DOCSLIB.ORG

3386 Guinea-Bissau SLM Terminal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3386 Guinea-Bissau SLM Terminal La REPUBLIC OF GUINEA-BISSAU MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES (MAF) ------------------------ Support to the Building of Guinea-Bissau’s National Capacity in Sustainable Land Management and Desertification Control FINAL EVALUATION OF THE CAPACITY BUILDING PROJECT IN SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT AND DESERTIFICATION CONTROL Final Version Consultants Roger SOUBEIGA, Socio - Economist January 2013 and Project Analyst 0 6 B P : 9 3 1 7 Table of Contents COVER PAGE ................................................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 5 ACRYNOYMS AND ABREVIATIONS................................................................................................. 9 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Objective...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Scope of activity and method ...................................................................................................... 10 1.2.1 Scope of activity ................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Method ................................................................................................................................. 10 1.3 Difficulties Encountered and Limits of the Study .................................................................... 11 1.3.1 Difficulties Encountered ....................................................................................................... 11 1.3.2 Limits of the study ................................................................................................................ 11 1.4 Structure of the evaluation report .............................................................................................. 11 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ........................................................ 12 2.1 Start of Project and Duration ...................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Problems that the Project Sought to Address ............................................................................. 12 2.3 Immediate and Development Objectives of the Project ............................................................. 12 2.3.1 Development Objective ........................................................................................................ 12 2.3.2 Immediate Objective ............................................................................................................ 12 2.4 Established Reference Indicators ................................................................................................ 12 2.5 Principal Stakeholders ................................................................................................................. 13 2.6 Expected results .......................................................................................................................... 13 3. OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 13 3.1 Project design/formulation ......................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Analysis of the Logical Framework Approach of the Project ............................................... 13 3.1.2 Assumptions and risks .......................................................................................................... 14 3.1.3 Lessons from other similar projects that were integrated into project design ................... 15 3.1.4 Planned participation of stakeholders ................................................................................. 15 3.1.5 Approach for replication ...................................................................................................... 16 3.1.6 UNDP’s comparative advantage ........................................................................................... 16 3.1.7 Linkages between the project and other interventions within the sector .......................... 16 3.1.8 Management provisions ....................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Project Implementation .............................................................................................................. 17 3.2.1 Adaptive Management .................................................................................................. 17 3.2.2 Partnership Agreements....................................................................................................... 17 3.2.3 Feedback on Monitoring-Evaluation Activities for Adaptive Management ......................... 18 3.2.4 Project Finance ..................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.5 Monitoring and Evaluation: Design at Entry and Implementation ...................................... 18 3.2.6 UNDP and Executing Agency implementation, execution, coordination and operations ... 19 3.3 Analysis of Project Results and Performance .............................................................................. 20 ~ 2 ~ 3.3.1 Analysis of the overall results ............................................................................................... 20 3.3.2 Relevance ............................................................................................................................. 26 3.3.3 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................................... 27 3.3.4 Efficiency .............................................................................................................................. 30 3.3.5 Country Ownership .............................................................................................................. 32 3.3.6 Mainstreaming ..................................................................................................................... 32 3.3.7 Catalytic role and impacts .................................................................................................... 33 3.3.8 Sustainability ........................................................................................................................ 36 5. CONCLUSIONS, LESSONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 38 5.1 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................. 38 5.2 Lessons learnt .............................................................................................................................. 38 5.3 Recommendations....................................................................................................................... 39 6. ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................ 41 6.1 Annex 1: UNDP-GEF Terms of Reference for Final Evaluation .................................................... 41 6.2 Annex 2: Some Characteristics of the Samples ........................................................................... 58 6.3 Annex 3: Other Tables of Analysis ............................................................................................... 62 6.4 Annex 4: Itinerary ........................................................................................................................ 63 6.5 Annex 5: List of Persons Interviewed .......................................................................................... 64 6.6 Annex 6: Summary of Field Visits ................................................................................................ 66 6.7 Annex 7: List of Documents Reviewed ........................................................................................ 67 6.8 Annex 8: Questionnaires Used and Summary of Results ............................................................ 68 6.9 Annex 9 : Formulaire d’accord du consultant d’évaluation ........................................................ 69 6.10 Annex 10: Evaluation Report Clearance Form .......................................................................... 69 ~ 3 ~ COVER PAGE Name of project UNDP/GEF: Support to the Building of Technical, Human and Financial Capacity in Sustainable Land Management and the Fight against Desertification in Guinea-Bissau Project ID UNDP and GEF: GNB 00043166 and PIMS 3386 and GEF ID (PMIS) 3481 Evaluation schedule and date of evaluation report: from 19 November to 20 December 2012 Regions and countries included in the report: Africa, Guinea-Bissau GEF Operational Programme / strategic programme: Land degradation OP 15/SP 1 Building of targeted capacities Executing agency and project partners: Government of Guinea-Bissau via the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (ex-Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development), PRESAR-BAD, CILSS, Government of Portugal Members of Evaluation Team: Roger SOUBEIGA, international consultant and team leader, and Alfonso Ildo LOPES, national consultant Acknowledgements: The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lista Dos Deputados Eleitos
    LISTA DOS DEPUTADOS ELEITOS ORDEM PARTIDO DA CE CANDIDATOS A DEPUTADOS ELEITOS SECTOR REGIÃO POLÍTICO ELEIÇÃO POR CE 01 PRS ORLANDO MENDES VIEGAS CATIÓ; KOMO TOMBALI 1º 01 PAIGC DAN IALA N'CANHA BARANÇÃO CATIÓ; KOMO TOMBALI 2º 01 MADEM G.-15 MAMA SELO DJALÓ CATIÓ; KOMO TOMBALI 3º 02 PRS FÉLIX BULUTNA NANDUNGUÉ BEDANDA; CACINE; QUEBO TOMBALI 1º 02 PAIGC HIGINO CARDOSO BEDANDA; CACINE; QUEBO TOMBALI 2º 02 MADEM G.-15 MARCIANO ALVARENGA VAZ BEDANDA; CACINE; QUEBO TOMBALI 3º 02 PRS SOLA NQUILIN NABITCHITA BEDANDA; CACINE; QUEBO TOMBALI 4º 03 PAIGC MAMADI BALDÉ BUBA; EMPADA QUINARA 1º 03 MADEM G.-15 SATU CAMARÁ PINTO BUBA; EMPADA QUINARA 2º 03 PRS JORGE MALÚ BUBA; EMPADA QUINARA 3º 04 PRS NICOLAU DOS SANTOS FULACUNDA; TITE QUINARA 1º 04 PAIGC JOANA INÁCIA GOMES FULACUNDA; TITE QUINARA 2º 04 MADEM G.-15 MAMADÚ SERIFO DJAQUITÉ FULACUNDA; TITE QUINARA 3º 05 APU-PDGB NUNO GOMES NABIAM BISSORÃ OIO 1º 05 PAIGC WASNA PAPAI DANFÁ BISSORÃ OIO 2º 05 PRS ADRIANA BATICÃ FERREIRA BISSORÃ OIO 3º 05 APU-PDGB UMARO CONTÉ BISSORÃ OIO 4º 05 MADEM G.-15 MANUEL IRÉNIO NASCIMENTO DA COSTA BISSORÃ OIO 5º 06 PAIGC JOÃO SEIDEBA SANÉ FARIM OIO 1º 06 PAIGC JOSÉ ANTÓNIO DA CRUZ ALMEIDA FARIM OIO 2º 06 MADEM G.-15 JORGE ANIBAL PEREIRA FARIM OIO 3º 06 PAIGC BRAIMA DJALÓ FARIM OIO 4º 07 MADEM G.-15 BAMBA BANJAI MANSABA OIO 1º 07 PAIGC LÁSSANA SEIDI MANSABA OIO 2º 07 MADEM G.-15 NHALIM SANÓ MANSABA OIO 3º 08 PRS ALBERTO MBUNHE NAMBEIA MANSOA; NHACRA OIO 1º 08 PAIGC PAPA MANÉ MANSOA; NHACRA OIO 2º 08 PRS SERIFO DJALÓ MANSOA; NHACRA OIO 3º 08 APU-PDGB PAULO BODJAN MANSOA; NHACRA OIO 4º 09 PAIGC GABRIELA FERNANDES QUINHAMEL; ONDAME BIOMBO 1º 09 MADEM G.-15 SALUMÉ A.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism Without Liberation: Land Reclamation Projects in Guinea-Bissau
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Kohnert, Dirk Article — Accepted Manuscript (Postprint) Socialism without liberation: Land Reclamation Projects in Guinea-Bissau Sociologia Ruralis Suggested Citation: Kohnert, Dirk (1988) : Socialism without liberation: Land Reclamation Projects in Guinea-Bissau, Sociologia Ruralis, ISSN 0038-0199, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, Vol. 28, Iss. 2/3, pp. 161-175, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1988.tb01036.x This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/118630 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 1 Socialism without liberation Land Reclamation Projects in Guinea-Bissau Dirk Kohnert1 National liberation, the struggle against colonialism ... will be empty words without significance for the people, unless they are translated into real improvement of the conditions of life.
    [Show full text]
  • À Descoberta Da Guiné-Bissau À Descoberta Da Guiné-Bissau JOANA BENZINHO | MARTA ROSA
    [GUIA TURÍSTICO] [GUIA TURÍSTICO] 10 Euros | 6 560 CFA COM O APOIO À Descoberta da Guiné-Bissau À Descoberta À Descoberta JOANA BENZINHO | MARTA ROSA da Guiné-Bissau JOANA BENZINHO ROSA | MARTA ESTE PROJETO É FINANCIADO PELA UE IMPLEMENTADO POR WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/AFECTOSCOMLETRAS [Guia TurísTico] À Descoberta da Guiné-Bissau Joana Benzinho | Marta rosa Ficha técnica título: Guia turístico: à descoberta da Guiné-Bissau autoras: Joana Benzinho e Marta rosa afectos com Letras - onGD e-mail: [email protected] Design e paginação: hugo Charrão impressão: Gráfica ediliber, Coimbra tiragem: 3000 isBn: 978-989-20-6252-5 Depósito legal: 402748/15 Dezembro de 2015 todos os direitos reservados de acordo com a legislação em vigor © União Europeia 2015 as informações e pontos de vista estabelecidos nesta publicação não refletem necessariamente a opinião oficial da União europeia. nem as instituições e órgãos da União europeia nem qualquer pessoa agindo em seu nome podem ser responsabilizadas pela utilização que possa ser feita das informações nela contidas. reprodução autorizada desde que a fonte seja citada. Prefácio as relações entre a União europeia e a república da Guiné-Bissau datam de 1975, ano em que o país aderiu à primeira Convenção de Lomé. Comemoram-se assim, em 2015, 40 anos de parceria para o desenvolvimento entre a Guiné-Bissau e a União europeia. orgulhamo-nos de, ao longo destes 40 anos, e conjuntamente com os nossos 28 estados Membros, ter estabelecido um diálogo contínuo com os parceiros nacionais baseado num projeto de paz, de democracia e de respeito pelos direitos humanos, sempre em- penhados em fornecer apoio a vários setores de interesse comum, com vista a fomentar um desenvolvimento socio-económico sustentável e abrangente.
    [Show full text]
  • Apresentação Do Powerpoint
    REPÚBLICA DA GUINÉ-BISSAU ASSEMBLEIA NACIONAL POPULAR COMISSÃO NACIONAL DE ELEIÇÕES RESULTADOS PROVISÓRIOS DAS ELEIÇÕES PARA PRESIDÊNCIA DA REPÚBLICA SEGUNDA VOLTA PROJEÇÃO DE VOTOS POR REGIÃO REGIÃO 01 - TOMBALI CATIÓ, KOMO, BEDANDA, CACINE e QUEBO INSCRITOS 39 704 VOTANTES 28 723 72,34% VOTOS BRANCOS 181 0,63% VOTOS NULOS 102 0,36% VOTOS PROTESTOS/RECLAMAÇÃO 0 0,00% VOTOS VÁLIDOS 28 440 99,01% ABSTENÇÃO 10 981 27,66% PROJEÇÃO DE VOTOS POR REGIÃO REGIÃO 01 - TOMBALI CATIÓ, KOMO, BEDANDA, CACINE e QUEBO Domingos Simões Pereira 10 069:35,40% Umaro Sissoco Embaló 18 371:64,60% PROJEÇÃO DE VOTOS POR REGIÃO REGIÃO 02 - QUINARÁ BUBA, EMPADA, FULACUNDA, TITE INSCRITOS 31 920 VOTANTES 23 063 72,25% VOTOS BRANCOS 134 0,58% VOTOS NULOS 69 0,30% VOTOS PROTESTOS/RECLAMAÇÃO 0 0,00% VOTOS VÁLIDOS 22 860 99,12% ABSTENÇÃO 8 857 27,75% PROJEÇÃO DE VOTOS POR REGIÃO REGIÃO 02 - QUINARÁ BUBA, EMPADA, FULACUNDA, TITE Domingos Simões Pereira 9 749:42,65% Umaro Sissoco Embaló 13 111:57,35% PROJEÇÃO DE VOTOS POR REGIÃO REGIÃO 03 - OIO BISSORÃ, FARIM, MANSABA, MANSOA,NHACRA INSCRITOS 109 179 VOTANTES 79 253 72,59% VOTOS BRANCOS 601 0,76% VOTOS NULOS 448 0,57% VOTOS PROTESTOS/RECLAMAÇÃO 0 0,00% VOTOS VÁLIDOS 78 204 98,68% ABSTENÇÃO 29 926 27,41% PROJEÇÃO DE VOTOS POR REGIÃO REGIÃO 03 - OIO BISSORÃ, FARIM, MANSABA, MANSOA,NHACRA Domingos Simões Pereira 34 905:44,63% Umaro Sissoco Embaló 43 299:55,37% PROJEÇÃO DE VOTOS POR REGIÃO REGIÃO 04 - BIOMBO QUINHAMEL, ONDAME, SAFIM, PRABIS INSCRITOS 50 490 VOTANTES 37 619 74,51% VOTOS BRANCOS 271 0,72% VOTOS NULOS 167 0,44%
    [Show full text]
  • Cholera Epidemic in Guinea-Bissau (2008): the Importance of ‘‘Place’’
    Cholera Epidemic in Guinea-Bissau (2008): The Importance of ‘‘Place’’ Francisco J. Luquero1,2*, Cunhate Na Banga3, Daniel Remartı´nez4, Pedro Pablo Palma4, Emanuel Baron1, Rebeca F. Grais1 1 Epicentre, Paris, France, 2 European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden, 3 Department of Epidemiology, Ministry of Health, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau, 4 Me´dicos Sin Fronteras, Barcelona, Spain Abstract Background: As resources are limited when responding to cholera outbreaks, knowledge about where to orient interventions is crucial. We describe the cholera epidemic affecting Guinea-Bissau in 2008 focusing on the geographical spread in order to guide prevention and control activities. Methodology/Principal Findings: We conducted two studies: 1) a descriptive analysis of the cholera epidemic in Guinea- Bissau focusing on its geographical spread (country level and within the capital); and 2) a cross-sectional study to measure the prevalence of houses with at least one cholera case in the most affected neighbourhood of the capital (Bairro Bandim) to detect clustering of households with cases (cluster analysis). All cholera cases attending the cholera treatment centres in Guinea-Bissau who fulfilled a modified World Health Organization clinical case definition during the epidemic were included in the descriptive study. For the cluster analysis, a sample of houses was selected from a satellite photo (Google EarthTM); 140 houses (and the four closest houses) were assessed from the 2,202 identified structures. We applied K-functions and Kernel smoothing to detect clustering. We confirmed the clustering using Kulldorff’s spatial scan statistic. A total of 14,222 cases and 225 deaths were reported in the country (AR = 0.94%, CFR = 1.64%).
    [Show full text]
  • IFRC- Guinea-Bissau: Cholera; DREF Bulletin No. 05ME046; Final Report (02.05.06)
    GUINEA-BISSAU: CHOLERA no. 05ME046 FINAL REPORT 2 May 2006 The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organization and its millions of volunteers are active in over 183 countries. In Brief Period covered by this Final Report: 4 August to 3 February 2006. History of this Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF)-funded operation: · A total of CHF 27,838 was allocated from the Federations DREF to respond to the needs of this operation, and to replenish disaster preparedness stocks distributed to the affected population. For Minor Emergency, refer to: http://www.ifrc.org/cgi/pdf_appeals.pl?05/05ME046.pdf · For Update no. 1 refer to: http://www.ifrc.org/cgi/pdf_appeals.pl?05/05ME04601.pdf · This operation was expected to be implemented in 3 months, and completed by 3 November 2005. Click here to go directly to the attached financial statement. This operation is aligned with the International Federation's Global Agenda, which sets out four broad goals to meet the Federation's mission to "improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity". Global Agenda Goals: · Reduce the numbers of deaths, injuries and impact from disasters. · Reduce the number of deaths, illnesses and impact from diseases and public health emergencies. · Increase local community, civil society and Red Cross Red Crescent capacity to address the most urgent situations of vulnerability. · Reduce intolerance, discrimination and social exclusion and promote
    [Show full text]
  • Funerals During the 1994 Cholera Epidemic in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa: the Need for Disinfection of Bodies of Persons Dying of Cholera
    Epidemiol. Infect. (1998), 120, 7–15. Printed in the United Kingdom # 1998 Cambridge University Press Funerals during the 1994 cholera epidemic in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa: The need for disinfection of bodies of persons dying of cholera " # $ G.GUNNLAUGSSON , J.EINARSDO; TTIR , F.J.ANGULO *, " " $ S.A.MENTAMBANAR , A.PASSA R.V.TAUXE "The Regional Health Board of Biombo, Ministry of Public Health, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau # The Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden $ The Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (Accepted 26 June 1997) SUMMARY The 1994 cholera epidemic in Guinea-Bissau resulted in 15878 reported cases and 306 deaths. Early in the epidemic, although the health ministry mandated that the bodies of persons dying of cholera be disinfected, outbreaks occurred in several villages following funerals in the region of Biombo. To determine the influence of disinfection and funeral activities on cholera transmission, we analysed surveillance data and conducted a case-control study following a funeral. The attack rate during the week following funerals was higher in villages where bodies were not disinfected (risk ratio ¯ 2±6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1±9–3±8). Cholera was strongly associated with eating at a funeral with a non-disinfected corpse (odds ratio [OR] ¯ 14±5, 95% CI 0±9–786) and with touching (i.e., transporting, washing) the body (OR ¯ 36±2, 95% CI 2±6–1769). During cholera epidemics, in addition to other cholera prevention activities, health officials should inform community leaders about the risk of cholera transmission during funerals, meals should not be served at funerals, and bodies of persons dying of cholera should be disinfected.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Report No: ICR2317 Public Disclosure Authorized IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (TF096347 TF096348) ON A GRANT Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF € 2.87 MILLION (US$4.28 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO THE REPUBLIC OF GUINEA-BISSAU FOR AN EMERGENCY FOOD SECURITY SUPPORT PROJECT UNDER THE Public Disclosure Authorized EUROPEAN UNION FOOD CRISIS RAPID RESPONSE FACILITY June 28, 2012 Agriculture and Rural Development Unit Sustainable Development Department Country Department AFCF1 Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective May 31, 2012) Currency Unit = CFAF CFAF 1.00 = US$ 0.001978 US$ 1.00 = CFAF 505.53 € 1.00 = CFAF 655.96 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CFA Communauté Financière Africaine (Financial Community of Africa) EC European Commission EFSSP Emergency Food Security Support Project ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ERL Economic Recovery Loan EU European Union EUFRF European Union Food Crisis Rapid Response Facility Trust Fund FM Financial management FPCR Food Price Crisis Response Trust Fund GDP Gross domestic product GFRP Global Food Crisis Response Program ha Hectares ICR Implementation Completion and Results Report IDA International Development Association (World Bank Group) ISR Implementation Status Report km kilometer M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MOI Ministry of Infrastructure NGO Nongovernmental organization PDO Project Development Objective
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea Bissau: Qualitative Assessment of Demand Side Constraints to Access Maternal and Child Health Services Public Disclosure Authorized
    Guinea Bissau: Qualitative Assessment of Demand Side Constraints to Access Maternal and Child Health Services Public Disclosure Authorized June 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Health Nutrition Population Global Practice Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized 1 Standard Disclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Du Potentiel De Production De Palmier Et Du Cocotier En Guine Bissau
    EVALUATION DU POTENTIEL DE PRODUCTION DE PALMIER ET DU COCOTIER EN GUINE BISSAU ETUDE PEDO OGIQUE FAO N1GUYEN VAN Projet TCP/GBS/8908 Avril 1980 EVALUATION DU POTENlIEL DE PRODUCTION DE PALIER ET DU COCOTIER EN GUINEE BISSAU ETUDE PEDOLOGIQUE 1.- INTRODUCTION Le Palmier et le Cocotier sélectionnés ont besoin de climat et sol favorables, et dlune alimentation régulière en eau pendant toute llannée pour assurer un bon rendement. La tache principale du PEDOLOGUE CONSULTANT de la présent MISSION FAO consiste h : 1.1. Identifier les Sols des Régions préalablement choisies par 1,AGRONOME, CHEF DE LA MISSION9 1.2. Classer les -sols rencontre's suivant leur Aptitude pour le D4veloppement du Palmier et Cocotier Sélectionnés, 1.3. Etudier la relation Sol-Eau pendant la saison sèche, et 1.4. Chiffrer approximativement les superficies plantables en Palmier ou Cocotier sélectionnés des Secteurs considérés. 2.- RESULTATS Dtaprès les travaux du présent auteur dont : LtEtude des documents existants : les Cartes Topographiques à liéchelle1/50.0006 publiées en1952puis en1969 les Rapports de DA SILVA TEIXEIRA(1962)de la SCET - INTERNATIONAL(1978),de TON THAT TRINH(1979), du DEPARTEMENT DIHYDRAULIQUE AGRICOLE ET DES SOLS(1979 -DE GUINEE BISSAU, etc... ltexamen des Cartes Topographiques à ltéchelle1/200 00 établies par 1IIGN - FRANCE en1977 llexamen-sommaire des Photographies Aériennes lléchelle 1/30.0006, Couverture de Janvier1978. -Les Survols Aériens : sur CANCHUNGO-CACHEU-CAIO-ILHA DE JETA, ILHA DE PECIXE voir Annexe N°2 sur BOLAMA-GALINHAS-CANHABAQUE-RUBANE-SOJA-BUBA UE, voir Annexe N°9 sur ILHAS DE UNO-CARACHE-CARAVELA-FORMOSA, voir Annexe N° 12.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERIM FINAL REPORT 28 April 2006 the Federation’S Mission Is to Improve the Lives of Vulnerable People by Mobilizing the Power of Humanity
    GUINEA-BISSAU: CHOLERA no. 05ME046 INTERIM FINAL REPORT 28 April 2006 The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organization and its millions of volunteers are active in over 183 countries. In Brief Period covered by this Interim Final Report1: 4 August to 3 February 2006. History of this Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF)-funded operation: · A total of CHF 27,838 was allocated from the Federations DREF to respond to the needs of this operation, and to replenish disaster preparedness stocks distributed to the affected population. · This operation was expected to be implemented in 3 months, and completed by 3 November 2005. In line with Federation reporting standards, the DREF Bulletin Final Report was due 30 days after the end of the operation (by 3 February 2006). This operation is aligned with the International Federation's Global Agenda, which sets out four broad goals to meet the Federation's mission to "improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity". Global Agenda Goals: · Reduce the numbers of deaths, injuries and impact from disasters. · Reduce the number of deaths, illnesses and impact from diseases and public health emergencies. · Increase local community, civil society and Red Cross Red Crescent capacity to address the most urgent situations of vulnerability. · Reduce intolerance, discrimination and social exclusion and promote respect for diversity and human dignity. For further information
    [Show full text]
  • Painel 3 Ana Correia Aumento Do Parto Institucional Na Região
    AUMENTO DE PARTO INSTITUICIONAL NA REGIÃO SANITÁRIA DE BIOMBO COM A INTERVENÇÃO DO PIMI/ IMVF Drª Ana Paula Gomes Correia Parteira Ivete Gomes Có. • Introdução • Objetivos • Metodologia • Resultados • Ações implementadas que aumentam a qualidade do CPN e do PARTO • Tabelas da evolução trimestral do CPN4 e Parto • Evolução de CPN4 e parto durante os 3 anos • Experiências usadas para aumentar o parto institucional • Grávidas transferidas em trabalho de parto para C.S Quinhamel • Discussão • Conclusões e Recomendações INTRODUÇÃO • A Região de Biombo População projetada pelo INASA: 99.295 (2020) Mulheres em idade fértil: 21.843 Grávidas esperada: 4.468 Etnia Papel é a maioritária Nº CPN1: 3767/ano • O PIMI/IMVF aposta na qualidade e na gratuitidade desde a vigilância pré-natal até ao parto • Pretendemos com este estudo Investigar a evolução do número de partos institucionais e que factor influenciou essa variação. Fórum Nacional A Saúde Materna e Infantil na Guiné-Bissau OBJETIVOS OBJETIVO GERAL OBJETIVOS ESPECÍFICOS • Identificar ações implementados Caracterizar a evolução do parto que aumentam a qualidade da institucional com a implementação consulta pré-natal (CPN) e do PIMI/IMVF na região sanitária de parto. Biombo do ano 2018 a 2020 • Analisar e comparar a evolução do CPN 4 e dos partos institucional. • Apresentar experiências usados para aumentar o parto institucional. Fórum Nacional A Saúde Materna e Infantil na Guiné-Bissau METODOLOGIA • Materiais e MétoDos Pesquisa descritiva e retrospetiva Uso de variáveis quantitativas • Critério De Inclusão: Partos institucionais nos Centros de saúde públicos das 7 áreas sanitária da região de Biombo • Critério De exclusão: Partos domiciliários e das Instituições de saúde não públicas da região .
    [Show full text]