. Small quantities of diatomite, dolomite, perlite, pumice, serpentinite, and zeolite are also produced mainly for domestic markets. Other commodities that have been produced in the past include antimony, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, phosphate, platinum, sulphur, tin, tungsten, and zinc. New Zealand has well-documented potential for the discovery of a wide range of minerals and of petroleum, both onshore and offshore. Exploration is essential for converting this resource potential to wealth-creating assets. The resource-related industries are signifi cant economic contributors, but New Zealand’s resource potential remains to be realised. Mineral resources are created by natural processes and are generally described as non-renewable, implying they are fi nite, but many minerals (metals in particular) have been produced for several thousand years.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollution in the Te Aroha District Caused by Mining
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Commons@Waikato POLLUTION IN THE TE AROHA DISTRICT CAUSED BY MINING Philip Hart Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers No. 6 2016 Historical Research Unit Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand ISSN: 2463-6266 © 2016 Philip Hart Contact: [email protected] 1 POLLUTION IN THE TE AROHA DISTRICT CAUSED BY MINING Abstract: Whereas miners (and their supporters in the Mines Department) felt constrained by the imposition of environmental controls, many Te Aroha residents were concerned about the purity of their domestic water supply, although a vocal minority was more interested in the possibilities of jobs and money. As mullock and tailings were unavoidable consequences of mining, when farmers had fine silt deposited on their land they combined with town-dwellers to seek the removal of the designation of the Waihou River as a sludge channel. Efforts to revive mining during the depression of the 1930s revived concerns about pollution, and in the following decade the Auckland Smelting Company’s efforts to develop the Tui portion of the field provoked considerable debate about protecting Te Aroha’s water supply amongst officials and within the community. The warden, encouraged by departmental officials, permitted mining, but imposed conditions that its opponents considered to be inadequate and which the company sought to evade. THE IMPACT OF MINING There has always been a tension between miners and community groups because of mining’s impacts, especially environmental. By the mid- twentieth century, when the goldmining industry was nearly extinct, supporters of mining felt beleaguered by both public and official attitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Ordinary Meeting of The
    Corporate and Operations Committee Open Agenda Notice is hereby given that an ordinary meeting of the Corporate and Operations Committee will be held on: Date: Wednesday 24 October 2018 Time: 9:00am Venue: Council Chambers 35 Kenrick Street TE AROHA Membership Mayor Jan Barnes, JP Councillors Donna Arnold James Sainsbury Teena Cornes Ash Tanner Paul Cronin Kevin Tappin Neil Goodger James Thomas, JP Brian Hunter Adrienne Wilcock Peter Jager Phone: 07-884-0060 Address: PO Box 266, Te Aroha 3342 Email: [email protected] Website: www.mpdc.govt.nz Corporate and Operations Committee 24 October 2018 ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PROCEDURAL 1 Meeting Opening 5 2 Present 5 3 Apologies 5 4 Notification of Urgent Business 5 5 Confirmation of minutes 5 OFFICER REPORTS 6 Executive 6.1 Volunteer Youth Ambassadors 2018 7 6.2 Digital Strategy 9 6.3 Future Matamata Stadium - Feasibility and Site Assessment 13 6.4 Funding for the proposed Morrinsville Carpark at the end of Ron Ladd Place in Morrinsville 69 6.5 Naming of Reserve in Morrinsville 73 6.6 Amendment of Road Naming Policy 79 6.7 Road Naming off Florence Drive in Morrinsville 87 6.8 Road Naming Ancroft Subdivision in Matamata 91 6.9 Enviroschools Presentation 97 6.10 Community Grants 2018/19 First funding round 105 6.11 Annual Declarations Of Interest 111 6.12 2017/18 State of the Environment Report 113 6.13 Health and Safety Report - September 2018 117 6.14 Waste Minimisation Report 141 6.15 Chief Executive Officers Report - September 2018 157 7 Urgent Additional Business PUBLIC EXCLUDED 8 Procedural motion to exclude the public 203 C1 Office of Treaty Settlement - Easement Request Page 3 Corporate and Operations Committee 24 October 2018 1 Meeting Opening 2 Present 3 Apologies At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
    [Show full text]
  • Matamata-Piako District Council Is Fortunate Enough to Be a Land Locked District
    MATAMATA PIAKO MŌHIOHIO ANŌ MŌ TE RAPU WHAKAARO KI TE RAUTAKINGA TŪROA 2021-2031 | UNDERLYING INFORMATION FOR CONSULTATION ON THE LONG TERM PLAN 2021 - 2031 CONTENTS YOUR PAGE FINDER 4 SECTION 1: HE KUPU WHAKATAKI | INTRODUCTION 12 SECTION 2: RAUTAKI Ā -PŪTEA | FINANCIAL STRATEGY 33 SECTION 3: RAUTAKI Ā-HANGANGA | INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY 69 SECTION 4: NGĀ WHAKATATAU MATUA | KEY ASSUMPTIONS 69 SECTION 5: TŌ TĀTOU ROHE, ŌHANGA, TAUPORI HOKI | OUR District, ECONOMY AND POPULATION 79 SECTION 6: Ā MĀTOU MAHI | WHAT WE DO 232 SECTION 7: TE PŪTEA | FINANCIALS 268 SECTION 8: NGĀ KAUPAPAHERE | POLICIES 280 SECTION 9: NGĀ WHAKAWHANAUNGATANGA MATUA | KEY RELATIONSHIPS 290 SECTION 10: TE AROTAKENGA | AUDIT OPINION ISSN 1170-5779 (Print) ISSN 1178-9735 (Online) HE KUPU WHAKATAKI INTRODUCTION SECTION 1: HE KUPU WHAKATAKI | INTRODUCTION 5 WELCOME A MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR Council has been working on a plan for the next 10 years for several We’re tackling the issues, but we also have some really exciting months, taking a hard look at what needs to be done to help our proposals included over the next 10 years, like revitalising our district move forward. main streets, and planning ahead for recreation facilities - including an additional indoor stadium for Matamata and re-development of Council signed off the LTP and consultation document for public the Morrinsville pool. Projects that will help make our community a consultation, with a total rates increase in the first year of 11.85%. more vibrant, thriving place. This means Council would collect 11.85% more from rates than in We’re also proposing to develop a new day spa in Te Aroha, starting 2020/21, but 1.5% of that is expected to be covered by new ratepayers, with a plan that will allow us to stage the project in a cost effective as the district is continuing to experience strong growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Plan 2016/17
    Annual Plan 2016/17 Adopted 22 June 2016 ISSN 1170-5779 (Print) ISSN 1178-9735 (Online) ISSN 2463-4344 (CD-ROM) Contents Part One: Introduction › Message from the Mayor ......................................................................................................... 5 › Your Council ................................................................................................................................6 › Annual Plan guide .....................................................................................................................8 › So what’s changed from the Long Term Plan .................................................................9 › Revaluations .............................................................................................................................. 10 › Uniform Annual General Charge (UAGC) ....................................................................... 14 › Now the important question.... What will my rates be? ..............................................17 › Consultation ................................................................................................................................18 › Your district today ....................................................................................................................19 Part Two: What we do › Community Facilities and Property...................................................................................22 › Strategy and Engagement ....................................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Pollution in the Te Aroha District Caused by Mining
    POLLUTION IN THE TE AROHA DISTRICT CAUSED BY MINING Philip Hart Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers No. 6 2016 Historical Research Unit Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand ISSN: 2463-6266 © 2016 Philip Hart Contact: [email protected] 1 POLLUTION IN THE TE AROHA DISTRICT CAUSED BY MINING Abstract: Whereas miners (and their supporters in the Mines Department) felt constrained by the imposition of environmental controls, many Te Aroha residents were concerned about the purity of their domestic water supply, although a vocal minority was more interested in the possibilities of jobs and money. As mullock and tailings were unavoidable consequences of mining, when farmers had fine silt deposited on their land they combined with town-dwellers to seek the removal of the designation of the Waihou River as a sludge channel. Efforts to revive mining during the depression of the 1930s revived concerns about pollution, and in the following decade the Auckland Smelting Company’s efforts to develop the Tui portion of the field provoked considerable debate about protecting Te Aroha’s water supply amongst officials and within the community. The warden, encouraged by departmental officials, permitted mining, but imposed conditions that its opponents considered to be inadequate and which the company sought to evade. THE IMPACT OF MINING There has always been a tension between miners and community groups because of mining’s impacts, especially environmental. By the mid- twentieth century, when the goldmining industry was nearly extinct, supporters of mining felt beleaguered by both public and official attitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Pest Plants
    APPENDIX 1 CATCHMENT-BASED ECOLOGICAL OVERVIEWS © Crown Copyright 2010 190 Contract Report No. 2075 1. WAIHI 1.1 Waterways Description Forty-three percent (43%) of the waterways in the Waihi catchment flow through high gradient landforms, more than one third through low gradient landforms, the remaining fifth are in medium gradient landforms. The land cover adjoining streams is divided nearly equally between pastoral grassland (52.3%) and indigenous vegetation (45.5%). There are three times the length of pastoral grassland adjacent waterways in low gradient landforms as high gradient landforms. Table 1.1: Summary of stream length and soil types and land cover within Waihi catchment. Valley Landform Low High Medium Length in Geology Landcover Gradient Gradient Gradient (km) Kilometres (km) (km) Volcanic Bare ground 0.5 (0.6%) 0.6 (1.2%) 1.1 (0.5%) acidic Indigenous 15.3 (17.9%) 16.7 (35.0%) 75.1 (73.8%) 107.1 (45.5%) forest Pastoral 69.7 (81.5%) 30.5 (63.8%) 22.7 (22.3%) 123.0 (52.3%) Scrub 3.5 (3.5%) 3.5 (1.4%) Urban 0.4 (0.4%) 0.4 (0.2%) Total 85.5 (36.4%) 47.8 (20.3%) 101.8 (43.3%) 235.2 Rivers and Streams Within the Catchment The Ohinemuri is the main waterway, with the following tributaries: Waione Ruahorahora Taiari Waitawheta Mangakino Water Quality Water quality is monitored at four sites within the Ohinemuri catchment. Ammonia and turbidity scores are mostly excellent, total phosphorus levels are satisfactory, but total nitrogen levels are mostly unacceptable. Quality indicators for contact recreation score excellent to satisfactory in c.90% of measurements.
    [Show full text]